-------------------------------------------
Sia - Helium | Nathaly Laboriel ( Cover ) - Video - Duration: 4:06.
For more infomation >> Sia - Helium | Nathaly Laboriel ( Cover ) - Video - Duration: 4:06. -------------------------------------------
CL's Game-Changing Potential - Duration: 1:03.
I'm a city girl.
Where I grew up, it's like Seoul, and Tokyo, and Paris.
It's like my fans, my crowds-
I feel like they're internet kids, these days.
And there's a mix of fashion
to all the internet kids to the street fashion kids
to the high-fashion kids. It's like a mixture.
I feel like fashion-
I have a lot of passion for fashion (laughs).
I have grown so much.
I love to listen to other people's stories and advice.
I think it's important to study yourself.
I don't know if that makes sense.
And what you're good at, rather than chasing something.
I feel like that's very important
and spending a lot of time for yourself.
That's another special thing and I think it's all about balance.
That's it.
Life is about balancing.
Yin-yang (laughs).
-------------------------------------------
Quach Mengly - The Secret to Make Yourself Success | Success Reveal - Duration: 1:05:24.
Success Reveal
The Secret to make yourself success
by Oknha Quach Mengly
-------------------------------------------
Conan康納教員工如何開車feat.Kevin Hart,Ice Cube(中文字幕) - Duration: 9:50.
For more infomation >> Conan康納教員工如何開車feat.Kevin Hart,Ice Cube(中文字幕) - Duration: 9:50. -------------------------------------------
Stuff I Never Knew: Are You Going My Direction!? - Duration: 4:05.
- Hey guys, Shawn again, Custom Offsets
CustomOffsetsTV on YouTube.
Got another episode of Sh*t I Never Knew
Are You Going My Direction?
What we want to talk about, this one comes up a lot
and we touch on it a little bit with some car wheels
but we had this opportunity to get these big old
Fuel Forged wheels in here
directional wheels, directional tires.
What a lot of times you'll see
is you'll see a wheel design that has these blades that dig.
You'll be like, "That must be a directional wheel."
Not necessarily.
Sometimes what they'll do is they'll have this design
but all of the wheels, all four will go the same direction
so they'll all tip to the clockwise.
That is not a true directional wheel.
When you get into a directional wheel
note that these go clockwise
and now these are coming counter-clockwise.
What trucks typically will do, I should say always
because I think that is the general rule
is the truck should dig.
A truck should rotate this way
because it's digging into the ground.
This one is designed for the passenger side of the truck.
This guy wants to go this way
so he's going to be designed, ran over my foss glass.
He's going to be designed for the driver's side of the truck
so you'll see that they go two opposite directions.
What does that mean?
That means that you can either A, not rotate
from side to side
or B, you'll end up running the wheels backwards
when you rotate if you go side to side.
You can always go front to back
because they're going to be directional to a set.
Now let me confuse you even more
or un-confuse you even more
it depends on how you're doing
as far as keeping up.
This Free Passer tire is also directional.
What you'll see is these lugs are all headed thataway.
That means that this tire
is also designed to be on the passenger side.
When it's coming down the road
it's digging into the ground.
It's grabbing and throwing water, snow
sand, whatever it is.
Probably not mud with this fancy-ass setup.
This side you'll see is going the opposite direction
so this is going to be again your driver's side.
What you'll see on the side wall of the tire
it will actually say rotation
and it's got an arrow mark
and it tells you that this tire is designed to be mounted
with this out and that rotation headed that way
which is the same rotation
as the digging pattern of these directional wheels.
That's it, I don't want to drag this one out.
It is what it is.
Directional wheel, directional wheel
directional tire with that lug pattern
wanting to dig.
If you were to run it this way, that would be wrong
because it's coming at you going that way.
It's not funneling the water
it's basically snagging the water and whatnot.
That is the whole concept of a directional tire
directional wheel.
When you go and put these on a vehicle
you're basically going to be able to rotate
front to back front to back front to back
but if you were to rotate side to side
the wheel direction would be going the wrong way
but also your tread would be going the wrong way
and it's not going in the way it was designed
to rotate down the road
and you're going to get weird wearing issues.
That is Are You Going My Direction
Custom Offsets, CustomOffsetsTV on YouTube, peace.
(hip hop music)
-------------------------------------------
Tanda 40 Hari, 7 Hari hingga Sehari Sebelum Meninggal Dunia - YtCrash Islam - Duration: 3:41.
For more infomation >> Tanda 40 Hari, 7 Hari hingga Sehari Sebelum Meninggal Dunia - YtCrash Islam - Duration: 3:41. -------------------------------------------
Supernatural 12x17 Promo "The British Invasion" (HD) Season 12 Episode 17 Promo - Duration: 0:35.
The brothers Winchester, they're out of control.
Thursday...
Assimilate.
Or eliminate.
Nick, you don't have to do this.
Yes I do!
Supernatural, all-new Thursday at 8/7c on The CW.
-------------------------------------------
The Hive Mind 5G, Smart Grid, and the Coming 'Global Brain' - Duration: 1:38.
The Hive Mind: 5G, Smart Grid, and the Coming 'Global Brain'
A lot of people look at their smart phones and just see a little phone with a computer
in it.
They have no idea what is coming our way with the smart grid, the Internet of Things, the
Fourth Industrial Revolution, and, simply put, the technological evolution of man.
The singularity isn�t what people have been led to believe� and it�s right around
the corner.
Rick Wiles of TruNews breaks down his attendance at the this year�s Mobile World Congress
where mobile tech industry leaders cheerfully discussed the total information awareness
society and the one trillion dollar �global brain� they are building to rule over
the planet.
-------------------------------------------
Kellyanne Conway: D.C. Rockstar | TMZ Live - Duration: 5:34.
HARVEY: SO GOING STRAIGHT IN
CHARLES AND I KIND OF DISAGREE
ON THIS.
CHARLES: WE JUST HAD A --
HARVEY: WE DISAGREE ON THIS.
I WANT TO SHOW THANK YOU VIDEO.
THIS IS KELLYANNE CONWAY WALKING
THROUGH THE STREETS OF D.C.
YESTERDAY, LATE AFTERNOON.
I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE NUMBER
OF PEOPLE BUT LOOK, EVERY TIME
SHE TAKES TWO STEPS, WATCH WHAT
HAPPENS.
CHARLES: THE BACKPEDALING IS
STARTING ALREADY.
>> WE LOVE YOU SO MUCH.
YOU'RE AMAZING.
>> HI.
HOW ARE YOU?
I'M KELLYANNE.
HI, HOW ARE YOU?
>> KELLYANNE, IT SHOWS THAT
YOU'RE A WOMAN OF THE PEOPLE.
>> YOU'RE VERY WELCOME, THANKS.
>> HAVE A GOOD DAY, KELLYANNE.
>> THANKS, BYE-BYE.
CHARLES: THREE OR FOUR DIFFERENT
PEOPLE, SHE STOPPED AND TOOK
PHOTOGRAPHS.
VERY NICE OF HER TO DO THAT.
NOT KNOCKING THAT AT ALL.
HARVEY: HOWEVER, THE WEIRD THING
TO SEEMS TO ME IS THIS.
THAT, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE BECOME
CELEBRITIES FOR ALL SORTS OF
REASONS.
WE COVERED PEOPLE WHERE YOU
DON'T GET IT, THEN PEOPLE
WHERE YOU DO GET IT.
WHAT'S INTERESTING IS THAT TO
ME, OUTSIDE OF TRUMP AND
MAYBE PENCE, THE TWO MOST
VISIBLE PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON,
D.C., I THINK IT'S HER AND SEAN
SPICER.
CHARLES: AGREED.
VAN: THAT WOULD MAKE A LOT OF
SENSE IF THEY WERE THE TWO MOST-
CHARLES: THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE
VISIBLE.
THEY'RE MOUTHPIECES.
VAN: WHEN YOU SEE THE INTERVIEWS
ON BEHALF OF THE ADMINISTRATION,
IT'S SPICER AND CONWAY.
HARVEY: I LIKED JOSH, HE WAS A
GREAT PRESS SECRETARY FOR OBAMA.
DO PEOPLE REALLY RECOGNIZE --
CHARLES: WHEN YOU SPEAK IN SOUND
BITES, YOU SAY THINGS THAT
PEOPLE DISAGREE WITH.
VAN: LET'S BE HONEST.
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, THEY
WERE EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE BUT IT
WAS MORE KIND OF POLITICS AS
USUAL AS FAR AS WHAT THEY WERE
DOING.
THEY DID THINGS SOME MIGHT SAY
THE RIGHT WAYS AND SPICER AND
OTHER PEOPLE THERE HAVE BEEN
BROUGHT TO BEAR ON THINGS THAT
ARE MUCH MORE CONTROVERSIAL.
EVERY TIME SEAN PIES -- SPICER
THINKS, IT'S ABOUT SOMETHING
CONTROVERSIAL AND EVERY TIME
KELLYANNE SPEAKS, SHE'S TRYING
DEBUNK SOMETHING FROM DONALD
TRUMP.
CHARLES: WHEN SHE'S ON THE
STREET, CLEARLY THERE ARE PEOPLE
WHO ARE EMBRACING HER.
HARVEY: 40% OF THE PEOPLE ARE
DOWN WITH EVERYTHING TRUMP IS
DOING. 40% ARE AGAINST.
AND THEN THERE'S A MIDDLE
GROUND.
VAN: 37% APPROVAL RATING.
HARVEY: THEY ALSO SAID HE WAS
GOING TO LOSE THE ELECTION.
CHARLES: MATH WAS NEVER HIS
THING.
SO YOU DON'T GO BY POLLS?
HARVEY: IT MEANS NOTHING TO ME.
I REMEMBER WHEN WE STARTED
"PEOPLE'S COURT" A LONG, LONG
TIME AGO.
JUDGE WAPNER WAS THE
MOST FAMOUS JUDGE IN THE
COUNTRY.
MORE THAN ANYBODY ON THE SUPREME
COURT AND I REMEMBER IT BACK
THEN AND BEING CONSCIOUS AND
THEY ACTUALLY DID POLLING BACK
THEN.
MOVIES LIKE "THREE MINUTES TO
WOOPER IN" AND RAIN MAN," AND
STUFF LIKE THAT.
CHARLES: WHAT'S THE POINT?
HARVEY: THE POINT IT'S NOT THE
POSITION YOU HOLD, IT'S THE
PROFILE YOU HAVE AND I THINK
THEY HAVE BECOME THE TWO --
CHARLES: YOU ACTED LIKE SHE WAS
MOBBED ON THE STREETS OF D.C.
SHE TOOK THREE PHOTOS!
A VERY NICE LADY.
I'M GLAD SHE DID THAT PUT FOR
YOU TO SIT THERE AND SAY THAT --
REGAN, YOU'RE PART OF THE
PROBLEM.
D.C. ROCK STAR?
HARVEY: WHY ARE YOU SO MAD?
OWNERSHIP BECAUSE YOU'RE
TROLLING US AND YOU KNOW IT.
THAT'S WHY WE'RE MAD.
CHARLES: YOU NEED TO
ANSWER FOR THIS, AGEN.
D.C. ROCK STAR IN OH, MY GOD.
VAN: YOU'RE SELLING THIS AS IF
IT'S THE BEATLES.
SHE TOOK A COUPLE OF PICTURES.
HARVEY: WE HAVE TO GET SOME
MEDICATION RATHER THAN THOSE
CHOCOLATE PRETZELS.
CHARLES: NOTICE THAT REGAN ISN'T
SAY REVILING A WORD BECAUSE HE
CAN'T SUPPORT THIS.
REGAN: WE HAVE GUESTS HERE.
GOD.
CHARLES: ROCK STAR.
CALLER: I'M FREDERICK CALLING
FROM WASHINGTON, D.C.
I WOULD PROBABLY HAVE A
DIFFERENT REACTION WITH KELLY AS
A ROCK STAR THING.
I JUST SAW THE MOVIE GET OUT SO
IF I SEA HER AND -- SEE HER AND
SHE'S HOLDING TEACUP.
[LAUGHTER]
CHARLES: HE, MY GOD.
OH, WOW.
-------------------------------------------
Queer representation in Supergirl | Riley J. Dennis - Duration: 11:19.
It's a bird!
It's a plane!
It's… a really bad intro.
Hey everybody, I'm sorry about that.
It's just… how else do you do an intro for a video about Supergirl?
"I mean, you could actually be funny."
Anyway, so I wanna talk about queer representation specifically.
Because if you don't know, there are two girls in a relationship on Supergirl, and
a lot of people are really excited about it, a lot of people are very skeptical and critical
of, and I kinda fall somewhere in the middle.
But I should say, before we get into this, if you're just here to complain about diversity
and representation: shoo, go away.
This video isn't for you.
I obviously believe that queer representation -- and all forms of diverse representation
-- are important to have in our mainstream media, but this video isn't for arguing about that.
This video is for folks who are concerned about good queer representation in the media
and maybe have opinions on how Supergirl is handling that.
So there are gonna be a lot of spoilers here.
If you're not caught up on Supergirl yet, you might want to do that before watching this video.
But yeah, so the ship on Supergirl that I'm talking about is Sanvers -- Alex Danvers and Maggie Sawyer.
I mean, this ship is why I started watching Supergirl, because I saw gifs of them and
I was like, "Oh, cool, like queer girls on TV!
I need to watch this show."
And then I was watching the whole first season, and I was like, "Where -- where are they?
This is not what I signed up for."
Instead, there's just Supergirl with every dude in the world crushing on her.
Which is a plot complaint that I have that's kind of aside from the queer stuff.
But anyways, so in the second season, it's about Alex's coming out story, and that's
kinda tied into her relationship with Maggie.
And I had a lot of issues with the way that they handled her coming out story.
To me, it felt very much like a straight person writing a coming out story that they didn't
fully understand themselves, but they knew like the certain elements that had to be in it.
Like it really felt like the coming out story that a straight person would write.
And I don't mean that Alex's coming out story is bad; in fact, I think it's very important.
I think it's great that there's a coming out story on TV.
I don't think it's like... coming out stories are so overdone that we should never ever
ever do a coming out story again.
Um, I think, they're important, and often integral to the queer experience, and people like to
share those stories, and it's very helpful for young people to see those stories.
Um, and I don't know if the writers of Supergirl are queer -- if any of them are.
But to me, that's what it felt like.
It felt, uh, like it wasn't explored very much in-depth.
It was kind of like, "This is what we think coming out would be like," and there it is.
Um, I especially really did not like Kara's reaction to it in the beginning.
She just was very rude to Alex and just -- was awful.
And it just really made me not like Kara, and that's like the person you're supposed
to like -- that's the main character.
And then she just came around so quickly, and they have this whole like bonding, catching
up moment, and everything was fine.
But... like they never really addressed Kara's, like, pretty strong homophobic reaction.
I don't remember the language exactly because I watched the beginning of the second season
a little while ago, but I don't think they ever said "bisexual" or even hinted that that was a possibility.
It was kind of like, Alex likes girls, therefore Alex cannot like boys.
And I mean like that's fine if she is like canonically a lesbian, but like, just the
-- the idea that it's one or the other is very restricting, and, I think, very erasing of bisexual people.
In fact, I'm not even sure if they said lesbian.
They might've just said gay.
I'm really not sure.
I don't remember.
Don't take my word for that.
But I also think they touched on some things that need to be talked about within the queer community.
Like, Alex came out basically for Maggie.
But Maggie also turned her down because she didn't wanna be with like a "new gay", like
someone who had just come out.
And I think that there's problematic aspects to both of those sides that weren't really taken into account.
Like it's great if someone can help you feel comfortable coming out -- but, your coming
out shouldn't be for a person.
Like, coming out is a very personal, private thing that you have to do for yourself.
And while I think it can be tempting to come out because you want to be with a specific
person, it's like you're not guaranteed to be with that person because you came out.
They don't owe you that.
Like it's not a deal that you're like, "If I come out, we will date forever," you know?
Like, you don't get to trap them into a relationship by being like, "Well I came out for you, like
what'd you do for me?"
And I think everyone's coming out story is different, and some people do have an aspect
of a relationship that helped them realize that they wanted to come out.
So I don't think it's like necessarily a bad thing, but I think that's an interesting conversation
to be had that was touched on in the episode and then just never really talked about.
And likewise, Maggie's attitude towards Alex as being like, "Oh I don't wanna date someone
who's fresh out of the closet."
That also touches on some issues in the queer community
that maybe we should be talking more about.
Like is there discrimination against people who have just come out?
Are queer people who come out later in life somehow less valid or less queer because they
didn't figure it out until then?
I definitely don't think so.
And I don't think Maggie does either, but that was kind of the implication in what she
was saying -- that Alex hasn't become a full queer yet.
And so again I just think that's something they could've explored more of, uh, and never really did.
And so now, in the second half of the second season, we see little bits of them.
We see them here and there.
They're spending nights together.
They kiss every once in awhile.
Which I think is great.
I think it's amazing that that kind of relationship is just being
normalized in what is basically a mainstream show.
I think it's really good that they're not afraid to give them problems.
I think a lot of time, there's a tendency to go in one direction or the other, and it's
to either make them the perfect couple, um, that's just infallible -- or, it's to make
their story too tragic and to make it clear that like they can never actually have happiness.
When in reality, a lot of the time, it's both.
It's sadness, and drama, and it's happiness.
And so I do feel like in giving them problems and giving them relationship problems, it normalizes them more.
Because, like, queer relationships aren't perfect.
They have their problems too.
And a lot of times, queer people are afraid to talk about those, because we want to convince
people that our relationships are valid.
So having them fight sometimes, having them also just be in the background being happy
sometimes, I think is a nice balance.
I think there's definitely an argument to be made that I've seen a lot of people making
that they don't get enough screentime.
Especially in the second half of this season, they've really moved towards Kara and Mon-El
as like the big relationship thing, and kind of pushed Sanvers on the backburner.
Obviously I think that sucks.
But like, they are kind of side characters, as opposed to Kara who's like the main character.
But like I wouldn't complain with some more Sanvers screen time.
Maybe going more in their backstories, especially Maggie's, who we really don't know a lot about.
Um, instead, we're getting this whole Kara/Mon-El storyline, and I just think
they're a bad relationship -- entirely.
They're that classic kind of straight relationship where the guy is just an asshole until the
girl likes him, and it's just, "What?
That's not -- uh, that's not, uh, healthy.
That's not good."
He's awful.
He's like a prince from this planet where they had slaves, and he just objectified women.
And like, he seems really okay with that.
His transition into a relatively progressive Earth society seems a little too easy to me.
I mean, he was really bad on Daxum.
They just seem to have fallen for each other because they both have powers because they're
both not from Earth.
I don't know, the relationship just feels very forced to me.
Meanwhile, the relationship between Kara and Lena Luthor.
They -- I feel like they have to be doing this intentionally because if you watch some
of the scenes with Kara and Lena in it, there's some very obvious tension between them.
Lena will like stare down Kara, and like bite her lip at her, and they'll have this like
witty, flirty banter between each other.
They're very flirty.
They just -- they are.
I don't know how you can watch the scenes between them and not think that they're flirting with each other.
Like, they have such obvious chemistry that Kara and Mon-El don't -- that I just -- why
-- the ship name is called Supercorp.
Why is Supercorp not a thing?
Supercorp is a weird ship name, but I think it's because Lena's company is L Corp, and Supergirl, so Supercorp?
Corps?
Sure.
But really, that's the ship we should all be aiming for, is Supercorp.
Because it's so obvious and authentic and and good.
But no, unfortunately we get Karamel.
Is that what Kara and Mon-El are called?
That's also just an unfortunate ship name.
Overall, my opinion is that the Sanvers relationship is good representation -- maybe okay representation.
I'm appreciative that it exists.
Kudos to the writers and the people working on this show for putting in a queer relationship.
I think that's really important, I think it's great to be trying to do that, and to be trying
to get more visibility in the media.
But at the same time, It's also important to recognize that we could do better.
And I don't mean to say that in like a "nobody should ever try because they're gonna get
it perfect" kinda way.
I just think that people who are queer need to be in the process of creating these stories.
They need to be behind the scenes, writing it, and directing it, and producing it, and
like, controlling the story.
Otherwise I think it's inevitable that you get queer stories that feel like they're made by straight people.
But I love that children can see this on TV and see themselves represented and know that
it's okay for them to be like that.
And at the same time, I think that Supergirl as a show is just nosediving for me.
It's not great.
The Kara Mon-El stuff is really bugging me, and Supercorp is so obvious and so not happening.
And also, really, why does everyone have a crush on Kara?
Like I get it, she's great but like every guy who appears in this show has a crush on her.
And a lot of the girls, I'm pretty sure.
Definitely Lena.
Lena's crushing hard on Supergirl.
Uh, and this isn't even mentioning how Supergirl ties in with the Flash, which is like, I've
almost caught up on the Flash at this point.
Um, I was really trying to give it a chance because it's in the same universe, but it's
just -- it's gotten to the point where it's unbearable.
There's just -- there's no strong female leads.
There's very few.
The show rarely passes the Bechdel test.
Even Caitlin, she has powers, but can't use them, so there's like no good female superheroes.
And the supervillains that they get, who are women, are always like a seductress kind of
person who Cisco can like flirt with.
That show is just a train wreck of representation in my opinion.
And also just a poorly written story.
It's confusing and awkward and just doesn't make sense a lot of the time.
Like he's so fast that he can run around and like grab the guns out of like 27 people's
hands in under a second, but then like, one bad guy with a superpowered gun can like shoot him.
Like that's just -- I don't think they're estimating the speed stuff correctly.
And I've heard mixed things about Legends of Tomorrow, which I think is also in the same universe.
Cause they did like a crossover once, and that there's a bi girl in there who like dies
and then comes back to life -- I think.
I haven't watched the show yet, but I have heard mixed things about it.
I think I might watch it at some point.
I've probably given up on the Flash at this point.
Maybe I'll start Legends of Tomorrow.
I don't know.
Is it worth it?
I'll probably keep watching Supergirl just cause like I'm committed to it now.
And I really wanna believe that the Mon-El thing can end and we can move on and focus
on some other better relationships.
But yeah, so that's my opinion on like queer representation within Supergirl.
I would love to hear your opinions about it.
I don't think that my opinion is the only valid one.
I think that there is totally valid criticism out there, and I think there's a lot of reason
to be excited for this show as well.
So tell me in the comments, what do you think about Supergirl, and it's queer representation?
Also, are you excited for the Power Rangers?
I am so excited.
The yellow Power Ranger is gonna be a queer Latina.
The blue Power Ranger is black and autistic.
There's just such great representation in the Power Rangers, and I didn't even like
the Power Rangers growing up, but I'm all for it.
I really hope this movie is good, because I'm so hyped for it.
I just wanted to mention that because I'm excited and it's relevant to the whole queer representation thing.
So yeah, anyways, thank you so much for watching this video, I love you all, and I'll see you next time.
-------------------------------------------
Lawmakers propose radical change to California healthcare - Duration: 2:01.
DRAMATICALLY UNDER THIS SINGLE
PAYER PLAN THAT ULTIMATELY FALLS
ON TAXPAYERS.
KATHERINE KENNEDY HAS BEEN A
REGISTERED NURSE FOR 37 YEARS.
>> WE SEE IT EVERY DAY WHERE W
HAVE PATIENTS THAT DIDN'T HAVE
INSURANCE AND NEED THE CAR
MIKE: UNDER THE HEALTHY
CALIFORNIA ACT, EVERY RESIDENT
OF THE GOLDEN STATE WOULD BE
GUARANTEED HEALTH CARE.
FULL COVERAGE FOR ALL 39 MILLION
OF US.
UNDER LEGISLATION SPONSORED BY
THE CALIFORNIA NURSES
ASSOCIATION.
>> HEALTH CARE IS A GUARANTEE.
IT SHOULD BE A RIGHT.
IT ISN'T ABOUT WHAT YOU CAN
AFFORD AND AS A NURSE WE
ADVOCATE FOR PEOPLE DAY IN AND
DAY OUT.
THIS IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
MIKE: THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WOULD PAY FOR ALL EMERGENCY CARE
UNDER THE BILL, ALONG WITH ALL
MEDICAL CARE, DENTAL CARE,
VISION CARE AND MENTAL HEALTH,
ALONG WITH NURSING HOME CARE
THE HEALTHY CALIFORNIA ACT WOULD
ELIMINATE CO-PAYS AND INSURANCE
DEDUCTIBLES.
CALIFORNIANS COULD CHOOSE THEIR
DOCTORS FROM A FULL LIST OF
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, WITH
REFERRALS NOT REQUIRED BEFORE
SEEING ANY PROVIDER.
>> IT SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD IDEA
BUT I DON'T THINK IT'S FEASIBLE.
MIKE: MELINDA RODRIGUEZ OF
HAYWARD WONDERS HOW MUCH THE
PLAN WOULD COST.
THERE'S NO ANSWER YET FROM T
BILL'S AUTHORS, AND THAT SPELLS
TROUBLE FOR KRISTIN MULLARD OF
EL DORADO HILLS.
>> AS A CONSUMER I THINK I WOULD
PREFER TO STAY AWAY FROM THE
STATE RUNNING IT JUST BECAUSE
WE'RE UNSURE OF THEIR AREA OF
EXPERTISE.
SICK AND TIRED OF PEOPLE
GETTING SICKER.
MIKE: UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE WAS
A KEY COMPONENT OF BERNIE
SANDERS CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT
LAST YEAR.
BUT GOVERNOR BROWN HAS EXPRESSED
CONCERNS ABOUT COST.
>> WHERE DO YOU GET THE MONEY?
MIKE: CALIFORNIA HAS TRIED THIS
BEFORE, INTRODUCING A SINGLE
PAYER PLAN BACK IN 2010.
>> AND AT THAT TIME IT WAS
ESTIMATED THAT THE COST OF A
SINGLE PAYER WOULD GROW TO ABOUT
$250 BILLION, WITH A "B."
MIKE: BUT SINCE THAT TIM
CALIFORNIA HAS GROWN BY TWO
MILLION PEOPLE, SO THE COSTS OF
UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE COULD BE
EVEN HIGHER TODAY.
>> I LIKE THE IDEA.
BUT I QUESTION HOW THEY'RE GOING
TO COME UP AND PAY FOR IT.
-------------------------------------------
Fewer trust Trump than major news networks - Duration: 2:26.
Fewer trust Trump than major news networks
By GABBY MORRONGIELLO
More people are willing to place their trust in news outlets President Trump has regularly
criticized than in the president himself, according to a new poll.
A Monmouth University poll released Wednesday found that 58 percent are more likely to trust
ABC News � an outlet described as "totally biased and fake news" by Trump � than the
president.
Forty-seven percent of respondents said they would trust MSNBC, which was recently criticized
for over-hyping an on-air release of Trump tax documents from 2005, over the president
and 37 percent said they would trust Fox News more than Trump.
Fewer than 35 percent said they would trust Trump over ABC or MSNBC, while only 17 percent
of respondents said they would trust him over Fox News.
The poll comes at a time of increasing hostility between Trump and the media.
In a series of tweets Wednesday morning, the president said the New York Times' coverage
has been "worse" since he entered office and other outlets have covered his administration
"viciously and inaccurately."
But even as some Americans remain reluctant to trust Trump over major news outlets, the
media as a whole has suffered a blow to its credibility under Trump.
Nearly 40 percent of respondents in the same poll said traditional media sources have a
tendency to publish "fake news" in order to advance a certain narrative or political agenda.
And more than 60 percent of Americans said major TV and print outlets are guilty of disseminating
"fake news."
"Many Americans believe that fake news is rampant across all types of media.
The main outcome of this phenomenon seems to be that all news media outlets are now
eyed with suspicion," Monmouth University polling director Patrick Murray said in a
statement.
The survey of 801 U.S. adults was conducted from March 2-5.
Results contain a margin of error plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
-------------------------------------------
Tan Organic EcoCertified Self Tan Lotion Mitt - Duration: 10:35.
For more infomation >> Tan Organic EcoCertified Self Tan Lotion Mitt - Duration: 10:35. -------------------------------------------
Divigando Canais 5|JumineCraft| - Duration: 10:36.
For more infomation >> Divigando Canais 5|JumineCraft| - Duration: 10:36. -------------------------------------------
Debris piles up around Folsom Lake - Duration: 1:51.
IT'S A PROCESS THAT HASN'T BEEN
USED SINCE 2006.
FOR JEREMIAH RAMIREZ AND MIKE
HURLEY, FISH ARE TOP OF MIND
TODAY.
>> WITH THE WIND, BUT, YOU KNOW,
THAT KIND OF MAKES IT TOUGH, BUT
YOU KNOW, GOT A COUPLE TRICKS.
WE'LL SEE IF THAT WORKS.
MAX: BEFORE THEY CAN CAST THEIR
REELS, THEY'LL HAVE TO NAVIGATE
A FOLSOM LAKE PLAYING HOST TO A
COLLECTION OF DRIED OUT, DEAD
DRIFTWOOD.
>> YOU CAN'T REALLY DO MUCH
ABOUT IT, YOU JUST, YOU JUST
HAVE TO TRY TO STEER OUT OF THE
WAY, AND, YOU KNOW, HOPE YOU'RE
NOT HITTING NOTHING THAT'S, YOU
KNOW, SUBMERGED.
MAX: DRIFT WOOD IN THE WATER IS
ONE CONCERN.
THE OTHER -- THE SIZE AND SCOPE
OF THIS DEBRIS FIELD.
IT EXTENDS TO THE BOAT RAMPS AND
TO THE PARKING LOTS HUNDREDS OF
YARDS AWAY FROM THE EDGE OF THE
LAKE.
A SIGN OF HOW MUCH WATER WE'VE
HAD THIS YEAR AND THEN, HOW MUCH
DEBRIS CAME DOWN WITH IT.
>> PRETTY MUCH IS A RING
COMPLETELY AROUND THE LAKE.
MAX: RICHARD PRESTON IS THE
FOLSOM LAKE STATE PARK
SUPERINTENDENT.
STATE PARKS PLANS TO CONTRACT
WITH A COMPANY TO GET ALL OF
THIS DEBRIS PICKED UP AND MOVED
OUT, SOMETHING THAT HASN'T BEEN
DONE SINCE 2006.
>> CAME DOWN FROM THE RESERVOIRS
UP ABOVE AND SOME OF THE DEBRIS
THAT'S BEEN IN THE RIVER SYSTEMS
FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS THROUGH
THE DROUGHTS AND IT PRETTY MUCH
ALL JUST FLUSHED DOWN THIS YEA
WITH THE LARGE STORMS IN JANUARY
AND FEBRUARY.
MAX: IT'LL LIKELY BE JUNE BEFORE
THE CLEANUP PROCESS CAN BEGIN
AND GETTING THE DEBRIS BACK INTO
THE WATER IS CRITICAL.
>> WE CONTRACTED WITH A COMPANY
TO COME OUT THAT HAD THESE
MINIATURE TUGBOATS AND BARGES
, AND THEY ACTUALLY WRANGLED THE
DEBRIS THAT WAS FLOATING.
MAX: FOR NOW, THESE PILES AND
WHAT RESTS AND FLOATS IN THE
WATER WILL HAVE TO REMAIN, WHICH
WILL HAVE JEREMIAH AND MIKE
KEEPING CLOSE WATCH.
>> I'M GOING TO HAVE MY BUDDY
STANDING NEAR THE FRONT AND LOOK
OUT FOR LOGS.
BASICALLY, THE LOGS, YOU HIT
THEM, IT CAN DAMAGE THE BOAT.
THE FIBERGLASS, CRUNCH IT.
-------------------------------------------
Arcanjo Gabriel - (entrega, Confiança e Fé) - Duration: 1:30.
For more infomation >> Arcanjo Gabriel - (entrega, Confiança e Fé) - Duration: 1:30. -------------------------------------------
Steve Mnuchin is wrong Robots really could take your job - tech and science - Duration: 2:12.
Steve Mnuchin is wrong: Robots really could take your job
This hasn�t been a good week for Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.
First it came out that the department he leads is in the midst of an internal power struggle
between moderates and populist purists.
Now his comment on Friday that downplayed the threat of robots� taking human jobs
has been debunked.
When asked about the threat to employment posed by fully autonomous robots � that
is, machines that don�t need to be operated by humans and can replace humans at their
jobs � Mnuchin told Axios, �It�s not even on our radar screen . . . 50-100 more
years� away.
After reiterating that he was �not worried at all,� Mnuchin added, �In fact I�m
optimistic.�
A new study by the National Bureau of Economic research has shown that every fully autonomous
robot added to an American factory has reduced employment by 6.2 workers, according to a
report by BuzzFeed.
The study also found that for every fully autonomous robot per 1,000 workers, the employment
rate declined 0.18 to 0.34 percentage points and wages dipped 0.25 to 0.5 percentage points.
�We estimate large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages across commuting
zones,� economists Daron Acemoglu of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and
Pascual Restrepo of Boston University wrote in the study.
They also pointed out that �the impact of robots is distinct from the impact of imports
from China and Mexico, the decline of routine jobs, offshoring, other types of IT capital,
and the total capital stock (in fact, exposure to robots is only weakly correlated with these
other variables).�
-------------------------------------------
Crime victims call on Stockton leaders for new safety priorities - Duration: 1:53.
S.
KCRA3'S MELINDA MEZA INTRODUCES
US TO THE VICTIMS.
>> MY SON JUWAN WAS MURDERED 15
MONTHS AGO HERE IN STOCKTON.
MELINDA THIS MOTHER SAYS SHE HAS
: COME TO THIS GATHERING TO
SHARE HER VOICE.
AFTER HER SON WAS MURDERED HIS
KILLER HAS NOT BEEN FOUND.
>> JUWAN MURDERED DECEMEBR 14 HE
-- DECEMBER 14, 2015.
WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT TOOK
PLACE.
HE LEFT HOME TO PICK UP SHOES
FROM FRIEND AND SOMEONE SHOT
HIM.
HE DIED AFTER BEING SHOT ON
CORNER OF AND SWAIN.
MELINDA SHE IS ATTENDING THIS
: EVENT WITH OTHER VICTIMS OF
CRIME TO ASK THE COMMUNITY TO
STEP UP.
>> WE NEED HELP.
WE NEED STOCKTON'S HELP.
I GO TO THIS INTERSECTION EVERY
DAY AND SIT THERE AT 4:30 P.M.
TO SEE HOW MANY CARS COME
THROUGH.
THAT INTERSECTION IS BUSY.
25-30 CARS.
>> A ROUND OF APPLAUSE.
A SHOW OF SUPPORT FOR OTHER
SURVIVORS OF CRIME.
TODAY MORE THAN A HUNDRED PEOPLE
, LISTEN TO STORIES STORIES OF
, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, STORIES OF
HOMICIDES.
>> WE HAVE BEEN ON JOURNEY OF
HEALING AND EMPOWERING OTHERS TO
HEAL.
THERE IS POWER THERE.
MELINDA TASHITA MCCOYHAM SAYS
: THE STORIES WILL LEAD TO
ANSWERS.
SHE WORKS FOR THE STOCKTON
TRAUMA AND RECOVERY CENTER.
>> THERE IS SO MANY UNSOLVED
CASES AND WE NEED TO START
GETTING THEM SOLVED.
MELINDA ANN MARGARET RAMERIZ'S
: SON WAS SHOT TO DEATH IN 2012.
SINCE THEN SHE HAS BEEN INVOLVED
WITH THE GROUP VICTIMS OF
VIOLENT CRIME.
>> WE NEED WITNESSES TO START
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét