Shiya Kofil Dair Rakhte Dey Na Ki Korbo
-------------------------------------------
WATER - 5 Common English Idioms | Learn English With Anna English - Duration: 3:31.Hi guys welcome to another English lesson with me Anna English here on
English Like a Native. As you can see I'm not in the normal setting, in fact I'm
here in Marsa Alam, Egypt and as I'm by the Red Sea I thought I would give you
five water-based idioms / phrases that we use in the UK.
Number one - a fish out of water.
If you're a fish out of water it basically means you're in a situation
where you do not feel comfortable. Imagine a fish jumping out of the water
the fish would not survive for very long because it's not equipped to be out of
the water so if you are a fish out of water then you are not comfortable or
confident in your environment.
Number two - water off a duck's back.
Water off a duck's back basically means that it doesn't bother you. Imagine if you
pour water onto a lady wearing her best outfit she would be very upset but if
you pour water onto a duck the duck would not mind at all.
It would ruffle its feathers and shake off the water but it would be perfectly
happy so if something doesn't bother you then you can say it is the water off a
duck's back it does not bother me.
Number three - smells fishy.
If something smells fishy we're not talking about the actual aroma we mean that something
doesn't seem right, so if someone's behaving in an unusual way you could say
"mmm something smells fishy, there's something fishy going on with
him" it means it's just not quite right.
Number four - to have a sinking feeling.
If you have a sinking feeling then it means that you are becoming more and more
aware that something bad has happened or that something bad is about to happen
it's having a feeling or a sense of doom on its way. You've got a sinking feeling
just like if you're in the ocean you're going down down down into the murky
depths of the ocean, to have a sinking feeling.
And number five is water under the bridge.
If something is water under Bridge then it means it has been forgotten
about, it's no longer something that bothers you or has any impact on your
daily life or how you feel. So if you and I have a fallout and at the time I'm
very upset about it but five years down the line I'm no longer concerned about
that argument and I'm not angry anymore or upset anymore, then I can say "oh that
argument, it's water under the bridge let's just be friends" so there you go
five water based phrases we have: fish out of water, water off a duck's back,
something smells fishy, to have a sinking feeling, and water under the bridge.
Guys if you know any other water-based phrases then please do put them in the
comments box below remember to give this video a LIKE, don't forget to SUBSCRIBE
take care and ... sounds like my boat's getting started. See you later! Bye!
-------------------------------------------
infos - Duration: 4:05. For more infomation >> infos - Duration: 4:05.-------------------------------------------
GINOLA - POR LAS - Duration: 2:10. For more infomation >> GINOLA - POR LAS - Duration: 2:10.-------------------------------------------
Overwatch Moments #109 - Duration: 10:13. For more infomation >> Overwatch Moments #109 - Duration: 10:13.-------------------------------------------
NEW GIFT WRAPPED UFO REVELATIONS FROM THE PENTAGON WHAT'S GOING - Duration: 11:48.NEW GIFT-WRAPPED UFO REVELATIONS FROM THE PENTAGON WHAT�S GOING ON
BY Jon Rappoport,
You�re walking through a sea of misinformation, disinformation, lies, speculation, goofball
theories�and suddenly, the wise men behind the curtain decide to reach out and hand you
unvarnished facts that blow your mind.
What�s going on?
We have an entirely new gambit in the UFO disclosure game.
From loudwire.com (Dec.21): �[Musician Tom] DeLonge is currently working with former Pentagon
official Luis Elizondo at To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science, which was founded by the
ex-Blink guitarist.� This is a new UFO research and merchandising outfit.
DeLonge has taken it upon himself to expose the truth about UFOs.
His new partner, Luis Elizondo, used to work for the Pentagon�and, boom, the mainstream
press is suddenly telling us that Elizondo headed up a super-secret, $22 million a year
Dept. of Defense UFO research group, from 2007 to 2012, the Advanced Aviation Threat
Identification Program (AATIP).
According to the NY Times and The Independent, the program had, and still has, metal pieces
from a UFO(s), has been studying the pieces, and doesn�t knew what they�re made of.
The press has also just released a 2004 Dept. of Defense jackpot video purporting to show
a US fighter jet off the coast of San Diego encountering a UFO, which hovers in place,
wiggles, dances around, and suddenly zooms away at a shocking velocity.
The Independent: �Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Jim Slaight were
on a routine training mission 100 miles out into the Pacific when they were asked to investigate
the object.�
�Commander Fravor told The New York Times the object was about 40ft long, had no plumes,
wings or rotors, and outpaced their F-18s.
It was big enough to churn the sea 50ft below it, he said.
My, my.
All these revelations, all of a sudden.
Bingo, bango, bongo.
Years of, �We don�t have any information, we don�t have any comment on the subject,�
and then, out of the blue, �Yes we do and here it is.�
Let all the WHY NOW?
speculations begin.
I would point out that, if this is a test to gauge public reaction to: THERE IS LIFE
ELSEWHERE IN THE UNIVERSE AND A FEW OF THEM SHOWED UP HERE�the result of the test appears
to be, so far: �Are we having the beef stew again tonight?�
This is interesting.
People aren�t crowding into the streets and going wild.
There are no parades.
Presidents of countries aren�t holding major press conferences.
I did read a piece about Trump drinking water again and possibly having trouble sipping
it.
HELLO?
WE AREN�T ALONE IN THE COSMOS.
�That�s nice.
Is this Blue Bloods a repeat?
I think I saw it a few months ago.�
Another tidbit on the secret Pentagon program: it was brought into being by Nevada Senator
Harry Reid.
He and a couple of his senate pals managed to divert a little chunk of black budget Pentagon
money to set it up.
(More yawns from the public.)
Understand: In the press stories of the past few days, there are no leaks.
The Pentagon is the source.
They�re admitting it.
They�re pushing the story.
They�re permitting a pilot, who no doubt has been bound by non-disclosure agreements,
to go public and talk to mainstream media.
As with all planned releases of this magnitude, there are always �after-analyses.� It�s
standard.
How did the public respond?
What % of the press and the public appear to have bought the story?
Are there serious doubters?
Who are they?
What are they saying?
In this case, the report might read: �Very few people seem to care.�
This in itself is informative.
People are on overload.
They�re in a trance state below the level where a claimed revelation about Life in the
Universe stirs them from their basic hypnotic state.
Also, alternatively, many people are so cynical they don�t believe what the government is
telling them.
Now, if Robert Mueller can connect a UFO to the Russians, and then to Trump, and the election,
more people might respond.
The Pentagon claims it shut down the UFO research program in 2012, because other priorities
were more important.
Really?
They captured a UFO on film doing things in space no craft on Earth can do, and they have
pieces of metal from a UFO (how did they acquire them?) which they can�t analyze and are
most likely not from this Earth�and yet they shut down the program because it was
inconsequential?
Nonsense.
One of the point men for spreading the current UFO stories is Ralph Blumenthal of the NY
Times.
The Independent:
��They [the Pentagon] have some material from these [UFO] objects that is being studied,
so that scientists can try to figure out what accounts for their amazing properties,�
Ralph Blumenthal, one of the authors of the New York Times report, told MSNBC.
Mr. Blumenthal said the DoD �do not know� what the materials are made of.
It�s some sort of compound they do not recognise,� he added.�
I have a bit of personal experience with Mr. Blumenthal.
In 1993, he wrote a shocking story for the Times about the first bombing attack on the
Twin Towers in New York.
It focused on an FBI asset and informant, Emad Salem, who asserted that he had been
instrumental in putting together the bombing plot.
His handlers at the FBI were supposed to supply him with fake bombing materials, so there
would be no explosion�however, at the last moment, they gave him actual live material.
At the subsequent trial of the defendants, Salem was absent.
He didn�t testify.
I got in touch with reporter Blumenthal some years later and asked him what happened to
Salem and why he wasn�t allowed to tell his story in the courtroom.
Blumenthal got angry with me.
He told me I didn�t understand his article.
And that was that.
In my opinion, he was backing away from his own reporting.
So now, with his UFO revelations, I have a few doubts.
It�s likely that, as Tom DeLonge and his Pentagon partner, Luis Elizondo, move forward,
promoting their To the Stars Academy (whatever that turns out to be�a movie production
company, a school, a store for UFO merchandise), they will be releasing new info on the US
government UFO discoveries.
So far, no one at the Pentagon is explaining why they�ve decided to make their revelations
public now.
The military is not in the habit of doing the public great favors that involve secret
programs.
If what the Pentagon is handing over to the mainstream press is legitimate and true Disclosure,
it is most certainly a limited hangout on what they really know.
And they will to continue to release more info, to see how the public responds, at every
step.
But they will also seek to own the story and shape it any way they want to.
Through their media fronts, they�ll sculpt the conclusions that �should be made.�
For example, suppose they go as far as this: 50 years ago, they found an alien body at
a UFO crash site in the desert.
Here are photos.
The anatomy of the corpse is definitely not human.
Since then, no other alien bodies have been seen, located, or discovered.
True?
False?
Who would know?
Because they are the source of the story.
Which is the way they want it to be.
If someone wants us to look at the truth, they disclose all the data and they open up
all the files, and they allow us to see the material evidence up close and personal, so
independent analyses can be performed.
What are the odds that this will happen?
When has this ever happened?
If anything, positioning themselves as the central source of the UFO story pushes citizen
research into the background.
Which is never a good thing.
I fully understand there will be many explanations, offered by many people, about why the Pentagon
is releasing this information now.
Here is one possibility: the secret program was really a tiny research effort; the Dept.
of Defense has actually spent extraordinary amounts of money in this effort, over a long
period of time�some of it from the trillions of dollars in the budget �they can�t account
for.� Thus, they admit to a $22 million program, as a limited hangout.
Again, THEY WANT TO OWN THE UFO STORY.
Going directly to mainstream news with it, where na�ve reporters and reporters who
are their assets will cover it exactly as the Pentagon intends�this is a major part
of what is going on.
The psyop aspect of the Pentagon revelations is all about testing and gauging public response.
Imagine that the Dept. of Defense eventually states they did find an alien body decades
ago�and then the majority reaction is: �That�s fantastic.
Did you see my car keys?
I can�t find them.�
Not only would that inform psyop professionals about the UFO reaction, it would also let
them know their decades of work, on many fronts, aimed at deadening, overloading, distracting,
and shortening public awareness has been an overall success.
The most astounding information barely causes a ripple.
�This is wonderful.
In many cases, we don�t have to figure out whether the public believes or doesn�t believe
what we tell them.
They�re in a state of mind that is �lower than belief.� The majority can�t form
beliefs or non-beliefs.
They�re firmly embedded in a passive, repetitive, Pavlovian zone��
In this regard, I refer you to my years of research on the effects of medical drugs,
and for starters, my September 13 article, �How many drug prescriptions do doctors
write per year?�:
Medical News Today reports that, in 2011, there was a modest uptick in the number of
prescriptions written in the US.
The increase brought the total to: 4.02 billion.
Yes, in 2011, doctors wrote 4.02 billion prescriptions for drugs in America.
The Medical News Today article concluded, ��the industry should be heartened by
the growth of the number of prescriptions and spending.� Yes, I�m sure the drug
industry is popping champagne corks.
We�re talking about prescriptions here.
We�re not talking about the number of pills Americans took.
We�re also not counting over-the-counter drugs or vaccine shots.
A population drugged to the gills is passive�
-------------------------------------------
KUCKIAN'S NEXT ATTACK AGAINST PETER MONN, RICH LUX, KARINA KABOOM - Duration: 5:15.Hey bitches real quick I wanted to remind you guys to please subscribe to the viewers voice down below
It is my drama channel
It is where we are doing Festivus on December 31st where everyone can come and air their grievances
And there's gonna be a lot of people air in them about John Rich and Karina
I know so I think we're gonna throw a little true flea Tricia in there, so definitely check it out down below
And I'll see you guys over there. Let's get into this heap and ass mess of a video right now
hey bitches welcome back to my channel and this video is coming to you Kareena Kapoor in style and by that I mean I
Just rolled out of bed eyes are puffy hair is greasy as fuck
What better way to impersonate her that is my opinion?
This is all I'm gonna say
But also I'm gonna give you guys two facts in this video that I for some reason dreamed up last night
And I was like I'm gonna put into a video cuz you never know you never know
there's so many things over the past few minutes that I really had to tell people I told you so I'm coming out with a
Shirt that says I told you so on it
Because I told you so so the first one is going to be what is John cook Ian's next move and this whole
Fucking thing what is the next thing that he's gonna do because obviously he has no boundaries. He has no limits, and he has nothing
first I
Want you guys to let me know what you think his next move is gonna be in this and if you ever think he's gonna
Be able to come back from this down below
But here's my thought so everyone is sitting here making videos about him rich Lux Karina kaboom
and literally
fucking
Everyone like if you go to your front page and the recommended it is all videos about John cookie and rich luxe and Karina kaboom
so
Since there are no limits and since YouTube is very fickle in the way that they like to
Just take people's channels down and take people's stuff down
You know when it shouldn't be, but when there's a reason that they should they don't even act on it um
Here's what I think the next move is gonna be I think that a lot of people are gonna start getting strikes in their Channel
I think a lot of people are gonna start having videos removed you're gonna notice a lot of videos. Just going blank because
He's gonna sit at home with all the time that he has and he's going to literally strike
Everyone fucking down rich might do the same. I'm not so sure about rich though because rich if he did it
Which still has a YouTube career rich could still come back from this and rise from the ashes that he was?
even though he has those fake-ass apologies and
that mess
But I really do see that being John's next step as just striking people because there's blue
Nothing else he can do he's gonna end up getting removed from YouTube
He's gonna end up getting taken down, and he did there's no coming back from it. There's no like okay?
I was sorry even though people want him to apologize got an apology is nice
But you know it's not fucking real wiping waste your time listening to the damn apology to be fucking honest
So I think that's the next move that's just my opinion if you have a different opinion. Let me know down below, but also
Who do you really think is the mastermind behind all of this because I really sat and thought about the other day like yeah
John is mean John made this video a Peter John has made countless videos of people
But it's been in people's dm's as well try like taught - he was in her DM something
She's a vile person on earth or something
I don't know what the photosensitive thing wasn't there that I couldn't see for some reason her screen shot, but
There but then you pull in rich and Karina into the mix and you know
I'm going with Karina in my mind
I think that Karina is like the silent serpent that fucking gets everyone
She vials everyone up behind the scenes and the message that I have from John asking about the videos with Sanders
It was Karina was telling me this
He always hear about Karina Ashley Kyle just mentioned Karina kaboom in her video and said that she was very
Disgusting on the phone very vile and just like new bleah oh, she's gross
And then you have John and you have rich who I think are the puppets
I think that Karina saw a very good spot when John came onto the scene
And of course she jumped right on it cuz she knew that he had something and she knew that he was going to
Literally get his rise if you believe that he got his rise just because of the video or if there were subscribers bought and views
but who knows
But Karina is always in the mix of it
And I really feel like she is the one that roused everyone up and gets everyone to the point up
She's a nasty vile
vile
vile
Vile woman and even in the day before John's video came out all of a sudden. She's saying something like well
You know if you bite people they're gonna bite you back or something
She's always putting something in there like the one that she did about
Peter what is it that she said last year was like?
Don't fuck with me you will get taken down something she said something
I can't even remember what it was I was so long ago, but she's just saying
She always bullies fucking everyone
but
she doesn't do anything like it will never come from her end it always comes from her two little friends then and then she'll just
Speak on it briefly in a video
I don't get it. Let me know in the comments. These are some thoughts that I had while I was sleeping and you know
Open up your new ideas out there, but let me know in the comments as I said
I love you guys, please subscribe to the viewers voice down below which is going to be my drama channel
It's going to be coming out so these videos are going to stop on this channel
And they are going to move over there probably have a few on here still but on December 30th is the viewers voice
Festivus where anybody can come on in Festivus and trust me we're festively John cookie and rich, luxe a
True flea Trisha a bunch of fucking people it's gonna be a great time anyone's invited and yeah
There is no censors on that channel, so I love you guys. I'll see you guys in my next video. Bye
-------------------------------------------
Funny customers Prank || দোকানদার কাস্টমার | Stupid People - Duration: 1:42. For more infomation >> Funny customers Prank || দোকানদার কাস্টমার | Stupid People - Duration: 1:42.-------------------------------------------
Happy New Year 2018 - Duration: 1:38.Happy New Year 2018
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét