THE OCCULT SECRETS OF LANGUAGE AS A METHOD OF MIND CONTROL
The �spell� in spelling was meant to create a magical trance over you � to obstruct
the true meaning of the essence of the Creator. Many occult (33-degree freemasons, illuminati,
cabal, etc.) secrets are hidden within spelling and grammar, but it doesn�t take much digging
to reveal them.
For instance, as per Thoth, the Egyptian God of learning, wisdom and magic, (also depicted
in ancient hieroglyphs as a man-bird) the purpose of spelling is to cast magic energy
with a definite purpose. Myths surrounding Thoth even say he created himself through
language � but this is eerily egoistic, and suggests deep occult powers beyond just
being able to win a spelling bee.
There is an interesting parallel in the Christian bible, in the Gospel of St. John as well:
�In the beginning was the word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.�
If the occultists want to control a population they simply delete, distort, and generalize
the truth. This is the Meta Model used behind most of MK Ultra and other mind control techniques
utilized by the Deep State. Language and grammar are one of the primary means to distort truth.
When powerful people utilize certain speech patterns, they appear to know the truth about
something, but they don�t truly understand what other people think, feel, and believe.
This is irrelevant, because the aim is to convince them through a �spell� � what
is �true� to the Occult Paradigm.
To see an example of this in action, we could look at thousands of hours of political speeches,
but we�ll keep it simple and direct for now.
Let�s say a leader wants to convince the general population that a law to mandate Common
Core teaching standards is a good thing. They will use language like this:
�All sensible parents agree that children should be able to meet certain academic standards
where developmentally appropriate.� Let�s break this one sentence down to find
all its �spells.�
Firstly, there is a forgone conclusion within the phrase, �all sensible parents.� This
is called a lost performative. It assumes that something is true without any concrete
proof. Who determines what is sensible? What academic standards are we talking about? Who
will determine them?
The next problem is with the absolutism of the statement. Should you disagree that �all
parents agree� you are automatically in a position of opposition to power. You�re
bucking a �truth� that everyone else has already accepted.
Then, �certain academic standards� is also rife with ambiguity. It�s a vague term
meant to cast a large net so that as many people as possible will be caught in it. This
phrase also uses nominalization. How would you know when you�ve achieved �developmentally
appropriate standards?� Is this some arbitrary set of rules meant to teach our children nothing
at all, or something of great importance? Time has shown that Common Core did exactly
what its makers promised � confused the hell out of kids and teachers alike with double
speak and backwards math, but the �spell� to get it implemented worked.
Finally, we have, �where developmentally appropriate.� This is more lost performative
phrasing. It implies a judgement about child development, without taking any responsibility
for what that is.
Consider that this is a single sentence, with spelling and grammar in a sea of the CIA-sponsored,
occult-referenced, decades-long, interdisciplinary study into mind control.
You need to explore way back before Operation Paperclip, and into the deepest known annals
of human history to find the magic of language and its use by occultists � this is what
informs all mind control programs today.
Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against
his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self-preservation?�
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét