Hi, I'm Heathcliff and this is Lions Ground.
The members of my Facebook group on facebook.com/groups/lionsground wish me to do another video report related
to Kenneka Jenkins.
I promised myself I only do a new video if I have new facts.
Many people keep their minds busy with the Kenneka Jenkins case, not only national but
internationally, because the story is just weird.
We all have our own thoughts and theories about it, the family and their lawyers suspect
that the videos are incomplete or maybe even edited.
But the following information I'm going to share with you is factual and shocking.
It will give you a clear picture of the Village of Rosemont.
The story begins with former Rosemont police Cmdr.
Frank Siciliano, a man of law but also a man of loyalty.
Too loyal he lost his job.
He was cleared on May 15, 2013, because he did not want to commit to illegal and mafia
practices by Rosemont officials.
The former chief officer accuses Rosemont officials of covering up crimes, favoritism,
misconduct and other illegal practices.
I address Frank Siciliano from now the "Plaintiff".
All claims made by "the Plaintiff" is well documented.
A plaintiff is a person, in this case, former Rosemont police Cmdr.
Frank Siciliano who brings a case against another in a court of law.
"In or about March 2012, Defendant(That's in this case Village of Rosemont a municipal
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois) warned Plaintiff he should
not get involved in the investigation of the suicide of another officer and implied that
certain evidence about steroid use had been removed from the scene to hide this from the
investigators performing the formal investigation.
In response, Plaintiff stated that he would answer any questions truthfully as to what
he knew if he was questioned about this incident.
Plaintiff's rate of pay was improperly reduced within a few days of telling Defendant that
he would answer questions truthfully if he was asked questions about the suicide including
about what may have led to the suicide.
When Plaintiff complained about the reduced pay, Defendant refused to correct his rate
of pay and told Plaintiff to sue the Defendant if he did not like it.
On or about May 15, 2013, Defendant told Plaintiff that his job was being eliminated and that
he was being terminated" It is a good thing for them to conduct an
independent investigation because we are talking about obscuring evidence, manipulating an
investigation and extortion.
Just check the facts: A 19-year-old girl walks totally disoriented
four hours and the hotel does not respond to it, There went basically wrong.
The mother went to the hotel despite a severe infection because she knew her daughter was
missing and she knew she was in the hotel but the hotel refused to help.
During the 911 call, the mother receives advice that could make a difference between life
and death
Kenneka Jenkins' lawyers have only seen 8
snippets while there are 36 hours of video available
The lawyers do not have an autopsy report
The lawyers do not have all the reports
The MSM now claims that there is no video of the freezer?
Remember that, let's return to the Plaintiff.
In 2011, Defendant Stephens Directed Plaintiff to remove some surveillance cameras from the
police station because they were concerned that the cameras may have recorded some unlawful
activity.
Plaintiff refused to remove the cameras.
In or about March 2012, defendant Stephans warned Plaintiff he should not get involved
in the investigation of the suicide of another officer and implied that certain evidence
such as steroids had been removed from the scene prior to a formal investigation of that
suicide.
Here you go again, cover up evidence, manipulating an investigation and extortion.
Again, it is a right decision by Kenneka Jenkins' lawyers to conduct independent research.
The Plaintiff claims he was pressured "to ignore illegal activities or told … not
to investigate or pursue illegal activities committed by certain civilians and certain
officers."
That included pressure not to investigate the involvement of steroids in an officer's
2012 suicide, according to the lawsuit.
Allegations of favoritism have been made before in Rosemont.
Another former officer complained of it in a 2006 lawsuit settled by the village.
But the latest allegations come from someone who spent three decades in the department,
climbing to one of the highest positions in a town largely controlled by one family,
The Stephenses.
Donald Stephens, the former Mayor of Rosemont.
The state attorney general had accused the family Mayor Donald Stephens, of having mob
ties.
In a summer 2005 hearing on the proposed casino's license, an FBI agent testified that Stephens
had met with several organized crime figures about mob control of construction and operations
contracts at the planned gambling hall.
Stephens died in Rosemont on April 18, 2007, of complications of stomach cancer.
Rosemont's current mayor is the son of Donald Stephens, Bradley a.
Stephens.
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
From this, you can conclude that Rosemont is not particularly clean and that cooperation,
in practice with the Kenneka Jenkins case shows similarities with the illegal practices
Rosemont is famous of.
In a press conference, the lawyers of the mother tell them that they do not care what
happens on social media or what other people think, they just want facts because facts
lead to the answers.
They want all the video material and all the reports, that is not too much to ask because
there is still a mother who lost her child without answers.
On my facebook group, I
will compile a document with all the information shown in this video.
Did you know that Rosemont village is corrupt?
Share your opinion.
Click the videos you see on the screen to watch more of my videos.
I sincerely want to thank you for your time watching this video, it's really appreciated.
I'll see in the next video, tomorrow 3 PM CET.
I'm Heathcliff and this is Lions Ground.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét