Welcome to Space News from the Electric Universe, brought to you by The
Thunderbolts Project at Thunderbolts.info
What lies at the center of our galaxy? For many decades, astrophysicists
have told us that at the core of the Milky Way and 98% of all galaxies is a
supermassive black hole, a hypothetical "region of space-time" whose
gravitational effects are so colossal that nothing, not even light can escape.
Scientists believe that supermassive black holes explain the stupendous
energies and mass measured at galactic cores and many fantastic
electromagnetic phenomena including powerful galactic jets and X-ray
emissions are attributed to black holes influences. In fact, for many years
scientific and educational literature have presented the existence of black
holes as a matter of settled science and science media routinely report truly
amazing claims about black holes with no skepticism. Of course, a recent example in
2016, was the media firestorm resulting from the pronounced detection of
gravitational waves which was supposedly produced by two colliding black holes a
billion years ago. Subsequent, such claims have been met with an equal absence of
media scrutiny. However, we note that a recent scientific paper entitled "On the
Signal Processing Operations in LIGO signals" should raise serious questions
about the validity of the gravitational waves claims. The abstract of the paper
authored by UC Berkeley's Akhila Raman states that the first five reported
gravitational waves events are, "...very weak signals whose amplitude does
not rise significantly during the gravitational waves event, and they are
indistinguishable from non-stationary detector noise." A link to the article may
be found in the description box of this video.
Unfortunately, the paper has not received a fraction of the
media attention that the claimed gravitational waves discoveries have
garnered. Paradoxically, these same media also routinely report discoveries that
would challenge the very existence of black holes,
if astronomers and astrophysicists were willing to entertain such a possibility.
But rather than forcing any reassessment of foundational theory, the discoveries
are simply presented as exciting puzzles for working scientists. A good example is
found in a recent paper on scientists' observation of star formation that is
occurring impossibly close to the Milky Way's hypothetical black hole. A phys.org
report introduces the conundrum as follows, "At the center of our galaxy,
in the immediate vicinity of its supermassive black hole, is a region
wracked by powerful tidal forces and bathed in intense ultraviolet light and
X-ray radiation. These harsh conditions, astronomers surmise, do not favor star
formation, especially low-mass stars like our Sun. Surprisingly, new observations...
suggest otherwise." Scientists using the ALMA telescope discovered evidence of a
total of 11 low-mass stars forming within just three light years to the
hypothetical black hole. As the phys.org report notes, "At this distance, tidal
forces driven by the supermassive black hole should be energetic enough to rip
apart clouds of dust and gas before they can form stars." The lead author of the
new paper says, "Despite all odds, we see the best evidence yet that low-mass
stars are forming startlingly close to the supermassive black hole at the
center of the Milky Way. This is a genuinely surprising result and one that
demonstrates just how robust star formation can be, even in the most
unlikely of places." But of course, this is not the first time that our Galaxy's
hypothetical black hole has mystified astronomers with its behavior. For
several years, scientists around the world
eagerly awaited the approach of the gas cloud G2 to the supposed black hole. The
standard expectation was that the cloud would undoubtedly be, "devoured" as
it entered the black hole's domain. Apparently, the black hole was not
feeling hungry as the gas cloud was left intact to the amazement of astronomers
around the world. Hopelessly problematic black hole behavior has been observed at
all scales throughout the cosmos In 2012, we reported on scientists'
observations of two bright radio spots in the globular cluster M22 which they
interpret as two small black holes. But Standard Theory dictates that only one
black hole at most, can exist in the cluster of tightly packed stars. The
National Radio Astronomy Observatory reported of the findings. "Simulations
have indicated that these black holes would fall toward the center of the
cluster, then begin a violent gravitational dance with each other, in
which all of them or perhaps all but a single one would be thrown completely
out of the cluster." The author of a paper on the findings stated, "We didn't find
what we were looking for, but instead found something very surprising -- two
smaller black holes. That's surprising because most theorists said there should
be at most one black hole in the cluster." At a much vaster scale at the farthest
reaches of the observable universe, we see in ever greater detail, stupendous
electromagnetic phenomena that are not predicted nor explained by black hole
theory. As we've reported several times, in 2016 a Royal Astronomical Society
press release reported the discovery that, "...supermassive black holes in a
region of the distant universe are all spinning out radio jets in the same
direction..." A lead investigator, professor Romeel Dave said of the findings, "This is
not obviously expected based on our current understanding of cosmology. It's
a bizarre finding." As noted by Professor Andrew Russ Taylor, "...these black holes
don't know about each other, or have any way of exchanging information or
influencing each other directly over such vast scales..." In the Electric
Universe, such cosmic alignments, completely unexpected
by standard cosmology, are both predicted and required if the dominant
organizational force is electromagnetism. The electric universe theory proposes
that space across cosmic distances has a substructure of twisted-pair current
filaments with stars and galaxies forming along them like pearls on a
string, and having their spin axes aligned along their filaments. Space
discovery continues to confirm this prediction including the Herschel Space
Observatory's imaging of vast networks of star-forming filaments. In fact, the
phenomenon of spectacular cosmic jets, sometimes hundreds of thousands of light
years long, dramatically reveals the tunnel vision of gravity center
cosmology. Radio astronomers who have measured the electric current in an
extra galactic jet, have proposed that the black hole creates a powerful
magnetic field which then produces the jet's electric current. But mysterious
magnetism will never explain the tremendous electromagnetic emissions
that are now routinely detected throughout the cosmos. As we've outlined
in dozens of episodes, the concepts of Plasma Cosmology and the Electric
Universe offer very different predictions and explanations for the
phenomena astronomers attribute to black holes. At the center of galaxies is not a
black hole but an ultra-high density energy storage phenomenon called a
plasmoid, a kind of load in the Galactic electrical circuit. In a galactic circuit,
electrical power flows inward along the spiral arms lighting the Stars as it
goes and is concentrated and stored in the central plasmoid. When the plasmoid
reaches a threshold density it discharges, usually along the galaxy's
spin axis. The Electric Universe proposes this is in fact the source of the
stupendous cosmic jets. Indeed, a recent scientific paper reveals that nature is
confounding all of cosmologists' predictions about black holes' magnetic
properties. A phys.org report on the finding states, "Black holes are famous
for their muscle: an intense gravitational pull known to gobble up
entire stars and launch streams of matter into space
at almost the speed of light. It turns out the reality may not live up to the
hype...
University of Florida scientists have discovered these tears in the fabric of
the universe have significantly weaker magnetic fields than previously thought."
The unsolved mystery that the report acknowledges is, "...how 'jets' of
particles traveling at nearly the speed of light shoot out of black holes'
magnetic field." The study co-author states, "The question is, how do you do
that? Our surprisingly low measurements will
force new constraints on theoretical models that previously focused on strong
magnetic fields accelerating and directing the jet flows. We weren't
expecting this, so it changes much of what we thought we knew." As noted in a
public comment by Thunderbolts colleague Chris Reeve, "The picture which is
emerging is of the black hole as non- falsifiable. It really does not seem to
matter how many null results accumulate; since theorists need them to be there,
they will continue to insist that they ARE there." In fact, we have noted a
fundamental challenge to the very question of whether Einstein's
mathematics predict black holes. As explained by physicist Wal Thornhill in
his Space Sews interview on gravitational waves,
"It's a self-serving myth that Einstein's mathematics predicts black holes. The
originators of black hole theory in 1965, including Thorne, chose not to mention
that Einstein's October 1939 paper which they refer to, concludes with, "The
'Schwarzschild singularity'" the term black hole had not been introduced then, "does not
appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily and this is
due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the
velocity of light." Einstein showed mathematically that
black holes cannot form gravitationally for the same reason that stars and
planets cannot. Because the infalling matter begins to circle the center of
mass until the centrifugal force balances the gravitational force. The
observational evidence now shows that stars and planets are formed by the
powerful electromagnetic force produced in electromagnetic pinches along cosmic
lightning philaments in molecular clouds. Gravitational
collapse theory is now discredited by direct observation. For continuous
updates on Space News from the Electric Universe, stay tuned to Thunderbolts.info
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét