Lullabies For Baby Sleep
8 Foods You Should Never Eat If You Have Joint Pain | Avoid These 10 Foods to Avoid Worse Joint Pain
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
-------------------------------------------
Ask Jase: Thongs 'n' Snakes, Winches & Volvos ► All 4 Adventure TV - Duration: 6:45.
G'day, guys. It's Jase here again.
We've got some more questions to answer, because everybody keeps emailing questions in.
Questions, questions, questions, about everything and anything.
We've got one here from Brian.
G'day, Brian, if you're watching.
'Aren't you guys worried about snakes just wearing thongs?
I cringe every time I see you guys in the scrub.
PS. Great, great adventure show.'
All right, thank you, Brian.
Thongs, well I tell you what, I've been wearing thongs as long as I can remember.
And I've been wearing thongs in that whole sort of boating/bush environment since I was
like a teenager.
And am I worried about snakes?
Well I'll tell you what, I suppose I'm a little bit careful, yes, but I'm more worried about
stumping my toe than getting a snake chew on my, you know, bite me.
Because I'm so comfortable in a pair of thongs, and you'll notice on the show, climbing mountains,
walking across slippery rocks, you name it, I've got the right pair of thongs as well.
I know that those other ones with the print on them and stuff like that, like the surf
thongs and stuff... mate, they get wet, they get slippery as hell.
That's why I've got the All 4 Adventure thongs, because they are really good in the bush.
So am I worried about snakes?
Always, but I feel comfortable in pair of thongs.
I don't wear boots, because next thing you know, you've got to get out, walk across the water.
Painful isn't it? It's easy just in a pair of thongs.
Bare feet, thongs, it's simple.
There you go, mate. There you go, Brian.
Let's have a look here. We've got some other stuff here.
Oh I tell you what we get a lot of is we get a lot of people emailing in going
'oh can I have a job?'
'Can I come along on your next trip?'
I've got Luke here who's like, 'how do I get on the show in a cameo appearance?'
I've got Hayden. Hayden's like, 'I'd like to apply for a job, boys. Anyone's dream job!'
And then Luke, 'Hey guys, how do I get to come along with you guys?'
Now that is a very, very common question.
How do you get to come along?
That's a tough one.
You know, when we're out in the field, it's a job.
And as much as I tell people this--it's a job--they just look at me and go,
'Yeah right, Jase. Yeah whatever, you're not convincing me it's a job.'
Well look, it is a job, but it's the best bloody job in the world, I reckon.
So everyone tells me. So I'm only listening to them.
So how do I get to come along?
Look you never know, there might be one day, we're out in the bush and we come across,
you know, you might be on your adventure.
And we come along and there you are.
And that's how you get a cameo appearance.
There's an option.
So get out into the bush and follow the tracks and up north and all those areas that we go to.
So you might run into us. Okay so there's some ideas for you.
What else have we got here?
Oh here we go. Here's a good one. Darren.
He goes here, 'Jase, why is the EFS winch 13,000 pound and not 12,000 pound like everyone else's?'
Oh okay, well I'll tell you what, 13,000 pounds... you're out in the bush, right?
Simon's cut across.
He's taken the wrong line.
Boom, bogged to the eyeballs, and he's got to pull the winch out.
If you've got a 13,000-pound winch as opposed to a 12,000-pound, don't you go, 'oh geez,
I'm glad I've got my 13,000-pound.
Extra thousand pounds of pulling power.'
Yeah look, they've been able to design the winch to a point where it's got 13,000 pounds.
So the motor's got more grunt.
The gearing is better, and it's just a tougher winch.
So there you go.
That's why it's a 13,000 pounder.
An extra thousand pounds.
What do they say?
You get an extra thousand pounds for the same price as a 12,000 pounder.
I don't know.
That's just a sales pitch that I've just come up with.
So there you go, Darren, thanks for that, mate.
Alrighty we've got a funny one here.
I know whether Bas thinks it's funny or not... but Bas from the Netherlands, would you believe?
And old Bas goes, 'Sorry guys, I won't follow you anymore.'
Okay, that's a bit sad, Bas.
'You really are awesome.'
Okay...
'But since you destroyed my favorite dream car, the Volvo xc90, which I cannot buy because
of money issues.'
Sorry to hear that, Bas.
'It really hurts to see how it got sinked.'
I've got to wear my seatbelt for this one.
That was Simon, not me, Bas.
'Yes, an XC90 is my dream car.
I like Volvo a lot.
Take care, Baz.'
Okay, I'm not sure whether Bas is serious or not, because... dream car xc90, hmm.
Now a lot of people are saying, I had a few emails.
You wouldn't believe this, but I actually had a few emails of people complaining because
we destroyed a perfectly good car.
Well I don't know about you, but the camera, I think the camera was must have rubbed some
Vaseline in front of the lens or something, you know, and made it a bit smudged.
Because that car wasn't that good a condition, trust me.
It copped a flogging over the years from mum, and she drove that thing into the ground.
So when Simon got hold of it, it wasn't actually that much left of it.
But anyway, sorry Bas. We've destroyed your dream car.
There's not much I can do about that, but again, it wasn't me. It was Simon.
Alright guys, so that's it for this week.
Keep your questions rolling in, and maybe you never know, you might be able to ask me
a question when we're out on the beaten track up north some time.
-------------------------------------------
[ Bảo Hoàng - Bến Thượng Hải] Mẫu Đệ Tam Thoải Phủ và tiểu nữ - Trà My Vũ - Mùa hoa bách hợp - Duration: 4:32.
One day, the little girl ask Mother of goodness:
- Please give me no longer endure all the suffering.
- No. Not because of me,
it's you must know how to avoid that pain.
- Please give my disabled children is complete.
- No. chirldren's spirit is because of himseft.
- Oh? Yes...
His body only is surface.
- Please give me more patience.
- No. It's from endure suffering,
- Oh!
- Can't give.
- Yes
- It's learning and take away.
- So happiness, Master ?
- No. Happiness or not is depends on you.
- Master, please give me everything to enjoy life.
- No. God has given you a life for you have everything.
- Please give me the lovingness ...
as your love with me....
- Finally, you was understood what I mean.
- Yes ! Thank you , master....
-------------------------------------------
WEIRD JOBS WE GOT PAID TO DO #3 | Dolan True Stories - Duration: 7:27.
– From getting feet sniffed to screaming in the middle of a food court, the Planet
Dolan Crew re-enacts some of the best true stories from our subreddit about the weirdest
jobs we've been paid for.
I'm Hellbent/Melissa, and today, I'll be your narrator.
Number 9 was Submitted by PicklesTickle91 Doopie
Doopie was just walking down the street when some strange guy stopped her.
He said that his local strip club shut down, and he loved going to the place for the bare
feet.
That was already an odd way to start a conversation, but THEN he said he couldn't help but notice
Doopie's "hot toes" in the sandals she was wearing.
The man offered Doopie ten dollars to let him sniff her feet for thirty seconds.
Doopie said no, but he begged and offered fifty dollars.
Doopie said she wanted sixty, and it was a deal.
She walked away sixty dollars richer.
Number 8 was Submitted by Kinky_shima_14 Snewpee The weirdest job Snewpee got paid to do was
to wear latex suits for bondage photo shoots.
Snewpee was tied up and dressed in different suits, while pictures were taken of her.
Some shoots had her with gags in her mouth, which was fine because she got more money
the kinkier the shoots were.
The kinkiest it got was being in a latex straight jacket, wearing a human muzzle, and making
various sexy poses.
After the whole experience, Snewpee walked away with 575 dollars.
Number 7 was Submitted by kittycool101 Pandora When a nearby nursing care home wanted some
people to help out, Pandora signed up.
The job entailed taking care of people in the home with cooking, cleaning, and organizing
activities.
The problem was the cleaning part.
By "cleaning," they didn't just mean the rooms.
They meant the actual residents themselves, who weren't able to clean themselves properly.
One old guy asked Pandora to wash 'the place' for him about 5 times.
She never went back after that, and she hasn't been able to look at old people the same way
since – not even her Nan.
Number 6 was Submitted by megadeathmeme21 SaltySquid
The weirdest job that SaltySquid was asked to do is cover his friend's shift at a gay
strip club.
He gave SaltySquid 150 dollars to do it, but he also got paid from the actual club itself.
So in a night's work, he made a total of 487 dollars.
Also, while he was working, someone at the club pointed out his "equipment" was longer
than his friend.
Number 5 was Submitted by Mote-of-Lobross Dolan
Dolan's first paying job ever was during his sophomore year of high school.
He worked for about a week and a half at a company that manufactured and installed doors.
His role was just as general help that did odd jobs around the office.
One day, Dolan was told to go into the storeroom and stack the leftover boards from installation
jobs that were thrown in there at random.
So Dolan turned a heaping mountain of boards into a nice efficient stack before continuing
on with other odd jobs around the office.
The next day, Dolan's boss said he stacked it wrong and had him re-do it.
So he made another, even more efficient stack of boards.
Dolan's boss angrily told him he did it wrong again.
Dolan finally asked, "So how many other ways are there to stack boards?
Maybe you can draw me a diagram or something?"
This was an honest request, and Dolan wasn't trying to be a smartass at all.
He just wanted to know how his boss wanted the boards stacked.
He still got fired over it.
And to this day, he never figured out what the hell he actually did wrong.
Number 4 was Submitted by that_dude1234 Grgak/MKyleM One time in high school, Grgak was eating
at a food court when his friend MKyleM came up and asked, "Do you want to go to the middle
of the food court in a Goku outfit and scream like a Super Saiyan for 200 dollars?"
Grgak wanted a couple of new video games, so he said sure, got changed and went to the
middle of the food court.
He started screaming, and people started to look at him.
He stood there and screamed for about a full minute until he was kicked out.
MKyleM was laughing his ass off while giving Grgak his 200 bucks.
Afterwards, Grgak went to Gamestop and got his new games.
Number 3 was Submitted by SpooperSenshi Emojie When Emojie was a teenager, her father paid
her 20 dollars a week to call him on Sunday.
Emojie's father was abusive towards her and her mom, so they separated when she was
two.
But he was still so determined to talk to her that he was willing to bribe her.
Emojie was happy to take the bribe for a while, but eventually the emotional toll wasn't
worth it, and she stopped taking the calls – and the money.
Number 2 was Submitted by joker_doom_ace Nixxiom Nixxiom got paid 200 dollars to follow a group
of college friends around and go bar hopping on a Saturday night.
At first, Nixxiom thought they wanted him to be a designated driver, but that wasn't
it at all.
They wanted an older person to hang out with them and have fancy drinks to make them look
more sophisticated or something.
Nixxiom didn't really get it, but they paid him 200 bucks and bought him drinks.
So he had no complaints.
Number 1 – What's the weirdest job I ever
got
paid for?
-------------------------------------------
3€ Pizza und Berlins bester Thrift Shop | VLOG 3 - Duration: 7:20.
What's up boy, whatcha doing?
Hello we are on our way to Berlin.
We got picked up at Weinheim and our driver is a very nice guy
Some other dude that's in the car with us is also a good companion.
We've got a plenty of space in the car is huge.
It's planned that we arrive in Berlin around 12 AM.
From there we're going to sleep at a friends house, Stella, who's pretty cool btw...
and yeah, let's see what we're up to tomorrow.
-------------------------------------------
Closing Sales: "Client Closing Ratio Doubled" | HTC Testimonial - Duration: 4:27.
For more infomation >> Closing Sales: "Client Closing Ratio Doubled" | HTC Testimonial - Duration: 4:27. -------------------------------------------
Encontrados - Jaus Da Haz x TrapHitmaker - Duration: 3:34.
For more infomation >> Encontrados - Jaus Da Haz x TrapHitmaker - Duration: 3:34. -------------------------------------------
PRAHOK TV - វគ្គក្តៅសាច់ ឃ្លានប្រហុកទេ (KHLEAN PRAHOK) Khmer Comedy 2018 - Duration: 6:38.
Bong, what took so long?
Almost done babe, wait a bit!
Fast fast!
Oun ah, who knocks the door, you can go and check?
I'm going.
Who are you looking for?
You see 1200$ in my hand? If you drop your towel off, you'll get these money.
Who was that honey?
Our neighbor..!
Oh, did he say anything about 1200$ that he owes me? Wife: huh?
He owes me 1200$.
Boss boss boss boss,
What? Anything?
hey hey
Wait a little bit bong, wait little bit.
Boss, I'm curious why I can't take day off when my leg is hurtle that? I'm working everyday boss.
What's going on?
I'm so curious about you, what do you want from me boss?
I just want to know what's going on now?
Nothing's going on boss! Just curious.
hey listen to me
Boss, I work everyday and you never help me when I need, never raise my salary. Now stop talking, I quit today.
bong, you look so cool! Your skin is so white and smooth.
How you do it?
You want to look cool, work out!
But look at you, no girl will love you.
You look down on me? I have a girlfriend, she's so beautiful. I have pictures, I'll show you.
oh
let me see!
See? We even kiss each other.
-------------------------------------------
Science is BROKEN, and the peer review process produces "utter - Duration: 25:19.
Science is BROKEN, and
the peer-review process produces �utter bulls##t� parading around as real science
by: Mike Adams
Much of what gets published in so-called �science journals� or �medical journals� is actually
complete �bulls##t,� warn many observers. Brendan D. Murphy has authored a spectacular
piece published by Waking Times, offering astonishing details in support of that notion.
His full article is reprinted here. Find the original at this link. See more work by Brendan
Murphy at BrendanMurphy.net.
WHY SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEW IS A SHAM In recent years the defects in the peer review
system have been the subject of a profusion of critical editorials and studies in the
literature. It is high time that the world took heed of what the critics are saying,
not least of all because of the medical and health ramifications.
The notion of peer review has long occupied special territory in the world of science.
However, investigation of suppressed innovations, inventions, treatments, cures, and so on,
rapidly reveals that the peer review system is arguably better at one thing above all
others: censorship. This can mean censorship of everything from contrarian viewpoints to
innovations that render favored dogmas, products, or services obsolete (economic threats).
The problem is endemic, as many scientists have learned the hard way.
In truth, the systemic failure of peer review is one of science�s major, embarrassing
open secrets.
As Dr David Kaplan tells us, �[P]eer review is known to engender bias, incompetence, excessive
expense, ineffectiveness, and corruption. A surfeit of publications has documented the
deficiencies of this system.�[1]
Australian physicist Brian Martin elaborates in his excellent article Strategies for Dissenting
Scientists:
Certain sorts of innovation are welcome in science, when they fall within established
frameworks and do not threaten vested interests. But aside from this sort of routine innovation,
science has many similarities to systems of dogma. Dissenters are not welcome. They are
ignored, rejected, and sometimes attacked.[2]
Electric universe researcher and Big Bang critic Wal Thornhill (a REAL scientist) stated
plainly in our GFM Media interview that the peer review system amounts to censorship.
Fellow independent scientist Gary Novak agrees scathingly:
�Peer review is a form of censorship, which is tyranny over the mind. Censorship does
not purify; it corrupts�There is a lot of junk science and trash that goes through the
peer review process.�[3]
Brian Martin asks us rhetorically:
What do [scientists] have to gain by spending time helping an outsider? Most likely, the
alleged discovery will turn out to be pointless or wrong from the standard point of view.
If the outsider has made a genuine discovery, that means the outsider would win rewards
at the expense of those already in the field who have invested years of effort in the conventional
ideas.[4]
Herein lies the problem in moving science forward and shifting paradigms. A paradigm
is only as malleable (or mutable) as the minds and egos invested in it.
The Problem of �Experts� The reality is (as any real scientist will
tell you) that scientists are prone?�?just like lay people?�?to being cathected to
their pet theories and opinions, especially if they have been visibly rewarded or publicly
obtained accolades or financial remuneration as a result. Scientists, like laypeople, have
susceptible emotional bodies and often fairly hefty egos?�?partially due to their �expertise�
and academic titles, qualifications, theories, etc.
Once those hefty egos?�?belonging to people generally known as �experts�?�?rise
to positions of power and/or influence, they can calcify the flow of scientific progress
as well as the understanding of new discoveries or theories?�?particularly if they end up
acting as �peer reviewers� at high levels in prestigious publications. In that capacity,
too many become mere gatekeepers and seek not to facilitate innovation or vital new
Copernican-scale revelations, but to maintain the status quo which got them there in the
first place.
Dr Malcolm Kendrick comments in his excellent book Doctoring Data that, �by definition,
anyone who is an �expert� in an area of medicine will be a supporter of whatever dogma
holds sway.�[5]Close study of power dynamics in medicine bears this out. The players with
the deepest pockets have the funds to buy all of the �experts� they need to sell
a bogus product or ideology to an unsuspecting public.
Consider the following words from The Lancet�s editor Richard Horton (pictured below):
The mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer review was any more than a crude
means of discovering the acceptability?�?not the validity?�?of a new finding�We portray
peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most
objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable,
incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and
frequently wrong.[6] (emphasis added)
The Lancet�s editor Richard Horton
Peer review, as a �quasi-sacred� process that somehow supposedly transcends the foibles
and follies human nature has taken on sacred ritual status. Has the paper been blessed
by the Peer Review Priest? Peer review is held to be more than just pragmatically useful
and functional (which clearly it is not, generally speaking)?�?it is held as a transcendent,
almost magical, organizing force occurring in the heavenly ivory towers of Science, which
somehow avoids falling prey to human weaknesses by virtue of those humans� lofty qualifications
as �scientists� or �experts.�
Scientists, of course, aren�t quite human?�?they are something more, something pure, something
that the layman can never be. Students undergo a magical alchemical process as they proceed
through educational institutions and emerge transformed from their chrysalis with their
doctorates, masters, stethoscopes and equations. They are the Chosen Ones, the purified, the
holy, the redeemed, the righteous. They do not have to answer to the lowly non-scientific
peasantry � let alone unbelieving heretics.
It is clear, however, that not only is the popular view of peer review misleading, but
the most prestigious publications are some of the very worst offenders. Significant scientific
publications?�?for example, the journal Nature?�?have a well documented history
of prejudice against findings or hypotheses that run contrary to established scientific
dogma.
Writing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) in May 2000, Canadian-based researcher, David
Sackett, said that he would �never again lecture, write, or referee anything to do
with evidence based clinical practice,� over his concern that �experts� are stifling
new ideas. He wants the retirement of experts to be made compulsory and I think it�s a
brilliant proposition.
Sackett says that ��progress towards the truth is impaired in the presence of an expert.�[7]
Trusting �experts� in oncology, for example, is generally a very good way to artificially
speed one�s trip to the grave, particularly if one has metastatic cancer (allopathic medicine
is notoriously ineffective in that realm). And yet �experts� are now on a rarified
level that perhaps only popes and celebrities can understand?�?they are virtually demigods
today.
In the main, �experts� are those people in the establishment who espouse the mainstream
dogma and reify the politically correct belief structures. �Experts� are lionized because
the world that made them experts promotes and validates them when they affirm the already
established (and profitable) beliefs?�?and the media is complicit in this. If you want
to be horribly misled on any number of important issues, just head straight to just about any
mainstream news media outlet and listen to the establishment�s �experts.�
Is it not time to get the crusty, rigidified, and corrupt Old Guard out of the way so we
can let science move forward?
Is Most Research Just Bullshit? Harvard Medical School�s Dr. Marcia Angell
is the former Editor-in-Chief at the New England Journal of Medicine, where she spent twenty
years poring over scientific papers, saturated in the dubious practices that pervade the
world of medical research. She states bluntly:
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published,
or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take
no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades
as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.[8]
Most �experts� in medicine are, psychologically speaking, simply engaged in well-paid groupthink
and confirmation bias exercises, vigorously affirming and defending their ego�s (lucrative)
construction of the world. To paraphrase physicist Max Planck, medicine, like science, �advances
one funeral at a time.�
Once the public has accepted the scientific establishment�s truths, narratives, and
designated �experts� then researchers who yield findings deviating from the accepted
norm can be immediately branded as crackpots, lunatics, fringe nuts, pseudo-scientists and
so on, regardless of how meticulous their methods, and irrefutable their results.
The media is crucial in this control dynamic because it sells the establishment�s reality.
Thus is the politically correct status quo maintained.
Peer �Review� Lets Garbage Through?�?and Lots of it!
�Peer review� censorship exemplifies the neophobia in the world of science which serves
to protect the status quo rather than improve knowledge by weeding out dubious epistemologies
and results, as it is meant to. This supposed mechanism of �quality control� has resulted
not only in the dismissal of much important and credible research, but it has also let
fraudulent research �and lots of it!?�?be published at the same time. Papers that appear
to support fashionable ideas or entrenched dogmas are likely to fare well, even if they
are badly flawed?�?or outright rubbish!
David Kaplan, a professor of pathology at the Case Western Reserve University School
of Medicine in Cleveland, has stated that,
Peer review is broken. It needs to be overhauled, not just tinkered with. The incentives should
be changed so that: authors are more satisfied and more likely to produce better work, the
reviewing is more transparent and honest, and journals do not have to manage an unwieldy
and corrupt system that produces disaffection and misses out on innovation.[9]
Is it any wonder that John Ionnidis reported in his famous 2005 paper that, �Most research
findings are false for most research designs and for most fields�? Given the already
outlined problems, is it really surprising that, in Ionnidis words, �Claimed research
findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias�?[10]
Dr. Marc Girard, a mathematician and physician who serves on the editorial board of Medicine
Veritas (The Journal of Medical Truth), has written,
The reason for this disaster is too clear: the power of money. In academic institutions,
the current dynamics of research is more favourable to the ability of getting grants?�?collecting
money and spending it?�?than to scientific imagination or creativity.[11]
In general, peer reviewers?�?generally not time-rich?�?don�t try to replicate experiments
and rarely even request the raw data supporting a paper�s conclusions. Who has the time
for all that? Thus, peer review is, according to Richard Smith writing in Peer review in
health sciences,
thought to be slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, prone
to bias, easily abused, poor at detecting gross defects, and almost useless for detecting
fraud.[12] (emphasis added)
What about fake peer review? This is where the corrupt and abysmal becomes the theatre
of the absurd. For example, Berlin-based Springer Nature, who publishes the aforementioned Naturejournal
announced the retraction of 64 articles in 10 journals in an August 18th statement in
2015. This followed an internal investigation which found fabricated peer-review write-ups
linked to the articles.
The purge followed similar discoveries of �fake peer review� by several other major
publishers, including London-based BioMed Central, an arm of Springer, which began retracting
43 articles in March citing �reviews from fabricated reviewers�.[13]
Yes, that means reviewers that don�t exist?�?recommended as �reviewers� by the people submitting
their work for review. Imagine writing a paper and being able to nominate a non-existent
person to review your work, and the contact email supplied to the publisher for this purpose
is actually one you made up, which routes the paper back to you (unbeknownst to the
publisher), so that you can then secretly carry out a (favourable) review of your own
work under a pseudonym!
It�s being done, folks, this is not a joke.
In response to fake peer review some publishers have actually ended the practice of author-suggested
reviewers.[14]
And now for the Conceptual Penis� Recently two scientists performed a brilliant
Sokal-style hoax on the journal Cogent Social Sciences. Under the pen names �Jamie Lindsay�
and �Peter Boyle,� and writing for the fictitious �Southeast Independent Social
Research Group,� Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay wrote a deliberately absurd paper
loosely composed in the style of �post-structuralist discursive gender theory�?�?what exactly
that is they made no attempt to find out.
The authors tell us:
The paper was ridiculous by intention, essentially arguing that penises shouldn�t be thought
of as male genital organs but as damaging social constructions�We assumed that if
we were merely clear in our moral implications that maleness is intrinsically bad and that
the penis is somehow at the root of it, we could get the paper published in a respectable
journal.[15] (emphasis added)
And they did. After completing the paper, and being unable to identify what it was actually
about, it was deemed a success and ready for submission, which went ahead in April 2017.
It was published the next month after some editorial feedback and additional tweaking.
To illustrate how deliberately absurd the paper is, a quote is in order:
We conclude that penises are not best understood as the male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive
organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for
society and future generations� and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.[16]
In plain English, they (seemingly) argued here that a penis is not a male sexual organ
but a social construct; the �conceptual penis� is problematic for �gender (and
reproductive) identity,� as well as being the �conceptual� driver of climate change.
No, really. How this ever got published is something to ponder. The paper is filled with
meaningless jargon, arrant nonsense, and references to fake papers and authors.
As part of the hoax, none of the sources that were cited were even read by the hoaxers.
As Boghossian and Lindsay point out, it never should have been published. No one?�?not
even Boghossian and Lindsay?�?knows what it is actually saying.
Almost a third of the sources cited in the original version of the paper point to fake
sources, such as created by Postmodern Generator, making mock of how absurdly easy it is to
execute this kind of hoax, especially, the authors add, in ��academic� fields corrupted
by postmodernism.�[17] (emphasis added)
The Spectacular Success of Hoax Papers and Non-existent Authors
In April 2010, Cyril Labb� of Joseph Fourier University in Grenoble, France, used a computer
program called SCIgen to create 102 fake papers under the pseudonym of Ike Antkare. SCIgen
was created in 2005 by researchers at MIT in Cambridge in order to demonstrate that
conferences would accept such nonsense�as well as to amuse themselves.
Labb� added the bogus papers to the Google Scholar database, which boosted Ike Antkare�s
h-index, a measure of published output, to 94?�?at the time, making Antkare the world�s
21st most highly cited scientist.[18] (emphasis added)
So a non-existent scientist has achieved the distinction of being one of the world�s
most highly cited authors?�?while �authoring� papers consisting of utter gibberish. Congratulations
are certainly in order. In February 2014 it was reported that Springer and the Institute
of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), were removing over 120 such bogus papers from
their subscription services after Labbe identified them using his own software.
Going back at least as far as 1996 journalists and researchers have been getting spoof papers
published in conferences or journals to deliberately expose weaknesses in academic quality controls.
�Physicist Alan Sokal (of the famous Sokal Affair) succeeded in the journal Social Text
in 1996,� while Harvard science journalist John Bohannon revealed in a 2013 issue of
Science that he had duped over 150 open-access journals into publishing �a deliberately
flawed study.�[19]Bohannon organized submission of the flawed study (technically, many different
but very similar variations of the study) to 304 open access journals worldwide over
a period of 10 months. 255 went through the whole editing process to the point of either
acceptance or rejection.
He wrote:
Any reviewer with more than a high-school knowledge of chemistry and the ability to
understand a basic data plot should have spotted the paper�s shortcomings immediately. Its
experiments are so hopelessly flawed that the results are meaningless.
The hoax paper was accepted by a whopping 157 of the journals and rejected by only 98.
Of the 106 journals that did conduct �peer review,� fully 70% accepted the paper.
If peer review was a transparent and accountable process, according to Gary Novak,
there might be a small chance of correcting some of the corruptions through truth and
criticism; but the process is cloaked in the darkness of anonymity�Due to the exploitive
and corrupt process, nearly everything in science has official errors within it�[A]
culture of protecting and exploiting the errors creates an official reality which cannot be
opposed.[22]
Returning specifically to the arena of (mainstream) medicine, a quote in PLoS Medicine, states:
�Journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical
industry�, wrote Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, in March 2004. In the same
year, Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, lambasted
the industry for becoming �primarily a marketing machine� and co-opting �every institution
that might stand in its way��Jerry Kassirer, another former editor of the New England Journal
of Medicine, argues that the industry has deflected the moral compasses of many physicians,
and the editors of PLoS Medicine have declared that they will not become �part of the cycle
of dependency�between journals and the pharmaceutical industry�.
In the words of John Ionnidis, �Most scientific studies are wrong, and they are wrong because
scientists are interested in funding and careers rather than truth.�
If most studies are wrong, and most scientists are more interested in their own careers and
funding than getting at the truth?�?while journals daily allow bogus and flawed pharmaceutical
research to be published and promoted?�?then why would anyone in their right mind believe
the claims made by doctors about the efficacy of products based upon �peer review� or
pharmaceutical �studies�? What does a term like �safe and effective� even mean
in this world of deception and subterfuge?
Clearly the problem of corruption and conflicts of interest have been increasingly on the
radar of professional academics for some time now, so much so that it has been the subject
of an increasing number of harshly critical articles and editorials. Conveying the depth
and breadth of deception to the �uninitiated,� however, presents a unique challenge. And
it isn�t just conflict of interest and corruption to blame for the failure of peer review, there
is human bias, shoddy review work, fake reviewers and fraud, and varying other human interests
to factor in.
At the very least we need to cease indoctrinating students into the dogma that all good things
have been peer reviewed, and the converse: anything that has not been peer reviewed is
clearly blasphemous and crafted by the unholy hands of sinners. In the meantime, the public
needs to be warned: peer review is largely a sham and will not protect you or your family
from medical pseudo-science or dangerous pharmaceutical products. Your doctor�s word should not
be blindly trusted, especially when we know that doctors rely absurdly heavily on information
(read: propaganda) provided by the pharmaceutical industry itself (can you say �conflicted�?!)
in developing their views and opinions.
I can�t help but cringe when I hear people ask if a study has been �peer-reviewed.�
The response this question most often deserves is simply, �Who cares?�
The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps
half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid
exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for
pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.?�?Richard
Horton, Offline: What is medicine�s 5 sigma? The Lancet, 11 April 2015, thelancet.com (Horton
is editor of The Lancet)
-------------------------------------------
Photoshop: How to Create a Powerful Face Logo - Duration: 10:14.
Hi. This is Marty from Blue Lightning TV.
I'm going to quickly show you how to make a simple, but powerful logo of your face and name.
Open a photo of your face or someone else's that you'd like to use for this project.
I downloaded this one from Shutterstock.
The first step is to separate theface from its background by making a selection around the face.
For this example, I'll use the Quick Selection tool.
If you're using this tool as well, drag it over your subject to select it.
To remove areas outside the subject, press and hold Alt or Option as you drag over those areas.
Once you make your selection, click the Layer Mask icon to make a layer mask of the selection
next to your subject.
We'll make a new layer below it by Ctrl-clicking or Cmd-clicking the New Layer icon.
We'll fill it with black, bur first, make sure your foreground and background colors
are black and white respectively.
If they aren't, press "D" on your keyboard.
Since your foreground color is black, press Alt or Option + Delete.
We'll convert our visible image into a Smart Object, so we can modify it non-destructively.
To do this, Shift-click the top layer to make it active as well,
and click the icon at the upper, right corner.
Click "Convert to Smart Object".
Go to Filter, Blur and Gaussian Blur.
For this example, I'll blur it 10 pixels, but feel free to experiment with the amount,
which will determine the amount of detail your portrait will have.
For now, type in anywhere from 5 to 10 pixels.
Then, click OK or press Enter or Return.
Go to Image Adjustments and "Threshold".
Keep the default Threshold level at 128.
If it's too simple, double-click "Gaussian Blur" and when the effect window opens,
lower the amount of blur.
Make a new layer below the active layer and fill it with black.
Since the logo is going to extend past our visible image, we need to add more space around it.
To do this, go to Image and "Canvas Size".
Change the parameters to "Percent".
I'll type in 130 for the Width and Height to give me ample space to work with.
To see your entire document, press Ctrl or Cmd + 0.
Then, fill the rest of the background with black.
To remove white areas of the portrait that we don't want, zoom into that area by pressing
"z" on our keyboard to open the Zoom Tool and drag over that area.
Make the top layer active and make a new layer above it.
Open your Pencil Tool and Pencil Picker.
We'll adjust the size it a moment.
Make sure its Hardness and Opacity are both 100%.
Then, press Enter or Return.
To adjust the Pencil's size, first make sure the "CapsLock" key is off and then press the
right or left bracket key on your keyboard.
Draw over the white areas you want to hide.
Then, fit your document back onto your canvas.
We'll convert our visible image into a Smart Object by Shift-clicking the bottom layer
to make all the layers active and clicking "Convert to Smart Object".
Make a new layer below it and fill it with white.
Since our background color is white, press Ctrl or Cmd + Delete.
Make the top layer active.
Let's zoom into a bit by pressing Ctrl or Cmd and the plus key on your keyboard once or twice.
Open your Polygon Tool.
At the top, type in 3 for the sides.
We'll use this amount for the purposes of this example, but feel free to experiment
later if you want.
Pick "Shape".
If you're using version CS5 or earlier, the Shape icon is here.
The "Fill" is black and the Stroke is empty.
Go to the center of your portrait and press and hold Shift as you drag the tool straight up.
Don't release Shift if you want to position the shape.
Add the Space bar with Shift as you drag the shape over.
Then, release.
Ctrl-click or Cmd-click the shape to make a selection of it.
Since we have its selection, we can delete the layer.
Either press the Delete key on your keyboard or, on earlier versions of Photoshop,
drag it to the Trash.
Click the Layer Mask icon to make a layer mask of the selection next to the portrait.
Next, we'll add an thin outline frame around around the shape.
Click the Fill box and click the white icon with the red, diagonal line.
This makes the Fill empty.
Click the Stroke box and click the black box.
I'll type in 10 pixels.
This will make it have a black stroke with a 10 pixel width.
Place your cursor on the center and press and hold Shift as you drag the tool straight up.
Don't release Shift yet.
To position it, as you did before, add the Space bar as you drag it down until the sides
are equidistant to the sides of the solid triangle.
Then, release.
To move your document on your canvas, press "v" to open your Move Tool
and press the Space bar as you drag your document.
We're ready to add text.
Open your Horizontal Type Tool and your list of fonts.
I'm using "DecoTech TL Regular".
If you'd like to use it, I provided its link in my video's description below or project files.
I'll make its size temporarily around 87 points, Sharp and center alignment.
Click the New Layer icon to make a new layer.
In this layer we'll place our text.
Click below the portrait and type out your text.
To position it, open your Move Tool and center it.
If you want to adjust your text's size, open your Transform Tool and go to a corner.
When you see a diagonal, double-arrow,
press and hold Alt or Option + Shift as you drag it in or out.
Then, press Enter or Return.
If you want to finesse the size and/or position of the portrait inside the shape,
make your portrait active and click the chain-link icon to unlink the layer and the layer mask.
Doing this allows us to resize and reposition either of them independently of the other.
Open your Transform Tool.
If the Transform's bounding box goes beyond your visible canvas, press Ctrl or Cmd + 0.
Go to a corner and drag it out or in.
Then, zoom into it again and if you want to, drag it to the center.
Next, I'll show you how to place your logo onto a black background.
Ctrl-click or Cmd-click the thumbnail of your shape layer to make a selection of it.
Go to Select, Modify and Contract.
The reason we contracted it is to prevent a thin white fringe from appearing around our logo.
Contract it 2 pixels and click OK or press Enter or Return.
We'll place all of our layers into a folder by, first, making your top layer active
and Shift-clicking the bottom layer to make all the layers active.
Then, press Ctrl or Cmd + G. Click the Layer Mask icon to make a layer mask of the selection
next to the folder. Make a new layer below it and fill it with black.
Lastly, let's crop off the excess background surrounding our logo, as well as size it.
Open your Crop Tool and the Crop preset list.
Click "Width, x Heigh x Resolution".
For the Width and Height, I'll type in 1000 "px" for pixels and for the Resolution,
I'll type in 300 pixels per inch.
Fit your Crop's bounding box onto your canvas.
Go to a corner and drag it in until your log is cropped to your liking.
Then, click the check-mark at the top.
This is Marty from Blue Lightning TV.
Thanks for watching!
-------------------------------------------
5 Things To Never Do During A Spiritual Awakening - Duration: 5:32.
5 Things
To Never Do During A Spiritual Awakening
By Power Of Positivity
A spiritual awakening means something different to everyone, one common understanding of it
is simply believing in more than just yourself.
For some, it�s trusting your gut or intuition more.
And for others, it�s even deeper � to begin to look past the physical limitations
of this reality, and focus on going within to connect to what some call God, Source,
Higher self, etc.
A spiritual awakening can lead one down a road to higher understanding of themselves
and their placement within this crazy world, and for many, they couldn�t imagine their
lives without faith in something being the centerpiece.
However, along this road toward enlightenment, inner peace, greater understanding, or whatever
you�d like to achieve, you might find yourself getting lost along the way.
This is perfectly normal, of course, but please try to stray away from the following things
that will only hinder your growth.
5 Things To Never Do During A Spiritual Awakening 1.
Staying stuck in the past or future.
One common facet of spirituality is focusing on mindfulness, or being fully aware of the
present moment.
However, we cannot do that if we remain entrenched in the past or future.
If we focus too much on times already gone or times not even here yet, we will wreak
havoc on our inner peace.
To gain inner peace, we must fully let go and embrace the present.
So, on your spiritual journey, we hope you will remember to lose yourself in the moment
you have right now, and forget about moments gone or moments that haven�t yet arrived.
Much of spirituality lies in going with the flow and not trying to control your surroundings,
anyway.
2.
Being too hard on yourself.
Along this path, you might find yourself being hyperaware of your own thoughts and actions,
so much so that you start to judge yourself too harshly.
While being conscious of the self is a big part of spirituality, you have to learn to
simply watch yourself as a mindful observer, and not judge what you might hear or see.
We live in a very judgmental world, but you have to learn to let go of these man-made
judgements and pre-conceived ideas of who and what you should be.
Your spiritual journey should not be about achieving perfection; rather, it should be
about learning to love yourself IN SPITE of those imperfections that make you, you.
Don�t believe what anyone else tells you about spirituality � it�s your own personal
journey, and no one can tell you how to traverse it but you.
3.
Feeling guilty about how you live your life.
When you start to delve deeper into your spiritual awakening, you might find that your ideals
and morals have changed a bit.
Thus, you find yourself at odds with certain people in your life, because they have gotten
so used to the old you that they don�t really know how to deal with the �new� you.
Of course, this is the natural course of life, as people change and find what makes them
happy.
However, don�t feel guilty about your life just because it doesn�t click with those
around you.
Maybe in your spiritual journey, you�ve found that you want to simplify your life,
and live off-the-grid to get closer to nature, God, or whatever you call the center of your
spirituality.
If this makes your heart happy, you have to follow it, regardless of what others may think.
You have to live your life for you, not for others.
-------------------------------------------
No andaba drogado y no se que paso!!//AlexisDamper - Duration: 3:51.
For more infomation >> No andaba drogado y no se que paso!!//AlexisDamper - Duration: 3:51. -------------------------------------------
How to Optimize Networking at an ACI Convention and Exposition - Duration: 2:26.
Are you looking how to optimize networking at an ACI Convention?
Today, I will tell you 3 tips on how to have the best experience.
Welcome to Engineering Concrete!
My name is Bret Robertson and I'm a civil engineer.
I've been a member of the American Concrete Institute since 2010.
I am starting this channel to educate the masses about my favorite construction material,
concrete.
Don't forget to subscribe.
If this is your first time to attend an ACI convention, check out ACI's guide via the
link below.
Let's check out those tips on how to optimize networking at an ACI convention.
First, attend at least one committee meeting or several.
Second, attend technical and/or educational sessions.
Third, attend Events
Number 1: Attend committee meetings
There are over 100 committees.
Pick a few committees of interest or related to your field.
Find out when and where they are and show up
For a list of those committees Check out the info card.
Participate if at all possible, your knowledge on the subject is needed and wanted.
Even if it seems trivial, this is a chance for the committee
to learn about your knowledge.
PRO TIP: Volunteer!
If you have time in the next few months to spend on documents or data,
volunteer to assist the committee. This is gold for networking.
Second, Attend technical and educational sessions.
They provide the latest research, case studies, and best practices for the industry.
Sessions span many topics.
something will be of interest to you.
I typically have 3 or more I want to attend at
every slot, each day.
Sessions start and continue through the convention.
PRO TIP: After each presentation remember to ask questions.
This is a great opportunity to be heard.
In my experience, after the session is over, if you asked a question, people are more inclined
to follow up with you.
Get your business cards ready!
And finally, Events This is where you will make your business cards
disappear!
Opening Reception, Concrete Mixer, and any time at the Exhibit Hall
For students, I'd recommend the Student competition and the student lunch.
Pro Tip! The student lunch is free for all students! Most all attendees can be found at one or
all of these events.
What is your favorite thing to do at an ACI convention?
Do you have any tips?
Let me know in comments.
Thanks for watching.
Don't forget to subscribe!
Feel free to comment about how you get the most out of an ACI convention.
Your feedback is important.
I hope to see you at the next ACI convention and exposition.
Get your business cards ready
Ah dang it, forgot my business cards
-------------------------------------------
13 DIES MÉS - SUU - Duration: 3:11.
For more infomation >> 13 DIES MÉS - SUU - Duration: 3:11. -------------------------------------------
Capital Plaza Tower reduced to rubble - Duration: 1:50.
For more infomation >> Capital Plaza Tower reduced to rubble - Duration: 1:50. -------------------------------------------
Who is the real crown killer? | Dishonored 2 | Part 3 - Duration: 25:28.
Hello everyone. My name is Crow_Se7en
Welcome back to Dishonored 2. Let's continue this game
Let's kill the crown killer
I'm pretty sure this mission will be harder. I have to avoid the guards
Let's go to the roof
Addermire map
It's the best idea to look at the map because I have never been in this place before
Let's do it
It's not higher enough
That's really sick!
She's like the Spiderman
Corvo trained Emily well
I need the dark vision so I can see through the wall
How much runes for that?
I have four runes
Should I? I need to save the runes
I need to turn that off
No one is here. Ok, good
Are they dead?
I hope so
Go to the roof again
I need to find another way
There you are
I should go over there
Hello?
What is that big red button
There you are
I have three runes. Yes, I remember
Now what?
Need to check out the map. Ok, fine
Oh, the watchtower. I need to turn it off
I think it's the best idea to turn off that one first
Is it really worth to listen his conversation?
I should turn off that one
I didn't expect that
Nothing
I need to find another way
I need to find the way to get on the watchtower then turn it off
Where is the "You're here" sign?
Her office - -
Of course, I need the rewire tool
Hey, I'm talking. Rude
I poked her eye
Too many of them
Looks like they're worse than the bees
I need to find the key
Who is that?
Oh, let's go upstairs
Hello?
I need to find the key. It should be in here
There you are
Oh, I definitely need to search her office. The rune is in the office
Let's go back
Oh, it's in there
Gross
Don't kill her. Just talk to her
Don't touch me
You're the doctor and you should wear the rubber gloves
I'm deaf
The crown killer?! Where?!
Wear the mask and goggle!
Eh, steampunk age...
Why did you give it to me?
Her office? Should I go back?
check the mission list
I already did it. Oh, I need to gather more information
Found the bonecharm
I ate the old food
Who is that?
587. Where is the safe? 587 587
What am I supposed to do now?
Find the journal
Oh hell no
Who is that?
I'm gonna leave him alone
5
8... 7
That's the journal. Counter-serum note
Oh, that's the instruction
Turn on
Let's wait for a while
Almost - -
That's the cure
Are you using that again? You should wash it first
What should I do? What should I do?
Go to sleep
Oh, I rescued the crown killer. That's good
I didn't know who was the crown killer. Now, we know who is the crown killer. It's Dr. Hypatia
Oh right, I remember that
I see the boat
Let's wait
Ok, let's go now
Yeah, let's get out of here. Let's go
We will go to the Dreadful Wale
It's true
Do you remember Solokov? I can't spell his name well. He appeared in Dishonored 1
The guy with the beard
Everything has changed. It's not like Dishonored 1
I'm awake
Let's stop for now. I will continue this for the next video. Thank you for watching
Please click Subscribe, Like, Share, or whatever that will help me a lot. See you in the next video
-------------------------------------------
Lil Backflip x Curly Hoe x Mowfucka - ''Kansloos'' (Prod. iggnickbeats) - Duration: 2:41.
For more infomation >> Lil Backflip x Curly Hoe x Mowfucka - ''Kansloos'' (Prod. iggnickbeats) - Duration: 2:41. -------------------------------------------
How To File An eBay Insurance Claim Online With USPS For Damage Or Loss Easy On Post Office Website - Duration: 6:25.
I enjoy selling on eBay, and 99.9% of the time everything goes smooth. But I sold
this snow globe and it arrived broken. My customer sent me pictures right away
showing the box was soaked and the contents were all broken. So I had to
file an online claim with the USPS. And I wanted to walk you through that and show
you how to do that. It's really not that bad.
You do first need an account with USPS. So go to USPS.com and sign up for one.
It's free. Then under, "Help", go to "File a Claim", or you can go under, "Mail and Ship",
and go to, "Claims and Refunds". But it's just more straightforward to go to, "Help",
and file a claim. So I'll click on that. And it takes you to the "File a Claim"
page, where you can do domestic shipment claims and international. This is
domestic, so I'll go on down the page and it says. "What do you need to file a claim?"
A tracking number or label number. You can get that from your eBay sales page.
You'll have to show proof of value. And in this case for an eBay item, you have
to show proof of what the item sold for and then that the transaction went
through in this case on PayPal. That you did get paid. You also need to show
evidence of insurance purchased. And for an eBay item that just comes from the
online record that is generated when you make the sale and it's paid for and you
ship it and you get a tracking number. You need proof of damage. More than
likely your customer will still have the broken item in their possession. So
they'll have to take pictures and send them to you. My customer did that right
away which is very nice because you really need that for your claim. It's
also important to know when you can file a claim. If something's broken, like mine
was, you can file immediately. But if it's just lost and hasn't shown up, you have
to wait at least 15 days for most classes of mail. This was sent by
Priority Mail and it was broken upon arrival, so I could file immediately.
Which I did so I could get my money back as soon as possible. And you just go down
to the bottom of the page and click on, "Start an online claim". The first thing
they want is the tracking number which you can easily get from your eBay sales
record. Go to your Sellers Hub, and under "Orders", you can scroll down
to the item and you can get the tracking number from there. Click it, and you can
copy and paste it. Close that window, and then go back and paste the tracking
number in and also put the shipping date in. And then just click on "Search". Next
they'll want a reason for the claim. It can be whether it's lost contents,
damaged, contents missing, document reconstruction. Of course in this case, it
was contents damaged. Then you want to put in whether there were extra
insurance fees paid. This was sent by a Priority Mail. At the time of this video,
you get $50 insurance automatically with Priority Mail if you mail it directly
with the post office. With me for eBay, I get $100 automatically. So I just put
zero in here. I didn't pay anything extra for the insurance that was on this
package. And then I selected that I was the mailer. My address was already in
there because I had an account with USPS. So I just need to put in the name and
address and information for my customer. And a good way to make that easy is just
to go back to the Seller Hub, go down to the listing, and click on "View Record".
This is where you'll find all the customer's information that you'll need.
Their name, address, email address and other information about the sale that
you'll need to complete the claim. And then if you do it in kind of a split
screen, you can just look at that and fill in that information as you go. It
also wants you to give an item name. The item type, and what category. Mine fit into
"Collectibles", so I selected that. Need to put in a short item description. I just made it
very simple. A gold balmoral Santa musical snow globe. Then you go down and
it wants the purchase date. Which isn't necessarily the ship date. In this case,
it was the day before. And if the package never arrives, the amount requested can
include the item value plus the postage, you get it all back. But if it's
delivered, they say they've done their part, and all you'll get back
is the actual item value, not the postage. Which is kind of bad, but that's the way
it works. Then they ask you to upload proof of value. What works well here are
screenshots of your eBay sales record as well as screenshots of your PayPal
transaction for this item. The eBay sales record shows what the item sold for. It also
shows that you printed a label and a tracking number was generated. And the
PayPal transaction shows that you did get money for that item from the
customer. It took me three screenshots for each page to get it all. That
generated six files for me to save for that item. So I had to select those six
files and upload them for the proof of value. And then it wanted me to upload
proof of damage. And all I had to do there was upload the pictures of the box
and the broken item that the customer had sent me. So I went to the folder that
I created for this insurance claim, selected the pictures and uploaded them.
And then it wanted me to create a nickname for this claim. And I could have
chosen anything. I just put "Snow Globe", and then clicked on, "Review Claim". Then that
jumped to the page where it says, "Review and Submit Your Claim". I certified that I
provided all the accurate information, and clicked on "Submit Claim". Then it goes
to a page where you can click on "Claim History". And it shows my Snow Globe claim,
and that it's under review. And it almost immediately sent me a confirmation email
and a confirmation text showing that my claim was received. And then I got a
check seven days after I filed this claim! The check was cut five days after
I submitted the claim, and then two days later I actually received the check.
I thought that was really pretty quick. The whole process really wasn't that bad, and
before I even started my claim, I refunded my customer all of their money.
Because I believe that's just good customer service.
Put your customer first! And if you're not already a subscriber to my channel,
I'd appreciate it if you'd become one! Thanks for watching, and goodbye!
-------------------------------------------
TROLANDO O GRINGO PARTE 2 -GUESSING GAME - Duration: 8:27.
Fazer um barraco então..de novo...
Barraca é a tenda Barraco poder um...uma casa velha
Sim, um casebre..tipo, "fazer um barraco"
fazer uma cabana! fazer um barraco
Pode me dar um exemplo numa frase?
OK, She went to a party, and she was with her boyfriend
another girl showed up and kissed her boyfriend so she made a scene!
She went like...wtf is that?? You're kissing my boyfriend in front of me?
é estar muito puto?
sim, tipo isso aí, muito mais do que isso
ok, é como s você estivesse muito puto porque
alguém esqueceu de fazer algo pra você?
Na verdade é fazer um escândalo.
Fazer uma cena de escâdalo
Aquilo que falei poderia ser uma razão
Tipo...o marido e a mulher...
Estão brigando
e eles fazem o escândalo em público porque ela tá muito puta
Você se lembra do filme 28 dias com Sandra Bullock, que ela faz um barraco?
Na festa de casamento da irmã
isso aí, "Make a scene"
Eu vou te dar todas estas expressões depois ok?
tenho uma outra expressão aqui pra você...
Vamos supor...
Você me pergunta: Ben, como vai você?
Eu eu digo que não tô bem e digo pra você..."I've just got dumped"
Bem eu sei que quando fazemos isso é semelhante a jogar coisas no lixo
É uma coisa ruim ou triste
"I got dumped" Vou e dar um pouco mais de contexto...
Você está sendo bonzinho comigo...ok, isso significa que ...
é tipo, quando sua namorada te dá um fora...isso aê...
Sim minha namorada me deu um fora
Então você fica jogado às traças (Down in the dumps)
Sim, minha namorada me deu um pé na bunda, minha vida acabou...
"Encher o bucho" - Me dá um exemplo
Tipo assim: ( Man, I went to Madero )
aquela hamburgueria
went there and just pigged out. I simply devoured 3 hamburguers
Três hamburgueres??
Yeah, I pigged out
Significa que você está de barriga cheia. Comeu muito mais do que podia.
Isso aí! Viu? Acertei uma! Ele acertou 5 mas tudo bem
Vou levar ele pra encher o bucho depois da aula. Vamos ver o que mais temos aqui...
Este é muito simples...você me convida para...na verdade, eu te convido para...
ir a um bar numa noite e você me diz: -Na verdade Ben, I'm beat"
Eu vou ficar em casa Sei lá, talvez eu esteja cansado
sim isso mesmo, cansado ...você teve um dia exaustivo
Tô muito cansado e quero ficar em casa! Muitos falantes do inglês falam assim
Acertei! Seis pra ele...tudo bem!
Jibber-Jabber (falar abobrinha)
Você sabe o que é abobrinha? Sim, é zucchini, um vegetal
(literal) Speak Zucchini Eu acho que é falar um monte de bobagens
falar um monte de asneiras! Acertou! Correto!
Ok, dois! Mais um? Sim, mais um! Ok vamos ver
deixa eu ver se consigo te dar uma mais difícil...o quê significa dizer: "I got busted"?
Ah cara, eu já joguei playstation 4
Não vale, você tá trapaceando É quando a polícia me para
Sim, isto é um dos significados tipo..a polícia me pegou
ou tipo...fui pego no flagra
basicamente isso, ser pego no flagra
ou pela polícia ou se você está traindo sua mulher...
tipo isso, mas não faça isso não
Escolha bem porque esta é a sua última chance - Comer bola?
Significa comer bolo?
Não, bola é "ball"
Me dá um exemplo!
Ok, you're paying the check
mas você dá dinheiro a mais do que precisava pra pagar
Oh, deixar o troco de gorjeta?
não, na verdade você...
você...totalmente...errou ...
errou o calculo
e acabou dando dinheiro a mais
"You eat the loss" = Comeu bola, que é deixar o que pagou a mais pra lá
pode ser também quando você não entendeu alguma coisa
tipo...Chicago Bulls ganhou o jogo e o outro diz: - No way, you're tripping
Claro que eles não ganharam o jogo, foi os Lakers
Entendi. Então é dar uma informação incorreta
ok ...vamos lá....mas supor que estamos comendo uma pizza
and we're eating pizza and you say Ben would you like another slice of pizza no
aí você diz: - Ben, você quer outro pedaço?
Aí eu digo: - "You can kill it"
Fácil, pode devorar
sim, você pode terminar a pizza
Pode usar esta expressão, não somente com comida
Você pode dizer "Kill the lights" (apague as luzes)
eu fui bem? Sim, você foi muito bem
-------------------------------------------
8 Foods You Should Never Eat If You Have Joint Pain | Avoid These 10 Foods to Avoid Worse Joint Pain - Duration: 3:25.
8 Foods You Should Never Eat If You Have Joint Pain | Avoid These 10 Foods to Avoid Worse Joint Pain
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét