Baby Learn colors for kids Frozen Elsa Angela Kinder Surprise Egg Finger Family
-------------------------------------------
LIVE! Senate Hearing: FAKE NEWS - Duration: 6:05:48.
For more infomation >> LIVE! Senate Hearing: FAKE NEWS - Duration: 6:05:48. -------------------------------------------
Tu Kuja Man Kuja | Owais Raza Qadri ﺗﻮ ﮐﺠﺎ ﻣﻦ ﮐﺠﺎ، New Amazing Naat 2017 - Duration: 21:35.
Owais Raza Qadri
-------------------------------------------
Болгария. Октябрь. Не ожидали таких новостей от погоды в Варне. - Duration: 3:12.
For more infomation >> Болгария. Октябрь. Не ожидали таких новостей от погоды в Варне. - Duration: 3:12. -------------------------------------------
一酸化炭素の発生に気づいた猫。飼い主さんの命を救うため、ドアを何度も強打し・・・【感動する話】 - Duration: 2:19.
For more infomation >> 一酸化炭素の発生に気づいた猫。飼い主さんの命を救うため、ドアを何度も強打し・・・【感動する話】 - Duration: 2:19. -------------------------------------------
Eren And Beast Titan Team Up? Attack on Titan Chapter 98 Review Shingeki no Kyojin - Duration: 7:34.
Attack on Titan chapter 98! Another meaty chapter for Isayama. So what's up
guys Foxen here! Let's just go ahead and jump into this review and let's start
with the biggest thing out of this chapter, that freakin cliffhanger ending!
I mean attack on Titan has had some good ones but this one by far is the best one,
at least from recent chapters. It is funny how Reiner ends up meeting an
older Eren in some basement. Is the solution to the current events gonna be
sparked from what comes out of this basement? It just brings a funny parallel
to what happened before with the other basement, but for their actual meeting. I
could only imagine what this conversation is gonna be like. Either way
like I mentioned in my recent Theory video I really don't think it's gonna be
hard at all to convince Reiner to join up with Eren, and there really might be
another reason for why this is gonna be easy, and that is Eren's love letter. It's
practically confirmed that Eren's been exchanging letters with this older
brother Zeke. At the beginning of the chapter I just thought how was strange
that Zeke mentioned something about acting like an older brother. I mean what
what this guy know about that? And then later you see Eren with that baseball
glove. The only two guys you saw playing baseball included Zeke. And then
right before the festival started he had Zeke encouraging Reiner to follow Falco.
If that doesn't confirm it I don't know what will! Of course besides the next
chapter I do think this is part of Zeke's way of testing Reiner too. If Zeke
just told him he was working with Eren I'm sure that Reiner would blindly
follow him but right here Zeke wants to see Reiner making that choice on his own.
But let's say just by some chance that it is not Zeke I'd be in complete shock.
For now that's what I'm gonna be assuming Eren and Zeke must have been
able to work something out over that one-month period.
You saw how Eren mentioned how he's gonna return home after the festival so
whatever they're planning is gonna happen really soon. It's gonna be the
Attack Titan, the beast Titan, plus two armored Titan versus the Warhammer Titan!
This does bring up the question about who else is gonna come along. It's
basically all the Titan shifters versus the world.
I think Pieck and her Cart Titan will follow Zeke, hell was she might already
be aware about the plan. As for the Jaws Titan I wouldn't be
surprised if he didn't follow along but right now I do see him joining up with
Eren too, especially after seeing some other events from Ymir's memories.
This means it's gonna come down to all the Titans versus the WarHammer Titan.
And let's not forget one major thing Eren should have the coordinate power as
long as he gets friendly with Zeke. This just makes you wonder even more what is
a Warhammer Titans ability. It's gotta have some super special ultimate power
to fight these guys off. And since we're talking about the Warhammer Titan let's
talk about Willy Tybur and yes officially it is WiWillylie not Billy which
really I'm really glad about that. So far from what you've seen Willy has been
seen as this perfect smart individual. In this chapter you kind of see that he's
beloved by a bunch of other nation's leaders so he's got quite the influence.
Willy practically has them eating out of his hand with the festival almost here
Willy mentioned the previous night about revealing his ultimate solution there.
It sounds like this final solution type of plan. I mean it's really not hard
to draw the parallel what all the Nazi similarities already seen. Does Willy's
master plan really include exterminating all other Eldians? I think there has to be
more to his plan especially when you consider the words he used. He mentions
Titans instead of explicitly saying Eldians. Next up let's go back to the
beginning of the chapter. At the start you have Reiner helping out with the
upcoming attack on Paradise Island. It's now literally gonna be Attack on Titan! I
do like how they address the issue of not attacking from the north. Right here
Reiner even goes further and brings up all the possibilities to consider. It's
funny how the military guy takes offense to Reiner's comment really quickly. I mean
are you just gonna ignore the advice from someone that was there for years?
This really further highlights how incompetent the Marley military is.
Next up let me also bring up the Asian clan. You saw this Asian woman from that
clan at that party before the festival. Could she be related to Mikasa and her
mother? From the brief interaction and scene that she does not hate Eldians,
perhaps even sympathies with them. And in that final shot you see this a symbol
behind them hmm interesting. I'm guessing really soon we're gonna find out the
importance of that Asian clan, otherwise the mention of her clan
wouldn't have gotten such a big focus here if it wasn't important. I also
noticed how she was wearing a kimono so this Asian clan is confirmed to be this
world's version of Japanese. The real question is are they
gonna side with the Eldians? Perhaps Hange and friends already gathered a new ally!
Up next let's talk about Dr. Yeager. Eren just so happened to run into
Grisha's father aka his grandfather by chance and I gotta hand it to Isayama
he really got me with the scene. I was
thinking, oh no Eren your covers totally blown! Except that wasn't the case. It
turns out that dr. Yeager is just some loony in a mental hospital. The question
now is why is he there? Whatever happened to him? Is it simply due to old age or
could dr. Yeager be suffering from some sort of PTSD?
It also has weird how he managed to figure out what Eren was making Falco
do. I mean if this mentally ill guy was ever to figure it out it makes you
wonder who else noticed. And right before he broke down it really seemed like this
guy had a lot of regrets. And then also take a notice of how he looks in this
final shot of dr. Yeager breaking down. That expression really reminds you'd
something you see on Titans. I don't think that's a coincidence. Let me also
mention some of the warriors Gabi and Falco. Both these two got a lot of focus
in this chapter for Falco it was mostly from his involvement with the older
Aaron but there was something extra Falco managed to surpass Gabi for the
first time ever they were making such a big deal out of it I'm gonna take a
guess I was writers influenced Falco really is gonna be the one that gets
picked to be the next armored Titan and Gabi also got a good amount of
screen time I'm really starting to feel for her character there was that moment
of Falco confessing his feelings to her but it turns out that gabby is have
stances every steuby there was also that line from Gabi that was really on the
news about how things were about to change
it's almost like Gabi can sense the future hmm unfortunately I don't think
either of these guys will get any Titan abilities right now we're supposed to
feel even closer to them with Gabi sudden interest into Willie I really
think some heavy des Plantes are being set up but who knows maybe you see
something different Dec are these characters making it out
alive oh so here's some poni scenes that I really liked the first is Gabi waking
up it was a fun little scene but specifically no it is a close-up on her
face this really reminds about dito sama could be on the characters when he
really wants to Gabi right here is also reminded me of a mixture between Erin
Emmy Casa she's like a little badass in the making the other scene I really
loved was how Reiner was treating them to different foods
this included pizza I think without a doubt
Ryan is thinking back to everyone he's lost back on Paradise Island this
includes both the warrior group and the scales all right so now let me hear from
you question of the day what do you think Rhino will do next
is he gonna side with Aaron and Zeke or when they go tell Willie about what's
going on and how do you think the events of this festival are gonna play out I
got a feeling that the entire next chapter is gonna be Reiner and Aaron
talking combined with some Zeke flashbacks as always be sure to gives us
colossal thumbs up and subscribe especially if you're excited for the
next chapter definitely go ahead and check out my recent attack on Titan
Theory videos another anime news videos and I'll see you guys later
-------------------------------------------
Tillerson On Calling Trump A "F*cking Moron" (VIDEO) - Duration: 11:49.
NBC NEWS HAS SPOKEN TO OVER A DOZEN WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS,
BOTH FORMER AND CURRENT, ALL OF WHOM WERE ANONYMOUS, AND FOUND
OUT THERE IS A LOT OF TENSION BETWEEN REX TILLERSON AND DONALD
TRUMP.
REX TILLERSON OF COURSE IS THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND
THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS EXAMPLES OF DONALD TRUMP
UNDERCUTTING REX TILLERSON, THERE HAVE BEEN EXAMPLES OF REX
TILLERSON PUBLICLY MAKING STATEMENTS THAT SEEM TO CONFLICT
WITH DONALD TRUMP AND SEEM TO SUGGEST THAT HE'S NOT REALLY A
FAN OF THE PRESIDENT, BUT BEFORE WE REMIND YOU OF ALL THOSE
EXAMPLES LET ME GIVE YOU THE LATEST UPDATES ON WHAT IS
HAPPENING WITHIN THE WHITE HOUSE.
ACCORDING TO NBC NEWS --
>>APPARENTLY REX TILLERSON HAS HAD VERY CLOSE TIES WITH THE BOY
SCOUTS, HE WAS ONCE PRESIDENT OF THE BOY SCOUTS, SO HE WASN'T TOO
HAPPY WITH THE WAY THAT THAT SPEECH WENT DOWN --
>>WHEN IT COMES TO OTHER CABINET MEMBERS AND OTHER WHITE
HOUSE OFFICIALS TRYING TO CONVINCE HIM TO STAY, THERE WERE
A NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT WERE LISTED IN THIS NBC NEWS PIECE,
ONE OF WHICH WAS MIKE PENCE, THE VICE PRESIDENT.
ACCORDING TO NBC
NEWS --
>>THEN YOU HAVE JOHN KELLY AND MATTIS, WHO HAVE DONE WHAT THEY
COULD TO CONVINCE TILLERSON TO REMAIN IN THE POSITION HE'S IN,
MOSTLY FOR POLITICAL REASONS.
THERE'S BEEN SO MUCH CHAOS THAT
KELLY AND MATTIS REALIZE THAT TILLERSON LEAVING WOULD MAKE
THINGS WORSE, SO ACCORDING TO THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS WHO
SPOKE TO NBC NEWS HE WAS CONVINCED TO STAY EVEN THOUGH HE
HAS BEEN UNHAPPY.
I WANT TO GO TO A VIDEO THAT HAS TO DO WITH
TILLERSON ALLEGEDLY CALLING TRUMP A MORON.
>>THE VICE PRESIDENT HAS NEVER HAD TO PERSUADE ME TO
REMAIN SECRETARY OF STATE BECAUSE I'VE NEVER
CONSIDERED LEAVING THIS POST.
>>I THINK YOU HAD A CHANCE TO LISTEN TO WHAT THE SECRETARY HAD
TO SAY, OBVIOUS PUSHBACK THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT
FORESHADOWED, YET A DOZEN SOURCES ARE TELLING US THERE IS
REAL TENSION BETWEEN THESE TWO.
>>PUSHBACK BUT HE DIDN'T DENY IT --
>>DIDN'T DENY THE MORON PIECE.
>>MY SOURCE DIDN'T SAY JUST A MORON, HE SAID AN EFFING MORON.
>>I MEAN, HE'S RIGHT.
>>WHY IS IT SO HARD TO BELIEVE THAT HE HAD A MOMENT OF CLARITY?
AND WHAT A GREAT WORKPLACE, WHERE YOUR DIPLOMAT IS MIKE
PENCE, THAT'S YOUR PEACEMAKER, THE GUY WHO THINKS THERE SHOULD
BE ELECTROTHERAPY ON HOMOSEXUALS AND WAS TOO CONSERVATIVE
FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA, THAT'S YOUR PEACEMAKER.
>>A MAN WHO THINKS ABORTED FETUSES NEED TO HAVE PROPER
BURIALS.
>>THAT'S YOUR VOICE OF REASON BETWEEN THOSE TWO.
>>WE LIVE IN A SCARY PLACE WHEN THAT IS THE VOICE OF REASON.
I
WAS MAKING THE POINT EARLIER THIS WEEK THAT IT'S LITTLE
CONCERNING THAT THE FORMER CEO OF EXXON MOBIL SEEMS TO BE ONE
OF THE ONLY INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THIS WHITE HOUSE THAT HAS
MOMENTS OF CLARITY, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO THINGS LIKE, I
DON'T KNOW, NUCLEAR WAR.
THAT'S CRAZY.
I CAN UNDERSTAND
TILLERSON BEING FRUSTRATED WITH SOMEONE LIKE DONALD TRUMP, WHO
DOESN'T REALLY SEEM TO HAVE ANY TYPE OF CONSISTENT FOREIGN
POLICY, WHO SEEMS TO ACT ERRATICALLY AND BASED ON EMOTION
AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT, AND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT FOREIGN POLICY
ISSUES THAT RISK THE LIVES OF POTENTIALLY MILLIONS OF PEOPLE,
SO TILLERSON, ALTHOUGH I DISAGREE WITH HIM ON A NUMBER OF
THINGS, AT LEAST UNDERSTANDS THE WEIGHT OF THESE ISSUES.
WHEREAS
DONALD TRUMP IS LIKE IT'S FOUR IN THE MORNING, LET ME TWEET
NONSENSE THAT COULD PUT PEOPLE IN HARM'S WAY.
TILLERSON DID
RESPOND TO THIS NBC PIECE, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING, AND I
WANT YOU TO PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO WHAT HE DID ADMIT AND WHAT HE
DID NOT.
>>THE VICE PRESIDENT HAS NEVER HAD TO PERSUADE ME TO REMAIN AS
SECRETARY OF STATE BECAUSE I HAVE NEVER CONSIDERED LEAVING
THIS POST.
LET ME TELL YOU WHAT I'VE LEARNED ABOUT THIS
PRESIDENT, WHOM I DID NOT KNOW BEFORE TAKING THIS OFFICE.
HE
LOVES HIS COUNTRY.
HE PUTS AMERICANS AND AMERICA FIRST.
HE'S SMART, HE DEMANDS RESULTS WHEREVER HE GOES, AND HE HOLDS
THOSE AROUND HIM ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHETHER THEY'VE DONE THE JOB
HE'S ASKED THEM TO DO.
ACCOUNTABILITY IS ONE OF THE
BEDROCK VALUES THE PRESIDENT AND I SHARE.
>>HOW PAINFUL WAS THAT.
>>ACCOUNTABILITY, HE'S ALL ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY.
THE BEAUTY
OF TRUMP IS HOW HE MAKES OTHERWISE RESPECTED PEOPLE LOOK
RIDICULOUS.
REX TILLERSON, FORMER HEAD OF EXXON OR
WHATEVER, NORMALLY RESPECTED, HE MAKES IT LOOK LIKE A JACKASS.
ONE LIE AFTER ANOTHER.
HE'S REALLY SMART, HE'S REALLY GOOD
FOR PEOPLE, HE'S A PATRIOT, AND I LOVE HIM.
>>I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY HE FEELS THE NEED TO BACKPEDAL
HERE.
ALL YOU HAVE TO BE IS LIKE, HAVE YOU SEEN TRUMP?
DO
YOU THINK HE'S AN EASY GUY TO WORK FOR?
LOOK, IT'S NOT EASY
BEING HERE.
YES I THINK ABOUT LEAVING DAILY, CAN YOU BLAME ME?
>>I WAS TELLING YOU OFF AIR, IT'S FUNNY THAT TILLERSON, IS
BREAKING POINT WAS THE BOY SCOUTS SPEECH.
BECAUSE WHY?
BECAUSE NOW REX TILLERSON IS CLOSE WITH THE BOY SCOUTS, USED
TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE BOY SCOUTS, HE'S AN EAGLE SCOUT
HIMSELF, NOW HE'S EMBARRASSED.
NOW IT AFFECTS HIM PERSONALLY SO
HE UNDERSTANDS WHY TRUMP IS SUCH A JACKASS BECAUSE IT AFFECTED
HIM PERSONALLY.
LIKE A CLASSIC REPUBLICAN.
>>LET'S HEAR FROM TILLERSON IF HE EVER CALLED THE
PRESIDENT A MORON.
>>DID YOU CALL THE PRESIDENT A MORON?
>>I'M NOT GOING TO DEAL WITH PETTY STUFF LIKE THAT.
THIS IS WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND ABOUT WASHINGTON.
>>HE DID NOT DENY THAT HE CALLED TRUMP MORON.
I BELIEVE
THAT HE CALLED TRUMP A MORON, HE APPARENTLY DID SO PRETTY OPENLY
DURING THAT MEETING.
>>WHAT PART OF WASHINGTON DID HE UNDERSTAND?
WHEN THE SECRETARY
OF STATE CALLED THE PRESIDENT A FUCKING MORON, THAT'S GOING TO
GET REPORTED IN THE PRESS -- I DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT?
YOU DON'T
UNDERSTAND THAT THEY HAVE ELECTRONIC WAYS OF
COMMUNICATING?
WHAT DOES HE NOT UNDERSTAND?
THAT'S NEWS WHEN THE
SECRETARY OF STATE BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT AN EFFING MORON.
>>I REMEMBER IN THE SUMMER WHEN TILLERSON TOOK A VACATION TO
TEXAS, PEOPLE THOUGHT THAT'S WHEN HE WAS GONE, AND THAT'S
ACCORDING TO WHAT WE SEE HERE THAT IS WHEN MIKE PENCE
CONVINCED HIM TO AMEND THE SITUATION WITH TRUMP.
THERE WERE
SOME PUBLIC DISPLAYS OF TENSION WE WILL GET TO, BUT FIRST A
RESPONSE FROM TRUMP ON THIS NBC PIECE, HE SAYS --
>>I LOVE HOW ANY TIME HE GETS HIS FEELINGS HURT AND HIS EGO
BRUISED HE TRIES TO SELL IT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS AN INSULT
TO AMERICA.
NO, IT'S NOT AN INSULT TO AMERICA.
NBC NEWS
ISN'T, IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, DOING SOME SORT OF DISSERVICE TO
AMERICANS.
YOU FEEL LIKE IT'S A DISSERVICE TO YOU BECAUSE IT
HURT YOUR FEELINGS, BUT DID TILLERSON CALL YOU A MORON?
YEAH.
DO MOST AMERICANS THINK YOU ARE A MORON?
YEAH.
DOES THE
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY CONSIDER YOU A MORON?
YEAH.
GET YOUR
FEELINGS HURT, YOU'RE AN IDIOT.
>>[LAUGHTER]
>>AND THE REASON I BELIEVE TILLERSON CALLED HIM A MORON IS
BECAUSE HE COULD BARELY CONTAIN HIMSELF DURING SOME INTERVIEWS.
LET ME GIVE YOU THE FIRST EXAMPLE, FOLLOWING THE HATE
RALLY THAT TOOK PLACE IN CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA AND
FOLLOWING TRUMP'S REFUSAL TO CONDEMN THOSE ON THE RIGHT, THE
NEO-NAZIS, THE WHITE SUPREMACISTS, TILLERSON WAS
ASKED ABOUT TRUMP'S RESPONSE AND HE MADE IT APPARENT HE DIDN'T
AGREE AND WASN'T HAPPY, TAKE A LOOK.
>>WHEN THE PRESIDENT GETS INTO THE CONTROVERSY HE DOES AND THE
U.N.
COMMITTEE RESPONSE HOW THEY DO, THEY BEGIN TO DOUBT WHETHER
WE ARE LIVING THOSE VALUES.
>>I DON'T BELIEVE ANYONE DOUBTS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S VALUES OR
THE COMMITMENT OF THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT OR THE
GOVERNMENT'S AGENCIES TO ADVANCING THOSE VALUES AND
DEFENDING THOSE VALUES.
>>AND THE PRESIDENT'S VALUES?
>>THE PRESIDENT SPEAK FOR HIMSELF, CHRIS.
>>ARE YOU SEPARATING YOURSELF FROM THAT, SIR?
>>I'VE MADE MY OWN COMMENTS TO OUR VALUES IN A SPEECH I
GAVE TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT THIS PAST WEEK.
>>SO I'M NOT NOT SEPARATING MYSELF.
YOU COULD HAVE TRANSLATED THAT ONE.
>>THE PRESIDENT SPEAK FOR HIMSELF.
AND THERE IS THE
EXAMPLE EARLIER THIS WEEK WHERE TILLERSON WAS VERY PUBLICLY
UNDERCUT BY DONALD TRUMP IN REGARD TO NORTH KOREAN FOREIGN
POLICY.
TILLERSON WAS ATTEMPTING TO DE-ESCALATE THE SITUATION
WITH NORTH KOREA, SO WE DON'T ENGAGE IN NUCLEAR WAR, AND TRUMP
DIDN'T LIKE THAT SO HE TWEETED ABOUT IT AND SAID TILLERSON
NEEDS TO STOP GO SHEETING WITH LITTLE ROCKET MAN. AND TILLERSON
DIDN'T LIKE THAT, HE WAS ASKED ABOUT IT, HERE IS HIS REACTION.
>>THE BACK-AND-FORTH TWEETS WITH KIM JONG-UN, HOW IS THAT
HELPFUL TO THE SITUATION?
>>WE WILL CONTINUE TO PURSUE OUR DIPLOMATIC EFFORTS AND HOPE
THAT'S THE WAY WE WILL SOLVE IT, THANK YOU.
>>AGAIN, TRUMP VERY PUBLICLY UNDERCUT HIS OWN SECRETARY OF
STATE ON TWITTER, AND EVEN AFTER HE DID SO TILLERSON REITERATED
THAT HE PLANS ON PURSUING A DIPLOMATIC APPROACH TO FURTHER
DE-ESCALATE SO WE DON'T HAVE TO ENGAGE IN SOMETHING THAT COULD
BE POTENTIALLY DISASTROUS FOR THE LIVES OF MILLIONS.
AGAIN
IT'S CRAZY, EXXON MOBIL CEO, FORMER EXXONMOBIL CEO, IS THE
REASONABLE ONE HERE.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Admin Sweeps Its Own Study Under The Rug - Duration: 4:52.
ANOTHER DENIAL THAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS
PUTTING INTO PLAY IS DENIAL ABOUT THE POSITIVE IMPACT
OF REFUGEES IN THIS COUNTRY.
AND AS TRUMP IS AT THE UNGA AND HE IS TALKING TO THESE
COUNTRIES, REFUGEES AND THE TREATMENT OF REFUGEES IS A
SUBJECT THAT ALWAYS COMES UP.
HE'S GOING TO BE THERE WEDNESDAY AND THURSDAY.
HE'S GOING TO GET AN EARFULL FROM ALL OF THESE OTHER LEADERS
ABOUT THE WAY THAT AMERICANS TREAT REFUGEES, BUT THERE'S A
STUDY AND I WANT TO BRING THIS UP, THAT FOUND:
THAT'S NOT 269 DOLLARS.
THAT'S $269 BILLION.
$63 BILLION IS EXACTLY THE NUMBER THAT DONALD TRUMP ASKED
FOR TO GO INTO AFGHANISTAN OR THE SENATE VOTED FOR TO
CONTINUE WARS IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAN AND IRAQ.
THAT'S HOW MUCH THE REFUGEES ARE CREATING IN THIS COUNTRY,
ALTHOUGH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ARE
REJECTING THOSE NUMBERS SAYING THERE'S A NET EFFECT OF THAT.
SO THEY ARE SAYING THAT THEY ARE A DRAIN ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE,
ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY.
THE FACTS PROVE OTHERWISE.
THEY DO BECAUSE SINCE THEY ARE REFUGEES, THEY ARE MORE
LIKELY TO TAKE JOBS THAT AVERAGE AMERICANS DO NOT WANT TO
TAKE AND I KNOW THAT PEOPLE ARE IN DENIAL ABOUT THAT, BUT
THAT IS WHAT HAPPENS.
THEY DO PAY STATE, FEDERAL TAXES, SALES TAXES IF THEY
ARE IN A STATE THAT HAS THEM.
THEY DO CONTRIBUTE TO THE ECONOMY AND IT'S A
SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT AND SO IF THE ARGUMENT IS, NO, THEY ARE
GOING TO DRAIN OUR RESOURCES, THAT IS JUST A FLAT OUT LIE
AND THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TRIED TO HIDE THE STUDY.
THEY TRIED TO COMPLETELY PRETEND LIKE IT DID NOT EXIST AND
IT REMINDED ME OF WHAT NIXON DID WITH THE SHAFER REPORT BACK
WHEN HE WAS PRESIDENT.
DURING THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION, HE REALLY WANTED TO RAMP UP
THE WAR ON DRUGS AND GO AFTER PEOPLE WHO WERE USING
MARIJUANA AND SO HE COMMISSIONED A STUDY THAT WAS HEADED BY
GOVERNOR RAYMOND SHAFER AT THE TIME.
RAYMOND SHAFER GOES IN, HAS HIS COMMISSION.
THEY DO THE STUDY AND FIND OUT MARIJUANA IS ACTUALLY NOT A
PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN.
IT'S NOT SOMETHING WORTH WASTING RESOURCES ON AND ADDING TO
THIS WAR ON DRUGS AND NIXON DID NOT LIKE THE RESULTS BECAUSE
HE WANTED TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE, RIGHT?
HE WANTED TO GO AFTER MEXICANS WHO WERE CAUGHT WITH POT SO HE'S
LIKE SHAFER REPORT, THAT'S GREAT.
LET'S MOVE ON WITH OUR LIVES.
WHAT TRUMP IS DOING WITH THIS INFORMATION FROM THIS STUDY
REMINDS ME A LOT OF WHAT NIXON DID AND IN THIS CASE, YOU
ARE PLAYING WITH PEOPLES LIVES.
THESE ARE PEOPLE ñ WE ARE THINKING ABOUT THEM AS
NUMBERS, WE'RE THINKING ABOUT, WHAT'S IN IT FOR US?
KEEP IN MIND THESE ARE PEOPLE'S LIVES THAT WE ARE MESSING WITH.
WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT REFUGEES AND THEY TALK ABOUT THE NEGATIVE
AFFECT, THEY ALSO TALK ABOUT THIS LOOMING THREAT OF
TERRORISM, THAT THERE ARE FOLKS RUSHING TO THE
BORDERS, BUT YOU HAVE A NET POSITIVE HERE THAT YOU COULD
APPLY TO SOME KIND OF BETTERMENTS OF YOUR SCREENING
DOUBLE SECRET PROBATION PROCEDURES THAT YOU HAVE PUT IN
PLACE TO VET WHOSE COMING INTO THE COUNTRY SO NOT ONLY ARE
REFUGEES A BOOMING BUSINESS, BUT THEY PAY FOR THE UPKEEP OF THAT
BUSINESS IF YOU ARE EARNESTLY MEANING WHAT YOU ARE SAYING,
WHICH IS THAT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PEOPLE WHO
ARE COMING IN ARE PROPERLY VETTED.
YOU HAVE A BUDGET FOR THAT AND IT IS BAKED INTO REFUGEES
THEMSELVES.
YOU'VE TURNED A PROFIT.
ISN'T THAT ALL YOU EVER WANT TO DO?
THEY TURNED A $63 BILLION PROFIT.
YOU WOULD THINK THE REFUGEE BUSINESS WOULD BE SOMETHING
THAT WOULD BE JUMPING ON BECAUSE OF THAT ALONE AND LISTEN,
THESE STORIES ARE CONNECTED.
YOU HAVE A REPORT FROM SCIENTISTS SAYING WHAT IS GOING
ON
WITH THE CLIMATE AND IT IS BEING TOSSED ASIDE BY THE TRUMP
ADMINISTRATION.
YOU HAVE A REPORT SAYING THAT REFUGEES CREATE $63
BILLION IN PROFIT FOR THIS COUNTRY AND THE TRUMP
ADMINISTRATION SAYING, THAT IS NOT TRUE.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Taking Healthcare On By Himself - Duration: 9:24.
SENATE REPUBLICANS FAILED TO PASS THE REPEAL EFFORT OR A
REPLACEMENT FOR THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT WITH A SIMPLE MAJORITY,
AND TRUMP CLAIMS THAT THEY ARE GOING TO TRY THEIR HAND AT THIS
AGAIN NEXT YEAR, AND THAT THEY ESSENTIALLY HAVE ENOUGH VOTES TO
MAKE IT HAPPEN, ALTHOUGH WE ALL KNOW THAT'S NOT THE CASE.
THEY
COULDN'T EVEN PASS IT WITH A SIMPLE MAJORITY.
SPEAKING TO THE
PRESS, TRUMP SAID THAT HE WILL TAKE MATTERS INTO HIS OWN HANDS
WHEN IT COMES TO ONE PARTICULAR ISSUE IN REGARD TO HEALTHCARE --
HE WANTS TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO BUY HEALTH INSURANCE ACROSS
STATE LINES.
I'M CONSIDERING AN EXECUTIVE ORDER ON ASSOCIATIONS AND THAT
WILL TAKE CARE OF A TREMENDOUS NUMBER OF PEOPLE WITH REGARD TO
HEALTHCARE, AND I'LL PROBABLY BE SIGNING A VERY MAJOR EXECUTIVE
ORDER WHERE PEOPLE CAN GO OUT ACROSS STATE LINES AND BUY THEIR
OWN HEALTHCARE, AND THAT WILL BE PROBABLY SIGNED NEXT WEEK, IT'S
BEING FINISHED NOW.
THE REST OF HIS QUOTE WAS IT'S GOING TO COVER A LOT OF
TERRITORY AND A LOT OF PEOPLE, MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
I'LL PROBABLY BE SIGNING A VERY MAJOR EXECUTIVE ORDER.
THAT
WILL ALLOW PEOPLE TO CROSS STATE LINES, DO A LOT OF THINGS.
BUT I MEAN, I'LL PROBABLY --
WHAT KIND OF PRESIDENT SAYS I'LL PROBABLY DO ANYTHING?
WHAT KIND OF PRESIDENTS AS DO A LOT OF THINGS?
I'LL PROBABLY BE SIGNING -- THEN SIGN IT.
YOU ARE THE
EXECUTIVE.
IT'S NOT JUST A MAJOR ORDER, IT'S A VERY MAJOR ORDER.
IT'S VERY MAJOR.
LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THIS
EXECUTIVE ORDER, IF IT'S FOUND TO BE ONE THAT COULD EVEN BE PUT
INTO EFFECT, BECAUSE THERE'S A BIG QUESTION MARK IN REGARD TO
WHETHER THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAN GET INVOLVED IN THE
REGULATIONS THAT STATES HAVE INSURANCE COMPANIES.
AS YOU GUYS
KNOW, REGULATIONS VARY STATE-BY-STATE.
SOME OF THE RED
STATES HAVE WAY LESS REGULATIONS FOR PRIVATE INSURANCE, SOME OF
THE BLUE STATES HAVE STRICTER REGULATIONS.
SO WHEN YOU CREATE
A SYSTEM WHERE PEOPLE CAN BUY INSURANCE ACROSS STATE LINES,
WHAT DO YOU THINK INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE GOING TO DO?
THEY
ARE GOING TO STATES WHERE THERE ARE THE LEAST REGULATIONS AND
IT'S GOING TO BE A RACE TO THE BOTTOM.
LESS REGULATIONS MEAN
THAT US THE CONSUMER GET SCREWED OVER.
THAT'S ONE REASON YOU
AREN'T ALLOWED TO BUY ACROSS STATE LINES, IT GIVES STATES
MORE SAY IN HOW THE COMPANIES ARE RUN.
IF IT MERELY GIVES PEOPLE MORE CHOICE ON THE SURFACE IT SEEMS
--
ON THE SURFACE IT SEEMS GREAT.
BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE DOING IT I'M SURE IT ISN'T.
THAT'S A JOKE BUT IT ISN'T.
IT'S SO AT ODDS WITH THE LEGISLATION THEY JUST TRIED TO
PASS.
HE SAYS WE WILL PASS SOMETHING NEXT YEAR -- THE RULES
CHANGE NEXT YEAR.
THE REASON THEY ARE HURRYING IT FOR
SATURDAY IS THAT BECAUSE THEY WILL NEED 60 SENATORS AFTER
SATURDAY, HE WON'T HAVE 60 SENATORS, DEMOCRATS AREN'T GOING
TO COME FLOCKING TO GRAHAM CASSIDY AFTER THIS IS DONE.
THIS
IS AT ODDS WITH THAT BILL, IT'S SO HAPHAZARD THE WAY THIS
GOVERNMENT IS BEING RUN.
I MADE LIGHT OF IT, BUT HE SAYS HE WILL
CROSS STATE LINES TO BUY INSURANCE, DO A LOT OF OTHER
THINGS, WHO KNOWS WHAT THOSE ARE?
HE CLEARLY DOESN'T.
HERE'S THE THING ABOUT TRUMP IN THIS HEALTHCARE DEBATE.
HE
HAS BEEN BULLYING GOP SENATORS WHO REFUSED TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF
IT BECAUSE THEY ARE ACTUALLY SHOCKINGLY CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR
CONSTITUENTS AND WHAT THEIR CONSTITUENTS WANT, BUT AT THE
SAME TIME TRUMP IS NOT INVOLVED IN ANY OF THESE DISCUSSIONS AT
ALL. AND WHAT I MEAN BY THAT IS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THESE
PROPOSALS INCLUDE, HE DOESN'T KNOW HOW IT WORKS, ALL HE WANTS
IS A LEGISLATIVE WIN.
HE HASN'T PORED OVER STUDIES, HOW IT MIGHT
IMPACT CONSUMERS OR HOW IT MIGHT NEGATIVELY IMPACT AMERICANS WHO
NEED INSURANCE, DOESN'T CARE ABOUT ANY OF THAT, DOESN'T KNOW,
ISN'T INTERESTED.
HE'S TOO BUSY TWEETING AT FIVE IN THE MORNING
AFTER WATCHING WHATEVER CABLE NEWS SHOW HE'S WATCHING.
AND
THAT'S THE THING, HE IS PLAYING WITH PEOPLE'S LIVES AND
SIMULTANEOUSLY BULLYING LAWMAKERS WHO HAVE AT LEAST
SOME KNOWLEDGE OF WHAT THEY ARE VOTING ON.
THERE ARE 48 DEMOCRATIC SENATORS AND HANDFUL OF HER
PUBLIC AND SENATORS WHO WOULD I PRESUME BE INTERESTED IN FIXING
OBAMACARE AND BOLSTERING IT IN PLACES IT NEEDS TO BE BOLSTERED.
LAMAR ALEXANDER AND PATTY MURRAY WERE WORKING ON IT UNTIL
THEY SAID THEY ARE BRINGING IN GRAHAM CASSIDY, WE DON'T
NEED TO WORK ON IT.
THERE'S A GREAT LINE THAT'S WORTH READING.
TRUMP SAID,
TALKING ABOUT GRAHAM CASSIDY, THE 52 MEMBER CAUCUS HAS UNTIL
SATURDAY BUT SENATOR MCCONNELL PULLED THE VOTE AS IT LACKS
SUPPORT.
TRUMP CLAIMED REPUBLICANS DO HAVE THE
NECESSARY VOTES, THOUGH HE LATER SAID WE ARE ONLY ONE OFF, MAYBE
TWO.
THEN HE REPEATEDLY INSISTED THAT A REPUBLICAN SENATOR,
LIKELY REFERRING TO SENATOR THAD COCHRAN, WHO IS RECOVERING FROM
SURGERY, IS UNLIKELY YES BUT HE'S RECOVERING IN THE HOSPITAL.
A SENATOR FOR COCHRAN SAID THE SENATOR IS NOT IN THE HOSPITAL.
ITS MADNESS AND LUNACY AND GIBBERISH, AND BY THE WAY ALL
THIS EFFORT TO REPEAL THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT HAS
UNDERMINED THE WAY THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT WORKS.
THAT WAS A BIG FEAR OF ALL THE SENATORS.
KNOW THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT IS IN WORSE SHAPE THAN IT HAS
EVER BEEN AND THEY WON'T TRY TO FIX IT, WE HAVE TRUMP NOW SAYING
HE WILL SIGN AN EXECUTIVE ORDER WHERE IT REMAINS UNCLEAR WHETHER
HE WILL BE ABLE LEGALLY TO HAVE ANY EFFECT AT ALL, AND THE ODDS
THAT AN EXECUTIVE ORDER FIXES WHAT IS WRONG WITH OBAMACARE AND
HELPS PEOPLE GET MORE AFFORDABLE INSURANCE STRIKES ME AS
INCONCEIVABLE.
AND TO BE CLEAR, THEY HAVE NO INTENTION OF HELPING TO IMPROVE
OBAMACARE, BECAUSE THEY DON'T THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA
POLITICALLY.
THIS IS ALL ABOUT POLITICS, BECAUSE TRUMP FIRST OF
ALL WANTS TO UNDO ANYTHING OBAMA HAS DONE, EVEN IF IT'S A GOOD
POLICY, AND WE ALL LIKE KNOWLEDGE THAT THE AFFORDABLE
CARE ACT NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED, THERE ARE DEFINITELY FLAWS, BUT
IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A FOUNDATION WHICH WE IMPROVE ON.
REPUBLICANS HAVE A CHANCE TO DO THAT, TO PUT POLITICS ASIDE AND
SAY LET'S DO SOMETHING TO HELP THESE INCREASING PREMIUMS,
MAYBE SOME COST CONTROLS.
BUT THEY AREN'T REALLY INTERESTED IN DOING THAT,
THEY WANT TO SEE IT FAIL.
AND WE KNOW FROM REPORTING THAT WHAT SOME REPUBLICANS ARE
HOPING HAPPENS IS THAT THEY JUST WAIT AND TRUMP SAID TODAY FROM A
REPUBLICAN STANDPOINT WE HAVE THE VOTES, WE WILL VOTE IN
JANUARY, FEBRUARY, OR MARCH.
TO DO THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO PASS
ANOTHER CONTINUING RESOLUTION, AND DECIDE THEY WANT TO DO IT ON
HEALTHCARE AND NOT THE BUDGET, BECAUSE YOU CAN ONLY DO ONE,
UNLESS THEY COMBINED THEM.
WHICH IS SUPER TRICKY, TO COMBINE
THEM.
ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE.
SO THE LIKELIHOOD THAT THEY WILL BE
ABLE TO DO IT IN JANUARY, FEBRUARY, OR MARCH WITH 50 VOTES
IS UNLIKELY.
BUT THEY HOPE THAT THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT WILL BE
SIGNIFICANTLY WEAKENED, WE KNOW THEY WANT AND WE HAVE SEEN
WIDELY REPORTED, THEY WANT PEOPLE'S HEALTH CARE PLAN TO
FAIL SO THEY CAN REPEAL THE THING THAT HAS BARACK OBAMA'S
NAME ON IT.
THAT'S MADNESS, THAT'S INSANITY.
BY THEN WE ARE ALSO GOING TO BE DEALING WITH ROBERT
MUELLER AND WHAT HE HAS TO SAY.
AND THE LIKELIHOOD THAT SOME OF THESE REPUBLICANS, THE CLOSER
WE GET TO THE MIDTERMS IN 2018, THEY WANT TO GET INVOLVED AND BE
IN CHARGE OF REPEALING IT?
AND I THINK WHAT PAUL RYAN HAD SAID
APPARENTLY AT ONE POINT TO MITCH MCCONNELL WAS WHATEVER YOU PASS,
WE WILL PASS.
SO THAT THEY COULD GET IT DONE AT THE DEADLINE.
THEN YOU WILL BE LOOKING AT SOME VULNERABLE NUMBERS OF THE HOUSE
AND I SUSPECT AS WE GET INTO MARCH, APRIL, AND MAY, THEY WILL
SAY I DON'T WANT TO REPEAL PEOPLE'S HEALTHCARE FOR
MONTHS BEFORE THE ELECTION.
BUT THEIR PLAN CONTINUES TO BE TO WEAKEN OBAMACARE.
AND HIS PLAN IS TO CONTINUE BULLYING SENATORS AND
CONGRESSMEN.
TODAY HE WAS IN INDIANA SELLING TAX REFORMS, HE
FLEW WITH SENATOR JOE DONNELLY ON AIR FORCE ONE TO INDIANA, DID
HIS RALLY, IN THE MIDDLE OF THE RALLY LOOKED AT JOE DONNELLY AND
SAID IF YOU DON'T VOTE FOR THIS WE WILL WORK SO HARD TO MAKE
SURE YOU ARE NOT ELECTED, AFTER HE FLEW HIM OUT THERE.
ON THE
ONE HAND HE'S A REPUBLIC AND PRESIDENT COME HE'S NOT GOING TO
WORK HARD TO GET JOE DONNELLY ELECTED, A DEMOCRAT IN INDIANA.
BUT IT'S THIS THREATENING AND BULLYING, IT'S UNBELIEVABLE.
THAT'S WHAT HE LOVES TO DO.
IF YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT, DON'T GET ON THE PLANE.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Touts "Giant, Beautiful, Massive, The Biggest Ever In Our Country, Tax Cut" - Duration: 16:32.
>>DONALD TRUMP HAS BEGUN HIS NATIONAL TOUR TOUTING HIS
PROPOSAL TO CUT TAXES, AND YOU WILL HERE FROM HIS CABINET
MEMBERS WHERE THEY SAY THEY AREN'T GOING TO CUT TAXES FOR
THE WEALTHY, THEY WILL ONLY FOCUS ON THE MIDDLE CLASS.
TRUMP
MADE AN INTERESTING CHOICE WHEN HE SPOKE TO MANUFACTURERS
AND SAID THE FOLLOWING.
>>MY ADMINISTRATION IS WORKING EVERY DAY TO LIFT THE BURDENS ON
OUR COMPANIES AND ON OUR WORKERS SO THAT YOU CAN THRIVE, COMPETE
COME AND GROW.
AND AT THE VERY CENTER OF THAT PLAN IS A GIANT,
BEAUTIFUL, MASSIVE -- THE BIGGEST EVER IN OUR COUNTRY --
TAX-CUT.
>>GIANT, MASSIVE, BEAUTIFUL.
>>HE SOUNDED LIKE HE WAS DOING MORE THAN LOCKER ROOM TALK.
LIKE
HE WAS WITH HIS FRIENDS -- YOU SHOULD SEE IT, IT'S GIANT,
BEAUTIFUL.
BUT THAT IS HOW HE SEES TAX CUTS.
GOTTA HIT THAT.
BUT MY FAVORITE PART IS, ALL THIS TIME A LOT OF THE
ESTABLISHMENT HAVE NOT BEEN TELLING IT TAX CUTS, THEY ARE
MORE SAVVY THAN THAT, THEY CALL IT TAX REFORM.
WINK.
NO, IT'S
NOT GOING TO AFFECT THE DEFICIT, THIS ISN'T TAX CUTS FOR THE
RICH, WE ARE JUST REFORMING TAXES.
AND NOBODY GIVE TRUMP THE
MEMO.
AND EVEN IF THEY DID HE WOULDN'T READ IT.
>>I FORGET WHERE HE MADE THIS STATEMENT, IT WAS FROM LAST
WEEK, BUT HE WAS SPEAKING TO REPUBLICANS AND HE SAID, AND I'M
PARAPHRASING, BUT HE SAID THIS, STOP CALLING IT TAX REFORM, IT'S
TAX CUTS.
CALL IT WHAT IT IS.
FIRST OF ALL I THINK THAT TYPE
OF TRANSPARENCY IS ACTUALLY SOMETHING HIS BASE LOVES -- I
KNOW HE'S NOT BEING TRANSPARENT FOR THE SAKE OF IT, IT'S AN
ACCIDENT, BUT I APPRECIATE IT TOO BECAUSE WE NEED TO HEAR WHAT
IT REALLY IS INSTEAD OF SOME TACTFUL, SHADY, SLIMY POLITICIAN
PRETENDING LIKE WE ARE GOING TO REFORM THE SYSTEM AND SIMPLIFY
IT SO YOU AREN'T AS CONFUSED AND YOU SAVE A LITTLE MONEY.
HE
WANTS TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY.
MEMBERS OF HIS CABINET, THOUGH,
ARE GOING AROUND AND SAYING -- HIS ECONOMIC ADVISOR, FOR
INSTANCE, IS SAYING IT'S NOT TAX CUTS FOR THE WEALTHY.
BUT THINK
ABOUT WHO HE IS SPEAKING TO, HE'S SPEAKING TO THE NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE
EITHER AUTOMATING THEIR JOBS OR SHIPPING THEM OVERSEAS, AND
TRUMP IS ARGUING IF WE CUT THEIR TAXES WE CAN BRING THOSE JOBS
BACK TO THE U.S. BUT CASE STUDIES SHOW THAT'S NOT THE
CASE, THEY WILL TAKE THEIR SAVINGS FROM THEIR TAX CUTS AND
DO ACQUISITIONS OR BUY SHARES OF THEIR OWN COMPANY.
AND I HAVE
SOME PROOF OF THAT, LET'S GO TO IT.
FIRST, LET'S GET TO THE
DETAILS OF THE PLAN WHEN IT COMES TO CORPORATIONS --
>>THAT IS A BIG, BEAUTIFUL TAX-CUT FOR MULTINATIONAL
CORPORATIONS THAT DONATE TO POLITICIANS.
BUT THE
PASS-THROUGH PART IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT AFFECTS DONALD TRUMP
PERSONALLY.
SO INSTEAD OF PAYING 39% -- CALL IT 40% -- HE BRINGS
IT DOWN.
NORMALLY IF YOU ARE RUNNING A BUSINESS AND YOU PAY
PERSONAL TAXES -- AND HE WOULD THEORETICALLY BE AT THE HIGHEST
RATE, 40% -- IF YOU DO A PASS-THROUGH BUSINESS NOW THEY
SAY SINCE IT'S A BUSINESS I'M GOING TO KNOCK THAT DOWN TO 25%.
SO HE JUST SAVED 15% ON HIS TAXES.
SO ON THAT HE WON'T BE
TRANSPARENT, AND EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE HE WILL LIE AND SAY THIS
DOESN'T AFFECT ME AT ALL.
ALL OF HIS BUSINESSES ARE PASS-THROUGH
BUSINESSES.
IF HE'S TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY
HE HAS, HE'S SAVING BILLIONS.
HE JUST CUT HIS OWN TAXES BY
BILLIONS.
EVEN IF HE'S LYING HE'S SAVING MILLIONS.
SO IT'S INCREDIBLY SELF-AGGRANDIZING, THIS PLAN.
>>THAT'S WHY THOSE CONFLICT OF INTEREST DEBATES THAT HAPPENED
AFTER HIS INAUGURATION WERE IMPORTANT.
HE'S USING HIS
POSITION IN OFFICE TO BENEFIT HIMSELF AND HIS OWN BUSINESSES.
I DON'T KNOW, I GUESS HIS SUPPORTERS DON'T CARE TOO MUCH.
>>I'M ONLY HALF JOKING, BUT DO YOU THINK HE KNOWS WHAT THE
MIDDLE CLASS IS?
LIKE, MAYBE HE THINKS TOM PRICE IS THE MIDDLE
CLASS.
WHEN I FIRST SAW HOW HIS TAX PLAN WORKED, LIKE, IF YOU
MAKE THAT MUCH MONEY, WHY DON'T YOU MAKE MORE?
AND SOMEBODY WITH
$14 MILLION, THE LOW END OF HIS CABINET -- AS HE SAID MANY OF MY
CABINET MEMBERS ON THEIR OWN JETS -- I'M PRETTY SURE BY THE
WAY MOST OF THE COST IS FUEL AND PERSONNEL.
MAYBE HE LITERALLY
THINKS LIKE THE MIDDLE CLASS -- HE HAS DISDAIN FOR PEOPLE WITH
10 OR $12 MILLION.
LIKE, WHO HAS 10 OR $12 MILLION?
BY NEXT YEAR
YOU SHOULD HAVE 25 MILLION.
I'M HALF JOKING BUT I WOULDN'T BE
SURPRISED.
IF YOU COULD ASK DONALD TRUMP, WHERE IS THE
MIDDLE CLASS, WHAT DO THEY MAKE?
>>SOMEONE SHOULD DEFINITELY ASK THEM.
THERE IS NO WAY HE WOULD
BE RIGHT BY AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE.
HE PROBABLY THINKS THE MIDDLE CLASS IS LIKE A MILLION BUCKS.
>>750,000, SOMETHING LIKE THAT, PER YEAR?
>>PLEASE SOMEBODY ASK HIM.
KEEP GOING ON THE DETAILS.
>>NOW LET'S GET TO WHAT THE BIG CORPORATIONS PLAN TO DO WITH
THESE TAX CUTS, THIS IS BASED ON THEIR RESPONSES TO SURVEY
QUESTIONS --
>>THEY AREN'T SAYING THEY WILL, THEY SAID THAT SURE, IT MAKES
YOU MORE LIKELY.
ONLY 57%.
THINK ABOUT HOW MUCH WE ARE
SACRIFICING IN REVENUE, IN TAXPAYER MONEY THAT HELPS FUND
THESE PROGRAMS WE NEED, THINK ABOUT HOW MUCH WE ARE
SACRIFICING ON THE SMALL CHANCE THAT SOME OF THESE CORPORATIONS
WILL CONSIDER CREATING MORE JOBS.
>>REAL QUICK, WE THINK ABOUT THIS ON SUCH A SMALL SCALE.
THERE'S A GUY IN ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA WHO OWNS A LUMBER
YARD, AND HE DOES WELL.
MAKES 1.5 MILLION PER YEAR.
THAT'S THE
ONLY THING REPUBLICANS WANT TO TALK ABOUT.
THEY WILL SAY THAT
GUY GET THE TAX CUT AND MAYBE INSTEAD OF EMPLOYING 86 WORKERS
HE CAN EMPLOY 104, DO MORE BUSINESS, THAT'S HOW IT IS
SUPPOSED TO WORK.
BUT WE AREN'T TALKING ABOUT THOSE GUYS.
THAT'S
GREAT IF THAT HAPPENS, BUT THAT GUY ISN'T GOING TO GET BOUGHT BY
ANOTHER COMPANY NOR WILL HE BUY ANOTHER COMPANY.
THIS IS PEOPLE
WHO EMPLOY 86,000 PEOPLE AND THEN MERGE WITH A COMPANY THAT
HAS 71,000 AND THEN TOGETHER THEY HAVE 100,000 SO THEY FIRE
57,000.
>>THAT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.
>>THESE GIANT MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS, WHAT THEY DO IS
THEY SAY IT RIGHT BEFORE THE TAX CUTS, WE ARE GOING TO EXPAND
WORKERS, I'M SURPRISED ONLY 57% -- IF THEY WERE SAVVY 97% WITH A
MORE WORKERS, SURE.
BUT IN REALITY WHEN YOU DOUBLE CHECK
WHAT THEY HAVE DONE IS WHAT ANA WAS REFERRING TO EARLIER, THEY
ACQUIRE ANOTHER COMPANY AND THEY GO GREAT, SYNERGY, THAT MEANS I
FIRE HALF OF YOUR ACCOUNTING STAFF AND HALF OF MINE, NOW WE
JUST HAVE ONE ACCOUNTING STAFF THAT IS HALF THE SIZE, LITTLE
MANUFACTURING, ETC., AND THE OTHER THING THEY DO IS STOCK
BUYBACKS.
>>YES.
THAT IS UNACCOUNTABLE.
THEY BUY SHARES OF THEIR OWN
COMPANY TO INCREASE THE STOCK VALUE OF THEIR OWN COMPANY FOR
THEIR FREAKING INVESTORS.
>>LET ME EXPLAIN.
>>NO!
>>[LAUGHTER]
>>IT MAKES ME SO MAD.
>>IF YOU ARE WONDERING, YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO RAISE THE STOCK
PRICE FOR YOUR SHAREHOLDERS -- KIND OF.
PART OF THE REASON THEY
ARE INCREASING THE STOCK PRICE IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE BONUSES AND
OPTIONS SO THEY WILL EXERCISE THEIR OPTIONS AT THE HIGHER
STOCK PRICE AND MAKE MORE MONEY PERSONALLY.
AND EVEN IF YOU SAY
THAT'S GREAT, I WANT THEM TO MAKE EVEN MORE MONEY IS THE CEO
-- OKAY, GOD BLESS -- BUT IT'S NOT DOING WHAT THEY SAID THEY
WOULD, WHICH IS TO HIRE MORE AMERICAN WORKERS.
UNDERSTAND
WHAT IS GOING ON.
IN THE REAL WAY TO INCREASE SHAREHOLDER
VALUE IS TO HAVE A BETTER COMPANY.
AND MORE INVESTMENT
MIGHT LEAD TO A COMPANY WORTH MORE IN THE LONG RUN, THE
BUYBACKS ARE MORE OF A SHORT-TERM EXERCISE TIED TO
THEIR OWN VALUE.
WHAT'S EVERYTHING IN THE LAST 40 YEARS
IS SHORT-TERM.
WE THINK ABOUT THIS WRONG.
YES, YOU HAVE A
FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCKHOLDERS.
YOU DON'T HAVE A
RESPONSIBILITY TO STOCKHOLDERS TO INCREASE THEIR MARGIN OF
RETURN AT THE EXPENSE OF X NUMBER OF WORKERS WHO YOU FIRE.
AND WE DIDN'T ALWAYS THINK THAT WAY.
I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE
RULES IN PLACE TO PREVENT IT OR WE JUST THOUGHT I'M INVESTED IN
THIS COMPANY AND I GET A PRETTY HEALTHY 2% RATE OF RETURN,
SOMETIMES I LOSE, SOME YEARS I GET FOUR -- BUT NOW ALL WE DO IS
CHASE MONEY.
I HAVE A COUPLE OF SUPER RICH FRIENDS -- A COUPLE
OF THEM ARE FRIENDS -- AND THEY ARE REASONABLE GUYS, THEY VOTE
REPUBLICAN BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS HAVE, I THINK, AND THEY WANT
THEIR TAXES CUT, AND THEY WORRY ABOUT SOCIALISM, THEY ARE KIND,
DECENT, CHARITABLE GUYS, BUT THEY DO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THERE
HAS BEEN A MIND SHIFT CHANGE, THAT OVER THE LAST 30 YEARS THE
DESIRE TO GET THAT RATE OF RETURN, TO DELIVER THE WAY
BERNIE MADOFF, DELIVERED, THAT'S ALL THEY THINK ABOUT.
THAT
BECOMES PARAMOUNT.
AS OPPOSED TO I'M GOING TO HAVE A COMPANY THAT
GROWS AT A REASONABLE PERCENTAGE AND KEEP THIS TOWN AFLOAT
AND THEN I WILL DIE AND THAT WILL BE FINE.
>>I'M THE MOST CONSERVATIVE ON THIS PANEL ON THIS ISSUE WHEN I
THINK THAT WANTING TO INCREASE YOUR RATE OF RETURN IS A FAIRLY
NORMAL THING TO DO, I THINK THERE IS A POINT AT WHICH GREED
KICKS IN AND YOU BECOME COUNTERPRODUCTIVE, I HAD THIS
CONVERSATION JUST YESTERDAY WITH ONE OF THE RICHEST MEN ALIVE,
CHECK THAT OUT ON YOUTUBE -- BUT
I DON'T MIND THEM TRYING TO
INCREASE THEIR RATE OF RETURN, MAYBE TO ONE WHERE OTHERS MIGHT
BE UNCOMFORTABLE.
BUT WHAT I DO MIND IS YOU TELLING US YOU NEED
$1 TRILLION IN TAX CUTS, WHICH THEN WON'T LET OUR KIDS GET AN
EDUCATION, HIGHWAYS, ETC., AND THEN YOU SAY IT'S BECAUSE YOU
WILL HIRE WORKERS AND IT'S JUST NOT TRUE, YOU AREN'T, YOU ARE
GOING TO TRY TO INCREASE YOUR RATE OF RETURN WHICH I THINK YOU
HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DO, BUT NOT AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE AND NOT
THROUGH LYING TO THE PUBLIC.
>>AND I WILL PASS A LAW THAT SAYS YOU CAN'T REALLY GO FOR IT
UNDER THE MANKIEWICZ ADMINISTRATION, I JUST THINK WE
SHOULD RECOGNIZE TO WHAT EXTENT GREED HAS MOTIVATED US.
WE
SHOULD THINK ABOUT IT.
TO YOUR LAST POINT, CENK, ABOUT NOT
HIRING WORKERS, AND ANA'S INITIAL POINT, 57% SAY THEY WILL
HIRE WORKERS.
THAT MEETS 43%, THEY MAY NOT HAVE ALL SAID THEY
WEREN'T, BUT THOSE GUYS DEFINITELY AREN'T GOING TO HIRE
WORKERS.
OF THE 57%, AS YOU SAY IF THEY WERE SAVVY THEY WOULD
JUST SAY YES, SOME OF THEM WILL REALIZE AFTERWARDS, WE HAVE TO
HIRE MORE WORKERS BECAUSE I SAID IN THE SURVEY.
SO THE TAX CUTS
WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO HIRE WORKERS, IT'S UNQUESTIONABLE
THAT MORE THAN HALF, AND I WOULD SAY TWO THIRDS -- IF HALF OF THE
57% AREN'T GOING TO DO IT AND ALL OF THE 43%, 71% AREN'T GOING
TO HIRE WORKERS, IT DOESN'T WORK, AND WE KNOW IT WON'T
BECAUSE IT NEVER HAS.
IT MIGHT HAVE WORKED WHEN THE CORPORATE TAX RATE WAS
ASTRONOMICALLY HIGH.
>>ACTUALLY THAT'S WHEN WE CREATED THE MOST JOBS.
>>THAT IS WHEN WE WERE CRANKING JOBS OUT.
>>LAST THINGS ON THIS, WARREN BUFFETT IS RIGHT.
I RUN A SMALL
BUSINESS COMPARED TO THOSE GUYS, BUT OVERALL I AGREE WITH HIM,
AND HE SAYS NOBODY SAYS I'M GOING TO START A BUSINESS OR
MAKE AN INVESTMENT BUT I WON'T DO IT IF THE TAXES ARE TOO HIGH.
YOU EITHER ARE AN ENTREPRENEUR OR BUSINESSMAN OR FINANCE PERSON
AND ARE GOING TO MAKE MONEY, AND YOU WORRY ABOUT TAXES LATER --
OF COURSE TAXES HAVE OTHER IMPLICATIONS BUT EITHER YOU ARE
GOING TO DO THAT BUSINESS OR NOT, AND YOU ARE A TERRIBLE
BUSINESSPERSON IF YOU ARE SAYING MY MARGINAL TAXES ARE A LITTLE
HIGHER SO I WON'T GO INTO IT AT ALL.
>>REPUBLICANS TELL THOSE STORIES, I'VE HEARD THEM, THAT
PEOPLE AREN'T GOING TO EXPAND THEIR BUSINESSES BECAUSE EITHER
IT'S TOO MUCH PAPERWORK --
>>I HAVE HEARD THAT TOO, HOW PATHETIC IS THAT?
>>IF YOU WANT TO STREAMLINE PAPERWORK I GOT IT, BUT WHAT
THEY REALLY MEAN IS I DON'T WANT TO COMPLY WITH REGULATIONS.
IF
YOU HAVE MONEY AND YOU HAVE A GOOD IDEA FOR THE BUSINESS I
HAVE TO BE HONEST, THE EXTRA SIX DAYS OF PAPERWORK YOU MIGHT HAVE
TO DO OR SOME EMPLOYEE HAS TO DO SHOULD NOT PREVENT YOU FROM
DOING IT. AND I NEVER MEET OR READ ABOUT THE ACTUAL PERSON --
I WAS GOING TO EXPAND MY BUSINESS BUT THE TAXES WERE TOO
HIGH AND THERE WAS TOO MUCH PAPERWORK SO I DIDN'T.
>>THEN YOU ARE LAZY, TERRIBLE BUSINESSMAN.
FOR EXAMPLE IF YOU
ARE A PUBLIC CORPORATION YOU HAVE TO HIRE MORE PEOPLE TO MAKE
SURE YOU COMPLY WITH THE LAW, BUT THAT'S BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT
PEOPLE GETTING RIPPED OFF.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW WHAT THEY
REALLY THINK, DON'T TALK TO THEM BEFORE THE TAX CUTS WHEN THEY
ARE LOOKING FOR THE MONEY.
ACTUALLY GO TO WHAT THEY SAY TO
SHAREHOLDERS, BECAUSE EVERY QUARTER THEY HAVE TO ANNOUNCE
WHAT THEY ARE DOING, ETC., AND THERE THEY TURN AROUND AND BRAG
ABOUT HOW MANY JOBS THEY HAVE CUT, BECAUSE THEN THE
SHAREHOLDERS GO THAT'S GOOD, WE SAVED A LOT OF MONEY.
AND BY THE
WAY, AT THAT POINT LEGALLY THEY MUST TELL THE TRUTH OTHERWISE
THEY WOULD BE IN LEGAL TROUBLE BECAUSE THAT AFFECTS THEIR STOCK
PRICE.
SO ALL THIS IS NONSENSE TALK SO THEY CAN GRAB THE MONEY.
AFTERWARDS LOOK AT WHAT THEY SAY IN THOSE QUARTERLY REPORTS, YOU
WILL HAVE YOUR REAL ANSWER, AND WE'VE LOOKED IN THE PAST, AND
WHAT THEY DO IS CUT JOBS.
I'M SORRY, ONE MORE ECONOMIC POINT
HERE.
WHEN TAXES ARE HIGH WHY MIGHT THEY HIRE MORE PEOPLE
RATHER THAN LESS?
BECAUSE IF YOU'RE GOING TO PAY A LOT OF
TAXES YOU DON'T WANT TO TAKE THE MONEY IN INCOME AND PAY THOSE
TAXES, YOU'D RATHER KEEP THEM INSIDE THE COMPANY, AND IF
YOU KEEP THEM INSIDE THE COMPANY YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO HIRE
MORE PEOPLE AND GROW YOUR COMPANY.
>>IT'S A DEDUCTION, RIGHT?
YOU GET A DEDUCTION FOR EMPLOYEES BECAUSE IT IS A
BUSINESS COST.
I COULD BE WRONG.
>>THAT'S COMPLICATED, THE OVERALL POINT IS YOU DON'T WANT
TO TAKE THE MONEY OUT AND PAY TAXES ON IT IF THE TAXES ARE SO
HIGH, IT'S BETTER TO GROW YOUR COMPANY AND HAVE YOUR COMPANY BE
WORTH MORE IN THE LONG RUN.
IF YOU KEEP THE MONEY INSIDE THE
COMPANY AND HIRE MORE PEOPLE AND GROW IT INSTEAD OF TAKING IT OUT
AND GETTING A YACHT IN THE MANSION --
>>I WOULD ADD SOMETHING BUT LITERALLY EVERYTHING I KNOW
ABOUT ECONOMICS WAS USED UP IN THE LAST SIX MINUTES.
-------------------------------------------
Cops Reprimanded For Supporting NFL Protests - Duration: 7:03.
2 POLICE OFFICERS IN CHICAGO HAVE BEEN OFFICIALLY REPRIMANDED
AFTER A PHOTO FEATURING THEM WHEN VIRAL ONLINE.
IN THE PHOTO, THEY ARE SHOWN KNEELING IN SOLIDARITY WITH NFL
PLAYERS WHO ALSO KNEEL DURING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM AND THIS
WHOLE STORY CAME ABOUT WHEN AN ACTIVIST APPROACHED THEM AND
ASKED IF THEY SUPPORTED PEOPLE LIKE COLIN KAEPERNICK.
THEY WERE ASKED IF THEY AGREED WITH THE PROTEST AGAINST POLICE
BRUTALITY AND THEY WERE AFFIRMATIVE.
THEY POST THIS PHOTO THAT WAS POSTED ON INSTAGRAM AND
WHEN VIRAL.
FOR THE MOST PART IT GOT A LOT OF SUPPORT BUT AFTER ENOUGH
PEOPLE SOLID, PARTS ARE GOING TO BE SOME WHO ARE OPPOSED TO
IT AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WAS NOTIFIED OF THE IMAGE AND
THEY RELEASED A STATEMENT INDICATING THAT THESE
POLICE OFFICERS WOULD BE REPRIMANDED.
I ALSO WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT THE DEPARTMENT DOES HAVE A
PRETTY STRICT POLICY WHEN IT COMES TO PARTISAN POLITICAL
SPEECH WHILE ON DUTY.
THERE OBVIOUSLY IN UNIFORM AND THEY MADE A POLITICAL
STATEMENT AND SO THAT IS THE REASON THAT THE DEPARTMENT
IS GIVING FOR REPRIMANDING THEM.
THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT IS AS FOLLOWS:
OKAY.
I'M SPLIT ON THIS.
GET IT, THEM A POLICY.
AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT'S A REPRIMAND AND A REMINDER OF
DEPARTMENT POLICIES.
DELL LIVE.
THEY WILL BE OKAY.
SOME PEOPLE ARE MISTAKING THAT THESE OFFICERS GETTING FIRED.
THEY'RE NOT GETTING FIRED.
ON THE OTHER HAND.
THEY ARE NOT REALLY DOING POLITICAL PARAPHERNALIA.
IT IS NOT LIKE THEY ARE SAYING VOTE FOR BOB OR SUSIE OR
REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT.
IT EASILY COULD HAVE BEEN INTERPRETED AS NOT A POLITICAL
STATEMENT AND THEN THINK ABOUT WHAT THE STATEMENT IS.
IT'S AGAINST POLICE BRUTALITY.
THEY ARE POLICE.
I HOPE THAT ALL THE COPS AGREE THAT THEY ARE AGAINST
POLICE PER TALLY.
IF THAT IS AGAINST HER GUIDELINES, TO BE IN AGAINST
REALITY, THEN I AM A LITTLE WORRIED ABOUT YOUR GUIDELINES.
IT IS SUPER EASY TO SAY, THAT IS NOT A POLITICAL STATEMENT,
OF COURSE WE ARE ALL AGAINST POLICE REALITY.
YES.
I HATE ZERO-TOLERANCE POLICIES.
I THINK THAT ONCE YOU PUT OUT A ZERO-TOLERANCE POLICY IN
REGARD TO POLITICAL SPEECH AND YOU KNOW, YOU WERE TALKING
ABOUT PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUTTING FORTH A POLICY THAT
SQUASHES POLITICAL SPEECH.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN HAVE A DEBATE ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT
THIS IS PROTECTED BY THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
I GET THE IDEA THOUGH THAT HEY, WE NEED HAVE A POLICY IN PLACE
BECAUSE WE MIGHT HAVE SOME POLICE OFFICERS WHO SAY THINGS
THAT LEAD TO THE COMMUNITY FURTHER DISTRUSTING THEM AND SO
WE'VE HAD A NUMBER OF STORIES WHEN POLICE HAVE SAID THINGS
THAT ARE HORRIBLE TOWARD THE BLACK COMMUNITY ARE THOSE WHO
HAVE BEEN PROTESTING AND THAT UNFORTUNATELY, NOT UNFORTUNATELY.
UNDERSTANDABLY LEADS TO THE COMMUNITY NOT TRUSTING THEM.
HOWEVER, IN THIS CASE, I FEEL LIKE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT
SHOULD BE PROTECTED.
IT SEEMS LIKE THE ONLY TIME COPS GET REPRIMANDED OR FACE A
PUNISHMENT IS WHEN THEY CRITICIZE OTHER COPS OR
CALL OUT OTHER COPS.
I THINK NOW MORE THAN EVER, WE NEED THE GOOD COPS TO COME
FORWARD AND BE LIKE YOU KNOW WHAT?
WE'RE NOT GOING TO STAND FOR THIS.
ALL OF THESE MURDERS AGAINST PEOPLE WHO ARE UNARMED, WE'RE
NOT GOING TO STAND FOR THIS.
WE HAVE TO CHANGE THE POLICING AND THE TRAINING.
THAT IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN ASKING FOR.
THIS IS WHY WE HAD A MILE STATEMENT WHO KNEELED IN A
PHOTO AND THEY GET REPRIMANDED.
I TOTALLY GREW THE POLICY OVER ALL.
I DON'T WANT TO COP SHOWING UP IN A MAGA HAT.
I ALSO DON'T WANT A COP SHOWING UP WITH AND I'M WITH HER STICKER
EVEN A BERNIE SO PUNK T-SHIRT WHICH YOU CAN GET AT SHOPTYT.COM
BECAUSE WHAT IF SOME PEOPLE ARE MADE UNCOMFORTABLE?
THEY WEREN'T WITH HER OR IT'S A VERY WEALTHY PERSON'S HOUSE
AND THEY WRONGLY ARE MADE UNCOMFORTABLE BY BERNIE
SANDERS AND THEY'RE NOT SHOW THE COP IS ON THE SIDE.
WE CANNOT HAVE IT.
I TOTALLY AGREE THAT YOU SHOULD LEAVE POLITICS OUT OF IT.
BUT KAEPERNICK TAKING ANY AND RAISING A FIST AND THE PLAYERS
AND EVEN SOME OF THE OWNERS DOING IT ARE NOT SAYING WE ARE
AGAINST COPS, THEY ARE NOT SAYING WHERE AGAINST ANY RACE
CERTAINLY, THEY'RE SAYING WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY
IS TREATED EQUALLY AND THAT WE DON'T HAVE POLICE PER TALLY.
ESPECIALLY IF YOU'RE THE POLICE.
YOU HAVE TO AGREE WITH THAT MESSAGE.
AND LAST THING IS THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE THE WRONG
IMPRESSION OF COPS.
THEY THINK FOR EXAMPLE, WE ARE AGAINST COPS.
THAT IS CRAZY.
WE TALKED ABOUT 1 MILLION TIMES THAT WE WANT BETTER
TRAINING FOR COPS BECAUSE THEY ARE COPS AND WE WANT THEM
TO PROTECT ALL OF THE COMMUNITY AND WE WANT THEM TRAINED
BETTER TO DO THAT SO THEY DON'T SHOOT AS QUICKLY, ETC.
THEN SOME OF THE RIGHT THING, THE COPS DON'T LIKE YOU GUYS.
I'M SURE THAT'S TRUE FOR SOME OF THE COPS, BUT THAT IS
ACTUALLY NOT AT ALL TRUE FOR A LOT OF THE COPS.
I KNOW FOR MY FOR PERSONAL LIFE.
COPS ARE SHOUTING OUT A MEAL THE TIME.
BUT NOT IN THAT WAY.
IT'LL BE LIKE HEY, YOUNG TURKS I WATCH HER SHOW.
KEEP GOING.
IN DC, NEW YORK, AND LA, IN DC WHEN I GOT ARRESTED FOR
CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO GET MONEY OUT OF POLITICS, AS I WAS
GOING TO DO THE PAPERWORK ONE OF THE COPS IS LIKE, YOUNG TURKS.
KEEP IT GOING.
I DON'T WANT THEM GOING TO SOMEBODY ELSE'S HOUSE AND SAYING
THAT BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE POLITICAL.
NOT ALL COPS ARE ALIKE.
THAT IS A RIDICULOUS WAY OF THINKING ON EITHER SIDE.
I LOVE TO SEE THEM DOING THIS SAYING WE ARE AGAINST
POLICE BRUTALITY.
I WISH THE DEPARTMENT WAS A LITTLE MORE UNDERSTANDING OF IT.
ABSOLUTELY.
AND JUST ONE COMMENT IN REGARD TO COPS LIKING US ARE NOT
LIKING US, IT IS NOT OUR JOB TO CARE ABOUT COPS LIKING US.
IT IS OUR JOB TO DO THE BEST WE CAN WITH THESE STORIES AND BE
HONEST WITH YOU GUYS AND GIVE YOU THE FACTS BUT I HAVE A
TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF RESPECT FOR THE COPS THAT WATCH THE SHOW,
SEE SOME OF THE CRITICISMS THAT WE'VE HAD IN REGARD TO POLICE
TRAINING AND THEY HAVE BEEN RECEPTIVE TO IT AND
UNDERSTANDING, SO MUCH LOVE TO THEM.
-------------------------------------------
LEAKED: Lawrence O'Donnell Loses His Sh*t (VIDEO) - Duration: 14:24.
METEORITE HAS PUBLISHED A VIDEO OF AN MSNBC HOST LAWRENCE
O'DONNELL LOSING HIS PATIENCE WITH HIS CREW.
THIS WAS LEAKED, WHOEVER LEAKED IT IS A BAD ACTOR.
IT IS NOT COOL.
HE SHOULD NOT HAVE DONE IT.
BUT THE VIDEO WAS AWESOME.
I DEBATED WHETHER OR NOT WE SHOULD TALK ABOUT THIS,
ULTIMATELY I CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT WE SHOULD.
I LIKE THAT STANDARD.
IF SOMETHING IS TOO FUN, WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO?
I KNOW THAT SOME PEOPLE MIGHT LOOK AT THIS AS DAMAGING HIS
REPUTATION, NO.
I DON'T THINK IT'S THAT BIG OF A DEAL.
HE DID APOLOGIZE FOR IT VIA TWEET.
BUT LET'S GET TO IT.
LET'S GO TO THE FIRST CLIP.
WHAT IS GOING ON?
WHY AM I LOSING THIS?
WHY DON'T I HAVE
SOUND?
ALL RIGHT, IT IS BACK.
SOMEONE IS PRESSING BUTTONS AND TURNING MY SOUND OFF.
WHO WAS ASKING FOR A LABOR DAY RUN DOWN IN MY EAR?
HE IS NOT ON AIR, BUT THE CAMERAS ARE ALWAYS ROLLING.
WHEN I WAS AT MSNBC I WAS COGNIZANT OF THIS.
IT'S NOT THAT YOU FORGET, BUT STUFF IS GOING ON.
WITH ME, I GET HUNGRY BECAUSE I AM RUNNING THE WHOLE DAY SO I
WOULD BE EATING A BANANA OFF AIR AND I WOULD SAY I CAN'T WAIT
FOR THESE TAPES TO BE RELEASED ONE DAY.
SOMEONE HAS THOSE TAPES SOMEWHERE.
THAT IS WHAT I FEEL BAD FOR LAWRENCE HERE.
IF YOU HAVE NEVER HAD AN EAR PIECE IN YOUR EAR, IT IS SUPER
ANNOYING.
OF COURSE YOU GET USE TO IT.
ANA, HAS ONE RIGHT NOW.
YEAH.
WHEN SOMEONE IS TALKING IT IS FRUSTRATING.
IT IS TOO AMUSING AND I FEEL BAD.
IT IS GOOD, BUT IT GETS BETTER.
UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN YOU ARE DOING A LIVE SHOW, AND YOU DO A
LIVE SHOW WITH AN ESTABLISHMENT CABLE NEWS OUTLET.
THERE IS SO MUCH PRESSURE FOR EVERYTHING TO BE PERFECT.
JUST LET LOOSE.
I GET IT, THERE IS SOMETHING GOING ON IN YOUR EAR.
JUST BE HONEST WITH YOUR AUDIENCE AND MOVE ON.
BUT HE IS CONDITIONED TO FREAK OUT AS SOON AS THERE IS A TECH
ISSUE.
LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE NEXT ONE.
DAMMIT.
10 SECONDS.
THAT IS TO ANA'S POINT.
IS NOT JUST TO PICK ON LAWRENCE HE WAS OBVIOUSLY HAVING A BAD
DAY.
BUT BECAUSE TV IS SO FAKE.
IT IS EXACTLY WHAT O'REILLY DID.
IT IS OKAY.
AT THE TOP OF THE SHOW ANNA TOLD SOMEONE TO TURN ON THE MONITOR.
IT IS OKAY.
EVERYONE JUST BRING IT DOWN AND BE HUMAN FOR A SECOND.
EVEN THE ANGER MAKES YOU MORE HUMAN.
I KNOW HE LOSES IT, BUT THIS DID NOT MAKE ME DISLIKE HIM.
IT JUST SHOWED HIS HUMAN SIDE AND YOU NEVER SEE THE HUMAN
SIDE OF PEOPLE.
IT MADE ME APPRECIATE HIM AS A HUMAN.
WE ALL HAVE OUR MELTDOWNS, IT IS NOT THE END.
AND TRAGEDY ñ AND INTO THAT TRAGEDY TODAY STEPS THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
THERE IS INSANITY IN THE CONTROL ROOM TONIGHT.
I'M GOING TO USE THAT LINE FROM NOW ON.
THERE IS INSANITY IN THE CONTROL ROOM TONIGHT.
HIS COMMENTS GET BETTER.
NEXT ONE.
SOMEONE IN THE CONTROL ROOM IS OUT OF CONTROL.
I WANT THAT WENT ON THE SOUNDBOARD AS WELL.
HE HAS NOW LOST IT AND IS UPSET.
HIS EAR PIECE IS STILL NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AND
SOMEONE TRIES TO HELP THEM.
HERE IS HIS REACTION.
WHO HAD BEEN MISSING SINCE SUNDAY MORNING ñ
YOU HAVE INSANITY IN MY EAR PIECE.
DON'T LEAVE IT THERE.
IT IS NOT MY EARPIECE, IT IS SOMEONE TALKING ON OUR LINES.
FUCK.
FUCKING OUT OF CONTROL SHIT.
DO IT ON AIR IT'LL BE MORE FUN.
DO IT LIVE.
NOW THERE IS AN ISSUE WITH CONSTRUCTION HAPPENING IN THE
BUILDING.
AND CENK HAS EXPERIENCED THIS AND ALSO LOST HIS PATIENCE.
IT BROUGHT BACK MEMORIES.
TAKE A LOOK.
STOP THE HAMMERING.
STOP THE HAMMERING OUT THERE.
WHO HAS A HAMMER?
WHERE IS IT?
WHERE IS THE HAMMER?
GO UP ON THE OTHER FLOOR, SOME OF YOU GO UP THERE AND STOP
THE HAMMERING.
STOP THE HAMMERING.
I WILL GO DOWN TO THE GOT THEM FOR MYSELF AND STOP IT.
GET THE GOT DAMN COMMERCIAL BREAK GOING.
CALL FUCKING PHIL GRIFFIN, I DON'T CARE WHO THE FUCK YOU
HAVE TO CALL.
STOP THE HAMMERING.
EMPTY OUT THE GOT THEM CONTROL ROOM AND FIND OUT WHAT IS GOING
ON THAT IT IS EITHER THERE OR THERE, ARE OUT THERE SOMEWHERE.
IT'S EITHER NORTH OR SOUTH OR EAST OR WEST.
YOU ARE RIGHT, ALMOST EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED TO ME.
I KNOW HE IS HAVING A HARD TIME NOW AND YES WE ARE LAUGHING.
IT IS OKAY, YOU WILL LOVE ONE DAY TOO.
I DIDN'T DO IT ON
AIR BUT IT WAS LITERALLY DRILLING IN THE ROOM ABOVE OUR
HEADS WHEN WE WERE ON AIR AMERICA AT THE TIME.
I GOT ON THE PHONE WITH THE LANDLORD AND I LET IT RIP.
I'VE NEVER HEARD CENK LOSE HIS TEMPER LIKE THAT.
AND YOU GUYS HAVE SEEN HIM LOSE HIS TEMPER ON THE SHOW, BUT IT
WAS SCARY.
IT GOT REAL QUIET IN THE OFFICE.
ON THIS ONE, PROBABLY THE REASON IT GOT LEAKED IS
BECAUSE SOMEONE DID NOT FEEL GOOD ABOUT BEING YELLED AT.
THEY ARE PROBABLY FURIOUSLY TRYING TO FIND OUT WHO THAT IS
RIGHT NOW AS WE SPEAK.
IT WOULD AT LEAST APPEAR THAT HE WAS MUNCHING DOWN, AND THAT IS
THE NO-NO.
WHEN I WAS YELLING AT THE LANDLORD I WAS PUNCHING UP.
I WASN'T RANDOMLY PICKING A PERSON IN THE CONTROL ROOM.
AGAIN, IN HIS DEFENSE, HE IS SUPER FRUSTRATING AND THIS THING
IS CONSTANT IN HIS EAR AND NO ONE IS MAKING IT STOP.
I'M NOT MAKING IT UP, THERE ACTUALLY IS HAMMERING IN MY
EAR, CAN SOMEONE MAKE IT STOP.
WE SHOULD PUT THAT ON THE SOUNDBOARD TWO ñ
SOMEBODY CALL FUCKING PHIL GRIFFIN.
I DON'T KNOW WHY I BOTHER TO SAY HOW WE CUT THE SLOTS WHEN
YOU DON'T DO IT?
I DON'T KNOW WHY ñ SO NOW I HAVE TO CHASE
THOSE STUPID GOD DAMN ENTRAILS THAT YOU ALLOWED HIM TO STICK
OUT THERE.
JESUS CHRIST, CRAZY FUCKING SOUND COMING IN MY EAR.
THIS FUCKING STUPID HAMMERING.
I TOLD YOU WHY I WANTED THOSE FUCKING WORDS CUT.
IT JUST FUCKING SUCKS.
IT FUCKING SUCKS TO BE OUT HERE WITH THIS OUT OF CONTROL SHIT.
ANY FUCKING THINKING COME IN MY EAR AT ANY MOMENT.
THAT'S WHAT I KNOW.
ANYBODY CAN GET INTO MY FUCKING EAR AT ANYTIME.
SOME WOMAN TALKING ABOUT WHAT WE ARE DOING AFTER THE SHOW.
FUCKING GUESS FACES COMING UP IN THE MIDDLE OF A FUCKING SCRIPT.
DUDE, I'M SO HAPPY WE DON'T HAVE TELEPROMPTERS.
YOU BECOME A SLAVE TO THAT SCRIPT.
YOU BECOME SO CONDITIONED TO READ FROM A TELEPROMPTER THAT
YOU FORGET HOW TO BE A HUMAN AND JUST TALK ABOUT THE NEWS LIKE
A HUMAN.
BY THE WAY, THIS IS NOT HIS FAULT, THAT IS JUST THE MODEL
OF TELEVISION NEWS.
THAT IS WHAT YOU LEARN IN JOURNALISM SCHOOL.
YOU LEARN HOW TO OPERATE A FUCKING TELEPROMPTER.
IT NOT ONLY DISCONNECTS YOU FROM THE TOPIC YOU ARE TALKING
ABOUT, IT DISCONNECTS YOU FROM THE AUDIENCE.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE NOT TO LAUGH
WHEN HE SAYS ALL THESE THINGS
COMING IN MY EAR.
IT REMINDED ME OF THE STAR TREK WHERE THE ALIEN BUGS GO INSIDE
THEIR EARS.
BUT IT IS A METAPHOR FOR OVERLY PRODUCED TELEVISION.
WHERE THERE ARE ALL THESE DIFFERENT PEOPLE SPEAKING TO
YOU ABOUT WHAT YOU SHOULD SAY.
THEY THINK IT IS WELL PUT TOGETHER, BUT IT IS OVERLY
PRODUCED.
ALL OF THIS IS FUN AND GAMES.
I HAVE THROWN PENS BEFORE, WHATEVER.
WE HAVE ALL HAD BAD DAYS.
BUT IT IS NOT ALLOWED ON TV.
EVERYTHING HAS TO BE PERFECT.
BUT IT IS MANICURED IN A WAY THAT IS SO ARTIFICIAL, WE ARE
VOMITING THE FAKENESS.
IN FACT WHEN I TALK TO PEOPLE ON THE STREET ABOUT WHY THEY WATCH
US, THEY ALL SAY YOU ARE REAL AND GENUINE.
ONE OF THEM JUST SET IN NEW YORK, IT MADE ME REALIZE IN
HINDSIGHT HOW MUCH THEY ARE ACTING ON TV.
LAWRENCE I KNOW A LITTLE BIT, HE IS A REALLY SMART GUY, AND
OFTENTIMES A FUN GUY.
HE IS HAVING A BAD DAY THERE.
FOR ME IT IS NOT PERSONAL AT ALL, I LIKE HIM.
THAT IS WHY I CALL MOST OF THE PEOPLE ON TV NEWS ACTORS, NOT
NEWS ANCHORS.
BECAUSE SOMEONE IS MESSING WITH THE SCRIPT.
THAT IS WHY HE IS FRUSTRATED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
THAT'S NOT TO SAY THAT HE COULDN'T BE A NEWS ANCHOR.
HE IS A SMART GUY, I JUST FEEL LIKE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE
REPERCUSSIONS WOULD BE IF HE
DECIDED TO SAY FUCK THE SCRIPT.
I DON'T KNOW IF THERE WOULD BE CONSEQUENCES FOR THAT?
THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES.
I WAS LITERALLY IN THAT SAME SEAT.
THIS IS REALLY INTERESTING, WE WILL TALK MORE ABOUT THIS IN
THE POST GAME.
BUT REAL QUICK I REMEMBER FIRST OF ALL WHEN I WAS COMING ON
RIGHT AFTER OBAMA HAD GIVEN A SPEECH ABOUT THE EGYPTIAN
REVOLUTION.
IMMEDIATELY THEY WERE COMING IN MY EAR SAYING DON'T KEEP IT
REAL.
I WILL TELL YOU THE FULL STORY.
THAT WAS A LITERAL THING THAT WAS SAID TO ME.
AT THAT POINT I WAS DOING PROMPTERLESS FOR 10 YEARS.
LET ME GO PROMPTERLESS.
IT WASN'T THAT THEY WANTED IT PERFECTLY PRODUCED.
THAT WAS A
HUGE PART OF THE EQUATION, BUT WHEN YOU REALLY PEELED IT BACK,
IT WAS BECAUSE MANAGEMENT READS THE SCRIPTS AHEAD OF TIME.
YEAH, THEY WANT TO CONTROL IT.
THAT'S RIGHT.
SO THE REASON THEY HAVE A PROMPTER IS THAT YOU
THAT YOU DON'T SAY ANYTHING OFF MESSAGE LIKE AGAINST AN
ADVERTISER, AGAINST POLITICIANS, THAT HASN'T BEEN PREVETTED
AND THAT'S THE REAL PROBLEM OF TELEVISION.
YEAH.
REAL QUICK, LAWRENCE O'DONNELL DID APOLOGIZE FOR
THIS.
HE SAID, A BETTER ANCHORMAN AND A BETTER PERSON
WOULD HAVE HAD A BETTER REACTION TO TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES.
I'M SORRY.
THAT'S A GREAT APOLOGY.
IT IS A GREAT APOLOGY.
I THINK IT'S A GREAT APOLOGY HAD HE BEEN THIS CRAZY TYRANT.
I THINK HE WENT A LITTLE TOO FAR.
YOUR FINE.
IT'S GOING TO BE OKAY.
BUT IT DOESN'T FEEL THAT WAY.
I'M SURE HE'S GETTING A TON OF
HEAT AND EVERYONE'S MAKING FUN OF HIM ONLINE AND SO, YEAH.
FEELS REALLY BAD.
ANOTHER THING I'LL TELL YOU IN THE POST GAME.
ONE TIME I GOT MY SISTER IN A LOT OF TROUBLE AND I SAID ONE
DAY WE'LL LAUGH ABOUT THIS AND SHE SAID, WE'LL NEVER LAUGH
ABOUT
THIS.
I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY WHAT LAWRENCE IS FEELING TODAY.
RIGHT.
BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE.
ONE DAY YOU WILL LAUGH ABOUT IT.
-------------------------------------------
Trump Throws Paper Towels To Puerto Ricans - Duration: 2:32.
DONALD TRUMP IS DOWN IN PUERTO RICO, HE DID HUGE PRESS
CONFERENCE PATTING HIMSELF ON THE BACK, BEFORE HE LEFT HE SAID
WE'VE GOT AN A+ IN HOUSTON AND FLORIDA, SAME THING IN PUERTO
RICO, HE MADE PEOPLE GO AROUND THE TABLE AND PAT HIM ON THE
BACK.
HE WASN'T DONE HAVING FUN.
HERE HE WAS SUPPOSED TO GIVE OUT
SUPPLIES TO THE PEOPLE, REMEMBER WHEN HE WENT DOWN TO HOUSTON AND
INSTEAD OF PUTTING IT IN THE PICKUP TRUCK HE HANDED THE
SUPPLIES THROUGH THE DRIVER WINDOW AND THEY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT
TO DO?
THE GOOFBALL IS AT IT AGAIN BECAUSE HE THINKS 16
PEOPLE DIED, 95% OF THE ISLAND DOESN'T HAVE POWER, PEOPLE CAN'T
REACH THEIR LOVED ONES, LET'S HAVE FUN INSTEAD.
SO WATCH THE
BEGINNING, WHICH IS UNBELIEVABLE, HE THINKS HE'S AT
A BASKETBALL GAME -- OR HE'S A REALITY SHOW HOST, IT REMINDED
ME OF EVERYBODY GETS A CAR --
AND LISTEN TO WHAT HE SAYS AT THE END.
WATCH.
THANK GOD HE DIDN'T THROW THOSE.
DON'T PUT IT PAST HIM.
NOW HERE IT COMES.
I HAVE TO SAY, THERE'S A LOT OF LOVE IN THIS ROOM.
A LOT OF
LOVE IN THIS ROOM.
YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE HELPING VICTIMS OF A HURRICANE.
BUT HE
HAS NO SENSE OF SELF AND NO CONSCIENCE, SO HE'S LIKE THERE'S
A LOT OF LOVE FOR ME, RIGHT?
I THREW PAPER TOWELS AND PEOPLE,
THEY LOVED IT.
LOOK AT THAT, I'M HAVING FUN.
THIS ONE WAS A THREE
POINTER.
THERE'S A LOT OF LOVE IN THIS ROOM.
HE'S LIKE ONE OF
THOSE GUYS THAT BLAST THE T-SHIRTS INTO THE CROWD.
HE'S A
REALITY SHOW HOST, HE'S A CIRCUS CLOWN.
HE CAN'T HELP HIMSELF,
THAT'S WHO HE IS.
WE ELECTED A CLOWN, SO WE SHOULDN'T BE
SURPRISED THAT HE BROUGHT US A THREE RING CIRCUS.
-------------------------------------------
Are Plummeting Marriage Rates A Bad Thing? - Duration: 9:12.
WHY AREN'T PEOPLE GETTING MARRIED?
IS MARRIAGE SIMPLY FOR
THOSE WHO ARE PRIVILEGED?
THAT WAS THE QUESTION IN REGARD TO A
SURVEY DONE BY THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND
OPPORTUNITY AMERICA.
AS WE KNOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE GETTING
MARRIED HAS DECREASED IN RECENT YEARS SO WHAT ARE THE REASONS
BEHIND IT?
WELL --
>>TO GIVE YOU
THE NUMBERS --
>>THE NUMBER, OR THE PERCENTAGE, IS MUCH LOWER FOR
THOSE LIVING IN POVERTY OR STRUGGLING ECONOMICALLY.
TO
COMPARE, BACK IN 1990 THE NUMBERS WERE VERY DIFFERENT --
>>ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS THAT RESPONDENTS MENTIONED WAS THAT,
YEAH, WHEN IT COMES TO MEN WHO WERE STRUGGLING WITH THEIR
FINANCES, WHO WENT ON HAVE GOOD JOBS, WOMEN ARE LESS LIKELY TO
BE INTERESTED IN MARRYING THEM, SO THAT COULD BE PART OF THE
REASON.
ALSO --
>>SO EVEN THOUGH LESS PEOPLE ARE GETTING MARRIED WHEN IT
COMES TO A CERTAIN SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, THAT DOESN'T NECESSARILY
MEAN THEY'RE HAVING LESS KIDS.
THE OVERALL BIRTHRATE IN AMERICA
HAS DECREASED SLIGHTLY, BUT FOR THE MOST PART BIRTHRATES HAVE
BEEN STEADY.
>>THAT'S A BIG NUMBER, A BIG DIFFERENCE.
51% IN 1990 OF POOR
ADULTS, NOW ONLY 26%, CUT IN HALF BASICALLY.
THERE ARE A
COUPLE FACTORS AND IT'S INTERESTING, ONE OF THE MOST
INTERESTING PART IS THAT THE POOR ECONOMY CAN LEAD TO A
VICIOUS CYCLE WHICH CREATES THIS, BUT ONCE IT SETS INTO THE
CULTURE IT THEN BECOMES HARD TO REVERSE.
WHICH I THINK WE DON'T
NECESSARILY HAVE TO REVERSE.
THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE IS
A CONSERVATIVE THINK TANK, THEY MIGHT HAVE DONE THE STUDY -- I'M
NOT DOUBTING THE RESULTS -- TO SEE MORE PEOPLE SHOULD GET
MARRIED.
NOT NECESSARILY.
IN FULL CHAR RATE THAT IF YOU GO IN
THE SEQUENCED THEY -- GETTING A DEGREE FIRST, THEN A JOB, THEN
MARRIED, THEN A BABY, YOU'RE MORE LIKELY TO STAY OUT OF
POVERTY AND HAVE A HIGHER INCOME, BUT THAT'S NOT
NECESSARILY A CAUSATION.
AND IF YOU HAVE A DEGREE OF COURSE YOU
ARE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE A BETTER JOB, AND IF YOU ARE STABLE
ENOUGH TO HAVE THOSE THINGS YOU MIGHT HAVE A HIGHER INCOME.
YOU
MIGHT HAVE BEEN BORN INTO A SITUATION WHERE YOU ARE MORE
LIKELY TO HAVE A HIGHER INCOME WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO GET MARRIED
AND HAVE AN EXPENSIVE WEDDING, ETC., SO I JUST THINK THE TREND
IS REAL, BUT IT MIGHT ALSO HAVE TO DO WITH OUR VIEWS ABOUT
MARRIAGE OVERALL, AND MAYBE WE AREN'T MONOGAMOUS.
>>ANA TOUCHED ON WOMEN MAYBE NOT BEING IS INTERESTED IN MEN THAT
HAVE NO PROSPECTS, THAT'S USUALLY A FACTOR AT SOME LEVEL,
IT SHOULD BE FOR MEN ALSO THEORETICALLY -- BUT I JUST
IMAGINE THAT INCOME INEQUALITY, THAT'S -- THERE HAS BEEN A
DRAMATIC CHANGE IN INCOME INEQUALITY SINCE 1990, THE
BIGGEST DROP AS CENK SAID IS FOR POOR ADULTS, IT'S AT THE BOTTOM
AND WHERE THE MOST SIGNIFICANT DECLINE IS, AND I IMAGINE IF YOU
ARE POOR AND HAVE NO PROSPECTS THEN GETTING MARRIED AND
STARTING A LIFE AND HAVING A FAMILY THAT ALSO FEELS YOU MIGHT
HAVE PROSPECTS BUT YOU DON'T FEEL LIKE YOU HAVE ANY, I
IMAGINE THAT'S AN IMPEDIMENT AND AS LONG AS THERE IS THIS GAP IN
INCOME INEQUALITY THERE WILL BE SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES TO THAT AND
THIS IS PROBABLY OR A GOOD BET I DON'T KNOW A GOOD BIT THIS
IS ONE OF THOSE CONSEQUENCES.
>>IT WAS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.
I WOULD ALSO
ARGUE THAT THE CENTRALITY OF A WHITE WEDDING AND THE COST OF
THAT WEDDING IS A DETERRENT, IN THE INCREASE OF COHABITATION,
AND A LOT OF FOLKS WITH COLLEGE DEGREES ARE NOW POOR.
A LOT OF
THINGS NEED TO BE UNPACKED AS TO HOW THEY COLLECTED THIS DATA, I
EXPECT THERE ARE ALSO DIFFERENCES ACROSS RACE IN TERMS
OF SOME OF THE CULTURAL ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO FOLKS GETTING
MARRIED EARLIER OR LATER AND ACROSS CERTAIN SOCIOECONOMIC
STATUSES.
>>ONE CULTURAL ISSUE, FOR EXAMPLE MORMONS GET MARRIED
EARLIER GENERALLY SPEAKING, AND THOSE ARE AMONG THE FACTORS NOT
CONSIDERED IN THE STUDY.
THAT'S WHY THINK THE RIGHT WING VIEW OF
THE WORLD IS OFTEN COMICAL.
IT'S A MATTER OF MORALITY.
NO, OF
COURSE SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS PLAY INTO THE TRENDS WE ARE
SEEING.
IF SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS DIDN'T PLAY A ROLE,
WHY ISN'T THE MARRIAGE RATE CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE
DIFFERENT CLASSES?
AND IT'S NOT.
IT'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE IF YOU
ARE POOR AS OPPOSED TO IF YOU HAVE MORE MONEY.
AND CULTURE
DOES MATTER, BUT THAT'S WHERE I DISAGREE WITH CONSERVATIVES, A
LOT OF YOU WON'T REMEMBER THIS BUT THERE WAS A HUGE SCANDAL
WHEN MURPHY BROWN HAD A CHARACTER HAVE A CHILD OUT
OF WEDLOCK.
>>MURPHY BROWN.
>>I CAN'T BELIEVE SHE DID THAT, DAN QUAYLE SPOKE OUT, SAID THEY
WOULD HAVE A CULTURAL EFFECT, I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS A BAD THING.
WE AS A CULTURE ARE SAYING I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED MARRIAGE.
>>BUT THE NUMBERS BEAR OUT THAT IF YOU ARE MARRIED AND YOU HAVE
A CHILD YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO STAY TOGETHER, IT'S NOT A
GUARANTEE OBVIOUSLY, A LOT OF COUPLES WITH KIDS DIVORCE, BUT
YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO STAY TOGETHER AND THAT CHILD IS MORE
LIKELY TO BE RAISED WITH BOTH BIOLOGICAL PARENTS.
>>AND THERE ARE BENEFITS TO THAT.
>>IT IS DIFFICULT FOR SINGLE MOTHERS TO MAKE ENDS MEET AND I
THINK CERTAIN NECESSITIES TO CREATE A GOOD FOUNDATION FOR
THAT KID ARE COMPROMISED AS A RESULT.
I'M MAKING GENERALIZATIONS, JUST TO BE CLEAR JUST BECAUSE
YOU ARE A SINGLE MOM DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN PROVIDE, LOTS
OF SINGLE MOMS TO A GREAT JOB, BUT WE KNOW HOW EXPENSIVE
AND DIFFICULT EDUCATION IS CONSIDERING WAGES BEING
STAGNANT, A DUAL INCOME HOUSEHOLD IS IMPORTANT.
>>I FEEL LIKE WE ARE HOLDING ONTO THE HORSE AND BUGGY.
RIGHT
NOW IN THIS WINDOW OF TIME IF YOU ARE MARRIED AND HAVE BOTH
BIOLOGICAL PARENTS YOU ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE BETTER OFF, BUT
EVENTUALLY THE CULTURE WILL SHIFT AND ADJUST AND WE MIGHT
FIND A NEW WAY OF COHABITATING THAT MAKES SURE THE KIDS ARE ALL
RIGHT, WE HAVEN'T YET BUT WE ARE IN THIS MIDDLE GROUND WHERE
MARRIAGE IS DISINTEGRATING, BUT WE DON'T HOLD ONTO IT FOR
DEAR LIFE.
>>BUT IF YOU ARE GOING TO COHABITATE AND RAISE A CHILD
TOGETHER, WHY NOT GET MARRIED AND GET THAT SWEET TAX-CUT?
>>BUT WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT GETTING INVOLVED IN THAT?
IT'S
PREPOSTEROUS.
YOU ARE ENCOURAGING MARRIAGE AND I DON'T THINK THAT'S
NECESSARILY THE RIGHT ANSWER GOING FORWARD.
>>IT IS A BIG CHANGE, IT MIGHT HAPPEN BUT IT WON'T HAPPEN AS
FAST AS YOU THINK.
NOTHING HAPPENS AS FAST AS YOU THINK.
YOU ARE PROBABLY RIGHT, BUT LIKE FIVE GENERATIONS FROM NOW.
THERE
IS A VALUE IN STAYING MARRIED FOR KIDS, IF YOU DON'T HAVE
KIDS, GET OUT NOW.
>>I DON'T KNOW THAT I WOULD GO THAT FAR.
>>IF YOU DO HAVE KIDS -- DO YOU HAVE KIDS?
>>I DON'T.
>>THERE SHOULD BE 1/3 PERSON.
>>WOW, LIBERALS.
>>IF WE DIDN'T HAVE A KID I'M PRETTY SURE MY WIFE WOULD
HAVE LEFT ME LESS LIKE.
-------------------------------------------
Learn Colors with bad baby, bad kids & spiderman, superhero cars 3, Finger Family Song Nursery Rhym - Duration: 2:01.
Please comment, like, share, and subcribe my channel for more video
Please comment, like, share, and subcribe my channel for more video
Please comment, like, share, and subcribe my channel for more video
-------------------------------------------
Single-Handed Racing Setup | Xbox One - Duration: 4:52.
At SpecialEffect we often help people who'd like to play games on their standard
controller using their left or their right hand. Two ways we do this are by
remapping the controls within the controller settings or by using an
external accessibility switch. In this video we'll show how you can use these
two techniques to play the game Forza on Xbox One. We will first look at the
left hand and then the right hand. In racing games, the left stick is used to
steer the car the right trigger is often used to accelerate and the left trigger
is used for brake. Controls such as handbrake or look back are often face
buttons whilst gears up and down are frequently the bumpers so those using
manual gears. Some people prefer to use the controller flat, while others would
rather use a hand grip. Some people use their chins to control the left stick
For some players, moving controls to the left side of the controller may be more
comfortable. For instance, moving accelerate to left trigger we could also
remove some of the other functions such as the face buttons across to the d-pad
You can do this in the control settings for some games or in the Xbox menu.
Go to "All Settings" then "Ease of Access." Go to "Controller" and then "Button Mapping"
First we'll swap the triggers by selecting this tick box and remap
We will also map X to left on the d-pad for our handbrake
And the right bumper to up on the d-pad for look backwards
As we can't swap triggers with buttons in the Xbox button remapping settings and
the right trigger might be hard to reach now that brake is there. We could either swap
this in the in-game settings to another reachable button, or, if this
wasn't possible with a certain title, we could add an accessibility switch to
control this, or use another movement to press the trigger. Here we are adding a
switch emulating the right trigger for brake, which we'll press with the
back of our hand. The switches can be positioned wherever you would like to
control them. Here we are using a foot movement. There are a variety of
interfaces you can plug switches in to, for use on the Xbox One. Here we are
using a Don Johnston PC interface alongside the CrossHair adapter to get
the switch working with the console and connect it to the controller
When using the right hand only, some players may prefer to use their controller
flat, whilst others prefer to hold the controller using the grip for single
hand us. Some people use their chins to control. If you are using your right
hand only, you can swap the sticks so that the right stick is used to steer
and is easier to reach when gripping the controller. To do this, go to "All Settings,"
then "Ease of Access." Go to controller and then "Button Mapping." Select the tick box
saying "Swap Sticks." The sticks function will now be swapped with each other
As before, we could also add accessibility switches to emulate the functions of
buttons which are hard to reach. Here we have added a switch for braking. We are
using the Don Johnston switch interface along with a CrossHair adapter to get it
working on the console and connect it with the controller, but alternative
interfaces are available. You can try different layouts and button assignments
to work out what works best for you. Thank you for watching this video and if
you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with SpecialEffect
-------------------------------------------
GALATASARAY | 5 EKİM 2017 | SABAH SPORU GS GÜNDEMİ FULL | ÇİĞDEM CEYLAN & TANER KARAMAN | Youtube - Duration: 18:41.
For more infomation >> GALATASARAY | 5 EKİM 2017 | SABAH SPORU GS GÜNDEMİ FULL | ÇİĞDEM CEYLAN & TANER KARAMAN | Youtube - Duration: 18:41. -------------------------------------------
বাহারাম বাদশা নীল পরী kissa Pala /Baharam Badsha Nil Pori / Ajmot Alli / Bulbul Audio Center - Duration: 1:45:21.
please Subscribe My Channel
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét