Right now Expressen is conducting a witch-hunt against Swedish Google, to make them censor YouTube.
It's so bad that "Reporters without borders" criticize Bonnier for their censorship demands.
It all started with them getting Gransking Sveriges channel shut down, because GS did the same as mainstream-media.
They call people and hold them accountable for their "ugly" opinions. But Expressen wants a patent on this doxxing model.
So they used their paper to extort Google via threats of bad publicity, and it worked, sadly.
Then they went after the Nordic Resistence Movement, I don't think many people wept here, but the point isn't Nordfront's gross opinions.
The point is that it starts with them, and ends with you, because then they demanded censorship of historical documents, like Nazi propaganda.
And now they want immigration critique down too, for example FriaTiders upload of Trump talking Sweden and immigration.
Something that, despite all, was a public conference between two nation leaders.
So it went from shutting down nazis, to deleting anything that might benefit SD in the election. Or anything critical of the migration policy the past years.
Expressen are so desperate they translated their articles to poor English, to put as much pressure on Google as possible.
And this shows why freedom of speech must apply to ugly opinions as well.
Because otherwise you get this purity-OCD that ends with nobody being allowed to speak critically of the establishments worldview.
And since establishments can change and be replaced, liberals might as well get oppressed in the future.
Because when you use these tactics against your adversaries, don't be surprised when they wanna do the same back.
And the most obvious here is contempt for the people. Expressen really hate ordinary humans.
They think that you, who use YouTube, are so dumb you could get brainwashed by 70 years old Hitler-movies.
Seriously, what's so dangerous about this material? It's even something you get to see in film studies.
It's educational to view propaganda from totalitarian states.
Censoring history is dangerous, because if we can't learn from history we're doomed to repeat it's mistakes.
And do note how manipulative this angle is: "YouTube SPREADING Hitler's movies"
YouTube isn't spreading anything. Old media is so ancient and irrelevant they don't even get the internet.
A search engine isn't an editor. YouTube offers a server of videos with no analysis of the contents.
This is called freedom. Because it means people can watch stuff they're interested in, whether they agree with the content or not.
And people aren't so dumb they change their entire worldview in a second, just because of a YouTube video. People CAN think.
Aaand now I see they're trying to blame Youtube for the school massacre in Trollhättan.
The article heavily implies one of my videos drew the perpetrator insane.
Hm, that's interesting. Because I use Expressen as a source in my videos.
So if I'm responsible for mass murder, it's reasonable that Expressen would be as well.
Or is it only okay with immigration critique when massmedia does it?
The hypocrisy is enormous considering Expressen literally defends convicted terrorists.
When Göteborgspostens writer noted the inappropriate with NOT criticizing a city hall for their dealings with convicted terrorists,
Expressen came to defense and compared her to McCarthy. A bit rich.
And let's not forget that time Expressen let a very hate-filled woman ponder loudly, as to whether "nazi brown-rats" like Hanif Bali should be rid with poison.
Or why not that time they doxxed a heart-sick pensioner, even though they knew it could lead to her being murdered?
After all, it's not like Expressen has good enough view of mankind to lecture others on what's decent.
Expressen don't engage in honest argumentation, instead it's ugly, low tactics.
Thomas Mattsson tries to extort Google by talking about how they're jews, and that jews should know the importance of censorship.
Because otherwise they're bad jews that haven't learned from history, that's basically the implication of his reasoning.
So it's not just people in general Expressen look down upon, jews specifically are a group they hold to very low standards.
It's crazy I have to point this out to you at Expressen, but jews can condone freedom of speech too.
But it's not just about misanthropy and antisemitism from Expressen, let's not forget the business aspect.
Bonnier-owned Expressen are very upset that people can hear Hitler speeches on YouTube,
while Bonnier sell Hitler propaganda themselves. Expensive too.
And Youtube is a competitor to Bonnier, who offers this material for free, something that probably matters considering Bonnier is losing profit overall.
In other words, nazism is okay if Bonnier can make money off it. Otherwise it ruins democracy.
And Expressen wants to argue that it's not the same, it's about context, on Youtube there's clips arguing FOR Hitler's worldview.
Okay. So when Bonnier sells Hitlers autobiography there's no argumentation for his worldview there?
It's actually embarrassing how foreign the internet is for old media. Expressen wrote this long article about the dangers of old nazi propaganda,
Then when you look at the views one of the movies only has 2000. Another has 19'000, and NMR's channel only has 11'000 subs.
I understand this might sound like much to a dinosaur who doesn't get technology, but 2000 views is a piss in the ocean.
I couldn't even get that little if I tried. I'd even say 20'000 views is a piss in the ocean.
If I'd upload a video of me taking a shit, and reading a Donald Duck comic, that would get more views than any of this.
The point is that this isn't really about nazi propaganda, it's just a lever to get where you really wanna get, which this article reveals.
I quote: "In six months Sweden goes to election. Now a defector reveals how Youtubes algorithms easily can be manipulated to influence the election."
Then they describe how FriaTiders movie with Trump is played up after a video with Stefan Löfven.
Or how Sweden Democrats election movie comes up after videos with Center Party's Annie Lööf.
In other words, they describe a completely normal, functional algorithm as "manipulation".
Not even psychopaths are this dishonest. Of course political clips get played up alongside political clips.
And when some clips are more popular than others, of course they will be recommended over unpopular ones.
If you search various party leaders and sort after views, Jimmie Åkesson (SD) has 6 million views on the first 10 clips. Stefan Löfven (S) has 3, and Annie Lööf(C) has 2.
SD is interesting to people, and that's not strange considering how much the media has covered up over the years.
YOU created this. Even on Expressens opinion page one of their writers admitted to building the overton window, and she felt it was a mistake.
And journalists know they failed with reporting migration fairly, they say it up-front nowadays.
People search SD to make up their own mind. Not because Youtube has an evil algorithm.
On the contrary, Youtube give people what they want. And I don't understand your point.
You want people who use YouTube to be force-fed videos by the unpopular Center Party instead? That sounds more artificial and manipulative than anything.
Right now it's a self-regulating system where videos are highlighted based on the people's will.
You at Expressen wanna turn Youtube into a megaphone for liberals instead.
So it's not weird that both the Moderates, Center Party and Liberals cheer Expressens article. It's all about them not losing votes to nationalists.
Of course Annie Lööf is horrified by how Youtube works. It reflects reality, which is that most people dislike her party.
So liberal Expressen is just conducting opinion-making for liberal Center Party and liberal Moderates.
There is no actual Youtube scandal. There's just a paper that wants people to vote for their parties.
And now, the Moderates and Liberals (party) want to call Youtube to parliament for QUESTIONING.
To investigate their "responsibility", because that's what you do when you love democracy right?
And these are the same parties claiming to be the opposition to the PC-hysteria we've seen the past years.
They act like they're different from the lefties, when they think the same on everything important.
And the Green Party want to widen the law, of course, because they only care about freedom for islamists.
And sadly, Google listened, because now they're gonna introduce a special Swedish version of Google.
Similar to what they have in China, a specially adjusted internet, so by this point I should tip that Google is not the only search engine out there.
You can also use DuckDuckGo, Bing or Startpage, to name a few.
Considering Google is gonna censor search results, there's reason to use other services too.
If I may regress to Thomas Mattssons dubious view of jews, all jews don't think the same.
Sure there are hysterical SJWs amongst jews, like with any other people. But there's also those who want to protect the speech that attacks them the most.
If I may quote a famous jewish woman: "Communists and nazis are different variants of the same evil, which is collectivism."
"But both should be allowed to speak freely. Because evil ideas can only be dangerous in the absence of better ideas."
Censorship is not the answer. To give people better alternatives, and better perspectives, is.
And if you think hateful videos are a problem, allow video responses. Because otherwise you never address the bad ideas.
And then they can't be destroyed. All that happens then is they keep growing, but somewhere else, and stronger - for real.
It's hidden racism that's most dangerous, not obvious racism.
As an immigrant I want to know who hates immigrants, because then I know who to avoid.
Information can never be dangerous. Allowing people to speak freely can only create better foundations for better decisions.
And now I want to speak directly to Google: I hope you understand that Expressen doesn't represent the people.
It doesn't even seem they use Youtube, considering their poor understanding of popularity and your functions.
They don't even understand that you can turn off the automatic playback they get so hysterical over in their article.
And just look how few people care about their articles. 438 shares. That's pathetic.
I get more on my Facebook posts and I'm not even that famous.
Sure, this one got 712 but that's still not fancy considering this is Sweden's biggest paper.
And I'd guess half that number is people angry over how dumb the article is, while the other half is happy journos.
In any case this number isn't high enough to listen to.
Ordinary people are your customers, and it's ordinary people you should listen to. And they want more diversity online, not less.
I don't say this often enough, but I really love Youtube.
I love how many interesting and odd clips there are, both educational and entertaining. I've laughed so much thanks to Youtube, I've learnt so much.
And ordinary people, humans in general, are not stupid enough to think the earth is flat just because they found a Flat Earth-video on your platform.
And people generally aren't stupid enough to think nazis are a big threat online, when they only have 11'000 subs and basically nobody watches them.
Don't be fooled by their lies. There's no proof your brand has been damaged in anyone's eyes, other than Expressens office.
Don't take the Bonnier-paper Dagens Industri seriously, because they're owned by Bonnier, as well as all other papers that attacked you.
Because Bonnier are losing profit and that's why they're doing all this, because they're scared of YOU.
Don't be fooled by the media power-illusion, old media is losing audiences and revenue every passing year.
Youtube is the future, mainstream-media isnt.
Since Youtube is more integrated with the human nature of free will and diversity of ideas.
That's what makes Youtube so nice, that they don't preach what you should think, like MSM does.
That they're not shaming you for your interests and values.
Don't become the media, because then you will lose both audiences and revenue like they're doing.
And that seems to be the goal. This is a great article by Rebecca Uvell you should read. Let me quote the most important part:
"The goal of this propaganda since 2013 is to make politicians force Google & Facebook to hire editorials."
"Thus making them media companies. If they get their wish granted they will have eradicated social media."
"Then it will be, yet again, an editor that decides which opinions are allowed to be expressed."
"Just like 'the good ole days' when nobody could reach people, unless they were approved by the media."
Speaks for itself. Nothing has embarrassed established media more than social media.
Nothing has exposed their lies, fake news and corrupt journalism more than social media and alternative media.
Don't listen to your competition, Google, because that's a certain way to go under as a company.
In Expressen's article there's a mail to contact them, if you wanna leave tips. I'm gonna do just that.
"Hey Expressen, my tip to you is to keep making ridiculous media-attacks that undermine your trust"
"Because it's hardly a coincidence your readers are fleeing to FriaTider."
"I personally benefit from you writing desperate, antisemitic fake 'reports' to try and lure people to the Center Party"
"The same party responsible for Swedens first sharia court. Nothing benefits your opposition more than your hysterial behavior right now."
"And I look forward to the day your office shuts down in shame and anxiety."
"And you realize a youtube-blogger who drinks beer all day had a better grip of reality than you."
"Until then I'll personally make sure less people read your dishonest opinion-making masked as journalism. And I won't have to work hard!"
And "NAMASTE", and post, and THERE!
Have a nice day everyone!
For more infomation >> Dispatcher on leave after social media posts - Duration: 1:01. 
For more infomation >> Exercícios 3 Tontura Vertigem Labirintite Síndrome de Ménière Clínica Fisioterapia Dr. Robson Sitta - Duration: 2:59. 
For more infomation >> Что я понял к 30 годам ... Откровения тренера по харизме и отношениям - Duration: 20:25. 
For more infomation >> Как привлечь деньги с помощью человеческой энергии - Duration: 9:02. 
For more infomation >> How to Clean With Cream of Tartar - Easy Does It - HGTV - Duration: 1:31. 
For more infomation >> Вязание крючком. ПУЛОВЕР. РАЗБОР УЗОРА+СХЕМА. - Duration: 19:29. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét