Waching daily Sep 25 2017

Drunk guy: What is capacity of engine?

600

Drunk guy: 600 only?

Back off buddy.

I'll hit you!

Drunk guy: atomik exhaust..(?)

Blah blah...

Drunk guy: Are you recording?

Back off, back off...

Girl: C'mon..

Girl: C'mon..

Drunk guy: Bring it on!

Check out my exhaust. Look in this hole. It'll be great.

What?!

She basically told me that "I am bothering her on the road, my motorbike is useless and I should take a bicycle instead", while I kept on telling her that the speed limit is 30 here and inquired whether she is familiar with the number 30.

For more infomation >> Stupid, Crazy & Angry People vs Bikers 2017 - Duration: 10:17.

-------------------------------------------

Movies That Angered Their Real-Life Characters - Duration: 10:03.

Having a movie made about your life might seem like a modern dream, but for those who've

watched their stories play on the big screen, it can sometimes be a nightmare.

For these real life people who were depicted in movies, the experience of becoming film

famous was not all it was cracked up to be.

Here's why.

Moneyball

If you're unfamiliar with the story of Moneyball, it's a retelling of how Oakland Athletics

general manager Billy Beane reshaped the way professional baseball scouts and front offices

put together a competitive roster.

The movie was critically acclaimed, but Oakland's real-life manager Art Howe was not pleased

with what he saw.

Howe was portrayed in the movie by Philip Seymour Hoffman, and while Hoffman may have

been an Oscar-winning prestige actor, Howe thought he was too hefty to play him.

But that was the smallest of his concerns with the depiction.

Howe also took issue with the fact that he was represented as little more than an old

school baseball dinosaur who was being lapped by brilliant minds like Beane.

He even called the movie "character assassination," saying,

"People who don't know me are going to think that's how I was.

You work to build a reputation and then in two hours this movie breaks it down."

He was also less than impressed with the movie's attention to players' on-base percentages

because, in his words, that was a "duh" moment.

"no seriously."

The Blind Side

For Baltimore Ravens' offensive lineman Michael Oher, all the buzz that followed his portrayal

in The Blind Side was a bit infuriating.

While it was true that the Tuohys took him in and have since become his family, the movie

made it seem as though he was a gentle giant with protective instincts whom Sandra Bullock

guided into getting good at football.

But in real life he'd been playing football for years before he was brought into the Tuohy

crew.

As he told NPR,

"...I could not figure out why the director chose to show me as someone who had to be

taught the game of football.

Whether it was S.J. moving around ketchup bottles or Leigh Anne explaining to me what

blocking is about, I watched those scenes thinking, 'No, that's not me at all!

I've been studying — really studying — the game since I was a kid!'

That was my main hang-up with the film."

"Well alright then."

Straight Outta Compton

Dr. Dre, Eazy E, and Ice Cube might've been the best-known rappers from the groundbreaking

group N.W.A, but there were two others in the group who got less favorable coverage

in the cinematic version of their story, Straight Outta Compton.

DJ Yella and MC Ren didn't become as famous as their peers, so they weren't as prevalent

in the movie.

For DJ Yella, it wasn't a big deal.

He told XXL Magazine that he was glad they took a few liberties with his history because

it added some levity, saying,

"It needed a little extra, a little more excitement to the movie and stuff … so it wouldn't

be so tense, so serious all the time."

For MC Ren, however, he didn't appreciate the fact that the film characterized him as

a glorified extra.

MC Ren said that he felt disrespected by the movie because it failed to show his contributions

to their song list, writing on social media, "True fans know my role in the group as far

a lyrics are concerned, don't let the movie fool you about my contribution to the group."

Even so, he still gave props to the pic for successfully telling the story of N.W.A … even

if he wasn't in it as much as he might've liked.

Pain and Gain

This Michael Bay crime comedy about a trio of bodybuilders who end up kidnapping a guy

might not have been the most prestigious movie to ever hit the marquee.

But for the real-life man who was victimized by the incident, it had a major impact on

his life.

In the movie, the kidnapping victim was played by Tony Shaloub as an unrelentingly terrible

person, who audiences probably didn't feel too badly about seeing brutalized by the trio

of baddies.

"Victor Kershaw is a criminal p---k who deserves bad stuff to happen to him."

In reality, though, the victim was a man named Marc Schiller, who later filed a lawsuit against

Paramount Pictures for the way he, and the crime, were portrayed.

At the time of his kidnapping, Schiller owned an accountancy firm and a deli and had broken

off a deal with a friend who later made a plan to extort him.

According to Schilling, the movie falsely portrayed him as "a deplorable, unlikable,

sleazy, rude, abrasive, womanizing braggart" and claimed the movie ruined his life.

Considering he'd already been kidnapped, tortured, and extorted by his real-life assailants,

the fact that the movie victimized him once more was salt on the wound.

Paramount later settled with Schiller for "an undisclosed amount," and Schiller committed

his version of the story to paperback.

All Eyez on Me

This bio-pic of Tupac Shakur was a critical miss for several reasons, not the least of

which was how the movie recreated Jada Pinkett Smith's involvement in his life story.

The actress skewered the film on Twitter and accused the filmmakers of fabricating a scene

wherein Shakur read her a poem and claimed they completely invented a farewell between

the two.

She also denied the occurrence of an argument portrayed in the film,

calling the movie's version of events "deeply hurtful."

Sully

It's a scientific fact that everybody loves Tom Hanks, and the man he portrays in 2016's

Sully is a bona fide hero.

Capt. Chesley Sullenberger III was the pilot who pulled off the Miracle on the Hudson,

so named because it was one of the most insane emergency landings ever attempted and saved

every person on board the plane.

But if the film's plot had been true to the actual events, it would have been over in

half an hour because all that time spent investigating whether or not he'd done right thing was greatly

exaggerated.

There was never any significant doubt as to whether Sully made the right call.

The first set of simulations, shown in the film to constitute damning evidence that the

emergency landing was unnecessary, showed just the opposite.

And the final report praised both Sully and the crew for their heroism.

The real investigators were none too happy about this, accusing director Clint Eastwood

of making manufactured villains out of them for the sake of dramatic tension.

Now-retired lead investigator Robert Benzon complained that the film had hurt his reputation,

while putting its level of realism "somewhere between Sharknado 2 and Sharknado 3."

Winnie

Nelson Mandela is widely regarded as one of the greatest men of the 20th century.

And his wife is extraordinary in her own right.

From her social justice efforts to her positions of power in South Africa, her life's work

is definitely worth talking about.

However, she didn't want her life story to be told on-screen.

And when Winnie came along, with Oscar-winner Jennifer Hudson portraying her, she took umbrage

to its development and tried to stop the movie in its tracks.

Mandela had originally asked to simply see the script before the film went into production,

but for some bizarre reason, the studio refused.

So, in the end, Mandela probably didn't mind it much that the movie never landed with critics.

The Experiment

This 2001 film was based on the infamous Stanford prison experiment, which had participants

play the roles of prisoners and guards in an attempt to shed light on the psychological

effects of power over others.

The results were not pretty, as the "guards" wasted no time in lording their authority

over the "prisoners," subjecting some of them to psychological abuse and humiliating punishments

like cleaning toilets and peeing in buckets.

The man running the experiment, psychologist Philip Zimbardo, allowed this to continue

for six days before calling it off at the insistence of his girlfriend.

The test pushed the boundaries of ethics—but never did devolve into brutal violence and

rapes, as depicted in the film.

Zimbardo, president of the American Psychological Association at the time of the film's release,

was not happy.

He said, "It makes Stanford and me and psychology look bad."

To be fair, the film does only claim to have been inspired by real events, but most filmgoers

probably can't tell the difference.

Patch Adams

This 1998 dramedy about Dr. Hunter "Patch" Adams gave new life to the story of the dedicated

doctor who merged the worlds of medicine and clowning.

Although reviewers weren't very impressed with the flick, the harshest criticism came

from Patch Adams himself.

In an interview, the doctor disparaged the film for allegedly making his children weep

with displeasure.

He felt it created a hollow caricature of him while stepping around all the grueling

effort he put into actually helping people.

"All right.

Wow.

Yes."

When discussing the film's real-world impact, Adams pulled no punches, saying, "We put up

fake, meaningless heroes to completely divert intelligence from our population.

So, our kind of work, if anything, is denigrated."

He went on to lament that the film did nothing to bolster his real-life efforts to heal the

sick.

Apparently, depicting Adams as a doctor who put enema bulbs on his face didn't leave a

positive impression.

Spotlight

In an age where news outlets consistently get accused of alleged bias and fakery, Spotlight

provides a noble portrait of journalistic courage and integrity.

The Oscar-winning movie revisited how the Boston Globe exposed heinous sexual abuse

and a dastardly cover-up by the Catholic Church.

So, a picture this serious might seem to demand a standard of truth-seeking worthy of the

journalists it represents.

However, one of real-life people depicted in the movie was more than mildly offended

as to how he came off in the pic.

School representative Jack Dunn was painted as a morally ambiguous figure who tried to

excuse away abuses.

"It's a big school, Robbie, you know that.

And we're talking about seven, alleged victims over, what, eight years?"

The real Dunn subsequently sued the studio for defamation, and ultimately, the filmmakers

apologized to him and settled for an undisclosed sum.

The Wolf of Wall Street

Although there were also penny stocks and tax evasion in the mix, The Wolf of Wall Street

is really just about a couple of white collar hustlers that bathe in cash and drugs.

Based on the duplicitous rise of corporate conman Jordan Belfort, the movie takes viewers

on an intoxicating odyssey of unabashed decadence, but not everyone appreciated the picture.

According to Andrew Greene, the picture is nothing short of cinematic slander.

His portrayal in the film was a blip on the movie's radar, but in Greene's mind, The Wolf

of Wall Street unfairly picked on him, depicting him as a dope-swilling degenerate who arranged

illegal transactions for Belfort.

"See, I told you he was fantastic right?"

Moreover, his alleged onscreen equivalent, Nicky "Rugrat" Koskoff wears a toupee and

acts like a cartoon.

Greene took those indignities as a huge affront and sued for millions of dollars.

And when the studio tried to have the case thrown out, they failed, and a New York judge

even ordered Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese to testify about the film.

If he does win the suit, it'll give all new meaning to that scene with Leonardo Dicaprio

throwing his cash into the ocean, won't it?

"Holy f--- you did just say that."

Thanks for watching!

Click the Grunge icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> Movies That Angered Their Real-Life Characters - Duration: 10:03.

-------------------------------------------

Game of Thrones Season 8 E04 Complete Plot Revealed - Duration: 6:29.

The fourth episode begins in King's Landing, where Cersei speaks with Qyburn, Euron and

Commanders of the Golden Company.

Qyburn informs them that Daenerys and Jon have split up their army and that Jaime is

currently with Jon and Edmure in Riverrun, probably awaiting an attack from the Night

King.

Daenerys has gone back to Dragonstone.

Pyke has been taken back by Theon Greyjoy, which angers Euron.

Cersei laughs and says that she hopes Night King devours their army soon enough.

She says that they shouldn't wait too long and have the Golden Company attack Dragonstone

since Daenerys's army is reduced remarkably.

In another scene, Euron Greyjoy is watching the Iron Throne when Cersei joins him in the

Throne Room.

She asks Euron that why he doesn't attack Pyke, since his nephew has taken it from him.

Cersei convinces him to teach Theon another lesson.

Euron decides to go to Pyke with his fleet.

In the next scene, Cersei and Qyburn watch from castle as Euron leaves.

Qyburn asks Cersei if it is smart to have their most important ally travel so far North

at the moment.

Cersei tells Qyburn that she hopes her enemies deal with Euron Greyjoy and that he never

returns to King's Landing.

In the next shot, Daenerys, Sam, Gilly, Varys and Missandei return to Dragonstone.

Varys reports to Daenerys that Euron's ships has been seen leaving King's Landing.

And it is only a matter of time now that Cersei orders the Golden Company to attack Dragonstone.

When Daenerys takes a bath, Missandei remarks that she's visibly pregnant now.

Daenerys asks Missandei that how is she dealing with Grey Worm's death.

Missandei responds that she misses him every day.

Missandei asks Daenerys whether she misses Jon.

Daenerys says she does.

Next scene is Samwell with Gilly and Little Sam.

Samwell wants Gilly to travel to Horn Hill with Little Sam because they aren't safe

in Dragonstone with enemies from all sides.

Gilly reminds Sam that he promised her not to leave them, but Sam insists that they must

go, for they'll be safe with his mother and sister.

He promises that he'll fight for them.

In Riverrun, Jon gets news that the Army of the Dead has been seen reaching the Twins.

He shares the news with others and says that the Dead will be upon them soon.

He suggests taking their armies to the Eyrie immediately.

Tyrion takes the time to ask Jaime about Cersei and why he chose to leave her.

Jaime tells Tyrion that Cersei will never find peace after the deaths of their children.

He says that she lied to everybody at the Dragonpit and betrayed them by hiring the

Golden Company.

Their relationship fully consumed him.

Tyrion reminds the rest that Daenerys isn't safe in Dragonstone, now that Cersei has an

army of thousands of sellswords behind her back.

She could attack Dragonstone any moment now.

Jorah thinks his place is with his queen as he promised to protect her at any cost.

Jon agrees and lets him go.

Jon sends word to Sansa that the Army of the Dead will reach the Vale soon and that they

too are marching to the Vale now.

In King's Landing, Cersei stands with the commanders of the Golden Company on the giant

map of Westeros.

She instructs the commanders to take their men to Dragonstone with Euron's remaining

ships and to capture Daenerys Targaryen alive.

She can't wait to kill the foreign whore herself.

The Golden Company leaves for the Dragonstone.

Sansa receives word from Jon and asks the Lords of the Vale to prepare for war.

She convinces Robin Arryn to have Lord Royce lead the Knights of the Vale.

Robin tells Sansa he intends to fight with them.

Sansa answers Robin that it's not a good idea and that he should be kept safe.

Robin laughs and tells Sansa that he's not a girl, unlike Sansa.

Gendry and Sansa have a conversation as Well.

Sansa asks how Gendry and Arya met, but he tells Sansa that the story is too long to

tell.

The two seem to get along well and Sansa thanks him for fighting with them.

In Dragonstone, Missandei receives a visitor.

She first asks for Jon Snow, but is happy to meet Daenerys as well.

It seems to be old Melisandre who comes to bring them important news.

Old Melisandre tells them that a great last sacrifice should be made if they want to win

the war and that it requires true king's blood.

Old Melisandre points at Daenerys's baby.

Daenerys is furious at the old lady and sends her away immediately.

Before Old Melisandre leaves, Varys talks with her outside.

Melisandre makes her identity known, which has Varys shocked.

She tells Varys that he should remember what the voice in the flames said to him.

He should be the one to save the common people from the doom.

She asks Varys to fulfill the prophecy and save Westeros.

Varys doesn't say a word.

Melisandre leaves Dragonstone.

In Pyke, Theon Greyjoy is sitting on his father's chair when his men come to tell him that Euron

Greyjoy has arrived here.

Euron speaks with Theon outside.

He has Yara with him and tells Theon that he should give up Pyke already or he'll

slit his sister's throat in front of him.

This is when Theon notices that its getting colder and that he can see his breath.

He tells Euron that "they" are coming for them, but Euron doesn't understand.

Men start to scream and Wights start invading Pyke.

Yara takes advantage of the moment and kicks Euron.

Theon implores Yara to escape to Dragonstone.

Yara wants Theon to come with her, but he tells her that he won't fail her again.

She escapes on a small ship with a few loyal men.

Theon fights Euron himself.

Ironborn fight the wights, while Euron battles Theon.

Euron gets the upper-hand and swings his axe right into Theon's body.

Theon dies immediately.

Euron laughs.

He asks his men to leave Pyke.

A lot of his men die, but Euron manages to escape and the episode ends.

To receive leaks of the next season 8 episodes in your newsfeed, hit the SUBSCRIBE button

below.

For more infomation >> Game of Thrones Season 8 E04 Complete Plot Revealed - Duration: 6:29.

-------------------------------------------

Gran Turismo Sport - Es werde Licht | HDR auf der Rennstrecke - Duration: 1:02.

For more infomation >> Gran Turismo Sport - Es werde Licht | HDR auf der Rennstrecke - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

[Présentation] Hi-Capa 5.1 Tokyo Marui - Duration: 9:19.

Airsoft Entrepot TV - Hi-Capa 5.1 Tokyo Marui

Hello everyone and welcome to this new video !

Today we'll show you the very famous Hi-Capa 5.1 Tokyo Marui (stainless version)

The gun is shipped inside a good looking cardboard box

Inside, you'll find several booklets (Tokyo Marui japanese booklets, some safety warnings, a few targets...)

You'll find a generic booklet as well

Inside, you'll find the gun, its gas magazine, a cleaning rod and a metal stick (we'll see the point of this stick later)

There is also a rail and 2 screws, a few bbs and 2 parts you can put inside the magazine in order to dry fire the gun

The stainless version has 2 colors, the upper part looks like stainless steel (but is made of plastic)

The grip is made of plastic as well

Note how the grip texture is different on the sides and on the front and the back

The sights are made of metal

The rear sight is adjustable (windage and elevation)

The hammer is made of metal

There is 2 safeties

There is an ambidextrous one on the sides (that you can put only when the hammer is armed)

The 2nd one is the grip safety (if you don't press it, the trigger won't work)

The slide stop is functionnal and is on the left side of the gun, the mag release button is here as well

The trigger and the trigger guard are made of plastic

The gun has nicely made markings (which aren't realistic though)

Its weight is 540 gr (without magazine), and its size is 22,5x13,5 cm

You can't put a silencer since there is no thread

The magazine is made of metal and holds 31 bbs

Only the magazine floorplate and the lips are made of plastic ; its weight is 310 gr

Chrony test using 144a Abbey and 0.20 ATM bbs

Outdoor shooting test using 144a gas, 0.28 gr ATM bbs (temperature 22°C)

Don't forget that disassembling a gun might void the warranty of your gun !

Don't hesitate to contact us before if you need any information

To remove the slide, remove first the magazine

Pull the slide to the right position and remove the slide stop

Then, remove the slide

Note the hop up adjustment wheel

Inside the slide, pull the spring guide plug and remove the whole spring guide assembly

You can now remove the barrel assembly from the slide

You can use a flat screwdriver in order to help you removing the hop up unit from the barrel (be gentle !)

Now remove those 2 screws

Note how the hop up unit works

The inner barrel (made of brass) length is 113 mm, its diameter is 6.04 mm

The hop up rubber is a VSR10 type

Remove the rear sight screw

You can remove the nozzle by removing the screw from the back of the slide (you need a 2,5 alen key)

You can slightly spread the slide sides in order to remove the blowback housing (be very gentle about it !)

You can now remove the nozzle from the housing (it's a Hi-Capa nozzle, you may replace it by a WE one if you need to)

You can now remove the piston head

Now, to reassemble the gun

Put the nozzle back in the blowback housing and put the spring in the right location

Put the blowback housing back in place and put the screw back

Put the hop up rubber back on the inner barrel in the right position and put the barrel back in the hop up unit

Put the wheel and the hop up bar back in place

Reassemble the hop up unit and put the inner barrel assembly back in the external barrel

Put the spring on the spring guide, put back the spring guide plug and put the whole assembly back in the slide

Put back the rear sight screw and put the slide assembly back on the frame of the gun

The magazine uses standard Tokyo Marui percussion and injection valves

To remove the magazine floorplate, you'll need a thin tool to push through this hole

If you have a leak, try to tight this screw on the left, it might resolve the issue

The lips can be replaced by Hi-Capa WE lips or KP-05 KJ Works lips (the opposite isn't true)

The bbs follower can be replaced by Hi-Capa WE lips or KP-05 KJ Works lips

The gun is sold with a rail

In order to install the rail, you'll need to make two holes in the frame here, using the metal stick we saw earlier

If you don't need the rail, you don't need to make the holes, obviously

This gun, which has a plastic slide, isn't supposed to be used with stronger gas like Ultrair

It could break your gun

For GBB with plastic slides (like Marui GBB), we recommend to use Abbey 144A gas

You may use Predator Ultra gas if the temperature is low enough

If the look and mechanics of the gun is inspired from 1911, in Airsoft, Hi-Capa use their own parts and are not compatible with airsoft 1911 parts

The Hi-Capa 5.1 Tokyo Marui isn't a replica of an actual firearm

However, the looks is obviously inspired from the guns of the Texan company STI International, famous for its STI 2011 pistols

STI 2011 are pistols based on the design of the Colt 1911, but they use double stack magazines and therefore carry much more ammunitions

Also, the lower receiver is made of two parts, the body and the grip being two different parts

Others parts are different like the skeletonised trigger and hammer, the fat magazine floorplate...

They are very modular guns

Those guns, very expensive, are mostly used by sport shooters

Le Hi-Capa 5.1 Tokyo Marui has a very close resemblance to the STI Eagle 5.0 2011

The Hi-Capa, for IPCS, is a great base since you can really custom it with a lot of aftermarket parts

You can find inspiration from the "Gold Match" Tokyo Marui for example, which is also available on our website

The Hi-Capa 5.1 Tokyo Marui is a very nice GBB, even among Tokyo Marui guns

It has a lot of range and is very accurate, and its finish is also very nice

Even if it's made of plastic, if you treat it well, it will last a long time !

If you liked this video, please like it, share it, leave a comment, subscribe, etc !

It was Diane for Airsoft Entrepot TV ! See you next time and until then, good games !

For more infomation >> [Présentation] Hi-Capa 5.1 Tokyo Marui - Duration: 9:19.

-------------------------------------------

Law and Vengeance: The Justice Department Turns Whistleblowers Into The Victim - Duration: 4:31.

Most Americans believe that whistleblowers are well protected in this country and nothing's

farther from the truth.

We've had administrations, the last administration, we would hear the attorney general talking

about gee whiz, our priority is whistleblower and if a whistleblower comes forward, we're

going to protect them.

We're going to make sure that we act and we get a result for them and we change the type

of thing that they're trying to change.

Nothing is farther from the truth.

Whistleblowers become victims more than they become heroes, even when they uncover the

worst kind of conduct by Corporate America, the worst kind of conduct.

It's not unusual for the whistleblower to actually end up in jail and the corporation

that he's trying to blow the whistle on pays a fine and nobody ever suffers a consequence

beyond that.

This idea that this is easy for a whistleblower, that a whistleblower, yeah he wants to collect

some percentage of whatever the case might be and that he's doing this out of greed.

That is so inaccurate.

Most whistleblowers what they go through is agonizing simply to do what they know has

to be done.

Look, we have whistleblowers that have come in that I've handled where what they're talking

about is blowing the whistle that's making a pharmaceutical that they know has the propensity

to kill women between the ages of 18 to 35.

Now, that sounds like pretty important information and when that whistleblower goes forward and

reports that that conduct is taking place, you would expect that the Department of Justice

and government would understand how important that is and treat that whistleblower with

decency.

They treat them like second class citizens.

If they get paid on a case like this, like I just described, they often do get paid but

what they go through to get there is agonizing.

Law and Vengeance is based on a true story from the standpoint of the whistleblower coming

to us, giving us the facts, us doing our due diligence, actually looking into it.

It was absolutely accurate.

Everything that he said was true.

The manufacturer knew that they had a defective product.

They kept it on the market anyway knowing that that defective product had the potential

to cause death.

If you're a policeman and you've got a gun sight and it's supposed to be a gun sight

that works, it just supposed to work all the time and nobody's told you by the way, you

might want to know that when it gets out into the heat or gets into humidity, it has a potential

to fail entirely.

People need to know that.

The truth is the company did know that.

The government was completely asleep as they often are in buying these big purchases.

These government contractors get away with absolute anything they want nowadays.

This is a government contractor that is no different than most of them.

If we think of most government contractors and we follow the history of them, if they

commit something, if they commit a fraud in year one, by year three, they're doing business

with the government again.

I think most taxpayers would be appalled because taxpayers end up footing that bill for a defective

product, for fraud, for loss of billions of dollars, billions of dollars that are just

go down tubes because government doesn't do their job where it comes to reigning in the

powers of these weapons manufacturers, defense manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, you

name it.

I could go right down the list.

It's almost as if even when these folks are caught, there's nothing to suffer.

They get paid.

They get a fine for a billion dollars.

Let me give you an example.

A defense contractor that gets fined a billion dollars has probably made six or $7 billion,

and so it's a cost of doing business.

They pay the fine.

They keep the other six or $7 million and they go their way.

Nobody goes to jail.

Nobody's harmed.

They're put on a list for a little while and before you know it, they're back on the list

of defense contractors that can sell to the government.

There's no downside.

It's simply cost of doing business.

For more infomation >> Law and Vengeance: The Justice Department Turns Whistleblowers Into The Victim - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

Kuinka vaihtaa iskunvaimentimen yläkiinnikkeen korjaussetti FIAT PUNTO merkkiseen autoon OHJEVIDEO - Duration: 8:49.

Use a socket №15 and a combination spanner №17

Use a combination spanner №19 and a hex-nut wrench №6

Using a special tool to compress the spring

Use a wrench № 27  and a hex wrench № 6

For more infomation >> Kuinka vaihtaa iskunvaimentimen yläkiinnikkeen korjaussetti FIAT PUNTO merkkiseen autoon OHJEVIDEO - Duration: 8:49.

-------------------------------------------

FIFA 18 EA ACCES GLITCH PLAY FIFA ALREADY FOR FREE!! 1000 HOURS - Duration: 2:40.

lo4

For more infomation >> FIFA 18 EA ACCES GLITCH PLAY FIFA ALREADY FOR FREE!! 1000 HOURS - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

Машинки - Транспорт и спецтехника - Машины для детей - Мультики про машинки - Duration: 1:51.

For more infomation >> Машинки - Транспорт и спецтехника - Машины для детей - Мультики про машинки - Duration: 1:51.

-------------------------------------------

The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood | w/MagicCatJenny | Buddy Read Book Review [CC] - Duration: 18:09.

Kathy: Hi, YouTube, it's Kathy, and this is my friend Jenny. Jenny, tell the internet about yourself.

Jenny: Hi, I am MagicCatJenny on YouTube and pretty much everywhere

else on the Internet and my YouTube channel is about Booktube and more - many,

many, more things. [laughs] Kathy: Yeah, we're we're very similar in that we do

just all of the things - whatever we feel like doing on the YouTubes is what we do on the

YouTubes. So we're here today to talk about The Handmaid's Tale. We've both

read this kind of recently and we did so intentionally so we could do a

collaboration, which means over on Jenny's channel we have talked about

Slaughterhouse-Five, so go check out that video; links will be down in the

doobly-doo. We also decided that we're going to give ourselves a limited amount

of time to talk about the book, just so this isn't a kajillion years long as a

video because that could happen [Jenny: It could.] So I'm starting the 20 minute timer now and

it will annoy us in 20 minutes. Okay, so background - in case you're one of like

three people on Booktube that have never heard about this book. Handmaid's Tale is from

1985, written by Margaret Atwood who is Canadian, and it's a dystopian novel and

it was recently made into a TV show which I have not seen yet but heard is

very, very good. Oh, you're over here. Hi! [laughter]

Jenny: I have seen the show Kathy: Oh, good! Jenny: And actually- Kathy: Does it transfer well?

Jenny: Yes. I actually watched the show as it was being released on Hulu. So, I'd watch it

every week and I watched it before I read the book

which normally I don't like doing because that tends to make me less

interested in the book when I'm reading it because I already know everything

that's going on, but actually, it - I mean the book is really, really good and it

very - it it matches up really well. Like, it's a very, very close adaptation. There are

some major differences, but if you like the book, you you won't be disappointed

with the show at all. Kathy: So I'm assuming, like, the major differences were

definitely, like, the intentional differences just because we're in a different

medium as opposed to like, "we're just completely ignoring the plot of the book".

Jenny: Yeah, there were there were a few little things [Kathy: I'm cool with that] that were different.Llike, some

characters were a little bit different but nothing - nothing that would make you

"oh, why did they change that?" Like, the most - the major difference is just

the time in which it takes place. They made it take place in like this year.

Which actually made it even more frightening, I think. Kathy: Yeah, and I feel like

there has been quite a bit of discussion about this book and what's currently

happening in say America - so yeah. That was probably a very intentional update to timeline.

Jenny: Yeah. I recommend both but they're but they're intense.

Kathy: Good to know.

I will - I will try to track down the Hulu show at some point because it seems like

something I would watch. I'll put it on my very long "to watch" list. So yeah, set in this

dystopian world where basically infertility is a big issue and there are

people who work as handmaids, who are basically the reproducers of the society.

So if there is a couple that, they can't have babies - and they never blame it on

the man, I noticed this. They're like, "yeah it's never the man's fault if she can't

get pregnant; it's clearly the wife's fault so we'll get this handmaid and if

the man still can't reproduce with her it's still her fault that there's not child". Which[frustrated]

Jenny: Yeah, so, is this world - the way I read it was almost as if this was something

that was happening on, like, a large scale in the world, where, like, infertility was

becoming a bigger and bigger issue so the reasons the Handmaid's were chosen

is because they were still able, or they they had children recently, or were - or

maybe they ran some tests. I'm not sure exactly, but felt like -

Kathy: Yeah, they had some history of

having a child like our main character, I remember ,had a child and was like

separated from her child and her husband or common-law or whatever he was.

I can't remember. Um and was put to work as somebody to continue the

population but specifically for these like upper class of people.

Jenny: Yeah, so it was interesting to think of what if this sort of, you know, worldwide

problem, or however big it is, isn't just the women, it's it's the men too, so

there's nothing about, like, oh let's find the fertile men and have them be, you

know, like the - like that's really interesting and I think very purposeful

decision, is that there's not, like, also handmen who impregnate the women. Like,

that could help solve this problem or that could you know but no it's just the women.

Kathy: Yeah and that was just it was also just such a weird thing where

there were a bunch of people, like, "hey I will have sex with you, main character,

just in case the guy you were working for is shooting blanks;

you know, you got to make sure you get pregnant. He'll never know it's not his,"

and it's just like such a weird way to go about reproduction.

Jenny: Yeah, there was a scene in the book, I think she's going to go shopping and she walks past one of

the guards and she almost, like, purposefully, like, sways her hips because

she knows that there's - that they don't - like, these young men don't have

girlfriends. They don't see women that often. She knows like the effect she's

having. The way that that sexuality is sort of, almost, taken away from the

society entirely, except for, you know, of course in these sort of, I guess,

illegal clubs, where it's like - that is the point. But even, you know, I mean at

that time it was written, it was written about modern time, and the show is modern

time for us. Like how quickly, like, it seemed as if it went really quickly in

the world of the book. Like, they just burned all the fashion magazines, like,

everything's just - it's just gone. That's so scary to think, that, like, your entire

culture could just be like snuffed out because it's entirely possible. It's just so scary.

Kathy: Yeah it's - it's so strange, too, because

my biggest reference for this book before I read it was just after the US

election I went to see a vaudeville show with a troupe that I usually perform

with but I was too busy so I was just watching the show and they did a whole

take on it and they were just like "Margaret Atwood is a goddamn Nostradamus"

and then they basically did, like, a very quick rendition of what happened in the

book but like just to eerie, errie music, and I was like, yep,

yeah it's scary how much I could see this type of stuff happening if - if

things kept going down the rabbit hole. So that I think that is the scariest thing about it.

Um, what have they call it? Did they call it

the tradition or the ceremony - they're, like, once a month, sanctioned shag fest?

Jenny: Yeah, Ceremony. Kathy: -seemed like the least sexy thing of all time

because you have the wife [Jenny: yeah] holding on to the woman -the handmaid - who's, I'm pretty sure

mostly still clothed except for, like, underpants and then, like, the husband

doing his bit for fertility. Weirdest...[grossed out sounds] Yeah and it's somehow... I

appreciated that this was a society that was like "rape is not cool" - [but] it was just as

invasive, because it's not like she had a choice to not be a handmaid.

Jenny: Yeah, the line - the line of "is this rape, is it not?" it's a very blurred. Watching the show

and I do I do think it's a really great show and really great book but, but some

of those scenes were very difficult to watch. Just, just because of how real and

how great the actors were and all the- they filmed everything very, very close,

tight close-ups on people's faces and it's just those scenes were like my

least favorite. They're done well, but they were my least favorite to watch, because it's [grossed out]-

Kathy: Yeah I imagine they would be incredibly uncomfortable to watch because

it's such a weird world, because it's like, "oh we've gotten rid of rape"-

Jenny: But not you haven't, not really.

Kathy, Actually, no, like any

situation where you have to do this or else we're just gonna kill you is rape.

Jenny: Yeah one thing about the book that I thought was really interesting because

it wasn't in the show, so it was a bit of a surprise for me

reading, was the sort of epilogue that takes place in like years and years and

years in the future and like the whole the whole story was found on these audio tapes of Offred.

Kathy: Yeah which is an interesting take.

Jenny: Yeah, that does not happen in the- in the show, and that was interesting because a lot of the the

people who are talking about her tapes, like, questioning whether or not she was

lying, or how true some of it [was] and a lot of - a lot of the men characters in-

in that epilogue being like, "oh I don't know". It was just, even that part was so frustrating.

Kathy: Yeah, exactly [overlap] If somebody took the time to tell this story

in a way to try to get it out to the masses, shouldn't you just believe them?

Jenny: Yeah Kathy: Yeah, yes, I was also frustrated with that. And it was also just kind of a weird way,

like weird in a good way, a good way to end it, but also just like, you you didn't really know

what happened, because it has that - [Jenny: Yeah] kind of abrupt "she just stopped

recording tapes" ending, you don't know if she succeeded in getting away, or if

she was killed. Like, you just don't know.

Jenny: Definitely and that might change because

there is gonna be a second season [Kathy: Okay!] Yeah, but Margaret- Margaret Atwood is

very involved in the production and very involved in writing the next season so-

Kathy: Yeah and it's interesting that, like, taking something that is just, like, one

text and then putting it into, like, a TV format and then deciding that there's

going to be another season on top of it, even though there's not more written work to

go from is really interesting to me. The other, like, book to TV show

adaptation that's done that recently is Thirteen Reasons Why. They're going to be

continuing that one as a second season then, like, there's - there's nothing after

that point book wise, so like I'm interested to see what's going to happen. [Jenny: Right.]

Is it going to be a lot more of just dealing with the fallout of that

situation? Is it dealing with that and actually getting justice for it, or is it

just going to be incredibly frustrating? Like, yeah, so -

it'll be interesting to see what they do with the second season of this. It's good

that the original author is involved, because then you have some form of

integrity, although books belong to their readers, so there's that whole thing, but

I feel more comfortable with Margaret Atwood being a part of writing the

"second book," as it were, into a second season of the show.

Jenny: Yeah, I think - I think

definitely and this might be a topic for another video but books and their TV or

film adaptations and how that can change how you read a book or how you watch a

show, based on which one you've experienced first. Normally I find it

frustrating if I do the two too close to each other.

I couldn't get into the Game of Thrones books at all because I had seen the show

and I tried reading the first book and I just- I couldn't get into it, because it

moves so much slower than the show.

Kathy: It's interesting because I watched, I think,

the first season, and then I read all of the books, because - and that actually

helped me because while I was watching the TV show, I would have to stop it

every once in a while and be like, "okay which guy with a beard is this?" Cuz there were a lot of characters

and a lot of them look similar, [Jenny: yeah.] but because I had those actors in my head

while I was trying to read the book and it was so much easier. so like, I would

read the book,s and I would see those actors as those characters. So it's

interesting that we have two different takes on that. Yeah, I like that.

Jenny: Yeah, another experience with that I obviously read Harry Potter books before seeing

the films because they came out before but [laughter] obviously - but I remember I reread

all of the books before the final film and when I watched the final film, I

found myself frustrated and angry at it more than I've been angry at any of the

other films, and certainly some of those aren't as close to the books as, like, the

last ones are, but I just was criti[cal] - I was very intensely critical because I just

finished reading the last book

Kathy: Yeah I have a best friend who is a huge Potter fan and she can't do it too closer she gets very mad.

So I didn't actually read the Harry Potter books until 2013, um [laughs] but, like, my best friend's a

huge Harry Potter fan so she I had seen the first two movies and then she

complained so hard about them; I think they switched directors for the third

movie [Jenny: Yeah] that I just didn't see the rest of the movies, because she complained

about such a little change that I wouldn't have noticed because I didn't read the books.

Jenny: That's interesting Kathy: Yeah, it's it's just weird that I just never

got around to. it I mean I've read and seen all of it, so yeah, but it was like,

it was such an intensely popular thing, and when something is super intensely

popular, I don't want to read it right away. I'm just weird like that.

My little brother loved it. It got him into reading, but, like, I was already a

hardcore reader, so I didn't need that, like, push into "this makes kids read".

I'm like "I was reading before it was cool" [Jenny: Yeah.] Yeah I was that kid, so...

Jenny: Yeah, I wasn't super into those books right when they were popular, when the first books came

out and the sort of Harry Potter mania started happening, I wasn't like super

into it at that time either. I read the books and enjoyed them but I wasn't, like,

in the fandom till probably like college, when like I guess it was getting pretty,

you know, the movies kept coming out and all of that, but yeah, it's interesting.

The third movie had a different director but I actually think it's better.

Kathy: I think they also might have switched locations for like the Grand Hall or something -

something, like, I probably wouldn't even notice, really bother her so I just never ended up

seeing the film for like years, cuz she complained about it so much. Like I was

like, "I don't really care; I like, I see it- the draw, I see the draw. This is really

good storytelling, blah blah blah, but there's so many things to read!"

So in some ways it made it feel like this happened like immediately; uh, you did kind of see

a lead-up to this happening in her flashback scenes with her happy family.

You did see, like, things shutting down and then suddenly her not having access

to her bank account. Like, that was very close to, like, her being captured and

forced into this lifestyle, but you kind of saw it happening bit by bit.

And it's so interesting to see that again with the current political landscape - it's just, yes, terrifying.

Jenny: Yeah, actually I borrowed this book from my sister-in-law because at my

library it was like checked out with like over a hundred people on the

waiting list so {Kathy: Oh, yes!] so I borrowed it from her and I just wanted to show you-

it's really cute- little post-it and I dunno if you can see, it's this little llama

post-it note that just says "question authority." Kathy: Nice that is really cute. I approve.

Jenny: Yeah, she actually read it in school. [I found] question discussions. I was thinking I

think it's using this for our video but they're they're very specific there's a lot of them.

Kathy: Oh, yeah, just like the things that you would make a high schooler write and

essay about? [Jenny: Yeah.] Booktube just wants to talk about things in

general, maybe going to specifics, but not like, write a five paragraph essay on things.

Jenny: Yeah I really, I really enjoyed it. Again, is interesting considering I read it right after seeing the show.

Kathy: I felt it was weird in this in this book how many different types of classes women there

were and they were classed under like legitimate women / illegitimate women and

then, like, how they were basically making women police themselves [alarm goes off]

I guess that was our 20 minutes. I'm gonna finish that thought anyway,

how they were basically making women police themselves by having these different

class structures within being a woman, so like, you've had the wives, you had the

daughters, you have the handmaid's, but if you were a- if you were a person who

just wanted to have sex, you were a Jezebel [Jenny: Yeah.]- underclass type of person.

It was just so weird and it's -it's, yeah. It's a lot of what, like, girl on girl hate

is now currently, is just basically policing each other.

Jenny: Yeah, no... it felt as if it was almost sort of like the way some people might think of women and

judge them but making it very much like a part of the society. So, almost, like,

justifying those judgments and saying that they're okay because this is just

the way things are and not like oh...

Kathy: Yeah, like, "I'm just following the rules by telling you you can't do you want to do" and it's like think about

where these rules came from!

Jenny: One of those categories wasn't in the show,

which I noticed reading the book and that was the category of women that were

of a lesser, like, class status and they had - they had to do like all the

different jobs so they had multicolored outfits.

Kathy: Yeah, I think they were called a econowives.

Jenny: Yes! Econowives... uggg.

Kathy: Women who married relatively low ranking men but yeah are not part of the elite. So if you

have read the book, or if you've seen the TV show, let us know your thoughts down

in the comments below, and if you haven't already you should go over to Jenny's

Channel and subscribe and watch her video that we did together as well on

Slaughterhouse-Five. And just all of her videos, because this is how we became

friends - I just kept watching your videos, so yay.

Yeah, I mean look at that face! How could you not subscribe to

that face. If you'd like this type of collaboration video, please let me know

because if you guys are digging it, I definitely enjoy doing this with Jenny,

so we could do this in the future if it's something that other people and not just

us enjoy. So yeah let us know down below.

Jenny: Thanks for watching!

Kathy: [laughter] Yeah, exactly, basically. So, yeah be sure to like, share, comment, subscribe at will and we'll see

you later. Bye! [Jenny: Bye!]

[outro music]

For more infomation >> The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood | w/MagicCatJenny | Buddy Read Book Review [CC] - Duration: 18:09.

-------------------------------------------

Gospel of the day Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - Duration: 14:04.

For more infomation >> Gospel of the day Tuesday, September 26, 2017 - Duration: 14:04.

-------------------------------------------

WRC 7 - Developer Diary - The Physics of WRC - Duration: 3:56.

I'm a dynamics engineer working with the WRC race cars.

I've been working with the WRC since 2011

but of course I'm also a WRC player.

That special combination is why you called me!

When I'm not working on a WRC rally, I play at home every night.

You're helping us today because you've already played WRC, right?

Yes, more WRC 6 than 5, but yes, I've already played.

So you could see the difference?

Yes, there was definitely a huge improvement!

All the sensations you have on the road, that's much more realistic than before,

and that's the biggest difference.

With the new WRC cars, which are faster and higher performance,

it adds a new challenge to the game because the aggressive engines really let you feel the speed.

As we saw today in the gravel stages, it's really remarkable.

I think the effect of speed is the hardest thing to achieve,

because between the 2016 and 2017 cars, the speed remains the same

but the tension is much clearer,

and that's what impressed me when we played: the engine speed...

...responds immediately.

And the first time I accelerated I felt that the back took off right away.

I wasn't expecting such power.

It's not reality,

but you're getting close to what we see in WRC's onboard cameras.

In the Polish stages, I could really appreciate the jumps in the turns,

because that's what actually happens in the real world. I was surprised.

So, we've tuned the car together. Can you tell me what you think were the parameters that most affected the car?

The suspension made a big difference.

The transmission surprised me because you can play with the front and rear differential

and balance them; it's really cool because it's very realistic.

And what you can do with the tires is good

because you saw how the car changes when you play with the level of grip.

It's cool because each time we change something

even for little things

we see how the car behaves completely differently,

and so the game's engine dynamics are much more reactive

and it allows us to adjust them very precisely.

Everything I've seen today will let the player play for a really long time,

with all the parameters that you can change,

the Epic Stages

— just improving your time in the stages will let you play for months and months.

Nobody wants a game where you only play for two months. This is completely the opposite.

The Epic Stages and the pacenotes

will be a big challenge for players who want to beat the fastest times, and it will take them a while.

For more infomation >> WRC 7 - Developer Diary - The Physics of WRC - Duration: 3:56.

-------------------------------------------

El Diablo vs Incubus | Suicide Squad (2016) Movie Clip - Duration: 3:47.

Oh, wow!

Uh-oh.

Who is this?

It's gonna be bad!

We should run.

GQ, come in. We're in position.

We gotta get him in that corner. That's where the bomb will be.

I'll do it! I'll get him there!

I lost one family. I ain't gonaa lose one another.

Look, think it through.

I got this.

Let me show you what I really am.

Over here!

Go!

Rick, in position. Standing by.

Diablo, drive him into the corner!

Get him mate. - Come on.

Yeah, do it!

Diablo, get clear! Get out of there!

Blow it!

Blow it.

Now GQ, now.

No!

Everybody down!

For more infomation >> El Diablo vs Incubus | Suicide Squad (2016) Movie Clip - Duration: 3:47.

-------------------------------------------

Energy Update – Massive Fear Energy In The Astrals - Duration: 7:44.

WHAT BINGE WATCHING CAN PHYSICALLY DO TO YOUR BODY

I�m sure that you hesitated before choosing to read this article, as most of us have been

sucked into a binge watching marathon on more than one occasion (myself included).

While it may seem like we�re buckling down to give ourselves a break, we may actually

be hurting ourselves far more than we realize.

Sitting for prolonged periods of time has proven to be harmful to our bodies, especially

for adults over 50, and when you match lounging with television, you create a deadly combo.

In an Australian study published in the journal Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, researchers

examined more than 8,900 adults and found that each additional hour of TV viewing was

associated with a 12% increased risk of inflammatory-related death, and those who spent more than four

hours a day watching TV were at an even higher risk.

In general, watching television has proven to negatively impact mental health; it alters

your brain, lowers your attention span, and has the potential to make you more aggressive.

You don�t need to experience the �trance-like� state television can put us in, but I�m

sure you�ve witnessed it before.

This trance occurs roughly 30 seconds after you start watching TV.

Your brain begins by producing alpha waves, leading to a light hypnotic state that makies

the viewer less aware of their environment and more open to subtle messages � aka programming.

In the 1990s.

Dr. Teresa Belton, a visiting fellow at the University of East Anglia, studied the effects

that television has on the imagination of 10-12 year old children, ultimately concluding

that television negatively impacts their development: �The ubiquity and ease of access to television

and videos perhaps robs today�s children of the need to pursue their own thoughts and

devise their own occupations, distracting them from inner processes and constantly demanding

responses to external agendas, and suggests that this may have implications for the development

of imaginative capacity.�

And these physical affects are becoming increasingly apparent.

Not only does it eventually lead to immobility as you age, but with the risk of creating

inflammation in the body, you are susceptible to a host of diseases including kidney disease,

diabetes, asthma, Alzheimer�s, and even depression.

Dr. Megan Grace is the lead investigator at the Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute in

Melbourne.

Between 1999 and 2000, her team quizzed adult participants about their viewing habits via

a questionnaire.

Again, this was before we had access to popular streaming websites like Netflix.

The participants were separated into three groups based on

their TV viewing habits: less than two hours per day, greater than two hours but less than

four hours, and more than four hours.

�TV time was associated with increased risk of inflammatory-related mortality.

This is consistent with the hypothesis that high TV viewing may be associated with a chronic

inflammatory state,� the authors wrote.

They followed up with their participants 12 years later and found, of 909 deaths, 130

were inflammatory-related.

Of the inflammatory-related deaths, 21 were from diseases of the respiratory system and

18 of the nervous system, and those who watched between two to four hours of TV a day showed

a 54% higher risk of inflammatory-related death.

Additionally, people who watched more than four hours of TV a day doubled their risk

of dying from an inflammatory disease compared to those who watched two hours.

In addition to cutting down the amount of time

you spend sitting in front of the TV and sitting or lying down, you can help combat

inflammation with a number of foods like avocados, berries, sweet potato, onions, and watermelon,

and herbs like, cloves, ginger, rosemary, and turmeric.

For more infomation >> Energy Update – Massive Fear Energy In The Astrals - Duration: 7:44.

-------------------------------------------

Is JUMP Worth It, "Netflix For Indies" | TALKS - Duration: 16:15.

You might have heard of JUMP, a new service being billed as the "Netflix of Indie Games."

But what is JUMP?

How does it work?

And is it worth it to you as a gamer?

JUMP is a monthly subscription service, meaning you pay $10 a month every month in order to

use it.

In return for your money, you are given an account that allows you to login to the JUMP

application, where you can then play whatever games are on the service as much, or as little,

as you'd like.

Netflix really is a good analogy for this.

Unlike other streaming game services, such as OnLive or Playstation Now, JUMP has slightly

different technology under the hood.

As opposed to streaming the game to you, and therefore adding potential latency issues

to your gameplay, JUMP instead sends small chunks of the entire game to your PC.

The browser application then sees that as a 'fully installed' game, reading it no differently

than if you had downloaded the full title and installed it yourself.

Though there are some serious questions to be asked about how exactly this system works,

since you can play games through a browser without the application and browser storage

is limited to 81.92 kilobytes.

While I won't delve into this any further, it does lead me to question that they're really

doing what they say they're doing.

This also means that your own hardware handles the game, so you can't stream more demanding

games to your PC than it can handle.

This isn't a way to play the newest most blistering AAA title at Ultra without upgrading.

It also means that as long as you have the next chunk of your game downloaded, you're

ready to go, though if you do go offline you won't be able to play after a certain point.

It doesn't immediately log you off the service when you go offline, so in theory it's not

Always Online.

However, there's no downloading a game for a plane or road trip, or preloading an entire

game if you're on bad internet, so in reality it absolute is Always Online.

In fact, in my own experience, everytime I purposefully took myself offline the entire

JUMP application would just crash after about 20 seconds.

JUMP has a somewhat storied history.

The developer, Kermdinger Studios, was a indie developer who produced two unreleased titles,

Stunt Runner and IllumiCube.

IllumiCube was a contest entry in the Intel RealSense App Challenge 2014, though it did

not win any placements.

Stunt Runner was a Unity title with a failed Kickstarter in September 2014, even after

being shown at PAX PRIME on the Indie Mega Booth.

It did manage to be Greenlit on Steam in December of 2014.

As was very common at the time, Kermdinger offered free copies of their game if you would

vote Yes for the Greenlight.

After doing some number-crunching, they realized that this game would never recoup the investment

that they had made into the game so far.

Steam games have been steady declining in average price, and in average ownership since

2013.

An average game would cost $9.99 and sell roughly 165,000 copies in 2013.

By 2014 that number had already decreased to $8.99 and 44,000 copies.

This was the beginning of Steam becoming overly saturated.

Whereas in 2013, only 30 or 40 games were released every month, by 2014 you were seeing

200 a month.

This has only gotten worse, as today in 2017 an average game will cost $5.99 and sell only

4,000 copies, and over 500 games are released every month.

Seeing this trend, Kermdinger started a new project called Boondogl.

Planned to launch in Quarter 4 of 2015, Boondogl was designed to be a curated digital game

subscription service.

This is what is now known as JUMP.

Originally envisioned as a streaming service with web-based exports of developer titles,

Boondogl's entire system and JUMP's current model are identical with the exception of

this change from web-exports to chunk exchange.

Now this is an important distinction and it's the reason why JUMP 'works.'

Other streaming services like PSNow render the game remotely, on a server somewhere in

the world, and then broadcasts that gameplay to you.

Imagine Twitch but you have a controller and you're the player.

This means your personal PC specs don't matter, you can have a potato and still play Crysis

on Ultra.

However, the inputs from your controller have to travel to that server, the server responds

and sends it back, meaning there is always latency in the input.

Pixel perfect is impossible in this environment.

With JUMP, the game is played on your PC.

The next question, then, is are the games worth playing in the first place?

JUMP is a curation service, first and foremost.

It uses three metrics to determine if a title should be available.

First, if the game has won any awards.

The second is its rating on Metacritic or Steam, and third is if the game is a quote-unquote

"Runaway Seller."

According to Anthony Palma, the CEO of Jump, in an interview with Siliconera said "If it

sold a million copies regardless of the other two, it's a game people wanted to play.

It's an objective way to put a line in the sand and say this is the kind of quality of

game we want on the platform."

This curation is something that gamers, specifically Steam users, have complained about for years.

Since Steam opened the floodgates, and Gabe Newell has repeatedly said that Valve has

no intention of barring poor quality.

Only of trying to surface it less.

Steam users who have been on the service for years often nostalgically complain about 'the

good ol days' when Valve itself only allowed the top quality games on their platform.

Developers also complain because with the flood of titles coming to the platform every

month, no individual game has a chance to surface to the top without a huge marketing

budget or a fanatically rabid fanbase.

This led to grey-market activities like offering game keys for greenlight votes, or black-hat

activities like creating free steam keys and running multiple copies, harvesting steam

trading cards for profit, OR pricing the game unrealistically high, and selling those steam

keys directly to bundle sites so they can market the bundle as being 95% off.

It's easy to see, then, why a curated service that only adds a small number of games every

month and which verifies that those games are--in fact--of high quality would be valuable.

As of today, there are 63 titles available on JUMP.

If you signed up right now for a 14 day free trial, you could play all 63 immediately.

After hitting play, there's a short download and you're off.

However, are those games really of a higher quality?

Of the 63 games available, only 5 are overwhelmingly positive on Steam.

That's around 8%.

The way Steam ranks it's reviews is a bit of a mystery, but can be assumed to generally

match the system on screen.

So, where do most of the games on JUMP sit?

In the "Very Positive" category.

This means they are 8/10 to 9/10 games.

This is actually a remarkably high average.

It means that generally speaking the games that you'll play are well regarded by most

of the people who played it.

What's most interesting, however, is the category that isn't shown.

The Category of "None."

These are games that didn't have enough reviews to get a category, or were never available

on Steam, and therefore have No Rating.

This category of JUMP games is almost 30%.

And the titles in that category are generally unheard of titles.

Or, in terms of titles that are more known, they have previously been heavily discounted

as high at 75% off.

In the less known category, that goes as high as 95% off.

Additionally, over 40% of these "NONE" category games have previously been available absolutely

free.

Many of them still are.

You can google the game, and find a completely free downloadable version on GameJolt or Itch,

and play it without ever paying for a JUMP subscription.

I have no serious concerns about this.

I believe a developer should be able to monetize their titles, and I understand that many indies

cannot reliably charge money for a game if they want anyone to play it.

Even a pricetag of $1 could mean that they do not make a single dollar, whereas many

gamers are willing to play a game for free, and that kind of success can lead to later

games that do provide a living to the developer.

However, I have to question why anyone should pay to play a free game.

Already at least one of these games has been pulled from all free download sites and is

now available exclusively on JUMP, and I wouldn't be surprised if that continues with all the

other developers.

Why give the milk away for free if you can force them to rent the cow.

In total, over 15% of the entire JUMP library is free or previously free titles, only one

of which is as high as "Very Positive."

Over half of the entire library is titles that had very reviews, or the dreaded "Mixed"

reviews, or no reviews at all.

This seriously calls into question, for me, how stringently they stick to their 3 core

principles on adding a game to their library.

It unquestionable that many of these never won an award, aren't rated highly on metacritic

or steam, and certainly didn't sell millions of copies.

Some of these are fairly recent, and so it's understandable that they wouldn't have the

time to build a reputation.

To have won awards, or achieved critical or commercial success.

However, almost 80% of the games are at least one year old.

Half of them are two or more years old, with 10% being titles released in 2013.

In fact, of all the games on the library, well over half of the 2017 titles fall into

this 'No Rating' category.

This means that you are primarily getting much older titles, or getting unknown titles

without any serious critical response.

The highest rated titles are from 2014, 2014, 2016, 2016, and 2016, respectively.

And, with a single exception, all five have all been available for around $1.

In fact, when talking about the price of the games available on JUMP, they seem to be either

very inexpensive titles, or titles that have been in bundles and on sale for much less

than their original sales price.

When we take the average amount these games have been on sale for, it is over 60% off

ON AVERAGE.

Over 40% have seen sales over 70% off, and almost 20% have seen sales of at least 90%.

These are not premium titles.

The average retail price of a game on JUMP is just over $7.50.

But the average sale price of these titles is just over $2.50.

This just confirms that you shouldn't expect to be seeing AAA titles when you sign up for

JUMP.

With over 60 titles available, however, this does mean you're getting a library worth ovewr

$160 for $10 a month.

If you plan to play all of them, that's a pretty good deal on the face of it.

Really, though, it comes down to how much time you're getting from these titles.

Time is very important to JUMP.

Similar to Netflix, Kindle Unlimited, YouTube RED, developers are paid based on the amount

of time you spend in the game.

JUMP is understandably reticent to give hard numbers, but from their Boondogl press release

and comments made by JUMP staffmembers, it's anywhere from 25-60 cents per hour.

Obviously, if no one signs up for JUMP that's lower, and if they get swamped it goes up.

It's all based on achieving a large number of players and a smaller number of games.

For the user, however, it's a question of "how many hours am I getting for my $10 a

month."

While some games have a time-to-beat of as high as 12 hours, half of the games are under

2 hours to complete, and the average amount of time is 2 hours and 30 minutes.

If you signed up today, you would get a $160 library that has roughly 158 hours of gameplay

available.

Again, that's not a terrible proposition.

The problem comes, personally, when we look to the future.

JUMP plans to add between 6 and 10 new games a month.

Based on these current statistics, that's between $16 and $26 in value in sale prices,

and between 15 and 23 hours of gameplay.

Still not an absurd amount of money per hour, to be sure, but definitely not a huge discount

for the user.

Assuming you play 4 or 5 of them for 2 or 3 hours a piece, it's not any different than

if you'd just bought them on sale on Steam.

Extrapolating that out for a year, and you'll have paid $120 for a $425 library of roughly

160 games, with around 400 hours of gameplay.

After two years, $240 for a $680 library of 255 games with 640 hours of gameplay.

Roughly one hour a day, for about $0.38 an hour.

Of course, that leads into the final issue with JUMP.

You cannot find out what games are in the JUMP library without signing up.

There's no list of games you can look at and say "I would play these games, and therefore

it's worth it to me."

In fact, many of the games on this list were already in my library from various bundles.

Instead, you have to sign up, and hope that you like the games available.

Games like Stunt Runner, from Kermdinger Studios.

The value of JUMP seems to be for gamers who love indie titles, and are willing to play

anything and everything just for the experience.

If you don't play them, and you don't play everything, you're not getting a better value

then buying the games outright.

If you only play one title a month, you're absolutely better off just buying that title

alone and not subscribing for the others.

In this way, it's similar to the Humble Monthly.

You have no idea what games are going to come next month.

You might get games you already have or have no intention or interest in ever playing.

Unlike Humble, there's a very good chance you'll get a game that almost nobody's ever

heard of, that was available for free, or that simply nobody purchased or played.

For JUMP to succeed, they need people to sign up on both sides.

They developers with interesting and unique titles, or even their own Netflix Originals,

which is obviously why Stunt Runner is available.

They also need users who want to play these unknown indie titles.

Unfortunately, they're also stuck in a position where it is more profitable to release a game

on Steam and then after several years of slowly lowering your sale price and getting as much

money from the Steam community as possible, only then releasing the title to JUMP.

This means that the only titles that are going to come to JUMP are either older titles, or

poorly selling titles.

We'll never see the next great indie smash game showing up JUMP while there's still an

audience buying it on Steam.

That really leaves 2 very small, very niche audiences for this platform.

Users who are new to gaming and want to experience these older indie titles on the cheap, or

gamers who don't care about playing titles that are much older, or very inexpensive.

Because of this, it's very difficult for me to see a long-term success for JUMP.

And I certainly can't recommend it, though I find myself in the interesting position

of not being able to NOT recommend it either.

This is a service that is for you, if it's for you.

If you are that niche audience, there's really no reason not to try it out.

There is a 14 day free trial, and currently you could beat every single game on the platform

in that period of time if you were really devoted to it.

Additionally, I applaud JUMP for finding a solution that actually pays these developers

for the work they've put into making their games.

I'm also personally very interested in the VR titles they've said they'll be releasing

in the future, though those expectations are tempered by the fact that they will probably

be free or cheap VR games I might not be interested in.

In end, I just can't tell you whether or not you should jump on JUMP.

I want to give a shoutout to The Golden Bolt for recommending this topic.

He's another YouTuber and you can certainly check him out if you enjoy traditional game

reviews.

This topic is a bit outside of our usual wheelhouse, as we are primarily game critics.

However, this service is something that seems to be a major topic of conversation lately,

and since our primary goal at CryMor is to educate our viewers and provide information

for consumers who are trying to decide if they should or should not buy a game, this

felt like something of value to you.

I'd love to hear from you, let me know what you think about JUMP.

Have you tried it?

Is it something you're now interested in, or something you were interested in and no

longer are.

Where do you see the future of JUMP?

In the description you'll find a link to a PDF version of the spreadsheet I used that

has all of the games available on JUMP, along with the various calculations on Pricing,

Release Dates, Playtime, and more.

If you like it, like it, if you don't like it, don't like it.

If you did like it though, why don't you watch another one in the corner there, and as always,

we'll see you on the next one.

For more infomation >> Is JUMP Worth It, "Netflix For Indies" | TALKS - Duration: 16:15.

-------------------------------------------

Episodio #1226 Estomago hinchado - Duration: 8:39.

For more infomation >> Episodio #1226 Estomago hinchado - Duration: 8:39.

-------------------------------------------

Joni's Corner: Get Up and Go - Duration: 1:33.

I'm Joni Eareckson Tada and I want you to consider with me today Abraham, the Old Testament patriarch.

God said to Abraham, "Leave your country, leave your people and go to the land I will show you."

And Hebrews chapter 11 says that Abraham "… obeyed and went, even though he did not know where he was going."

That to me is so amazing.

Abraham had no idea, he was clueless where he was going but it says that he immediately got up and went.

Oh but us?

All too often, when God tells us to get up and go do something,

we kind of shuffle our feet, we ho hum, rationalize that we're not quite certain we heard God right.

After all, we want to know where God is sending us.

I think we'd be quicker to obey God's call immediately if we understood that blessings always accompany obedience.

When it comes to obeying the Lord,

If your get up and go, has gone up and gone somewhere, then you better go get it.

Because blessings await you when you obey… and obey (snap to it) on the double.

For more infomation >> Joni's Corner: Get Up and Go - Duration: 1:33.

-------------------------------------------

Overwatch Moments #88 - Duration: 10:10.

For more infomation >> Overwatch Moments #88 - Duration: 10:10.

-------------------------------------------

DIY CESTA DECORATIVA DE PAPEL PERIÓDICO FÁCIL - Duration: 10:56.

For more infomation >> DIY CESTA DECORATIVA DE PAPEL PERIÓDICO FÁCIL - Duration: 10:56.

-------------------------------------------

Our HOMEMADE PLANE is finished! | FLYING BIKE #2 - Duration: 5:27.

We started building our homemade plane in our last video

We now have to cover the wings and stabilize it

the experiment is about using normal materials to build a plane

so we will use bed sheets to cover the wings

the fabric has to be sealed

normal paint isn't perfect but as you know, we try to just use normal materials

we have to stabilize the fuselage

so we bought another old laundry spider

now we have to balance it so we build this thing

the bike is fixed here

so we will see what happens when I get on the bike

it is balanced pretty well

but we still aren't shure if we will be able to hold it stable

maybe we will have to use three wheels

we will now test if it is possible to stabilize the plane while driving

we couldn't go very fast because the front wheel will go up

so I would drive on one wheel unable to steer

this is why someone had to hold it

so we will attach two more wheels to hold it stable

we just went up to 15km/h

the plane should take of at 40 km/h

this should be possible when we attach the wheels

if you have an idea how we could call the plane let us know in the comments

you have been pretty creative for our submarine

we will work on our human drone very soon, we still are waiting for the rotors

we have given the model away on PATREON

thanks to everyone who supports us!

unfortunately we won't be able to upload every week

because it is a lot of work

and we want to produce the best quality for you!

So don't forget to SUBSCRIBE! ;)