Thứ Sáu, 25 tháng 5, 2018

Waching daily May 26 2018

Do you guys know how to get the Thanos gun?

NO YELLING ON THE BUS!

Teach me.

The prophecy is true.

Hey man, look what I found!

GET THAT OUT OF HERE

WE'RE LIKE 7 OR SOMETHING!

Man I'm sorry man.

(Dab)

For more infomation >> Something About Fortnite - Duration: 1:51.

-------------------------------------------

Harvey Weinstein Surrenders To Authorities - Duration: 12:48.

HARVEY WEINSTEIN MADE

HIS PERP WALK INTO THE COURTHOUSE TO POST A

MILLION-DOLLAR BAIL WHICH HE ESSENTIALLY JUST DROPPED ON THE

TABLE AND WALKED OUT.

HARVEY WEINSTEIN IS A CONSEQUENCE OF

THIS MORNING ACTIVITIES WILL BE FITTED WITH A GPS DEVICE BECAUSE

HE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH RAPE AND HE CANNOT LEAVE THE AREA OF

NEW YORK OR CONNECTICUT.

HERE IS HOW IT WAS DESCRIBED, THE VIDEO THAT WE HAVE BY

THE ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY.

THE CHARGES HERE TODAY ARE A RESULT OF MONTHS OF

INVESTIGATION AND THAT INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THIS

DEFENDANT USED HIS POSITION, MONEY, AND POWER TO THE WERE

YOUNG WOMEN INTO SITUATIONS WHEN HE WAS ABLE TO VIOLATE THEM

SEXUALLY.

OUR INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING AND WE HAVE ENCOURAGED OTHER

SURVIVORS TO COME FORWARD.

THAT LITTLE REACTION THAT HE HAD WHEN HE HEARD VIOLATE

THEM SEXUALLY, IT WAS THIS WEIRD LITTLE DISMISSIVE, WHEN YOU

MAKE OF THAT MOMENT?

I THINK HE WAS JUST HAVING A FLASHBACK THE POTTED PLANTS.

THEY GOT ME.

HIS LAWYER MADE SOME STATEMENTS, WHICH WE PULLED

VIDEO OF.

HERE IS HIS LAWYER BENJAMIN BRAFFMEN.

HIS FIRST

STATEMENT WAS ABOUT HINTING AT WHETHER THE JURY WILL

BELIEVE THIS AND WHETHER THEY CAN FIND THE RIGHT KIND OF

JURY IN HIS MIND AT ALL.

TAKE A LOOK.

MANY OF THESE OBLIGATIONS ARE LONG OVERDUE QUITE FRANKLY

HAVING BEEN MADE ABOUT EVENTS THAT ARE ALLEGED TO HAVE

OCCURRED MANY YEARS AGO.

THEY WERE NOT REPORTED TO THE POLICE

AT THE TIME.

THESE EVENTS OCCURRED AND I ANTICIPATE THAT

THE WOMEN WHO HAVE MADE THESE ALLEGATIONS WHEN SUBJECTED TO

CROSS-EXAMINATION IN THE EVENTS WE EVEN GET THAT FAR, THAT

THE CHARGES WILL NOT BE BELIEVED BY 12

PEOPLE, ASSUMING WE GET 12 FAIR PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT CONSUMED

BY THE MOVEMENT THAT SEEMS TO HAVE OVERTAKEN THIS CASE.

SO THE MOVEMENT THAT SEEMS TO HAVE OVERTAKEN THIS CASE.

ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT HIM AS BEETLEJUICE,

BEETLEJUICE, BEETLEJUICE.

I HOPE HE DISAPPEARS.

WHAT IS IT WITH THE OLD-SCHOOL NEW YORK GUYS AND THE HAIR?

TRUMPS DOCTOR, WEINSTEIN'S LAWYER.

ANYWAY, SOME POTENTIAL

BAD NEWS HERE.

I READ A FAIRLY PERSUASIVE ARTICLE

ON LAW AND CRIME ABOUT HOW HE MIGHT GET AWAY.

OF

COURSE THERE IS 1 MILLION THINGS THAT CAN HAPPEN BETWEEN NOW

AND THEN BUT OUR JOB IS TO ANALYZE RIGHT?

FIRST OF ALL, LET'S ALSO NOTE A TERRIBLE THING THAT THE LAWYER

SAID.

HE SAID HARVEY WEINSTEIN DIDN'T INVENTS THE CASTING COUCH

DOTS IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION, THAT IS ABOUT A BADDEST

THING YOU CAN SAY.

WHAT'S THE BIG, EVERYBODY WAS RAPING WOMEN

WHO ARE COMING IN.

BUT IN THE ACTUAL COURT, THAT MIGHT NOT BE

AS BAD AS IT SOUNDS TO US, SO HE IS GOING TO SAY SINCE IT WAS

SUCH AN INDUSTRY-STANDARD THAT YOU WOULD HAVE TO SLEEP FOR A

JOB, IT MIGHT'VE BEEN THAT THE WOMEN ASSUMED THAT THEY WERE

PART OF THAT PROCESS HENCE IT WAS NOT ONLY AGAINST THEIR WILL,

THAT IN HOLLYWOOD, YOU MUST SLEEPER A JOB AND THEY ARE

CHOOSING TO DO THAT.

THAT IS GOING TO BE PART OF HIS CASE.

IT IS GOING TO BE HARD TO PROVE WHAT WAS IN PEOPLE'S HEADS.

A

REALLY IMPORTANT PART OF THIS CASE IS THAT BECAUSE OF THE

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, THEY COULD NOT CHARGE HARVEY

WEINSTEIN WITH LOWER CRIMES.

THEY HAD TO CHARGE THEM WITH

FIRST-DEGREE RAPE AND FIRST-DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT

BECAUSE THE LOWER CRIMES, ESPECIALLY FOR THE 2004 CASE ARE

TOO OLD BUT THE GOOD NEWS IN NEW YORK IS THAT THERE IS NO STATUTE

OF LIMITATIONS ON RAPE IN THE 1ST∞.

THE BAD NEWS IS YOU HAVE

TO PROVE THE HIGHEST CHARGE POSSIBLE SO FOR EXAMPLE IN ONE

OF THE CASES THEY SAY THE WOMAN FELL INTIMIDATED AND THREATENS,

BUT IN NEW YORK LAW, IN ORDER TO PROVE FIRST-DEGREE AND THIS IS

WHERE IT GETS TRICKY AND THAT'S WHAT THE LAWYERS WILL GO TO WORK

ON THE JURY, A THREAT OF ACTUAL FORCE, WAS FORCED

THREATENED, WAS FORCE USED?

AND THERE'S EVEN ANOTHER LOOPHOLE, AND ONE OF THESE

CHARGES IS SAYS SEX, WHICH IS INTERPRETED IN OLDER CASE LAW AS

INTERCOURSE AND NOT NECESSARILY ORAL SEX AND THE 2004 CASE WAS

ORAL SEX SO HE HAS A STREAM TEAM BECAUSE HE HAS ALL OF THE MONEY

IN THE WORLD, THIS IS ONE OF THE TOP LAWYERS THERE IS IN THIS

FIELD AND HE IS GOING TO UNLEASH THEM SO DON'T BE SURPRISED

IF AT THE END, HE IS NOT CONVICTED.

I THINK HE MAKES A POINT THOUGH, I'M NOT TRYING TO EXCUSE

HARVEY WEINSTEIN'S BEHAVIOR BUT I THINK THAT THIS IS A REAL

SYSTEMIC ISSUE AND I THINK THAT HARVEY WEINSTEIN IS ONE OF THE

SYMPTOMS OF AN ISSUE THAT WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT BILL COSBY AND

ALL OF THE MEN WHO ARE NOW GOING DOWN WHO ARE NO LONGER OF VALUE

TO HOLLYWOOD ANYMORE BUT WHILE THEY WERE IN THEIR HEYDAY IN ALL

OF THIS STUFF WAS GOING ON THEY WERE BEING ENABLED, A LOT OF

PEOPLE KEEP TALKING ABOUT HOW THEY KNEW THAT THESE GUYS WERE

DOING THIS AND NO ONE SAID ANYTHING AND I THINK THAT WE

REALLY NEED TO TALK ABOUT THE DEEPER PROBLEM WHICH IS NOT JUST

HARVEY WEINSTEIN, BUT THERE IS A COLLECTION OF PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE

THAT THIS BEHAVIOR IS ACCEPTABLE AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO WATCH

IT HAPPEN.

THIS BIG SPORTS AGENT, VERY BIG-TIME, I WAS

SITTING AT DINNER WITH MY FRIENDS HE WALKED BY ME WITHOUT

KNOWING ME AND RAN HIS HANDS THROUGH MY HAIR AND I WENT OFF

ON HIM BUT WHAT MADE ME SO ANGRY WAS THAT I WAS SITTING WITH TWO

MEN, ONE WHO WORK AT NIKE AND ONE WHO WAS A SPORTS AGENT AND

THEY LEFT IT OFF, THEY DIDN'T THINK THAT THAT WAS INVASIVE,

THEY DIDN'T THINK IT WAS DISRESPECTFUL, THEY TOLD ME TO

JUST SIMMER DOWN AND I AM LIKE A LETTER STRANGE MEN WALK

AROUND AND CARESS YOUR HAIR.

YOU WOULD GET UP AND PROBABLY TRY TO FIGHT HIM.

IF I HAD A DOLLAR FOR EVERY TIME THAT HAPPENED.

IT WAS JUST WEIRD.

I WAS LISTENING TO QUINN AND PALTROW

TALK ABOUT HOW BRAD PITT I WILL KILL YOU BUT THEN HE WENT ON TO

DO AND GLORIOUS PASTORS WITH THEM AND THAT IS THE PROBLEM IS

THAT EVEN THOUGH YOU SLEPT SOMEBODY ON THE WRIST AND SAY

THAT IS NOT OKAY BUT THEY ARE STILL IN BUSINESS, THEY ARE

STILL MAKING MONEY AND IT IS STILL NOT OKAY.

I THINK ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS HEARS POWER AND

PRIVILEGE.

HERE HE IS, AS YOU SAY HAS HIGH-POWERED ATTORNEYS,

PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO ARE ABLE TO ADVOCATE FOR HIM AND NOW HE GETS

OFF, HE IS ABLE TO POST THAT MILLION DOLLAR BILL, NOT MANY

PEOPLE CAN DO THAT.

HUMANS RIGHTS WATCH, THERE WAS SOME

RESEARCH THAT WAS DONE AND THEY EXAMINED LIKE SIX COUNTRIES IN

70 TO 80% OF PEOPLE WHO ARE ARRESTED ARE NOT ABLE TO PAY SO

THEY ARE SITTING IN JAIL AND IN CALIFORNIA ALONE, NEARLY 60% OF

PRISONERS IN THE COUNTY JAILS HAVE NOT BEEN SENTENCED BUT THEY

ARE SERVING BECAUSE THEY CAN POST BAIL SO THAT IS THE OTHER

PART OF THIS DISCUSSION AS WELL, IS THE POWER AND THE PRIVILEGE

AND WHO HE IS.

WE WERE TALKING BEFORE WE CAME ON ABOUT HOW HE

WAS IN FIRST CLASS,

MELVIN, GREAT POINT.

I THOUGHT THE SAME THING WHEN I SAW THE MILLION DOLLAR CASH ALE.

HE FINDS THAT IN BETWEEN HIS COUCH, RIGHT?

WHAT IS THE POINT OF BAILED AND?

THE POINT IS UNFORTUNATELY TO KEEP POOR PEOPLE IN JAIL AND SO

THERE ARE NOW SOME DISTRICT ATTORNEYS WHO ARE OVERTURNING

THAT LIKE LARRY KRASNER IN PHILADELPHIA, WE'RE NOT DOING

CASH SPELL ANYMORE BECAUSE RICH PEOPLE AND EVEN MIDDLE-CLASS

PEOPLE CAN PAY AND POOR PEOPLE CAN'T. IT'S NOT BASED ON THE

SEVERITY OF THE CRIME AS IT IS ON YOUR INCOME LEVEL SO CASH

BAIL IS JUST A WAY TO PUT FOUR PEOPLE IN PRISON DOTS WE DON'T

EVEN KNOW THAT THEY DID A LOT OF TIMES IT IS MINOR INFRACTIONS

OR MARIJUANA CHARGES.

MEANWHILE A GUY WHO APPEARS TO BE AS

SERIAL RAPIST, ALLEGEDLY, WHAT'S RUN FREE AS HE COULD BE BECAUSE

IT'S $1 MILLION THAT HE HAS EASILY.

BUT THAT THEN LED ME TO

THINKING LOOK, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN HERE IN

THIS CASE AND IT IS GOING TO BE TOUGH BECAUSE IT IS A LITTLE BIT

OLDER AND HE HAS GREAT ATTORNEYS AND ONE OF THE KEY PARTS OF THE

CASES, WHETHER THE JUDGE WILL ALLOW THE OTHER INSTANCES OF

WHEN WOMEN CAME FORWARD AND TALKED ABOUT WHAT HARVEY

WEINSTEIN DID AND SO FROM TIME TO TIME I TELL YOU GUYS THAT I

USED TO BE A REPUBLICAN AND THE ONLY PART THAT IS LEFT THAT IS

STILL CONSERVATIVE IS THE LEGAL PART, SO IT DRIVES ME CRAZY WHEN

YOU CANNOT INTRODUCE EVIDENCE OF THEIR PATTERN IN COURT.

IT

PREVENTS JUSTICE.

IT IS NOT THAT YOU CAN'T EVER DO IT,

BUT IT IS TOUGH STANDARDS FOR WHEN YOU CAN DO AND I KNOW WHY.

YOU DON'T WANT PEOPLE JUDGING THEM BASED ON OTHER STUFF,

YOU WANT THEM JUDGING IT ON THIS CRIME BUT IF THAT GUY HAS A

PATTERN OF DOING IT 50

TIMES, IS THAT RELEVANT TO WHETHER HE DID IN THIS CASE?

OF COURSE IT'S RELEVANT.

IF THEY NEVER HEAR THAT, HERE IS A

WAY BETTER CHANCE OF GETTING OFF.

IF THEY DO HERE HE MIGHT BE

IN TROUBLE THE MATTER HOW GOOD HIS LAWYERS ARE.

I WOULD

SAY HIS LAWYER IS GOING EVEN FURTHER THAN THAT, HE IS SETTING

UP THE ARGUMENT THAT EVEN IF THEY DON'T ADMIT THAT KIND OF

EVIDENCE, AS THAT VIDEO WE SAID PROVES, HE IS SETTING UP, THERE

IS NO ONE IN AMERICA WHO HAS BEEN INSULATED FROM THE BIAS, IS

WHAT HE IS GOING TO ARGUE, THE BIAS TOWARD MY CLIENTS OF THESE

RIDICULOUS, SPURIOUS CHARGES THAT DO NOT MEAN ANYTHING AND HE

IS GOING, HE IS MOVING TO DISMISS IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO

HIM, BUT HE IS SETTING UP THAT WE CANNOT EVEN 512 PEOPLE WHO

ARE GOING TO COME IN WITH FRESH EARS, EVEN IF WE DON'T LET THAT

EVIDENCE IN.

IT IS SUPER FRUSTRATING AND HE IS ALSO KINDA SETTING IT UP

AS TO HOW UNFAIR IT IS TO HIS CLIENT.

WASN'T IT BLOOMBERG WHO SAID HE WOULDN'T SPEAK ILL OF HARVEY

BECAUSE HE IS A NEW YORKER.

THAT'S THE THING?

I HAVE TO SUPPORT EVERYONE IN LOS ANGELES?

ALL THEY DO IS SPEAK ILL OF NEW YORKERS.

HAVE YOU EVER LIVED IN NEW YORK?

BUT TO SAY THAT HE IS NOT GOING TO GET TREATED FAIRLY IN

NEW YORK, THAT IS THE OPINION OF A VERY SUCCESSFUL, RICH, WHITE

MAN IN NEW YORK IT WAS LIKE, I CAN'T THROW HARVEY UNDER THE BUS

FOR THE RAPE THAT HE DID DO BECAUSE HE IS A NEW YORKER.

IN THE WHOLE IDEA THAT THE JURY CANNOT JUDGE THE CASE

FAIRLY IF THEY HAVE EVER HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT IT, I ALSO

DON'T BELIEVE THAT AT ALL.

THEY ARE GOING TO SPEND MONTHS IN THERE AND THEY ARE GOING

TO HEAR ALL OF THE EVIDENCE SO IF WE DON'T THINK THAT THEY

COULD BE UNBIASED, THEN LET'S NOT HAVE JURY TRIALS.

AND IS IT UNFAIR, THIS IS ALL UNFAIR TO HARVEY.

YOU HAVE DONE

THIS AND DOZENS OF WOMEN HAVE ACCUSED YOU OF THIS.

YOU HAVE

GOTTEN OFF SCOT-FREE FOR YEARS WITH OSCARS IN YOUR POCKET IN A

CITY WHERE EVERYBODY KNEW, BRAD PITT KNEW YOU WERE DOING THIS.

I THINK WE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN FAIR TO YOU FOR THE LAST 20

YEARS.

YOU HAVE WHAT IS IT LIKE 80 WOMEN HAVE COME FORWARD AND

THOSE ARE JUST THE ONES WHO HAVE COME FORWARD.

IMAGINE THE COURAGE AND THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT COME

FORWARD OR DISCLOSED.

THAT IS THE OTHER THING AND STILL THIS DOESN'T SEEM TO

BE ENOUGH, AND STILL THIS MAN IS ABLE TO WALK THE STREETS

BECAUSE HE HAS ACCESS.

HE IS SMILING IN THIS PICTURE.

LAST THING ON IT IS, IF THEY GET THEM, THEY GOT THEM, GREAT.

WONDERFUL.

IF THEY DON'T GET HIM, THEIR FEDERAL PROSECUTORS

IN MANHATTAN WHO ARE ALSO LOOKING INTO THIS AND I WOULD

SAY KEEP GOING, BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND ONES IN LA, THEY

SHOULD LOOK INTO IT TO BECAUSE YOU JUST KEEP TRYING HIM AND

TELL AT LEAST YOU BANKRUPT THEM.

BY THE WAY, DON'T GET ME WRONG,

DOUBLE JEOPARDY IN THIS COUNTRY AND RIGHTFULLY SO, IT IS IN THE

U.S. CONSTITUTION, YOU CAN'T KEEP TRYING HIM IN THE SAME

VENUE FOR THE SAME CRIME, I AM NOT SUGGESTING THAT.

THERE ARE 80 CASES HERE, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO RUN OUT OF

VICTIMS UNFORTUNATELY.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét