CRASHED INTO HIS CAR, CRUSHING
THE HOOD.
IT HAPPENED NEAR HAMPTON AVENUE.
AS BEN HUTCHISON REPORTS, THE
DRIVER'S QUICK ACTIONS MAY HAVE
SAVED HIS LIFE.
>> THERE ARE JUST SOME THINGS
THAT ARE OUT OF YOUR CONTROL.
>> THERE IS NOTHING I COULD HAVE
DONE DIFFERENTLY EXCEPT NOT BE
THERE.
>> IT'S A DRIVE THAT ALMOST
CHANGED JOE BOBLICK'S LIFE
FOREVER ON THURSDAY MORNING.
HE WAS ON I-43 NEAR HAMPTON
AVENUE.
THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT FLU OFTEN
SUV INTO TRAFFIC.
RIGHT INTO BOBLICK'S PATH.
>> IF I HAD NOT SLAMMED ON MY
BREAKS, IT WOULD GONE THROUGH MY
WINDOW.
>> HE WAS ABLE TO PULL HIS CAR
TO THE SIDE, WHERE HE WAITED FOR
HELP TO ARRIVE.
THESE PHOTOS SHOW THE
SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE.
>> IF I HAD BEEN TEXTING OR
TALKING ON THE PHONE, I WOULD
NOT HAVE HIT THE BRAKES, AND IT
WOULD HAVE KILLED ME.
>> THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL
INCIDENTS INVOLVING TIRES IN THE
LAST DECADE IN MILWAUKEE COUNTY.
IN 2015, ON I-94, A TIRE HIT
THIS CAR.
THE DRIVER WASN'T HURT.
IN 2014, ON I WOMAN ESCAPED WITH
-43, A MINOR INJURIES.
AND IN 2007, A WELL KNOWN
CARDIOLOGIST WAS KILLED WHEN A
TIRE WENT THROUGH HIS WINDSHIELD
.
For more infomation >> Driver has close call on highway - Duration: 1:29.-------------------------------------------
НОВЫЙ АККАУНТ - Duration: 1:41.
For more infomation >> НОВЫЙ АККАУНТ - Duration: 1:41. -------------------------------------------
「We Bare Bears(熊熊遇見你） 前傳集數 」: 尋路記第一段The road (CC字幕) - Duration: 2:42.
For more infomation >> 「We Bare Bears(熊熊遇見你） 前傳集數 」: 尋路記第一段The road (CC字幕) - Duration: 2:42. -------------------------------------------
Best Replays of the Week International April - Duration: 10:48.
Hello, I'm Luke Kneller and welcome to Best Replays of the Week.
In this episode we have:
a KV-5 facing a hailstorm,
a Chi-Nu-Kai out on a rampage,
and a Sniper disguised as a barn.
Are you guys ready? Let's go!
There is in English
The Waffenträger opens up cough cough cough wooow
Waffenträger Waffenträger träger träger träger träger
Waffenträger
Waffenträger Waffenträger Waffenträger Waffenträger
Waff Waff Waff
The Englishman charges in as fast as he can,
the remaining shell strikes rocks, fires!
Greedy IS-3 lets his whole team down
and we hope that he was reported and is getting a ban.
Waffenträger Waffenträger träger träger träger träger
Waffenträger
Waffenträger Waffenträger Waffenträger Waffenträger
Waff Waff Waff
There is no umlaut in English
April Fools!
Remember the season is over? No?
Well don't worry, we'll be back with fresh episodes before you know it
but I couldn't help myself.
I'm Luke Kneller. Thanks for watching and I'll see you next time.
In one take! Boom!
-------------------------------------------
Qué no Se Te ocurra Ignorar estos 9 Sintomas Del Estres - Duration: 4:27.
For more infomation >> Qué no Se Te ocurra Ignorar estos 9 Sintomas Del Estres - Duration: 4:27. -------------------------------------------
ประกาศรางวัล ผู้โชคดีจาก Line เจ๋อโบกวนจีน (พร้อมแจกเงิน) - Duration: 2:04.
วันนี้เจ๋อเจ๋อจะมาแจกรางวัลให้กับผู้โชคดี 2 ท่านกัน
แต่ก่อนอื่นต้องทำแบบนี้
ไม่มีรายมาาาาาากกกก
แค่อยากบอกว่า
ไม่มีไรมากกกกก
บอกรักผัว
เค้าบอกรักผัว
นี่อยากบอกว่า
ถูกหวยยยยยย เย่ๆๆๆๆ
ถูกหวยแล้ว
เต็ง โต๊ด บน ล่าง
รวยๆๆๆๆ
โอ้ย วันนี้อารมณ์ดีขั้นสุดเลยอ่ะ
เพราะฉะนั้น
เจ๋อเจ๋อจะแจกตังค์ให้ท่านผู้ชมทุกคนเลย
เพียงแค่คุณโทรเบอร์นี้
มาหาเจ๋อเจ๋อภายใน 5 นาทีนี้!
เจ๋อเจ๋อ ก็จะแจกตังค์ไม่มากก็น้อยนะ
รีบๆหน่อยๆ
เอ๊ะ มีคนโทรมาละ
ฮาโหล
โบโบ มึงมายุ่งทำไม
ไปไกลๆเลย
วุ้ย
ท่านผู้ชมรีบๆหน่อยนะ
เจ๋อเจ๋อจะแจกตังค์ให้ทุกคน
ไม่มากก็น้อยนะ
โบโบ อีนี่
โอ้ แม่ครับ
ใช่ครับ
ใช่ครับ
ถูกหวยครับ
ให้ตังค์คุณแม่เหรอครับ
คือ
ลูก
ลูกมีอะไรจะบอกครับ
นั่นก็คือ
สุขสันต์วันโกหก!
愚人节快乐! （yú rén jié kuài lè ）
ขอโทษด้วยนะครับ
ความจริงแล้ว เจ๋อเจ๋อ โดนหวยแดก
เฮ้อ เสียใจมาก เมื่อไหร่จะรวยอ่ะ
โอเค ไม่เป็นไร
เข้าเรื่องเลย
ขอบคุณทุกๆที่ แอด Line มา
และแนะนำคลิปอย่างล้นหลาม
เราเลยได้ใช้วิธีวัดดวง
จับชื่อผู้โชคดีมา 2 คน
และท่านผู้ชม 2 คนนี้ก็คือ
ขอแสดงความยินดีด้วยนะครับ
ผู้โชคดีให้ติดต่อพวกเรา ผ่านทางไลน์เลยนะครับ
สุดท้าย ขอบคุณทุกคนอีกที
ขอให้ทุกคนเรียนจีน สนุกๆ
กับเจ๋อโบกวนจีน
เรามีคลิปใหม่มาให้ชมกันทุกวันพุธ
อย่าลืมชมกันนะครับ
และก็ทุกคนก็สามารถถามเกี่ยวกับการเรียนจีน
ผ่านทางไลน์ เจ๋อโบกวนจีน ด้วยนะครับ
โอเค วันนี้เท่านี้ก่อน
แล้วเจอกันใหม่ วันพุธหน้า
บ๊ายบาย
-------------------------------------------
Regents Exam | Algebra I (Common Core) | August 2016 | Problem 37 of 37 - Duration: 5:16.
Regents Exam Algebra 1 August 2016 Problem number 37.
For a classic picnic, two teachers went to the same store to purchase drinks.
One teacher purchased 18 juice boxes and 32 bottles of water, and spent 19 dollars and
92 cents.
The other teacher purchased 14 juice boxes and 26 bottles of water, and spent 15 dollars
and 76 cents.
Write a system of equations to represent the costs of a juice box, j, and a bottle of water,
w. Kara said that the juice boxes might have
cost 52 cents each and that the bottle of water might have cost 33 cents each.
Use your system of equations to justify that Kara's prices are not possible.
Solve your system of equations to determine the actual cost, in dollars, of each juice
box and each bottle of water.
In this problem we need to write the system of equations that represents the cost of the
items purchased.
We also need to show that a particular price for the items bought is incorrect and not
possible.
Lastly we need to solve the system of equations to find the true cost of the items bought.
Let's start by writing out the system of the equations.
Using the facts of the problem we know that our variables are going to be the price of
the juice box j and the bottled water w.
We know from the problem that the first teacher bought 18 juice boxes and 32 bottles of water,
the teacher ended up paying a total of 19 dollars and 92 cents, so if we take the number
of each item bought and multiply each item with their respective price it should equal
19 dollars and 92 cents.
A second teacher also purchased 14 juice boxes and 26 bottles of water, and spent 15 dollars
and 76 cents.
Similar to the first equation, we take the number of each item purchased and multiply
them with their respective price, the total should equal 15 dollars and 76 cents.
So this is our system of equations.
Next we need to show that the juice boxes and the bottles of water did not cost 52 and 33
cents respectively.
We can proof this by contradiction, let's assume that a juice box and a bottle of water
did cost 52 and 33 cents respectively then these prices should satisfy the system of
equations that we wrote in the previous step.
Substituting these prices into the first and second equation should yield a true statement
for both equations.
Substituting the prices and simplifying we obtain the following.
Notice that the prices yielded a true statement for the first equation but not for the second
equation recall that a solution to a system of equations needs to satisfy both equations
and not just one.
Therefore the prices that Kara suggested are incorrect.
The final question is asking us to solve the system of equations to find the actual cost
of the items.
We can solve this system by graphing the equations or by using the substitution or elimination
method.
Let's go ahead and solve this system by using the elimination method.
For this method we first need to choose a variable to eliminate, usually the variable
that has the smallest coefficient is the best variable to eliminate, in this case let's
eliminate the variable j.
In order to eliminate this variable we need to multiply both equations by a constant so
that the coefficients are additive inverses of one another.
Notice that the numbers 18 and 14 have 2 as a common factor this means that we need to
multiply the first equation by 7 and the second equation by 9 in order to obtain a common
coefficient in this case 126.
We also need to make one of these constants negative so let's make the constant 7 negative,
keep in mind that we are free to choose which constant becomes negative.
Multiplying the equations and simplifying we obtain the following.
Next we go ahead and add the equations together, notice that the variable j is eliminated leaving
us with an equation with a single variable in this case w.
Solving for w we obtain 0.24.
The last step is to substitute this value into one of the original equations and solve
for the other variable in this case j. substituting the value for w into the first equation and
solving for j we obtain 0.68.
So the price of the juice box was 68 cents and the price of the bottled water was 24 cents.
So this is our final answer.
-------------------------------------------
How to Travel without Check-In Luggage - Scoot - Duration: 1:53.
The following infomercial is a paid for presentation.
Put your hands together for the Super-Seller himself...
... Sky Scooter!
Hey there, I'm Sky Scooter,
and I'm here to tell you about my latest invention
that's flying off the shelves!
It's the super sticky, ultra grippy', Velcro suit 2000.
That's right. Velcro… In a Suit.
And with its super human strength, it can grab on to absolutely anything.
It's the ultimate frequent flyer accessory,
for both men...
...and women
Available in all sizes, and a range of stylish designs.
There you have it, it's changing lives all over the world.
But don't take his word for it…
Try it for yourself!
Before the Velcro Suit 2000,
I had to hold all my duty free swag like a sucker.
Well not anymore!
Own the suit for just 69 easy payments of $14.95.
But wait…
Forget the Velcro suit, here's something even better!
It's called the supersized extra cabin bag from Scoot.
That's 10 kilos for all your regular stuff…
With an extra 7 kilos available for purchase.
Wow!
For all your carry-on needs there's one obvious choice.
If you want to learn more flying tips and tricks,
just click on these videos!
-------------------------------------------
└ IMAGINE ┘ FaceTime with JIN ♡ - Duration: 2:21.
That was quick.
Weren't you up to something?
You answered my call so fast.
Did you miss me?
I did.
I know I saw you earlier today, but...
I like seeing you.
I hope you don't mind me being clingy.
I wish you decided to come along.
The sunset is so pretty.
The colors fade into each other like a painting.
And the smell of strawberries is everywhere.
It's nice.
Look at this.
Your favorite berry.
Yummy.
Too bad you aren't here.
I know you love strawberries.
Oh well.
Is the guilt-trip working?
But, don't worry. I'll bring some home.
Just for you.
You'll like that.
Well,
The faster I pick these,
the faster I can get home to feed you berries.
Sound nice?
There's so many.
Alright.
Maybe we can
make a few
desserts with these. Pies and tarts.
Alright, love. I have to hang up.
Just so I can pick these and hurry home.
Okay.
See you soon.
-------------------------------------------
Inspirational Music From (Kevin Kern Though The Arbor) Enchanted Piano Album - Duration: 3:24.
Have a beautiful and lovely time listening to music from Kevin Kern.
-------------------------------------------
2人の女神様 強波動ジャークベイトで春バスを追え！ パーフェクト10ログ プラドコTVバス釣り動画 - Duration: 26:06.
For more infomation >> 2人の女神様 強波動ジャークベイトで春バスを追え！ パーフェクト10ログ プラドコTVバス釣り動画 - Duration: 26:06. -------------------------------------------
[HARD TRAP - project file] BITCHES (FREE DOWNLOAD) (CAUSTIC 3) - Duration: 1:56.
today
i'll give you
my hard trap
project file
for caustic 3
i don't want to talk too much
so,let's skip it
that's enough right ?
so,let's check the other
-------------------------------------------
Anita Moorjani 艾妮塔.穆札尼 實況問答 9-22-2016 (中文字幕 Chinese subtitles) - Duration: 24:37.
For more infomation >> Anita Moorjani 艾妮塔.穆札尼 實況問答 9-22-2016 (中文字幕 Chinese subtitles) - Duration: 24:37. -------------------------------------------
Glitchtale Season 1 Abridged (by Max Out of Ten) - Duration: 6:38.
For more infomation >> Glitchtale Season 1 Abridged (by Max Out of Ten) - Duration: 6:38. -------------------------------------------
서든어택포인트가없던시절??넷마블시절GOGO [서든어택꿀잼라포TV] - Duration: 20:28.
For more infomation >> 서든어택포인트가없던시절??넷마블시절GOGO [서든어택꿀잼라포TV] - Duration: 20:28. -------------------------------------------
SpaceX Hits a Milestone; No Need for Dark Energy?; SFN Goes to Washington - Duration: 12:43.
Hello Space Fans and welcome to another edition of Space Fan News.
This week, SpaceX completes an important milestone its quest to make rocket launches into Earth
orbit cheaper; astronomers have found a way to have an accelerating universe without dark
energy; and Space Fan News goes to Washington to march for science on April 22nd.
Yesterday, from the historic launch pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Center the SpaceX Corporation
achieved a huge milestone in making access to space cheaper.
For the first time, SpaceX reused one of its rockets to launch a communication satellite
known as SES-10, which will bring high capacity satellite service to Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador
and Peru.
With yesterday's launch, SpaceX has proven that it can recover, restore and relaunch
a critical component of the Dragon 9 launch vehicle and doing this means that it can get
stuff into orbit cheaper.
The hope is that the more they can do this, the cheaper it will be to put stuff into space.
The entire Dragon 9 rocket isn't reused, only the massive first stage, but if companies
choose to launch their payloads using a refurbished first stage, then SpaceX reports they can
save up to 30 percent of the cost of the launch.
And since the cost to launch a Falcon 9 starts at around $60 million, launching on a used
rocket could start at around $40 million.
Yesterday's launch used the second rocket ever recovered by SpaceX; it was the same
vehicle used for CRS-8, the company's eighth cargo resupply mission to the International
Space Station launched almost a full year ago on April 8th, 2016.
Then they recovered it on the drone ship named Of Course I Still Love You, and started getting
it ready to use again.
It took SpaceX about 4 months to get it ready again for another launch.
As you can imagine, this process isn't easy, each component has to be inspected and refurbished
to be used again, but that's way cheaper than building them from scratch each time and
then throwing them away.
Which is the path the SLS or Space Launch System is taking.
You may be wondering why in this day and age why we would take such a wasteful approach
to getting into orbit?
That's a good question and the answer has to do with different design objectives.
Setting aside a minute the fact that Congress told NASA to build the SLS this way, there
are other reasons why recovering the SLS is impractical.
First off, the SLS is a much bigger rocket and designed to get much bigger payloads into
orbit.
It's designed to carry 5-10 times more payload.
Further, the Solid Rocket Boosters used by SLS are relatively cheap to rebuild each time
making it somewhat unnecessary.
There's not a lot left of the SRB's once they are spent to actually recover which is
why NASA never bothered with the ones on the Space Shutlle.
Then there's the SLS second stage.
It is a huge, orange tank full of cryofuels and four advanced engines.
And while it would be worth it to get these engines back, it's not really possible.
The tank itself is quite soft, mostly made of foam with a thin aluminum lining.
What's more, it carries a lot of fuel, meaning a lot of delta-V and that means it reaches
a very high speed and very high altitude.
To get it back means it needs to lose that speed and altitude.
This is quite opposite to Falcon 9's recoverable first stage, which barely reaches barely 1.5km/s
(out of about 8 km/s or so to reach orbit) and it only very shortly peeks out above the
atmosphere.
The Falcon 9 can brake and descend at reasonable, survivable speed, without burning up and without
spending excessive amounts of fuel on braking, to avoid burning up.
It is the second, non-recoverable stage that carries most of the responsibility for reaching
orbital speed.
So it's not really fair to compare the two launch designs.
While SLS will be more expensive and wasteful, it's primary purpose isn't to make space
cheap like the Falcon 9 is, it is an explorer rocket that will help NASA regain a human
launch capability and will serve as a backbone for any future human Moon and Mars missions.
Yesterday's launch was a huge step forward in commercializing space and I was very happy
to see everything go off without a hitch, the launch was spectacular, a few minutes
later the first stage landed on Of Course I Still Love You, and the SES-10 satellite
was successfully deployed.
The satellite SES company said that they did indeed get a discount on the launch but non-disclosure
agreements prevent them from giving exact numbers.
But I think more than the discount, the company really wanted to be the first one to use a
refurbished SpaceX rocket.
Next astronomers have worked out a way to have an accelerating, expanding universe without
dark energy.
According to a Hungarian-American team, they believe that standard models of the universe
fail to take into account of its changing structure, and claim that once you do that the need for
dark energy disappears.
We've known for about 20 years now that the universe was accelerating as it expands
and this cosmic surprise has had cosmologists scrambling ever since to try and explain why
it's doing that.
To explain the energy associated with the force that is causing this expansion, astronomers
reasoned that almost 70 percent of the universe must consist of whatever that is - and they
called it dark energy.
We've also known for quite a while that there's this stuff out there, called dark
matter that we seem to talk about every episode, which is out there permeating about 25 percent
or so of the cosmos.
But there are some researchers out there, led by a PhD Student at a university in Hungary,
which I'm not gonna pronounce because I'll just mess it up, who are questioning that
dark energy is really required to accelerate the universe.
These guys are arguing that the data points we have for measuring the acceleration of
the universe - which consist of observations of Type-1a supernovae throughout the sky - only
provide enough information to give us an average acceleration.
This average is throughout the whole universe and it could be, in fact it is probable, that
the universe is expanding at different rates in different areas.
The current theories, the team argues, ignore the intricate structure of the large scale
universe.
The mathematics that describe the expansion of the universe is embedded in equations from
Einstein's Theory of General Relativity and are amazingly complex.
Dr László Dobos, a co-author of the paper, explains that, "We know from very precise
supernova observations that the universe is accelerating, but at the same time we rely
on coarse approximations to Einstein's equations which may introduce serious side-effects,
such as the need for dark energy, in the models designed to fit the observational data."
When we look at the large scale structure of the universe, we see a cosmic web of galaxies
that follow huge tendrils throughout space time and normal and dark matter appear to
fill the universe with a foam-like structure, where galaxies are located on the thin walls
between bubbles, and are grouped into superclusters.
The insides of the bubbles by comparison are almost empty of both kinds of matter.
Using a computer simulation to model the effect of gravity on the distribution of millions
of particles of dark matter, the scientists reconstructed the evolution of the universe,
including the early clumping of matter, and the formation of large scale structure.
I always love saying things like 'reconstructing the evolution of the universe'.
Golden age folks!
Unlike most simulations that approximate a smoothly expanding universe, taking the structure
into account led to a model where different regions of the cosmos expand at different
rates.
The average expansion rate though is consistent with present observations, which suggest an
overall acceleration.
Which is what we see, so that's good!
Dr. Dobos concludes by saying, "The theory of general relativity is fundamental in understanding
the way the universe evolves.
We do not question its validity; we question the validity of the approximate solutions.
Our findings rely on a mathematical conjecture which permits the differential expansion of
space, consistent with general relativity, and they show how the formation of complex
structures of matter affects the expansion.
These issues were previously swept under the rug but taking them into account can explain
the acceleration without the need for dark energy."
If this finding is upheld, it could have a significant impact on models of the universe
and the direction of research in physics.
For the past 20 years, astronomers and theoretical physicists have speculated on the nature of
dark energy, but it still remains an unsolved mystery.
Nobody has any idea what this stuff is.
With this new model, these guys expect at the very least to start a lively debate.
I love science.
Finally, like this shirt?
I'm going to wear it later this month when I go to the March for Science in Washington
D.C. on April 22nd.
I also made this Deep Astronomy Hoodie in case it gets cold.
I try to keep politics out of my online life, but as many of you who have been following
me for a while know that I am passionate about improving science education in, not just the
United States, but the entire world.
I concentrate on the U.S. though because it needs it the most, we are among the worst
in the world when it comes to science literacy and I simply can't live with that.
I fervently believe that a person who has a modest education in science has an advantage
in life and is better able to make better decisions, both politically and in daily life.
It seems to me that science in my country continually takes a back seat to almost everything
else, we prioritize the wrong things, like jobs in coal country over the health of our
planet.
It makes no sense to me to burn more coal at the expense of having a home planet to
live on.
And the jobs thing doesn't cut it with me.
Don't tell me, 'well those coal miners are out of jobs and that's not fair'.
No, it's not fair, but reviving a dangerous career path fraught with environmental disasters
everywhere isn't the solution.
The solution, as I see it, is to educate people, like those miners, to do other jobs, ones
that probably pay more.
When I hear about the lack of jobs in I shake my head.
We have companies scrambling to fill jobs all over the place.
An education in science gives everyone a leg up and allows people access to more than just
one kind of job.
The days of pulling a lever all day on a factory floor are long gone, robots do that now.
What's needed are people to build and repair the robots, program CNC milling machines,
operate complicated manufacturing machinery, work with sophisticated computer controlled,
well everything, repair computerized appliances, all kinds of jobs
are not being filled because there aren't any qualified
candidates to do them.
And if you care about energy jobs, there are solar and wind power installations and renewable energy.
There are lots and lots of jobs here, the thing is, you have to know things.
You need an education, one that is heavy in the sciences.
While I do the best I can with my modest YouTube channel, there is a lot more I can do and
that's why I'm going to the March.
I've never done anything overtly political before but I feel pretty strongly about this.
I remember that Carl Sagan was politically active, I actually saw him once in the 1980's
in Colorado at a protest at the Rocky Flats nuclear weapon plant.
I'm no Carl Sagan, but, well, every little bit helps.
I'll hopefully have some remote live streaming equipment with me when I go so I'll try
to live stream it that day but I'll keep you posted on the progress of that.
If you want to talk more about this and the stuff we talked about a couple of weeks ago
about expanding SFN, please join me for another Space Fan News Live event next Wednesday at
3pm ET.
The link is in the description box below and if you click on the little bell icon on the
watch page, you'll get a reminder.
That's it for this week Space Fans.
This show is supported by SFN Patreon Patrons whose contributions make sure you see this
every Friday, so thank you very much.
Thanks to all of you for watching and as always,
Keep Looking Up!
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét