-------------------------------------------
Vita Alvia - Kanggo Riko (Official Music Video) - Duration: 5:58.
For more infomation >> Vita Alvia - Kanggo Riko (Official Music Video) - Duration: 5:58. -------------------------------------------
GRUPO ARCTURIANO - [NÃO MAIS] - Duration: 16:00.
For more infomation >> GRUPO ARCTURIANO - [NÃO MAIS] - Duration: 16:00. -------------------------------------------
[Trailer]Marvel's Spider Man-Story Trailer PS4[4K Video][Hành] - Duration: 2:03.
PLEASE LIKE, SHARE AND SUBCRIBE FOR ME >.< THANK YOU
-------------------------------------------
"Is the 'World's Oldest Bible' a Fake?" Prophecy Brothers Interview - Duration: 1:07:41.
Look! It's the Prophecy Brothers!
Starring Brother Man
and Brother Champion.
They are brothers.
They are unorthodox.
David Daniels asks: "Is the 'World's Oldest Bible' a Fake?"
Man: Good Evening, and welcome to the Prophecy Brothers.
I'm Brother Man, and joining us tonight
is the honorary Prophecy Brother, Auntie Oligarchy.
Welcome, Auntie.
Auntie: Thanks. Man: Well, we have a special guest on.
Of course, all our guests are special.
But we have a real special guest on tonight.
And that's David Daniels, from Chick Publications.
And we're gonna talk about this. And here's a question
that I posed to our audience and everybody:
"Can you trust your Bible?"
David says, No, unless it is the King James Version.
And so we're gonna talk about that.
David is the author of many books. We're gonna talk tonight about
his book, "Is the 'World's Oldest Bible' a Fake?"
He's also written the book called, "Hot Topics,"
"Did Jesus Use the Septuagint?" "How They Changed the Bible,"
"You Don't Know Jack," and I guess I'll stop there.
We're the Indiana David Daniels fanclub here,
with all the David Daniels books.
So thank you for joining us tonight, David.
David: It is my pleasure.
Man: I think that somebody or something doesn't want us
to get this information out tonight, because we had some technical issues
trying to get this going. We had some sound issues.
So we're praying, and you said a prayer
before we started, that hopefully everything will keep working here.
Let's get started.
David, your book, and there's a lot in here,
and obviously to our audience we're not gonna be able
to go over everything tonight.
That's a good thing, because David doesn't want to go
through everything tonight. He wants you to buy a copy of the book
and do the research yourself.
Your book makes an argument that says the world's oldest Bible,
something called Codex "Sigh-nay-ticus"--
I mess it up. We had it down before. "Sigh-uh-nat-icus."
"Sigh-nay-ticus"
David; "Sinaiticus." Auntie: "Sigh-nay-it-icus"
Man: "Sigh-nay-it-icus" Alright. I'll forget it later.
Anyway, your book says it's a fake. When they claim it's the oldest version,
what textual critics mean, or the experts out there,
if they say it's the oldest, it's also probably the most accurate.
Can you briefly tell us what this Codex Say-a-niticus is,
and who are they that claim that this is the most accurate
version of the Bible?
David: Well first, let me show you an 80%-sized
replica of the Sinaiticus. Can you see it all here?
So it's a little bit taller and a little bit wider.
This is a codex. A codex is simply a giant, bound book.
This book has giant Greek letters. Can you see that?
Man: Yes. Auntie: Yeah.
David: Those are called "uncial" letters, or "majuscule." Whatever.
It sounds like song. "Maj-u-scule..." (to the tune of Majesty)
Nonetheless, this is a big Greek text that looks like a really old-style
Greek text. When this was discovered in 1844,
a man who was a textual scholar named Constantin Tischendorf
claimed that he had found something amazing.
But he told nobody until 1859. In 1859 he got the majority of this.
And then he put it together and published it,
and gave it the name (because it was from the
"Sinai monastery" or from the "Sinai Peninsula,"
St. Catherine's monastery, he called it the "Sigh-nay-iticus" --
"Sinaiticus." The Codex Sinaiticus Petropolitanus,
because he got it printed up in Saint Petersburg -- petro-poli-tan.
So this book, he claimed, was actually older than
the only other one that they had "dated" [as oldest]
which was the Codex "Vaticanus," called that because
it's in the Vatican.
Tischendorf believed that this book here
would help you to figure out what was in the actual, original
copies of the scriptures. So that's why he said
that this was so important, and he passed it off
as being genuine.
Now, why would people say it's not genuine?
There's a little trick you need to learn about what he did in 1844.
In 1844 he told a whole story which I will not go into.
You can read it in the book. And it's well-known.
You can see it on every website, even on Wikipedia you can see it.
He claimed that he found in a trash can,
getting ready to be burned, 43 folia.
A folio is a full page like this, which has two sides to it,
a front and a back. That's a folio.
43 of these he was able to take with him
back to Saxony, in Germany, basically, and have it published.
He called it the "Codex Friderico-Augustanus,"
named in honor of Frederick Augustus, who gave him money to
go on the trip, which is what you do.
And he showed this, not in the regular public,
where everybody could see it. It was kept with the king.
And then he published his own copy, where it was printed up with letters
that looked like it, but weren't photographs.
Because it is 1846 when he got it out.
So he's not gonna have a bunch of photographs yet.
So then he has this published. But then he comes back in 1859.
(I'm skipping 1853. That's in the book.)
He goes back in 1859 and he gets the rest of this stuff,
and takes that to Russia. That stuff he gets and does again,
he has those big letters copied, makes little [end letters],
so it looks a lot like the pages that are here, pretty much,
but it's the text that he printed. So when you looked at it,
you wouldn't see the actual pages. You see regular printing pages
of a book. The reason people say it is fake,
can be seen on the cover of the book, itself.
And you can show this however you want to do that. Man: We're gonna show a picture of that.
David: Absolutely. You'll look on here, on the cover, and you will see
that there's a bunch of stuff that's a brownish color,
which looks -- old. Then you see this other stuff,
these two little strips here, that look white.
Why could that be? Well, it turns out
that when Tischendorf looked at it in 1844, the pages were white.
They're still white to this day. The pages that he took out in 1844
and took to Germany, they're still white to this day.
It turns out also that in 1845, another guy, Porfiry Uspensky,
who actually was over the monasteries, and was an expert in texts,
saw the rest of this as a book, checked it out, and
it was ALL that color [white]. And he says it was.
However, 1859, when Tischendorf took the rest out,
suddenly it looked old.
The only way that you could tell that, is if you were able to see
the stuff in Germany and the stuff in Russia
in one place. And that did not happen
until 2009. First, some amazing technical people,
photographers with big computers and cool computer gadgets and stuff
got their cameras together and they took pictures
of every single page, in the different places.
They took pictures of the pages that were--
there were a few little bits-- in Russia, still, 'cause most of them
went to England, they went to the British Library
because-- well, that's another story.
I'll get to that in the next book. But there's parts that are in Britain,
there's parts that are in Germany, and other parts that were found
in 1975, back in that monastery, at St. Catherine's monastery.
They took all these pictures from the four different places,
and for the first time you could see them:
www.codexsinaiticus.org, you can see it for yourself,
and put them side by side.
In 2014, Steven Avery asked me if I wanted to join up with a group
that he was doing. And I was like, "Okay.
What's it about?" "Ancient Greek manuscripts."
I went, "Kaay... I'm not some big Greek expert,
but I'll be glad to do it. I mean, sure, whatever."
And Steve says, "Take a look at these."
And he showed me these pages. He showed me --
I went online and I looked at the first two pages, over here.
There's a dark one and a light one. And he says,
"Do you think someone used Pepsodent on the white pages, there?
Do you think someone lightened the pages?
And so I spent like four hours paging through.
First I checked the Greek text. Does the end of the dark page
and the beginning of the light page, is that the same sentence?
And I checked all the places where the white ends
and the dark begins, and where the dark ends
and the white begins. And I went through all those places.
They all fit. Everything was cool. So then I looked at it and went,
"Does it look like it was whitened?" So I sat there for four hours,
just looking at the text. And I looked at [them] side by side.
Well, what's the color of the ink? The shape of the ink?
No, the shape is right. This is definitely the same handwriting.
There is no doubt about that.
So then I'm looking at it, zooming in, zooming out,
because you can do it online, and I'm looking at the color,
and I went, "Wait. If you've lightened this page, here,
then the ink would also be coming up,
and you'd be able to see that difference.
And a bunch of other things would happen on the page.
And--no. Instead, I looked at
this side of the page. And I said,
"Do you know what it looks like? It looks like when I was in seminary
and I was drinking my coffee, and SPLAT!
I spilled it in one of my books, and then I started
trying to clean it up. Only it looks almost like sombody
almost like brushed it on a page. So then I turned the page over.
I went, "It looks like someone kept on brushing,
and kept on going, and turning another page,
and another page, and another page. And then it looks like it evened out."
So then I went, "Let's look at the other side
from those white pages to the dark side.
And I looked there. It was more even,
and it stayed more even. And then there's actually
different phases, and I'll show them in different places,
here, here... I can tell you where
the New Testament starts. The phasing difference there,
between the colors on the shading of the pages overall.
If you couldn't tell, I made this giant poster.
You'll see it on my website, and you have a copy.
Man: Yeah.
David: I have a giant poster in the other room.
And you can see these color shifts. And I realized,
"I think somebody darkened the pages."
So I said, "Steven, is it possible that somebody like,
I don't know, was counterfeiting by darkening pages?
And he started looking it up and went, "Oh my goodness,
there's a whole group of people, a move of people,
to counterfeit things in the 1800s."
So now we were starting to think, "There's a problem here.
Somebody is counterfeiting this Bible." Instead of lightening these pages,
for fun and display, they darkened all the rest.
That was the beginning of saying, "Is the 'world's oldest Bible' a fake?"
You go on Wikipedia, you type "world's oldest Bible,"
you go on Google, you'll find Codex Sinaiticus.
Because what it does is, this manuscript is missing
words, phrases and verses, and it changes some others,
so that scriptures now contradict each other.
They don't say the same thing. And they lower the deity of Jesus,
they lower words about the Godhead, they take away words about angels,
about devils, about heaven, about hell.
They literally modify and take away parts of history,
things that Jesus said, which we'll get into later on.
And in the midst of all that, it causes such a confusion that
you need a priest to sort it out for you.
Doesn't that sound like a plan?
Man; Let's recap things here a little bit, David.
David: Sure.
Man: So from what you saw and what you read,
first of all you looked at the pictures, and you saw that they didn't match,
there was this section that didn't match,
and that was what Tischendorf took out, basically stole,
and he took to Russia. Is that correct?
David: Germany. The first ones in 1844
were to Germany. Those white pages
were the ones he took out, I think before he figured out
that it was a fake himself, in real life.
Man: And that was the CFA.
David: He would have to darken those pages.
I'm jumping ahead. You'll have to read it for yourself.
You can make your own conclusions, but yeah, that's what I have
in the book.
Man: But so anyway, you looked at it online
and you saw that the colors didn't match.
But there's actually, you said it in your book
there's more than just you looking at it online
and the colors didn't match. Because somebody could say,
"Well, maybe people didn't scan these in right,
or there's some kind of imperfection." But there was a contemporary
of Tischendorf--
David: Yes!
Man: Upersky, Upensky, what was it? He said it was all white.
David: Porfiry Uspensky.
Man: It was all white. But Simonides said...
Was it Simonides that said Tischendorf darkened it, or did...
There was a contemporary that did
David: Actually a monk that was there. Man: A monk, okay.
David: Kallinikos Monachos. Kallinikos was a monk
who was a friend of Simonides, but wrote differently from Simonides.
Some people said, "Oh, Simonides is just writing
and pretending to be a monk." No, actually.
The locations things were sent from, where Simonides was at the time,
all that kind of stuff shows there's no way he could have been
in two places at once. Plus, they don't say
the exact same thing. They actually have
different testimonies, slightly. But Kallinikos,
everything I found when I researched that guy,
Kallinikos Monachos, every point I found so far
has matched history to a "T." Ironically,
almost everything I found so far, of Simonides
has matched history to a "T," too. But I go into that in here,
little by little. You can see it, and look at the evidence for yourself.
But what Kallinikos said is he saw Tischendorf
saying he was "cleaning the pages," but he was actually aging them.
Man: So obviously, our audience will read the book.
So it's not necessarily the oldest, because why would you need then
to make it look old,
David: You have the oldest Bible - you've said it.
You've really said that! It's a great point.
If you have the discovery of the world,
of the century, of all of Christendom,
of finally having the oldest copy of God's words,
why would you change it?
Man: Right. Auntie:Yeah.
David: Why would you darken its pages?!
Because it's not just Uspensky who saw it, and it was white,
other people who went to Saxony talked about the stuff as white.
And the other people who saw the rest of it,
said it was dark.
So you have contemporaries claiming, who've seen the different parts,
what color it really was. In fact, Tischendorf himself,
when he took out the rest of Sinaiticus, suddenly said it was "sufflava,"
which means this kind of yellowed, aged-looking.
Auntie: Hmm.
Man: And then there's some that claim,
that thought this was, I'm jumping around here a little bit.
But... Emperor Constantine
had commissioned 50 Bibles he wanted made that were
portable, I think easy to read, and so people were saying that
this could be one of those 50 Bibles.
But you kind of prove in the book, too, if you want to explain it, great,
if not, people will go there, but you brought up in the book
why it would not be one of these 50 Bibles.
You don't believe that was from the 300s.
David: Yeah, well one reason is [Constantine] wanted the best scholars
and good calligraphers, it says, to put these things together.
And if you look in here, as I have one chapter called,
"Uniquely Bad," and another one called,
"Is That Your Best Job?" Because when I was a teacher,
and a kid turned in something that looked like what you find--
and you'll see it, if you watch the video series,
but you can also see it right here in the book--
and you see the kind of mess-ups and rewrites and erasures,
and scratch-outs, and all that stuff, you'd hand it [back] and say,
"Is that your best job?" That's one of the things a teacher says,
you know? And they'd say,
"No, Mr. Daniels." And I'd say,
"Here's a fresh paper. Start over." But they [in the Sinaiticus] didn't.
So the fact that there's not only that,
there's duplication. 1 Chronicles, there's parts of 1 Chronicles that are
in there twice! There's all sorts of things that indicate
this is more like a draft paper, rather than a term paper.
This is more like a draft Bible, not a final Bible.
And I don't want to give too much away.
There's a lot of story in the book.
Auntie: Yeah, and it also appears to be
extremely rushed.
David: You do agree, then? Auntie: Yeah.
David: You do agree that it looks like a rush job.
Auntie: Oh, totally. As a teacher myself, I can understand.
Well, I'm gonna shift gears a little bit,
with a different kind of question. We both found it kind of interesting
that the occultist, Manly P. Hall, who is a 33rd degree Mason
endorsed the Codex Sinaiticus, when he said in 1944,
and I quote from you, "For the last 100 years
we have been trying to get out an edition of the bible
that is reasonably correct but nobody wants it.
What is wanted is the good old King James Version,
every jot and tittle of it." Obviously, 100 years earlier
the Sinaiticus was discovered. Why would an occultist care
if the Bible translation is correct or not?
David: First, let me show you Debbie's picture of Manly P Hall.
Doesn't he look like a sweetie?
Man: Can you raise it up a little bit? David: Sure.
Auntie: Oh, I love that one. Yes, that was a scary looking guy.
David: That is what he looked like, too. He had these great googoo eyes.
Anyway, Manly Hall was so knowledgeable
about the occult. He basically befriended a rich lady,
and he was already a spiritist at the time,
and she just said, "Oh, here.
Here is every bit of money you ever wanted.
Go find stuff."
And so he did. And in his teens and early 20s
he was able to figure out the secrets of Freemasonry,
while not yet being a Mason. He figured that stuff out so much so
that a number of years later they made him
an honorary 33rd degree Mason. He was a friend
of 33rd degree Mason Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
President of the United States. They became fast friends.
In fact, he sent his government officials to do microfilm of all of his books,
so that they'd keep all these spiritist books.
I want to know: a guy with connections,
and with that kind of occultic influence as he,
and who talks about Lucifer and all that stuff that he says,
"Who's 'we'?" Who's the "we"
that put together a Bible. "We" have been assembling this Bible.
"We"? Well, it turns out that comes from
something I had to assemble in little pieces,
because you couldn't find it online. Actually, it just came online.
Somebody just put it up. So you can find it now.
But I had to assemble this. It wasn't even there,
and figure what Manly P. Hall had actually said.
I found this article from 1944. And he was talking about
the establishment of a new world order.
And in order to establish this new world order,
they needed to have everybody on board,
and use something called "psychology," and "tolerance,"
and bring it from kindergarten on up and start teaching people
how to do this, taking 4 or 5 generations to do it,
it said. But the problem was these people
who cling to the "jot and tittle" of the King James Bible.
Now this is the same guy who lifted up the Latin Vulgate,
lifted up Westcott and Hort, even lifted up the Sinaiticus,
and other writings. Why would he be afraid,
an occultist, of the King James Bible,
saying that the people who believe this jot and tittle
will not join this new world order?
And that's part of the mystery we want to solve.
I'm going into some of that in the second book.
Man: And so we are in, he said "Five generations."
Are we just starting the 5th generation now?
David: We are going into the 5th generation now.
Yeah, and think about it: psychology and tolerance.
You don't ever hear that in the news, do you?
Man: We never hear about "being tolerant."
David: No! No! You hear about IN-tolerance, but...
I learned about that from a meme. Somebody put a meme online,
and that's what started me going on this.
Auntie: Oh yeah. Man: Wow.
David: I'm telling you, God can use some great things,
some brothers in Christ, they find some quotes,
and I'm going, "Is that for real?
I've got to find out!" And -- got a book for it now.
So there we go.
Man: Well, you know, since 1944,
and we're talking about kind of where we're at
in the generations and things, there's been a lot of
translations and updates to the Bible versions.
So it looks like they've made some progress.
They're on their way to do that.
We've had several guests on the show. And so I thought what I'd do
is just take a survey of a few of them and see whoever answered back
and say: What Bible version do you like?
What's your favorite Bible version? So maybe you can talk about
how these relate to Codex Sinaiticus..
Auntie: You did it! Yay! Man: Alright!
I butcher all languages, even English. Okay.
Here are some of the guest replies. One of them,
his favorite is the NASB 1977 version. A couple guests said ESV,
he said because it was from the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The New King James Version. And then another one said
the NASB, which I guess there's an updated version
from the 1990s?
David: Yes, 1995.
Man: So how are all these related to what we're talking about?
David: To the Sinaiticus. Let's have some fun with Sinaiticus.
Okay, well, The New American Standard.
I'm so glad you said the 1977, 'cause it's great. It's just great.
When we come to Luke 24, Luke 24, New American Standard Bible,
and you go to verse 51. It says,
"And it came about that while He was blessing them, He parted from them."
That's fine. That's great. And then it says
52 "And they returned to Jerusalem with great joy,"
53 "and were continually in the temple, praising God."
That's wonderful. Here's a problem, though.
See it was Gail Riplinger who actually found it,
so I cannot claim this one. This was in 1993,
Gail Riplinger came up with a book called, "New Age Bible Versions."
And she pointed out, there's a problem
with that being removed. And by the way,
the only reason it's removed, is because it's removed from here!
In fact, in the book, I even show you the place where it is, and the arrow,
and where somebody scribbled it at the top of the page,
but it's not a part of original Sinaiticus. Because of that,
the New American Standard removed some words.
So let me first show you what Acts says.
It says, and this is reading from the same
New American Standard,
1 "The first account I composed, Theophilus, about all that Jesus
began to do and teach,"
The first account, of course, is of course, the Gospel of Luke.
2 until the day when He was taken up..."
Wait! There's nothing about being "taken up."
Let's go back to that.
Luke 24. Oh! There's a footnote. "Some mss. add
and was carried up into heaven." "Some manuscripts."
So because Sinaiticus doesn't have it, it says "some manuscripts HAVE it."
MOST manuscripts HAVE it.
Auntie: Yeah.
David: It's Sinaiticus that does NOT have it.
That's the truth. That was kind of a lying note.
But it says here [in Acts], 1 "The first account...
all that Jesus began to do and teach,
2 until the day when He was taken up..."
Which means, it had to have been in that text.
So Sinaiticus can't possibly be right, because Luke himself tells you
My first book, Luke, actually has
Him being taken up into heaven.
So, after Gail pointed out that their pants were down like that,
the 1995 put it back in. So now it says,
51 "While He was blessing them, He parted from them
and was carried up into heaven."
Now the 1995 also removes all sorts of other stuff.
But if you really want to know what's in or out of
the New American Standard, you can get this book,
which you didn't show, "Look What's Missing."
I compare the King James Bible to 41 different translations,
even including the new-new-new-new-new NIV,
the 2011. So you can look it up
and see for yourself all the verses that are missing,
the words that are missing, out of 257 selected verses.
And then I even have charts in the back, and percentages,
and all of that fun stuff. You can see how the
New American Standard Update is still removing stuff.
But that's another story.
Now, English Standard.
Man: Yes.
David: English Standard, you said, "Dead Sea Scrolls."
That's fun. Let's see. Hold on just a second...
Here. I have all sorts of stuff in my office.
Dead Sea Scrolls. Now you've got to
ask yourself a question. Why would it make a difference
to have the Dead Sea Scrolls? We already know
that the Hebrew manuscripts were passed down
through the tribe of Levi. The scriptures tell you.
Auntie: Yeah.
David: They were entrusted with the scriptures,
they passed it down. And as they continued
to pass it down, family to family,
group to group, through the priestly line,
that eventually there became another group.
There's no temple anymore. But they continued to pass
[the scriptures] down, and a group got together
which we call the Masoretes. Okay? The Masoretic scribes.
They were just decended on the same line,
but they're now given a different name, because they're no longer connected
to the temple issues and stuff. And so for 5, 6, 700 years,
they continued to copy the Hebrew scriptures.
And so we have this unbroken line. Very important.
We know "provenance"-- we have proof of
where something came from. We have "chain of custody"--
we know, just like in a courtroom. You have evidence, and you say,
"Oh, we have evidence tampering."
No, we don't. We have a chain of custody.
And we can show that we have the same evidence
and it is passed through these tests and now we have the same thing here,
as was back here. And we have the provenance
to show it was by these people. That's what we have
with the Hebrew scriptures. That's amazing.
Now the Dead Sea Scrolls.... Let me first show you:
why would they want the Dead Sea Scrolls?
Because the only reason they'd emphasize it,
for, say, the English Standard Version, is if it had
something that was different, right?
Auntie: Yeah.
David: If it was the same, you'd go, "Oh, it just backs it up."
And actually over 90% of it does back it up.
It's the same stuff, which is amazing. Because the Dead Sea Scrolls
have ZERO provenance. We have NO IDEA
where they came from. There is no history of
where they came from. There's no history
of who did it. We don't know
who passed it down. We don't know
how long it's been there. And they're assembled
from 17,000 little scraps of paper that have been
computer reassembled over time. Since 1949, starting with microscopes,
and then working up to computers, to assemble them together.
Although there are a few scrolls, like Isaiah, there are two Isaiahs,
and there's Exodus and Psalms, those are the best ones.
And those, actually, so largely match our preserved text
of Hebrew, the Masoretic Text, that there's no reason
even to think about it. But if they go,
"Yes, but it changed over here, therefore we are gonna trust this..."
Trust who?
Auntie and Man: Right.
David: I mean, Joe Schmo down the street
could have made his own copy, and then stuck it in a cave.
There is no proof of anything. No provenance.
No chain of custody. So there you go.
We need to have those to prove it.
Now what you would use it for, in the English Standard,
specifically, maybe, would be this: the Apocrypha.
Auntie: Yeah.
David: See, what people won't tell you, and my own seminary professors
did not tell me, was that the Codex Vaticanus,
the Codex Sinaiticus, the Codex Alexandrinus,
that they were using to change the New Testament,
weren't just New Testaments. They were also Old Testaments.
And the thing they called "The Septuagint,"
which means translated by seventy, allegedly,
you have a book there Did Jesus Use the Septuagint?
The Septuagint is not just an Old Testament.
It turns out that what they call a Septuagint,
that we've seen any one that you can hold in your hand,
is actually looking just like a Catholic Bible.
It has an Old Testament. It has Apocrypha mixed in,
as if it were scripture. And it has New Testament, too.
So obviously, no copy of the so-called Septuagint
could be that old, because it has a New Testament attached to it.
Right? Auntie and Man: Right.
David: There's a whole story more in "Did Jesus Use the Septuagint?"
that goes into all the history of that. But then the other thing
that you do with the Septuagint, though,
is change Old Testament things. But do you want to know
how many Old Testament things there are in the Dead Sea Scrolls,
that apply to the Old Testament, that have been said
to have been a part of the Septugint? Get ready, 'cause here they are.
Ready? Can you see it?
Auntie: Little bits. Man: Yeah.
David: That's it. I'm done. That's it.
All that talk is about those pieces of paper.
I got those from the University of Pennsylvania.
I found them years ago, and I've checked ever since.
I've got books on the subject, and everything.
That's it! And most of those
are dated close to the 1st century.
So there's nothing that affects the Bible as a historical, transmitted document.
And if there's any changes, it has no provenance,
and no chain of custody, and definitely
no connection to the Levite priests, no way the apostles would have used it,
no way Hebrew speakers in Palestine would have used it.
And the only time you actually hear of it being used
is in Alexandria, Egypt, from the 100s AD onward.
Man: Okay.
Auntie: Well, you touched on Alexandria.
One of my favorite bits in your book is the word, "apt."
Could you kind of touch on that for our audience?
That might help. It helped me
to keep it straight.
David: Yeah! It was really fun. I really want to be an "apt" learner.
The Bible talks about being "apt," an apt learner.
I want to be an apt student of the word. And so "A-P-T" helps me.
A stands for two things. They are two cities.
There's Alexandria, Egypt. And that's where we hear about these
supposedly "older and better" texts.
And then there's Antioch of Syria, where "the disciples
were called Christians first."
If you scratch any big scholar deep enough,
you will find out that there are only two cities
that everything goes back to: either Antioch
or Alexandria.
From Antioch come the people that they called,
the Alexandrians even called, "hyper literalist."
Now, if you're a hyper literalist, that means you're going to
pay attention to every letter of every word, right?
Auntie: Yep.
David: That means you're pretty likely to want to have the same text,
and not change it.
But over here, at Alexandria, were people who were
spiritualizers, or allegorizers. They did not believe
that the literal scriptures were true. And they allegorized them.
And they thought they were smarter than the literal text.
Who's more likely to change the scripture?
People who believe in every jot and tittle of it?
Or people who believe that they have the right
to manipulate the story for their own ends?
So that's the two cities. I say that Antioch is Apostolic.
Because the Apostles are connected with Antioch.
The other is Alexandria, which I call Apostate.
Because the people here were apostate Jews,
they left Judaism, well, Hebrew religion,
before Judaism, and they were apostate
Christians as well, because they literally
blended Christianity with Gnosticism, paganism,
Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, and things like that.
So that's A.
P. The Apostles Preserved God's word. Very simple.
If it's the words of God, the people in the Apostolic group
want to Preserve it. So that's the P here.
The P here is Polluted. Because they modified it,
by adding things taking things away
to accord with their modified beliefs about Jesus,
about the Godhead, about heaven and hell and devils,
about history and events and all sorts of stuff.
So that, the P here, is Polluted.
Then we have T. There are two things, not one.
Like when we get to the New King James,
it's largely the same Greek and Hebrew text --
not all-- but largely the same as the King James Bible.
Very, very close, except for a couple of things.
There are two things we talk about. Usually we talk about the Text.
That's the first T. The Text, of course,
is definitely different, when you have words
added in or taken away.
But the other is Translation. And an amazing thing happened.
Instead of the historical understanding of Greek and Hebrew words,
there became a change in the 1600s starting in the Catholic
universities in France, and then going into Germany,
and then into England and America, where they
changed the meanings of those Greek and Hebrew words,
even how to teach Greek and Hebrew, so that you would come up with
different meanings of the text.
Since I mentioned New King James,
let me give you one more thing. Because you mentioned
New King James, I want to show this to you.
What is one of the most famous statements of Jesus
around the world? When He was on the cross,
and His enemies were around Him like Psalm 22,
they're calling on him, calling against Him,
and they're reviling Him. Jesus looked down on them and said,
David, Auntie and Man: "Father, Forgive them; for they know not
what they do." (Luke 23:34).
That is known all over the world.
Here's the New King James. They intentionally, from 1982 onward,
wrote all the textual notes of the disagreeing verses
from Bibles, and put them in the footnotes.
And they said in the directions, You get to make your own decisions
about whether you think it belongs or not.
And so, on this verse, it says,
"NU" -- the Nestles-UBS Text -- brackets the first sentence
as a later addition." Why would they
take out the words, "Father, forgive them;
for they know not what they do"? Because they're missing from:
Codex Sinaiticus!
Now let me ask you a question. If the most famous verse,
one of the most famous verses of statements in the Bible
you cannot trust, and you cannot trust
that God preserved only what He wanted,
how do you know that He is gonna preserve your soul?
If the God who promised to preserve His words
cannot preserve a Book, how is He gonna preserve your soul?
How can you know? And if that doesn't belong,
how do you know that John 3:16 really belongs?
How do you know you're not gonna dig in the dirt
in a new cave somewhere, and find and "olderer and besterer"?
And then that one will say, there is no John 3:16.
Or maybe it will change the words.
Are you gonna put your faith in that? Or in the historically passed-down,
by persecuted believers, Bible?
And that's where I go. You have a choice to make.
Do you believe what God preserved? Or you believe what God ... hid?
The modern scholars say: "You crazy people
are saying that THIS BEAUTIFUL MANUSCRIPT
(sniff)" --By the way,
none of my professors ever brought this
into their classroom-- [You have to thank Jack McElroy.
I have learned more things from this because he sent this
from Massachusetts to here, so that I could study it.
So props, props for him.]
"THIS BEAUTIFUL BOOK, you're saying that
somebody counterfeited this book in the 1800s?"
Yes!
What are YOU saying? That God HID His real words,
missing words, phrases and verses, that you suddenly have to take out
of your Bible, AFTER 1800 years?
Because the 1800 years goes both ways.
1) You can say this was a faked Bible,
and I have all sorts of evidence that you can evaluate for yourselves.
or 2) that God allowed a fake Bible to be around
for 1800 years, and then suddenly,
in the 1800s, turned everybody to
Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, which the Vatican was so happy about,
they gave special accolades and awards to Tischendorf,
and all the textual scholars who would work with it.
Because when they worked with it, they had a lifetime of work,
because everything is so disagreeable in it.
There's so many erasures, so many changes.
In fact, in my next book-- and I haven't even put out
these videos yet-- but in my next book
I'm actually gonna show you guys that there were two groups of monks
that were fighting against each other over what readings to write
in the margins, while correcting
this draft copy of a Bible.
That's another story that I will get to in a few weeks.
Man: Well, can you touch on the Gospel of Mark,
in relation to all of this causing some doubt,
and what was left out.
David: I would love to. In fact, it was at my old Bible college.
In fact, if you look at some of my videos,
you might actually find my Bible college's video.
I just lost your sound, just in case you're wondering.
Man: Okay, can you hear us now? David: Oh, I hear you now.
Okay. You can cut that.
In my old Bible college, my own professor,
I was his top student, and he had a former top student
which I mentioned. You can see his name in the book.
And on YouTube-- they actually filmed
when they talked about the Codex Sinaiticus.
And they spent a lot of time doing this for me.
They did all the work. And what they said in that session
was the same thing as 30 years ago (30+ years ago now)
for a Resurrection Sunday service. My professor came [and preached]
to a local church. My wife and I came
and listened to him.
He said the same basic words. And so literally he put on film
what he said in the church. And he basically said that
there are certain things that don't belong
in the Gospel of Mark. And it's because
they are missing from... Sinaiticus.
Now this is interesting, because there's just two words missing up here.
This is the Greek. It says, "Kata Markon"
"According to Mark." And here it says
"The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus" (Iesou Christou)
"Jesus Christ." And then it goes on to verse 2.
Well, your Bible, if you look at it typically,
most Bibles say, "The beginning of the Gospel
of Jesus Christ, the Son of God."
This [Sinaiticus] does not originally have "the Son of God."
A corrector wrote it, really tiny, in the margin right here.
Do you see it? Auntie and Man: Oh, yeah.
David: That little thing! Now that tiny little mark in there
(ha ha, mark in Mark) changes the meaning
of the entire chapter of Mark 1.
Here's how it works.
If you don't have the words, "Son of God,"
then you don't have the pre-idea that Jesus Christ IS God's Son.
Okay? So then it starts out and says,
Okay, John the Baptist is here, and he's baptizing people
to forgive their sins. So they're coming
to get their sins forgiven. They're getting baptized
to get their sins forgiven. It says so.
Then you move a few verses down. It says Jesus also came.
And Jesus also got baptized. What do you imply from that?
People were going to be baptized
to get their sins forgiven. Jesus also came.
Jesus also was baptized. Implication:
Auntie and Man: He's getting His
David: He's getting His sins forgiven. Exactly..
Then it says that God spoke from heaven
"Thou art my beloved Son..."
That's called "adoptionism." An early cultic belief,
a Gnostic belief, was that Jesus was a man,
who had to "become" the Son of God.
Now it may not seem [like this] to the people listening right now.
"It doesn't say that to me. I know who He is.
I have the other Gospels." No, but you're reading
the Gospel of Mark. And you're reading
what it says. Could it actually make a scholar
believe something like that?
As a matter of fact, yes.
Where is my book?
Here it is. The guy who photographed Sinaiticus
first, the New Testament, in 1910, he's a guy named Kirsopp Lake.
He wrote this book, 15 years after
he photographed Sinaiticus. It's called "The Religion of Yesterday
and Tomorrow."
It's a very interesting book, hard to find.
I'm so happy to have it. Listen to this about
just chapter 1 of Mark.
He said, "For it may be argued..." Oh, I have to tell you a word.
"Apotheosis." "Apo" is "from,"
"Theos" is "God." Apotheosis means
God coming from heaven and becoming a man.
Okay, so Apotheosis, God becoming a man.
We call it "the incarnation," to use the Latin term.
"For it may be argued that Mark knows nothing,
even of an apotheosis," (Of God becoming man)
"and only shows that Jesus was
believed to have become A son of God,
possibly at his baptism, and that the disciples,
and perhaps Jesus himself, BELIEVED he was the son of man,
which only means "man," who had come from heaven
in the last day to judge the living and the dead.
this is 'Adoptionism,' but it's not necessarily apotheosis."
And then it goes on.
So this guy himself says, who photographed this manuscript,
and knows that it doesn't have "the Son of God"
and it's about the only thing that doesn't have it,
says that Jesus was "adopted" at best, as "a" son of God.
And that's as close as it gets.
Later on, a few years after that, in 1941,
Kirsopp Lake wrote these words.
To see how it's affected his faith, it's here in "Look What's Missing."
"In spite of the claims of Westcott and Hort
and of Von Soden, we do not know
the original form of the Gospels, and it is quite likely
that we never shall."
That's the opposite of what Tischendorf said
in 1844 and 1853 and 1859 and 1862, all through 1867.
That's the opposite. He said, Now we shall know
exactly what God did. And we shall show
this wonderful thing about what God's words were.
But that's not what they did. They did the exact opposite.
You see, we already knew what God's words were.
They were passed down by the persecuted believers.
And in English we have them in the King James Bible.
Man: So it really comes down to 2 things,
doesn't it? It comes down,
like you said in your book, faith versus doubt,
or doubt versus faith. And it's to create doubt.
David: Absolutely. The Devil had a "Plan B"
that he did during early Christendom.
And that was to kill people and try to destroy their Bibles.
Well, it didn't work. 'Cause there's always more Christians.
And there's always preservation of Bibles, because
God kept the promise.
God didn't say, Man shall have to keep the Bible
for everything to be good. He said [in Psalm 12:6-7],
"Thou shalt keep them, O Lord: thou shalt preserve them,
from this generation for ever."
It was God's responsibility. Jesus Himself said,
mentioned 3 times, Matthew, Mark and Luke:
"Heaven and earth shall pass away,
but my words [words - 's'] shall not pass away."
It was God's responsibility to put all this together.
And... I forgot your question.
Man: Oh, faith versus doubt.
David: Okay, "Plan B" was to kill the people
and destroy their Bibles. "Plan A" is the Garden of Eden.
"Yea, hath God said ...?" It causes four steps.
And this is exactly what happened in Genesis chapter 3,
and exactly what happened with the modern Bible movement.
The first one is Confusion. "Yea, hath God said?"
"Yeah, has He said it? Did God tell us
what we're supposed to do? Is this God's word?
Is this not God's word?"
Confusion.
The 2nd one, Doubt. "I'm no longer sure.
I - I doubt He did. I'm - I'm just not really clear.
I don't know. I'm just gonna hold back
on that one for now."
Welcome to Bible college. That's Doubt.
The 3rd step: Disbelief. "I don't believe
that God said this, or that God really meant
to preserve it"
And the 4th is Rebellion. "I'm gonna go my own way
and do my own thing."
And the Devil doesn't care where on that stairway that you go,
as long as you're on it. And what it is, is
the Devil doesn't care what Bible he gets you TO.
All he cares about is which Bible
he gets you FROM.
If you can hold one Bible, as I can, right now--
and I was trained in all this, I was taught in my Greek class,
I went into Advanced Greek at Fuller Seminary,
took my Hebrew, went and did Wycliffe Bible Translators
stuff, Summer Institute of Linguistics,
continued reading papyri, I have all sorts of
books on the stuff, I've been reading it for decades,
and I found out I was wrong.. My professors were wrong.
I was wrong. God really did preserve His words.
I can hold this Book, and I do, regularly,
and say, "I believe every word of this Book."
It really is God's book in my language.
Nobody can do that with these. Auntie: Yeah.
David: It's faith vs. doubt. And it really is the Christian's choice.
Man: The reason I felt compelled to contact you about the show is,
we get mail here at the house occasionally,
for Wycliffe Bible Translators, because the person
we bought the house from was associated with them.
And so I was like, "Is this a sign to contact David
about the Bible translations?"
David: Yeah, well, Wycliffe Bible Translators,
in that book that you have over there, "Why They Changed the Bible:
One World Bible for One World Religion,"
it's almost like the answer to this book.
It tells you the End Game. And so I'm doing all the other books
to tell how we got to the End Game.
So we're at the End Game with "Why They Changed the Bible,"
and we're at the beginning game with how it started in the 1800s
with faking the Sinaiticus --and maybe Vaticanus,
but that's another book. We have this possibility
of how they moved toward One World Bible.
And they needed a guy who is a "man at the crossroads,"
to create a Bible movement that would lead you
toward the fake Bible, away from the real Bible,
and into enough confusion that you would need a priest,
or enough agreements with Rome, Auntie and Man: Yeah
David: that Rome would say, "We have to approve of this Bible
before you can distribute this Bible."
So they had agreements. 1966 they had these agreements.
But that's all in that book.
Man: Now, in your opinion, okay, they're switching
to a one world Bible, and I'm thinking in order to do that,
eventually they are going to have to make a leap.
They're creating the doubt. Now they're gonna have to
make the leap that Jesus was just a prophet,
as maybe the Muslims say.
Do you see the Catholic Church getting behind that?
Is there gonna be a point where maybe they'll say,
"Hey, we were wrong all along. Jesus wasn't the Son of God.
He was just this Prophet, and we need to merge
with all these other religions is that...?
Do you think that's what they're gonna do?
David: Very interesting question. I've not ever been asked that one
in public before.
There is a possibility, I mean, if you use your imagination.
One thing you have to say is ... I already believe,
and you can see it on our website, on youtube.com/c/chicktracts ,
on our YouTube site, I do believe that
the Whore of Babylon, from Revelation 17 and 18,
really is the Roman Catholic Church. I go through 9 points
to show why it is, and I give you pictures and everything
to take you through it, one step at a time.
But I believe that the Antichrist is gonna be
either the white pope or more likely the black pope,
the Jesuit General. Of course now we have
a Jesuit pope. You kind of have both
at the same time. But what they declare
is that the pope is "christ on earth."
Now, is it necessary to have Christ in heaven,
if you have "Christ on earth"? Can they lower that Christ
to raise up the man? Because guess what?
When your professors lower the scriptures,
they raise themselves. Auntie: Yeah.
David: When my professors lowered my belief in this Bible,
they raised up my belief in this one. But wait!
What if my professor now came out with THIS one?
The same professor comes out with another Bible!
Am I gonna believe him here? You see what I've done?
I've shifted from trusting God to trusting man.
Now yes, men got together on this [the King James Bible].
But unlike other Bibles, when the King James
was put together, 1604-1610,
then published in 1611, it was done in such a way
that 54-plus people total were going over the text
no less than 14 times.
And they weren't allowed to go off by themselves
and have "their" individual thoughts. They had to literally
convince everybody else of their beliefs.
And only, according to the rules of the game,
if they disagreed after all that work,
and everybody else agreed, but one guy was still like,
"No, but I like my view," then he got an "or" in the margin.
So I always tell people, "If you see the word 'or,' (in the margin)
you can ignore." Auntie and Man: Oh!, Good.
David: But this is a Bible based on agreements,
such agreement, of people with two different
points of view: the Puritans,
who were really narrow in their way, of seeing scripture, and
they stripped their churches bare, and stuff like that;
and then the ornate Church of England.
They had all these people getting together and agreeing
on the words.
And they prayed, and they trusted God.
And you know how you know a tree?
Man: By its fruit. Auntie: Fruit.
David: The fruit of people who believe this book
is a book in itself. It's actually multiple books.
I have a lot of the books of the people who believe this Book.
The largest, world-wide missions movements
were started by people believing This Book.
The largest denominations, where people would split away
from something that had pulled away from God,
and come back to Him, This Book.
This book has brought together...
Well, people say, "The Pilgrims came over,
and they had the Geneva Bible." Well, isn't it funny?
We don't have a single Geneva Bible that went over the Mayflower.
My ancestors, through the Hopkins line,
came over on the Mayflower. The only Bible that we know
came over on the Mayflower was a King James Bible,
believe it or not. That's the one we know.
We actually have a copy of it in Massachusetts.
The original, it IS in Massachusetts.
But my point is, the next generation of
all the Pilgrims, despite the fact that
they started with the Geneva Bible, and their political feelings,
ended up with the King James Bible.
Their children trusted this Bible.
And our country was founded even by people
who believed THIS Bible.
So I believe that THIS Bible has a FRUIT of faith.
I have never seen a revival of faith
with any-- not even the New King James--
Not the Reviled Slandered-- Revised Standard,
not the New English Bible, not the Revised English Bible,
not the "new and improved" Contemporary English Bible,
you just name it. The Message,
the Goodspeed, the Wuest, the Moffatt, you name it,
Living, Dead, whatever Bible you have,
not a single one of them has brought about faith like that.
So the FRUIT is in this Book.
If nothing else, be a fruit-chooser, you know?
Pick your fruit wisely. I want the fruit of faith.
Man: Yeah, there is always a, when people are using
the other translations, they'll read a translation
and they'll say, "Well, let's see what
the other one has to say." And it's that doubt.
And then it's picking, "Well, which one
do I like the best?"
David: And THEY become the "Bible scholar!"
Stage 4: Rebellion. "I'll do it my own way."
Auntie: Well, when you start picking verses or words,
to suit what you think is right, then you are,
whether you are aware of it or not, participating in becoming
god-like.
David: Yes! "I want the PAC Bible -
the Pick and Choose Version!" "I want the
Multiple Choice Version - the MCV!"
"Whatever I want to believe!"
"This time I want this to be about males.
This time I want it to be about males AND females.
This time I don't really care what it is!
Animals are fine!"
You can make your Bible the way you want to,
when YOU are the judge of it, instead of the history,
and transmission, of faithful, persecuted believers.
Man: Now let me ask you this. And this may not come out right.
But you were not always a King James only, right?
When you were in Bible college.
David: Not even close.
Man: So let's say a meteor hit California at that time,
when you were, or whatever, and you died.
Were you saved then, even though you weren't
King James?
David: We are not saved by books. We are saved by faith
in the shed blood of Jesus Christ, who died for our sins.
We are only saved by putting our faith
in the Son of God and not in ourselves.
First, we turn to Him, which is all we do, we "repent,"
which means we turn to Him, from our sin.
We're not stopping, we're in the midst of our sin,
we're filled with yuckiness. But we turn,
just like the people who had been bitten by serpents.
Jesus said, talking about looking upon Him,
right? If I be lifted up,
I will draw all men to Myself. And then also,
As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness,
even so must the Son of Man be lifted up.
That whosoever believeth in Him should not perish,
but have eternal life.
So that's what God provided, that you turn and look upon Him.
Behold! When they beheld
the serpent up on the pole, which was representative,
although it was a serpent, because they were bitten by serpents,
but the Person who became a curse for us,
like a serpent on a pole, they beheld Him,
and they were instantly healed. So they were still yucky,
while they were turning, they were still dying,
they were still writhing in pain, but when they turned
and looked upon Him... They looked upon the serpent.
They placed their faith that something was gonna happen,
right? Auntie: Yeah.
David: Well, when you turn (repent) and look upon Christ,
and place FAITH in Him-- it always says "repent and believe,"
"repentance and faith." It never says "faith and repentance."
Because you have to turn first, to know who you're looking at.
Auntie: Yeah, right.
David: And then you place your faith in the Son of Man,
God's Son, the Son of God,
God, who died for your sin,
and trust that His shed blood paid for your sin,
paid the penalty, then you're saved.
It is not a matter of what book you read.
However, if you want to grow, in faith,
you need the words of faith.
See, Romans 10:17 says
"Faith cometh by..."
Man: Hearing David: Hearing,
"and hearing by the word of..." man?
Auntie and Man: No, God.
David: Oh! "So then faith cometh by hearing,
and hearing by the word of God."
So if I have the word of man, then faith is not gonna be the product.
I need to have the word of God. So if I want to grow in faith...
Romans 1:17 says we go "from faith to faith"
even as it is written, the just shall live by faith."
The way to do that, is to have the words of faith,
without the mixture of man's opinions.
Auntie: Amen. Man: Okay.
So, any other questions, Auntie?
Auntie: I do not. No. I think that pretty much sums it up
for now, or we could keep talking
for another hour.
Man: Yeah. Well, definitely everybody's got to,
you've got to get the book, because we've only
scratched the surface of the research David has done.
And you probably need to read it. I actually started going throught it
a second time, just because there's a lot in there.
But I think you really do, you do make the case, because
these new versions are based on a fake.
And so I think that everybody needs to realize that.
And whether they still want to trust the version that they have, so.
David, your books can be ordered at chick.com, correct?
All of them there?
David: That's right. You don't even have to put the www.
Just go chick.com [Enter]
and it'll take you right there.
Man: I haven't read this one yet. But I understand
that this one is not printed out anymore?
David: You have a very rare copy. They're only in ebook now.
That's when I interviewed Jack about why he wrote different tracts.
And I got the interview in there. And since Jack's in heaven,
that's the only place where you're gonna find out what he said
about those tracts. And I.. basically wrote "Home Alone,"
I'll take the cred-- the blame.
But the "Home Alone" tract is also in there.
And we talked about WHY we wrote that tract.
Man: I got this from Goodwill, actually.
David: Wow. Man: I found that there.
Out of Texas, I found it online, and they put it up -
it was on Amazon, I went through there.
But the rest I did get, I think I either got it from yours, Chick,
or some of your books are available on Amazon, too.
David: Yes. Well, this just became available
on Amazon, today. So not just the ebook,
but also the physical book you can get. They had a ... glitch.
But now it's available today. So, it's the perfect day!
Man: And the last time that we talked, we were testing out
your new computer and Skype, almost 2 months ago now,
and I asked David a question about this book [Babylon Religion],
and he goes, "Did you read the Appendix?"
And I'm like, "No," And guess what?
I still haven't gotten to it yet, because I got your other book.
So, I promise I'll get to that.
David: It's 10,000 words. I got a letter from another person
who said that, "The Appendix alone
was worth the price of the book." Because it has all this backup,
in context, where you can look at it for yourself.
And I have to tell you: I had no horse in this race,
when I started. I didn't care
where the Sinaiticus came from.
It didn't matter to me. My faith was
already here [in the King James], for other reasons.
Whether it was ancient or modern, I didn't really care.
But I found out that it was, that it was part of a larger... scheme.
And what started out to be maybe 2 videos
turned out to be that book. So it's literally
by a person who didn't care. And now I've found out,
and now it's exciting, 'cause I'm the guy who watched "Columbo"
three times in a row.
Auntie: Well, I'm very interested to see your next project,
if you're going to tackle Vaticanus,
in the same zest.
David: Well, actually, this is just Part One.
The first book is Part One. Part One is,
Is what Tischendorf said happened, real?
Did it really happen? Could it have happened?
Or is there an alternative explanation?
That's this book.
The second book that I'm already working on,
and it's in our video series on YouTube right now,
is, "What really happened during those days?"
And then after that, is what happened after that,
and after that, is What happened to the people
who were the clingers to the King James?
How were they trying to get those people --
and still are today, trying to get those remaining people
away from the jot-and-tittle of the King James.
And that will go on. But in the midst of that,
there's either two possibilities. One:
In this next book I am working on now,
that the Vaticanus, once I finish with Sinaiticus,
the Vaticanus will start popping up at me,
or Two: Once I finish with this,
I'll do a whole new series and start on Vaticanus
and see what we find out!
Man: So it's good that there's more to come.
Auntie: Yes. Man: So definitely.
Thanks for watching. And get David's book.
And check out his vlogs on the Chick YouTube channel.
And go to chick.com to order the book.
So thank you David, for joining us,
and piquing everybody's interest in what's real
and what's fake.
So next time we'll see you on the Prophecy Brothers.
Thanks for watching!
Subscribe to our YouTube channel.
We are also on spreaker.com
-------------------------------------------
ไข่เน่า - ป๊อป นพรัตน์ [Cover Version] - Duration: 4:41.
For more infomation >> ไข่เน่า - ป๊อป นพรัตน์ [Cover Version] - Duration: 4:41. -------------------------------------------
WHAT I EAT IN A DAY VLOG || EXCITING NEWS!!! - Duration: 10:08.
Hey, guys, welcome back to my, channel it's just seen for those of you, who don't know, me and if you're, new?
Here before you do anything else hit that little subscribe button down below and then
Also turn on the little post notifications button next to it because it really supports, my channel so it's been a little
While since i've done like a
What i eat in a day vlog style video so i thought it would be fun to bring you guys, along
Today with, me and also because i have a few, new items or like?
Morning items that i think including in my diet so one of which is this drink that i just made which is my?
Mermaid, juice or a lexer or whatever you, want to call it but basically it is a liter of water
Have a squeezed lemon
two tablespoons of apple cider vinegar and then one tablespoon of ìiî live blue-green algae and
I have been really loving this it just kick-started, my digestion gives me a
Huge boost of antioxidants in the morning and it's really improved, my energy throughout
The, day, and also just drinking this much water in the morning helps me stay hydrated because
As the day goes on i get worse
And worse that drinking water so i try to drink a lot in the morning when i remember but
Basically i have mentioned the ìiî live in my valentine's day vlog, which i'll link
Above but it's a really great source of lots of vitamins and minerals
Omega-3s and it's just like i said it's supposed to really improve your
Concentration and your energy and i usually sip on this drink for about an hour or so before i eat anything just
Kickstart, my digestion and get everything going, and i'm usually not that hungry, when i first
Wake up so this is a really nice way to just kind of like, ease myself into the day, so i'm probably
Gonna just sip on this while i do a morning
Yoga, session with mitch, and we've been, using this, new app that i really, wanted to talk to you, guys
About it's called down dog, and i'm not sure if any of you have heard of it before but i can't even remember
Who i heard about it from it was somebody on youtube and it's basically like an at-home yoga app that takes you through
various series or flows and
I just think it's really great because there's like, so many different levels that you can
Choose there's different time lengths and different like types of flows so like a full flow. Quick flow
Restorative things like that for me it's just been one of the best at-home yoga apps and for those of you
Who might not have enough money to like spend on a yoga, membership and actually go to a
Studio i think is a really great alternative to at least get you
doing, yoga or just get on your mat and stretch because it's so good for us so i
Have really been liking this app and i just really just wanted to mention it because it's so great
Some things i need, to do today
Fold my laundry it's been sitting there staring at me for a few, days now and i just have
Not done it so that's on the docket for today
Secondly i need to get ready for work tomorrow
Because i have three shifts, and then i'm going to kelowna so i need to pack for kelowna as, well because
It's really hard to pack and like do anything when you are twelve hour
Shifts so i need
To get ready to do that before i start work wow i also think i am going to head to the gym
After i do my, yoga, i need, some breakfast i'm probably gonna do likes today so
Definitely need to feel a lot for that and i'll show
You, my, smoothie that i have before i head to the gym, and then lastly i'm gonna be posting, my vision, board video
Which will have already
Gone live on wednesday when i post this on saturday but
I'm really excited about this video and i hope you guys liked it or if you haven't
Watched it i'll put the little link up here and you can go check it out because i have one fun filming it anything you
Guys, will have fun
Okay, so my camera decided to die right as i was filming, my morning, smoothie that i've been having lately
So i'm just gonna tell
You, guys, what's in it because it's so delicious so i normally put two bananas two frozen bananas in it a cup of blueberries
a date a little bit of cinnamon a teaspoon, each of some maca powder and
Amla, powder which is also known as indian gooseberries and i did mention this in my antioxidants video which i will link as
well and then i also put a half a teaspoon of turmeric in it
i
Usually, put some vanilla
Protein in it right, now i'm using, my iron vegan protein i'm just kind of using it up i don't really love
That protein i normally, like, the bigga vanilla or coconut almond or?
Harmonized vegan vanilla protein, yeah and then i just put, some cashew
Milk in it and a little bit of water and a couple of pieces of ice and then
Blend it up and this is what it looks like it's like the most
Beautiful blue color and it just reminds, me of like a blueberry muffin or something fine and i've just been like, super obsessed with
The flavors so this, is what i've been having pretty much every, day, for the last couple weeks
Anyways i'm just going to do a, little bit of work on my computer and i will catch up to you at lunch time
i
Just got home from the gym, and i'm gonna
Be honest i'm so hungry right now, so i'm really excited to dive into this
Nail, that i just made but before i do i just wanted to talk about a couple things
so the first one is i know i didn't show, what's the full recipe for
The, white bean meatballs but, i will be posting that soon and that's the second thing that i wanted to talk about
which is
The fact that i am finally getting around to starting an actual blog
So i'm hoping to have it launched, by the end of this month or early next month and
I'm really excited, about it because i set an intention for this year to number one start my, own website and number two
Start a 30-day vegan starter kit so
Step one is starting, my, own blog and then, we will move on to step two but i just really wanted to
Tell you guys, about it because i'm really excited about it and i think that the website is coming along
And there will be lots of posts on there with lots of more detailed recipe posts and like product reviews
And all that kind of stuff so i'm really excited about it and i just wanted to tell you guys
Also if the filming is a little bit different, now i've been having, some troubles with, my, canon camera today, which
is the one that i normally film on it kind of
Broke, like halfway through filming, today so part of the footage is not from the other camera and then part of it is from
My, nikon, so if it looks different that's, why
But anyways i'm really hungry, and i'm gonna dive into this i didn't film, it but i'm gonna
Add lots of franks red hot sauce to it because it's really good with
So, yeah i'm probably just gonna eat this and do a little bit more work and
Start packing and then i'll catch up with you guys out there
Okay, so i just shared and i feel so much better i got really caught up in work and i you kind of forgot to?
Shower after lunch on the gyms i'm just enjoying, some soup and i know i didn't show?
You, guys, the recipe but that will be another recipe that's going up on my blog
So, you'll see it there soon but basically it's a banana squash, and sweet potato soup
As like the base it's kind of like a curried soup and then i just topped it with toasted almonds
Some hot sauce and some broccoli spouts and i love to include broccoli stuff in my diet
Pretty much every day, because they have so forth-- pain in them broccoli spouts are full of antioxidants
And they're just really good for you to consume on a, daily, basis, so yeah i'm gonna enjoy that
Probably, watch a show or do a little bit more work on computer and then i'll catch up with
You, later all right so it's a little bit later, and i'm just, gonna have like an after-dinner snack type thing
so i made these
peach
coconut muffins and
They turned out really, well i wasn't expecting them to i just kind of like put in whatever i had at
My, house, but they, did really turn out, well so i will be posting the recipe for those soon and then i'm also
Snacking on probably like, my, new, favorite snack but it's, these, pumpkin spice
date rolls and they're not new or anything but i just have never tried them and i recently bought them and
Yeah i probably bought them a couple, days, ago, and i'm almost on the entire box so
Gonna have to buy, some more of this and
Yeah, i'm probably just gonna end the video here because that's all i'm gonna be eating today
And i'm just gonna finish up watching the show
And then head to bed because i worked around so i hope you, guys, like, this video if you, did give it a
Thumbs up and don't forget to subscribe below
And turn on the little post notifications because it really supports, my channel i love you guys so much and i few minutes video bye
-------------------------------------------
Convex Earth : An invitation to Flat Earth, subtiteled - Duration: 3:54.
Hello people, good day.
Once again I am here to invite you
for the Convex Earth documentary
that will be on March 29 on the Internet
on the site terraconvexa.com.br, right?
But I also wanted to talk a minute with the people
the researchers of the Flat Earth. Look,
and I was watching a video of Leandro,
where he was mentioning a passage
Convex Earth: friend or enemy?
Allied or not?
Relax there people of the Flat Earth,
all researchers, we love your work,
continue in the fight, that's it, we have to show the truth.
We are together on this road, yes.
Convex Earth is ally and friend...
So we are tearing down the globe in the same way as you are too in this search here
Because the globe is a fantasy, it is a lie, there is no round spherical planet earth, this is impossible.
This is a fairy tale, so we are together on this road.
We like your research very much,
we watched several videos, right, that even helped us a lot in the other situations
where there is a different vision, of what people are talking about.
And we also receive stoning the same way you do, no. But there we face some
the difficulties when talking about Convex Earth. There is a difference from the Flat Earth,
with Convex Earth that is that
the flatness of the waters is verified in the same way that you
and that our name differs here in the continents, has a gentle inclination of the mountain, of the mountains
that's why the slight convexity of the continents, all right.
It is a difference but the rest is the same, we are in the same boat
looking for truth, passing that knowledge on to future generations, right.
So researchers from the Flat Earth, the Convex Earth the researchers, we are all allies we are in the same search, ok?
Hello people, Rafael Hungria speaking, investigator of Dakila researches.
I think it is important to underline that we, Dakila researchers, didn't receive help from any external group,
all the resources came from ourselves. We do not have a link with any group whatsoever
no society, no religious, scientific or governmental group.
Our investigations are independent.
Many people have said that we are being funded and whatever more, but that is not true, all right.
We are making our effort with our own resources.
We are here also to tell you that you can count on us for whatever is might be necessary
we can support them, you can count on us, let's say, participation too.
I invite you if you would like to assist the pre-première of the film here in São Paulo, for those who live in São Paulo, no,
We will also be in other countries, but here in São Paulo at Shopping Eldourado on March 26 at 19:30.
We already reserved your invitation and keep that available. We´ll receive you with open arms to show the world the reality of the facts, ok.
And it will contain a lot more than what is Convex Earth, or what is Flat Earth, all right.
We will have than much more revelations for the world and for future generations.
So, friends of the Flat Earth, researchers of the entire world, we invite you to enter into partnership with us,
we are going to walk together, we are going to carry out the investigations, we are going to join forces
to prove definitively that the earth is not a globe.
Ok people, a hug to you!
-------------------------------------------
🇭🇰 🇨🇱 CANTONESE IDIOMS CHALLENGE ft. Chile Lucas! 同智利仔做廣東話俚語小測驗! - Duration: 17:00.
Hi everyone, Cherry's here ( ^ ^ )/
and today we have a really special guest
and he is... (CC will be replaced by bilingual on-screen subs after this)
-------------------------------------------
Celebrities Who Almost Died - Duration: 6:15.
Celebrities seem like they'll live forever.
Perhaps it's because they possess unusual talent and good looks, or perhaps it's because
they somehow rose up above the human herd and made their dreams come true.
No matter the reason, it often feels like the rich and famous are downright invincible.
They're obviously not, of course.
Here are a few stars who've stared down the grim reaper and lived to tell the tale.
Ryan Reynolds
If you're planning a skydiving adventure anytime soon, you might not want to hear about Ryan
Reynolds' horrifying experience when he was just 19 years old.
He told Jimmy Fallon,
"I'm on my 13th jump, lucky number 13, my 'chute opened and what happened was [...] it
was just making me spin out of control and almost making me unconscious."
Fortunately, Reynolds says he finally pulled the backup parachute, but even that wasn't
enough to guarantee his safety.
He continued,
"You can't steer the reserve 'chute… so I landed like seven or eight miles away from
the actual drop zone.
I was sure I was going to land in power lines and I thought, 'What a way to go: you survive
a grand malfunction skydiving to burn to death.'"
Orlando Bloom
Lord of the Rings star Orlando Bloom revealed to Men's Health in 2011, that a three-story
fall left him paralyzed for four days when he was just 21 years old.
Bloom said he was trying to scale a drainpipe to climb onto a rooftop terrace with friends
when he fell.
The actor underwent multiple rounds of surgery and 18 months of physical therapy.
Reflecting on the dilemma years later, Bloom said,
"Fear is not a friend of mine.
But it's something to have a healthy awareness of.
I can't stop living.
It would ruin my creativity, the person I am."
Tracy Morgan
30 Rock star Tracy Morgan suffered life-threatening injuries and was in a coma for two weeks after
a truck crashed into his limo van on the New Jersey Turnpike in June 2014.
His friend and fellow passenger, James McNair, did not survive the accident and three others
were injured.
A year after the car crash, Morgan told Today about the tragic incident and his recovery,
saying,
"I can't believe I'm here.
I can't believe I'm in front of you.
I can't believe I'm just here, and just seeing the tragedy that happened.
It kinda… it touches me."
Morgan later told Complex that he "went to the other side" while in his coma, saying,
"This is not something I'm making up.
Do you know what God said to me?
He said, 'Your room ain't ready.
I still got something for you to do.'"
Mariska Hargitay
At age 3, Law & Order: SVU star Mariska Hargitay was in a car accident that killed her mother,
Jayne Mansfield.
According to the Los Angeles Times, Hargitay still has a zig-zag scar on her head from
the 1967 incident.
Decades later, Hargitay discussed her mother's passing with Redbook magazine, saying,
"Losing my mother at such an early age is the scar of my soul.
But I feel like it ultimately made me into the person I am today."
On an episode of Inside the Actors Studio, Hargitay also said it helped her find belief
in God.
"I believe that there are no accidents, and I believe that God has a plan, and I have
a very deep belief in God."
"I've learned to make peace with what is."
Joaquin Phoenix
Within the span of one week in early 2006, Joaquin Phoenix experienced one of the best
and worst things to ever happen in his life.
A few days before he earned an Academy Award nomination for his portrayal of Johnny Cash
in Walk the Line, Phoenix was involved in a terrible car accident in Los Angeles.
According to the L.A. Times, while driving in Laurel Canyon, the brakes on Phoenix's
car reportedly gave out and the actor swerved to avoid hitting another vehicle, flipping
his own car.
The actor was still conscious, as he lay in the wreckage.
That's when he heard acclaimed German filmmaker Werner Herzog knocking on his window.
Phoenix recalled,
"There was this German voice saying, 'Just relax.'
I said to myself, 'That's Werner Herzog!'
There's something so calming and beautiful about Werner Herzog's voice."
"Read, read, read (x infinity)... if you don't read you'll never be a filmmaker."
Herzog, who reportedly lived near the scene of the accident, helped Phoenix out of the
automobile.
Phoenix said,
"I got out of the car and I said, 'Thank you'...And he was gone."
Sharon Stone
Actress Sharon Stone was one of the biggest sirens of the '90s.
After Basic Instinct and The Specialist, most people with a pulse either wanted to be with
her, or be just like her.
The movie star always exuded an unflappable confidence, but that couldn't spare her the
sudden loss of just about everything.
In 2001, Stone felt a pain in her head so severe that she sought medical attention,
convinced that she'd suffered a brain hemorrhage.
It turned out, it was a lethal aneurysm.
She said on an episode of Oprah's Master Class,
"I had to learn to walk, hear, write, talk, remember, and everything all over again."
Stone's condition reportedly destroyed her career and marriage, and even cost her custody
of her child.
But the event also changed her for the better.
She said,
"You know, death isn't all it's cracked up to be.
Everything got better for me through this experience."
Leonardo DiCaprio
The world's childhood crush has almost lost his life several times, like when he got mauled
by a bear.
Okay, that happened in The Revenant, but DiCaprio can lend some verisimilitude to his stunning
performances thanks to a near-fatal experience on one of his globetrotting adventures.
DiCaprio told Wired that while he was diving in South Africa using an underwater cage,
a great white shark became trapped in the enclosure.
He recalled,
"They leave the tops open and you have a regulator line running to the surface.
Then they chum the water with tuna.
A wave came and the tuna sort of flipped up into the air.
A shark jumped up and grabbed the tuna, and half its body landed inside the cage with
me."
That's when the shark reportedly started snapping its jaws at DiCaprio.
"I'm gonna eat that hairy leg…I'm gonna eat that one too.
Oh I can see right up them shorts."
The shark ultimately flipped itself back out of the cage.
DiCaprio said,
"I have it on video.
It's insane."
Thanks for watching!
Click the Nicki Swift icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!
-------------------------------------------
Scandal - Koisuru Universe (PtBr/English/Español) HD 1080p - Duration: 4:26.
For more infomation >> Scandal - Koisuru Universe (PtBr/English/Español) HD 1080p - Duration: 4:26. -------------------------------------------
Mango Shake Recipe Mango Milkshake Recipe | How To Make Mango Milk Shake - Duration: 1:40.
For more infomation >> Mango Shake Recipe Mango Milkshake Recipe | How To Make Mango Milk Shake - Duration: 1:40. -------------------------------------------
¿Perdió dinero enviándolo por Western Union? Vea cómo puede recuperarlo - Duration: 2:24.
For more infomation >> ¿Perdió dinero enviándolo por Western Union? Vea cómo puede recuperarlo - Duration: 2:24. -------------------------------------------
Los Piropos: ¿Una manera de halagar o de acosar a las mujeres? - Duration: 2:25.
For more infomation >> Los Piropos: ¿Una manera de halagar o de acosar a las mujeres? - Duration: 2:25. -------------------------------------------
भोपळ्याचे घारगे | Bhoplyache Gharge | Sweet Red Pumpkin Puris (Puffs) | भोपळ्याचे वडे - Duration: 5:26.
hi friends welcome to my channel kitchen to kitchen today I'm gonna share
with you Bhoplyache Gharge or sweet pumpkin puris recipe these are very
easy to make and can be a great snack item or a kid's lunch box item hope you
like it let's look at the ingredients I have taken here 2 cups of grated pumpkin
1 cup of rice flour 1 cup of wheat flour
and one cup of grated jaggery
for some seasoning I'm using nutmeg powder some cardamom powder is to give
nice flavor to any sweet recipe some oil about 2 to 3 teaspoons and 1/2 a
teaspoon of salt
put the flame to medium high and add about two teaspoons of clarified butter
or ghee in the pan as it melts add in the grated pumpkin so just drop all of
that in and start sauteing it
saute it for about a minute or so
cover and cook it for three to five minutes have turn the flame to low after
five minutes notice that the pumpkin has become a little mushy so give it a quick
stir you know kind of breaking if any big lumps are there
add in the jaggery and some nutmeg powder mix it really well I have turned
the flame back to medium so you'll start noticing that the jaggery starts to melt
pretty fast so just keep starting like that you know breaking any big lumps and
the mixture has kind of become a little watery now we'll cover and cook it for
three to five minutes after five minutes let's open and give it a quick stir
notice that the jaggedy and pumpkin have really come together and our mixture is
ready go ahead and switch off the flame a white plate that you can use to knead
the dough so in the plate take all of that pumpkin and jaggery mixture and
kind of spread it like that so that it kind of you know cools down a bit add in
the rice flour and in the wheat flour
about four to five teaspoons of oil
and half a teaspoon of salt now we are going to make a nice medium soft - we
don't need to add any water while mixing this so just with the watery mixture of
pumpkin and jaggery this should all come together and you should have a nice sort
to just add in some oil here is our dough ready we are going to let it rest
for about 30 minutes
to make the Gharge or the Puri here I have taken a ziploc pack and I have cut
it on three sides so it creates an opening like this and we are going to
roll the puris in this plastic bag I am adding a drop of oil so that our
puris don't stick to this plastic base take a ball as much as the size of a
small lemon and then again just add one drop of oil on top as well cover it and
now the dough ball is between the two plastic covers with the help of a roller
just very gently roll it to make it as the size of a poori
so the car gays are usually a little thicker than a regular Puri so you know
very gently just keep rolling like that and you should have medium thick poori
ready I have already kept oil for heating up
and it's pretty hot now I've checked it by adding a small dough piece in there
so let's go ahead and I drop our rolled karaage
notice that it immediately kind of starts to you know fry really well so
just turning on the sides like that it will start to puff up flip it and you
know cook on the side few seconds and just
turn it again and it's ready take it out in a plate while frying any sweet item
always keep your flame on a medium low medium because if you fry it on a high
flame there are chances that your item can turn black pretty fast so I have
fried all these pooris/puris on a medium-low frame hope you've enjoyed today's recipe
please don't forget to Like subscribe and comment thank you
-------------------------------------------
#227 Easy Rangoli Design with 3*2 Dots | Simple Kolam Designs | Easy MUggulu Designs | Easy Kolam - Duration: 3:47.
Daily Rangoli Designs
-------------------------------------------
Dominique Le Grange - Head of Marketing - Duration: 4:58.
For more infomation >> Dominique Le Grange - Head of Marketing - Duration: 4:58. -------------------------------------------
SCANDAL - Image (PtBr/Español/English) HD 1080p - Duration: 5:58.
For more infomation >> SCANDAL - Image (PtBr/Español/English) HD 1080p - Duration: 5:58. -------------------------------------------
Alexia - The Music I Like (1998) Videoclip, Music Video, Lyrics Included - Duration: 3:38.
Your love is coming into my life
It makes me feel good inside
I need a moment of ecstasy
Feeling higher than high
This is the music I like
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
Your love is coming into my life
It makes me feel good inside
I need a moment of ecstasy
Feeling higher than high
I want to live with my fantasy
Dancing into the light
And I can play with my destiny
It makes me feel satisfied
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
A fire is burning inside of me
Feel the rhythm of life
I need your loving to set me free
I want you to stay by my side
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
This is the music I like...
Your love is coming into my life
It makes me feel good inside
I need a moment of ecstasy
Feeling higher than high
This is the music I like
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét