US HOMELAND SECURITY CHIEF KIRSTJEN NIELSEN THE VERY PERSON
WHO HAS BEEN ENFORCING TRUMPS ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY WAS
ENJOYING AND I OUT AT A MEXICAN RESTAURANT, HAVING A LOVELY
DINNER.
THE METRO DC DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST SAW THAT SHE WAS
HAVING A LOVELY DINNER AND THEY DID WHAT I BELIEVE WAS THE
RIGHT THING TO DO.
THEY DISTURBED HER LOVELY DINNER AND SO THEY PROTESTED
TRUMPS ZERO TULLIS TOLERANCE POLICY AND WE HAVE SOME
VIDEO, LET'S TAKE A QUICK LOOK.
SECRETARY NIELSEN, HOW DARE YOU SPEND YOUR EVENING HERE EATING
DINNER AS YOU ARE COMPLICIT IN THE SEPARATION AND DEPORTATION
OF OVER 10,000 CHILDREN SEPARATED FROM THEIR PARENTS?
SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME!
AWESOME.
I AM TORN ON IT
I LOVE IT.
I GET THAT CIVILITY MADE SENSE IN A TIME WHERE POLITICS WAS
VERY DIFFERENT.
WE ARE IN A COMPLETED DIFFERENT WORLD NOW AND I AM DONE
PULLING PATTY CAKES WHILE, THE SHE IS OUT IN PUBLIC
ENJOYING A LOVELY DINNER WHILE PEOPLES, PEOPLE ARE
EXPERIENCING THEIR CHILDREN PRINT AWAY FROM THEM NOT
KNOWING WHEN THEY ARE GOING TO SEE THEM AGAIN.
NO, YOU DO NOT GET TO ENJOY A NICE, LOVELY DINNER AND
BEFORE I WOULD'VE SAID, IT IS NOT OKAY, DON'T HARASS
PEOPLE, I KNOW I WOULDN'T APPRECIATE IT, BUT I ALSO
WOULDN'T BE COMPLICIT OR ENFORCING THIS TYPE OF POLICY.
REMEMBER, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN WAS CONSIDERING QUITTING HER
JOB BECAUSE TRUMP IN A MEETING DECIDED TO TEAR HER APART
BECAUSE AT FIRST SHE REFUSED TO ENFORCE THIS POLICY AND
THEN SHE DECIDED I AM GOING TO TELL TALE AND DO IT EVEN
THOUGH I KNOW IT IS THE WRONG THING TO DO.
I LOVE THAT THEY PROTESTED THE WAY THAT THEY DID, SHE
DESERVED IT.
LET ME EXPLAIN WHY I AM CONFLICTED ON A DOT IN THE
OTHER IN ONE HAND, THE WORD CIVILITY IS USED IN
WASHINGTON TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ONLY AND THE ESTABLISHMENT ARE
NOT DISTURBED AND THEY CAN START WARS IN IRAQ AND KILL HUNDREDS
OF THOUSANDS OF NOT MILLIONS OF CIVILIANS, THAT IS FINE AS LONG
AS YOU ARE NOT UNCIVIL TO THE ESTABLISHMENT AND TO THEIR CLUB.
THEY CAN TAKE AWAY KIDS FROM THEIR PARENTS AND HEY,
THOSE PEOPLE ARE NOT IN OUR CLUB SO I TOTALLY GET THAT.
ON THE OTHER HAND, WE FEEL PASSIONATELY ABOUT THIS.
THE RIGHT WING FEEL PASSIONATELY ABOUT OTHER ISSUES AND IF WE ARE
CONSTANTLY YELLING AT ONE ANOTHER, IT IS GOING TO GET
UGLY AND IT'S GOING TO GET THERE SOON.
ON THE THIRD HANDS, THEY ARE ALREADY THERE, SO THE
QUESTION IS DO YOU STRIKE BACK OR DO YOU SIT THERE AND GET
RUN OVER IN CHARLOTTESVILLE?
AND IN OTHER PLACES WHERE THEY HAVE CHOSEN THAT PATH AND THEY
HAVE DONE IT OVER AND OVER AGAIN, PROJECT VERITAS THEN GOES
AND DOES DOCTORED TAPES, WHETHER IT IS IN THE ACORN SITUATION,
AND THEY CUT THAT SHUT THE WHOLE ORGANIZATION DOWN.
THEY USED TO HELP POOR PEOPLE GET HEALTHCARE AND LEGAL
SERVICES AND GET THE THINGS THEY NEED.
THEY ROBBED MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN AMERICA OF THAT AND THEY
DID IT IN UNDERHANDED WAYS, ETC.
I BELIEVE IN FIGHTING BACK SUPERHARD, BUT POLITICALLY.
WHEN BERNIE SANDERS IS PRESIDENT, THE RIGHT WING
WILL START ATTACKING THEM AT DINNER.
IT IS NOT AN EASY SITUATION, AND I THINK THAT WITHOUT GIVING INTO
THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA'S IDEA OF CIVILITY WHICH IS BOW YOUR HEAD,
DON'T DO ANYTHING WITH TO FIGHT BACK AND WITHOUT GIVING INTO
THE DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT IDEA OF PRETEND TO FIGHT THE
REPUBLICANS AND THEN SURRENDER AS SOON AS YOU POSSIBLY
CAN, I THINK THERE IS A WAY TO WALK THAT LINE WITHOUT GETTING
INTO PHYSICAL CONFRONTATIONS AND THIS GOT TO THE EDGE OF THAT.
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN PHYSICAL ALTERCATIONS, LET ME BE
CLEAR ABOUT THAT.
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN PUTTING YOUR HANDS ON ANYONE.
WITH THAT SAID, THE LEFT HAS BEEN ENGAGED IN WHAT THEY
BELIEVE IS A COMMUNITY COLLEGE SPEECH AND DEBATE TOURNAMENT,
WHEN THE RIGHT WING HAS BEEN PUNCHING PEOPLE IN THE FACE.
THEY ARE IN AN MMA MATCH, SO I AM DONE WITH PAY PLAYING
PATTYCAKE.
WE NEED TO BUY BACK POLITICALLY.
YES WE DO, WE NEED TO ORGANIZE AND DO A BETTER JOB WITH
ALL OF THAT, BUT I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THE TRUMPET
MINISTRATION TO UNDERSTAND THAT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BE
ABLE TO DESTROY PEOPLE'S LIVES LIKE THIS AND THEN LIVE THIS
COMFORTABLE CUSHION LIFE WITHOUT FEAR OF PEOPLE STRIKING BACK.
LET ME ADD MORE TO WHY I UNDERSTAND AND APPRECIATE
THAT FRUSTRATION.
IF YOU CAME TO KIRSTJEN NIELSEN'S KIDS AS PETER
FONDA SUGGESTED TODAY AND TOOK THEM AWAY FROM HER, THE
WHOLE WORLD WOULD EXPLODE.
THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WOULD SAY WHAT HAVE YOU DONE, YOU
TOUCH HER KIDS, ARE YOU INSANE AND THEY WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY
RIGHT, BUT WE ARE DOING THAT THE PEOPLE, THEY JUST DON'T HAVE
POWER AND TO BE FAIR, THE MEDIA HAS BEEN COVERING THAT WELL.
THEY REALLY HAVE.
SO I GET THAT THERE IS A POWER DYNAMIC HERE THAT IS NOT ON
AN EQUAL FOOTING SO IF YOU DO SOMETHING LIKE DISTURB
SOMEONE'S DINNER WHEN THEY ARE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT,
PEOPLE GET VERY UPSET.
YOU TAKE AWAY PEOPLE'S KIDS, IT CERTAINLY DOESN'T HAVE THE
SAME EFFECT.
IN THIS CASE, AGAIN, IT IS KIND OF AN UNUSUAL EXAMPLE
BECAUSE THE MEDIA DID COVER IT A LOT, SEE YOU CANNOT SAY
THAT THEY WERE OUTRAGED BY IT.
THEY WERE BUT I CAN GIVE YOU MANY OTHER INSTANCES, KIDS
BEING KILLED ON THE GAZA STRIP WHERE IT IS NO BIG DEAL AT ALL.
THE MEDIA HAS BEEN EXTREMELY COMPLICIT IN THAT AND ALSO,
DRONE STRIKES AND OUR INVOLVEMENT IN YEMEN AND I
MENTIONED THE DRONE STRIKES NOT JUST UNDER THE TRUMP
ADMINISTRATION BUT ALSO UNDER THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION
AND HOW LITTLE PLAYÖ IT WASN'T EVEN ON ANYONE'S RADAR.
BUT THERE IS STILL AN IMBALANCE IN A COUPLE OF WAYS.
IF YOU SAID, HEY, THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, WHEN THEY DID
THE SIGNATURE STRIKES AND THEY KILLED INNOCENT CIVILIANS, THEY
SHOULD BE LAMBASTED FOR THAT, THE PRESS WOULD BE LIKE
POLICE BUT IF YOU YELLED AT MICHELLE OBAMA WHEN SHE IS
HAVING DINNER, THE PRESS WOULD BE WAY MORE OUTRAGED.
LET'S KEEP IT REAL, THEY WOULD.
IT IS A TOUGH ISSUE.
I WOULD BE OUTRAGED, I'M GOING TO BE HONEST WITH
YOU, I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD BE OUTRAGED, THAT IS A STRONG WORD.
I WOULD DEFINITELY RAISE AN EYEBROW IF PEOPLE WERE ATTACKING
MELANIA TRUMP IN THIS WAY BECAUSE LOOK, I GET IT, SHE
TWEETED SOMETHING THAT IS INCREDIBLY TONE DEAF AND I
GET THAT, BUT SHE IS NOT IMPLEMENTING CRUEL POLICY.
THAT IS WHAT KIRSTJEN NIELSEN IS DOING.
SHE IS SPINELESS.
SEMI-ARGUE, WHAT IS SHE SUPPOSED TO DO?
TRUMP IS THE PRESIDENT, THIS WAS HER POSITION.
SHE WAS GOING TO QUIT BUT SHE DIDN'T WANT TO.
SHE HAD A CHOICE TO MAKE THEIR DOCTOR ON THAT, I 100%
AGREE WITH YOU.
SHE IS NOT AN INNOCENT BYSTANDER.
SHE IS THE ONE EXECUTING THESE DECISIONS AS THE HEAD OF
HOMELAND SECURITY AND SHE MADE THAT DECISION.
WHY DID SHE DO A?
FOR POWER AND PRIVILEGE.
I AM NOT CONFUSED ABOUT THAT AND FINALLY, I WILL ADD ONE
LAST THING.
THE DINNER THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISTURBED BUT WAS NOT AND
BY DISTURBED, I DO NOT MEAN PHYSICALLY BUT IN TERMS OF
SIGNIFICANT PROTEST, IS THE ONE THAT TRUMP WAS HAVING ON
TUESDAY NIGHT.
HE ATTENDED A FUNDRAISER.
IN ORDER TO ATTEND THAT FUNDRAISER, YOU HAD TO GIVE
HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS PER PERSON.
HE IS GOING TO DRAIN THE SWAMP.
A HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS PER PERSON TO ATTEND THE DINNER.
THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF CORRUPTION.
THEY ARE LITERALLY SITTING THERE IN PLAIN SIGHT BRIBING HIM
AND WE ALL GO, IT IS A CAMPAIGN DONATION, IT IS FINE.
THERE IS NO APPEARANCE OF CORRUPTION.
THE REASON WE HAVE ALL OF THESE HIDEOUS POLICIES IN THE
FIRST PLACE IS BECAUSE ALL OF OUR POLITICIANS HAVE BEEN
BOUGHT AND THEY ARE BUYING THEM RIGHT IN FRONT OF US.
THOSE OF THE FUNDRAISERS WE SHOULD FIND AND THOSE ARE THE
ONES THAT SHOULD HAVE MASSIVE PROTESTS, POLITICAL PROTESTS ALL
OVER THEM AND IF THE GUYS IN TUXES WHO PAID $100,000
APIECE TO BRIBE OUR POLITICIANS ARE DISTURBED, THAT IS A
DISTURBANCE THAT I WOULD BE MASSIVELY IN FAVOR OF, AS
LONG AS YOU KEEP IT NONPHYSICAL AND PURELY POLITICAL.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét