Waching daily Dec 19 2017

My love for… protein… is no secret.

It is the chief macronutrient emphasized when planning a new fitness goal.

General protein guideline is to get roughly 0.8 grams of protein per KILOgram of bodyweight,

an amount currently debated within the nutrition industry.

Some suggestions have placed the minimum closer 1 to 1.2 grams per kilogram.

But it's clear, consuming more protein than the RDA paired with exercise do show better

results in body composition and overall strength.

The ambiguity of an optimal amount however, has us sometimes asking: How much is too much?

Indeed, there are some cause for concern with excessive protein intake, most of which relates

to the kidneys.

Chronic kidney damage might be accelerated with prolonged high protein intake.

High protein diets might increase glomerular pressure, negatively impacting blood filtration

and renal sufficiency.

In long-term cases, high protein diets have also been linked to the development of kidney

stones.

Potential liver issues with acute high protein fluctuations has shown to induce higher AST

and ALT levels, measurements indicating possible liver damage.

Some issues were also brought up about bone health, where protein-induced acidity might

negatively impact calcium absorption, potentially leading to issues like osteoporosis and increased

risk of bone fractures.

But… all of these issues must be put into complete context.

In terms of bone health, although sound in theory, no strong evidence has ever shown

protein-induced acidity to be an issue.

Findings even suggest that protein increases intestinal calcium absorption and bone metabolism,

which supports bone health.

The one study showing protein negatively impacting the liver was observed in mice.

The mice were given an unnatural diet where, after fasting for 48 hours, half of their

entire dietary intake was casein protein.

No human evidence has ever shown high protein intake impacting the liver.

And finally, in the case of the kidneys, the problem with high protein is indeed legitimate,

but this primarily applies to those with an already existing kidney problem.

In that case, then restricting protein is definitely recommended.

For healthy people, the evidence again… is sorely lacking.

And for those wondering about goals, whether you want to lose weight or build muscle, more

protein almost always correlates with better results.

But does that mean that you should just eat all the protein you want?

Well, no, simply because, after a certain amount, the benefits don't really get any

better.

In fact, more protein can be HURTFUL to your goals.

Too much while losing weight makes it difficult to stick to the diet since more desirable

foods are limited.

Too much during a bulk makes it harder to reach your calories since one, protein tends

to make you feel full quicker, and two, protein digestion is energy costly, requiring you

to eat even more.

In the end of the day, what is considered too much for you?

Well… it…

DEPENDS… on a few factors.

First is the state of your kidneys, where lower protein is recommended when issues exist.

Make sure you check with your doctor to see if you have any underlying problems.

Age might also be of a concern, where the older you get, the more protein you need to

fight off age-induced muscle loss known as sarcopenia.

And of course, it depends on your goals, where you should at least reach RDA, but anything

more than roughly 2.5 grams per kilogram is unnecessary.

Feel free to check out my protein video for a more in-depth approach.

Ultimately, my advice is that you always aim for high quality protein and eat as much as

you feel that you need, just don't overdo it.

I would love to hear your take on protein intake, so please feel free to share your

thoughts in the comments.

Also, make sure to follow me on twitter, facebook, and Instagram if you want some more PictureFit

content and updates.

As always, thank you for watching and get your protein!

… Just not too much.

For more infomation >> Can You Have TOO MUCH Protein? - Duration: 4:05.

-------------------------------------------

s y orosa - faithless - Duration: 3:23.

s y orosa - faithless

For more infomation >> s y orosa - faithless - Duration: 3:23.

-------------------------------------------

So, Two US Government Agencies Cannot Account for $21 TRILLION S - Duration: 8:49.

So, Two US Government Agencies Cannot Account for $21 TRILLION Spent in Only 17 Years

Less than two weeks after the Department of Defense announced it would finally subject

itself to a first-ever audit, a new report puts into perspective precisely why the Pentagon

so sorely needs a thorough analysis of where its trillions upon trillions in taxpayer funds

have gone � because a stupefying $21 trillion cannot be accounted for by just two government

agencies, including the gargantuan DoD.

That sum is indeed $21 trillion � tens of trillions of dollars � spent by the DoD

and Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on � well, no one really knows what.

Not just that, but this rather bewildering amount slipped through cracks in only seventeen

years � from 1998, the year legislation passed mandating annual audits of every government

agency, through 2015.

Michigan State University Professor of Economics Mark Skidmore, who specializes in public finance,

authored the study, which became his brainchild after hearing Catherine Austin Fitts, former

Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during the presidency of George H.W. Bush,

remark on a report from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) revealing no less

than $6.5 trillion unaccounted for, but spent, by the DoD.

Skidmore, flabbergasted, had presumed from experience with previous public financing

matters the astronomical figure too high not to be a mistake.

�Sometimes you have an adjustment just because you don�t have adequate transactions,�

he explained of what typically happens when funds aren�t accounted for, in an interview

in early December, �so an auditor would just recede.

Usually it�s just a small portion of authorized spending, maybe one percent at most.

So for the Army one percent would be $1.2 billion of transactions that you just can�t

account for.�

Except, the erstwhile �missing� monies didn�t total in the billions, and Skidmore

soon confirmed the preposterous sum published in the OIG report, �Army General Fund Adjustments

Not Adequately Documented or Supported,� on July 26, 2016.

On December 8 � the day following the Pentagon�s audit announcement � he and Boston University

Economics Professor Laurence Kotlikoff co-authored a column for Forbes explicating the research

and expanding on the problematic OIG report, stating,

�The report indicates that for fiscal year 2015, the Army failed to provide adequate

support for $6.5 trillion in journal voucher adjustments.

According to the GAO�s Comptroller General, �Journal vouchers are summary-level accounting

adjustments made when balances between systems cannot be reconciled.

Often these journal vouchers are unsupported, meaning they lack supporting documentation

to justify the adjustment or are not tied to specific accounting transactions � For

an auditor, journal vouchers are a red flag for transactions not being captured, reported,

or summarized correctly.��

He continues, �Given that the entire Army budget in fiscal year 2015 was $120 billion,

unsupported adjustments were 54 times the level of spending authorized by Congress.

The July 2016 report indicates that unsupported adjustments are the result of the Defense

Department�s �failure to correct system deficiencies.� The result, according to

the report, is that data used to prepare the year-�end financial statements were unreliable

and lacked an adequate audit trail.

The report indicates that just 170 transactions accounted for $2.1 trillion in year-end unsupported

adjustments.

No information is given about these 170 transactions.

In addition many thousands of transactions with unsubstantiated adjustments were, according

to the report, removed by the Army.

There is no explanation concerning why they were removed nor their magnitude.

The July 2016 report states, �In addition, DFAS (Defense Finance and Accounting Service)

Indianapolis personnel did not document or support why DDRS (The Defense Department Reporting

System) removed at least 16,513 of 1.3 million feeder file records during the Third Quarter.��

Affirming the jaw-dropping anomalous figure led Skidmore promptly to enjoin Fitts for

a collaboration with graduate students examining thousands of additional Inspector General

reports, dating from 1998 through 2015, the last year for which data was available at

the time of the project � concentrating solely on the Defense Department and the Department

of Housing and Urban Development.

�This is incomplete,� Skidmore advised, �but we have found $21 trillion in adjustments

over that period.

The biggest chunk is for the Army.

We were able to find 13 of the 17 years and we found about $11.5 trillion just for the

Army.�

Although even the preliminary numbers would sound nearly anyone�s alarm bells, Skidmore

refused to propound on the nature of the unaccounted funds � whether it could have been allotted

toward covert but legitimate projects, misallocated, brazenly wasted, or otherwise � but did

characterize the raw findings as profoundly telling of a dearth in transparency in funding

and parallel evisceration of due process in budgeting at the federal level of government.

Whether the Pentagon�s vanishing funds will ever be matched to tangible ends in its first

or future financial post-mortem seems optimistically unrealistic; however, that the ball is finally

rolling presents to the disgruntled public a momentous opportunity to pressure officials

to be held accountable for squandering such embarrassing sums of taxpayer income.

After all, they�re listening � Skidmore�s interview with USAWatchdog came out on December

3 � with the Pentagon�s announcement following just four days later, on the 7th.

Further, Skidmore noted peremptorily that, as he and Fitts scoured figures online, they

observed something suspicious on the website for the Office of Inspector General, asserting

in a side note,

�[A]fter Mark Skidmore began inquiring about OIG-reported unsubstantiated adjustments,

the OIG�s webpage, which documented, albeit in a highly incomplete manner, these unsupported

�accounting adjustments,� was mysteriously taken down.

Fortunately, Mark copied the July 2016 report and all other relevant OIG reports in advance

[available at this link].

Mark has repeatedly tried to contact Lorin Venable, Assistant Inspector General at the

Office of the Inspector General.

He has emailed, phoned, and used LinkedIn to ask Ms. Venable about OIG�s disclosure

of unsubstantiated adjustments, but she has not responded.�

In fact, as noted previously by The Mind Unleashed, the Department of Defense also recently edited

its original audit announcement in a superficially innocuous yet potentially insidious detail

� halving the total number of auditors to descend on the military, as seen in an internet

archive of the page, to just 1,200 � without explanation, notation of adjusted figure,

nor any other remark explicating the adjustment a simple mistake or otherwise.

Despite a remarkable $21 trillion essentially having evaporated from just two albeit notoriously

thriftless governmental agencies, Skidmore fears public apathy will reign � with predictably

wearisome results.

�If the American people don�t stand up and say this is unacceptable,� the economist

admonished, �nothing is going to happen.

This is just wrong.�

For more infomation >> So, Two US Government Agencies Cannot Account for $21 TRILLION S - Duration: 8:49.

-------------------------------------------

Hidroponía: cultivar sin tierra alimentará al planeta en el futuro - Duration: 3:57.

For more infomation >> Hidroponía: cultivar sin tierra alimentará al planeta en el futuro - Duration: 3:57.

-------------------------------------------

Where Do Icicles Come From? - Duration: 4:28.

♩♩Intro♩♩

We just had the first big snowstorm of the year the other day!

Squeaks and I had so much fun playing in it.

[Squeaks squeaks]

Yeah, that was when we went sledding!

We also like to build new things together when it snows, like snowballs, snowmen, or

even igloos!

All of that snow is so much fun, and it can completely change the world around us.

The ground is covered in a thick, white blanket, and ponds start to freeze over.

And there's another thing that changes.

There are spikes of ice hanging down from the roof of the Fort!

These long cones of ice are called icicles, which is a pretty good name for them, since

they kind of look like ice turned into a popsicle!

Icicles form down from different places where there's snow.

You might see them growing off of roofs, gutters, and even tree branches.

It looks like ice is dripping right off of those trees, doesn't it?

But how do icicles get there in the first place?

Well, just like a snowman, icicles are made out of the snow.

But unlike a snowman, people don't make the icicles — they form naturally.

For icicles to form, there have to be two things: snow, and warm sunlight.

See, the snow and the ice in these icicles are made out of the same thing: frozen water.

When liquid water gets really cold, like during the winter where we live, it freezes into

ice.

Usually, we get our frozen water coming down from the sky as snow.

It might seem very different from the hard ice in an ice cube, but the only difference

is how the frozen water is shaped.

Each snowflake is made up of tiny pieces of ice arranged into a snowflake shape, whereas

in an ice cube the little pieces of ice are all packed together.

So snow and ice are really made of the same stuff.

After the snow falls, it sits on the ground, on top of branches, and on roofs, and as long

as it's below a certain temperature, that snow will stay frozen.

We call this temperature the freezing point.

It's about 0 degrees Celsius or 32 degrees Fahrenheit.

[Squeaks squeaks]

Exactly, that's what people mean when they say it's freezing outside.

They mean it feels really cold — maybe cold enough to freeze water into ice or snow.

But even on a freezing cold day, the sun can still come out.

And the sunlight is warm!

As the warm sunlight hits the snow, the temperature of the snow starts to slowly go above the

freezing point again.

What do you think might happen to the snow, Squeaks?

[Squeaks squeaks]

That's right, it will start to melt into water.

But!

It melts very slowly, and it doesn't all melt at once.

The heat from the sunlight melts the top layer of snow into water, then the next, and the

next.

But if it's only above freezing for a short time, something special can happen — like

what happened to the snow on our roof.

As the top layer of snow on the roof melted, it rolled down the roof as liquid water, and

some of it started to drip off of the roof.

But it didn't /stay/ melted for very long!

By the time the water got to the edge of the roof, the cold air around it cooled it back

down below the freezing point.

The water stopped in its tracks and froze back into ice, but it wasn't shaped like

a snowflake anymore.

This time, the ice was all packed together like in a hard ice cube.

That tiny little frozen drop at the edge of the roof became the beginning of an icicle!

[Squeaks squeaks]

That's true, the icicles on our roof are much bigger than one drop of ice!

Even though icicles start out small, they can grow.

It can take a very long time for an icicle to get big, but eventually, they can get /huge/!

As the sun keeps melting the snow, and the cold air keeps re-freezing the water as it

drips down, the icicle will start to get longer, and thicker.

More ice will get added, then more, and more, until you have some enormous icicles!

Sometimes that takes weeks, but other times, it can happen in just a few days.

It all depends on having the snow, the warm sun to melt it, and the cold air to freeze

it back into ice.

and if all these things work together just right, your roof can end up perfectly decorated

for the winter.

Have you ever seen icicles forming?

What kinds of amazing things do you think you could build out of frozen snow or ice?

Have a grown-up help you leave a comment below, or send us an email at kids@scishow.com.

We'll see you next time, here at the fort!

♩♩Outro♩♩

For more infomation >> Where Do Icicles Come From? - Duration: 4:28.

-------------------------------------------

How To Get Skinny Fast For A Kid! - Duration: 5:45.

For more infomation >> How To Get Skinny Fast For A Kid! - Duration: 5:45.

-------------------------------------------

► Imitando fotos Románticas de Instagram - Duration: 9:18.

For more infomation >> ► Imitando fotos Románticas de Instagram - Duration: 9:18.

-------------------------------------------

Christmas Tale part 6 - Day 20 - Advent calendar 2017 - Duration: 2:29.

Claus, so cool that we're taking the train. Good for the environment. And you can use the time to crochet, do a jigsaw with 1000 pieces, sharp pencils or bake sand cakes.

Jackpot! There is Wifi! LokLAN or something like that.

Great Claus, you can sleep again.

What? I didn't sleep, I'm sitting behind the the steering wheel if you didn't realize.

Oh, you drove with your eyes closed? Looked like sleeping.

What are you talking about Rudi? We're just on this fucking train because you talk so much that you'll chew my ear off.

Thank's Clausi.

Crazy guys. Oh my god ey. We're on a train because Claus drove with his eyes closed.

So creepy! But also quite a cool James Bond move. And we save energy for the environment. Awesome, isn't it? I'll keep you updated. Ciaoiii

All roads lead to the sea... I still have a frog in my sleeve...

Boah honestly?

Biting dogs don't sleep..

It doesn't matter... Nothing matters anymore... We're stuck here... No parcels for christmas...

You lazy assmunches... You got me... I won't make it...

Order your fucking single teabags in the internet... Without me... The train has left... Wherever it will take us...

For more infomation >> Christmas Tale part 6 - Day 20 - Advent calendar 2017 - Duration: 2:29.

-------------------------------------------

Awkward Megyn Kelly Interviews That Will Make You Cringe - Duration: 4:40.

Megyn Kelly didn't have the 2017 she likely thought she would.

After leaving Fox News to headline her own morning talk show for NBC, Megyn Kelly Today,

the former anchor has been repeatedly slammed by audiences and critics for her many awkward

gaffes.

Here's a look at some awkward Megyn Kelly interviews that will make you cringe.

The cast of Will and Grace

When Megyn Kelly Today launched in September 2017, Kelly immediately announced that she

was "done with politics."

But politics wasn't quite done with her, as a seemingly innocent interview with the cast

of Will and Grace on her very first day went wildly awry when she brought a fan of the

show onto the stage.

"Is it true that you became a lawyer, and that you became gay, because of Will?"

The fan wisely sidestepped the question about becoming gay, but Kelly doubled down on the

ill advised joke with her sendoff.

"I don't know about the lawyer thing, but I think that Will & Grace thing and the gay

thing are going to work out great."

The backlash directed at that segment prompted Will & Grace star Debra Messing to declare

that she was "dismayed" by Kelly's comments and "regrets" going on the show.

Jane Fonda

Just two days after the Will and Grace debacle, actress Jane Fonda appeared on the show alongside

Robert Redford to discuss their movie Our Souls at Night.

But things didn't quite go as planned when Kelly instead ambushed Fonda with a question

about plastic surgery.

"Why did you say, I read that you said you felt you're not proud to admit that you had

work done.

Why not?"

"We really wanna talk about that right now?"

Kelly fumbled to recover, saying that people admire Fonda's looks, to which Fonda credited

her "good attitude [and] good posture" before insisting on returning to the subject matter

at hand, which was the film.

Fonda later revealed that she was displeased by the question because it wasn't the right

time or place to address that issue.

The Menendez Brothers

When the TV series Law & Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders came out in September,

2017, Kelly piggybacked on the hype by airing an interview with Lyle Menendez, who along

with his brother Erik was convicted for the 1989 murder of their parents.

Critics had a field day, slamming Kelly for offering up softball questions in an interview

that was short on substance and long on fluff.

One detective who'd been part of the original case blasted Kelly's segment for pandering

to Menendez, saying, "I thought the whole thing was self-serving to Lyle."

Suzanne Somers

In November 2017, actress-turned-author Suzanne Somers appeared on the show alongside her

husband, Alan Hamel to promote her lifestyle book, Two's Company.

While joking about how active their love life is, Somers said, "Sometimes I'm not awake

for it, though."

Viewers and critics were appalled at what some viewed as the promotion of non-consensual

relations, but Kelly just played along, even as Hamel and Somers began discussing the international

legality of intercourse with a sleeping spouse.

"Alan's like, 'Those are some of the best times.'"

"That's fine with me."

"Yeah, right… does it matter?"

Somers eventually apologized for taking things too far, but the damage was definitely done.

Carli Lloyd

In yet another blooper entry from Megyn Kelly's no-good-very-bad first month on Megyn Kelly

Today, she interviewed soccer star Carli Lloyd to talk about her initiative to get girls

involved in sports.

While the interview itself was innocuous enough, at least one member of Kelly's crew forgot

his cues and let a four-letter word slip right onto the live telecast.

"But I think, uh, what's been most fascinating is, that..."

"S---!!"

NBC has since edited out the error from its digital version of the sit-down.

But, hey, it could've been worse.

She could've been interviewing Mike Huckabee, like she did back in her Fox News days.

"Joining me now, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee who's the host of F---abee,

of HUCKabee."

Russell Brand

There's no doubt that Russell Brand has made an entire career out of being extreme, and

he certainly brought his trademark over-the-top enthusiasm to the set of Megyn Kelly Today

in October 2017.

At the time of his appearance, Kelly's show had just been through a widely maligned first

week, so he attempted to comfort her with a series of saccharine compliments that were

secondhand embarrassing.

"And I love you in the daytime, well done, coming into the glorious light!

It's beautiful here!"

"It's like you've escaped.

You're like an escaped Stormtrooper who's took his helmet off to reveal a great beauty!"

That's… just weird.

But it was also just the start, as he later waxed poetic after she read a passage from

his book Recovery: Freedom From Our Addictions.

"God, you should have done the audio book, that was amazing!"

"Is that…"

"Such incredible gravitas!

Now that I meet you as an actual human being, I feel appalled that anyone would ever be

rude to you.

You're glorious!"

So don't worry, Megyn.

Because no matter how bad your ratings get, it looks like you've earned at least one fan

for life.

Thanks for watching!

Click the Looper icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> Awkward Megyn Kelly Interviews That Will Make You Cringe - Duration: 4:40.

-------------------------------------------

[#18] Grand Conte de Noël - Tartempion sous le Sable - Duration: 3:46.

For more infomation >> [#18] Grand Conte de Noël - Tartempion sous le Sable - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

A Bayonetta Birthday Blast to the Past! Examining Bayonetta 3's History for New Protagonist Clues - Duration: 5:45.

Happy birthday Bayonetta!

No, really, Bayonetta was born today, December 19th, 1411 so she's looking pretty good

for being over 600 years old.

Of course, December 19th is also the birthday of her creator, Hideki Kamiya, making today

a bit of a special occasion.

And to celebrate, we wanted to take a slightly deeper look at Bayonetta 3.

Now we already did an in-depth analysis of the Bayonetta 3 teaser itself so make sure

to check that out if you haven't already.

So to kick the festivities off, let's revisit the birth of the series itself, and take a

quick look back at the teaser trailer for the original Bayonetta that started it all.

Pretty similar to Bayonetta 3, isn't it?

Now let's continue right into the teaser for Bayonetta 2.

Interesting...and let's take one more look at the one for 3.

So not only are all 3 teasers pretty similar, but watching them back to back like this shows

a clear evolution thematically.

In the first one, Bayonetta's the one decimating the Angels with no issues whatsoever.

But in Bayonetta 2, she's shown to be on equal footing with Balder in his masked form.

And by Bayonetta 3, well, she's getting the crap kicked out her and literally falling

to pieces by the end.

No really, you can see her legs fall in different directions indicating that she was either

split in half or destroyed entirely leaving only what we see remaining.

Remember, her clothes are actually made of her hair.

Based on this seemingly gruesome end, many have wondered if Bayonetta 3 might feature

a new protagonist.

And as it turns out, there's possibly even more evidence to support this idea.

Because back in May, Source Gaming had the chance to interview Atsushi Inaba of Platinum

Games, and they asked him If Bayonetta 3 were to ever happen, would Bayonetta still be the

protagonist or would he try to surprise fans?

And his answer was pretty interesting.

Because he immediately mentioned the possibility of a male Bayonetta, but laughed afterwards

making it pretty clear he was joking...but we can't help but wonder, was he?

At the very least, he makes it clear they have definitely been considering the idea

of a new protagonist for Bayonetta 3.

Atsushi stated that...

"There's plenty of precedent for changing protagonists, and so that is something we

discuss – do we want to keep the same one, have a different one, add new ones – but

that's certainly not anything I can say for sure at this point."

Making it even trickier to tell is the fact that the rest of his answer rings true and

even indicated that they were preparing for a Bayonetta 3, or at least ideas for a sequel.

Which, of course, we now know is officially a thing.

So between this interview and the tantalizing suggestion at the end of the Bayonetta 3 teaser,

it seems we very well may be looking at playing as someone else in the next game.

So will a new character actually take over?

Could it be split between Bayonetta and another character from the series like Jeanne?

It's not impossible since the past games have featured her, Rodin, and even Balder

as playable characters in extra modes.

This doesn't answer the question of whether a new male character named Bayonetta will

appear though.

The series loves time travel so maybe her son from the future?

Or perhaps someone wishing to carry on her legacy?

That is, of course, if she really is dead.

It's impossible to tell what direction Platinum will go, but it's those very possibilities

that excite us.

There is one other small thing that caught our eye during the comparison though, Bayonetta's

legs.

In Bayonetta, the shot finishes on her left leg.

In Bayonetta 2, it's on her right leg.

And in Bayonetta 3, it's in the center.

We have no idea what the significance of this could be, but it is a fascinating detail.

But what do you guys think?

Could Bayonetta 3 feature a new protagonist, let alone a male one?

And will Bayonetta really die?

Let us know in the comments and be sure to subscribe to GameXplain for more on Bayonetta,

including our previous analysis of this teaser, and other things gaming.

For more infomation >> A Bayonetta Birthday Blast to the Past! Examining Bayonetta 3's History for New Protagonist Clues - Duration: 5:45.

-------------------------------------------

지독하다고 피하던 친구의 '방귀 냄새'는 사실 건강에 좋다 - Duration: 3:18.

For more infomation >> 지독하다고 피하던 친구의 '방귀 냄새'는 사실 건강에 좋다 - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

Day 13 Getaway Canning Stock Route, 4x4 Australia 2017 - Duration: 9:07.

Hello and welcome to day 13 of the Getaway Canning Stock Route.

This is a trip for members of the Getaway 4WD Club.

Today we're traveling from well 15 to well 10.

We're in Birriliburu country.

So... let's go!

Here's a visual for you showing Billiluna where we started the track

and Wiluna where we'll finish.

Last night, with a lot of support & advice from onlookers

Graham fixed my spare and this morning ...still good.

Wow! Another wreck left on the side of the track to rust.

I've lost count now of the number

On the side, another victim of the Canning Stock Route.

It's a well-made trailer.

We're not quite sure what's caused the problem.

But... she's been abandoned.

Ok, onto well 14.

Just passed a motorbike rider.

He's got a couple of friends with him back along the track.

We've been signaling ahead on channel 40. No reponse.

He just arrived out of nowhere and

his mates are coming along when? I don't know.

Turns out there's 4 motorbikes and a support vehicle.

They're doing a trial run in readiness for the big assault

on the CSR next year.

Wow! Be wonderful if you guys got CBs

and if you used them and responded to call-outs.

Need to keep it safe out there guys. For all of us.

(Jeremy) Here we have the remains of well 14.

Just a hole in the ground there.

Bit of troughing through the bush.

Obviously still water around... the trees are growing.

This is what Eric (Gard) is concerned about.

All this foliage, it's a tinderbox.

One lightning strike and poof! No more well 14.

We can help. Look at the video I did with Eric Gard and

help out if you can.

You can see the troughs here going through.

Just signing the visitors book at well 14.

And here it is.

And it's in memory of Kevin Albert Weckart

from South Australia. He died suddenly of a heart attack

fulfilling his dream of crossing the Canning Stock Route

loved, respected and missed by all.

Well done Kevin.

Meanwhile we pushed on to well 13.

Listen to Murray coming in!

Thank goodness we fixed that manifold.

It is amazing what a bit of fencing wire can fix

Well here we are at well 13.

Looks like it hasn't been restored.

Obviously. So still quite a lot of the infrastructure

Troughs look good.

See where the white ants have had a nibble

That's our beloved trip leader, the driver of Chief

as in Chieftain Tank.

Now, there's a little mystery surrounding this well.

No! Not another murder. You don't have to worry.

When canning returned to restore the wells in 1930

he found sheep prints all around the area

so he was really befuddled about that.

Now I wonder if Mr. Snell had something to do with that.

I might ask Mr. Phil Bianchi later.

Our roving reporter EriKa doesn't have much to report on this one

Here's Sir Bob, ready to jump in.

This is ahh..which one is this?

Well 12. Lady Lesley.

It's quite deep isn't it? Yeah

Yeah there's some water here

Gotta watch Lucy doesn't fall in. Yes.

Lady Lesley's gonna have a shower.

You just got to give it a bit more wire, haven't you...

No. That;s enough.

That;s good. How's it looking? Yep.

The area, is just gorgeous.

You can camp here and it's nice but there's no wood

but it is um...

there's lovely desert Oaks around and there are galahs

apparently at times and some beautiful colored Sparrowhawks

so keep your eye out

when you're here you might see something

We've just stopped at Lake Aerodrome

and Snell found this. He was charged with finding

a place to land a plane out here and this is it. Phew.

It's called Goodwin Soak or Panju Gandarri.

The water is very brackish

We asked Graham what it tastes like and he

said I can smell it from here. I'm not tasting it.

There you go well 11.

At this site a young Aboriginal was chained up

and he escaped with the chains still around his neck

Apparently they caught the young fella 40 miles away

but, instead of taking him back...

They took the chains off him and left him with his old people

Isn't it a nice change to have a happy ending

in terms of Aboriginal non-Aboriginal interaction out there.

I like it anyway.

Well we've ...What do you think?

Give us... 21 KPH...for the...

Ok, I'm just gonna read out some rats and stats

directly from Mr. Bobby. Sir Bob we call him.

The highest we've done on the trip is 24 kmph,

the lowest was 17 kmph

the difficulties out here is the length

and the state of the track.

From Bobby's point of view, he felt like the driving

was pretty comfortable

and I have to say it's not the worst I've done

so um...and also

he said, Bobby said he has only been in a low wheel drive twice.

That's for those of you that love the old stats.

Ok, that's good to know. Thankyou Bob. You're welcome.

Pulled up at McConkey Hill. This guy died

McConkey he was only 52 and the named the hill after him.

So onwards and upwards. On to the next well.

Chatter

Here we are at well 10.

And it's a fair way down to water.

Listen?

There's water. Yeh. It plopped away.

Now how clean is it Lesley? Clean?

I'm clean. Yeh but not on this well you didn't

No I didn't. No.

I wouldn't be dragging water out of this one.

What do you reckon? No. Probably not. Too much of an effort.

Our fearless leaders have arrived in the chieftain tank.

What's the story then? Nothing on this one. You can see we're coming to the end of the trip.

Oh not another well

Chatter

We camped at well 10. Beautiful spot.

So another exciting day on the track.

Thankyou for joining us

If you like the video please give me a thumbs up

Put your comments down below

share with your friends and subscribe here if you can

That's it. I hope to see you out there. Bye bye.

For more infomation >> Day 13 Getaway Canning Stock Route, 4x4 Australia 2017 - Duration: 9:07.

-------------------------------------------

How a Blind Gamer Plays Nintendo Switch - Duration: 7:50.

For more infomation >> How a Blind Gamer Plays Nintendo Switch - Duration: 7:50.

-------------------------------------------

Can You Really Die of Old Age? - Duration: 2:21.

At some point, you've probably heard of someone who supposedly "died of old age."

Usually, that just means they died of complications related to getting older, or from something

a younger person might have survived, like pneumonia.

Because, even though age can contribute to someone's death, it almost definitely won't

be the direct cause.

The cells in our bodies do have a set lifespan -- or a point at which they quit dividing

-- but you'll never find that written on a death certificate.

It's called cellular senescence, and scientists think it's mostly because of little structures

on the end of your chromosomes called telomeres.

Telomeres are stretches of repeating nucleotides, the compounds that make up DNA.

And they act as caps to protect the genetic material in your chromosomes during cellular reproduction.

Each time a cell divides, those telomeres get a little shorter, thanks to the mechanics

of how chromosomes are copied.

And when they get short enough, senescence sets in, and the cell can't duplicate itself anymore.

But other factors also contribute to cell aging.

One is oxidative stress, or damage done to your DNA by highly reactive molecules that

contain oxygen.

Another is glycation, which is when sugar molecules bind to key parts of your cells

and prevent them from functioning.

Unfortunately, all of these things are pretty much inevitable over time.

You can take some actions to combat them -- like, you might've heard how antioxidants in certain

foods can fight the effects of oxidation -- but you can't stop them completely.

Scientists aren't sure how old you'd have to be before your cells just couldn't duplicate

anymore, but that's because age-related diseases and injuries will catch up with someone

long before they can die directly of cellular senescence.

As someone gets older and damage from all these sources pile up, their cells are more

likely to have problems working correctly and fixing themselves when something goes wrong.

That means their immune system gets weaker, and they become more susceptible to all kinds

of injuries and diseases, like heart and blood pressure problems, and Alzheimer's.

When these diseases appear, they can affect someone's ability to get around and take

care of themselves, and can also cause problems in their organ systems.

And those will be the direct causes of death, even though age may be a contributing factor.

Thanks to Patreon patron Tommy Boyer for asking, and thanks to all of our patrons who voted

on our poll to help us choose this question to be answered.

If you'd like to submit your questions and help SciShow keep existing, go to patron.com/scishow.