Thứ Hai, 18 tháng 6, 2018

Waching daily Jun 18 2018

xiaoling' Visit World famous university&Stanford University | Xiaoling toys

For more infomation >> 小伶探訪世界名校之美國斯坦福大學!小伶玩具 | Xiaoling toys - Duration: 10:05.

-------------------------------------------

ARCANJO MIGUEL - O tempo vai acelerar mais ainda - Duration: 5:09.

For more infomation >> ARCANJO MIGUEL - O tempo vai acelerar mais ainda - Duration: 5:09.

-------------------------------------------

CORON TO EL NIDO PHILIPPINES JOURNEY (GOODBYE ROBYN!) - Duration: 8:00.

- Montenegro is the boat

that's gonna get us back to El Nido,

and at first glimpse we were both shocked

at how amazing this boat is.

(upbeat music)

- [Brad] Are you okay lifting that?

(Robyn speaking inaudibly)

That's some mighty guns you have there.

Alright, we're off to the port.

We're off to the port.

Alright everybody, it is the fourth of May 2018.

We're in a tricycle on our way to the port

here in Coron, Philippines to head back to El Nido

on a five hour fast boat back to El Nido.

And it's a super hot day.

Now unfortunately yesterday it was raining the whole day,

so we did nothing in Coron except meet

amazing people in the breakfast area.

So, it wasn't too unfortunate after all.

(upbeat music)

- [Brad] We're super early.

It's like 20 past 10 in the morning, but maybe catch a cafe

or something like that, check in, do whatever we have to do,

and then, yeah, look forward to the amazing

five hour boat ride ahead of us.

You sure you don't want me to take your suitcase?

- You're a good gentleman.

(speaking inaudibly)

- Evidence of me offering to take the suitcase.

Thank you.

- [Robyn] Thank you, gentleman.

- No, I changed my mind, you can take it.

(laughing)

- Such an idiot.

(laughing)

(ticket person speaking inaudibly)

- We have to pay a terminal fee before we leave.

20 pesos per person.

11:30, we're about to board the ferry back to El Nido.

Not looking forward to this five hour boat ride.

You're not looking forward to it.

Nobody else is, either.

(laughing)

Sh.

So, it's an overcast day.

Weather's changing again.

Unfortunately we never got to see

a lot of the beauty of Coron due to the rain

that we had yesterday.

Thunderstorms we had the night before last night,

and yeah, so we'll definitely come back to Coron,

maybe for a bit longer

so we can really check this place out.

There's some diving here,

there's a lot of good rec diving here apparently.

And there's always another day, another time.

Life is long, so I'm not too fussed.

Yeah.

It's been an amazing trip.

Here we go, on the boat we go.

Right there.

(upbeat music)

- Alright, quick update.

We just boarded Monte Negro.

Monte Negro is the boat

that's going to get us back to El Nido,

and at first glimpse, we were both shocked

at how amazing this boat is compared to the boat

that we caught to get from El Nido to Coron.

Check out this, first class.

With plants.

(laughing)

What do you think so far, first impressions of this boat?

- It's luxury.

This is amazing, I'm so happy right now.

Three or four hours, worse, I can do this.

- [Brad] Make sure you book Monte Negro.

- They even cushion, there are even cushions on the seats,

you know?

- [Brad] We never had that on our trip.

- It's comfort.

- We've never had that coming here, did we?

- [Robyn] No, no, no, didn't have none of that.

- Just real quick, check this out.

(upbeat music)

- Perfect, 4:30 in the afternoon,

we've just arrived back to El Nido from Coron, Philippians.

Don't really have much of a voice.

The air conditioning was terrible.

It was so cold in the cabin.

I've lost my voice, and everybody was freezing.

And so, so cold, and that's why I don't have a voice.

So yeah, I'll update you again.

(upbeat music)

Alright, we just arrived at our accommodations.

Stay here tonight, it's the final night here.

Back at Ashtock Homestead.

I have no voice thanks to the air conditioning on the boat.

- [Receptionist] Robyn.

- Robyn Whale.

- Robyn Whale.

- How was the boat ride?

- To be honest, it was kind of rough.

It wasn't rough, it was just fricking cold,

it was like ice cold, it was like riding an iceberg.

- It was freezing, freezing, freezing, freezing.

I told the guys, like, four times, can you turn the

- It's like so hot now, okay.

- Yeah.

- After being so cold.

- It's like being in a sauna now.

- Yeah, hot cold, hot cold.

- Yeah, it was crazy.

- It was very freezing, our voices.

- Voices.

- They are lost.

- Yeah, thanks to the air conditioning.

- It's awesome.

- Sounds like we've been to a massive.

- Upstairs?

- Sounds like we've been to a massive party,

but we didn't.

Anyway, stay tuned, we'll check in,

drop our stuff off, head back out into the town of El Nido.

So stay tuned!

(upbeat music)

- Hey everybody, how's it going?

Quick update for you.

Sorry about my voice.

(clears throat)

The air conditioning was terrible on the boat,

and that's why I don't have a voice.

(upbeat music)

- Alright everybody, quick update.

It is the, whatever day it is,

that I have flashed up on the screen.

Friday night.

And we're off to have dinner here in El Nido,

back in El Nido, I have no voice.

And this one's all dressed up.

Look at her, makeup, pretty eyes, look at her!

(laughing)

Do you have anything to say, Pretty Face?

- I'm hungry.

- She's hungry.

- I'm hungry.

- She's hungry.

- So hungry.

A pita and some Mexican, and some good conversation.

Looking forward to it.

- Me too, me too.

So we're back in El Nido tonight,

we'll go and get some Mexican.

I'll show you that, and I want to show you some of the menus

and stuff like that, and you can price, plan,

and whatever you do for travel.

Anyway you guys, stick around.

This is going to be fun.

Speak soon.

(upbeat music)

For more infomation >> CORON TO EL NIDO PHILIPPINES JOURNEY (GOODBYE ROBYN!) - Duration: 8:00.

-------------------------------------------

What would happen if all birds suddenly disappeared? - Duration: 2:46.

what would happen if all birds suddenly disappeared?

Ask Mao ze Dong he knows best!

During his crazy reign in the '60s & '70s, he had some brilliant ideas.

In addition to erasing Chinese culture

and to sacrificing big chunks of the population

he wiped out the sparrows of China.

During the Four Pests Campaign of 1958–1962,

the population was ordered to kill the following pests

mosquitoes, rodents, flies and sparrows.

The first three of them are somewhat reasonable

as they are carriers for really nasty diseases or plagues

The sparrows were hated, because they picked the seeds after the peasants had sown the fields.

Logically, killing all the sparrows equals higher yields, right?

Let's do it!

It is just an actor!

The people actually hunted the birds by all means

Peasants made a constant noise around trees, to prevent the small birds from landing

The exhausted sparrows just fell down to the ground, as they couldn't find safe places to rest.

It is estimated that 2 Billions of them died in a short time.

With the sudden extermination of the species, a never-seen problem arose.

Indeed, the sparrows were eating a part of the seeds

But, what they actually ate the most were insects – e.g., grasshoppers

After the peasants rid the sparrows overnight – a natural predator –, the number of grasshoppers exploded

Billions of them swarmed over the fields & destroyed whole harvests with their immense appetite.

The crops were bitterly needed during the Great Leap Forward.

and an estimated 30 million persons died

The Grasshoppers made things even worse and it took years to control this special pest.

Even today, the sparrow population hasn't completely recovered.

As you have seen

the vanishment of a single species may cause years of famine

and this is just an example of what happens when man tries to turn the environment in his favour

without taking into account every single detail.

We could list many other examples

For those who wish to do further investigations about this topic,

I suggest to take a look to the introduction of the rabbit in Australia and the 1931 Dust Bowl in america and the cloud seeding.

And what if mankind ceased to exist?

Answer in the comment section below.

That's all for today!

Bye!

For more infomation >> What would happen if all birds suddenly disappeared? - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

Vecinos | Luis imita a Frankie Rivers - Duration: 1:11.

For more infomation >> Vecinos | Luis imita a Frankie Rivers - Duration: 1:11.

-------------------------------------------

Halifax Garden Festival - My Halifax - Things To Do In Halifax, Nova Scotia - Duration: 5:29.

For more infomation >> Halifax Garden Festival - My Halifax - Things To Do In Halifax, Nova Scotia - Duration: 5:29.

-------------------------------------------

German Misunderstanding | Overwatch Comic Dub - Duration: 1:30.

Oh!

Angela!

I got you everything you asked for!

Reinhardt, you are my life savior!

Don't mention it!

Well, I'm gonna get this to your room then!

What?! No, no, I can do that myself-

I insist!

You patched me up so many times,

this is the least I can do!

Well... if you put it that way I can't really say no, can I?

Thank you so much!

WAIT A MINUTE!

See you later Angela <3

Oh... shit...

Ehm...Reinhardt?

I changed my mind...

In my room there's...erm, right now...

a giant mess...

Sorry :')

Eh...

I'm really sorry haha

BROTHEL?!?! A WHAT?

Angela!

I didn't know you run something like that in your room!

For more infomation >> German Misunderstanding | Overwatch Comic Dub - Duration: 1:30.

-------------------------------------------

Stupid driving mistakes 222 (June 2018 English subtitles) - Duration: 8:46.

Turkey

Tractor driver alive

Look! eh! too bad

Lyosha. Call the ambulance

The driver went to the world of spirits, because I disregarded seat belts

Sit in the car, and wait. I'll call the ambulance. OK

what a pity

what is the name of this highway? m5

And what is the name of our location?

Oh my God

an ambulance is always near the crash

the tractor driver must be drunk ..

the city of Serpukhov and the intersection, which is involved in almost every compilation, every week)

right-hand drive (for Toyota, not for a motorcycle)

song, "us in this city are two funny guys"

it's unbelievable! A unique Lada, which brakes rectilinearly!)

Where are you so hurry, poor fellow?

for example, as usual occurs emergency braking Lada

What? How did he do it?

Wow! he broke the tree with his bus?

conversation: I paid for the services, but they spoiled everything. And I must wait for three months to resolve the dispute?

yes!

pizdez! bliin!

in a monochrome city protest against the yellow color

Belarus

Humpty Dumpty!

who is guilty?

Ukraine

stunned, which is unkempt! quiet children

right now

the most poor-quality video in the history of this channel)

morning begin with acrobatic workout

oi! oi! oi! oi! we are safe? yes blyat

Holy bunny!

You did not put pressure on the gas? I started after you Yes?

I prepared for the start, and you already started

Yes, I looked at the traffic light. Well, let's start the race again

That dude probably already in hookah?

It's just 1:00 a.m., tomorrow is Monday. Well, yes, we must go home

what? on the green? Yes

only on green, not on yellow blyat. and then I hate suka these racers blyat

there is no yellow traffic light sometimes happens

on the green. but I have not worked launch control blyat

I have to start with the gas pedals. OK

the elderly lady went to heaven

at work or home watching football? the torment of choice

Caption: Video: safe house

girl on Renault

Ukraine

For more infomation >> Stupid driving mistakes 222 (June 2018 English subtitles) - Duration: 8:46.

-------------------------------------------

THE ULTRA STRONG GIRLS - SOCIETY OF VIRTUE - Duration: 2:08.

Lots of sugar! An exaggerated amount of spices

and everything nice...

These are the ingredients chosen to create the perfect little girls

But professor Anthony also added an extra ingredient to the mix

The element Z!

And that's how the Ultra Strong Girls were born

Sweetie, Fluffy and Sticky have dedicated their lives to...

Oh god...what is that??

What is this?? Diabetes! Morbid Obesity and apparently some weird tumors

Look at Fluffy! What's that name supposed to be sarcastic? What did you do??

Oh God...the size of her head

Her head is normal, the problem are the tumors around it

Kill me...please....

What did you add on us??

Uh sugar, spices and everything nice!

What is everything nice, exactly?

Uh, whipped cream, marshmallows and some honey...

...leftover pizza but that was still good, some fries, a can of coke a sundae

Two Big Macs and the element Z...

What is element Z ??

Cinnabon...

Are you out of your mind?? How much sugar did you put in that recipe? Not even a glass of water?

What scientist doesn't know o humans are basically made of water?

Oh my god! It wasn't supposed to be like this! I...I...

I'm not sure, but I think her blood is pure nutella

She's having a heart attack!

Oh, my chest!

Somebody call an ambulance!

And once again, the day was saved

by the emergency staff of the General Hospital of Megalopolisville

Who with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and a pacemaker,

managed to bring Sweety back to life to save the city

She only needs to wait for Fluffy's exams, that may indicate she has to amputate her left foot

because of diabetes and also the biopsy of Sticky, who is in a more delicate situation

For more infomation >> THE ULTRA STRONG GIRLS - SOCIETY OF VIRTUE - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

Avengers 4 Rumors And Spoilers That've Been Leaked So Far - Duration: 7:57.

Avengers: Infinity War directors Joe and Anthony Russo went out of their way to implore fans

and critics not to spoil the film's many twists.

So it's surprising that we've already learned a great deal about what might take place in

2019's Avengers 4.

While some potential spoilers are just rumors from questionable sources, others are slip-ups

from Marvel actors, or even appear in official Marvel publications.

Here's a look at all the Avengers 4 rumors and spoilers leaked so far.

Time travel

Leaked set photos from the filming of Avengers 4 have shown actors wearing some vintage outfits

- namely, their costumes from 2012's first Avengers film.

In fact, Marvel has even recreated sets from the film's epic Battle of New York sequence.

This has led many to speculate that Avengers 4 will involve time travel.

"Great Scott!"

And that makes sense.

We know from Avengers: Infinity War that Doctor Strange used the Time Stone to peer into possible

futures and set a kind of plan in motion - and we also know that in his own film, he used

the Time Stone's powers to reverse time and save the world.

Hey, they don't call him The Doctor for nothing!

Hawkeye will become Ronin

Thanks to leaked set photos showing Jeremy Renner wearing some black and gold boots under

his trenchcoat, it's been all but confirmed that Clint Barton will shed the Hawkeye moniker

and adopt the Ronin persona in Avengers 4, something he did in the comics back in 2007's

New Avengers #30.

Renner, of course, was infamously missing from Avengers: Infinity War, after his character

took a plea deal following the events of Captain America: Civil War in order to protect his

family.

Fans are speculating that when Thanos snapped his fingers, Hawkeye's wife and kids were

among the victims, leading him to return to action in his new, dark identity.

Tony Stark builds his own Infinity Gauntlet

The plot of Avengers: Infinity War contained so many shocks and surprises, nobody could

possibly have guessed them all.

Yet an anonymous user on the website 4chan came pretty darn close, correctly predicting

such specific details as the return of the Red Skull, and the fact that Thanos would

sacrifice Gamora to obtain the Soul Gem.

Some believe that the user must have inside sources, so people are paying close attention

to the mysterious user's latest batch of rumors for Avengers 4.

"Iron Man reassembles the Avengers and decides to build his own Infinity Gauntlet to undo

everything that Thanos did.

They recruit Ant-Man to help them travel through time and space using the Quantum Realm to

retrieve the Infinity Stones from different time periods.

Thanos finds out about their plans and becomes hellbent on stopping them.

The movie revolves around the relationship between Captain America and Iron Man."

This claim seems to be backed up by set photos showing Ant-Man alongside 2012-era Cap - or

is it possible the theory is simply based on the photos to begin with?

Hmm.

So what does Anonymous claim will happen with Stark's new Infinity Gauntlet?

Glad you asked…

Professor Hulk will wield the 'Stark Gauntlet'

One piece of promotional art for Avengers 4 has supposedly been leaked online.

Whether or not it's real is a matter of speculation, but a potentially interesting detail is the

portrayal of the Hulk, who is wearing clothes and looks almost human.

This supports fan theories that the internal battle between Hulk and Dr. Bruce Banner that

raged throughout Avengers: Infinity War will end up with the two personalities merging

to create Professor Hulk, a version of the character from the comics that combines Banner's

mind with Hulk's body.

And according to 4chan tipster Anonymous, Professor Hulk plays a vital role in Avengers

4.

"Hulk's subplot centers on Banner and Hulk finally merging to become Professor Hulk.

He is the one that ultimately wields the Stark Gauntlet against Thanos, losing his arm in

the process."

The death of Steve Rogers

The death of Steve Rogers has been rumored and anticipated for years.

Star Chris Evans has been forthcoming about the fact that his contract is up and he wants

to do other things.

Most fans expected Captain America to die during Captain America: Civil War, since that's

what happened in the comics.

So far, though, he's still going strong.

But many expect Steve Rogers to finally meet his end in Avengers 4, and the anonymous 4chan

spoiler claims to know how it's going to happen.

"At one point, Captain America and Thor fight Thanos.

Timeline alterations have restored Mjolnir, and Cap wields it against Thanos to allow

the others to escape, and is killed holding Thanos off."

These are just predictions and rumors at this stage, but the way Cap's arc has been going

seems to indicate that he's going to go out with some kind of grand sacrifice, and dying

in order to save half the universe certainly fits the bill.

Iron Man has a kid

Seeing as this Avengers 4 leak came directly from the mouth of Gwyneth Paltrow, it seems

almost certain that Tony Stark will be a daddy in Avengers 4.

In an interview for the official Avengers: Infinity War magazine, Paltrow revealed that

her character, Tony Stark's longtime love interest Pepper Potts, was destined to become

a mother.

"Pepper and Tony have had a real long journey together.

She obviously starts as his dutiful assistant, and then the relationship evolves, and now

this decade later they're married, and they have a child.

Their relationship has evolved in all of the ways that great romances evolve."

The first question raised here is, "How did this spoiler make it to print in an official

Marvel magazine?"

The second question is, "Does this mean there's going to be a time jump?"

Sure, the baby might be born at the end of Avengers 4 as a symbol of renewal and new

life - and if that happens, bet the house on the kid being named Steve in honor of Captain

America.

But it's also possible that Avengers 4 will start some years in the future, with Tony

and Pepper already parents.

If so, jumping back in time to change the past could carry devastating implications

for Tony: changing the timestream might save half the population of the universe, but at

the cost of erasing his own child from existence.

Group shot

In April, 2018, Winter Soldier actor Sebastian Stan accidentally dropped a spoiler for Avengers

4 when he revealed there was a scene featuring every character.

"There was one scene, I think, we had where everybody was there.

I can't really talk about that scene, but I knew it took them three months in planning

this scene to have everyone there.

You look around and you just saw everyone from Samuel L. Jackson to Michael Douglas

to Michelle Pfeiffer.

Everybody was there."

Stan wasn't the only one who mentioned filming this sequence, either, as Scarlett Johansson

mentioned it as well during an appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.

"I think in one particular scene, there's like thirty-two of us.

There's a lot.

There's so many of us, I don't even know who's a Marvel character and who's like, a crew

member."

Since there was no scene like this in Avengers: Infinity War, it must take place in Avengers

4.

And since Winter Soldier - and Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury - both died from Thanos's finger

snap in Infinity War, we have to wonder just how they manage to bring everyone together

at all.

Hmm!

Did Zoe Saldana spoil the title?

Marvel Studios head honcho made it clear early on that the title of Avengers 4 was a closely

guarded secret.

But that went out the window when Zoe Saldana seemed to accidentally reveal the title of

Avengers 4 on the red carpet, saying

"Infinity War is the first part, and we all have to go back for Gauntlet later this year."

James Gunn told Yahoo! that she simply had her wires crossed.

"It's not the title.

My guess is that Zoe just misspoke.

I'll talk to Zoe today, but I would imagine that is just Zoe misspeaking and saying Infinity

Gauntlet instead of Infinity War."

4chan's anonymous tipster indicated that this wasn't the case, though, writing,

"The title was Avengers: Infinity Gauntlet at one point, but it might be changed after

Zoe Saldana accidentally leaked it."

Back from the dead

The fact that Tom Holland's Spider-Man and Chadwick Boseman's Black Panther were wiped

out by Thanos despite both having sequels on the way pretty much confirmed that at least

some of the departed heroes will be brought back to life in Avengers 4.

Directors Joe and Anthony Russo have been doing their best to throw us off the scent

by implying that the mass deaths at the end of Infinity War are permanent, but it's hard

to keep up that pretense when many of the actors themselves are contradicting them.

For instance, Drax actor Dave Bautista said

"I got a lot of texts saying, 'I can't believe you're dead, your character is dead.

They were really like heartbroken and I was like, 'I'm gonna be in four, I'm gonna be

in Guardians 3.'

I don't know how they're bringing me back, yeah but somehow I'm going to make it because,

as far as I know, I am going to be in Guardians 3, so I have to be back."

And Zoe Saldana told E! Live From the Red Carpet that being sacrificed by her father

Thanos felt like a "see you later" rather than a true goodbye.

"I knew that we will have to all come back, at some point this fall, and finish up the

fourth installment of Avengers."

We can't wait to see how that finish plays out.

Thanks for watching!

Click the Looper icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> Avengers 4 Rumors And Spoilers That've Been Leaked So Far - Duration: 7:57.

-------------------------------------------

RUSSIANS REACT TO MEXICAN MUSIC | Molotov - Gimme Tha Power | REACTION - Duration: 5:15.

Now we're gonna react to Molotov - Gimme tha power

It means "give me the power" or "strenght"

Power and strenght

They've been to Russia, there's even a live video from Russia with this song

We've reacted to them before, remember? -I remember

The gringo song -I remember their name

It was a cartoon video

They broke something

It sounds like a balalayka

Dinero means money

I think this song is about the goverment

Political song

They were talking about police at the beginning

Maybe their police is corrupt

I wish we had Russian subtitles

Aren't cops gonna stop his car?

For driving drunk... do they check drivers?

I think he has a scar on his face

No, it's not a scar

He's showing some signs

Or maybe he's stretching after sitting in the car

No, he's getting arrested

They're taking him to the police station

I think he's just too drunk

He lost his mind... he woke up

"Where am I? What happened?"

What does "cabrones" mean?

Motherfuckers

Alright... they are surrounding him

Something is happening there

They're trying to harm him

Very strange video

We need to understand the lyrics

I think the car is gonna explode

Let's dance instead of running

Is it gonna explode? -YES

They were looking at the sun

The oil was leaking, so maybe the sun made it explode

Protests

No to the rich people! Just like in Russia

No, I think they want the power

Not money? -I don't know

Why do they need power? They should demand money

They want equality?

And justice

Protest song

Most of their songs are protests

I understand what they trying to say, but with Russian subtitles would be better

They're protesting -Yes, they want justice

It's the same in Russia

A small amount of rich people have 99% of all the money

And there are other people with just 1% of the money

It's the same everywhere

I don't know any country where everyone is equal and has the same amount of money

Inequality is everywhere

So I guess we understand the song

But guys please write in the comments the meaning of this video and song

Because it's hard to understand

But it's definitely something important

We want equality too. We want equality in our country too

We have too many poor people

And not many rich people but they have all the money

Like and subscribe, leave comments

And follow us on Instagram and Facebook

For more infomation >> RUSSIANS REACT TO MEXICAN MUSIC | Molotov - Gimme Tha Power | REACTION - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

SUSE e CLOUD - Diolinux Entrevista Gerald Pfeifer - Duration: 3:46.

For more infomation >> SUSE e CLOUD - Diolinux Entrevista Gerald Pfeifer - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

Preacher: 'Reunion in Angelville' Season 3 Premiere Official Sneak Peek - Duration: 1:29.

♪♪

♪♪

Hey.

♪♪

It's been a while.

♪♪

You're probably still pissed.

♪♪

I need transpoil.

My girlfriend...

I don't have much time.

♪♪

So you gonna help me or what?

♪♪

♪♪

[Laughs]

Ahh.

You can dress up like your daddy all you want, kid.

But you never looked more like your mama

than you do right now.

Lot to catch up on.

But for now, your lady's in trouble,

you need some transpoil, yeah?

Yeah.

I know just the place.

For more infomation >> Preacher: 'Reunion in Angelville' Season 3 Premiere Official Sneak Peek - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

Masterpiece Cakeshop ruling: When everything is a "sincere religious belief" - Duration: 12:17.

Hey everyone, Zinnia here.

Last week's Supreme Court ruling in favor of a homophobic Christian baker who refused

to sell wedding cakes to same-sex couples is very disappointing, and not for the reasons

you might think.

This wasn't a catastrophic blow against the LGBT community – instead, this is a

ruling so narrow that it almost seems evasive.

What it left in place isn't all that great, and what it does address is concerning.

First, the good: The court's opinion does recognize that such religious objections can

conceivably be outweighed by the need for LGBT citizens to be served equally in the

area of public commerce.

Quote:

"The Court's precedents make clear that the baker, in his capacity as the owner of

a business serving the public, might have his right to the free exercise of religion

limited by generally applicable laws."

Continued:

"And any decision in favor of the baker would have to be sufficiently constrained, lest

all purveyors of goods and services who object to gay marriages for moral and religious reasons

in effect be allowed to put up signs saying "no goods or services will be sold if they

will be used for gay marriages," something that would impose a serious stigma on gay

persons."

While this recognition is significant and very important, what little time is spent

on acknowledging LGBT people's rights in such scenarios gives the impression that this

is no more than lip service.

Merely acknowledging that religious beliefs must be weighed against the need for LGBT

people to be free from discrimination in an open market isn't particularly helpful given

that the court's opinion entirely neglected to offer any useful guidance as to how such

conflicts might be resolved.

Rather than engaging with the substantive issues of where religious objections must

end and LGBT rights begin, the court's opinion focused narrowly on the finding that the Colorado

Civil Rights Commission showed "clear and impermissible hostility" toward the "sincere

religious beliefs" of the homophobic Christian baker.

In documenting this "hostility", the court cited remarks on the Masterpiece Cakeshop

case from a member of the commission.

Quote:

"Freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination

throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the holocaust, whether it be—I

mean, we—we can list hundreds of situations where freedom of religion has been used to

justify discrimination.

And to me it is one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use to—to

use their religion to hurt others."

The court's opinion construed this statement as directly disparaging the baker's religious

beliefs, quote, "by describing it as despicable, and also by characterizing it as merely rhetorical

– something insubstantial and even insincere."

According to the court, stating that religious grounds had been used to justify atrocities

such as slavery and the holocaust, quote, "is inappropriate for a Commission charged

with the solemn responsibility of fair and neutral enforcement of Colorado's anti-discrimination

law".

This only raises further questions: Would the court not have overturned the lower court's

ruling had the commissioner not made these remarks?

Certainly officials will take this finding as cause to be more cautious in their language

going forward so as not to offend the court's delicate sensibilities.

But is there any way in which officials can point out that religion has been used to defend

the indefensible that wouldn't run afoul of the court's standards in this area?

What kind of language might the court take umbrage at next time?

Embedded in this standard is an assumption that religion functions as an unalloyed good

in society, and that government officials are obligated to act accordingly.

But how would the court expect officials to regard a case where, for example, a business

owner does forthrightly state that their faith entails the belief LGBT people should be routinely

deprived of any and all services that are available to others?

How could officials meaningfully address an instance where a religious business owner

openly admits that, on the basis of their religion, they believe that LGBT people should

be harmed?

An assumption of good faith is a starting point that can be disproven by later conduct;

it is not a perpetual mandate to be upheld even in the face of contrary evidence.

There are no grounds for conceiving of religious faith as universally well-intentioned and

compassionate – the desire to cause harm does not inherently fall outside the scope

of religious views.

Many conservative religious advocacy groups routinely call for disaffirming approaches

and conversion therapy for LGBT people, something which is known to be harmful.

Pastor Steven Anderson of Arizona's Faithful Word Baptist Church infamously made an intercessionary

prayer for President Obama to die of brain cancer, and also voiced the belief that gay

people should be executed by the state.

In what way can agents of the government address cases of religious belief clearly being used

as grounds to hurt others?

This is a significant issue given the court's tacit acknowledgment that some exercises of

religious belief by business owners could indeed place an unacceptable burden on LGBT

people's ability to participate as equals in the public sphere.

How can officials articulate that fact in a way which is acceptable to the court?

The failure to address the limits of free exercise of religion in the context of nondiscrimination

law is especially worrisome given just how broad the category of "sincere religious

beliefs" can be.

An extensive body of case law has established that "religious belief" can encompass

nearly anything, and the sincerity of such beliefs is something that courts may not question

too closely.

To get a sense of just how expansive "religious belief" can be, just look at labor law under

Title VII, which requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for the religious

beliefs and practices of employees.

Based on a 1965 ruling in which conscientious objectors sought an exemption from the draft,

the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's compliance manual states that a belief is

religious if it "occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled

by … God".

The manual notes that "religious belief" can consist of "beliefs that are new, uncommon,

not part of a formal church or sect, only subscribed to by a small number of people,

or that seem illogical or unreasonable to others".

"Religion" can also include "moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong

which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views".

What does this look like in practice?

Under these broad definitions of religion, veganism has been found to be a protected

religious belief in some cases.

Atheism has also been found to be a religion for these purposes.

A claimed "Universal Belief System" followed only by an employee and his mother was found

to be a religion.

Membership in the KKK is *not* considered a religious belief – however, membership

in the "World Church of the Creator", a white supremacist group which reads the

"White Man's Bible", is considered a religion.

In one case, an employer was found to have discriminated against an airline worker who

claimed that an accident on the job was unavoidable because of a dream his wife had.

This, too, was considered a religious belief.

What about the sincerity with which someone holds a religious belief?

This is an important question, because if someone does not actually hold a given belief,

then their free exercise of religion is not being burdened or constrained at all.

Courts do have a valid interest in judging the sincerity of a religious belief, given

that some individuals may dishonestly claim to have certain beliefs for the purpose of

receiving exemptions from the draft, gaining special accommodations in prison settings,

engaging in the illicit trade of endangered animal products, consuming illegal drugs,

and so on.

Courts may examine whether an individual's claims of religious belief may be motivated

not by genuine faith but by nonreligious interests, such as simply wanting to consume drugs or

engage in illicit trade of animal parts for its own sake.

They may also look at an individual's history of religious beliefs and practices, potentially

revealing whether this contradicts their current claims of belief or was adopted only after

the legal advantages of claiming a religious belief became apparent to them.

Yet there are very stringent limits on a court's ability to inquire into the sincerity with

which a religious belief is held.

Many legal scholars, as well as Supreme Court justices, believe that courts have no business

assessing the sincerity with which religious beliefs are held at all.

In her dissent in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg claimed there

is an "overriding interest" in "keeping the courts 'out of the business of evaluating'

... the sincerity with which an asserted religious belief is held".

As Nathan Chapman writes in the Washington Law Review, most scholars endorse Justice

Robert Jackson's dissent in United States v. Ballard, contending that it would be impossible

to judge the sincerity of a person's religious belief without in the process judging whether

their religious belief is plausible or empirically inaccurate.

The latter is considered universally impermissible under what's called the "no-orthodoxy

principle", and if judgment of the sincerity of belief is inseparable from judgment of

the validity of belief, then judgment of sincerity becomes impossible.

As an appeals court stated in a 2014 Title VII religious accommodations case:

"This court has cautioned that judicial inquiry into the sincerity of a person's religious

belief "must be handled with a light touch, or judicial shyness."

… "[E]xamin[ing] religious convictions any more deeply would stray into the realm

of religious inquiry, an area into which we are forbidden to tread."

… Indeed, "the sincerity of a plaintiff's engagement in a particular religious practice

is rarely challenged," and "claims of sincere religious belief in a particular practice

have been accepted on little more than the plaintiff's credible assertions."

One attorney in the area of labor law summarized this as follows:

"The bottom line: If an employee says something is a religious belief, it is."

All in all, nearly anything can be a "religious belief" under the law, and there can hardly

be said to be a high bar for claimants to demonstrate that these beliefs are "sincere".

The expansiveness of "sincere religious belief" only underscores just how wide-ranging

the potential conflict with nondiscrimination protections can be.

This conflict is hardly limited to the issue of finding a wedding cake.

What about children of same-sex parents who could experience mistreatment from school

faculty?

What about trans people who could be denied emergency medical care on the basis of a provider's

anti-trans religious views?

Since the court's ruling, already a state lawmaker in South Dakota has stated that business

owners should be permitted to engage in racial discrimination, and a teacher in Indiana has

claimed that his rights were violated by being required to call transgender students by their

name.

Nondiscrimination protections for the LGBT community can hardly be said to be protections

so long as they have a religious, moral, ethical, or "conscience-based" loophole big enough

for vegans, atheists, racists and dream-prophets to drive a truck through.

It's one thing to acknowledge that the conflict exists and can potentially be resolved in

favor of protecting LGBT people.

It's another to answer the more specific question: how?

That is the answer the court neglected to provide here.

I'm Zinnia Jones.

Thanks for watching, and remember to like, comment, subscribe, and support my work on

Patreon.

See you next time!

For more infomation >> Masterpiece Cakeshop ruling: When everything is a "sincere religious belief" - Duration: 12:17.

-------------------------------------------

Trump aides plan fresh immigration crackdowns before midterms - Duration: 7:17.

 Top aides to President Donald Trump are planning additional crackdowns on immigration before the November midterms, despite a growing backlash over the administration's move to separate migrant children from parents at the border

 Senior policy adviser Stephen Miller and a team of officials from the Justice Department, Department of Labor, Department of Homeland Security, and the Office of Management and Budget have been quietly meeting for months to find ways to use executive authority and under-the-radar rule changes to strengthen hard-line U

S. immigration policies, according to interviews with half a dozen current and former administration officials and Republicans close to the White House

 The goal for Miller and his team is to arm Trump with enough data and statistics by early September to show voters that he fulfilled his immigration promises — even without a physical border wall or any other congressional measure, said one Republican close to the White House

 Among the fresh ideas being circulated: tightening rules on student visas and exchange programs; limiting visas for temporary agricultural workers; making it harder for legal immigrants who have applied for any welfare programs to obtain residency; and collecting biometric data from visitors from certain countries

 Details of the ideas are still being worked out, said one White House official.  In one of the most closely watched plans under discussion, the Department of Homeland Security has proposed a new rule that former Obama administration officials and immigration advocates worry could be used as an end run around a 1997 court settlement that limits the length of time migrant children can be kept in government custody

 "Once you rescind that regulation, then you go back to being able to do whatever you want and the detention becomes the complete discretion of ICE," said Leon Fresco, former deputy assistant attorney general for the Office of Immigration Litigation at the Department of Justice

"That is where people think this is headed." Morning Score newsletter Your guide to the permanent campaign — weekday mornings, in your inbox

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time

 The president and his top aides have framed the family separation issue as something Democrats could end by signing onto Republican legislation addressing Trump's priorities, including funding the border wall — even though the separation moves are solely the outgrowth of a Department of Justice decision and not grounded in a particular law

 Miller, who was instrumental to Trump's early travel ban — which, like the border separations, triggered widespread public outrage and was put into effect without sufficient logistical planning — is among those who see the border crisis as a winning campaign issue

 "That is the fundamental political contrast and political debate that is unfolding right now," he said in an interview with Breitbart News published on May 24

"The Democratic Party is at grave risk of completely marginalizing itself from the American voters by continuing to lean into its absolutist anti-enforcement positions

"  And some in the Trump administration are not inclined to back down from any of its immigration policies because they've been planning them for more than a year, according to one White House official and a Republican close to the administration

Employment & Immigration 'Grim sight': Migrants await uncertain future at strained Border Patrol facility  On Jan

25, 2017, President Trump signed an executive order that called for the arrest and detention of people caught crossing the border illegally — a broad preview of the Department of Justice's April "zero-tolerance" decision to refer all border-crossers for federal prosecution, which has led to the separation of children from parents being sent into criminal courts

 Many of the ideas for enacting more aggressive immigration enforcement or tweaking old government rules originated with the White House's Domestic Policy Council, which Miller effectively runs

 Other participants in the effort include: John Walk, a lawyer in the White House counsel's office and Attorney General Jeff Sessions' son-in-law; Thomas Homan, the soon-to-retire head of ICE; Francis Cissna, director of U

S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Gene Hamilton, a former staffer to Sessions and ex-DHS official, who's now at the Department of Justice; and officials throughout the Department of Homeland Security

 In his Breitbart News interview in May, Miller specially called for closer examination of H1-B visas, which allow U

S. employers to hire foreign workers for certain specialized jobs.  The Office of Management and Budget is currently reviewing a proposal to make it harder for immigrants with visas to obtain permanent residency, including a green card, if they or their children have used government benefits such as Medicaid, food stamps or tax credits

Advocates fear this would keep people from seeking necessary help or medical attention

Defiant Trump refuses to back off migrant family separations  The Department of Homeland Security's list of proposed rules, released this spring, offers another roadmap for the coming changes

 In one interim final rule, DHS would expand and make permanent a pilot program that allows the agency to collect biometric data — such as fingerprints, photographs or retina scans — from certain foreigners at land ports and some airports and seaports: a move that alarms privacy advocates

 "At all of the agencies, there is a steady drip, drip of regulatory and policy changes," said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that favors lower levels of immigration

"It is clear that Congress is unlikely to help them in terms of legislative fixes and will probably not even give them much more money, so they are going to use the tools they have and address these problems

" Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét