The wrath that the NFL has been feeling from its fans has been painful with each passing
day this week.
The league likely assumed that the pressure would soon dissipate and this week and the
season would return to normal.
It didn't let up, in fact, the league has crumbled under the pressure and are may now
be unable to continue after receiving a death blow more devastating than their epic ratings
plunge.
Letting an issue fester and go unchecked has devastating consequences which the national
football league can now probably speak to now.
They should have gotten ahead of the issue before it their industry required life support
to stay afloat, but they didn't, and now someone has just pulled the plug.
The NFL is in denial over the massive drop in viewership, blaming it on literally anything
they can come with outside the obvious.
Even once DirecTV said they would offer refunds to any disappointed customers who had purchased
the "NFL Sunday Ticket" to watch any and all games on their network, and tens of thousands
of former fans took them up on the offer, they still can't seem to understand that
it's their players' protests which are the problem.
Since that didn't send the message or at least one they will actually acknowledge,
money will talk – especially when it's a lot.
Wall Street is a lot bigger than the NFL and just issued a blow to the league that's
going to be hard to recover from.
Regardless of the financial industry's stance on kneeling, they are recognizing what the
NFL insists on ignoring and that's that these anti-American antics are really bad
for business.
The Conservative Tribune reports:
According to Bloomberg, major investment bank JPMorgan Chase just gave a brutal outlook
to the NFL and the networks that are carrying its games, singling out the anthem protests
as one of the reasons the entities could be in serious trouble.
According to Bloomberg, analyst Shawn Quigg said investors should bet against CBS stock
ahead of this week's NFL matchups, arguing that more controversy could tank the stock.
"The bank recommends buying an option that gives you the right to sell the shares at
$57.50 on the likelihood that the stock will fall below that price after the company discloses
ratings for the games," Quigg said in a note to investors.
"CBS closed at $58 on Tuesday."
"NFL-related revenue is not trivial to CBS, and any decline in NFL viewership related
to the national anthem debate may negatively affect future results," he added.
"We view this weekend's viewership results as a cleaner proxy in determining whether
the anthem debate may be a larger issue for the NFL, and CBS, or not."
Using the massive increase in sales of Steelers' Alejandro Villanueva's jersy, after he initially
went out on a patriotic limb to stand for the anthem, Quigg said it became obvious where
the majority of America stood on the anthem issue.
"If one uses player jersey sales as a proxy, fans appear to favor an on-field standing
presence during the anthem," Quigg noted, adding that another week of controversy and
bad ratings could possibly "mobilize investors to take the potential impact more seriously,"
according to Conservative Tribune.
Bloomberg noted that the NFL represents 10 percent of CBS' total ad dollars which is
significant in the grand scheme of things.
When investors pull back, it doesn't bode well for profits altogether.
Since the NFL doesn't want to listen to their fans, those associated with them will,
and perhaps they'll listen to big businesses and investors.
Perhaps CBS can put the pressure on the NFL to change their game on these protests and
stop it in an urgent effort to save their stock.
This proves that boycotts have worked in sending a message that America is important to fans,
or at a minimum, that people don't want politics mixed with sports.
It's disappointing that the NFL refused to see the fallout ahead of time to prevent
it.
This poor decision on the players' parts and those who supported it within the industry
has now affected many people's lives in a multitude of negative ways.
This is why it's not okay to mix controversial issues where they don't belong.
It has nothing to do with a difference of opinions and everything to do with listening
to what your fans and customers want.
Nobody is demanding that players not express themselves, they just shouldn't use their
job in sports to do it.
CBS is the first of like many more stocks analysts will warn about.
what do you think about this?
Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe
top stories today.
For more infomation >> BREAKING: NFL Can't Continue After Who Just Pulled The Plug On Entire League Before Weekend Games - Duration: 4:33.-------------------------------------------
ONE WEEK SKETCHBOOK TOUR CHALLENGE - Duration: 4:32.
Hi guys and welcome back to my channel
two weeks ago I decided to challenge myself
in the "one week sketchbook tour challenge"
which consists to fill a sketchbook, like this,
in a specific time, like a week
unfortunately I must admit that I completely failed this challenge,
because to finish it I spent almost two weeks
unfortunately I had other commitments and other bickering and I could not finish it in a week.
If you follow me on Instagram and you see my "Instagram stories"
probably, some sketches that you will see you already know
cause after I drew them I immediately posted them on my profile Instagram.
These sketches are made very quickly, like less than one hour
the technique that I have used are the acrylic colors and watercolors
so, I hope you enjoy this video, and now I leave you with the sketchbook tour.
-------------------------------------------
🔴LIVE Fortnite Noob goes wild - Ep. 1 - Base Building Fortnite Gameplay - Duration: 1:19:36.
-------------------------------------------
Police chief: No involvement in city manager's firing - Duration: 2:48.
-------------------------------------------
Hormonal Balance - Safe and Effective Supplements - Duration: 1:32.
Nick: Hello! We're going to talk about some important issues regarding bioidentical hormones.
I'm Dr. Nick Delgado. I'm with Dr. Michael Grossman, MD with BodyLogic, a practitioner
and expert in hormonal replacement.
One last question, Dr. Michael Grossman, you've been in the field of nutritional integrative
therapy for a number of years. You've looked at a lot of supplements and programs and I
know in your practice, you look at whatever works for that individual patient. Have you
used some of the Delgado protocol supplements and do you integrate them with other supplements
that you like and work that together with balancing of hormones and the overall care
of your patients?
Michael: Using natural herbal and nutritional supplements is a big part of my practice.
And so, I love the products that you make available for people because they're very
safe and they're also very effective, and I use a variety of nutritional products in
my office which enhance all the things that I use which are prescription kinds of things.
So all the hormones and so forth, many of them aren't prescriptions and I certainly
use them, and combining them together has been just a wonderful experience to make a
huge difference in people's wellness and experience of vitality.
Nick: And I didn�t pay you to say that, did I, Dr. Grossman?
Michael: No sir.
Nick: Thank you very much, Dr. Grossman. It's a pleasure.
Michael: It's a pleasure indeed.
Nick: Nick Delgado of Simply Healthy TV saying be healthy. Talk to you soon.
[0:01:31] End of Audio
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1
1234;<=>CD� , 0 8 B [ y �
� �
� �� &FK��1
2 9
o z
� �
� �
� �
./������ž��������������������|�v�p����������� hI�^J
h�|k^J h�"^J
h�<�^J h�i�^J
hFW�^J h^J
h� k^J h�C�^J
h��^J he�^J
h� C^J h�R^J
h�Ex5�^J hFN�5�^Jh>�h>�5�^J
h>�5�^JhFN�h�i^JhFN�5�CJ(^JaJ(h�ph�p5�CJ(^JaJ(,23=> �
� 2
3 p
q �
� �
� �
� /0G���������������������$���`�^��`�`�a$gdFW�$���`�^��`�`�a$gdI�$���`�^��`�`�a$gdy�$���`�^��`�`�a$gdZ*J$a$gd�
C/0235689:GHJKMNPQSTklmnqrs�������������������Ÿ����h�#�mHnHuh`-�jh`-�UhG�jhG�U h�&5�^J
h�p5�^Jh�%,h�%,5�^J h� C5�^J
h;�5�^JGIJLMOPRSopqrs�������������$���`�^��`�`�a$gdZ*J,,$a$gdFN� 21�h:pz���/ ��=!��"��#��$��%�������0v���������666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>666666666666666666666666666�6666666666�666666666666hH66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666�62����
0@P`p������2(�� 0@P`p������ 0@P`p������ 0@P`p������
0@P`p������ 0@P`p������ 0@P`p��8X�Vx��������
0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@��
0@�� 0@�� 0@�� 0@666OJQJ_HmH nH sH tH @`��@|1�NormalCJ_H aJmH sH tH
ZZ|1�� Heading 1$���<@&5�CJ KH OJPJQJ\�aJ \\|1�� Heading 2$���<@&
5�6�CJOJPJQJ\�]�aJVV|1�� Heading 3$���<@&5�CJOJPJQJ\�aJJJ|1��
Heading 4$���<@&5�CJ\�aJNN|1�� Heading 5
���<@&5�6�CJ\�]�aJHH|1�� Heading 6
���<@&5�CJ\�aJ::|1�� Heading 7
���<@&@@|1�� Heading 8 ���<@&6�]�N N|1�� Heading 9
���<@&CJOJPJQJaJDA ���DDefault Paragraph FontRi���R0Table Normal�4�
l4�a�(k ���( 0No ListR����R|1��Heading 1 Char5�CJ
KH OJPJQJ\�aJ T���T|1��Heading 2 Char 5�6�CJOJPJQJ\�]�aJN���N|1��Heading
3 Char5�CJOJPJQJ\�aJB���!B|1��Heading 4 Char5�CJ\�aJH���1H|1��Heading
5 Char5�6�CJ\�]�aJ:���A:|1��Heading 6 Char5�\�<���Q<|1��Heading
7 CharCJaJB���aB|1��Heading 8 Char6�CJ]�aJ@���q@ |1��Heading 9 CharOJPJQJV>V|1��Title$���<@&a$5�CJ
KHOJPJQJ\�aJ J����J|1�� Title Char5�CJ KHOJPJQJ\�aJ FJF|1��Subtitle$�<@&a$OJPJQJF����F|1��
Subtitle CharCJOJPJQJaJ*W���*|1�`Strong5�\�:X���:|1�@Emphasis5�6�OJQJ]�4��4|1� No SpacingaJ D��D|1� List Paragraph
��^��m$*�*!|1��Quote 6�8���8 |1��
Quote Char6�CJaJP�P#|1�� Intense Quote"����]��^��
5�6�aJF���1F"|1��Intense Quote Char
5�6�CJB!��AB|1�0Subtle Emphasis6�B*phZZZJ��QJ|1�PIntense Emphasis5�6�>*CJaJD��aD|1��Subtle
Reference>*CJaJD��qD|1�Intense Reference 5�>*CJF���F|1�
Book Title5�6�CJOJPJQJaJ6 6|1�pTOC Heading)@& 4�4+FN�0Header
* �H�$:����:*FN�0Header CharCJ_H
aJ4 @�4-FN�0Footer ,
�H�$:����:,FN�0Footer CharCJ_H aJH��H
/FN�0Balloon Text.CJOJQJ^JaJR����R.FN�0Balloon Text CharCJOJQJ^J_H aJPK!����[Content_Types].xml���N�0E�H���-J��@%�ǎǢ|�ș$�ز�U��L�TB�
l,�3��;�r��Ø��J��B+$�G]��7O٭V��<a����(7��I��R�{�pgL�=��r����8�5v&����uQ�뉑8��C����X=����$�?6N�JC�������F�B.ʹ'�.�+���Y�T���^e5�5�� ��ð�_�g -�;�����Yl�ݎ��|6^�N��`�?���
[ ��PK!�֧��6_rels/.rels���j�0���}Q��%v/��C/�}�( h"���O�
������=������ ����C?�h�v=� �Ʌ��%[xp��{۵_�Pѣ<�1�H�0���O�R�Bd���JE�4b$
��q_����6L��R�7`�������0̞O� �,�En7�Li�b��/�S���e��е������PK!ky���theme/theme/themeManager.xml�M
� @�}�w��7c�(Eb�ˮ��C�AǠҟ����7��՛K Y,�
�e�.���|,���H�,l����xɴ��I�sQ}#Ր���� ֵ+�!�,�^�$j=�GW���)�E�+&
8���PK!� L8�� theme/theme/theme1.xml�Y͋���?4}��խ���O��3��d�=�H���Tw��Ҍ�b�S.��&䐅��!�,��.��1�$�?"��[�URɞ0aF0t�~�կ�{��S���^&Ի�\��������t�$�z��٤��=!Q�@����o��?���_�EG2� �@>G���R���U1�a$�N�%�
��ʣꂣKЛ�j�VkUDR�KQj/�d���R���*SxM�PsʧJ5�$4vq^W�CʽD{>̳`�3�R�EB�=����꽻Ut�Qy@��\.X�7�<:+& �0h��@�>n��ƭB���V�q1u���`�X�=:t�ڣf����{����Xx
��{��dV�����=|����kP�o��۵�(h[x �)I��е��nW[@��;��0�����PD��b�Ry(���
�"IROnVx���CD�'� �b�J���Z�6�5���I[adH+^�D� )>��s��=�h�
�۟ ~���7� z��Wo^�=�[���Q�r�|���|�[��?|��� ̦����o�{�� �O=��4��?}�������������}��L��$Xx����%�@
|Ư'1�1%�i$P��,�c[�GD�7���sH5.�����4�kIƉ<e�wZᡚ�0�l�F�����=E��5�������X�R9��E� E�DN���w�c�� IJ�)�s&�Rz_o���$3rfES)tL���E�m���7`Ե�����7u��aj��>ZK��T�PBM��
�HN7|n��B��#L�7^`!\2�9��p�CH3n���Mb#�$�.�'�19b��%+vJ���~.�!D���I���;D��Pz��� ����l�2�I��͚;|y3+~��Dؕj�<�Rl�gt֑�'St�{�>w0��e����1v�dǪzO��^I57�y�+d�8b��nv��
�4?��6C�K\���M�#= ċ�(��0����'1� �z�x�p� W�c�/_X4��/A_[�)�^���&(f���p�[��_�����N���iK7@wd5=
I?���>�������_�q샏��[�ꚝΡdr�����v5C���ojFh�>�PG�3�mOs�����=͡�|���7n;:��N&?\�8�Lټ@_�<��}�<�YJ�rC��?~�,&0���'.NW1<�2X��#-�q& Cd<��
N��R�\u$�ph�������S��;�uu��UV�d9^�q8����.� ��m�Z���uH��$���2�>��9H�}]��R�u��Vx~p{�3������As�P~�\���v����!cZ
�6JOw׃�S��B� ��H�f�Ж�
���gp�j�*4���n�R��2��B����M} r����f���w��[�Bf�V=
��� v��ͅh7/sɳ �̲�B���3�뤓e��H�=J����_���:�hn�$�O�\�ʧF�n;/�x.M�#���+d�,W8���7+I�wO�ťwF��)��ue�pwPϬ�
pV$�2�v S�v��(C�8����L�\��~+l`��k�&��Y�
�iT��U#�p��~XHY�H�eʹ�����,fͰ-;��Y�7XmM9ͬ�Y��M��m����*/�稺W(�r2��b���U��G�ڱ]��]�HY��U�c��F8���U~�ۍZZn�Jmi}kn^l���<F�宩ڕp��4DSݓdi��K�o x�֜��/ka?6�a�� Ǖ��*��߬�ðY���h�x�E�I=�n�'p�A7����O�w4w�,�2}7_����}�q���#�t�l5&�fwЪt��I%
:��5��Z��h2�����]hp�o�ָSiՇ�JЪ)��n�4���������g�#��W��_��PK! ѐ��'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels��M
�0���wooӺ�&݈Э���5 6?$Q��
�,.�a��i����c2�1h�:�q��m��@RN��;d�`��o7�g�K(M&$R(.1�r'J��ЊT���8��V�"��AȻ�H�u}��|�$�b{��P����8�g/]�QAsم(����#��L�[������PK-!����[Content_Types].xmlPK-!�֧��60_rels/.relsPK-!ky���theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!� L8�� �theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-!
ѐ��'� theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]�<?xml
version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <a:clrMap xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main"
bg1="lt1" tx1="dk1" bg2="lt2" tx2="dk2" accent1="accent1" accent2="accent2" accent3="accent3" accent4="accent4"
accent5="accent5" accent6="accent6" hlink="hlink" folHlink="folHlink"/>s���� ***-/s
Gs $&-!����8�@�����������0�( �
��B �S���� ?���GGIJJLMOPRSnqt��HJGIJLMOPRSqt33@@BB��
&FK�����19oz������./0FGGIJJLMOPRSqt@@BB�� &FK�����19oz������./0FGGIJJLMOPRSqtP�Oy!`��\d�e{\�cr
3"<N�p�K<D]c�hYz�=Yj�o�t�t� �; �; 6E �
$ �3
]f 11�5�D�F�i%g{w
� -��o*O� $
�L�Vt� ��L,[3*�>�Bs�&�&i0M9�R�Y�n�p�%6)�?��"�x�1�R]|�K)9�J�i�,�v��#�.�I�[4i�>�M{�u�\H�q�G1
<�~� � b
�D @R �{ ;J!�v!"Z"�"$"�c"uz#`$�9%�:%�l%�L&Z& B'1]'�$)�6)*!/*�8*_?*1)+�-+�9+�N+�q+�,�,�%,z6,gD,�F,�G,vv,%-;--�D-Fv-�6.�I.�e.}s.O/-]/�0db0x0�$2g[2@^2�,3�E3�.4�f4Mj4�5�5D'5vB5�K5�V5f,6�7�8j#8�+8^G8c9�.9�F9�X9z9�:oM;<�H<�_<M=>1->X;>7N>�\>�h>N~>$?�(?�I?7r?�@�.@4F@7A#cA�}A�B,;BZB@kB�
C~<C�_C�#DF\D9jEiFUoF�|F�GgG�%G�kGH�H�YHRrHIbnIZ*J�K�4K�`K-NL�uL Mt>M�bM9GN�^N�&O�;O�*P?KPhlP�yPuzP�~P�
Q�OQM]Q�RReROR� SFS�5S1qS�tS�T<T�T�LTrRTtVT�UsHW�cWfW�rW
X�XGXY3X�8X(|XvY#Y�+Y}FY�[YodY�fYOmY�zY� ZDZ�"ZY'ZR]Z�;[I[7 \U\�H]W\]\l]("^A%^�(^�+^Gc^�l^1r^�t^�z^G_Qg_``�F`T}`ga�a)arGacta�bi)b1c�d�bd?tdfRe~e�f�Gf�Jf�Tf�3gb6h|Xh�oh�qhA)i/8i!}i�%j�,j8k�
k<kFKk�|k_ladldRm�emChm~tm,Tn?o�2o�Fo�p�p�(p+p4?p�tp�wpdq�Dq�IqQMq�Rq�oqAr1+r3Nr�Xr� s�\su_s�us�us�t�to#t�+t�ct�gt�vt�yt@2u)Bugv�iv�~v1w�wu/wEw!awKow?7x;=x�Ex�Lx�\y�z7/zclz{�{�
{#{O{-%{�*|�z|�}U#}�*}Z}�G~+r~Et~uo �1��"��6�#s��x��k���X\��n�=#�M��i���I��e��x�y��,��2��4�lj��m�;�"����%�<M�ro�I{�-j�
��-�/��M��V��P��r�J�y6�FV��4��U�?m�/o�pG��S��#�PK��K��O��\�\�G����<�SD�V ��s�Az���^ �v�C!��3�
6�o[��`��x�T��7���)��e����'��)�}g����&��+�p.�O�T�[��[��k��s��|�>�8/��<��A�dy�X1� ���#��'��'�dO�pl��>�y�x'�f��
�:,�~@��R��u���?�#5� T�����yw��}��H�aQ�0Z��d��m�
n������B�RL�FN��U�~� �it��'��=�5~�L��� s�
b��e�X?��_�xc�rx�V{�b��V�=c��%��5��=�@�vR�h��}�R=�/A�� �pH����F�aJ�DQ��j��k���b��e�'�r����J&��9��>��H��N�Y^��[��)��3��;�OY��}�E~�(�[=�G��N����@��P�?
�Ne�J �E��1�4��5��8�q|��3�,Q�`Y�uY��p��v�E �R��<�)0��:��?�rV��:��k����]��j��u�
�[5��*�}.��a���.��_�e�#w�?�>��g/��0�|1��R�b���K"��1���~!�7'��e����4�T�� ��j�L<�=I�Gq��C��S�1U�/m�M��e����
�����=��=���/*��=��=��>�-�<��V�%z��8�fj��-��3�Q��W�!%�[H��J�I��R�p�,��F�P�z"��^��f� k�/r�s��#��;��H�6U�f��p�o�"��6�M��S�Cb�2m�S�S��!��T�����4Q�!T�+p�
��=�ji�K�M�`;��K��j���F��i���{ ���OY�tr��,��B��E��b�z��1��S��;�^]�5
�w%��)�xE�bO��R��6���9�_T��r��?��Y.�)e�n��|���s1��M�FW��Y�tF�L��B��l�5�J�`-��|��������`�do��y��[�)n�Pn�0�G5��7�L�wS��p�� �-���*G�_T��V��3��}��$�3��T��^�����(&��f�I)�M��h���7��K�s�K=��U�Tb��<�,O�wO��v�VM��R��������Dw�GI�@�s�@��Unknown������������G��*�Ax�
�Times New Roman5��Symbol3.��*�Cx� �Arial7.�����@ �Calibri7���K@�Cambria5.��.�[`�)�TahomaA����
B�Cambria Math"1���h@�K'@�K'�X��X!�������24DD3����HP ��$P���� ��� ��� ��� ��� <T2!xx����Audio
File NameRamWhite������Oh��+'��0\������� ��
$ 0<DLT�Audio File NameRamNormalWhite2Microsoft
Office Word@@h���I�@h���I��X����՜.��+,��0hp�������� ���Grizli777DAudio File NameTitle
���� !"#$%&'(����*+,-./0����2345678��������;������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Root Entry�������� �F �� �I�=�1Table��������
�7WordDocument��������4SummaryInformation(����)DocumentSummaryInformation8������������1CompObj������������r������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ ���� �F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document
MSWordDocWord.Document.8�9�q
-------------------------------------------
DeMarre Carroll Dunked All Over These Poor Students - Duration: 2:17.
Hey everyone, for Complex News, I'm Justin Block.
So, this doesn't require much explaining, but let's all say it out loud so we're
all on the same page: Professional basketball players can physically destroy any other quote-un-quote
"normal" person when presented with a hoop and a ball.
It's what they do for a living, but against each other.
As you can clearly see, it's an absolutely brutal act.
And some students at the U.S. Naval Academy, well, they were looking for trouble when the
Brooklyn Nets came to visit this week.
Hanging out in the mess hall, a few young midshipmen wanted to challenge Nets forward
DeMarre Carroll to a little backyard one-on-one action.
You know, just to play around a little.
And that's fine and all, but if they were expecting an NBA player to allow a mortal
to score on him, well, they were gravely mistaken.
Roll the clip:
So, after watching that, it's clear that no bodies or feelings were hurt.
The kid took an L and everyone laughed.
But these feisty midshipmen kept on poking the bear, so Carroll finished them off.
Just watch:
My goodness.
That hurts to watch from every angle.
But then again, how many of us can say they've been dunked on, or straight-up schooled by
an NBA player?
In a weird way, that's a badge of honor to wear as a fan.
And frankly, it's one that many, many fans have worn before.
Just ask this kid after he spent a few seconds with Jahlil Okafor:
And we might want to check-in on this little kid, who did nothing wrong except shoot his
basketball anywhere close to Karl-Anthony Towns:
That was really bad, but not Kevin Durant bad.
And by "Kevin Durant bad," I mean, what you're about to watch is the most savage
NBA player-fan interaction there's been this decade:
Thankfully, for all of us mortals, the NBA season starts next month, which means players
will start dunking on and blocking each other instead of us.
That's the news for now, but for more on the NBA, be sure to subscribe to Complex on YouTube
today.
For Complex News, I'm Justin Block.
-------------------------------------------
When Do Spirits Stop By The 4 Most Common Times A Spirit Or Guar - Duration: 4:18.
When Do Spirits Stop By?
The 4 Most Common Times A Spirit Or Guardian Will Visit You
Once you identify when and how your loved ones or guardian spirits will likely visit
you, you�ll be increasingly more aware and prepared for the next time they want to stop
by.
In general, in order for a spirit to visit you, a great deal of energy must be expended
on their end � coming down to the physical realm, shifting their energetic vibration
so they can be felt, moving objects or making noise if they can, etc.
Since it takes so much energy for them to visit � your loved ones want to make the
most of their attempts to connect with you.
To make the most of their visit, your guardian spirits have a few preferred times, where
connecting with you, would be most noticed.
The 4 Most Common Times To Be Visited:
:: When you�re alone
Your alone time is one of the only times of day when you are not distracted by other people
� thus more likely to notice the subtle shift in the presence of another.
If your alone time is in the evenings or in the very early morning, you might even be
less distracted because you are preoccupying yourself with fewer tasks.
In the evening, many of us are winding down for the day, and naturally, unloading all
of our distractions � communications, media, chores, to-do list, mental chatter.
The fewer distractions you have, the clearer your mind is, and the more likely a deceased
loved one might be able to get your attention.
:: When you�re sleeping/dreaming
An extension of when you are alone, this one happens in an altered state of consciousness.
Even if you do share a bed with someone, usually, when you are woken up from a sleep � you
are doing so as the only one awake in your house.
Thus, sometimes, a loved one may attempt to visit you at night, especially if this is
the only time you are calm and your mind is quiet.
While your loved ones don�t always *intend* to wake you up (sometimes they just like to
be with you!), occasionally they will.
Next time you are suddenly awoken, a visit from a loved one may be the reason.
:: During a difficult time in your life
You are going through a rough time � a time of transition or crisis, a time or existential
reflection, a relationship shift, a period of release and letting go, or time of questioning.
If you lost someone who was your cushion to fall on, your comfort and support, or your
shoulder to cry on � your loved one will still visit you to provide you this comfort.
In fact, this is a really common one for grandmothers and romantic partners who are on the Other
Side.
:: During family memory events
Wedding, engagements, births, sporting events, ceremonies, presentations, promotions, buying
a house, sending a child of to college, winning an award, freeing yourself from a bad situation,
and many others.
These are all events that your loved ones do not want to miss.
Concerned that your mother passed just before the birth of your child?
Don�t be.
She�ll be there.
These are the four most common times, however, here are also times of days when the veil
between the spiritual world and the physical world is thinnest � which can make it easier
for you to sense Spirit, and therefore, see them or feel them more than you normally would.
-------------------------------------------
Fallen officers' names added to memorial - Duration: 1:43.
-------------------------------------------
BTS (방탄소년단) Pied Piper MV - Duration: 4:11.
I like it more because it's bad You know it deep down
Now we don't stop (You can't stop) Be more honest
Stop
watching and and start studying for your exams
Your parents and boss hate me
The video clips you watched, various pictures and
tweets V app, bon voyage
I know that you like it, what do you do
Stop. You can make MV theories later
You already have plenty of my pictures in your room
Not one hour, but a year or two flashes by
This song is a reward I give you Good girl
You're not being punished
Come here, you are my paradise
Can't close your eyes
You may struggle but it won't matter anymore
(Don't reject me)
Just close your eyes and listen closely
Follow the sound of the flute, follow this song
It may be a little dangerous but I'm very sweet
I'm here to save you, I'm here to ruin you
You're the one who called me, see how it's sweet
Follow the sound of the flute
OH OH OH OH OH OH
I'm takin' over you
OH OH OH OH OH OH
I'm takin' over you
You know that it's already begun
The moment you heard the sound
Yeah maybe I'm a little dangerous
Like a guy who leads you with a flute
You test me , test me
I'm knowingly drawn to you like
the fruit on the tree of knowledge
My flute wakes everything up
The sound of it makes you worry more
ou react because you're drawn to it
I play the flute endlessly
I am your guilty pleasure
You can never get out of this Never
You are not being punished
Come here, I am your paradise
Can't close your eyes
Can't close your eyes
You may struggle but it won't matter anymore
(Don't reject me)
Just close your eyes and listen closely
Follow the sound of the flute, follow this song
It may be a little dangerous but I'm very sweet
I'm here to save you, I'm here to ruin you
You're the one who called me, see how it's sweet
Yeah I'm a little dangerous
I can't handle myself either
Don't worry, my hands are
Warm, warm only to you
If I am
Ruining you
Will you forgive me
Because I can't live without you
Because I know
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
I'm takin' over you
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH
I'm takin' over you
THANK YOU FOR WATCHING IF YOU LIKE THIS VIDEO PUT LIKE AND SUBSCRIBE :)
-------------------------------------------
Echoes Of DAPL: New Hampshire's Northern Pass Dilemma - Duration: 4:35.
New Hampshire residents are challenging the proposed 180 mile power line project of Northern
Pass that will run through most of the state.
One small town is even taking in donations for a legal fund that they have been using
to keep the fight going strong in court.
Joining me now to talk about this is legal journalist for Trial Lawyer Magazine, Mollye
Barrows.
Mollye, thank you for coming.
Definitely.
Glad to be here, Peter.
Glad to have you here filling in for Pap today.
Thank you.
So why's this project controversial?
What's the big deal?
Well, it seems like the entire state of New Hampshire is opposed to this project.
It's been off and on the radar for a number of years now.
It's basically a collaboration project between two power companies.
One out of Quebec.
In fact, it's called Quebec ... Where is the name of this?
Hydro Quebec is that one company, and then the other energy provider is Eversource, which
is based in New Hampshire.
So for years they've been trying to bring this new basically an extension of this Canadian
power company through New Hampshire claiming that it would have greener energy, it would
bring lower energy bills, that it would provide jobs, and then, of course, there would be
more taxable value to all of those things.
But a number of people are opposed to this and have been for a long time whether it's
citizens or environmental groups or government agencies.
So the small town of Deerfield is one of them.
Basically, all their concerns are it's not going to look good.
New Hampshire's a beautiful state.
We've got a lot of forests.
We've got a lot of hiking.
We're got a lot of conservation land, a lot of animals, and natural fisheries that we
want to protect.
They're concerned that all the work that will go into this, whether it's creating dams and
reservoirs or utilizing the ones that they've already got, that it's going to create more
problems.
There's a Canadian Indian tribe that's based in that area.
They're also concerned about delicate salmon fisheries, violating their hunting lands.
So you name it, everybody's got an ax to grind with this project.
They have been back and forth to the drawing board several times.
Now, is this part of the trend?
Everybody's heard about the Dakota pipeline that everyone challenged.
There was huge protests.
The federal government brought in.
Do you think this is part of that trend?
Is this a similar objection?
Are there some overlap between the two?
Well, I think some of the overlap could very well be the issue of private citizens and
corporate going up head to head against corporations.
Whose interests are better?
Who's got the most influence in Washington?
I think that's a lot of what you saw in the Dakota pipeline process.
I think what you're seeing in New Hampshire is less of that and more of perhaps at one
time they might could have gotten away with something like that, but you've got all eyes
on this project pretty much since the beginning and, I hate to say it, but almost a more influential
group of citizens.
More than 160 individuals, government agencies, as well as regular environmental groups that
are opposed to this project, and they've all been speaking out in different ways.
Everything from we want your power lines buried.
We don't want them above ground.
They've gone back to the drawing board two or three times just to revise the location.
Even imminent domain is another issue that could cross between this and other projects
where a company wants to come in and just do a land grab based on right of way in order
to serve the public need, the greater good.
But in this case, the entire state was so opposed to it that the New Hampshire legislature
took the step in 2012 of basically outlawing the process of imminent domain when it came
to power lines.
I mean, there were some caveats.
So Deerfield went out and they actually started raising money?
Yes.
I mean, once they got the money in, what have they done?
What's the method that they're using?
Well, this 192 long mile power line project will end in the small town of Deerfield.
In fact, it's going to cross some 30 some small towns right through the middle of the
state, right through the middle of these towns.
Again, they're worried about aesthetics.
How's this going to look to our town?
Is it going to impact tourism?
We just don't want it in our town.
So essentially, they're trying to hire an attorney.
They've been working with an attorney for the past year.
Now, last year the citizens voted not to fund an attorney specifically to fight this, but
there are enough citizens in this town that saw we do want to fight it, we're going to
fundraise.
So they're fighting it?
Yes.
In closing, tell me where's the legal case stand?
Where is it now?
Well, right now, they don't even have state approval.
So they're still going through the state permitting process.
There's a state committee that will continue to hear people on this issue, have hearings
on it through December.
Then in February of next year is when they're going to decided whether or not the project
moves forward.
So in some situations, if they do decide to move the project forward, some citizens may
be happy with how it turns out.
Perhaps they got the plan moved, they got power lines under ground.
Whatever their particular was may be addressed, but I don't know who they're going to make
everybody happy.
But at least there's some leeway.
It's not just a black and white as in the Dakota pipeline issue.
We're going to move forward whether you like of or not.
We're going to shove it down your throats.
Right.
There's some compromise.
That's New Hampshire versus some of the other companies maybe?
Federal lands perhaps.
Right.
Well, thank you very much, Mollye, for coming.
We appreciate your time.
-------------------------------------------
Vigil honors domestic violence victims - Duration: 1:51.
-------------------------------------------
Man accused of firing at officers appears in court - Duration: 1:24.
-------------------------------------------
Qualquer Zed Faz «by Celler» - Duration: 2:14.
-------------------------------------------
New Wheels and Tires Make a Car!!! New Upgrades for the Subaru STI Project!! Steve's POV - Duration: 8:03.
Hi Everyone! I'm Steve with Steve's POV.
It's been a while since we did some work to the Subaru WRX STI.
I have done some small customization to the car so far....
Coilovers, exhaust, racing seat....
Today it's finally time to change these tires and wheels.
Of the different factory Subaru wheels, I do like these a lot...
and my son likes them too.
But when it comes to car customization, there is nothing more basic than wheels and tires!
Even when I was young, tires and wheels were the first to get changed out!
We bought a set of wheels and tires for this car on a budget.
They aren't expensive but look forward to how they are going to look on this car!
We spent some time looking for a nice set of wheels at good price.
Since this is my son's car, he is paying for the new wheels and tires, not me!
I explained to him this is stuff he needs to work for an pay for himself.
He saved some money from his part time job and just bought these wheels and tires.
We wanted to find the coolest wheels within his budget.
My friends at Aspec Wheels hooked us up!
This is what we decided on!
Honestly I never heard of this brand before...
I can't even pronounce it either!! LOL
But they look cool!
We shouldn't need any spacers or anything to have these mount and look good!
We of course opted for Toyo Tires!
Aspec wheels included a nice gift for us! These colored lug nuts!
I think this Subaru STI is about to get a whole lot cooler!!
Lets get these on the car!!!
Wow!! What a difference!
I like the way it looks!
It looks like a different car!
The fitment is very good!!
It might rub a little but who cares!! LOL
The goal was to find nice wheels and tires within a tight budget.
I think we did pretty good and the car looks better because of it!
What do you think?
Leave a comment!
I'm ready to go for a drive right now!
-------------------------------------------
SpaceX Wants To Send People To Mars By 2024 - Duration: 2:01.
What's up guys?!
Beija here for Complex.
The world has been in turmoil lately due to back-to-back hurricanes, earthquakes, and
other natural disasters that have been drastically ruining communities.
Obviously, these are the consequences we're suffering due to climate change caused by
pollution, waste management,o ver-population and so much more.
Now, highly acclaimed business tycoon and engineer Elon Musk is coming to the rescue
to potentially start human civilizations on Mars by 2024 if we can't get things straight
here on earth.
Elon's commercial space agency, SpaceX, is aiming to build a base on the moon and
fly two cargo missions to Mars by 2022 that would be able to locate water and start implementing
power and life support infrastructures.
Musk said:
"It's 2017, we should have a lunar base by now, what the hell's going on?"
The manned mission will follow the cargo flights in 2024 where the travelers will start to
establish solar-powered plants to assist them in returning back to earth.
Musk was speaking in Adelaide, Australia and said that the new "BFR" spacecraft could
hold up to a max of 100 people each for transportation.
The space exploration company revealed that the "BFR" spacecraft is a reusable rocket
that could travel at speeds of up to 16,777 mph, which is INSANE.
Elon Musk shared at the International Astronautical Congress that rockets would be able to fly
people city to city within minutes [PLAY VIDEO 0:10-0:19].
In a promotional video on Youtube, SpaceX displays a simulated rocket that can get you
from New York to London in just 29 minutes
The BFR spaceship would be the biggest one the company has created to date, BUT it would
also be the cheapest because of its multiple capabilities (show 2nd picture in tweet).
The spacecraft would be able to complete other missions such as lifting satellites into orbit.
Over time, Elon Musk envisions that we would eventually get to the point where we could
make the planet a habitable city that would become—according to him—"a really nice
place to be".
[make sure GIF is playing show city built]
If this vision comes to fruition, hopefully humans will learn from the mistakes we've
made on earth and we'll be better stewards of the planet Mars.
That's all the news for now, but for more on future space endeavors, be sure to subscribe
to Complex on Youtube today.
For Complex News, I'm Beija Velez.
-------------------------------------------
Let's Talk About: Charlottesville - Duration: 18:40.
Let's talk about Charlottesville.
First off, what happened.
A group of white nationalists congregated at
the University of Virginia's campus on Friday night.
They chanted slogans, some more hateful than others.
For example, "You will not replace us" and "White lives matter".
The Friday night rally was a peaceful protest,
aside from a minor scuffle near the end.
Then came Saturday.
The day that the Unite the Right protest and
counter protest were scheduled to take place.
The counter protesters arrived earlier than when the
Unite the Right protest was scheduled to take place.
They marched up to McGuffey Park, where they had a permit to protest.
They arrived and set up in McGuffey park.
The white supremacists set up on the only street which
was open for people to enter and leave McGuffey park.
The white supremacists then began throwing tear gas,
balloons filled with urine, using pepper spray and tasering people
The police then came into McGuffey park and pushed the counter
protesters into the street, and into the white supremacists.
The counter protesters had to walk through the crowd
of white nationalists who were yelling things like,
"I believe that we will win",
"Get the F*k out of here"
and "Appreciate the bat"
So, the white supremacists were verbally aggressive
and provoking the counter protesters.
The obvious then happened.
Some counter protesters snapped.
They fought, and people got seriously hurt.
Then later on, as the counter protesters were trying to leave in their vehicles,
one of the white supremacists hit the car of a counter protester with a bat,
because the counter protester was driving
recklessly through a crowd of white supremacists.
The counter protester drove into the crowd
and a group of about half a dozen white supremacists,
descended on the car with bats and clubs.
The counter protester seemed to panic and drove in reverse
into the club wielding white supremacists.
That sounds really bad on the side of the white supremacists right?
It really sounds like they were violent.
But, wait. I told you the story in reverse.
It was the white supremacists who were kicked out of Emancipation Park,
and pushed into the hands of Antifa and BLM (What really happened in Charlottesville).
It was the white supremacists who were told to
"Get the F*K out of there", and "Appreciate the bat".
It was the white supremacists who were tasered,
pepper sprayed, had balloons of urine and tear gas cannisters thrown at them
(Footage of C-P Violence).
It was some of the white supremacists who snapped and fought the counter protesters.
It was a counter protester who began to beat an elderly white man
for no apparent reason (AltRight Parking Garage Battle).
The counter protesters were also the ones waving
bats and clubs at the white supremacists, trying to
get the white supremacists to fight back. (AltRight Parking Garage Battle).
Let me run you through the video evidence and the location of the two sides.
This is a video of the Friday night march through the University of Virginia campus.
In this picture you can see the distance
between Emancipation park and McGuffey park.
Emancipation park is where the statue was and where
the white supremacists had a permit to protest.
McGufey park is where the counter protesters had a permit to protest.
They are separated by 1 block.
This is the parts that were closed off by police.
And these are the two exits through which White Supremacists were pushed out.
This is where AntiFa and BLM where positioned.
Here you can see the tear gas being used by Antifa
(Footage of C-P Violence).
Here you can see counter protesters and white supremacists fighting
(Street War: Charlottesville).
In this video, you can actually see the white supremacists
being pushed into the crowd of counter protesters
(Footage of C-P violence).
Here are some videos showing the white supremacists
walking through AntiFa and BLM.
Also shows the aggressiveness of AntiFa and BLM (Moral Equivalence).
Here you can see an elderly white man being attacked by
what seems to be a member of AntiFa (AltRight Parking Garage Battle).
Here you can see footage of the car that killed Heather Heyer (Moral Equivalence).
Now that you know what happened, we need to talk about 2 things.
These 2 things are completely unrelated.
The first is, the behaviour of both sides.
The second is, what each of the two sides stands for, and who is right.
First of, the behaviour of both sides.
As you can see in this video clip,
the counter protesters were verbally and physically aggressive.
You can also see that the white supremacists
were also verbally and physically aggressive.
The only cases in which violence can be tolerated,
and to a certain extent, are in a war and self-defense.
Neither side in the Charlottesville protest was in a literal war.
There were some cases, however,
of self defense in the Charlottesvillle protest.
But, each and every one of these cases were instigated by an aggressor.
Aggressors came from both sides,
white supremacists and counter protesters.
It is in light of this fact that both sides are guilty of unjust violence,
and thereby, both sides carry blame in this tragedy.
Like President Trump says,
"We condemn in the strongest possible terms, this egregious display of hatred,
bigotry and violence on many sides"
(President Trump Statement on Charlottesville Saturday).
This discussion on the behaviour of both sides should have ended here.
But, the media made it clear that they do not agree that blame lies on both sides.
So, let me explain.
It is illegal to violently attack another individual,
and all the media, especially those who are critizizing President Trump,
would be outraged if the sides had been reversed,
like what I said when I started this video.
They would be condemning the actions of this member of Antifa,
had he been a White Supremacist (AltRight Parking Garage Battle).
They would be condemning the actions of these
counter protesters beating this White Supremacist,
had he been a counter protester (AltRight Parking Garage Battle).
And in fact, some media did.
Here is Deandre Harris, a hip-hop artist
who was beaten in the same fight as the aforementioned white supremacist.
You can see him in the blue hood with the backpack.
Deandre Harris was said to be a victim of this fight.
Suffering a blow to the head.
The media say he is an innocent bystander
who was unjustly beaten by aggressive white supremacists.
But, the counter protesters were the ones
who were aggressive and instigated the fight.
In fact, the first blow in the fight came from Deandre Harris.
Let me walk you through some more footage showing you how the fight began.
Please note that I had to use 3 videos as none of them show the full fight.
Only disjoint parts.
Here are the white supremacists walking down the street.
Note how the white supremacists are peacefully walking down the street,
and it is the counter protesters who are verbally aggressive.
If you go through this video, you will see the man in the red shirt
hit a white supremacists with his stick, which is assault felony.
Assault felony is, "striking or threatening to strike a person
with a weapon or dangerous object" (CriminalDefenseLawyer.com).
Then a counter protester attempts to take the flag of one
of the white supremacists. and they begin a tug of war.
The counter protesters actions, attempt to
take the white supremacist's flag, is theft.
For a case of theft to be proven, it must be shown that the acussed
intended to take a person's property without their permission permanently.
Even in the case where the accused was not succesful.
For example, trying to walk out of a store with some merchandise hidden
in your jacket, and getting caught before succesfully walking out.
Here is video evidence showing that the counter
protester trying to take the flag is part
of Deandre's group of friends there, and that
they did steal another flag and burned it.
Meaning that although he was not succesfull in this
attempt, he still intended to steal the flag permanently.
It is a controversial flag, but that doesn't matter.
It is not his property and is therefore theft.
Please see the find law.com reference explaining theft for more information.
Back to where we left off.
At this point, the man in the red shirt is not engaged in a fight.
Deandre Harris is behind him, although you can't really see him.
In this next video you will see the man in the red shirt still not engaged,
tug of war going on and Deandre Harris behind the man in the red shirt.
Now you see Deandre Harris step in and hit the guy trying to keep his flag.
This is the first blow that we see in this footage and is clearly not in self defence.
The only thing that we see happening before this blow is a tug
of war between a white supremacist and a counter protester.
This act falls in the felony category of crimes.
As it is, "striking or threatening to strike a person
with a weapon or dangerous object" (CriminalDefenseLawyer.com).
Here we have a small gap, as when YouTuber, DuerstTheWuerst turns around,
the man in the red shirt appears engaged.
The man in the red shirt is then pepper sprayed and he runs backwards into Deandre,
knocking Deandre and the white supremacist with the white helmet over.
The supremacist with the white helmet then hits Deandre.
This is assault felony as well, as Deandre was not threatening anyone at that point.
Then he immediately starts running as some counter protesters converge on him.
At this point, it is clear that he is no longer a threat because he
is running from the counter protesters that are coming towards him.
The counter protester in the grey shirt hits him over the head with his bat.
Which is felony as the supremacist was not threatening anyone at that point.
A group of counter protesters then begin beating
the supremacist who is down on the ground.
Again assault felony because he isn't threatening anyone.
Some supremacists then come in and push the counter
protesters off the supremacist who is on the ground.
It is unclear at this point how aware the supremacists
were that Deandre was not a threat, as people
are being hit and falling over from both sides,
and they also know that Deandre has hit someone.
This man walking accross lets you know that there is no gap between these 2 videos.
Deandre is initially beat and then allowed to leave, being told, "Get out of here".
So, Deandre Harris was beaten.
Unclear how aware his attackers were that he was no threat.
Deandre Harris beat someone.
He was aware that his victim posed no threat.
Deandre's friends and the counter protesters there beat a supremacist.
They were aware that he was no threat.
The supremacist beat Deandre. He was aware that Deandre was no threat.
The narrative, that the counter protesters were innocent here and
the white supremacists bear the full blame is clearly false.
Both sides committed assault felony.
To make it clearer, what I am saying is, if it is
wrong for Deandre Harris to be beaten like this.
Then it is also wrong for this white supremacist and
this elderly man to be beaten in the same fashion.
Moreover, here is footage of the Friday night march.
The media hated on this display saying that it is impossible
for any innocent person to be in that crowd, because
"if you are a good person, and you are in a rally,
and people start marching 'Jews will not replace
us', and you stay there, you are not a good person"
(Did Good People Attend Charlottesville).
First off, the counter protesters like BLM and Antifa here are chanting,
If you agree with the Fox News specialist said,
then you would have to agree that if you are in
a crowd with people yelling things like this,
and you stay there, then you are a bad person.
Like Deandre Harris who is right there.
But as you can see, not everyone in both crowds were
partaking in the violence (AltRight Parking Garage Battle).
Secondly, the chant "Jews will not replace us" is either the FOX news
mishearing what the protesters were saying, or a deliberate miscaption.
You can clearly hear it here, the White Supremacists are chanting
"You will not replace us" (Unite the Right torch rally Charlottesville).
I agree, this is still racist,
but the reason this ticks me off, is that the misinformation does not end here.
Many media networks have declared that the White Supremacists
bear the full blame of the rally,
and President Trump's declaration that both sides were guilty,
a 50-50 blame, is a win for White Supremacists.
But, I would argue that it is win for neither side.
As you can see in the Friday night march,
the White Supremacists were peacefully protesting.
There was a minor scruffle near the end with the Alt-left.
What they said was racist, but they weren't physically attacking anyone
(Unite the Right torch rally).
On Saturday, you had members of AntiFa and BLM tasering, pepper spraying
and throwing bags of urine and tear gas cannisters at white supremacists.
The White Supremacists were forced out of their protest zone,
and through this violence.
The White Supremacists fought back (AltRight Parking Garage Battle).
For more information on the white supremacists and
counter protester exhibiting the same behaviour,
please see ShortFatOtaku's video in the description.
The point is that both sides were violent, and
therefore both sides carry blame for the injuries.
The form of this argument is: Premises:
Violently attacking someone is bad behaviour.
Protesters and counter protesters violently attacked each other.
Conclusion: Therefore, both sides partook in bad behaviour.
The form is: Premises:
X is Y. A and B did X.
Conclusion: Therefore, A and B did Y
Now, let's analyze the second point of this event.
What does each side stand for and who is right.
Like I said, this point has nothing to do with the
previous point on the behaviour of both sides,
because anyone can be violent for a 'cause'
(ie. IS, and the shooter at the church in Charleston).
So, what do the protesters (White Supremacists, KKK, etc) stand for?
They are against the removal of confederate statues and monuments.
What do the counter protesters stand for?
They are for the removal of confederate statues and monuments.
Who is right?
Well, what is a statue or a monument?
They are 3D representations of either a person, persons or event.
Why do we have statues?
They are to remember someone for a specific act that they did,
or an event for what it signified.
For example, a statue of George Washington
might be erected to remember him for his indispensable help in defeating the British
and allowing the USA to come into existence.
The statue of George Washington in this case would have nothing to do with his
being a slave owner, and should not be taken down because he was a slave owner.
The reasoning behind this is that the statue does
not promote or glorify his being a slave owner,
rather his work in defeating the British.
If the statue was erected to remember him as a slave owner,
then it should be taken down. As in that case it glorifies slavery.
As an argument, this is: Premises:
The purpose of a statue is to remember someone for a specific act that they did,
or an event for what it signified.
If the specific act, or significance of the event
remembered by the statue is forbidden by law or statute.
Conclusion:
Then that statue is forbidden by law or statute.
The form is: Premises:
A is B If B is C
Conclusion: Then A is C
That's it. Until next time.
-------------------------------------------
Here's My Canada: My Canada is Beautiful - Duration: 0:20.
Canada is a beautiful garden,
I love the air and love the water.
I love the people in Canada.
Canada is our beautiful garden,
I love the air and love the water.
I love the people in Canada.
-------------------------------------------
Cal Football's Vic Enwere Talks the USC Game - Duration: 2:29.
Hi my name is Isabella Marten
I'm here at Memorial Stadium with our
Senior running back Vic Enwere
Unfortunately, this weekend's results didn't go in our favor
Cal lost 20-30 against the USC Trojans
What are you guys hoping to improve
going into this week's game against the Oregon Ducks?
I think we're just focused on playing a complete game
you know the past few weeks
we've been better in one half or the other
I think we came out this past week we had a
really great first half and
things kind of fell apart in the second, so
we're looking to just play
a complete game and play hard for four quarters
In my opinion, you had a really strong game
You scored the first touchdown for Cal
What are your thoughts on that?
You know, my line did a great job up front
and we had a great play call, and we drove the ball
all the way down the field and
You know at that point in time at the game
we had a really great tempo, and that touchdown
you know had us go up 10 - 3
We just did a great job of play-calling and
everybody came and we knew what we had to do
and we executed
Statistically, you guys have more explosive plays,
Unfortunately, you were plagued by turnovers
How are you guys thinking on improving those
going into next week?
You know going into practice I think we just
simplify things a little bit
we're getting back to the basics and
fundamentals of our game and
knowing what we're really good at, I think going into
this next week we're going to focus on
the things that we've been strong at through
the first four games and I think that's gonna help
us you know, minimize the turnovers
So I know you like to dance a lot and
celebrate your touchdowns
Can you teach me one of your favorite dance moves
or favorite touchdown moves?
Ok, I have a few
I have the wipe-me-down, which is just
you know, you just clean yourself off
Okay
I have the baseball swing, where you
throw a ball up and you hit it
and if you're feeling festive
you can give a little hip movement
I'm not gonna do that right now
Can you teach me? I mean, I need to know
I don't know, you can give a little hip movement or a dance
Hip movement?
You gotta just feel the touchdown dance
Okay, okay
It's like in the moment
Ok, let's try one together
I'm Isabella Marten
I'm Vic Enwere
This is CalTV, Go Bears!
-------------------------------------------
Here's My Canada: Be Who You Want to Be - Duration: 0:25.
it also means that everyone's polite,
kind,and welcoming, and that I'll be accepted regardless
of my race, religion, or culture, it also means that I have
no shortage of maple syrup,
hi, being Canadian means that you can be
do whatever you want, and you can have fun.
-------------------------------------------
How students are leading the fight for Catalonia - Duration: 4:43.
we are on the street in a really peaceful manner and this will continue
going until Sunday and what we want basically is to vote in the first of October.
There's people from all wings that are supporting the independence. The
pro-independence and the pro-referendum movement have always shown to be very
peaceful. We are we are being civically disobedient
but we are not being violent.
The important thing and what we are protesting against is the the repression
like the political repression we've been suffering lately. All the institutions
have been taken over by the central government, and their bank accounts have
been frozen, so for example the university's bank accounts have been
frozen. And also politicians and activists have been detained.
They don't come from a democratic tradition. Their negativity and their and their
and their hostility towards us is creating more and more support towards
independence. They shouldn't think that force will work to silence the people
that they should be representing. They have brought here in in Catalonia a huge
number of officers to control us and to and try to repress us in the one of
October.
We speak a different language. Historically the Spanish government has
been neglecting and mistreating Catalonia so people is really tired and
they just want to go out of here the reasons for independence are not
only nationalistic they're also socio-economic they have a lot of cases
of corruption and I don't believe in the in this government I don't believe in
Spain now. There's a 50 percent of youth unemployment and things like that so in
some way independence is for some people our way to start anew and to have a
second chance. Will we have now the opportunity of building a different
country. I will be happy if it's just and being like a real Republic a real social
democratic republic with real social politics. They just keep saying that the
referendum is anti-democratic because it's illegal, but that's that's the
opposite meaning of democracy. Democracy is the power of
the people to adapt a law to the will of the people, not the other way around.
Because what did what they what they want is to demonstrate they have power
over us, but I believe that they will not be able to stop us, because we are
millions. There are there are millions of people that want to vote. I'm worried
about what Spanish police forces are capable of to do. Honestly I don't think
it has to it's possible like a peaceful ending of this thing and it's quite sad
but it's the way it has become because they pushed up with so many cops in so
many repression when when you reach this point it's no coming back. Even if I'm
worried I'm super determined that we will vote. We are supposed to do
everything we can yes, we want the freedom of our people. We want democracy.
We want only to vote. We want to do it the referendum, only to not the crime.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét