We all came here looking for a fortune...
What we found...
...is a whole 'nother story.
For more infomation >> ห้าทหารเสือของซุนกวน สามก๊ก | VZMART - Duration: 11:41. 
For more infomation >> Still Star-Crossed Teaser (SUB ITA) - Duration: 0:13. 
For more infomation >> Clean Backgrounds: You Keep Shooting with Bryan Peterson - Duration: 2:13. 
For more infomation >> Coreanos falando gírias brasileiras / Korean guys saying brazilian slang - Duration: 8:32. 
For more infomation >> На "Евровидении" в Киеве грянул скандал из-за жюри (12.05.2017) - Duration: 2:31. 
For more infomation >> 遊戲驢子 (Videogamedunkey) 瑪利歐賽車8豪華版 中文字幕 - Duration: 3:57. 
For more infomation >> La décolonisation : Indépendances et construction de nouveaux états - Duration: 6:04. 
DECLASSIFIED CIA DOCUMENTS SHOW AGENCY�S CONTROL OVER MAINSTREAM MEDIA & ACADEMIA
A declassified document from the CIA archives in the form of a letter from a CIA task force
addressed to the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency details the close relationship that
exists between the CIA and mainstream media and academia.
The document states that the CIA task force �now has relationships with reporters from
every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly, and television network in the nation,�
and that �this has helped us turn some �intelligence failure� stories into �intelligence success�
stories,� and has contributed to the accuracy of countless others.� Furthermore, it explains
how the agency has �persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold, or even scrap stories
that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources
and methods.�
Although it is a document outlining their desire to become more open and transparent,
the deception outlined by various whistleblowers (example) requires us to read between the
lines and recognize that the relationships shared between intelligence agencies and our
sources of information are not always warranted and pose inherent conflicts of interest.
Herein lies the problem: What is �national security,� and who determines that definition?
JFK bravely told the world that the �dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of
pertinent facts far outweigh[] the dangers which are cited to justify it.� He also
said that �there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will
be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official
censorship and concealment.�
�National security� is now an umbrella term used to justify concealing information,
but who makes these decisions? You can read more about our world of secrecy and the Black
Budget here.
Not only are countless documents classified every single year in North America, but false
information and �fake news� are routinely dispersed, mainly by mainstream media outlets
� a reality that is clearly conveyed in this document and has been expressed by multiple
mainstream media journalists themselves. And as with the NSA surveillance program that
was exposed by Edward Snowden, it�s a global problem.
Dr. Udo Ulfkotte, a prominent German journalist and editor for more than two decades, is one
example. He blew the whistle on public television, stating that he was forced to publish the
works of intelligence agencies under his own name and that noncompliance with these orders
would result in him losing his job. (source)
Sharyl Attkisson and Amber Lyon, both well-known mainstream media reporters and journalists,
have also exposed funded movements by political, corporate, and other special interests, and
have revealed that they are routinely paid by the U.S. government as well as foreign
governments to selectively report and distort information on certain events. (source)(source)
Let�s not forget about Operation Mockingbird, a CIA-based initiative to control mainstream
media.
The document not only outlines the CIA�s role in media, but also the entire entertainment
industry in general, lending further weight to revelations offered by celebrities like
Jim Carrey. He appeared as a guest on Jimmy Kimmel Live, saying that, �For years now,
talk show hosts, people on television, people in sitcoms have been, hired by the government
to throw you off the tracks, to distract you, to make you laugh and stuff like that, make
you happy and docile so you don�t know what�s really going on.�
While some question whether he was merely joking, the facts still remain. Another celebrity,
who was clearly serious, is Roseanne Barr, who referenced the CIA�s MK Ultra mind control
program � a previously classified research program through the CIA�s scientific intelligence
division that tested behavioural modification and perception manipulation on human beings.
What we seem to have here is an attempt to manipulate public perception of global events
through mainstream media and news publications. But what�s perhaps most interesting is the
fact that a lot of people are now waking up and seeing through many of these lies and
manipulation tactics. Instead of just blindly believing what we hear on television, more
people are starting to think critically, do independent research, and examine a wide array
of sources and information.
So many opportunities have emerged within the past few years allowing others to see
this more clearly. One was the recent �fake news� epidemic, where evidence surfaced
exposing information that threatened the global elite. Wikileaks is perhaps one of the greatest
examples. For mainstream media to basically label everything else as �fake news� was
quite ironic, given that it seems the majority of people consider mainstream media themselves
to be the real �fake news,� and this is now even more evident given the information
presented above in this article.
The documents also touch upon the fact that they are constantly in touch with the entertainment
industry, giving advice on scenes and direction, as well as how things happened in certain
situations. Personally, I feel the industry is largely used to push propaganda, like patriotism.
Patriotism is pumped into the population to support a large military in the name of �national
security.� We are being fooled, wars are not waged for defence, but for offence and
to push forth political agendas.
So you see, there are multiple reasons for these CIA connections to various industries.
Academia
From a young age we�re taught that getting an education is the key to living a good life.
Getting a decent job, making good money, even finding the right partner � all depend on
following a certain path. Yet many concepts and topics are, as previously illustrated,
kept from public viewing, and this includes plenty of important science.
The U.S. intelligence community investigated parapsychology (ESP, remote viewing, telepathy,
etc.) for more than two decades, for instance. Russell Targ, a physicist who has spent several
decades working in a U.S. government program exploring these concepts, recently shared
his experience doing so in a TED talk that is now approaching 1 million views.
Another great example of Black Budget science comes from Ben Rich, the second director of
Lockheed Skunkworks, who worked there from 1975-1991. He�s been called the Father of
Stealth, having overseen the development of the first stealth fighter, the F-117 Nighthawk.
Before his death, Rich made several shocking open statements about the reality of UFOs
and extraterrestrials.
�We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked
up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit
humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do it.�
�We now have technology to take ET home. No it won�t take someone�s lifetime to
do it. There is an error in the equations. We know what it is. We now have the capability
to travel to the stars.�
�There are two types of UFOs � the ones we build and the ones �they� build.�
To read more about those comments and examine the sources, you can refer to this article
that goes into more detail about it.
Information like this, including testimony from hundreds of others, suggests that the
�classified world� is much more advanced than our mainstream one.
This particular document states that the agency exposes administrators of academic institutions
to the agency on a regular basis.
Obviously, as with any other job, the CIA would be looking for what they consider to
be qualified individuals. But the document does outline its close relationship with academia
in general.
This is because certain developments and information that stem from academia could threaten national
security and therefore must be kept out of the curriculum, and the public domain.
Take, for example, documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that
reveal how the U.S. government has been using a secret system to withhold the approval of
some applications.
This 50-page document was obtained by Kilpatrick Towsend & Stockton, LLP, who commonly represent
major tech companies that include Apple, Google, and Twitter (to name a few). You can view
that entire document here. (source)
The program delaying patent applications is called the Sensitive Application Warning System
(SWAS). Usually when an application is submitted for a patent approval, it requires a couple
of examiners who work with the Patent Office to go through their process of approval. This
process usually takes one to two years, but applications that are filed in SAWS must be
approved from several people, and can be delayed for a number of years.
One great example (out of many) of delayed patent applications comes from Dr. Gerald
F. Ross, who filed a patent application for a new invention he had devised to defeat the
jamming of electromagnetic transmissions at specified frequencies. It was not until June
17, 2014 (almost 37 years later) that this patent was granted. (source)
It�s important to note (as reported by the Federation of American Scientists � see
annotated bibliography) that there were over 5,000 inventions that were under secrecy orders
at the end of fiscal year 2014, which marked the highest number of secrecy orders in effect
since 1994. (source)
Steven Aftergood from the Federation of American Scientists reports:
The 1971 list indicates that patents for solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review
and possible restriction if the photovoltaics were more than 20% efficient. Energy conversion
systems were likewise subject to review and possible restriction if they offered conversion
efficiencies �in excess of 70-80%.� (source)
This is all thanks to an act many people are unaware of. It�s called the �Invention
Secrecy Act,� and it was written in 1951. Under this act, patent applications on new
inventions can be subject to secrecy orders, which can restrict their publication if government
agencies believe that their disclosure would be harmful to national security. (source)(source)
Final Thoughts
So, as you see, science and academia in the mainstream world can only go so far. We continue
to rely on government institutions to define truth and reality for us, to outline the limits
of what is possible. In many instances, these places to which we go to �learn� are actually
diminishing, not supporting, our creativity and critical thinking skills. That�s not
to say that there aren�t good aspects of the experience, but overall, we are not accessing
our full potential.
When information is hidden from us as well as manipulated at the same time, it�s only
going to spark more curiosity among the people. And that�s one aspect of the current shift
in consciousness that�s happening on our planet. We�re beginning to see the human
experience in a different light, and starting to recognize that the time
for change is really here. What are we going to do about it?
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét