Yoongi, I miss you!
Me too :3
-------------------------------------------
OLED Burn-in Test Update Week 4 - Rtings.com - Duration: 4:33. For more infomation >> OLED Burn-in Test Update Week 4 - Rtings.com - Duration: 4:33.-------------------------------------------
JAZZ E POP NA IRLANDA COM POSTMODERN JUKEBOX - Duration: 13:58. For more infomation >> JAZZ E POP NA IRLANDA COM POSTMODERN JUKEBOX - Duration: 13:58.-------------------------------------------
⭐️⭐️⭐️1. Deutscher Steemit Online-Kongress - Official Trailer ⭐️⭐️⭐️ - Duration: 1:41.we spend a lot of time on social media we are the ones who create their content
but who benefits from all the time energy and creativity we put into
blogging tweeting and sharing pictures and videos only the shareholders of big
corporations enter Steve but Steve is a new form of
social network that returns the benefits to you when you create content that
people like you get rewarded even for commenting and uploading rewards are
paid in steam the network's built-in digital currency it's similar to Bitcoin
but it's much easier to use you can freely exchange steam for dollars euros
bitcoins or other currencies or you can keep it as steam power that's like a
share of the network the more you own the higher the weight of your vote more
and more websites and apps are based on steam our unique reward system
encourages people to produce high quality content and not just deaky stuff
also art food fashion poetry on Steve people share what they care about so you
can really get to know them it's a global community with a small-town
feeling be part of it
you
you
-------------------------------------------
Why Are Wet Dogs Smelly? - Duration: 4:00.[ INTRO ]
Squeaks and I made a new friend yesterday!
Her name is Cassie, and she's a puppy!
She loves to play fetch, go for walks, and roll in dirt.
It's so exciting to make a new friend, and we had a great time playing with Cassie in
the mud.
But after we were done playing, Cassie really needed a bath.
So we filled up a bathtub with warm water and soap to wash away the dirt from Cassie's
fur and get her nice and clean.
But after her bath, Cassie's fur smelled kind of funny.
[Squeaks squeaks]
Yeah, she was pretty stinky.
She hadn't smelled nearly as much before her bath, which seemed weird because normally,
soap and water make things stop smelling.
So if Cassie was all clean now, shouldn't that have made her smell better?
Squeaks and I wanted to make sure she was okay, so we did some research.
And it turns out, almost all dogs smell after getting wet — even if they just had a bath!
That's because of what's in their fur.
A microscope is a tool that lets you zoom in on something really closely to see tiny
things that would be too small to see otherwise.
And if you use a powerful microscope to look very closely at a dog's fur, you'll find
that there are lots of small living things in their fur.
We call these microbes, which just means tiny living things.
These microbes are so small, we can't see them without help from a microscope.
Some of the microbes in the fur are yeast, a type of fungus.
Others are bacteria that help keep a dog's skin healthy.
[Squeaks squeaks worriedly]
Don't worry, Squeaks, we don't need to get rid of these microbes.
They are a lot like germs, but they don't mean that a dog is sick or hurt.
They're good germs!
Microbes actually live all over the place — we just can't see them because they're
so small.
Most of the microbes on Cassie's fur won't bother her, and some of them can even be very
helpful.
But microbes sometimes leave things behind.
You already know that when big animals like you and me eat food, we leave behind anything
our bodies can't use when we go to the toilet.
Well, microbes do the same thing!
Except without actual toilets, of course.
We call what they leave behind waste, and there are bits of it wherever they live — including
in Cassie's fur.
It's so teeny-tiny that we don't notice it at first, or its smell.
But then something happens that makes it more noticeable.
[Squeaks has an idea: the bath!]
Exactly!
The water in the bathtub got the waste all wet.
Lots of things are smellier when they get wet.
Just think about what happens when you leave wet shoes lying around!
Water helps smelly things move around more, get into the air more, and get into our noses
faster.
So when we gave Cassie a bath, we got rid of the dirt and mud on her fur coat, but we
also stirred up all of the stinky waste.
That made it easier for us to smell, even though Cassie was much cleaner.
[Squeaks squeaks a question]
Good question, Squeaks!
There are actually some really easy ways to get rid of that wet dog smell really quickly.
First, if your dog gets wet, you can dry them off with towels or a hair dryer set to blow
cool air.
That stops the water from spreading the smell of the waste.
Plus you can give your dog's fur a cool hairstyle at the same time!
Cassie smelled a lot better once we dried her off.
There's also special dog shampoo you can use to give a dog a bath, without as much
of the smell getting into the air.
[Squeaks is relieved]
I'm glad that Cassie is clean and healthy, too, and I'm so excited to learn more about
the microbes that live all over our world.
Maybe we can do some more research later.
But first, I think Cassie is ready for another game of fetch!
Thanks for joining us!
If you want to keep learning and having fun with Squeaks and me, hit the subscribe button,
and we'll see you next time here at the Fort!
[ Outro ]
-------------------------------------------
Crochet Horse Tutorial - Duration: 39:37.Hello everyone, thank you for joining me. I'm Kerri.
Today I'll be showing you how to crochet this horse. It's to go with our barnyard
animals. I've had a few requests over the time for a horse.
Now the materials I'll be using are four ply crochet cotton, my light brown
is the main color, my dark brown is for the tail and the mane, the white is for
the face marking, and the black is for the hooves. I've also got sewing cotton
and a sewing needle to stitch it together, a 1.25 millimeter
crochet hook, a darning needle to weave in my ends and scissors. Now I'll start with
the head and my light brown. I make a magic loop and work one chain and seven
single crochet into the circle.
I pull the circle tight and join with a slip stitch in the chain. For row two I
start with one chain and work a single crochet in the same place as the chain
and then work one single crochet into each of the next four stitches,
and then work one chain and turn. For row three I work one chain and work one single
crochet into each stitch across,
and I've got five single crochet. For row four I work one chain and work one single
crochet into each stitch across to the last stitch and I work two single
crochet into the last stitch.
For row five I work one chain and turn, and work one single crochet into each stitch
across until the last stitch and I work two single crochet into the last stitch.
For row six I work one chain and turn, and I work one single crochet into each stitch
across.
For row seven I work one chain and turn. I work a joined single crochet over the first
two stitches, one single crochet into each stitch until the last two stitches,
and a joined single crochet over the last two stitches. For row eight I work
one chain and turn and work one single crochet into each stitch.
For row nine I work one chain and turn. I work a joined single crochet over the
first two stitches, one single crochet into the next stitch and a joined single
crochet over the remaining two stitches.
For row ten I work one chain and turn, and I work one single crochet into each of the
stitches, and that's the head done. We don't fasten off. We're going to do a
neatening row now. So we start with one chain and work one single crochet into
each stitch, right around the head. So I'll work around the head.
I won't fasten off when I get round to here. We'll start on the first ear. When
I get round to the beginning of the row I slip stitch into the one chain and
then slip stitch into the following stitch, and work three chain, and a
joined double crochet into the same place as the chain, and the next stitch,
and fasten off. The other ear will be worked in these two stitches before the
next corner. So I'll join into this stitch here, work
three chain and work a joined double crochet in the same place as the chain
and the next stitch, and fasten off,
and that's the head done. I'll start on the white marking now. So I make a magic
loop, and into my circle I work three chain and one double crochet.
I pull the circle tight but I don't join. For row two I work three chain and
turn, and I work one double crochet into the first stitch and one double
crochet into the top of the three chain.
For row three I start with three chain and I work one double crochet into
each stitch and one double crochet into the top of the three chain, and that's
the marking done. I'll fasten off.
For this front mane part, using my dark brown I work seven chain.
I miss the first chain and work a slip stitch in the second. I work a single
crochet into the next stitch and a half double crochet into the following stitch.
I slip stitch into the next stitch and work four chain. I miss the first chain
and work a slip stitch into the next,
a single crochet into the following stitch, and then a half double crochet
into the next,
and then I miss one stitch on the original chain and slip stitch into the
next. Then I work three chain. I miss the first, I work a single crochet into the
next and a half double crochet into the next stitch,
and then slip stitch into the last stitch of the original chain, and fasten
off. I'll start with the body now. I'm going to start up behind the head. I
start with four chain. I miss the first chain and work one single crochet into
each of the remaining chain.
For rows two to four I work one chain and work one single crochet into each
stitch. That was for rows two to four.
For row five I work one chain and turn and I work one single crochet into each
stitch, and then I work fifteen chain.
That's for the back part. Now I miss the first chain and I work one single
crochet into each chain and then along the neck part.
Now rows seven, eight, and nine are worked the same. I work one chain and turn and
work two single crochet into the first stitch, and one single crochet into each
stitch to the end. So I'll work rows seven, eight and nine with one chain and two single
crochet in the first stitch and one single crochet into each stitch to the
end, and then I'll be back. For row ten we start with one chain and turn and we
work one single crochet into each stitch.
For row eleven we work one chain and turn, we work a joined single crochet over
the first two stitches. Then work one single crochet into each stitch until we
get to the last two stitches,
and we work a joined single crochet over the last two stitches. For row twelve we
work one chain and turn and we work one single crochet into each stitch to the
end.
For row thirteen we work one chain and turn, we work a joined single crochet over the
first two stitches, and then we work one single crochet into each stitch until we
get to the last two stitches,
and we work a joined single crochet over the last two stitches. Now we're going to
start on the back leg. We work one chain and turn. We work two single crochet in
the first stitch, and a joined single crochet over the next two stitches, and
then work one chain and turn. We work a joined single crochet over the first two
stitches, and then two single crochet into the next stitch. For row sixteen
we work one chain and turn and we work a joined single crochet over the first two
stitches, and two single crochet into the next stitch. For row seventeen we work
one chain and turn. We work two single crochet into the first stitch, and a
joined single crochet over the next two stitches. For row eighteen we work one
chain and turn and work a joined single crochet over the first two stitches, and
two single crochet into the next stitch. For row nineteen we work one chain and turn. We
work a joined single crochet over the first two stitches and now we work a
joined single crochet into the same place as the last part of the joined
single crochet and the last stitch, so we have two stitches left.
For row twenty we work one chain and turn and work a single crochet into each stitch.
And for row twenty-one we work one chain and turn and work a joined single crochet
into each stitch, and fasten off,
and that's the back leg done. For the front leg we join three stitches back
from the front, just in there, and work one chain. Work a joined single crochet
over the first two stitches and then two single crochet into the next stitch. For
row two we work one chain and turn. We work two single crochet into the first
stitch and a joined single crochet over the next two stitches. For row three we
work one chain and turn and work a joined single crochet over the first two
stitches, and two single crochet into the next stitch. For row four we work one chain
and turn, we work two single crochet into the first stitch and a joined single
crochet over the next two stitches.
For row five we work one chain and turn. We work a joined single crochet over the first
two stitches, and then we work a joined single crochet into the same place
as the last part of the joined single crochet and the next stitch. So we've got
two stitches left. For rows six and seven we work one chain and turn and work a
single crochet into each stitch.
For row eight we work one chain and turn and we work a single crochet into
each stitch and that's the second leg, the front leg finished. We're going to do
a neatening row now. So I don't fasten off. Now I prefer to work slip stitch
down the legs, just to make it a bit thinner so the legs don't get too fat,
but if you'd rather work single crochet that's okay. So a slip
stitch into each stitch down the leg or a single crochet if you'd prefer.
Now into the body I work a single crochet into the first two stitches, a
half double crochet into the next stitch, a double crochet into each of the next
two stitches,
and a half double crochet into each of the following two,
and then a single crochet into the remaining ones on the body.
Now I'll just work a slip stitch into each stitch around the leg. I'll work a
single crochet along the top to make it easier to do my hoof and once I
get to about here I'll start working single crochets up to the back. So I'll
work around to the back and I'll meet you there.
Now I'm to the back, I've worked one single crochet into the first stitch on the
back. Now I work one half double crochet and then into the next stitch I work one
double crochet and then I work one half double crochet into each of the next
two stitches. Now I continue working single crochet around until I get to the
leg. Once I get to the leg I'll work a slip stitch up and so I'll finish my
neatening row and I'll be back. At the end of the row I join with a slip stitch and
fasten off,
and that's the horse's body done. I'll start on the mane now. I start with twelve
chain,
and work a slip stitch in the second chain from the hook, and then work a
single crochet into the next stitch, a half double crochet in the following
stitch, and a double crochet into each of the next two stitches,
and then slip stitch into the next chain.
Now I work five chain and slip stitch into the second chain from the hook.
I work a single crochet in the following stitch, then a half double crochet in the
next and a double crochet into the next.
On my original chain I miss one stitch and slip stitch into the next. Now I work
four chain, and work a slip stitch in the second chain from the hook, a single
crochet into the next stitch and then a half double crochet into the following
stitch, and then I slip stitch into the last chain on my original chain, and
that's the mane.
I'll start on the tail now. I start with fourteen chain.
I work a single crochet in the second chain from the hook. Work a joined single
crochet over the next two stitches, one single crochet in the next stitch, a half
double crochet into each of the next six stitches,
a single crochet in the next stitch,
three single crochet into the following stitch,
and a slip stitch into the last chain,
and then work three chain. For row two I work a slip stitch in the second chain from the
hook, and then two single crochet into the following stitch.
Now I turn it and work into the back of my previous row. I work one single crochet
into each of the first two stitches,
one half double crochet into each of the next six stitches,
one single crochet into each of the next two stitches, and a slip stitch into the
next stitch and then we turn.
We work one chain, miss the first stitch and slip stitch into the next stitch, and
then work a single crochet in the next stitch, a half double crochet into the
following stitch and then one double crochet into each of the next four
stitches,
two half double crochet into the next stitch,
one half double crochet into the following stitch, a single crochet into
the next and then a slip stitch into each of the following two stitches,
and fasten off,
and that's the tail done. If you preferred you could just thread some
cotton or wool for the tail and the mane, but I didn't think it would wash up very
well so I decided to crochet mine this time. Now for the hoof we join our
cotton at the end of the leg, and work three chain. Work a double crochet in the
same place as our chain and then one double crochet into each stitch across,
and fasten off, and the other hoof is worked the same. I'll just work the other
hoof and weave in my ends and I'll be back to put it together. Now here's all
my pieces. The first thing I'll do is attach the marking to the head. That will
go in there and I'll also embroider on the nostrils. I'm going to stitch on the
eyes now. I'm going to use the black cotton, four ply, that I use for the hoof
and then I'll put a little white dot in the middle. I'll also put on the little
bit of mane for the front. Now the head is finished, so I'll attach that to the body.
It just goes on like that and slopes back a bit.
I'll also attach the tail to the body and then I'll stitch the mane at the
back just between the ear and the body, just in there. I just stitch it along
the back, and there's the finished horse. If you liked my video please like,
subscribe, and share. I'm also on Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Twitter.
The details are in the description below along with details of my website. I have
all my patterns up on my website. Thank you for watching, see you next time. Bye.
-------------------------------------------
Cyberpunk 2077 Minigame - Duration: 5:37.Greetings earthlings!
Wecolme to the MadQueen show!
I am your host the MadQueen
On today's menu, we have a new Cyberpunk 2077 news?
Well, this is not news and not new, but this is a video for you, as you know that being
your most annoying Cyberpunk 2077 YouTuber is my
personal responsibility
And today we're going to talk again about the Cyberpunk minigame I've been talking
about so much lately
It all started with a leak reported past October by our favorite leakers the Triple S league,
that a minigame of Cyberpunk 2077 was on the works, although it wasn't very clear back
then if we were talking about a mini-game inside the main game or a standalone game
People didn't seem to pay much attention to this leak, but as I'm annoying as fuck
I kept dreaming with my theories of a stand-alone minigame in the universe of Cyberpunk 2077,
something more or less like Gwent is for the Witcher 3, and the thing is that I'm not
the only one thinking that is a good idea
Braindance: The Experience
Welcome to a world of wonder and excitement
The most advanced neurocoordinators
the most exciting braindance recordings
the best escape you've ever experienced
Only in Playland at the Sea, Pacifica, Night City
Braindance: The Experience
In past week Sunday's video, or I can't remember the day
we talked about the conference that CD Projekt CEO Adam Kiciński and the member of the board
Piotr Nielubowicz gave in a gaming seminar organized by Pareto Securities
Link to it
In that conference, thought for investors, apart from all the things that we talked about
in Sunday's video, they showed this slide referring to the long-term plans of the company
that only included the franchises Witcher and Cyberpunk,
as Adam Kiciński himself stressed during the conference
As you can see in this slide, their plans include AAA games based on their own IPs Witcher
and Cyberpunk, which, by the way, even if I didn't do a huge video of it, yes, they
are clearly saying that there's going to be a fourth game based on the Witcher universe
but go figure when it's going to be released, and below we have minigames, one is Gwent
that we already know and the other, let's see if you can guess what other IP does CD Projekt own
Although in my personal theory, because dreaming is free, we will see this minigame introduced
on June at E3 but, again, theory, no proof about this whatsoever, it seems that the fact
that they are working in a Cyberpunk 2077 mini-game is closer to fact than to theory
but go figure when are they going to release this mini-game, we may be contemplating the
same time window that they used for the Witcher where the spin-off was released after the
main game was on the market
And as I said before, the reason why I believe that this minigame is going to be introduced
on E3 is because CDPR said lots of times that they loved the way Bethesda managed the release
of Fallout 4 and what Bethesda did was introducing the minigame Fallout Shelter both as a "game
as a service" and they did a lot of money with it, and also for advertising purposes
so people that didn't know anything about the universe would learn a little more about it
And it's great, because lately I'm seeing a lot of interest in the game from people
that know nothing about the original pen and paper game, and I'm glad the interest is
expanding, and also I envy them a little because they will be able to discover the Cyberpunk
universe and see it for the first time, and this is something that I can't do anymore
but these people that know nothing about the game
will enjoy it more with a little knowledge on the lore, so this minigame would be a great way to start
This mini-game that is a personal theory of mine, ok? Remember: theory, no facts to support it whatsoever
And it would be great that they started doing something soon, because we're almost two
months away from the beep, I honestly expected them to say something at this point, not sure
if they're testing our hype
Is there a hyp-o-meter?
Well, folks, thanks for watching, don't forget to take a look at our Cyberpunk 2077
lore playlist to know more about the dark future
See you in next videos and stay being amazing
-------------------------------------------
She Said ... Maybe? - Duration: 3:06.K so I'm back out here again.
And Uh at the Ox Bow Bluff
Again because yesterday kind of went completely different than the way I expected it.
The Ox Bo uh Albuquerque going to overlook the Rio Rande.
So I have a couple things that I want to get done.
I brought her.
We meaning my sister and I and her boyfriend and
Literally, as we get here I get a text message from her boyfriend saying.
I might be proposing tonight
UH...
Wait, What?
OK Rewind Like the whole time, I'm like paranoid that
I'm not going to get the shot that you know he's going to be on his knee and I'm going
to miss it.
I was totally... aah
I was trying to get shots of different things, but I didn't.
So I came back a second day and that's what I'm doing to today.
Finally got the drone up and running.
All this to say originally going to be a vlog, so I turned it into a little Instagram story
for them.
Here's that story.
[Soft Acoustic Music Bed]
It was a very interesting day.
Went nothing the way I thought it was going to do.
I was going to do some like a love story, and two couples hiking together in the oxbow
and it ended up being something completely different.
It was definitely fun.
This is always one of my favorite placed to shoot.
Uh In...
It just oversees the city.
It almost feels kind of nature-y and overlooks Albuquerque.
Thanks for joining me.
Thanks for coming on this weird crazy adventure uh.
With my sister and now future brother in law. Um If you liked this video
hit the like button.
If you want to see more of these videos hit subscribe button.
As I go around New Mexico, Albuquerque, and other places so um but yeah.
I have a huge list of places I want to go places I want to go, places I want to see,
things I want to do.
If you want to see those go-ahead hit that subscribe button.
I'll see you guys next time.
[Alternitive Rock Music Bed]
-------------------------------------------
MICHELIN STAR MAIS BARATO DO MUNDO - TIM HO WAN - Duration: 21:50. For more infomation >> MICHELIN STAR MAIS BARATO DO MUNDO - TIM HO WAN - Duration: 21:50.-------------------------------------------
Big Brother Sims #3 - A Primeira Eliminação! - Duration: 3:18. For more infomation >> Big Brother Sims #3 - A Primeira Eliminação! - Duration: 3:18.-------------------------------------------
CBC NL Here & Now Thursday March 8 2018 - Duration: 1:03:00. For more infomation >> CBC NL Here & Now Thursday March 8 2018 - Duration: 1:03:00.-------------------------------------------
Fortnite WEIRDEST GLITCH EVER 1000 IQ JUMP TRICK Funny and Best Moments Ep.11 Battle Royale keywords - Duration: 10:45.like plz
-------------------------------------------
Sekai of koratto - Avance - - Duration: 0:30.Advance - Sekai of koratto-
all right
eh... all right
it's for my own good
I get it
take care
please come back
-------------------------------------------
Why Frogs Sometimes Fall From the Sky - Duration: 6:22.SciShow is supported by Brilliant.org.
[ ♪ Intro ]
You've probably heard the phrase "it's raining cats and dogs outside."
And you probably also know better than to take that literally.
But sometimes, animals do fall from the sky.
There have been rare but regular reports of this phenomenon going all the way back to ancient Rome.
Sure, some of the historical accounts are probably exaggerated, but there are enough
well-documented cases in this century that we know that animal rain is definitely a thing.
And meteorologists think they know why.
Well, mostly.
If you read Pliny the Elder's stories of frogs and fish falling from the heavens, you
might be understandably skeptical.
But in 2005, thousands of frogs rained down on a small town in Serbia.
Then, in 2009, clouds of tadpoles fell in Japan.
And in 2010, small fish that were very much still alive pelted a town in Australia's
Northern Territory for several days.
That was the third time that town had experienced animal downpours since 1970.
And similar fishy weather events have been reported from Wales, India, the Philippines,
Honduras, Sri Lanka, Ethiopia, and Mexico in just the last twenty years.
Other places have described storms of birds.
Also spiders.
No!
The question is, where are all these animals coming from?
And how are they getting up in the air?
In some cases, there's a perfectly ordinary explanation that freaked-out observers just
aren't aware of.
When spider rain fell in Australia three years ago, for example, of course it was Australia,
it was probably just a case of ballooning, where spider babies use their silk to float
long distances on air currents.
It's perfectly natural, if slightly terrifying when the entire landscape is suddenly coated
in a thick layer of cobwebs.
And the thousands of blackbirds that fell out of the sky in Arkansas and Louisiana in
early 2011 probably died from crashing into things when they were startled by the fireworks
on New Year's Eve.
It's those other animal rain incidents—the aquatic ones—that are much harder to explain.
In the past, people thought maybe migrating birds were dropping their prey en masse.
No one had any idea why they might do this, mind you.
But why else would frogs fall from the sky?
There's no such thing as a frog with wings.
These days, most scientists and meteorologists think these animals come from waterspouts:
tornadoes over open water, like oceans or large lakes.
They're most common in tropical oceans, but they've been seen all over the world,
and they can form over water even when conditions are relatively calm.
All it takes is enough warmth and humidity for clouds to condense and touch down.
The waterspouts that form in fair weather tend to be small, weak, and short-lived.
But sometimes, waterspouts form when land tornadoes move out to sea.
These are less common, but they're also much larger and more dangerous.
Regular tornadoes have been known to carry lightweight debris like paper as far as 320
kilometers, and heavier objects like metal signs for 80 kilometers.
I mean, Dorothy made it all the way to Oz.
So while waterspouts aren't usually as strong, the idea that they might suck up things, transport
them some distance, and then drop them in a new location does make sense.
And if they do, those things could include small fish or frogs.
Several of the living hail events in recent years coincided with storms and strong winds,
which also fits the waterspouts theory.
The fact that the animals are aquatic also makes sense.
And occasional reports of animal rain in places far from water could be explained by land-based
tornadoes or other strong updrafts instead.
The thing is, no one has actually ever seen this happen.
It isn't exactly easy to observe a violent storm over water, so it could just be that
meteorologists who study waterspouts aren't on high alert for airborne fish.
Or, since these "amphibious rain" events are so rare, maybe they haven't been in
the right place at the right time.
So even though the waterspouts idea fits really well, we haven't been able to confirm it.
Maybe if we did, we could also explain another mysterious detail: why they usually involve
just one animal or even one species.
It's frogs, or fish, not a random mix of nearby aquatic life.
Some scientists think that that's because objects of similar size and weight fall out
together as storm forces die down.
Others find that answer less than satisfying, since lakes and oceans contain lots of different
animals that are fairly similarly-sized.
Another possibility is that the spouts only pick things up when they're densely clustered.
But until we actually see animals getting pulled out of the water by spouts, no one
can really say what limits the storm's catch.
So, if fish or frogs start falling from the sky and plopping onto the sidewalk, don't
panic — it's probably not a sign of the end of times.
It's just a really weird weather phenomenon with a perfectly reasonable scientific explanation.
Probably.
But even if it's not raining frogs, the science of weather is fascinating.
Which is why I wanted to test my understanding of atmospheric pressure systems with this Brilliant quiz.
If you want to join me, Brilliant set up a link so you can test your knowledge too.
Click on the link in the description or go to brilliant.org/SciShowAtmospheric in a new tab.
I'm taking a quiz.
So I first got excited about meteorology when I was in college because there was a cute
girl who was really into meteorology.
This is how my… my interest in…
It wasn't the weather that did it.
So I'm taking my quiz here.
Is moist air more likely to exert a higher or lower pressure than dry air of the same temperature?
Oh.
Hmm…
I would say higher would be my guess, but now I'm guessing.
I was wrong.
Moist air is lighter than dry air.
Huh.
I guess because water is lighter than nitrogen.
That makes sense.
Once it's… it doesn't seem like that would be the case.
I hadn't thought about that, which is why, like, clouds rise up.
Duh.
Get your act together, Hank.
One of my favorite twitter accounts is the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration satellite's twitter.
Very good satellite data coming out these days.
And I love it but I feel a little bit like I don't actually know what's happening
even though this is my job.
And I'm I'm going through this and realising that I indeed need to hone my skills to be
a person who better understands what's actually going on.
And you can do that too at Brilliant.org . The First 77 viewers to sign up at Brilliant.org/Scishow
will get 20% off their annual premium subscription and you will support SciShow.
So thanks!
[ ♪ Outro ]
-------------------------------------------
Senate Republicans Just Defeated Dems, Restore God-Given Constitutional Right - Duration: 5:20.Senate Republicans Just Defeated Dems, Restore God-Given Constitutional Right.
The United States Constitution is a document that we're probably all familiar with.
It's the one that recognizes that no country or human institution gives rights; God gives
them, and it's up to the government to accept them.
When they said that we are "…endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights…"
they just acknowledged that this government would be one that yields to God-given rights.
They wanted to work with God, not against him.
A lot has changed since 1776, and not many of our politicians still have those beliefs.
Our elected officials almost exclusively lean on their understanding and listen to whatever
the majority wants.
That failing on the part of our government remember their mission, to keep the people
safe, is what lead to the one thing that has killed more Americans than anything else;
abortion.
Since the 1970's, Americans have been systematically killing off the next generation, all for the
sake of convenience.
Government rationalized it, claiming that the unborn aren't alive at all.
The battle for the lives of the unborn has been raging for decades, but the state of
Iowa has just taken an enormous leap to saving lives.
In honor of Women's Day, we tell you about all the women who won't be slaughtered on
the altar of convenience.
We can tell you that the Iowa Senate has decided that once a heartbeat can be detected, the
baby can no longer be killed.
The American Conservative Herald reports that this comes after a long hard debate about
the interpretation of life, and how we define it:
"Quite simply, the debate over constitutional and God-given rights is never going to end.
The most vocal folks on both sides of the argument have their feet completely dug into
the ground, and that's not a recipe for a meaningful debate over the facts.
However, there remains plenty of room for debate when it comes to what's legal and
what's not.
For conservatives, we firmly believe that the words stated in both our Declaration of
Independence and U.S. Constitution mean exactly what they mean and that their words stand
the test of time.
If a new proposed law defies either one of these documents, then it's time to throw
it out.
And then you have Liberals, who believe that these two precious documents are always open
to new interpretation.
So in their minds, anything goes and any bill that would naturally destroy either the Declaration
or Constitution is no big deal.
To them, changing laws to go with the current times is necessary.
Thankfully, one Midwest state was able to put a kibosh on Democrats who were trying
to deny our most basic right by a vote of 30-20.
Conservative Tribune has the details.
The Iowa Senate voted Wednesday to pass a bill banning abortions if an unborn child's
heartbeat is detected upon ultrasound, moving Iowa one step closer to becoming the first
state to ban abortions.
Iowa lawmakers voted 30 to 20 Wednesday for Senate Bill 3143, which outlaws abortion upon
the presence of a fetal heartbeat.
A heartbeat typically becomes detectable between six and nine weeks gestation.
The pending legislation entails any doctor being charged with a Class D felony — subject
to five years in prison and a $750-to-$7,500 fine — if they perform or attempt an abortion
on a woman after an unborn child's heartbeat is detected.
Needless to say, critics have blasted the bill and will do whatever they can to continue
to fight their heinous fight.
There were Senate members who voted against the bill, of course.
'This bill is dangerous.
This bill is unconstitutional.
This bill devalues Iowa women,' Democratic Senate Minority Leader Janet Petersen said,
according to The Courier.
The bill is 'unpopular, unconstitutional, and unconscionable,' Parenthood of the Heartland
public affairs Director Erin Davison-Rippey said.
'Seven in 10 Americans agree that abortion should remain safe and legal,' Davison-Rippey
added.
However, public sentiment indicates that changes are needed, and the bill amounts to a huge
step in the right direction.
Seventy-six percent of Americans, however, want significant abortion restrictions, including
making abortion illegal after three months into pregnancy.
Ninety-two percent of Republicans, 61 percent of Democrats and 78 percent of Independents
want significant abortion restrictions."
The career politicians in Washington like to pretend that they have a whole lot of jobs,
but American was founded on the principle that the people needed to be free, and the
government needed to be small.
The truth of the matter is that they've only got a few things on their to-do list,
and protecting the innocent is right there at the top.
Whether they want to believe it or not, Iowa's policy change is a win for all.
Taking away the option of murder is something that saves both the murderer and the would-be
victim.
One last thought on abortion from one of the greatest Presidents in American history, the
late great Ronald Reagan: "I've noticed that everyone who is for
abortion has already been born."
– Ronald Reagan
What do you think about this?
Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe
Top Stories Today
-------------------------------------------
ICE Lawyer Steals Identities Of Immigrants - Duration: 1:19.Finally tonight, some good news.
An attorney from Immigrations & Customs Enforcement pleaded guilty to stealing immigrant identities
that he used to evade taxes and take out fraudulent loans with.
Attorney Rafael Sanchez was ICE's top attorney for Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Alaska.
Government documents allege he used the ICE database to find immigrant identities to forge
utility bills and Washington State driver's licenses.
He then used those identifications to open credit cards, pay shell companies in cash,
and take out loans, which the federal government says amounted to at least $190,000.
He also claimed these stolen identities as dependents on his taxes.
Sanchez was consequently charged with wire fraud and aggravated identity theft and he's
gonna be sentenced in May.
Presumably, this lawyer believed he could get away with tax evasion and bank fraud because
he was stealing the identities of immigrants.
He had power and he used it to take advantage of one of the most vulnerable inhabitants
in America.
People like this don't deserve to hold top positions within our justice system and hopefully,
this judge is gonna give him plenty of time to think about that behind bars and to think
about maybe how he needs a totally new career.
-------------------------------------------
First Contact How Could We Possibly Talk With Aliens - Duration: 17:44.First Contact How Could We Possibly Talk With Aliens
BY Brent Swancer
Ever since we as a species have become aware of other stars and planets beyond our own
we have let our imaginations run wild with what might lie out there or if we really are
alone in the universe upon this spinning rock we call Earth.
Are there other creatures or beings inhabiting other stars, and if so we will we ever see
them or even talk to them?
These are the dreams of our kind, the questions that still loom large across the landscape
of our psyche.
Is there someone else out there?
Further adding to our questions is if there was some other race out there, and we did
actually manage to make contact with them across the sea of stars, what would they be
like?
Would we be able to talk to these alien visitors and perhaps more importantly, what would we
say?
The conundrum of how we would communicate with extraterrestrials has in recent years
been seriously considered, and despite all of the very smart people working on it we
are mostly still left in the dark and unprepared for what talking to an alien might actually
be like.
If aliens were to come down and greet us, say, tomorrow, we would likely immediately
be faced with numerous challenges even beyond language, such as culture, customs, ways of
thinking, and even possibly a different concept and perception of reality itself.
We might not even recognize them as any type of life as we know it.
But if we were to assume that we could just start talking, there would be several potential
obstacles right off the bat, not the least of which is that our bodies would likely be
completely different, and this could have a lot of possible repercussions.
For one, since language is a representation of our thoughts, which are largely based in
how we perceive and interact with the world, human languages reflect the concepts of our
senses of sight, smell, touch, and other cues from our physical form, our shared evolution
and physical actions and reactions such as laughter or crying.
What then happens if an alien race has no eyes or ears or mouth, or experiences the
world in a totally different way?
What if they do not have the same physical relationship with their as we do with our
own?
What if they don�t laugh or cry, or emote as we do?
They may have no understanding at all of what our concepts of perception are in the first
place, a totally different way of experiencing and thinking about time and reality, and so
this would reverberate throughout their whole way of thinking and communication, and indeed
their very being.
This was all rather well-explored in the film Arrival, in which a team of linguists is tasked
with deciphering the mysterious language of a decidedly non-humanoid species with a very
different language and view of time and space, and within the understanding of which hangs
the balance of our survival.
Even within human languages here on Earth we can see how the effects of our sensory
abilities, our upbringing, and our perceptions of the world around us can change methods
and means of communication.
For instance, deaf people use sign language as a means to communicate when the sense of
hearing is robbed from them.
However, although human languages do all sound very unique and even alien at times, and there
are sign languages and whatnot, they are still based on our shared perception of the universe
through the same common biology, morphology, anatomy, and physiology, and therefore they
follow rules that we can all fathom and which give us at least a chance of reproducing them.
With aliens, all bets would be off.
Another important hurdle with differences in physical form would be how we produce and
detect sounds, and thereby language, in the first place.
For humans we use a vocal tract and our ears, and there is a very finite, set frequency
through which we are able to detect the sounds we utter.
With aliens they would be working with a whole different set of organs, frequencies, and
physiology for speech, that is if they even �spoke� as we know it at all.
Their utterances would possibly be made through strange organs for which we have no close
approximation or even understanding of, would probably be made at frequencies, vibrations,
or cadences that we would not be able to detect or recognize as language, and would be made
through a different atmosphere to make it all even worse.
These would be completely non-human sounds, we may not be able to physically discern the
distinctions they make, and considering that many animals on our very own planet are thought
to be able to speak in language and we are completely in the dark as to what they are
saying, this would likely be even more pronounced in something from out beyond the stars.
Perhaps impossibly, indecipherably so.
Simply put, if we cannot physically detect their sounds and cannot reproduce them, then
vocal communication is virtually impossible.
Let�s say, for argument�s sake, that we can get past these obstacles, and that we
can hear and be heard by each other in a meaningful way.
The problems would still not end there.
The very rules of our language and the way they are laid out are all intrinsically linked
to our biology and mindset as well.
An alien language might not have any of the parts of language that we take for granted,
such as verbs, adjectives, and nouns, would possibly not view things such as cause and
effect or the passage of time the same as us, and would potentially follow certain internal
rules, logic, and structures so different from us that we are unable to even mutually
comprehend them.
We as humans have shared cognition and linguistic structures, basic psychologies, and features,
but aliens cannot be counted upon to do so.
Jessica Coon, a professor of linguistics at McGill University in Montreal who was consulted
on the film about extraterrestrial communication, Arrival, said of this:
What linguists have discovered about human languages is that even though they can sound
very different from one another and their grammars do show a lot of variation�languages
tend to fall into certain patterns.
Most of the world�s languages fall into one of those patterns or the other.
The variation isn�t completely unconstrained.
Humans seem to be hardwired for this capacity to learn language.
Because it is part of our genetics and part of being human, it�s very unlikely that
other creatures would have the same kinds of constraints or show the same kinds of similarities
that human languages do.
We would just have to hope that we would still be able to recognize patterns and match it
up with we�re seeing.
The notable American linguist and cognitive scientist Noam Chomsky has also offered his
thoughts on the inherit linguistic problems with trying to talk with extraterrestrial
beings with which we have no shared cognitive understanding of how language works.
He has said:
If a Martian landed from outer space and spoke a language that violated universal grammar,
we simply would not be able to learn that language the way that we learn a human language
like English or Swahili.
We�re designed by nature for English, Chinese, and every other possible human language.
But we�re not designed to learn perfectly usable languages that violate universal grammar.
The formidable challenge this would present can already be seen even among human languages
here on our own planet, where there are sometimes things we have no word for, or a lack of a
word for something we take for granted.
A tropical people might have no word for �snow,� for instance.
Some remote, isolated languages are so alien to others that they do not even have words,
concepts or phrases for things most speakers of other languages would likely take for granted.
For instance, the Pirah� people of the Brazilian Amazon have no words for counting things.
It is either �one� or �more than one,� that�s it.
They also have no clear words for certain directions such as �left� or �right,�
and this is a daunting challenge to understanding them, even though they are human.
Imagine a completely non-human entity with even more outlandish rules of language and
grammatical idiosyncrasies and you can see how meaningful exchanges could be a problem.
Jesse Snedeker, a Harvard psychologist who studies the development of language in children,
has said of this:
We know that every child can learn every possible human language.
Every child has to have some sort of internal capacity that allows them to learn language.
We have to ask ourselves, �Would we have the capacity to learn alien language, and
would they have the capacity to learn ours?� And different people would give you very different
answers to that question.
On the other hand, there�s the argument that any species that achieves a high level
of technology would necessarily understand certain concepts, so that ought to provide
a basis for at least a limited degree of communication.
This is where we begin to see that all hope is not necessarily lost, and one thing seen
as the key to actually being able to start towards communication with aliens is to find
some commonality to use as a starting point.
A good way to do this would be to have some sort of key, something like the Rosetta Stone,
which helped us to decipher ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics.
This has been an idea tossed around in science fiction before, such as the use of the tones
in Spielberg�s Close Encounters of the Third Kind, or the use of prime numbers in Carl
Sagan�s book Contact.
If we could have some common frame of reference and somewhere to start, then there is the
chance we could work towards further meaningful communication.
One of the best ways of doing this has been seen in recent years as being to use mathematics
or scientific information such as physics as a sort of �universal language� and
starting point.
After all, as the laws of physics and reality are the same throughout the universe, then
it stands to reason that any advanced society would have a grasp of these things in a similar
way, regardless of how we ultimately think about them or express them in language.
No matter what our physiological differences or deviations in ways of looking at the world
and universe, physics are the same everywhere, and so would be a commonality we could use.
Carl DeVito, an emeritus faculty member in the mathematics department at the University
of Arizona in Tucson, believes that although this exchange of scientific information is
perhaps the key to communication with aliens, it nevertheless still faces some challenges.
First is that the idea that it is still reliant on understanding the aliens� systems of
measurement, as well as relying on the supposition that they can count and do arithmetic as we
do, that they recognize the same elements of the periodic table, that they have adequately
studied the different states of matter, and that they know enough chemistry to carry out
chemical calculations in the same way we do.
He also points out that even though the physics would be the same, these extraterrestrials
might calculate their rules of motion and mechanics based on their own unique geometry.
DeVito has said of this:
The mathematics of motion is differential calculus.
Can we assume that an alien race shares this with us?
Differential and integral calculus are so fundamental in so many areas of science that
it is hard to imagine a science without them.
But this is, perhaps, a human bias.
We, of course, can�t know, but we must be aware that the physics of an alien race, even
in a fundamental area like mechanics, might differ in subtle but important ways from our
own.
Using mathematics and physics is nevertheless still seen as a potential way of breaking
through our communication barrier, to the point that it is used by those organizations
seeking to reach out and make contact, such as SETI.
However, even if we can express simple messages to each other with math, there are still the
intricacies of culture and thinking that would shape how messages and ideas are expressed
and interpreted.
Doug Vakoch, the president of Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence, METI, and respected researcher
of xenolinguistics, has said of this conundrum thus:
If they can build spacecraft to come to come to Earth, they have to have an understanding
of good engineering, physics, science, math.
But doing the nitty-gritty work of going back and forth and making guesses at what an alien
says, trying to interpret swirls and determining a sentence or concept?
It�s hard.
Conveying matters.
You need flexibility of language with its infinite combinations.
Our art and culture � that�s all from language, that�s not from just raw numbers.
In addition to the promise of using math, there is also the hopeful fact that it is
possible that the alien�s psyches and physicality are not as different from our own as we may
think after all.
For instance, on our own planet we can see vastly different organisms that have nevertheless
developed strikingly similar ways of dealing with the environment and world around them,
such as evolving eyes, ears, legs, wings and similar organs separately across species,
often evolving independently or sometimes the same structures multiple times, all in
the process called �convergent evolution.�
Perhaps in other areas of the universe extraterrestrials have evolved similarly enough to ourselves,
especially an intelligent tool-using one that would have developed communication and technology
in the first place, that our mental architectures and languages are not necessarily mutually
unintelligible.
This theory postulates that there are enough universal elements to how we think and evolve
to certain environmental challenges that this would be enough solid ground for us to delve
into a basic framework from which further communication would be possible.
Making this even more promising still is that with all of the broadcasts we have spewed
out into the stars the aliens would potentially have a good enough sampling of our languages
and communications to make talking between us easier without having even met us yet,
a possibility of which Coon has said:
If you have enough information and enough of the context and the history, I think there�s
hope that even without a lot of interaction you could be able to make at least significant
progress in understanding the grammar of a language�again depending on how likely we
are to be able to understand alien life at all.
I wouldn�t be surprised at all if creatures who could make giant spaceships that just
show up on Earth could easily figure out our languages from the many broadcasts we put
into outer space, and that we might be able to do the same thing with sufficient resources
and sufficient information.
One thing that is worth considering is that even if we overcome all of these considerable
challenges and are able to communicate, look at us here on Earth.
With our different cultures, ways of thinking, values, and linguistic nuances, even communication
between us humans can be confusing and difficult, with misunderstandings and gaffes commonplace.
How can we hope to resolve these issues with an alien civilization from another star?
In the end, we just don�t know.
Since we have never made contact with aliens, at least as far as we know, there is no precedent
for it, and we cannot possibly know what to expect when such a day comes to pass.
It is impossible to know what form these beings will take, how they will think, or how they
will communicate.
Will it come easy or will we forever remain closed behind mutual doors of incomprehensibility?
The answers remain complex, it is all left entirely to speculation and the imagination,
and we will only know when we finally make that first contact we have always dreamed
of.
-------------------------------------------
New Spec Idea for Paladins! [Rated W for Warcraft #5] - Duration: 5:15. For more infomation >> New Spec Idea for Paladins! [Rated W for Warcraft #5] - Duration: 5:15.-------------------------------------------
Murphy's Law | 'Caught' parody | 22 Minutes - Duration: 2:11.The Streets of Toronto are no place for suckers.
- Hurry up man, before the Fuzz comes.
We need to Boogie.
And that means you need the most far out cops.
- Not so expeditiously my nefarious friend!
- Aw no...
It's Rex Murphy and David Suzuki.
It's Murphy's Law:
starring Rex Murphy and David Suzuki.
- Suzuki!
I believe the time has come for us to engage in fisticuffs.
- Well Rex, the equation is simple.
Skill plus force,
and effective mass,
equals one cold cock-chunky.
*high-fives*
- And now for a preliminary examination of
the contraband.
- Okay.
- Drugs.
Drugs may be the road to ruin, but it's a road that takes the scenic route.
Drugs have destroyed many lives, but wrong-headed government decisions have
destroyed many more.
Drugs destroy hope and ambition.
And in doing so they set fire to the only ladder which the addicted can use to climb
up, out of the hole that they have dug for themselves
with their own hands.
What is it?
Blow?
Coke?
Snow?
Powder?
Well Rex, before I tell you -
Let's take a look at where cocaine comes from.
Modern cocaine is derived from the Coca plant.
One of the most potent and natural stimulants on the planet, and for thousands of years,
Inca and other South American tribes have used the Coca plant for religious and recreational
purposes.
And in 1859, German chemists - - Shut up!
Shut up okay!
Please.
- I give up, I'll do anything you want.
Just, stop talking.
- Ah-ha-ha-ha! *high-five*
Murphy's Law will not be seen next week.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét