>> ALEX: This Technicality episode is brought to you by brilliant.org.
*walks into frame*
I've got a question for you: what do you think of when you think of humanity's switch
to agriculture?
What do you think of when early humans switched from a hunting and gathering lifestyle, to
a farming lifestyle?
What about the people who existed before agriculture; what were they like?
I know what I think; I personally have always looked at the switch from hunting and gathering
to farming as the place in human history where we, well, got our act together, and started
modernizing.
The people before us, well, they were just savage hunter-gatherers.
In school, we're all taught that this Neolithic revolution, this switch to agriculture, was
one of the best things to happen to us because it allowed specialization and put us on track
for the big cities and the modern lifestyle we have today.
But what if I told you it was actually a disaster, and, in fact, a massive mistake.
Hey guys, I'm here, let's get technical.
You probably know who Jared Diamond is.
Or, at the very least, you've heard of his Pulitzer Prize winning book, Guns, Germs,
and Steel.
But we're not gonna talk about that today, we're gonna talk about this article, from
the May 1987 issue of Discover magazine.
Written by Diamond himself, it's titled The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human
Race, and, if you haven't guessed already, it's about agriculture.
In his book the Phenomenology of Spirit, German philosopher Georg Hegel argues that progress
is never linear, and while we may think of now as the epitome of human innovation, and
the past as simply primitive, we can learn a lot of lessons from the past that have been
lost in the modern day.
So, today, let's learns those lessons.
Let's discuss what Diamond argues we can learn from hunting and gathering that has
been lost in the modern day and see if it really IS the worst mistake in the history
of the human race.
*like Mario* LESAGO!
>> CLONE: Wait wait wait Alex there are clearly so many benefits to agriculture.
After adopting agriculture, people were just clearly better off.
>> ALEX: Really?
Why?
>> CLONE: They were healthier; they had a constant food supply.
>> ALEX: Ok, let's debunk that.
First, agrarians actually had more illnesses than hunter-gatherers.
The study of prehistoric diseases and afflictions is called paleopathology, and paleopathologists
study skeletons to learn more about the makeup ancient humans, as well as what illness inflicted
them.
This is George Armelagos, and he and his team at University of Massachusetts studied 800
Native American skeletons at Dickson Mounds, located at an intersection of the Spoon and
Illinois rivers.
They wanted to look for the changes in health that occurred when the Native Americans there
switched from hunting and gathering to farming corn in about 1150 CE.
What did they learn?
The farmers were riddled with problems.
There was an increase in degenerative conditions of the spine (signifying too much strenuous
physical labour), a four-times increase in iron-deficiency anemia, a three-times increase
in bone lesions (signifying a plethora of infectious diseases), and a 50% increase in
enamel defects (signifying malnutrition).
Second, life expectancy for hunter-gatherers was longer than agriculturalists.
Armelagos found that the life-expectancy at birth of the hunter-gatherers was around 26
years, however, after the switch to agriculture, it dropped to 19, or a decrease of over 25%.
And third, hunter-gatherers were taller than their farming counter parts.
Just like how we can use skeletons to determine health, we can also use them to determine
height.
When paleopathologists studied Greek and Turkish skeletons, they found that the average height
of the hunter-gatherers was 5' 9'' for men and 5' 5'' for women, however, upon taking
up agriculture, high crashed to 5' 3'' for men and 5' for women.
That's a half foot drop in men, and a 5 inch drop in women.
I will now demonstrate what that looks like
Average height, by the way, is a fairly good measure of overall health, since a variety
of health problems, notably malnutrition, have a pretty big impact on it.
And, of course, it's important to consider malnutrition when you're talking about,
well, systems of getting food.
>> CLONE: Ok, agriculture's bad for health, but why?
I live in an agricultural society, and I'm healthy.
>> ALEX: Come on.
Come on man.
Who are we kidding?
>> CLONE: yeah that's fair.
>> ALEX: This is not a joke, one day last week, I literally ate chocolate chip pancakes
for breakfast, chocolate chip pancakes, and pasta for dinner.
Soooo....
While that fact is incredibly depressing, it segues nicely into my next point: there
are three reasons why agriculture is bad health.
First, all of that starch.
With the rise of farming, we also saw the rise of starchy crops: wheat, rice, and corn.
That in and of itself isn't necessarily bad, but when that's the only or primary
thing you eat (say, if you were to live in a farming society that only or primarily makes
those foods), you miss out on many amino acids, vitamins, and nutrients that are incredibly
beneficial.
Why were starchy crops so dominant?
They were practical.
Not only were they easy to mass produce and had the most calories possible, they were
also easy to tax.
They weren't buried under ground like potatoes, which would be hard to tax because each individual
crop would have to be dug up and counted, and there was a consistent time when they
were ripe, unlike, say, legumes.
James C. Scott, political scientist, anthropologist, and author of Against the Grain: A Deep History
of the Earliest States calls grains, quote "visible, divisible, assessable, storable,
transportable, and 'ration-able'" and they were really the only crops with all of
those characteristics.
Perfect for taxation, my dudes.
Conversely, the diet of hunter-gatherers is incredibly diverse and healthy.
They've got a wide variety of wild plants and animals to eat.
A matter of fact, the Kalahari bushmen, modern-day hunter-gatherers, get 2,140 calories and 93
grams of protein daily.
When asked why the tribe didn't switch to farming, much like their neighbors, one bushman
said quote "Why should we, when there are so many mongongo nuts in the world?"
Second, if you're dependant on a certain crop, and that crop fails, you've got starvation
on your hands.
And we've seen this before; does the Irish Potato Famine ring a bell?
Third, agriculture encourages people to join together in big cities.
After all, you do wanna be where the food is, and big cities means diseases... and lots
of them... and them spreading very quickly... and death.
In a hunting and gathering society, epidemics couldn't find their footing.
After all, small tribes constantly moving around doesn't allow for diseases to spread
too easily.
However, once we saw the rise of farming, cities, and domesticated animals, we also
saw the rise of tuberculosis, measles, and the most infamous of them all, the bubonic
plague.
>> CLONE: But Alex, you have 0 iq, you're missing the point of agriculture:
it allows for specialization.
Not everyone has to find food, so people can spend time working on their life's passion
and contribute to society in all sorts of new amazing ways.
Not to mention, agriculture allows for leisure time, and the budding of art and culture and
humanity and anime!
And sure, health suffers a bit, and you've got more diseases, but that specialization
and anime makes it all worth it.
>> ALEX: How do you thinking hunting and gathering works?
>> CLONE: Well, you spend your days out in the world
hunting for meat and gathering for... uh, berries.
And then, at the end of your day, you come back and eat your rations.
You go to bed.
Do it again tomorrow.
You're all hunky dory.
>> ALEX: Hunter and gatherers actually spend less time per day hunting than you might think.
Howard Spodek, professor of history and geography at Temple University, wrote in his book The
World's History, that hunter-gatherers would only need to devote an average of 800-1,000
hours a year to hunting and gathering.
This is opposed to the 1,000-1,300 hours a year farmers spend farming.
Let's put that in perspective: 800-1,000 hours a year is around 2.2-2.75 hours a day.
To claim that you wouldn't have time for specialization in a hunting and gathering
society or specialization only exists under an agricultural system is simply incorrect.
Even if you want to stay confined to an 8 hour, a 9-5 work day, you would only spend
a third of your time actually getting food, while the other two thirds could be spent
on how you think you could best contribute to society.
Under a hunting and gathering society, people have plenty of time to specialize in whatever
area they desire.
Also, the claim that farming caused art and music and culture because it allowed for leisure
time is preposterous.
Those things existed before agriculture, usually in the form of painting and sculptures, and
there's no reason why the practice of those things are exclusive to an agrarian society.
Heck, anthropologists have found that hunter-gatherers spend MORE time on art and culture than agrarians.
>> CLONE: *with head back* EHHHH fine but at least at this point agriculture can't
get any worse.
>> ALEX: Actually, it can! *off screen clone* You shouldn't be so happy when saying that.
*like Walker* mOkay
With agriculture comes deep class divisions.
And we know this, right?
We've all seen the Bill Wurtz video.
>> History of Japan, 0:33-0:40
Bill's right.
Because agriculture has does have stored food and concentrated sources of food (like farms),
whoever controls that food, regardless of if they produce it (a matter of fact, they're
probably NOT the ones producing it), has all the power.
And this has negative effects on people in lower social classes.
Greek skeletons found at Mycenae, an archaeological site south-west of Athens, revealed that lower-class
people were two to three inches shorter than royals, and had an average of 6 cavities or
missing teeth, as opposed to the royals, who has only 1.
Chilean skeletons revealed lower classes had 4 times more bone lesions caused by disease
than royals.
Not to mention, with social classes comes oppression and slavery, something you can't
have if everyone has to collect food for themselves every day.
>> CLONE: Ok, but, Alex there's got to be some upside to agriculture.
Why did we even switch in the first place?
>> ALEX: Well, it's efficient and easy and we can make a ton of food and have massive
surpluses through farming.
We'll get more food in an acre of crops than in an acre of roots and bushes and berries.
As the population of early humans started to spike, they needed a system where they
could mass produce as much food as possible, regardless of the consequences.
So, what do I think?
Was agriculture the worst mistake in the history of the human race?
Ehh, probably not.
Agriculture does allow to have the massive populations we have today.
It allows us to have cities and a global society.
To say that agriculture is nothing but terrible is an over exaggeration.
>> OFF-SCREEN: Yeah you know what over-exaggeration is called on YouTube?
Clickbait.
>> ALEX: No, nooo.
This isn't clickbait, this is different.
Somehow.
For better or for worse, our ancestors, thousands of years ago, made this decision, which got
us to where we are today, and it's important to look critically at decisions our ancestors
made so we can find out more about who we are as a species and reflect upon and investigate
the choices we made in our past.
While agriculture does allow us to gain many benefits, it doesn't come without costs,
those costs being stuff like health, malnutrition, some free time, and class division, and investigating
those costs I think is really interesting.
I first read this article almost 2 years ago now, at the beginning of my freshman year
at high school.
I read it for my history class, my teacher Dan, shoutout to him, he's a great guy,
assigned it, and it stuck with me every since.
The article, and I know this sounds kinda cliche, made me question everything.
When I learned something I perceived as just a fundamentally great stepping stone in humanities,
something I'd been taught in school all my life was the point when humanity actually
started getting good, had disadvantages as well, it encouraged me to look critically
as things we've just accepted as fact and never stop seeking truth.
It's this principle of sparking questions that draws me to Brilliant.org.
By looking critically at what I'm learning, I'm asking the questions to truly understand
these concepts.
For example, quick question: how do you think refrigerators work?
I always thought it just this magical box of cool that would just pump cold air into
it and keep all of my food happy, healthy, and strong.
However, I learned that it actually works not but pumping cold air in, nor by pumping
hot air out, but by pumping heat out.
I learned that from the physics of the everyday course on brilliant.org, the best place to
learn how to think like a scientist.
They have tons of incredibly interesting courses that engage you in solving fascinating problems
and help you understanding concepts at a deeper level.
If you want to get access to those courses and more and help support the channel go to
brilliant.org/technicalityand sign up for FREE today.
Also if you go to that link, the first 200 people will get 20% off an annual premium
subscription.
This video is part of a collaboration I did with the channel Counter Arguments.
I made a video with him over on his channel debunking the myth that violent video games
cause mass shootings.
I'm a big fan of the channel, and I'm honoured I got to work with him, so if you
haven't checked it out yet, I recommend you do!
Click the i or the upcoming end card.
Also, I'm going to be at VidCon next week! I'm crazy excited, and, uh if you see me, feel free to come up and say hi.
Like I said in the video, this video is an adaptation of Jared Diamond's article the
Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race, which I'll leave in the description
along with all other sources, if you wanna check that out.
If you're new here, subscribe to see more, and liking and sharing the video helps and
means a lot.
Thank you to all my patrons at Patreon.com/Technicality, especially these awesome people, and, as always,
thanks for watching, DFTBA, and explore on.
For more infomation >> Dedalo Fx - MOD-5 Phaser pedal - Bass Demo - Duration: 2:51. 
For more infomation >> lets Play Android Mobile games - Duration: 2:28:12. 
For more infomation >> Kompilasi Lagu Batak Mantan Terindah | 6 Lagu Batak Mantan Terbaru 2018 - Duration: 27:43. 
For more infomation >> Sleeping Dogs: Nightmare in NorthPoint #2 - Đánh với cương thi | ND Gaming - Duration: 24:42. 
For more infomation >> Anti-police extremist invited to speak to Chicago students - Duration: 2:53. 
For more infomation >> Ronna McDaniel on midterm strategy, embracing Trump - Duration: 5:05. 
For more infomation >> Tucker: The Left does not care about family separation - Duration: 4:43. 
For more infomation >> 6月下旬橫財滾滾，大財小財齊發，3生肖買房又買車，再也不缺錢 - Duration: 5:18. 
For more infomation >> 六六大順！這幾個生肖端午節後有大財 - Duration: 3:12. 
For more infomation >> 6月20號起，3生肖睜眼見財，財旺事順貴人幫，人人都羨慕！ - Duration: 3:14. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét