Thứ Hai, 4 tháng 12, 2017

Waching daily Dec 4 2017

Wow! Great reflexes!

- Thanks. - No problem.

Hey, you have blue eyes. I didn't notice without your glasses.

You just get contacts?

Well, see you.

- What happened? - He's freaking weird.

Did you see that?

Parker?

- It's a fight! - Think you're funny don't you, freak?

- Flash, it was an accident. - My fist breaking your teeth is the accident.

- C'mon Flash, stop. - I don't want to fight you Flash.

- I wouldn't want to fight me neither. - Kick his ass.

Help him, Harry.

How'd he do that?

Which one?

He's all yours, man.

Flash, get up!

Jesus, Parker, you are a freak.

That was amazing.

I'm out of here. Come on.

For more infomation >> Peter Parker vs Flash Thompson | Spider-Man (2002) Movie Clip - Duration: 3:44.

-------------------------------------------

Okuni Shrine - Shizuoka - 小國神社 - 4K Ultra HD - Duration: 6:54.

Located in the heart of Shizuoka's peaceful and beautiful countryside and an hour away by car from Hamamatsu,

Okuni Shrine is one of the four major Shinto Shrines in the Shizuoka prefecture.

According to past official documents, Okuni Shrine was established on February 18,

555 and enshrines the deity known as O-na-muchi No Mikoto, also known as Okunimushi No Mikoto (The Great Land Master).

Since then the Temple received the Imperial offerings and its special envoy every year and many centuries later on June 13,

1874 the Meiji government gave Okuni Shrine the rank of Kokuhei-Shosha class of Nationally significant shrines.

For more infomation >> Okuni Shrine - Shizuoka - 小國神社 - 4K Ultra HD - Duration: 6:54.

-------------------------------------------

How Can You Tell If You're Being Spiritually Guided 14 Discernme - Duration: 10:46.

How Can You Tell If You�re Being Spiritually Guided 14 Discernment Tools

I�m in Boulder, Colorado right now with Trevor Hart, leading a Sounds True event about

trusting the invisible forces of love to guide you in your life.

Yesterday, we spent all day talking about how we can invoke spiritual guidance, the

tools and practices that can help you receive guidance, and what gets in the way of opening

to this kind of guidance. Today, we�ll be focusing on the tricky topic of discernment.

As Sounds True founder Tami Simon pointed out yesterday, without discernment, we can

become flat-out delusional in our efforts to seek out spiritual guidance.

�What if someone sees seven butterflies,� she asked, �and he assumes that means he�s

supposed to get seven wives?� We laughed at her example, but seriously � Hitler thought

he was being spiritually guided to purify his race. Discernment is key.

Without clear tools of discernment, an attempt to seek out and follow spiritual guidance

can turn psychotic. After all, many schizophrenics think the television is talking only to them!

The only thing that separates the mystics from the sociopaths and psychotics is discernment.

We�ll be talking about many tools for discernment in today�s Sounds True program, as well

as in the 10 month Mystery School immersion Trevor and I will be teaching this year.

In short, there�s no simple answer to the question, �How can you tell if you�re

being spiritually guided?� In fact, the very question calls to mind a story Rabbi

Reb Zalman told about an enlightened master whose disciples were concerned about choosing

another spiritual teacher after he died.

The master told them to ask any prospective teachers a question. �Ask him what we should

do with our thoughts that interrupt us in meditation, that drag us away.

If he answers you, don�t take him as a teacher. It�s too facile to give such an answer.�

In some ways, discerning whether you�re receiving accurate spiritual guidance is similar.

If anyone tries to tell you they know for sure when they�re receiving clear guidance,

be skeptical.

With that disclaimer, here are some key questions you can use to double-check yourself when

you think you might be receiving spiritual guidance.

Keep in mind that no single one of these questions is adequate for discernment. Don�t interpret

your answers to all these questions literally. Use these questions as a prompt for your own

intuition and discernment.

14 DISCERNMENT QUESTIONS

14. DOES IT FEEL LIKE ��SHACKLES ON� OR �SHACKLES OFF�?

Does this make you feel like you�re in prison, or unfettered? Is the cage door open or closed?

Do you feel the heaviness of the shackles or the lightness of being that comes with

freedom?

Martha Beck writes, �The Buddha often said that wherever you find water, you can tell

if it�s the ocean because the ocean always tastes of salt.�

By the same token, anywhere you find enlightenment�whatever improbable or unfamiliar shape it may have

assumed�you can tell it�s enlightenment because enlightenment always tastes of freedom.

Not comfort. Not ease. Freedom.� If you feel like you�re being guided, does it feel

like freedom?

13. IS IT KIND?

If you think you�re being guided to do something overtly cruel, insensitive or unkind, think

again. Don�t mistake kindness for people-pleasing though.

Trustworthy spiritual guidance is kind at heart, but it can also be tough love � complete

with strict boundary setting and ferocious love.

You may be guided to break a people-pleasing co-dependence pattern that may feel to someone

else like your new boundary setting isn�t as kind as usual. Check the kindness meter

in your own heart. Your heart will know.

12. IS THERE ALIVENESS HERE?

This is a vitality check. True spiritual guidance rarely tells you to do something that makes

you feel dead inside. The rational mind, the fear-based inner critic or the task-master

superego may order you to do something that feels deadening, but spiritual guidance will

not.

11. DOES IT EXHAUST ME OR FILL ME WITH DREAD?

Your true nature may ask you to complete tasks that require you to hunker down and focus.

You may even feel a certain weariness after saying yes to a calling that puts you on the

front line of something big and scary.

But even if your body is tired, you will also feel a certain excitement, a rightness and

lightness of being, and positive flow of energy through your body. You may feel scared.

You may have butterflies in your solar plexus. But if you feel dread, you can be pretty certain

the guidance isn�t pure.

10. DOES IT NOURISH OR DEPLETE ME?

Even when spiritual guidance asks you to do something that requires a lot of energy, true

guidance will only ask you to do things that fill you with spiritual energy and do not

require you to give away all of you own personal energy.

9. DOES IT FEEL NATURAL, EFFICIENT, EASEFUL, PEACEFUL AND GRACEFUL?

This question, from Joan Borysenko and Gordon Dveirin�s wonderful book Your Soul�s Compass,

always help me breathe more easily when I�m discerning whether guidance is real.

As they discovered by interviewing priests, rabbis, Sufi masters, Christian mystics, sages,

intuitive, and gurus, spiritual guidance usually feels natural, efficient, easeful, peaceful

and graceful.

8. DOES IT MAKE SENSE?

While spiritual guidance may often ask you to do things that feel crazy, common sense

is still a useful discernment tool. It certainly didn�t make sense when my spiritual guidance

told me to leave my job as a doctor ten years ago.

So as with all the questions, this question doesn�t work on its own. But if spiritual

guidance is asking you to do something that violates your common sense, slow down. Ask

for clarification and confirmation. If you�re not sure, it�s OK to ask for more guidance.

7. WILL IT HURT ANYONE?

As with the �Is it kind?� question, this doesn�t mean your irresponsible 30-year-old

son won�t get his feelings hurt when you set a boundary and tell him he has to move

out of the house if he can�t contribute to the household as a mature adult.

It also doesn�t mean you may not be guided to hurt someone who breaks into your house

and is threatening your kids. It�s simply a prompt to remind you that if your guidance

is potentially dangerous or hurtful to someone else, double check yourself.

6. WOULD LOVE DO THIS?

This is one of my favorite questions because it�s so expansive. What would love to do?

Sometimes love forgives unforgivable acts.

Sometimes love leaves. But there�s nothing more powerful in the universe.

5. HOW DOES THIS FEEL IN MY BODY?

Does your body feel contracted or expansive? Is it saying �Hell yeah� or �Hell no?�

When you consider what you feel you are guided to do, do you get a headache or feel nauseous?

Do you feel exhausted or enlivened? Does your heart light up?

In my experience, the trustworthy spiritual guidance doesn�t rush you unless someone�s

life is at risk. If you�re not clear, you can always ask the invisible forces of love

for confirmation.

Pray for another sign, a dream, a clear knowing or seeing or gut instinct. Slow down and get

quiet. Listen deeply. Pay attention. You will get your answer.

You just may not get your answer on someone else�s deadline. If you feel pressured to

rush, the answer is probably �Not yet.� Urgency usually stems from fear and scarcity.

But true guidance isn�t afraid and it�s ever-plentiful. There�s always enough.

4. IS IT COERCIVE OR CONTROLLING?

If what you feel guided to do is coercive or controlling of someone else, pause. Love

doesn�t coerce or control.

3. IS IT ETHICAL AND ALIGNED WITH MY CORE VALUES?

This one is so important that I could write a whole blog post just about this. I met a

shaman who defended his sexual molestation of a client because he said, �I was being

spiritually guided to give her a sexual healing.� Bullshit.

I�m not saying that ethics are black and white or that you might be led into the grey

territory from time to time, but if you think you�re being guided to do something that

might be a blatant ethics violation, think again.

2. WILL THIS CULTIVATE THE STILLNESS IN ME?

This one is HUGE and it�s not often emphasized in our busy, rushed culture. So many things

you might enjoy leave you feeling hyped up, manic, and on edge.

As one guy who lived on a wild game reserve in Africa told me when he was breaking up

with his girlfriend, �I used to think that the excited feeling I got when I was with

her was love.

But then I realized it was actually the feeling I get when I�m with an unpredictable wild

animal.� Sometimes what we interpret as excitement is actually a physiological stress

response. Choose the people, work, and experiences that cultivate relaxation responses in your

nervous system.

1. WHAT�S TRUE AND NOT TRUE ABOUT THIS SITUATION?

Sometimes we get confused because we think it�s a black or white answer we�re seeking.

But maybe it�s both/and. Sometimes the solution that resonates in your heart is a paradox.

Are you being guided? Do you have what the Quakers would call a �leading?� Run through

these questions and see if they help.

Also, don�t be afraid to seek out trustworthy guidance from therapists, spiritual counselors,

and reputable intuitive, energy healers and shamans. Often, they can help confirm what

you already know in your heart of hearts.

For more infomation >> How Can You Tell If You're Being Spiritually Guided 14 Discernme - Duration: 10:46.

-------------------------------------------

Fearless Trump Heads West to Shrink Fed Lands, Return Property Obama Took - Duration: 3:36.

Fearless: Trump Heads West to Shrink Fed Lands, Return Property Obama Took

President Donald Trump is set to drastically slash two major pieces of federal lands in

the American West in what's seen as a major blow to legacy monuments created by both Barack

Obama and Bill Clinton.

According to The Washington Times, Trump will travel to Salt Lake City, Utah on Monday to

announce he's slashing the size of two large swaths of federal land in Utah created under

the Clinton and Obama administrations, the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument

and the Bears Ears National Monument.

The plan, which has long been in the works, has drawn protests from environmentalists

and Native American activists, who claim that the cuts are an insult to Native Americans

and illegal, according to Fox News.

However, conservatives have long contended that both monuments were nothing more than

an usurpation of land by the federal government by abusing the 1906 Antiquities Act.

The move has been a long time in coming; in October, it was reported that Trump had called

Utah GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch and told him he was approving a plan by Interior Secretary

Ryan Zinke that would reverse federal protection on 3.6 million acres of land.

In the case of Bears Ears National monument, that means a 85 percent reduction of federally-protected

land.

Zinke has been reviewing the situation since this spring; the decision that Trump is expected

to announce Monday would return control of the land to local governments as opposed to

putting it under federal oversight.

While both the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument and the Bears Ears National Monument

have been controversial land grabs, the latter has generated far more attention as of late.

On his way out the door last year, former President Obama decided to use the Antiquities

Act to create the monument — one of 29 he created during his presidency for a grand

total of 553 million acres of land under the control of the federal government.

The problem with that is that while the Antiquities Act does give the president the power to create

monuments, it specifically states that they need to a) be confined to as small an area

as possible and b) limited to "protecting specific artifacts or other items of cultural

and historical significance," according to The Washington Times.

Something tells me that could have been accomplished without taking 553 million acres.

GOP Rep. Rob Bishop agrees, especially in the case of the two monuments in his home

state of Utah.

"Utah has become ground zero for politically motivated national monument designations that

are excessive in size and contemptuous of peoples' livelihoods," stated Rep. Bishop,

chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee.

"The president has stood against prior abuses of executive power, and his administration

has demonstrated a commitment to work in concert with local communities to protect unique public

antiquities and objects the right way."

This didn't stop 5,000 protesters from coming out to Utah's State Capitol on Saturday

to rally against the plan.

Because, you know, Donald Trump, "the resistance," #NotMyPresident, etc.

"I want him to visit Bears Ears before he takes any action," Navajo Nation Attorney

General Ethel Branch said.

Well, I'm sure the president can visit it as state property — the way that it was

before Obama took it.

What do you think about this?

Please Share this news if you agree with what President Trump is about to do.

Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe top stories today.

For more infomation >> Fearless Trump Heads West to Shrink Fed Lands, Return Property Obama Took - Duration: 3:36.

-------------------------------------------

Interracial Dating Is Not a Phase - Duration: 2:08.

why don't you just date black guys I'm like no like this is something and I

have to you know tell him that story all over again I'm like this is not

something that's new well the first time I knew that I was attracted to white

guys was when I was in kindergarten I we had Moeller buddies that came to our

school they were like all boy high school I need to come in and help us

with like activities and things like that and my Moeller buddy name was Tim

and every time Tim came in I was super excited and I was crushing so every time

I seen him it would be a good experience and I knew then that's whenever I was

down with this world my family doesn't mind the fact that I you know I'm down

with the swirl my dad is kind of leery about it but I don't really care I don't

care at all it's my preference if that's what makes me happy it makes me happy

My friends Lisa and Tahila they umm... Lisa she's dated a white guy once she's

talked to him so she's not she's not you know against it my friend Tahila

she's dating a white guy once and she's not against it but right now she's

currently dating a black guy but they're they're more towards going you know

dating black guys me I'm just I'm completely down since were like I don't

really want to date inside my race so... My friends do support me dating outside

my race they sometimes they're like why don't you just date black guys I'm like no like

this is something and I have to you know tell them that story all over again I'm

like this is not something that's new like this is something that I've always

how always felt like a crush on a movie you know actors and white guys, it's nothing

not nothing new to me it's not a faze. Any advice that I can give to anyone

who's thinking or wanting to date outside the race my best advice is go

for it it's nothing wrong with it it's a beautiful thing two different worlds

becoming one big diverse world that to me is just beautiful

For more infomation >> Interracial Dating Is Not a Phase - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

The Last Time the Globe Warmed - Duration: 10:54.

Thanks to Curiosity Stream for supporting PBS Digital Studios.

Imagine an enormous rainforest teeming with life: trees, insects, pretty little birds.

Primates are climbing in the canopy, while crocodiles and turtles swim in the rivers

below.

Beautiful, isn't it?

Now imagine this lush rainforest ... in the Arctic.

There was a time -- and not too long ago -- when the world warmed more than any human has ever

seen.

So far.

This ancient warming took place over the course of just 200,000 years -- the blink of an eye

in geologic time -- and it ended much like it began: suddenly and mysteriously.

It all started 56 million years ago, at the very end of the Paleocene

Epoch.

Back then, life was still recovering from the unpleasantness of the Cretaceous-Paleogene

extinction event, which wiped out the non-avian dinosaurs.

And things were already warm by today's standards.

There were no polar ice caps, which meant sea levels were much higher.

And the continents -- which were just beginning to take a familiar shape -- were covered in

habitats like temperate forests, and deserts, and a belt of rainforests around the equator.

But this environment was about to change.

In fewer than 20 thousand years, the global average temperature increased by 5 to 8 degrees

Celsius.

And the warming was greatest at higher latitudes.

So, at the poles, temps on land reached an average of 23 degrees, while the ocean waters

got up to a balmy 20 degrees, This means you could've gone for a comfy swim in the seas

around Antarctica!

This remarkable and sudden warming event is known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum,

or PETM, and it had a massive effect on life on Earth.

For one thing, when the PETM reached its peak, rainforests had expanded much farther than

they ever had before.

Fossils from North America, Europe, and Asia reveal habitats rich in plant life that today

are associated with tropical rainforests -- even though these forests were nowhere

near the tropics.

The fossilized fronds of palm trees have been found as far north as Wyoming, for example.

And some places within the Arctic Circle, like Ellesmere Island in Canada, show evidence

of ferns, redwoods, and gingkos.

So.

How was all of this -- any of this -- possible?

Our best clues can be found in ancient sediments.

Marine sediment samples from Maryland to Antarctica show that, about 56 million years ago, there

was a sudden spike in the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the

oceans.

And judging by the types of carbon found in these sediments, the gases likely came from

organic matter, like plants.

See, plants, like most living things, prefer to use the lighter and more common isotope

of carbon, carbon-12, as opposed to heavier isotopes, like carbon-13.

So, this biogenic carbon -- which we've talked about before -- has a different chemical

signature than carbon that's never been part of a living organism.

And, sediments that date to the start of the PETM, show a large and sudden drop in the

ratio of carbon-13, compared to carbon-12.

This means that a bunch of biogenic carbon must have suddenly been released into the

atmosphere, in the form of carbon dioxide, methane, and other gases.

But, where did these gases come from?

Well, one hypothesis is that there was a rash of massive wildfires that unleashed tons of

CO2 that had been locked up in plants.

Another model proposes that giant seams of coal were exposed to the heat of volcanic

activity, which would have released the carbon from fossilized plants.

Or it could be that an otherwise mild warming event triggered the release of greenhouse

gases, by melting deposits of a compound known as methane hydrate.

Methane hydrate is similar to ice, but it contains molecules of methane trapped by molecules

of water.

And hydrates are usually stable, as long as they're under a lot of pressure, like deep

in the oceans, or if they're kept cold, like in permafrost -- the thick layer of frozen

soil that forms in cold climates.

But if these places warm up, the hydrates melt, releasing bursts of methane, which is

an even more potent greenhouse gas than CO2.

And of course, the more warming that happens, the more melting there is, which releases

even more greenhouses gases, creating a classic positive feedback loop.

Now, no matter how it started, it's worth noting that, during the PETM, carbon was released

into the atmosphere at only a fraction of the rate at which it's being emitted today.

One study of marine sediments from the Arctic showed that, at the peak of the PETM, as much

as 1.7 billion metric tons of carbon were released into the atmosphere every year, for

at least 4,000 years.

A similar study of sediments from New Jersey put the figure at about 1.1 billion tons of

carbon every year.

Now, compare that to the amount of carbon being released today.

In 2014 alone, it was 9.8 billion metric tons of carbon.

So, 56 million years ago, carbon was being released less quickly than it is now, but

those emissions continued for thousands of years.

And it was more than enough to create a potent greenhouse effect.

With more carbon in the atmosphere than plants could absorb, the planet started to change

rapidly.

In many places, the climate delivered a combination of humidity and heat that allowed vast rainforests

to flourish.

And among the animals that thrived in these warm forests were reptiles.

Fossils of alligators, crocodiles, and turtles can be found in nearly every fossil bed from

the PETM -- even in the polar forests of Canada and Greenland.

And these lush forests were also where many early mammal groups diversified -- including

our every own lineage, the primates.

In fact, the earliest true primates appear in the fossil record just as the PETM was

starting to take off, 56 million years ago.

They adapted quickly to a world covered in trees, developing things like forward-facing

eyes, fingernails instead of claws, and opposable thumbs.

These features gave primates such an edge, that by 53 million years ago, they could be

found across the northern hemisphere -- from tiny Eosimias in China

to Notharctus in Wyoming.

But in the oceans, life in hothouse Earth became much harder.

In fact, in some places it was almost impossible.

At the equator, ocean temperatures were unbearably hot, sometimes reaching as high as 36 degrees,

almost as hot as your average hot tub.

This was probably too hot for many kinds of plankton, which were -- and are -- the basis

for most ocean food webs.

But an even more devastating side effect of high CO2 levels was ocean acidification.

When ocean water absorbs CO2, it becomes more acidic.

And this in turn depletes the water's concentration of carbonates -- the compounds that many organisms

use to build shells and other structures.

And this is why one of the clearest effects of the thermal maximum can still be found

in core samples from the deep sea.

Sediments that date back to before the warming are typically pale in color, because they're

rich with the skeletons of deep sea foraminifera.

Also known as forams, these are tiny protozoans that build shells of calcium carbonate.

And where forams were abundant, the chalky fossils of their shells turned the ocean bed

white.

But when the oceans became more acidic, the sediments turned dark.

Because … most of the forams just disappeared.

During the PETM, between 30 and 50 percent of all foram species went extinct.

The same phenomenon also stunted the growth of hard corals, which need carbonates to build

their skeletons, too.

So, during the PETM and for millions of years afterward, big, complex coral reefs all but

disappeared from the fossil record.

All told, the thermal maximum was a mixed bag for life on Earth – proving to be an important

period for us mammals, but a major loss for some marine life.

And, like all dramatic events, the PETM did come to an end.

Although, we're not sure how, or why.

Over the course of the Eocene epoch, the climate slowly began to cool.

And although the temperature occasionally spiked again, it never reached the extremes

of the maximum.

Temperatures kept dropping during the Eocene -- so much so, in fact, that by the end of

the epoch, 34 million years ago, polar ice caps had begun to form.

But, how did we get from rainforests near the poles to ice caps?

Well, the cause of the initial cooling that actually stopped the PETM 53 million years

ago remains a mystery.

But something allowed that cooling to take hold, and make the world even colder.

And the answer here might have to do, again, with plants.

Arctic sediments that date back to the early Eocene -- 49 million years ago -- have been found

to contain huge swaths of fossilized aquatic ferns known as Azolla.

These plants thrived in the lush, warm Arctic.

But as the environment changed, they died off.

And as they dropped to the seafloor, the thinking goes, they took tons of carbon with them,

which caused temperatures to drop even further.

Despite how little we know about its end, or its beginning, the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal

Maximum shows us just how polarizing climate change can be for life on Earth.

For some organisms, like early primates, the warming was a chance to develop new forms

and spread to new locations.

But for corals, forams, and other marine life, such extreme heat spelled disaster.

It gives us, in the midst of our own period of warming, a view of how extreme the effects

of climate change can be.

And it allows us to make some pretty striking comparisons.

Remember when I said that, during the PETM, the globe warmed more than humans had seen

so far?

Well, keep in mind that, in recent years, the rate of annual carbon emissions have been

more than five times greater than they were at the peak of the PETM.

As a result, our world is warming faster than it did back in the Eocene.

Just over the past hundred years, the average global temperature has increased by about

0.7 degrees Celsius.

But that's just been over the past century.

During the PETM, it took perhaps thousands of years for temperatures to rise that much.

So the PETM is the closest we can get to understanding the effects of global warming today.

And it has a lot to teach us about the extremes that life experienced, on land and in the

seas.

Yes, rainforests full of primates and insects and reptiles is beautiful.

But I think you'll agree with me that most of us like them right where they are today.

PBS Digital Studios is sponsored by Curiosity Stream, where you can stream documentary films,

and programs about science, nature, and history, including exclusive originals!

For example, check out Rise of the Continents, a BBC series that uses geological clues to

recreate the supercontinent of Pangea.

Curiosity Stream offers unlimited streaming, and for you Eons viewers, the first two months

are free if you sign up at curiositystream.com/eons and use the promo code EONS.

Alright, we need your help

What do you want to know about the story of life on Earth?

Let us know in the comments.

And don't forget to go to youtube.com/eons and subscribe!

If you liked this episode, you could share it with

people who you think might also enjoy it

because, look, it's fascinating stuff

And now do yourself a favor and check out some of our sister channels from PBS Digital Studios.

Your brain will thank you!

For more infomation >> The Last Time the Globe Warmed - Duration: 10:54.

-------------------------------------------

WORLDS FASTEST QUICK SCOPE! - Fortnite Funny Fails and WTF Moments #18 (Fortnite Funny Moments) - Duration: 10:38.

Fortnite Funny Fails and WTF Moments #18 (Daily Fortnite Funny Moments)

For more infomation >> WORLDS FASTEST QUICK SCOPE! - Fortnite Funny Fails and WTF Moments #18 (Fortnite Funny Moments) - Duration: 10:38.

-------------------------------------------

Use This Unique Jig Trailer To Get Big Bites This Fall! - Duration: 2:56.

what's up guys Ben Milliken here back for mystery tackle box and today we're

going to be talking about how you can use this net bait baby mad packer that

came in your mystery tackle box as a jig trailer to beef up that presentation and

get some of the biggest bites of the season you know now that we're getting

deeper into the fall these fish's metabolisms are slowing down

substantially they're looking for a lot easier bigger meals that they can pick

off spend a lot less energy and get a big piece of protein at the same time

and so one thing I love to do during these fall months later in the year is

to beef up your presentation whenever you're fishing a football jig

so why would anyone want to use this long slender flapping profile trailer on

the back of this perfect craw imitating football jig well I got a couple reasons

for that just you got to hear me out on this two times the year I really like to

lengthen the profile and really bulk up the profile of my football jig that's in

the post spawn period when they really get on that ten inch worm creature bait

bite and definitely this time of year as well well into the fall we're way past

the the shad migration everything we're now into November when those fish are

really getting isolated on some of those deeper breaks deeper rock piles and

stuff and their metabolisms slowed down a ton so these fish are lethargic they

don't want to move a bunch to eat a bait and so when they eat a bait they want it

to be something that's bigger bulkier longer and this guy right here looks

bigger it just flat-out looks bigger than a three or four inch cross a

l'heure it can get you some more bites and it can definitely get you some of

the biggest bites of the season you know net bait plastics have caught a ton of

fish for me over the years and this guy looks like a winner I hear as well some

of the things I like about this baby mad packet out of the box that comes with

these two big craw flapping arms that I made the pack across so successful for

me throughout the years and then it's got these arms up here these appendages

up at the top of the bait which have a ton of flap as well and of course these

two long twister tails at the bottom so this guy is a smaller four and a half

inch package for a creature bait but being for that small size that has a ton

of action which not only is going to be great for a jig trailer

well it's a great pitching bait great Carolina rig bait as well although it

may seem a little bit off the wall and out of the norm go thread this baby mad

pack up creature bait on the back of a football jig later this fall and I can

almost promise you you're gonna have a chance at some of the biggest fish of

the season it's all I got for you today guys thank you so much for taking the

time to watch and of course head on over to mystery tackle box comm to check out

some of these awesome products

For more infomation >> Use This Unique Jig Trailer To Get Big Bites This Fall! - Duration: 2:56.

-------------------------------------------

Why You See Monsters in the Mirror - Duration: 5:46.

[INTRO ♪]

Mirrors can be pretty freaking creepy.

Don't believe it?

Go into the bathroom, turn off the lights,

and stare at yourself in the mirror.

Give it a minute or two … and you'll start to see things.

Strange things.

That's what puts Bloody Mary right up there with Seven Minutes in Heaven

and Truth or Dare on the list of best old-school slumber party games.

In the 80s movie version, you say Bloody Mary's name three times

and summon a terrifying demoness in the mirror—

which, I'm doing just fine without those particular nightmares,

thank you very much.

It's weird that looking at your reflection for too long

makes you see a face in the mirror that's distorted and definitely not yours.

That's literally the opposite of what mirrors are for.

But even though it's a little freaky,

it can tell us a lot about how our brains process images, especially faces.

In 2010, an Italian researcher asked fifty people to look into a mirror

for ten minutes in a dimly lit room and write down everything they saw.

Two-thirds of them saw a distorted version of their own face.

Over a quarter saw someone that they'd never met before,

or what looked like an old woman or a child.

And I'm literally getting goosebumps; this is freaking me out.

Almost half reported seeing quote-unquote

"fantastical and monstrous beings."

Some of this weirdness can be explained by the Troxler effect—

where things in your peripheral vision start to fade

as you focus on something in the middle.

That's because the neurons in your eyes, like other sensing neurons,

stop reacting when they get the same stimulus over and over and over again.

It's kind of like how you get used to smells,

or stop feeling your shirt on your skin when you're sitting still

or have no idea that these glasses are always on your face

even though they're always there.

But you don't just see holes—

your brain tries to fill in gaps in your visual field

by blending with the surrounding scenery.

So staring into your reflection's eyes

can make your chin, ears, and forehead fade, Cheshire Cat-style.

But the Troxler effect alone doesn't explain why you see other people in the mirror.

Psychologists think that may have more to do with the way we perceive faces.

Studies like the Thatcher illusion,

where researchers flipped the the eyes and mouth

on a picture of Margaret Thatcher upside-down to create a horrifying monster,

show that we process the image of a face as a gestalt:

a whole that's greater than the sum of its parts.

So when certain features that you know are supposed to be part of a face

are wrong or disappear, you start to have trouble processing them.

Some researchers think that's what's happening

when you stare in the mirror for too long.

The Troxler effect causes distortion and fading,

which disrupts the assembly of various facial features

into a gestalt—therefore making the face

feel more like it belongs to someone, or something, else.

All 50 participants in the 2010 study

reported feeling some amount of dissociation from their reflection.

The way they felt about the things they saw in the mirror

depended on what they saw—

those that saw a terrible monster were understandably more freaked out

than those that saw a rando smiling at them.

But they all had the sense that the face in the mirror

belonged to an "other"—

a sign that high-level facial processing was being disrupted.

Not recognizing your reflection might not seem like that big of a deal,

but there's a good reason it freaks people out:

the ability to recognize yourself in a mirror

is strongly linked to your development of a sense of self.

It's something few species can do,

and even we humans can't do it until we're about 20 months old.

Recognizing your own reflection isn't the only indicator of self-awareness,

but it's a pretty important one.

Researchers think it's part of a series of milestones

that lead to developing your sense of self,

as well as the understanding that other people

have their own beliefs and desires.

So looking in the mirror and seeing a face that's not your own

might be more than just creepy.

It might actually cause a bit of an identity crisis for a second there.

What psychologists can't explain is why we see monsters.

Weird, creepy, Bloody Marys?

Sure.

But these ideas don't fully explain why we see non-human faces.

It's one of those psychological mysteries that, when solved,

could teach us a lot more about how our brains work.

So if you're getting chills looking at your reflection,

just turn on the lights and maybe don't look quite

so long at yourself in the mirror.

It's not actually a monster.

Pinky swear.

Alright, SciShow Psych viewers, I got an EXCITING ANNOUNCEMENT for you!

Some of the SciShow team and I were talking about a problem that we often have.

People will ask us, "what do you want for Christmas or your birthday?"

and then we feel kind of bad for not having a good answer to that question.

But then I was thinking, there are some things that I've gotten for myself

or that I want or that people have gotten for me that I really love!

Because it's symbolic of my love of the world,

or lets me do experiments on myself or it lets me learn more about things!

So we have put together a collection of artifacts of this universe …

we got a limited number of each of these things,

and we have put them up at a store called SciShow Finds.

These SciShow Finds are curated by me,

they are things that I would love to get in my stocking.

We're going to continue adding new finds as we find them throughout the year,

and the new ones will replace these old ones,

so all of these products are only around for a limited time.

You're bound to have friends or family who would love these Mars Socks,

trilobite fossils, or this Space Shuttle lapel pin.

And, if not, maybe you want to get them for yourself

or just shoot that link over to anyone who asks you what you want

for Christmas and say, "You know, anything from this site

would be really cool.

Mom was probably going to get you socks anyway,

now she's gonna get you some socks you're really gonna like.

And know that when you buy from SciShowFinds.com,

or you send that link to somebody, you're also supporting SciShow.

So, thanks for doing that.

And thanks for watching because that's another way to support us.

[OUTRO ♪]

For more infomation >> Why You See Monsters in the Mirror - Duration: 5:46.

-------------------------------------------

Welcome to Queen's School of Computing - Duration: 3:05.

My name is Hossam Hassanein, the director of the school since July, 2017.

The Queen's School of Computing has a set of unique interdisciplinary programs like no other.

Our outstanding professors are internationally recognized

and are dedicated educators that are going to give you

all the practical information you need to succeed in the industry

and all the theoretical foundations of computer science.

I think my favourite thing about Queen's Computing is the amount of related extracurriculars that we're able to participate in.

There's also clubs on campus that kind of relate it to software and trying to improve ourselves as developers.

My favourite thing is probably Orientation Week.

It was just a lot of fun

especially as a frosh,

but being a tech which is being orientation leader in your second year was probably the best experience for me.

My favourite thing is the variety of people you'll find in our program.

There's everything from musicians to artists to athletes to people who just like computing.

My favourite thing about Queen's Computing is the kind of like general first year and also

The fact that there's so many different courses you can choose from even if they're not specific to your stream.

So where do you turn to if you need help?

You can talk to any of your professors, to me, to the Undergraduate Assistant

Also, there are so many resources at Arts and Science and Queen's to help students throughout their degree.

On behalf of myself, the faculty, the staff, and the student body, welcome to the School of Computing.

For more infomation >> Welcome to Queen's School of Computing - Duration: 3:05.

-------------------------------------------

Suspects in Gardens Mall scare in court - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> Suspects in Gardens Mall scare in court - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

FLYING 4000 MILES to MEET MY CLAN MATE! (emotional) - Duration: 7:12.

FLYING 4000 MILES to MEET MY CLAN MATE! (emotional)

For more infomation >> FLYING 4000 MILES to MEET MY CLAN MATE! (emotional) - Duration: 7:12.

-------------------------------------------

NASA Silicon Valley Podcast - Episode 70 - Sylvain Costes - Duration: 30:44.

Matthew Buffington: You're listening to NASA in Silicon Valley, episode 70, and for

the intro I have Abby with me here again.

Abby Tabor (Host): Hello, hello!

Matthew Buffington: This is a slightly interesting episode just for the sake that when we planned

to recording this, I got horrifically ill, and Abby jumped in at the last minute to go

ahead and do this recording.

Host: That's right.

Matthew Buffington: So Abby, tell us about the conversation that you had.

Host: Alright, well, it turned out to be very interesting!

I met with Sylvain Costes.

He is the manager of the GeneLab project, here at Ames.

So you know how NASA does a lot of biosciences.

We do biology experiments up on the space station.

So when those experiments end, the science doesn't end because all that data goes into

a repository, which is open to the public, it's open access, for any researchers to

use.

And right now they're developing tools, and really building a system around it, where

people can come analyze this space biology data that NASA helped produce, and looking

for discoveries that they can make within it themselves.

Matthew Buffington: Oh wow!

Host: And this is for researchers, if that's your research, or for citizen scientists who

may be interested, they'll be able to explore as well, and getting more out of the data

than ever.

What Sylvain describes it as is NASA as the custodian of knowledge about how life is effected

in space.

Matthew Buffington: Sounds super exciting!

So before jump on into it, a reminder for folks listening, we have a phone number, (650)

604-1400.

Give us a call and leave a message, and we'll try to add that into future episodes.

If you want to be digital, we are on all the social media platforms, we're using the

hashtag #NASASiliconValley.

We are a NASA podcast, but we are not the only NASA podcast!

I'll give a quick little shout out to some of our friends over at headquarters, who do

Gravity Assist.

There's also another weekly podcast called This Week at NASA.

And then of course, our friends over in JSC, over at the Johnson Space Center, they have

Houston, We Have a Podcast.

But for today…

Host: … Let's listen to Sylvain Costes.

[Music]

Host: Hey, Sylvain, thanks for coming in.

Sylvain Costes: Thank you for having me.

Host: I'm excited to hear about your work a little bit.

Usually we start this off by learning about you and your background and how did you end

up at NASA.

Where do you come from originally?

Sylvain Costes: Sure.

I was born in France.

I went through physics and mathematics training in France in college.

Host: Cool.

Sylvain Costes: Eventually I transferred to -- I did an exchange at Texas A&M University.

From there, I liked the American education.

Host: Yeah?

Sylvain Costes: So I decided to go for a PhD.

After a Masters at Texas A&M, I did a PhD at UC Berkeley and spent some time at NCI

National Cancer Institute, and then became an independent investigator at Lawrence Berkeley

National Lab, which is a DOE lab.

I joined NASA only last December in 2016.

Host: So you're pretty new.

You're even newer than I am to NASA.

Interesting.

Sylvain Costes: Good.

Host: And I lived in Paris for eight years, so we have something else in common.

Sylvain Costes: Yeah.

[Foreign language].

Host: No, no, no.

[Foreign language].

Let's continue in English.

From France, what part of France?

Sylvain Costes: It's hard to tell.

I was born in Bourges, which is one of the center cities.

But I moved, I think, 20 times.

By the age of 20, I had moved 20 times in France.

Host: Oh my gosh.

Sylvain Costes: I don't have any really -- City, I would say I'm from the south.

That's really where my family is from.

So Toulouse would be --

Host: I see.

Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: The real city is called Rodez, but I don't really feel like I'm --

Host: But everyone knows Toulouse.

Sylvain Costes: Yeah, I'm just French in general.

Host: Right, okay.

Sylvain Costes: I've been everywhere in France.

Host: So you're used to moving around, it sounds like.

Sylvain Costes: That's right.

Host: From France to Texas to California, you've been all over.

Sylvain Costes: Yeah.

Host: Eventually that led you to NASA.

So you're a biologist, is that right?

Sylvain Costes: No, I'm a physicist.

Host: A physicist.

Sorry.

Sylvain Costes: My PhD is in nuclear engineering.

Host: Oh my gosh.

Sylvain Costes: I used to do -- In my Masters, I was doing nuclear reactor design, so a lot

of neutronics.

And then in nuclear engineering, there is a section called health physics, which is

understanding how radiation impacts people as life; so like how you can get cancer from

radiation, the risk of ionizing radiation.

And so I got into this.

And part of that is called medical physics, which is understanding how radiation can be

used to treat cancer

Host: That's the connection between physics and cancer reduction.

Sylvain Costes: That's right.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: And then little by little, I left the physics world to move more and

more towards biology.

Being a physicist, I've done a lot of -- I've used a lot of the physics knowledge, so mathematics

and modeling, into understanding biological processes.

Until last year, very much focused on radiation.

And so the connection with NASA there was that there is cosmic radiation that astronauts

get exposed to.

So I've been studying their impact on humans for a long time.

Host: Right.

Radiation is a big challenge for space exploration.

Sylvain Costes: It's a big one.

Microgravity and radiation are the two big ones.

Right?

Host: Right.

Sylvain Costes: Now at GeneLab, I'm really emphasizing everything.

Radiation is just one small aspect of what we're working on.

We're really looking at the full response of the human, and life in general, in terms

of living in space.

Host: Right.

Sylvain Costes: So microgravity.

Host: The physical effects of the space environment.

Right?

Sylvain Costes: That's right.

Host: Right, okay.

So you just mentioned GeneLab.

What is that?

Sylvain Costes: I'm the Project Manager now for GeneLab.

And so let me tell you a bit about GeneLab, because it's a project that started about

four years ago, roughly.

The idea, which is I think very good, is that NASA should be the custodian of the knowledge

of how life gets impacted in space.

And so, there are a lot of studies that have been going on for 20, 30 years under the sponsorship

of NASA.

Host: Definitely.

We've got a big biosciences division here.

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

And so, there's a lot of scattered information here and there.

I think we're lucky to live in a time where now we have this new technology called omics.

And so the omics are -- They're trying to interpret the slight different changes in

your gene sequencing with respect to some risk to your health.

That's one omics that's exploding right now in the world.

But there's other omics that have been going on for a while, one of them is called transcriptomic,

which is 90 percent of the data in GeneLab are transcriptomic data.

There it's the idea of looking at the RNA expression in tissues or in microbes or in

anything we're looking at, any sample coming from the space station or from the space shuttle

if they have been analyzed for omics data up into our repository.

So GeneLab is that big repository of information.

Host: Okay, right.

GeneLab is a database.

Sylvain Costes: It's a database, but it's going to be more than a database.

This was the original thought for it.

Basically, let's store all this information to one local place.

And so, we've been very active in either identifying legacy dataset that should be in GeneLab from

the get go from the past.

We're also very active with any new omics being produced on the ISS, to make sure that

those data comes into our repository.

We're not only looking at one type of omics.

We're looking at many different omics.

There's something else called proteomics, which is protein profile, epigenetic, which

is how your DNA gets decorated by specific molecules that changes the expression profile

of those molecules.

All these omics techniques are coming to us, and we're working very actively in identifying

what's been already produced in the world.

The idea is to become like the custodian of knowledge and catering this information to

the public.

Host: Okay, cool.

Let's review.

Omics is this big area that it could be proteomics, genomics?

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

Host: Right, okay.

So any of these companies that are offering genetic analyses for the public.

Sylvain Costes: It's one type of omics.

Host: Yeah, that's one type of omics.

All of these basically are ways to study what our DNA is producing or what any organisms,

cells, are doing with their DNA.

Is it correct that that's what can be influenced by the space environment?

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

I think if you go back about life in space, there's really two big questions that we need

to address.

One is really how microgravity confinement, ionizing radiation can affect living entities.

Here, that question is important with respect to the astronauts, because we want to make

sure they're going to be healthy in the long run.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: So that's one big question.

We believe that in addition to the battery of tests you can do on an astronaut like blood

samples, pulse, EKG, whatever, you have other tools, molecular tools, that we can address

by using animal models.

Because the problem with omics is typically you have to sacrifice the animal to get the

information.

Host: I see.

Sylvain Costes: For a mouse, we're going to get the liver, we're going to get the brain,

we're going to get the bones, and we can then run omics on those guys.

Host: Okay.

So to see what impact microgravity or radiation is having on the body?

Sylvain Costes: On a body that is close to us.

Mammals are great, but there's also effort on drosophila, which is insect.

Host: The fruit flies.

Sylvain Costes: Fruit flies.

You also have C. elegans.

So there's a variety of animal models we can use.

There is another question that GeneLab is also helping answering in terms of the information

we're putting into the database.

It's more understanding the way an ecosystem is modified by space.

And so, here you can imagine microbes.

We talk about microbes being found on the walls of the space station.

Host: Yeah, I've seen that.

Sylvain Costes: These kinds of things would be addressable with omics, but you're more

interesting in seeing what kind of maybe new species or how a strain can deviate from its

original genomic makeup by being in space for a long period of time.

It's also helpful for the client, for instance, understanding the kind of stress you put on

an ecosystem, like plants.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: Then you may be able to optimize how a plant grows on Mars or in the space

station.

You see, you can either look at the ecosystem side or you can look at the human health side.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: And so, those two things are coming together in GeneLab which is interesting.

Host: That's very interesting.

That's what I had just realized as you were talking; you can look at the effect of space

on an individual, and then all the way up to the ecosystem scale.

Sylvain Costes: Exactly.

Host: That's pretty awesome.

Sylvain Costes: Right.

Host: Okay, so these studies are going on already.

And then GeneLab collects all that data that these experiments are producing, is that it?

Sylvain Costes: Yeah, so there's different ways that I can make their way in GeneLab.

One thing, as I mentioned earlier, was we talk about legacy data.

Before GeneLab existed, people were already gathering some omics.

Having said that, the omics have changed a lot over the past 10 years.

So the legacy data typically have some kind of technology for transcriptomics that we

don't use as much anymore.

Like we could microwave, which is the old way of looking at RNA labels, gene expression

labels.

Since then, now we have RNA sequencing, which is a better technique.

As we go to new omics, we have much larger datasets.

So the repository is getting bigger as the big data is coming down the pipe.

Host: Yeah, totally.

Sylvain Costes: That's one way.

But the other aspect of GeneLab is to really work actively with investigators and collaborators

to generate new data.

And so we work with PI to have their funding from NASA to fly animal models, plant, microbes,

in the space station.

And we help them maybe get more information from their samples and make sure that all

their omics go in the database at the end.

Host: This is the side that I know a little bit about from working at Ames.

Our bioscience department, they work with researchers at other institutions.

Right?

Sylvain Costes: Right.

Host: Who want to fly an experiment to space to do their science.

That's what you're talking about.

Right?

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

Host: We'll help them carry out that experiment, and then also we get to use the data.

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

There is that aspect of NASA Ames where an investigator will work with a principal investigator

that got funding to actually fly on the ISS specific mission and specific experiment.

Part of our work is also there.

I think there's something new about GeneLab that as the new project manager I'm trying

to push for is I really think that GeneLab should be serving three different communities.

The data repository by itself, that data really talks to the specialists, the bioinformatician

that can go in there and download the data, work with the data, and interpret the data.

Host: Specialists, yeah.

Sylvain Costes: Very, very specialized people.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: Scientists.

But then you have another group which is the scientists in general, which they don't know

how to do the bioinformatics, but they know how to ask the right question.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: And so, we want to provide tools for them to be able to access the information

without having to do all these very tedious and slow work.

Some of the repository data are now being used to be processed to generate a new level

of data that we would call higher order data that can be interpreted.

From there, for instance, the idea would be is there a signature of cancer in some liver

samples that I got from the space station.

A specialist on cancer, but not a specialist in bioinformatics, can ask this question by

being provided the right information.

Host: I see.

Also, that means they're not doing a brand new experiment.

They're using data that exists.

Sylvain Costes: Exactly.

Host: Cool.

Sylvain Costes: And so now you can think of this -- It's the same data, but they've already

been preprocessed by us, and then they are now -- There's a bigger emphasis on tools

to visualize this information.

And so, we're still working with this with an investigator.

The idea would be to really have, at the end, even a higher-level type of information that

would be very succinct but very simple to access.

With a few clicks, someone could go in there and ask for their favorite gene.

So is P53 modify in space.

And then you could ask to look at all the mouse data, or you could say, "Okay, I want

mouse and drosophila."

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: This now talks to not only scientists, but really even high school students

can do these kind of questions.

Host: Really?

Sylvain Costes: Yeah, we had a GeneLab for high school.

Liz Blaber was the PI who actually organized this.

It was very successful.

Host: Awesome.

Sylvain Costes: High school students can make sense out of this data with the right guidance,

so it's possible.

Host: Wow, that's impressive.

That's bioinformatics.

You're saying high school students are working on that.

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely, yeah.

It's really amazing.

The new generation is well trained.

Host: Wow, yeah.

NASA is getting the next generation ready.

That's awesome.

Sylvain Costes: Yeah.

There were like, what, 20-plus kids that came here this summer and they spent 3 weeks.

Host: Wow.

Sylvain Costes: They worked on the data that was on the database.

At the end, they did a presentation and it was really good.

Host: That's a good way to spend your summer as a high school student.

Sylvain Costes: I agree.

Host: Not just hanging out at the beach.

Right?

You said three communities that GeneLab serves.

Did we hit all three?

Sylvain Costes: Yeah.

Those visualization aspects is really -- you could have a visualization layer that would

be fairly sophisticated for still scientist type of people.

But then you could really have even a higher-level visualization that is really simple where

you can ask very simple questions.

Anyone who doesn't know science but was curious about space could say, "Is there any change

in inflammatory response in space?"

Host: Okay.

Sylvain Costes: And so at least on the omics level, looking at protein and RNA, you could

extract this kind of information, actually, and report this information back to the public.

What we're envisioning is really this multitier level where you can really, for a specialist,

you would probably much play with the data the way they are.

For the scientist community, you would have visualization tools and some processing tools

if you want to do some grinding yourself.

Host: Okay.

Crunch the numbers and that data.

Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: The system would be, by the way, on the cloud.

But then at the end, the very light level data, which doesn't take much room, is those

visualization data.

But then they're very much guided by us, because we have to make choices in what we want to

display.

Host: Right, right.

Sylvain Costes: To do this, we think that we will involve the scientific community through

something – NIH [National Institutes of Health] uses a similar model called AWG, analysis

working group.

The idea is to put together multiple principal investigator experts in one topic and put

them together to tease out what will be the best way to analyze some type of data.

For instance, we could focus on the rodent data or you could focus on the microbe data.

You could imagine different AWG, analysis working groups, for these different questions.

Host: Okay, so different groups of scientists will decide this particular kind of data is

probably most useful for the community, so we're going to create some tools to process

it?

Sylvain Costes: Some tools or some way of displaying them.

Host: Okay.

Sylvain Costes: How can you make it very, very easy for anyone to understand what's

going on.

What is the right processing pipeline?

We call them pipelines.

It's like a bunch of different scripts that you put together that will take the raw data,

which are very big, and turn them into a very small amount of data that is small but very

meaningful to us.

You can imagine, Google does the same thing with their data.

They have all these very large databases that they work with.

But at the end, when you type a keyword for a specific question you're asking, the system

is able to point immediately to a webpage with an actual answer to your question, which

is remarkable.

In the background there's a lot of things happening for this, and there's that huge

database working for you.

Host: Are you creating the search engine that will browse this huge database of biological

information?

Sylvain Costes: We're thinking of that.

It's a bit more difficult for us because when you think of Google, they really have what

they call big data, which is a lot of data.

GeneLab doesn't have big data.

We have complex data.

Host: Okay.

Sylvain Costes: We don't have that many experiments from space mission.

If you go on our website right now, you will find 130-plus studies, and less than half

of them are actually space missions, and the other ones are ground studies that mimic what's

happening in space.

Host: Okay.

Simulations?

Sylvain Costes: Simulation.

This is the caveat is that we have lots of data, but they are complex data and they're

not big data.

We have very sparse metrics of information.

And so, there's still some question about how you're going to go about those data.

And so, that's really where working with the scientific community will help us figure out

what are the best pipelines with these specific constraints in mind, which is an additional

challenge.

But I think the technology and I think machine learning may be helpful there.

Host: Really?

Machine learning is part of this?

Sylvain Costes: We're thinking of that, too.

Host: Interesting.

Sylvain Costes: Because there might be some clever way of interpreting those sparse metrics

that we're dealing with.

There are a lot of things still that are undefined in the scientific community.

I think GeneLab is really at the cutting edge of this information.

It's super exciting, but it's a challenge.

I think it's a visionary approach to have created GeneLab.

But any visionary approach also brings a lot of challenges that needs to be dealt with.

Host: Yeah, but NASA is all about challenges and taking them on.

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

That's why we're here. Right?

Host: Right.

Exactly.

I wanted to ask you.

You've spoken about how GeneLab will be accessible to different levels of expertise.

Is it also open to anyone to go browse and look at?

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

The intent is to have these different tier levels.

Currently the current version we have is 1.0, and we're moving to 2.0.

1.0 is very much a repository where you can just download the data.

The version 2.0 would have -- And it's public, sorry.

Anyone can go in there.

There is no restriction.

Host: Amazing.

Sylvain Costes: A high school student can download the data on his or her hard drive

and play with them if they want to.

There are a lot of free tools out there that you can do that, really.

But 2.0 is going to have more interesting things coming down the pipe.

We have now a workspace so people can log in and actually see all your data that you

want to add to the current GeneLab data.

You can bring your own data.

If you want to do a comparison, for instance, with your favorite experiment and some space

samples, you can do it inside the system.

The other thing is 2.0, as we move on, we'll be having move and more tools that you can

use to process some samples and do some analysis.

Host: Does that mean like a cancer researcher could take their own data from their own lab

and compare, I don't know, genetic changes to what we see in space?

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

That's exactly the idea.

You could have someone who's a specialist in breast cancer.

We know for instance breast is a very sensitive tissue for radiation.

It's a classic model.

It would not be a bad idea to look at the -- A lot of the animals that were flown on

the ISS and in the space shuttle are female mice.

For many reasons, it's easier to work with female than male.

Typically males tend to fight in the same cage, for a start.

So we can't put as many males as we can put female in a cage.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: And so, the female have the mammary gland, which is another very interesting

tissue because they're very sensitive to radiation.

You could look at cancer incidents through radiation.

It would be an interesting question to look at specific early onset of cancer, a signature

at the genomic level, and then compare it to the space station data that's on GeneLab,

for instance.

I don't think anyone has done that yet.

Host: Interesting.

All right, and GeneLab would make that comparison possible.

Sylvain Costes: Should be, if we have -- Having said that, we need to first have some mammary

gland data in GeneLab for ISS or space shuttle.

They might be out there somewhere.

A lot of the data are being generated by the PI as we're talking.

So there's more that are going to come along.

Hopefully some of this information will be there as we -- The longer we wait, the more

information that will be there.

Host: Right, that's going to grow with time.

Sylvain Costes: Exactly.

Host: Yeah, cool.

So do you guys just receive data, or do you ever work with the samples that come back

from the space station?

Because there are biological experiments happening up there.

Right?

Sylvain Costes: It's a great question.

Actually we do both.

The majority of the work is obviously on taking other people's data.

But NASA has recognized that some samples may not be taken by any PI, and so it would

be a bit of a waste.

Host: They may not be used by -- ?

Sylvain Costes: Right.

And so GeneLab has come up with a prioritization of samples that we think are very important.

One of the strategies would be that if we can really focus our attention to specific

tissue on a regular basis, then we'll have a very clear characterization of this tissue.

As time goes by, we'll have multiple time points in space.

So a long duration versus a short duration, looking always at a same tissue in the same

type of animals, then we'll be able to see how the time dependencies are showing up.

To do this, we have what we call the sample processing lab, which is a small group in

GeneLab that either work with other principal investigators when they need help to process

samples.

But also there's something called tissue sharing agreement where we can get some tissue from

the ISS that are not clamed by anyone else.

There's a list of tissue that we'd rather see coming in through this prioritization.

Host: What would be an example?

What would be tissues you're interested in?

Sylvain Costes: The one we've been looking at a lot is liver.

The reason no one wanted to look at liver is because it's not a tissue that's been showing

very much response.

Having said that, we actually now have a publication being prepared on that topic showing that

actually there is some real changes in the liver in space.

Host: Really?

Sylvain Costes: Which is surprising.

There was one study before that had suggested there was a change in a longer duration from

space shuttle samples.

And now the study we're preparing actually is showing that on the ISS as well, the same

strain of mice called C57 are showing some kind of a change in the liver over a 30-day

course in space.

Host: That could be important for human astronauts.

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

The big question is -- The problem with animal system is that you have to remember that we

work with one strain, which means that all the data is coming from one single strain,

which is the equivalent of -- When you work on one strain of mice, you're looking at identical

twins, if you want.

Host: Yeah.

Right.

Sylvain Costes: So you have no idea of how genetic variance is affecting this response.

Host: Okay.

Sylvain Costes: What you see in one strand may not be seen in another strand.

Host: Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: And so that's one of the big challenges with the animal work.

Host: I see.

Sylvain Costes: That's a caveat, and that's why insects are pretty cool, because with

insects you can actually have a bunch of different genetic backgrounds in one experiment.

Host: More easily, more of them.

They're smaller.

Sylvain Costes: That's right.

So you see, this is the art of science.

It's like how do you use each model to their best -- Are you optimizing the usage of these

animals?

Host: Yeah, put them to their best use.

Yeah.

Sylvain Costes: Right.

Rodents are great because they're very close to us genetically, but that's the limitation.

Insects are great because like Drosophila, you can have a huge spectrum of genetic differences

and you can have many of them, but then they're much further away from us than a mammal.

Host: Yeah.

Right.

Sylvain Costes: And then we put all this information together.

The idea, again, as we move forward with technology, we expect to see some new algorithm that will

be able to make these bridges between the different species and come up with some real

response from space and understand better how space affects us.

Host: Yeah. Right. Okay.

So take the results from those studies happening in space, look at the data in a broad way

and draw conclusions?

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

Host: Okay.

That's super interesting.

Sylvain Costes: It is. Right?

Host: Yeah, cool.

Sylvain Costes: 10 years from now, we can go back and see what we discover.

But I think there's going to be a lot of discovery by the scientific community through this database.

Host: Yeah, no doubt.

The other thing I love about the space station biology experiments is it's not just for space

applications.

But everything we learn about human health from that can be applied down here potentially.

Sylvain Costes: Absolutely.

That's a great point, thanks for raising it.

Because we're discovering this as we -- One of the things we're doing right now at GeneLab

is as we are generating those preprocess file for opening the door to a bigger community

that don't need to do all this processing that we can provide to them, we're discovering

some confronting factors in the sample.

For instance, if you modify the carbon dioxide level in the cage of an animal -- I don't

know if you know that, but carbon dioxide levels are different in space because it tends

to be higher.

Host: Really?

Sylvain Costes: For the longest time, we thought that there was no impact because they were

still pretty low level.

Now with the GeneLab data, what we're discovering is that when you do a ground control and you

increase the carbon dioxide to the level that you have in space on the space station, we

do see some [unintelligible] natures in the gene.

Host: It has an impact then.

Sylvain Costes: It has an impact.

Now again, you have to be careful.

RNA level is just one very small piece of the puzzle.

You may have a change at the RNA level but not at the protein level, which is what's

more relevant, I would say, physiologically.

It's like the final signal is turning to an actual protein.

There are caveats in everything we do.

But it's really telling us that, yeah, those carbon dioxide have an impact.

It's not maybe picked up -- Physiological changes are maybe not picked up by it.

Host: Okay, yeah.

Sylvain Costes: But those very sensitive molecular tools can pick up those features.

Host: Right.

So that's an example where GeneLab is allowing you to discover that it's very complex, the

interactions between environment and DNA and proteins produced.

Sylvain Costes: Exactly.

Host: And you're teasing that apart.

Right?

Sylvain Costes: Right.

Because back to the carbon dioxide example.

You could imagine a situation on earth where we are exposed to a high level of carbon dioxide.

No one would ever study this stuff because no one would ever think of that.

But it turns out that [this] is clearly putting their fingers on one thing that maybe suggesting

more and more studies even by other investigators.

What are those signatures?

What are those changes in the RNA will do on the long term?

Is there a situation on earth where you get a low carbon dioxide level and they should

be concerned about it?

It is really going much more beyond space.

People being bedridden for like a month is the equivalent of being in microgravity [as]

one of the classic models.

Microgravity can tell us about bone loss and things like this.

Host: That's right.

Sylvain Costes: There are a lot of parallels between what's happening in space.

You can think of space as an accelerator of aging, in a way.

That's the way I look at it often.

And so I think everything we're discovering on those data will be relevant for humans

on earth as well.

Host: Fascinating.

I like the way earlier you described NASA as the custodian of data about biology and

physiology and health in space.

It sounds like you're making that easier to use and accessible to more people.

Sylvain Costes: That's what we're trying to do.

Host: Wonderful.

Excellent.

This was super fascinating.

I think for a lot of people it's surprising, first of all, that NASA does biology, and

then that they can take a look at this data and maybe use it themselves in their labs

or at home.

So thank you for sharing that with us.

Sylvain Costes: No, thank you for highlighting GeneLab.

Anyone who is listening, feel free to come to genelab.nasa.gov.

Host: Awesome.

Also online, we are @NASAAmes.

We can take any questions for Sylvain about GeneLab with the hashtag #NASASiliconValley.

Thanks again for being here.

Sylvain Costes: Thank you very much.

For more infomation >> NASA Silicon Valley Podcast - Episode 70 - Sylvain Costes - Duration: 30:44.

-------------------------------------------

Top 3: Best Pages to Download Music and Youtube Videos 2017 | Explained | Without Programs - Duration: 7:14.

For more infomation >> Top 3: Best Pages to Download Music and Youtube Videos 2017 | Explained | Without Programs - Duration: 7:14.

-------------------------------------------

Is it Too Late for Me? - Duration: 1:50.

So, this chastity thing sounds great, but is it too late for me

if I've already had sex or bought into the lies of the culture.

Chastity is not for perfect people.

And it's not even just for virgins.

Chastity is for everyone.

If chastity were for perfect people, I wouldn't be here today.

But the virtue of chastity is always about today.

The decision and choice I make in this very moment.

There was this story once, it's in scripture.

It's about a woman who was caught in an act of adultery.

These people, they caught her and they dragged her out into the middle of the town

and Jesus was there.

And these people asked Jesus, what should we do with this woman?

And Jesus, he looks at this woman, and he looks at all of these people in the crowd,

and he says, "Let the man without sin be the one to cast the first stone."

So all these people, they just start dropping their stones and walking away.

And Jesus, he looks at this woman, and he says something very profound.

He says, "They do not condemn you, and neither do I.

Go and sin no more."

And there are two things in this story that Jesus does that I love.

The first is that he completely forgives her of everything she's ever done in her whole life.

And the second thing he does is he challenges her to live differently.

He says, "Go and sin no more."

Because your sin doesn't define you.

Your weaknesses don't define you.

Your failings don't define who you are.

Chastity is about this present moment and looks towards the future with a lot of hope.

Don't be weighed down by your past, by your sins.

It's never too late to start over, and it's never too late to choose the virtue of chastity.

For more infomation >> Is it Too Late for Me? - Duration: 1:50.

-------------------------------------------

Gaming YouTubers NEWS OVERVIEW #2 (20.Nov.2017 - 03.Dec.2017) - Duration: 4:17.

Two weeks are up, so it's time for the second

edition of my Gaming YouTubers News Overview!

I'm humaldo and I'll give you a quick overview

of what was going on with my favorite Gaming

YouTubers in the last 14 days!

Let's start with SpawnWave, who provided us

with daily news from the gaming industry,

as usual. To go into all the news in detail

would go beyond the scope of this video, visiting

his channel on a daily basis is a must for every gamer anyway.

Apart from the daily news

coverage, he did an Axiom Verge Unboxing for

the Nintendo Switch and we learn that you

can already hack the Playstation 3 quite easily.

Mr. SpawnWave - Does anyone know his real

name? - is also concerned about the possible

Ataribox controller and he deals with the

D-Pads of the Switch Joycon and the Switch Pro controller.

He also plays Gear Club Unlimited,

Mantis Burn Racing, Worms W. M. D, Portal Knights,

The Nine Parchments Demo, and Resident

Evil Revelations 1 & 2. Nice job, as always.

This time I actually wanted to also include

Jim Sterling in my report, but his output

is simply too high to go into it separately here.

He has published 17 videos in the last

14 days, focusing on the EA Microtransaction controversy,

Net Neutrality and the usual

Steam Rants.

I again recommend a daily channel visit.

BeatEmUps is happy about the Nintendo Switch

version of Skyrim and he has made a nice live-action

video for it. He also has finally passed the

100.000 subscribers mark on YouTube, congratulations!

In an impressive unboxing video, he opens

packages he has received from fans, then recommends

which switch games to give away this Christmas

and which ones to avoid, and he helds Episode 9

of the "Everything's Taken" podcast

together with Erek Ladd.

MetalJesusRocks recommends gaming pillows,

his cat almost steals the show, and he and

his crew are at the Portland Expo,

where they go hunting for the cheapest game with the

highest metacritic score. He also introduces

10 forgotten games that deserve a successor

and presents his GOG collection.

The focus of Boogie2988 has been again on

EA, Microtransactions and the Battlefront

2 Lootbox-Gate, as well as on a cyberbullying

case in the Magic The Gathering Community,

for which he has to justify himself in another video.

PewDiePie has also played a lot of games again,

so he's still struggling through Getting

Over It, then he's testing user-generated

levels of his own project Animal Super Squad, (short: A.S.S.)

he plays a round of Gang Beasts, gets cyber bullied

in the VR application VR CHAT and

he's taking a look at the upcoming Horror Title Scorn.

He also finally talks about Net

Neutrality and the Epic Games VS 14 year old

Fortnite-Cheater-Kid Lawsuit controversy.

AlphaOmegaSin hasn't released any new videos

since last time, but I visited Blunty who

by the way has a very small dock, namely the

3rd Party Switch Dock from Nyko. He also talks

about to his "It Made Me Sick" Skyrim video

and amuses himself about the haters who fell

for the Clickbait title without watching the actual video.

Finally he gives a possible

outlook on what Fallout 4 could look like on the Nintendo Switch.

And so we're again done with my current

Gaming YouTubers News Overview, you can

find all the mentioned videos in this playlist here.

How did you like the video and what do you think of this series?

Am I too fast and should

I take more time?

Should I introduce more or different YouTubers,

and if so, which ones?

Please write it in the comments section, that would be awesome,

since I am currently trying

out new formats and perform some experiments

on my YouTube channel,

your feedback is especially important!

I am humaldo,

and I thank you for watching!

See you next time!

Bye!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét