Zico - She's a baby, sorry
Zico - She's a baby, sorry
Zico - She's a baby, sorry
Zico - She's a baby, sorry
Zico - She's a baby, sorry
-------------------------------------------
MAINSTREAM MEDIA VS THE AGE OF INFORMATION - Duration: 9:45.MAINSTREAM MEDIA VS.
THE AGE OF INFORMATION
BY Ethan Indigo Smith
The information age is changing entirety.
It has changed and continues to change so rapidly that many of us, many times, find
ourselves playing catch-up, not just with trends of communication but also with shifts
in the flow of information itself.
The internet provides access to information and education on everything from politics
to physics.
Indeed we are presently more capable of being knowledgeable than other group of people to
have ever lived.
Internet communication devices are almost like having a key to the Akashic Field; we
can tap into practically all information anywhere on Earth.
However this �mechanical Akashic� is also layered with the ill-mindedness and untruths
that pervade this physical realm today.
For this reason, we have to learn to distinguish between knowledge and piles.
Our access to knowledge does not necessarily equate to wisdom (knowledge being the possession
of information, and wisdom being the inclination to be productive with that information.)
So it is up to each of us, not the government or its cohorts, to determine for ourselves
what information is real and relevant, and what is �fake news� or propaganda.
Information vs. the Status Quo The world is on the precipice of change.
The information age has the power to challenge the structures of the status quo.
It even has the potential to eliminate the influence of money over the election of our
leaders, since all candidates can be offered equal communication platforms which enable
them all (and their policies) equally, so that those with the best ideas are elected
and not the wealthiest corporate-funded noisemaker who can buy support and advertising time on
corporate media.
Indeed, there are so many ways that the information age could completely shift the oligarchical
collectivism of the power structures of the world in favor of individuals instead of institutions.
So, instead of expanding our reach of information � instead of inspiring individuals to dig
for truth and research for realness � the institutional powers-that-be are constricting
the field of information.
This is particularly obvious with recent challenges to net neutrality � a neutrality that 87%
of average Americans support, but which institutions are nonetheless seeking to destroy.
This constriction of ideas has expanded to the point that anything esoteric or challenging
to the mainstream media narrative is being covertly and overtly belittled, or outright
censored, while at the same time, militaristic propaganda is put forth through the mainstream
media, who refuse to genuinely analyze or criticize the actions of its government cohort.
A clear example is the distinct absence of any pacifists in the mainstream news media
even questioning our government�s policy of aggressive intervention, as the U.S. government
continues to incite conflict with other nations under the guise of �humanitarianism� and
�peace�.
Moreover, mainstream media has been found repeatedly obscuring and falsifying �news�,
while blacking-out important stories completely � clearly demonstrating it is working to
corporate and government allegiances and agendas.
Just look at the countless global events being reported by the underground news and compare
it to the selective, politically-biased fear-fare of the mainstream; there is little journalistic
integrity on display in the mainstream media, just the regurgitation of B.S.
And lots of it.
As a result, public confidence in mainstream news has steadily declined over recent years
while �alternative media� has risen in its place, filling the void of real news,
views and analyses that go unheard and unexamined in mainstream circles.
(For a deeper examination of the ways institutions lie, please read my article A Tangible Math
Lesson � Four Types of Institutional Lies.)
And therein lies the impetus for institutions to censor the internet.
The role of journalism used to be about holding institutions to transparent accountability.
But today, the major institutions of the world � a network of corporate, government, media
and religious bodies � are withholding truth and information concerning everything from
politics to physics while offering their own biased input, which is often completely bogus
subterfuge designed to maintain control and consensus.
Events and views reported in the mainstream are filtered, distorted and even blatantly
constructed by media corporations that conceal their corporate and political alliances behind
the guise of �news� and �journalism�.
Why else do you think facts are being labelled as �alternative� or �fake news�, governments
are attempting to censor and de-neutralize the internet, and the mainstream media fails
to report on major world events while circulating others on endless repeat?
(See: Mainstream Media Propaganda � �Extremely Dangerous to Our Democracy�.)
Undoubtedly, such selectivity of the news and information made available to the general
population proves an institutional agenda that pivots upon the limitation and suppression
of information � and that can only equal bad news for a supposedly free society.
�The mass media serve as a system for communicating messages and symbols to the general populace.
It is their function to amuse, entertain, and inform, and to inculcate individuals with
the values, beliefs, and codes of behavior that will integrate them into the institutional
structures of the larger society.
In a world of concentrated wealth and major conflicts of class interest, to fulfill this
role requires systematic propaganda.�~Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass
Media by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky
Truth-Seeking: A Revolutionary Act Corrupted institutions, to one extent or another,
enslave individuals to those institutions.
Government institutions corrupt law and legality.
Religious institutions corrupt spirituality.
Corporate institutions corrupt trade.
Media institutions corrupt thinking.
Financial institutions have corrupted our economy.
Today, such institutional corruption is so rampant that it has become the unspoken normalcy,
and speaking up to it is quietly viewed as disruption, dissent, and even illness.
Our institutions are designed to limit our access to knowledge and therefore, our thinking,
and promote zealotry and elitism as the new political ideal � and as a result, many
in our society are unable to comprehend the difference between legal and moral much less
why the two have diverged.
So what�s the solution?
Open information.
Open information liberates individuals.
The reason the words library and liberty have the same etymological root is because of the
freeing and empowering nature of information.
So, no matter which individual or institution is presenting information, it is the responsibility
of us all to interpret, consider and research the truth of everything � from politics
to physics.
In our society, some choose to understand while some choose to stand over others.
This is done through controlling information initially, and then controlling resources.
Once information and resources are controlled, authorizing further actions that solidify
the institutional status quo is easy.
The institutions of the world are working together to ensure that they remain the holders
of power and prosperity, for it is through institutions that individuals gain a foothold
to stand over others.
As history has shown us, empire serves no-one but itself.
So, to ensure our liberty we must also ensure the integrity of our library.
The information age not only invites but requires that we expand our consciousness and our comprehension,
not limit it.
We do not need to funnel the pool of information into the narrow mainstream, we need to expand
our minds and increase the numbers of sources of information.
We don�t need corrupted governments or wealthy media corporations telling us what is true
or important; the more information we have access to the more easily we can spot the
information with bias and information that is untrue.
The First Amendment is designed to prevent the institutional, monothematic takeover of
the media, and preserve and inspire our right to consider for ourselves what is truth.
It is a fundamental tenet of the U.S.A. (and the free world) that �Congress shall make
no law� abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.� If we limit our sources
of information, we limit the potential of our thinking and eventually, we may just have
one modality of information, or even just one book to draw information from.
In the age of information, do you want access to an infinite source of information, or just
one source of information?
The choice is obvious.
�In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.� � George
Orwell
-------------------------------------------
Ya sabemos dónde será la luna de miel de Meghan y Harry (y te contamos los detalles) - Duration: 3:27.-------------------------------------------
El pasado como actriz de Amaia Romero que sus fans no conocían - Duration: 4:42.-------------------------------------------
The College Scam - Duration: 6:00.These days all Americans are told
go to college!
A higher education is the
single best investment.
But a new book, The Case Against Education
says this college push
is a big mistake.
How many thousands of hours
did you spend in classes studying
subjects that you never thought about again?
Economist Bryan Caplan says
most people who go to college shouldn't.
I learned little in college.
I liked my friends and illegal drinking,
but I slept through lectures.
At least tuition then was $2,000,
now it's almost $50,000.
People usually just want to talk
about the tuition, which is a big deal
but there's also all the years that
people spend in school
when they could have been doing something else
if you just take a look at the faces of
the students it's obvious that they're bored
and people are there primarily
in order to get a good job.
Because a diploma is a signaling device
for people with
no more brains than you have but they have
one thing you haven't got,
a diploma!
The con man who was the Wizard of Oz
hinted at the problem years ago.
Doctor of Thinkology.
Why'd you write this book?
The Wizard of Oz already made the argument.
But almost no one seems to believe it.
College graduation has never been more valuable
than it is today.
Education is my top priority
and by supporting this budget
you'll make it yours as well.
Meaning taxpayers must pay for it.
All the politicians say, go to college.
And there is evidence
the higher you go, the more money you make.
It's totally true that when people go
and get more and better and fancier degrees that
their income generally goes up,
but the reason why this happening is not really
that college is pouring tons of job skills into you,
the reason is that it's impressive.
You aren't saying,
you, individual don't go to college,
you're saying
we as a country
are suckers
to push it
and subsidize it.
Exactly.
Just because it is lucrative for an individual
doesn't mean that's a good
idea for country.
Because when most everyone goes to college,
that just raises the bar.
Imagine that you're at a concert
and everyone is sitting down and you
want to see better, what can you do?
Well you can stand up alright, and of course
then you'll see better.
Now it does not follow though
that if everyone stands up
everyone sees better.
You just block each other's views.
The same thing has happened
in education, says Caplan,
as more people got degrees,
more employers insisted on degrees.
The result isn't that graduates
get better jobs,
it's that employers require degrees for
most every job.
There are so many jobs
where it used to be crazy to think that you
would need a college degree,
like to be a waiter in a fancy restaurant
where now it would be very normal.
Of course a college education is about more than
getting a job,
it's also about learning
but Caplan says if students really
wanted to learn, they would just do it.
If you want to go to Princeton,
you don't have to apply,
just move to the town and start attending classes.
Nobody does that.
In people's bones they realize
that what really counts is that diploma.
Today that's a taxpayer subsidized diploma
and when you subsidize something,
you get more of it.
More students apply to college,
so schools raise tuition.
Tuition cost has risen
at triple the rate of inflation.
Schools use that money
to attract more students
and more tax money.
Many compete by advertising luxury.
They promote things like lobster dinners,
fancy pools.
Students will come to us and say,
this is what sealed the deal.
Used to be reading, writing, and
arithmetic,
and well we're now the 4th "r",
recreation.
600 colleges now have rock walls.
Give our Tigers spring break every time
they step in
to the Student Recreation Complex.
This is a public school,
taxpayers fund that spring break.
We also fund years of study in subjects unlikely
to help students get jobs,
like social justice, gender studies, multicultural studies.
If we're doing computer science
or electrical engineering,
then you probably
are actually learning a bunch of useful skills,
but every year we graduate about
twice as many psychology bachelor's degrees
as we do engineering bachelor's degrees.
Of course there's value in learning psychology,
philosophy,
literature,
many employers say they want liberal arts graduates.
It's technology married with liberal arts,
married with the humanities,
that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.
It makes us better, wiser people.
But you can't assume that works.
How many years of people's lives should
they be made to study stuff
when the odds that they'll ever appreciate it are
1 in a 100, 1 in a 1000?
Maybe it makes our brains work better?
It's the kind of thing
you'd expect teachers say,
but there's a whole field of people who have
actually studied this.
Much as they want to believe that you're right
they generally come away
after looking at a lot of evidence and saying,
wow actually
it's wishful thinking.
Although Caplan calls college a scam,
he says it's great
for a few people.
People like him.
I'm a tenured professor. Your audience may not
realize how good of a gig this is,
but a tenured professor cannot be fired
for almost any reason
and you get a nice income
and there almost no demands upon your time.
You just have to teach five hours a week?
Well there's people who consider that
a horrible burden.
That's a scam that we're paying so much money for
people like you to teach you five hours.
Yeah well, I'm a whistleblower.
The bottom line of The Case Against Education:
taxpayers ought to know
that they're getting ripped off.
Government has made a tremendous effort
to make education
accessible to everyone.
I say really what we need to do
is to go back to a world
where college is not so accessible,
where it really distinguishes you,
and in this way,
people are going to be able to
start their lives years earlier.
The wisest solution all things considered
would be if government just got out.
It would be good if government
got out of a lot of things.
-------------------------------------------
Kate le rinde tributo a Lady Di cada vez que se viste para un evento público. Un real desafío - Duration: 3:29.-------------------------------------------
La biométrie : Faciliter les déplacements des voyages sans compromettre la sécurité du Canada - Duration: 2:38.-------------------------------------------
Cómo borrar el historial, la caché y las cookies en el iPhone o iPad — Soporte técnico de Apple - Duration: 1:49.-------------------------------------------
Funny And Lucky Moments - Hearthstone - Ep. 368 - Duration: 5:22.-------------------------------------------
Reese Witherspoon Encourages #ReadingIsLIT | HBO x NYPL - Duration: 0:50.Hi everybody! Reese Witherspoon here.
Some of my favorite projects have been inspired by...
(READS PROMPT)
That's why I'm thrilled to announce that...
...are joining together to celebrate storytelling
with their new campaign called...
HBO and The New York Public Library
are kicking off the summer reading season
by calling out some of your favorite
book-inspired series, like...
...and, of course...
There are some many incredible worlds out there
to explore and...
So, head to...
...to check out more.
♪ (UPBEAT MUSIC PLAYS) ♪
-------------------------------------------
The Most Valuable Airspace in the World - Duration: 10:48.This video was made possible by Brilliant.
Start learning with Brilliant for 20% off by being one of the first 200 people to sign
up at Brilliant.org/Wendover.
This is East Asia—comprised of China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan—and this is Europe.
2.4 billion people live in these two areas—a third of the world's population.
More impressively, each of these two regions have a GDP of about $20 trillion.
Combined, just these countries account for half of the world's economic activity.
They are two of the world's most dense, most developed, and m ost economically interlinked
regions and are home to the world's largest and most influential cities yet laying between
them is just one country—Russia.
This more of less means that one country controls whether Europe can get to Asia and vice versa
and for a while, they couldn't.
During the cold war, almost universally, non-soviet airlines were not allowed to fly over the
Soviet Union.
This proved a huge barrier to travel.
In the 1950's, flying on BOAC, which later became British Airways, the fastest route
from London to Tokyo involved leaving London at 10am on Friday and stopping in Rome, Beirut,
Bahrain, Karachi, Calcutta, Yangon, Bangkok, and Manila before finally arriving in Tokyo
at 6am on a Sunday.
All in all, that was 36 hours and 10,000 miles of travel to get between two cities 6,000
miles apart and that was also their fastest service on the Comet jet plane.
Their slower and cheaper propeller plane service would leave London on a Sunday and not arrive
in Tokyo until Thursday after 88 hours of travel.
It was just hugely inefficient but there was a better way—over the Arctic.
SAS was the first to develop routes overflying the Arctic but other airlines soon followed.
These routes were first used to get to the American west coast faster.
This involved developing new navigation systems to overcome the issue of traditional magnetic
compasses not working properly in the high north.
In the 1950's no commercial airplane had the range to fly to the American west coast
non-stop but with SAS's new polar route they would take a relatively quick route from
Copenhagen stopping in Kangerlussuaq, Greenland and Winnipeg, Canada before arriving in Los
Angeles.
This cut what was previously a 36 hour trip down to 22.
With SAS having proven that commercial flights over the Arctic were both safe and commercially
viable, other airlines quickly followed not only setting up routes to the American west
coast but also to the far east.
The most direct route from London to Tokyo flies over Siberia, but since that airspace
was closed airlines chose another way—the other way around the world.
In 1960, only 40,000 people lived in Anchorage, Alaska and Alaska had just became a state
the year before, but its airport emerged as a crucial stopping point between Europe and
Asia.
BOAC's thrice weekly polar route from London to Tokyo would leave Heathrow at 1:45 pm,
arrive in Anchorage nine and a half hours later, stop for an hour to refuel, and then
fly the remaining seven hours to Tokyo.
All in all, it was timetabled to take only seventeen and a half hours—half of what
the trip took before.
It was as drastic a reduction in travel time as when Concorde cut New York to London flights
from six hours to three.
BOAC wasn't the only one.
All the major European carriers set up routes to the far east via Anchorage in the 1960s
and 1970s.
While Anchorage sees only a few dozen daily commercial flights mostly to the continental
US today, in the 1970s it was served by Air France, SAS, KLM, Iberia, Lufthansa, Japan
Airlines, Korean Air, and more.
This tiny town in Alaska quickly became one of the most connected and cosmopolitan areas
of the world with passengers and flight crews from all around the world stopping over all
because of where it was.
As aircraft became more advanced with longer range, there were a few airlines that managed
to avoid stopping in Anchorage on their way from Europe to East Asia.
Finnair, for example, starting flying from Helsinki to Tokyo non-stop in 1983 by flying
in international airspace north of Russia over the North Pole.
This made what is today a nine hour flight thirteen hours but it was still faster than
stopping in Anchorage.
Overwhelmingly, though, airlines continued to fly through Anchorage.
Eventually, though, the Soviet Union did of course fall in 1991 and with that Russia started
to grant overflight rights to European and East Asian airlines.
They first had to modernize and anglicize their air traffic control system.
All international pilots and air traffic controllers worldwide speak English but before, since
there were few international flights over Russia, the Russian air traffic controllers
didn't speak english.
Once the changes were made, airlines quickly switched to flying non-stop from Europe to
Asia over Siberia.
That left Anchorage largely deserted.
The airport built a large and modern international terminal in 1982 to handle all the traffic
passing through the airport but then, less than ten years later, all those airlines that
kept the airport busy left in droves.
Today, that international terminal, built to handle hundreds of flights per month, only
sees a flight every few days.
Russia, meanwhile, is prospering thanks to the opening up of its airspace.
Flying to Asia over Siberia saves airlines huge amounts of time and money so Russia therefore
charges airlines huge amounts of money to do so.
Exact numbers vary by airline and are kept secret, but for each roundtrip flight between
Europe and Asia, Siberian overflight fees are believed to account for up to $100 of
a single passenger's ticket price.
Russia has an enormous amount of power by controlling this airspace and they use it
to their advantage.
133 countries have signed the International Civil Aviation Organization's Transit Agreement
which essentially allows any airline from any country to fly through the signatory's
airspace but Russia, however, has not, so they can pick and choose which country's
airlines get to fly through their airspace.
The country can and has used its airspace as a geopolitical weapon—in 2014 they threatened
to shut down their airspace to European Union airlines in response to sanctions, in 2017
they threatened to close the airspace to Dutch airlines in response to a reduction in landing
slots for a Russian airline at Schiphol airport, and in April 2018 they tacitly threatened
to close their airspace to US airlines in response to US military action in Syria.
But Russia not only decides which countries can fly in its airspace, it also decides which
specific airlines.
There is more or less a rule that only one airline per European country can overfly Russia.
There are certainly exceptions—both British Airways and Virgin Atlantic are London based,
for example, but both overfly Siberia on their routes to Shanghai and Hong Kong, but Air
France is the only French airline with Siberian overflight rights, Lufthansa is the only German
airline with overflight rights, Iberia is the only Spanish airline with overflight rights,
and so on and so forth.
For the longest while, this wasn't a problem.
European countries aren't that big and few had more than one intercontinental airline
but nowadays, however, that's changing.
We're seeing more and more budget airlines competing with the large, established carriers
on long-haul routes but, with this system of overflight permissions, the legacy carriers
more or less have a monopoly on east Asian routes.
SAS, for example, operates out of Norway, Denmark, and Sweden and they have Siberian
overflight rights that take them to destinations like Tokyo, Beijing, and Shanghai.
SAS is therefore the only Scandinavian airline allowed to overfly Siberia.
But also in Scandinavia is Norwegian Air.
As one of the largest low-cost airlines in the world, Norwegian has pioneered long-haul
budget flying mainly focusing on flights from major European cities to the US.
The airline has said, though, that it wants to expand eastwards.
They already have flights from Copenhagen, Oslo, and Stockholm to Bangkok and from London
to Singapore, but these destinations are far enough south that they don't involve flying
over Siberia.
The airline has repeatedly applied for Siberian overflight rights and repeatedly been denied.
They argue that SAS does not operate any flight from Norway to Asia so they should be granted
permission as the only Norwegian airline but, since SAS is partially registered in Norway,
Russia isn't granting permission.
Norwegian does have a subsidiary legally registered in the UK but its unlikely that Russia would
grant overflight rights to this since British Airways and Virgin Atlantic also have overflight
rights.
Norwegian airlines also has a subsidiary based in Ireland which does not have an airline
with Siberian overflight rights but, SAS also has a subsidiary based in the country which
could mean that Russia will deny rights to this subsidiary too.
As of now, Russia has not granted overflight permission to any budget airline.
Others have tried—Icelandic airlines Wow Air and Icelandair have attempted to negotiate
overflight rights—but Russia views overflights as a way to make money and wants to charge
fees that would make it impossible for a low-cost airline.
For now, Wow Air has planned to start flights from Reykjavik to Delhi, India which, in a
direct routing would fly over Russia but can route around Russia by only adding 45 minutes
in extra flight time if an arrangement isn't made before flights start in December 2018.
Russia is a powerful politically-savvy country that knows that these overflight rights are
a huge negotiation tool.
Pulling the rights of a country's airline would be a huge financial blow and granting
rights is also a huge advantage.
Competition, though, is good for the consumer and this current system stifles it.
Until Russia starts granting overflight rights to budget airlines, nonstop flights to Asia
will stay expensive.
The fact that this shortcut over Siberia is now open at all, however, saves millions of
passengers yearly enormous amounts of time and money.
Watching this ten-minute video of our technological progress might make you think that we got
here in one giant leap, but that, of course, is not the case.
We had to develop new navigation systems to work around old-school compasses, build airports
to help planes refuel, and extend the range of aircraft.
The problem of advancing enough to be able to fly non-stop to the other side of the world
was huge but it was broken down and approached in small steps.
Brilliant works in a similar way—breaking a problem down, identifying the relevant concepts,
thinking clearly through each part, and building it back up to the conclusion.
In this manner, super complex topics like number theory or calculus can be easily understood
by anyone.
My favorite from Brilliant is their logic course, which starts simple, but then builds
up your skills so you can solve seemingly impossible problems.
To support Wendover Productions and learn more about Brilliant, go to brilliant.org/wendover
and sign up for free.
And also, the first 200 people that go to that link will get 20% off the annual Premium
subscription.
Thanks for watching and we'll see you again in three weeks for another Wendover Productions
video.
-------------------------------------------
10 Умных финансовых привычек на 1000000 – Денежные привычки, которые помогут заработать больше денег - Duration: 4:11.-------------------------------------------
EVE Online - Into the Abyss Feature Tour - Duration: 1:29.-------------------------------------------
Stossel: The College Scam - Duration: 5:49.These days all Americans are told
go to college!
A higher education is the
single best investment.
But a new book, The Case Against Education
says this college push
is a big mistake.
How many thousands of hours
did you spend in classes studying
subjects that you never thought about again?
Economist Bryan Caplan says
most people who go to college shouldn't.
I learned little in college.
I liked my friends and illegal drinking,
but I slept through lectures.
At least tuition then was $2,000,
now it's almost $50,000.
People usually just want to talk
about the tuition, which is a big deal
but there's also all the years that
people spend in school
when they could have been doing something else
if you just take a look at the faces of
the students it's obvious that they're bored
and people are there primarily
in order to get a good job.
Because a diploma is a signaling device
for people with
no more brains than you have but they have
one thing you haven't got,
a diploma!
The con man who was the Wizard of Oz
hinted at the problem years ago.
Doctor of Thinkology.
Why'd you write this book?
The Wizard of Oz already made the argument.
But almost no one seems to believe it.
College graduation has never been more valuable
than it is today.
Education is my top priority
and by supporting this budget
you'll make it yours as well.
Meaning taxpayers must pay for it.
All the politicians say, go to college.
And there is evidence
the higher you go, the more money you make.
It's totally true that when people go
and get more and better and fancier degrees that
their income generally goes up,
but the reason why this happening is not really
that college is pouring tons of job skills into you,
the reason is that it's impressive.
You aren't saying,
you, individual don't go to college,
you're saying
we as a country
are suckers
to push it
and subsidize it.
Exactly.
Just because it is lucrative for an individual
doesn't mean that's a good
idea for country.
Because when most everyone goes to college,
that just raises the bar.
Imagine that you're at a concert
and everyone is sitting down and you
want to see better, what can you do?
Well you can stand up alright, and of course
then you'll see better.
Now it does not follow though
that if everyone stands up
everyone sees better.
You just block each other's views.
The same thing has happened
in education, says Caplan,
as more people got degrees,
more employers insisted on degrees.
The result isn't that graduates
get better jobs,
it's that employers require degrees for
most every job.
There are so many jobs
where it used to be crazy to think that you
would need a college degree,
like to be a waiter in a fancy restaurant
where now it would be very normal.
Of course a college education is about more than
getting a job,
it's also about learning
but Caplan says if students really
wanted to learn, they would just do it.
If you want to go to Princeton,
you don't have to apply,
just move to the town and start attending classes.
Nobody does that.
In people's bones they realize
that what really counts is that diploma.
Today that's a taxpayer subsidized diploma
and when you subsidize something,
you get more of it.
More students apply to college,
so schools raise tuition.
Tuition cost has risen
at triple the rate of inflation.
Schools use that money
to attract more students
and more tax money.
Many compete by advertising luxury.
They promote things like lobster dinners,
fancy pools.
Students will come to us and say,
this is what sealed the deal.
Used to be reading, writing, and
arithmetic,
and well we're now the 4th "r",
recreation.
600 colleges now have rock walls.
Give our Tigers spring break every time
they step in
to the Student Recreation Complex.
This is a public school,
taxpayers fund that spring break.
We also fund years of study in subjects unlikely
to help students get jobs,
like social justice, gender studies, multicultural studies.
If we're doing computer science
or electrical engineering,
then you probably
are actually learning a bunch of useful skills,
but every year we graduate about
twice as many psychology bachelor's degrees
as we do engineering bachelor's degrees.
Of course there's value in learning psychology,
philosophy,
literature,
many employers say they want liberal arts graduates.
It's technology married with liberal arts,
married with the humanities,
that yields us the result that makes our hearts sing.
It makes us better, wiser people.
But you can't assume that works.
How many years of people's lives should
they be made to study stuff
when the odds that they'll ever appreciate it are
1 in a 100, 1 in a 1000?
Maybe it makes our brains work better?
It's the kind of thing
you'd expect teachers say,
but there's a whole field of people who have
actually studied this.
Much as they want to believe that you're right
they generally come away
after looking at a lot of evidence and saying,
wow actually
it's wishful thinking.
Although Caplan calls college a scam,
he says it's great
for a few people.
People like him.
I'm a tenured professor. Your audience may not
realize how good of a gig this is,
but a tenured professor cannot be fired
for almost any reason
and you get a nice income
and there almost no demands upon your time.
You just have to teach five hours a week?
Well there's people who consider that
a horrible burden.
That's a scam that we're paying so much money for
people like you to teach you five hours.
Yeah well, I'm a whistleblower.
The bottom line of The Case Against Education:
taxpayers ought to know
that they're getting ripped off.
Government has made a tremendous effort
to make education
accessible to everyone.
I say really what we need to do
is to go back to a world
where college is not so accessible,
where it really distinguishes you,
and in this way,
people are going to be able to
start their lives years earlier.
The wisest solution all things considered
would be if government just got out.
It would be good if government
got out of a lot of things.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét