THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY HAS
REMOVED HALF OF ITS SCIENCE BOARD.
THESE ARE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE ACADEMICS, TRAINED SCIENTISTS,
WHO DO VERY IMPORT HIS WORK PERTAINING TO OUR THINKING
WATER, OUR ENVIRONMENT, AND THE GOVERNMENT HAS DECIDED THEY
WILL NOT RENEW THE CONTRACTS OF THESE INDIVIDUALS BECAUSE
THEY WOULD RATHER REPLACE THEM WITH INDUSTRY TYPES.
SCOTT PRUIT, THE EPA ADMINISTRATOR, HAS CHOSEN
NOT TO RENEW THE TERMS OF NINE OF THE 18
MEMBER BOARD OF SCIENTIFIC COUNSELORS, WHICH ADVISES THE
EPA ON THE QUALITY AND ACCURACY OF THE SCIENCE IT PRODUCES.
THE GROUP, LARGELY MADE UP OF ACADEMICS, IS SET TO BE REPLACED
WITH INDUSTRY OFFICIALS WHO THE EPA REGULATES.
WHY NOT GIVE THEM GOVERNMENT JOBS SO THAT THEY CAN DO THINGS
THAT SUIT THEIR BEST INTERESTS, AS OPPOSED TO THE INTERESTS
OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?
THE COMMITTEE HAS BEEN A VISTA RATED, ACCORDING TO THE
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD.
"THE COMMITTEE HAS BEEN EVISCERATED.
WE ASSUMED THESE PEOPLE WOULD BE RENEWED, AND THERE WAS NO
REASON OR INDICATION THEY WOULDN'T BE.
THESE PEOPLE AREN'T OBAMA APPOINTEES, THEY ARE
SCIENTIFIC APPOINTEES.
TO HAVE A POLITICAL DECISION TO GET TO THEM IS A SHOCK" I
WOULD DISAGREE, I DON'T THINK IT IS A SHOCK, AND SO YEAH, THEY
ARE LOOKING OUT FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF THESE CORPORATIONS.
THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT, THEY DON'T
CARE ABOUT YOUR DRINKING WATER, THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT
CHEMICAL SAFETY, OR ANY OF THESE THINGS THAT THE ACADEMICS
HAVE BEEN FOCUSING ON.
I FEEL BAD FOR THEM, BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY NAœVELY
THOUGHT, THEY ARE JUST WANT TO TAKE SCIENTISTS AND FIRE
THEM AND REPLACE THEM WITH POLITICAL HACKS WHO JUST
WORKED FOR THE COMPANIES THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO ñ
THAT WE ARE SUPPOSED ACTUALLY CHECK ON.
REGULATORS ARE KIND OF LIKE COPS, RIGHT?
THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE YOU ARE BREAKING THE LAW, HURTING
PEOPLE BY PUTTING DANGEROUS STUFF IN THE WATER OR AIR, ETC.
SO THEY WERE SURPRISED TO FIND OUT THAT THEY WOULD FIRE THE
COPS AND HIGHER THE ROBBERS, BUT THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.
SCOTT PRUITT SUED THE EPA 13 TIMES.
ONE OF THE REASONS WHY HE SUED THE EPA WAS BECAUSE HE
DISAGREED WITH REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO PESTICIDES.
THE EPA HAD BANNED A CERTAIN TYPE OF PESTICIDE BECAUSE
IT WAS FOUND TO BE DANGEROUS, NOT ONLY TO THE ENVIRONMENT
BUT TO HUMANS, AND SCOTT PRUITT WAS LIKE, I DON'T DISAGREE
ñ I DON'T AGREE, GOING TO GO AHEAD AND SUE THEM.
ARE YOU A SCIENTIST?
ARE YOU AN EXPERT?
OR ARE YOU A POLITICAL HACK?
HE HAS TAKEN THE SAME MONEY FROM ñ HE HAS TAKEN MONEY FROM THOSE
SAME CORPORATIONS, I KNOW THAT COMES AS A SHOCK TO YOU GUYS,
AND WHEN HE WAS GOVERNOR OF OKLAHOMA HE WOULD SOMETIMES CUT
AND PASTE THINGS THAT THE LOBBYISTS HAD SENT HIM, AND THEN
SUE THE EPA WITH THEIR OWN WORDS.
AND BY THE WAY, SINCE HE BECAME HEAD OF THE EPA, THAT SAME
PESTICIDE?
HE REMOVED THE BAN ON IT, EVEN THOUGH SCIENTISTS SAID THAT
IT HURTS CHILDREN AND FARMWORKERS.
BUT WHO CARES ABOUT THEM?
BECAUSE LITERALLY, A SPOKESMAN FOR THE AGENCY, HENCE SCOTT
PRUITT, SAYS THE ADMINISTRATOR, THAT SCOTT PRUITT, BELIEVES WE
SHOULD HAVE PEOPLE ON THIS SCIENTIFIC BOARD WHO UNDERSTAND
THE IMPACT OF REGULATIONS ON THE REGULATED COMMUNITY.
THEY DON'T MEAN YOUR COMMUNITY, YOUR FAMILIES OR WHERE THEY
LIVE, THE REGULATED COMMUNITY MEANS THE BUSINESSES WHO
ARE BEING REGULATED.
SO THEY SAY, WELL WE NEED THEIR REPRESENTATIVES TO UNREGULATE
THEM.
WHAT AM I, FRANKIE?
A PAINTED AS, THESE POOR GUYS HAVE NO REPRESENTATION,
THEY HAVE NO VOICE.
THEY HAVE GIANT LOBBIES.
THEY HAVE MORE REPRESENTATION THAN THE AVERAGE AMERICAN
DOES, AND THEY WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO.
THEY ALREADY HAVE ALL THESE LOBBYISTS, THEY ALREADY
PRESSURE THE EPA, THEY MAKE THEIR CASE TO THE EPA AND
THE POLITICIANS NONSTOP.
IT'S NOT LIKE, I'VE NEVER HEARD OF THEM.
THIS COMPANY THAT MAKES PESTICIDES CARES ABOUT THIS
ISSUE?
I WONDER WHY THEY DIDN'T BRING IT UP?
THEY BROUGHT IT UP, TO THE TUNE OF $200 MILLION, CONSTANTLY.
SO, THE OPPOSITE OF CORPORATE HACKS WHO ARE THERE TO
DEREGULATE, ARE NOT REAL SCIENTISTS.
THE OPPOSITE, AND THIS MAY BE UNFAIR, OUR ENVIRONMENT
ACTIVISTS.
SCIENTISTS ARE NOT ON THAT SPECTRUM.
AND THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE THIS JOB.
THIS JOB IS DETERMINING IF A PESTICIDE IS DANGEROUS OR
NOT, BECAUSE WE MIGHT NEED PESTICIDES, AND IF THEY ARE
SAFE, GOOD.
BUT IF THEY ARE NOT SAFE, WE DON'T WANT THE KIDS AND THE
FARMWORKERS TO DIE OR GET SICK RIGHT?
IF A DEMOCRAT CAME IN AND SAID, I DON'T WANT SCIENTISTS,
I'M ONLY GOING TO PUT ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISTS
THERE, PEOPLE WOULD LOSE IT.
THEY WOULD BE LIKE, HOW DARE YOU!
YOU ARE TURNING OVER THE
EPA TO GREENPEACE!
WHICH IS MONUMENTALLY UNFAIR, BECAUSE THE
EPA, GREENPEACE AND ENVIRONMENT ACTIVISTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE
IN SCIENCE.
THEY WANT TO SERVE THE PEOPLE
THAT PAY THEM, AND NOT THE
PEOPLE WHO THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT.
IT IS THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT, AND THEY ARE
GOING TO DO THE EXACT OPPOSITE.
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT DONALD TRUMP GETS YOU.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét