It's interesting how the #MeToo campaign, more than anything, has brought forward allegations against feminist men from the left.
I haven't seen many nationalists here.
Linus Bylund was accused by Hanna Wigh and another SD-politician is accused of rape, the rest are primarliy feminist-leftists.
It started with Fredrik Virtanen, as you all know, then 2 of his co-workers were accused too.
And the cover-up has been ridiculous. It's so bad that Norway had to namedrop the other celebrity profile from Aftonbladet.
While Swedish media still haven't. Or I dunno, does the anarchist paper Arbetaren count as Swedish media?
Because that's the only paper I've seen namedropping thus far, in a great article about how your opinions don't mean shit unless they're reflected in your actions.
That's really a lesson the Left needs to adopt more. Probably the Right too.
It's weird how Fadakars girlfriend is a Moderat, feminist, and writes this when they've left the country because of his rape allegations.
BTW, it's fucking crazy what an open secret Virtanen's behavior has been.
I found this humor skit from 2007, and it affirms Wallins claim that everyone in the cultural elite were aware of it.
Some Finn called today and wanted an exclusive, Fredrik Fittanen or something like that (Fitta = Pussy)
Virtanen.
Whatever, he can talk so long he doesn't grope me and keeps his distance. You know journalists, freaking twotimers.
Oh well, the 3rd perpetrator is Oisin Cantwell who you've probably seen before. And the 4th, which is the funniest of all, is Soran Ismail!
And you know this isn't just slander from racist alt-media, because the sources here are, among others, Arbetaren. As well as his fellow comedians.
The columnist Fredrik Virtanen is no longer allowed to write for Aftonbladet, after a decision from the papers editor in chief Karin Pettersson.
Virtanen is displeased with the decision, but plans on buying the editor a drink and then forcefully inserting his articles when she's passed out.
Over to you, Arman.
Thank you. This week a famous Swedish comedian was accused of several rapes.
We here at Måndag have chosen not to name names, but let's put it like this: Magnus Betnérs next tour will now only be called "for Sweden".
Over to you, Youfi.
I've also been contacted by a person in the business who wants to be anonymous, but guarantees that Soran is the guy.
People have been talking about his behavior towards women for many years in the comedy industry, and Swedish stand-up is a small scene.
The reason this person wanted to be anonymous is because he has business with Soran's colleagues,
which is true for many in the business and might explain why nobody said something earlier.
And this article doesn't help Soran's reputation. Ugh, what is it with feminist men and rape?
oh my god
So it's pretty absurd that when 3 women file police charges for rape and molestation, the media refuses to say who it's about.
Because they were happy to name apolitical TV-celebrities like the carpenter Timell or Lasse Kronér.
But one of Sweden's most famous comedians, TV-personality, antiracist, feminist,
part in one of Sweden's biggest podcasts, won a human rights award even, he's the 78th most powerful person in Sweden,
but there's no public interest when he breaks his values in the worst way possible?
So Swedish media doesn't think people should know that Sweden's biggest feminist comedian,
whose entire image is feminism, is also a rapist? Shouldn't people know that?
Really? Oh, okay. Well, it is the journalists who know best after all, so ehhh
So no, nothing has changed. Aftonbladet listed that weeks hot topics and Virtanen wasn't anywhere, so there goes their credibility.
You might've figured that media finally turned honest because they named Virtanen,
but keep in mind it took them over a week to do that, after Wallin and alt-media had already done so.
Then there were headlines, yes, but Virtanen was simply a human sacrifice. Nothing more.
They only did it to shut down the chatter on social media about how mass media darken things.
I mean wtf, even Clara Henry brought those allegations. Everyone talked about it, from left to right, it was really everywhere.
So naming Virtanen eventually was nothing, it was stating the obvious.
They only did it to save their rep. And it didn't work.
Aftonbladet and TV4 saw a big decrease in public trust after that thing with Timell and Virtanen was revealed.
So it's not surprising that they won't name the other 4 men, because people care when you cover things up.
I forgot to mention the 4th one btw, it's a former chief at Aftonbladet who's now suspended.
Then there's the lesbian leftist at SverigesRadio who's dirtied around too, it's rumoured on Flashback that it's Lotta Bromér.
But how should we know? Employees at SR were told to cover up that the predator quit, so what should I say?
Btw, public service media gets 8000 million a year in tax money to conduct their business.
So ponder how reasonable that is, considering they hire and keep a predator despite their employees objections.
AH there it's out, it was Lotta Bromér. Turns out Expressen reads Flashback too.
Then there's Lars Ohly, he's a dirty fuck too. In light of this I figured we could read some quotes of his.
First one: "I'm like Gudrun, but a bit angrier."
I wonder what Gudrun thinks of that comparison today.
Another one: "Racism and misogyni goes hand in hand."
Nah, I dunno. Considering how many leftist men been caught lately we should popularize a new phrase.
What about "socialism and misogyni goes hand in hand"?
Since the Left wants to abolish private ownership they feel entitled to others women!
Walla, why should you have her to yourself? Share brother, be a good comrade, eeehhhhh?
See? It's all about the ideology.
It also seems to be a structure that when leftist men get caught, they blame structures.
First you molest women, then you blame patriarchy for molesting women, and so you manage to be an asshole and feminist hero at the same time!
Another leftist politician got 4,8 million in tax money as a severance fee, when it was revealed he's a pig.
It's a very strange system, to give someone lots of money if they turn out to be so incompetent that you have to fire them. Who came up with that shit?
Why do the media cover up so much?
Nobody got an answer? Okay, I'll take the liberty then. Eh. Because there's a culture war.
For the journalist elite it's not about what's true. It's about who benefits and who doesn't in the long run.
Think about it! Soran Ismail, Sweden's "symbol for a generation" whose been given massive media attention
to lecture us about how terrible it is to have prejudice against immigrants! Turns out to be a serial rapist.
Do you get how embarrassing this is for virtue-media and the antiracists?
The Sweden Democrats biggest critic over the years turns out to be a simple rapist jigaboo!
You recall the iron pipe scandal, I assume? Soran has been instrumental in undermining the SD.
Media has dwelled on it until it's dead, dug up the corpse, had sex with it and so did Soran.
Several years later his stand up is still about that. I know, very boring comedian.
The point is this: people made a huge deal about that SD-politician calling a girl "whore" when she interrupted their bickering,
and apparently that proves everyone in the SD hate women. That's how the public debate has sounded.
But now it turns out the immigrant icon did way worse things to women than the nationalist politician.
Which can be applied to numerous celebrities who've taken tone against SD.
And that makes the entire Left look bad, it makes SD:s opponents look retarded and it makes the journalists attacks on the party lose ground.
Since you have misogynists in your own ranks, what right do you have to judge nationalists?
And let me just clarify that I understand it's not logically sustainable to take a few examples, then say that it proves a structure.
....but that's exactly what the Left does! That's precisely what the feminists always do!
A few anecdotes proves that the whole X in the equation is a fucking demon.
That's the incredibly low level you put on the public debate, so can you blame me for talking like this? I don't think so.
Now I understand some might say: "But all men rape, this isn't a political issue!"
Okay, but here's a thought: The Left would definitely turn this into a political issue if it was the other way around.
I mean they've already done with ridiculous chants like "racism and misogyni goes hand in hand". Then they define everyone they dislike as racists.
If it were right-wing men being named on a treadmill there'd definitely be articles about the rights "party culture".
We've already seen that with SD. Remember the media tsunami when Hanna Wigh made allegations?
She said she was subjected to something and the party didn't take it seriously. The same has now happened with big media corporations and other partys.
In the Green Party women have been warning about a parliament members sexual abuse for over 10 years.
One woman even says he made out with her baby. Yet the Green Party did nothing.
This is a feminist party but he kept his high positions in the party, and even made his way into parliament.
The perpetrator is also very popular within the party. But we're talking 20 witnesses and a behavior that's been going on for very long.
This is worse than Hanna Wigh and SD. Yet there won't be nearly as much media hysteria.
Kalla Fakta won't do a report on it, and it won't be used as a bat against the party as a whole - like it did with SD.
So do you see why I have to turn it into a political issue?
Or, I'm not transforming anything since it already was a political issue. YOU made it political when you stopped treating all partys the same.
The #MeToo campaign is an uncontrolled wave of information.
In essence it's apolitical since anyone can use the hashtag to say anything about anyone.
Yet more women speak out against the Left than the Right.
I don't think the left is more rapey than the right in actuality, but it feels like there's something weird going on.
That we should focus more on perhaps.
And my friends say "immigrants do this and that", but I'm like hey, I'm an immigrant.
They go "no Soran, you're Swedish", and that's kinda like saying: "But Soran, you hardly rape anyone anymore."
Because my behavior for the moment suited them, and so I can join the club, but when someone wants to take back your citizenship they can just do it.
How can I ever feel at home then?
For me it matters how I behave, while Björn Söder can do what he wants.
And then he got reported for 2 rapes and 1 molestation. See how this guy could become a neverending meme towards the good Left?
And the MSM that's advertised him?
The fine good tolerant antiracist and feminist immigrant who speaks out against social injustice!
And can be quoted saying: "Suck my dick you little whore" while forcing a girl to go down on him in a park.
Is that the definition of goodness in Sweden?
If there's anything to learn from #MeToo it's that virtues are something you do, not something you say.
I think we could all benefit more from not staring ourselves blind at labels.
Which sounds like hypocrisy considering how much I'm talking about leftist-feminists. But it's because you rape so damn much, what should I do?
I gotta say btw, the molestation is the most fucked up one of all.
Soran talked to a girl on Tinder, then they moved to Snapchat, and even though she showed no sexual interest in him
he started sending videos of himself jacking off and talking about what a little whore she is.
In other words he was quoting Erik Almqvist.
And he talked about how he's gonna fuck her. "ABOO IM GONNA FUCK YOU EY"
And I quote: "What shocked me the most is him showing his face. While screaming whore. I don't understand how he dared."
Good question, very relevant. Some might also wonder why a celebrity would even feel the need to do that.
Considering how accessible sex is for famous people. They can get it very easy, and often exactly how they want it too.
The thing about being famous is that it doesn't affect how you view yourself. Being famous is about everyone else adoring you.
But that's in their heads. Not yours. It's their thoughts, not your thoughts.
Fame doesn't change how you view yourself. If you're fundamentally insecure you will continue to be so.
And if you're insecure you'll seek out validation more than others, you'll therefore seek success and fame more than others,
because you want to be seen. You want to exercise dominance over others.
Insecurity is the key here, and feminist men can be dangerous.
Weak men that are insecure of their manliness are more unstable and therefore more dangerous.
They oppress themselves to the point where they can't really control what comes out eventually.
The psychologist Jordan Peterson said something very interesting about this, which is that feminist men can't compete in the normal male hierarchy.
So they create their own hierarchy based on manipulation and deception, where they can cheat their way to the top to win women over.
I'll link this in the video description, so look there if you want to gain deeper understanding of what's happening.
But if you look at who beats their girlfriends and rapes it's often insecure, pathetic "nice" guys.
Often it's macho stereotypes too, but they're just as insecure.
And that's Soran, he's a pussy.
So you shouldn't think nice guys are actually nice. Instead they might just be too cowardly to live out what they have inside themselves.
One study found that men who are excessive in their "manliness", to the point where they get sexist, are also more mentally unstable.
And by "sexism" they mean men who hate gays, think it's important to control women, want to be a male slut for social status, and win at everything.
But none of that is manly. It just screams insecurity.
See, a real man can engage in typically masculine activities since that is what you are.
Biology isn't an opinion, it's fact, men are what we are.
But you can also engage in activites that nurture your feminine side, with things like feelings, vulnerability, and so on.
Because a person is made up of different aspects and there's nothing manly about insecurity.
A real man can master both the emotional and the brutal, you're not afraid to use violence of course but you prefer talking your way out of trouble since it's smarter.
A real man can be nice without apologizing for having a dick. There's a difference between "nice" and "pathetic".
It's a fine line that can only be mastered if you're confident enough to dare be yourself.
Therein lies the key. Self-esteem creates the natural prerequisite for respect, and then you don't act like a jerk towards women. Or people in general.
And that's the problem with both male feminists and alpha-stereotypes.
When you refuse to acknowledge what's inside you, whether the masculine or feminine, the emotional or the violent, you end up losing control.
Rape isn't manly behavior, it's parasitic and cowardly.
A rape isn't a conquest, it's a failure. You didn't succeed in getting a woman to give herself to you so you simply took, any underdeveloped ape can act like that.
It's not impressive. To be man is to be a protector. Not a ruthless so called "conqueror".
Now feminists are talking about how "male norms" created the problem of sexual assaults, but I think too little masculinity is the real problem.
In Katarina Wennstams book "A real rapist", when she interviewed those who rehabilitate rapists,
what they observed as a common denominator is a feeling of exclusion.
They feel triggered and have a inferiority complex, and that's what drives them to commit abuse.
They're incapable of taking a "No" because it affirms their poor self-image; of not being good enough, being useless, the inferiority complex.
And yes, it's true that rapes happen easier with alcohol since it's harder to read signals when you're drunk. But that's not the biggest factor.
And yes, it's true porn can give a bad view on sex if you don't have any other positive sexual influences in life,
I mean, it kinda speaks for itself. If porn is the only sex education you have... it's gonna get bad. But it's still not the biggest factor.
The psychological and social factors are biggest here. You can't blame male norms when the absolute majority of men don't rape.
If norms were to blame it would be applicable to more than 2% of the male population.
And it's funny how "researchers" at university level claim that it's not a minority of men committing all rapes.
It's a well-established fact in criminology that a minority of the population are causing all crimes in society.
Most people aren't criminals. Yet most have had some type of experience with criminal actions in their life.
This is because a very small part of the population is attacking many different people.
Crime is often a lifestyle, that's why the police usually check for prior convictions when looking over their suspects.
Let me quote: "Örjan Falk and co-workers showed in a big study that 63% of all violent crime was done by 1% of the population."
"This corresponds with other biological research in the area. It's very well-known that the frequency of psychopaths in the population is 1%".
"Meaning 99% of people aren't psychopaths. According to gathered twin-research the past decades our qualities are controlled at least 50% by genetics."
"The same is concluded by Amir Sariaslan and co-working research teams at Karolinska institute."
"Only 3% of Sweden's population born between 1957 and 1989 were prosecuted for violent crime, up until 2009."
That says a lot.
So that feminists would use a heavy issue like rape to spread general irrelevant opinions about men, society and porn is disgusting.
Feminist bullshit won't decrease rapes, it will just make it easier for rapists to hide in plain sight.
Because then they know that if you wanna keep raping, just talk shit about porn and patriarchy sometimes and you'll get a free pass.
That's how feminists enable rape, by helping them sustain their image as "good tolerant leftist male".
Fuck, that's precisely what's happened thus far. It's not just in Sweden primarily feminist men are getting named
The trend is global, just look at USA. 3 people just at the leftist-rag Vice magazine.
And that's probably why the tye-dye witch Gudrun says that "you don't solve the problem by naming individuals".
Okay. But when Paolo Roberto pulled a joke (about #metoo) it was important to name him, and talk about "the enormous responsibility of celebrities"?
But when the majority of perpetrators named are feminists suddenly it's not important to name names. How interesting.
I'm gonna leave this article in the video description. You should read it, cuz there's insane examples of stuff that's been tolerated in the fight against capitalism.
Including trafficking and rape.
So that's kinda what this is about. Swedish media has done a lot of advertising for Soran Ismail.
So that's guilt-by-association. They don't have the upper hand anymore.
If they wanna shittalk immigration critics and try to connect us to nazism, we'll just reply:
"Yeah but you got tons of rapists in your ranks, so shut up and address the argument instead."
That's what we can do now. There's been a shift in the whole debate, the tone, the way we look at feminist men and rape as a crime.
Just look at the new hashtag that developed, #silenceaction where hundreds of actors in theater testify to a rape culture at their workplaces.
And what is the theatre world if not an arena dominated by leftist feminists?
The same could be said about media, over 4000 female journalists testified to a shitty attitude towards women.
It's not men who are pigs, it's media men. Often leftist media men.
And that's the type of men women in media are surrounded by, so it's not odd that they talk about oppressive patriarchy in Sweden!
It's their personal experience thanks to their job! Then you look at politicians that stepped forward.
And the selection speaks of a clear pattern; mostly socialists and liberals.
Then there's 1500 women in the union and yeah, it's the union.
See that's what it's all about, that's why Swedish media try to cover up as much they can. Not everything, of course, but as much they can.
When their own leftist feminist profiles get busted, because they can't do guilt-by-association anymore. They've been busted by their own method.
When someone even wants to talk to SD they're presented as a demon because they "legitimize racists!"
But rape-media is okay to legitimize? Because what's been revealed is horrendeous.
It's so much more than a few bad apples, what's been discovered is a work culture that's blatant rape culture.
Where abuse and harassment is relativized and silenced to protect the papers good reputation as "progressive feminists".
Take Aftonbladet for example, Swedens biggest paper and with a socialist feminist profile none the less.
Two of their biggest names have been known for years to harass female interns.
It's so bad that young girls who started working at Aftonbladet got warned about these men.
One woman testifies to how Aftonbladets journalist regularly said: "So when do we fuck?" and "You look horny as fuck today."
Everyone knew, but everyone accepted.
"You're one of those who travel to Africa and fuck NEGROES" the profile tells the female editor while passing by.
And nobody objects because the whole office thinks this is an improvement in later years. After all, he used to be worse.
Another woman tells how the employees would go out to the pub after their shifts, and one of the men started insisting on going to his place, doing coke and having anal sex.
The woman refused, but the man continued, and when she spoke up adamantly he got angry.
And said: "We WILL go home together and I WILL fuck you in the ass so god damn hard."
The woman started crying. This man has been allowed to act like this for over 10 years.
Because he's friends with the right people and a good journalist. And the Aftonbladet culture has been that if you don't laugh along you're labeled humorless.
He also seems close to Sofia Olsén, the psycho bitch who claims to be a feminist while telling Cissi Wallin it's irresponsible to name her rapist.
Yeah, because it would be much better if Virtanen was allowed to keep having a reputation as the "good feminist" so he can fool more women, right, Sofia?
Y'know let's get into that, because this is another thing I wanted to adress. This is an interesting detail I noticed while reading this article from 2012.
This is after Cissi Wallin reported Fredrik Virtanen, and Aftonbladet published this article without mentioning that the rapist is working at their office.
Jan Helin was responsible for Aftonbladet at that time and he claims he knew of the charges, but since it was word against word there wasn't much to do.
And he feels very sad that he didn't know of the other womens accusations! But Jan...
In this article, that you approved, Cissi mentions how she did a inquiry on her blog.
She shared her experiences of a "powerful media man" without mentioning Virtanen, then she asked if other women had similar experiences.
And that's when 20 women contacted her, independently of each other, and named Virtanen. This is written in the article that you approved.
At the same time that you knew of the police charges, and who were involved. It's extremely unlikely that neither you nor anyone at Aftonbladet knew of this.
And the victim, Cissi, backs my theory. She claims that you all knew and tried to use your lawyers to shut her up.
Several Aftonbladet employees have also said that the paper knew what was happening all along, but now say the opposite to save their reputation.
So feminist Aftonbladet knew that at least 20 women had accused Virtanen of abuse.
Why did you keep him then? Do your values really mean so little that you sacrifice them for money?
But it's also possible Aftonbladet embraced sharia law, considering socialists and islamists always had an unholy alliance,
and if you've embraced sharia you need at least 4 female witnesses to prosecute a man for rape.
And considering Aftonbladet won't settle for 20 women, I'm just gonna assume they have a harder intepretation of Islam than Saudi Arabia.
Aftonbladets new publisher isn't better, she claims to "stand for women" while shutting down the women's testimony of Aftonbladet as their workplace.
Cares more about the papers reputation than her female co-workers.
Another woman has stepped forward and said that she even left Aftonbladet because the work environment was so toxic.
Several co-workers behaved disgusting. An editorial chief touched her breast. Another co-worker sang in public about fucking her.
Which was uploaded on YouTube and got her daughter to cry when a classmate showed her the video at school.
A famous SVT-profile greeted her by saying he wants to ejaculate on her dress, and an Expressen-chief sends texts about how his dick is 23CM and he's jacking to her.
There's much more disgusting stuff to say about Aftonbladet so I really recommend you read these articles about their work environment.
And let's be clear that the Social Democrats propaganda unit isn't the only company to do this.
TV4 knew of Timells behavior but tried to cover it up too.
And Expressen, who recently claimed media never cover up unpleasant news, did everything in their power to stop an article about Expressens rape culture.
Over 20 sources told of everything from groping to rape, and one of the accused rapists hold a managerial position at the paper even today.
Expressen also had a fuck-list for interns where they would "book" women for fantasy fucks.
That's very feminist, Thomas Mattsson.
And of course Aftonbladets star, Anders Lindberg, now shares this article from Expressen. About how social media undermines democracy.
Yeah of course you journalist slime think that. If it wasn't for social media nobody would know of the disgusting shit going on inside your offices.
Social media and alternative media challenges your power monopoly, which leads to very funny disclosures.
The same papers that have been preaching equality and feminism the past 20 years have had rapists as their most prominent employees.
Like, this is companies that have consisted of rapists and people who cover up for rapists.
You can't make that up, it's satire that excels reality.
And remember everyone, rather an Angry Foreigner in the woods than a drunk Virtanen in the pub.
Don't forget to donate on Patreon if you like my channel, and have a nice day. Try not to rape anyone. We wanna be better than the left, after all.
For more infomation >> Dr. Greger in the Kitchen: My New Favorite Dessert - Duration: 5:01. 
For more infomation >> O que é DISLEXIA e por que eu mudei a letra usada no canal | Seja Uma Pessoa Melhor - Duration: 2:19. 
For more infomation >> Trying Instant Desserts from Germany - Duration: 6:45. 
For more infomation >> De volta aos palcos com Maria Cecília e Rodolfo | #SRTNJ - Brahma Sertanejo - Duration: 2:27. 
For more infomation >> 110.000.000.000 Plastikflaschen | Coca Cola - Duration: 1:04. 
For more infomation >> ILUMINE O MUNDO COM SUA LUZ - Duration: 1:44. 
For more infomation >> Aprenda a Hacer un JABÓN Que Rinde 12 Litros y Deja Sus ROPAS Increíblemente LIMPIAS! - Duration: 2:03. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét