Almost ripping the clothes
While I was making a pose
Under the light
I'm under the light
Girl got a pose
She's fin to pose
You're a delight
Give you a rose
Hit me up
Hit me up tonight
I'm asking you for the number
You're solving a problem
Call me tonight
Girl I am the night
Hit me up
Hit me up
Then I'll put on the clothes
Then I'll put on the clothes
I'm under the lights
I'm the night
Girl I'm the night
Girl I'm the night
I don't like problems
Cause it ain't my problem
So what's up Robynne
Girl I'll get you the racks
I came so direct
Cause I'm so direct
I'm asking for the number
There is no problem
Call me tonight
I got your back
Girl I'm the night
I'm asking you for the number
You're solving a problem
Call me tonight
Girl I am the night
Hit me up
Hit me up
Then I'll put on the clothes
Then I'll put on the clothes
I'm under the lights
I'm the night
Girl I'm the night
Girl I'm the night
Call me tonight
Call me tonight
(For the number)
You're solving a problem
Call me tonight
Stop you in a pose
Stop you in your tracks
Girl I'll get you
I'll give you a rose
Hey, you're a delight
Hit me up
Hit me up
Then I'll put on the clothes
Then I'll put on the clothes
I'm under the lights
I'm the night
Girl I'm the night
Girl I'm the night
For more infomation >> 🌜 Rogez - The Night (Official Music Video) | Electronic Dance Song 2018 - Duration: 3:13.-------------------------------------------
ScienceCasts: America's Debut in Space: Explorer 1 - Duration: 4:09.
[ MUSIC ]
America's Debut in Space: Explorer 1 - presented by Science@NASA
Sixty years ago, on January 31, 1958, the United States joined the "space race"
with the successful launch of the Explorer 1 satellite. But the event was much more than a rocket launch.
Geopolitically, it leveled the Cold War playing field with the Soviet Union,
which had sent Sputnik into orbit four months earlier.
Scientifically, the launch of Explorer 1 represented the first time humans sent instruments into space,
including a modified Geiger counter for tracking radiation, to collect data and relay it back to Earth.
And historically, it led us into an infinite new frontier
that has yielded data, images, and wonders never before imagined.
University of Iowa physicist James Van Allen, who designed and ran the science experiment on Explorer 1
and experiments on myriad subsequent missions,
called the event "one of the landmarks in the technical and scientific history of the human race."
He continued: "Its instrumentation revealed the existence of radiation belts of the Earth
and opened up a massive new field of scientific exploration in space.
It inspired an entire generation of young men and women in the United States to higher achievement
and propelled the Western world into the space age."
Jim Green, NASA's Planetary Science Director, was among those who were inspired,
as a student and protégé of Van Allen's at Iowa.
"Dr. Van Allen was a pioneer of the space age, and the results from his Explorer 1 instrument
marked the birth of space science. The discovery of the radiation belts encircling the Earth
was a game changer for space exploration. Space was no longer thought to be empty,
and for that the man and the mission will long be remembered."
Spacecraft en route to Earth orbit or deep space must dash through the Van Allen belts,
donut-shaped regions of charged particles trapped by Earth's magnetic field.
The high-energy particles can batter spacecraft and even interfere with onboard instruments.
To ensure the safety and health of astronauts and space science missions,
scientists have been uncovering vital information about the radiation belts ever since Explorer 1 discovered them.
In a speech at Cornell University on March 3, 1965, then-NASA Administrator James Webb
explained the critical importance of success in the vast new horizon of space:
"...the mastery of a new environment, or of a major new technology,
or the combination of the two as we now see in space, has always in the past had
the most profound effects on all nations and on all the peoples of the Earth.
...In the modern world, basic knowledge, applied through technology, is a source of national power."
Former NASA Chief Historian Steven Dick summarized the impact of Explorer 1's launch:
"One could hardly have known what this singular event would set off during the next 60 years.
...Like the railroad and the airplane, spaceflight has impacted society in ways
even the visionaries could not have foreseen, and that we cannot fully fathom even today."
The drive for discovery that enabled the success of Explorer 1 endures today at NASA.
The Agency's innovative spacecraft continue to find new ways
to observe and understand the interconnected systems of our home planet
as well as help us see beyond our solar system into worlds we can explore as one.
For more on amazing advancements in space science, visit science.nasa.gov.
-------------------------------------------
Horrible Things Celebrity Chefs Have Said About Each Other - Duration: 5:15.
The celebrity chef world comes with big palettes - and even bigger mouths.
Some of our favorite celebrity chefs are known for being the meanest critics when it comes
to their peers.
Here's a look at some of the horrible things celeb chefs have said about each other.
Andrew Zimmern and Tyler Florence
In 2009, Bizarre Foods host Andrew Zimmern made zero attempts to hide his disdain for
Tyler Florence.
In a now-deleted blog post, Zimmern said,
"Monday's episode [of Momma's Boys] featured the world's least talented TV chef, Tyler
Florence, once again churning out the questionable cooking advice and leading the ladies through
a menu of the mom's fave recipes.
Watching Florence wolf down the food, stare and ogle every a** that strolled by his cutting
board and play the role of local TV stud was high comedy of the highest order."
In a quick response on Facebook, Florence threw it right back at Zimmern by saying,
"This guy Andrew Zimmern... has decided to diss my life's work because I did, my personal
friend, Ryan Seacrest, a favor and helped him out with his first big television production,
Momma's Boys…
It's bubble gum reality, who cares?
I guess it's hard to have a sense of humor when you're on your 10th take of eating Yak
testicles, smiling to the camera, wondering where your life went wrong.
Mmmmm, delicious!
Go get 'em guys."
Yikes!
Anthony Bourdain about Sandra Lee
According to Anthony Bourdain, Sandra Lee is
"...pure evil… this frightening Hell Spawn of Kathie Lee and Betty Crocker seems on a
mission to kill her fans, one meal at a time."
He's not a fan of her store-bought ingredients, which led to him calling her out during a
Food for Thought Forum in 2009 over her now-infamous Kwanzaa cake.
"Please go home, Google Sandra Lee and Kwanzaa cake.
Then, count how long it's gonna take for your head to explode!"
Several years later, he still wasn't over it.
In his second book, Medium Raw, Bourdain mentions a night at a party where Lee snuck up behind
him and slid her hands up his jacket in a way that even left his then-wife shocked.
She said he had been a "bad boy" and Bourdain says he felt like it was something out of
the movie Cape Fear.
We think it's safe to say he may avoid dissing her cooking style in the future.
Anthony Bourdain and Guy Fieri
It's no secret that Anthony Bourdain has no filter when it comes to speaking his mind
about his colleagues… especially Food Network star Guy Fieri.
Bourdain has made it very clear he's not into Fieri's style, even calling Fieri's Time Square
restaurant a "terror dome."
In 2011 when Fieri's Lamborghini was stolen, Bourdain tweeted that he borrowed it for a
drive and "it smells like Ed Hardy in here."
And in 2015, Bourdain told Atlanta Magazine,
"I sort of feel in a heartfelt way for Guy.
I wonder about him.
He's 52 years old and still rolling around in the flame outfit…What does he do?
How does Guy Fieri de-douche?"
For the record, Fieri was only 46 when Bourdain was ripping him.
Fieri definitely had words to say about Bourdain's behavior, telling GQ Magazine in 2015,
"I know he's definitely gotta have issues, 'cos the average person doesn't behave that
way.
… It's just, what are you doing?
What is your instigation?
You have nothing else to f---ing worry about than if I have bleached hair or not?
I mean, f---."
Martha Stewart and Rachael Ray
In a Nightline interview, Martha Stewart said she thought Rachael Ray was more of an entertainer
than an actual cook, saying,
"Well, to me, she professed that she cannot bake…
She just did a new cookbook which is just a re-edit of a lot of her old recipes.
And that's not good enough for me."
Ray took it in stride and actually agreed with the statements, telling Us Weekly,
"Why would it make me mad?
Her skill set is far beyond mine.
That's simply the reality of it."
Stewart eventually extended an olive branch, saying on her show,
"I truly believe that Rachael has done a terrific job bringing people, many people who would
have never even stepped into the kitchen or made a dish to cook…
I really had a great time being a guest on her show, and it was a lot of fun to have
her on this show making pie with me too.
Come on back, Rachael, anytime you want…"
Alton Brown and Anthony Bourdain
Finally someone challenges Anthony Bourdain.
After vocalizing to People that 252 episodes of his show Good Eats is plenty to make his
resume worthy, Alton Brown went on to question Bourdain's place in the kitchen, asking,
"When was the last time you saw Anthony Bourdain actually cook anything?
…I've spent 14 years cooking my own food on television and I've never seen him cook
a meal."
Brown tempered his remarks with some words of praise - for Bourdain's writing, though,
not his cooking.
"I think that [he] is probably the best writer about food.
I'm jealous of his work.
He pokes a lot of things and that's fine; you have to have critics, issue provocateurs,
so to speak…
I'm a fan, and the few times I've gotten to work with him I enjoyed it immensely."
Gotta love a little friendly competition and trash talk every once in awhile.
Gordon Ramsay and Jamie Oliver
These two have been feuding for what seems like decades.
Ramsay has been all over Oliver, nicknaming him "one-pot wonder" and throwing shade at
him for being too busy to attend his own restaurant opening.
But Oliver gives as good as he gets, telling The Mirror,
"Gordon [...] is deeply jealous and can't quite work out why I do what I do and why
he can't do that.
He is too busy shouting and screaming and making our industry look like a bunch of shouters
and screamers.
He's paid to rant.
He's paid to shower negativity."
The worst part?
Poor James Corden is caught in the middle.
"Where did you seriously learn to cook?"
"Um…
Jamie Oliver, really.
That's the truth" [Laughter]
Thanks for watching!
Click the Mashed icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!
-------------------------------------------
What Scalise wants to hear from Trump's State of the Union - Duration: 5:50.
For more infomation >> What Scalise wants to hear from Trump's State of the Union - Duration: 5:50. -------------------------------------------
A TURMINHA DO SULCA VISITA: E.E.B Caetano Bez Batti - Duration: 4:11.
For more infomation >> A TURMINHA DO SULCA VISITA: E.E.B Caetano Bez Batti - Duration: 4:11. -------------------------------------------
30 Second TV Spot | The Phantom of the Opera on Broadway - Duration: 0:31.
Christine...
Broadway's longest running musical invites you to celebrate 30 haunting years.
The Phantom of the Opera.
Visit phantombroadway.com
-------------------------------------------
Triathlon Training with Sarah True and Matt Dixon's Purple Patch Fitness Pro Team - Duration: 5:51.
- [Man] We are headed to meet up with Sarah True,
current Half Ironman awesome athlete.
(light music)
No chance keeping up with Sarah
or the Purple Patch crew there.
(light music)
So I think that you all deserve a little bit of
housekeeping, I haven't really explained what was
going on, I was in...
(light music)
C'mon, trainiacs, gotta run, gotta run,
gotta run, gotta run!
(grunt)
Step over the invisible line.
We are headed to meet up with Sarah True,
current Half Ironman, awesome athlete.
Mel's driving, I'm terrified.
Sarah's down here in Scottsdale with her hubby, Ben,
and just go out for a swim today,
a little of strength work when we get together with her.
We're going to hopefully kick her ass in some board games
and bring you all along.
Right hand turn.
Right, the right.
[Woman] Oh, other right. (laughs)
- [Man] Yeah, the one that's not straight.
- [Woman] Good morning!
(laughs)
(light pop music)
- [Man] Yeah, I would very proudly say that I have no chance
keeping up with Sarah or the Purple Patch Crew there.
Well, I tell you Scottsdale, Arizona, Tempe,
whatever you want to call it, you are making a play
for me spending some time here.
I like it!
So, I think you all deserve a little bit of housekeeping.
I haven't really explained what was going on.
I was in Tempe for
the Triathlon Business International Conference.
That was Friday, Saturday, Sunday.
Yesterday, we left.
We're now in Scotsdale and yesterday I did a podcast
with Matt Dixon because I wanna start doing
more pro content.
Frankly, I'm tired of seeing myself train.
My form is ugly in the pool,
I'm chubby on the bike, and my run is like a wildebeest
just charging around, so, yeah.
So, what we're doing tomorrow is we're following around
the Purple Patch triathlon team.
That's Matt Dixon's triathlon team.
Got Sam Appleton, who was fourth at Half Ironman World.
He's got Laura Siddall, who was second, Ironman New Zealand.
Sarah Piampiano, who's just winning all over the place
and a whole bunch of elite age-groupers here.
So, we're gonna accompany them for their
four hour brick workout tomorrow
and our old pal, who you might remember from back in Austin,
Sarah True is around.
Actually swam next to her and I might as well
have been a pylon in the lane next to her,
she passed me so quickly.
We're gonna hook up with her while she does a
track workout tomorrow and I realize this is probably
a very short video today but that's because
we spent, after finishing up at the pool there
with Purple Patch and Sarah, doing my own workout,
we have been getting all the camera gear ready
for six, seven hours of shooting, interviewing,
and meeting.
Over the next few weeks, we're gonna have
some day in the life with Sarah, Laura,
Purple Patch Triathlon Team.
It's gonna be fun.
It's gonna be a lot of fun.
One of the reasons why I'm so jazzed up to be spending
some time with Matt Dixon and his team in because
Matt's methodology of training is very appealing.
It's science-based and it's a less is more,
and, specifically for busy amateurs, where essentially
our body can't distinguish between stress at work
or stress just from being a stressed out person
and physical stress caused by training
that he recommends that you have to keep all of that in mind
and that, if you're a very busy, time-crunched person,
you may actually be faster doing a 12 hour training week
as opposed to a 20 hour training week.
He has people in his squad that have qualified for
Kona, gone sub 10 hours on, I think,
a nine hour training week.
So, any time that I can learn fro a guy like that,
I am so it!
And thank you to Matt.
So, everyone, stay tuned.
We got really good stuff coming up.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh!
And, last thing, I know that if you had subscribed
to the nutrition calculator,
right now the calculator's busted.
Seems like every now and again somebody goes in there,
changes the privacy settings,
and screws it up for everyone else.
So, I'm working on that.
I'm gonna fix it.
As soon as it's fixed, everyone that's into that will know.
Alright, now...
Ooh, hey, a dog!
Ooh, a dog with a bad leg.
-------------------------------------------
Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL 847-427-6200 Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL - Duration: 1:16.
Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL. Are you in the market for replacement windows for your home?
Are air leaks and drafts from your windows adding unnecessary costs to
your heating and cooling bills?
Your windows are designed to not only improve your home's appearance,
but to also save money on your heating and cooling costs.
When shopping for replacement windows you have a lot of important
decisions to make..
Luckily, we're here to help!
We're certified local window contractors that can help guide you through
the window purchasing process according to your speci?c style and budget.
We also understand that installation, including anchoring, insulating and
sealing the window to the house to make it airtight and watertight, is as
important as the quality of the window itself.
If it's time to enhance the beauty and value of your home with new
replacement windows, give us a call today for a free, no-pressure in-home
consultation!
-------------------------------------------
How to paint waves (easy) - Step by step - Beginner Painting Tutorial│♥Alexandra ♥ - Duration: 10:11.
For more infomation >> How to paint waves (easy) - Step by step - Beginner Painting Tutorial│♥Alexandra ♥ - Duration: 10:11. -------------------------------------------
LEGO Jurassic World 2018 sets - They're going all out! - Duration: 1:57.
The first batch of LEGO Jurassic World The Fallen Kingdom sets
has been revealed today, and there will be seven System sets.
But, we're also getting three Juniors sets and three Duplo sets,
and the press release also say there will be a Brick Headz set,
books, clothing, and animated videos.
Like wow.
I knew the Jurassic World 2015 sets sold well,
but LEGO is going all out here.
I've never seen a movie get Juniors, Duplo,
and regular System sets at the same time.
Like, even Star Wars, which is LEGO's most popular licensed line,
has never gotten Juniors or Duplo sets.
Kids love dinos and LEGO knows this sells.
Many of the other sets have leaked,
but for the only three revealed today,
the regular system set is a decent $40 set for the value,
I won't get it though, since the Blue the Raptor and the Ken Wheatley and Owen minifigures
all come in the big Mansion set.
Can't wait for that one to be revealed sometime.
The press release actually mentions that more sets
will be shown at the New York Toy Fair.
The Juniors set is good for kids - the unknowing parents will overlook
its fifty price tag which is ridiculous for 150 pieces.
At most, I'd like the set to be 40 bucks,
considering the T-Rex is a big figure,
but it still doesn't look like enough play for a fifty dollar set.
It's a shame since I think the build here is really fun -
it reminds me of this Jurassic Park 3 set which I loved when I was younger,
and the baby dino is so cute.
The Duplo set is adorable, and a good deal for thirty bucks.
It's so weird to see Owen as a Duplo minifigure,
since he's more of an adult character.
I dunno.
Little things to note - I guess Mattel owns that cutesy Jurassic World kids logo,
because LEGO is still using the main logo that will probably scary away Duplo kids,
and my gosh, the packaging is beautiful for regular sets - the corner art is incredible.
Still, it's weird how the logo is just Jurassic World,
and not Jurassic World The Fallen Kingdom.
The back of the box shows how you can build hybrids,
and it also shows which dinos come in which sets -
which is useless in my opinion,
since it doesn't count the two store exclusive sets and the Juniors sets.
Anyways, what do you guys think?
Leave your thoughts in the comments below.
I'll see you guys later.
Peace out.
Bye.
-------------------------------------------
Supergirl Season 3 "Hero's Journey" Trailer (HD) - Duration: 1:05.
Reporting from downtown National City,
it seems Supergirl is just about everywhere these days.
The thing that makes woman strong is that we have the guts to be vulnerable.
Oh my God.
We have the ability to feel the depths of our emotion
and we know that we will walk through it to the other side.
It's here.
The end of days.
This is your purpose.
To fight the devil.
Take your best shot.
I have been trying to get you to embrace your humanity.
But forget that.
Be Kryptonian.
You want justice in the world?
So do I.
But you don't have to be my enemy.
National City is my town.
Supergirl Mondays at 8/7c on The CW.
-------------------------------------------
PULLING OUT OF THE KSI vs JOE WELLER FIGHT PRANK - Duration: 11:36.
For more infomation >> PULLING OUT OF THE KSI vs JOE WELLER FIGHT PRANK - Duration: 11:36. -------------------------------------------
15 Second TV Spot | The Phantom of the Opera on Broadway - Duration: 0:16.
For 30 years one musical has haunted Broadway like no other.
Visit phantombroadway.com
-------------------------------------------
Rapper Insults Trump, The Don Hits Him Back With Historically Lo - Duration: 5:39.
Rapper Insults Trump, The Don Hits Him Back With Historically Low Black Unemployment
When rapper Jay-Z claimed during a CNN panel discussion on racism that President Donald
Trump is a white supremacist and bad for the black community, it wasn�t unusual.
After all, Jay-Z is a prominent Obama supporter and part of a hip-hop community not exactly
known for skewing Republican.
What was unusual was when the president decided to respond to the �4:44� rapper, noting
that African-American unemployment under his administration has �been reported to be
at the LOWEST RATE EVER RECORDED!�
Jay-Z (real name Shaun Carter, husband of Beyonc� for those of you who have been living
under rocks for the past few years) made the remarks on CNN when commentator Van Jones
asked him about the president�s alleged �s***hole countries� remark.
The rapper likened it to when then-Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling was embroiled
in controversy over disparaging remarks about blacks he was recorded making in a phone conversation
with his girlfriend in 2014.
�This is how people talk.
This is how they talk behind closed doors.
It was a moment when Donald Sterling had been exposed as this racist on a private phone
conversation that he was having,� the former Shaun Carter said, according to Breitbart.
Sterling ended up losing the team over the matter.
�It�s like, OK, that�s one way to do it,� Jay-Z continued.
�Another way would have been to have his team and let�s talk about it together and
let�s � maybe some penalties because once you do that, all of the other closet racists
just run back in the hole.
�You haven�t fixed anything.
You have sprayed perfume on the trash can.
What you do, when you do that is the bugs come and you spray something and you create
a superbug because you don�t take care of the problem.
You don�t take the trash out, you keep spraying whatever over it to make it acceptable.
As those things grow, you create a superbug.
And then now we have Donald Trump, the superbug.�
Jones, an Obama staffer who once called Trump�s victory a �whitelash,� did stick up for
the president in a devil�s advocate sort of way: �To give him a little bit of credit
too, he is somebody who is now saying, look, I�m growing � I�m dropping black unemployment.
Black people are doing well under my administration,� Jones said.
�Does he have a point that maybe the Democrats have been giving us good lip service, but
no jobs.
He may say terrible things, but putting money in our pockets.
Does that make him a good leader?�
The rapper was having none of it.
�No because it�s not about money at the end of the day.
Money is not � money doesn�t equate to happiness.
It doesn�t.
That�s missing the whole point.
You treat people like human beings, then � that�s the main point,� Mr. Z responded.
�You can�t treat someone like � it goes back to the whole thing, you going to treat
me really bad and pay me well.
It�s not going to lead to happiness.
It�s going to lead to, again, the same thing.�
That�s an interesting take from someone whose lead single off his last album bragged
�I bought some artwork for one million / Two years later, that s*** worth two million / Few
years later, that s*** worth eight million / I can�t wait to give this s*** to my children.�
A few bars earlier during that financial advice-obsessed song, �The Story of O.J.,� Jay-Z noted,
�You ever wonder why Jewish people own all the property in America?
This how they did it.� And while the rest of Mr. Z�s oeuvre isn�t that overtly anti-Semitic,
it is similarly money- and status-obsessed.
Trump took to his favorite medium, Twitter, to one-up the rapper in epic fashion.
Indeed, under that �super-bug,� the black unemployment rate fell to 6.8 percent in December,
the lowest number in the 45 years it�s been charted.
Yet, according to Jay-Z, this is all a sign of Trump�s emotional deficiencies.
�Somewhere along his lineage, something happened to him,� Jay-Z said.
�Something happened to him and he is in pain and he is expressing it this sort of
way.�
I�ll take Freudian projection for $200, Alex.
In the meantime, if Jay-Z is happy with the lip service paid to him by the Democrats,
he�s wealthy enough to take it.
I think most Americans, much like the president, would take the lower black unemployment index.
And lest Mr. Carter believe what he�s receiving isn�t lip service, I�d like to point out
that the aforementioned Donald Sterling � the racist former owner of the Los Angeles Clippers
� was a Democrat.
What are your thoughts on Jay-Z's remarks?
Scroll down to comment below!
-------------------------------------------
WATCH: Viral Video Surfaces of Anti-Trump Rapper Jay-Z PUNCHING 12-Yr-Old Girl. - Duration: 2:13.
WATCH: Viral Video Surfaces of Anti-Trump Rapper Jay-Z PUNCHING 12-Yr-Old Girl.
Rapper Jay-Z recently appeared on CNN recently, bashing President Donald Trump like it's
his job.
It goes without mention that Jay-Z is a buffoon, known adulterer and drug dealer.
Check this out…
From Fox News:
Jay-Z went home from the Grammys empty-handed, even though he was the most-nominated artist
of the night, capping off a bad weekend for the rapper that included a highly publicized
feud with President Trump.
[…]
Jay-Z began the music awards weekend with an interview on CNN, during which he criticized
Trump's alleged "s—hole countries" remark.
He also said lower unemployment for the country's African-American population is not enough,
when people in power are still mistreating minorities and others.
"It's not about money at the end of the day," he said on "The Van Jones Show."
"Money doesn't equate to happiness.
It doesn't.
That's missing the whole point.
You treat people like human beings.
That's the main point."
The comments sparked a response from Trump, who tweeted: "Somebody please inform Jay-Z
that because of my policies, Black Unemployment has just been reported to be at the LOWEST
RATE EVER RECORDED!"
Trump's response:
An old video has now emerged of Jay-Z punching a little girl.
From Hip Hop DX:
Apparently Jay-Z had a problem with a female in a shocking video that was pulled out of
the archives of the Backstage DVD by HipHopDX.
As of this time I have yet to hear from my numerous contacts at Roc-A-Fella in regards
to Jay-Z's side to this affair.
But, if pictures speak louder than words then Jigga-man has some explaining to do.
The assault looks unprovoked as HOVA walks into what looks like a backstage area of a
concert venue.
DAMN!
This is a big friggin' deal!
Will the mainstream media say anything?
Doubtful.
What do you think about this?
Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe
Top Stories Today.
-------------------------------------------
Why You Need the Hard Times - Duration: 5:08.
JOYCE: SO I AM A VERY FOCUSED, A VERY DETERMINED
PERSON AND IT'S KIND OF A REQUIREMENT FOR WHAT I'M DOING.
BUT IT ALSO PRESENTS A CONSTANT CHALLENGE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS
GETTING INTERRUPTED.
[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]
JOYCE: AND I JUST WANNA THINK.
WHEN I'VE GOT A PLAN OR A GOAL AND ANYONE OR ANYTHING
INTERRUPTS IT OR APPEARS TO BE THROWING IT OFF-COURSE,
I HAVE TO REALLY TRY
WITH A LOT OF PRAYER TO BE PATIENT AND...
SO I'M GONNA TELL YOU A FUNNY STORY.
I WAS ON MY WAY TO DO A CHURCH SERVICE AND IF THERE'S ANYTHING
I CAN'T STAND IT'S TO BE LATE FOR MY OWN STUFF.
[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]
JOYCE: I MEAN, WHEN IT STARTS, I WANT
TO BE RIGHT OVER THERE, PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT'S GOING ON
BECAUSE I'M MISS RESPONSIBLE.
IT'S MY DEAL.
I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT IT ALL GOES RIGHT.
WE GOT LOTS OF GOOD PEOPLE BUT I STILL WANNA BE THERE.
AND OH, YOU SHOULD SEE IF I GET STUCK IN A TRAFFIC JAM.
IT'S JUST LIKE...
NOW, YOU KNOW, I'VE--I HAVE SOME SELF-CONTROL
BUT IT'S, LIKE, IT'S A CHALLENGE.
HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT?
THERE'S CERTAIN SITUATIONS THAT ARE JUST MORE CHALLENGING FOR
YOU THAN OTHERS.
WELL, SEE, THOSE ARE THE ONES WE WANT TO ATTACK WITH GOD
AND--'CAUSE YOU TAKE GROUND ONE STEP AT A TIME, OKAY?
I'M REALLY PRETTY PATIENT WITH GOD NOW.
I'M NOT, I MEAN, 'CAUSE I'VE KIND OF FIGURED OUT, I'M NOT
GONNA MAKE HIM HURRY.
SO I MEAN, I'M OKAY WITH THAT.
YOU KNOW, IF HE GIVES ME WHAT I WANT IN A WEEK, THAT'S FINE.
AND IF HE GIVES IT TO ME IN 25 YEARS, THAT HAS TO BE FINE
BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT GONNA MAKE GOD HURRY SO I'VE JUST--I'VE
KIND OF CHILLED OUT WITH THAT ONE.
BUT I STILL KINDA TRY TO CONTROL OTHER STUFF SOMETIMES.
SO WE'RE ON OUR WAY TO THIS CHURCH SERVICE.
WE'VE GOTTA PASS THESE TRAIN TRACKS.
WELL, THE TRAIN THINGY, BOARD THING, IS DOWN AND THE LIGHTS
ARE FLASHING AND NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN,
NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN.
AND THE TRAFFIC'S BACKING UP, BACKING UP, BACKING UP.
NOW PEOPLE START TURNING ROUND AND GOING THE OTHER DIRECTION,
TURNING--SO OBVIOUSLY, SOMETHING WAS WRONG AND THE THING WAS DOWN
AND THERE WAS NO TRAIN.
SO WE FINALLY DID A U-TURN AND SO NOW WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO TAKE
THIS DETOUR AND GO THROUGH ALL THESE STREETS WE'RE NOT EVEN
SURE ABOUT AND I'M, LIKE, I'M GONNA BE LATE.
I DON'T WANNA BE LATE.
AND SO DAVE IS VERY GENEROUS IN HIS DRIVING IN THAT HE USUALLY
LETS A LOT OF PEOPLE IN.
[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]
JOYCE: SO WE'RE DRIVING.
I'M, LIKE, WANTING TO GET THERE AND I SEE THIS CAR INCHING OUT
OF THIS SIDE STREET AND DAVE STARTED SLOWING DOWN.
AND OUT OF MY MOUTH COMES, "DAVE, THIS IS NO TIME TO BE
NICE."
[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]
JOYCE: HE SAID, "NO, WE DON'T WANNA BE NICE, WE'RE ON
OUR WAY TO CHURCH.
THAT WOULD NOT BE A GOOD THING TO BE NICE ON YOUR WAY
TO CHURCH."
[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]
JOYCE: AND IT WAS SO FUNNY, SO FUNNY.
SO I WANNA BE WHO I AM.
I LOVE MY PERSONALITY.
I LOVE WHAT I'M DOING.
I LOVE MY AGGRESSIVE NATURE.
SO THAT MEANS THAT I'M GONNA JUST--
[AUDIENCE APPLAUDING]
JOYCE: KEEP WORKING WITH GOD.
AND SEE, THE GOOD NEWS IS, IS I KNOW HE LOVES ME ANYWAY.
I'M NOT GONNA GO TO HEAVEN BECAUSE I'M PATIENT BUT I WANT
TO BE FULLY PATIENT BECAUSE HERE COMES THE PAYOFF.
ARE YOU READY FOR THIS?
AUDIENCE: YEAH!
JOYCE: YEAH, YOU'RE READY.
YOU WANT THIS, DON'T YOU?
AUDIENCE: YES!
JOYCE: OH MY GOSH.
JAMES 1:2 THROUGH 4, "CONSIDER IT WHOLLY JOYFUL,
MY BRETHREN, WHENEVER YOU'RE ENVELOPED IN OR
ENCOUNTER TRIALS OF ANY SORT OR FALL INTO VARIOUS TEMPTATIONS."
NOW, YOU KNOW, REALLY THAT'S A GREAT SCRIPTURE BUT NOBODY
REALLY DOES THAT.
I MEAN, IT'S LIKE DID YOU NOTICE HOW QUIET YOU WERE WHEN I
STARTED READING THAT?
NOBODY CHEERED.
NOBODY CLAPPED FOR THIS.
"CONSIDER IT JOYFUL WHEN YOU'RE IN ALL KINDS OF TESTS
AND TEMPTATIONS AND TRIALS."
WELL, YOU CAN'T BE JOYFUL ABOUT THE TRIAL BUT WHAT WE'RE
SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO DO IS TO LOOK BY FAITH BEYOND WHAT WE'RE
GOING THROUGH TO WHAT IT'S GOING TO DO FOR US SPIRITUALLY.
[AUDIENCE CHEERING]
JOYCE: 'CAUSE, SEE, YOU HAVE TO HAVE
THE HARD TIMES TO LEARN TO CONTROL THE SOUL.
[AUDIENCE APPLAUDING]
-------------------------------------------
Honda Driver-Assistive Technologies: Blind Spot Information System - Duration: 0:14.
This is the Blind Spot Information System.
Now available or standard on most Honda vehicles.
-------------------------------------------
WH hints at 'eye-opening' statement on North Korea in SOTU - Duration: 6:07.
For more infomation >> WH hints at 'eye-opening' statement on North Korea in SOTU - Duration: 6:07. -------------------------------------------
SON DAKİKA | TRANSFER | Galatasaray Ninja Lakaplı Sol Bek Yuto Nagatomo'yu İnter'den Kiraladı - Duration: 14:10.
For more infomation >> SON DAKİKA | TRANSFER | Galatasaray Ninja Lakaplı Sol Bek Yuto Nagatomo'yu İnter'den Kiraladı - Duration: 14:10. -------------------------------------------
How To Use A Laser Cutter - Lightblade Learning Lab 39 Photo Engraving on Anodised Aluminium Pt 1 - Duration: 31:04.
Well welcome to another Lightblade learning la.
Today we're going to carry on with the theme that we started last time and that
is, we're going to start off by looking at damage to materials and a quick
examination of this concept that I tried to explain to you last time, about damage
threshold. Now you may remember this very simple little test pattern, we used this when
we were developing speeds for engraving onto wood and card or
organic materials. Now we're going to use this same pattern again today because at
254 pixels per inch it gives us a point 1 dot and a point 1 space along the
bottom here and it gives us an opportunity to work out just what size
dots we're getting. Now with paper and card we found that we couldn't get much
better than about 0.15 dot size and the dot size was the thing that basically
limited us to the speed and the resolution of picture that we could work
with. I've got some red paper here, I'm going to use this as a starting point so
the first thing we need to do is to set the focus to the to the correct height, 5,
6, 7, there we go so we're going to run this at 13% Max and Min power because
13% is in that pre-ionization zone before the tube gets fully
powered-up. Now that gives us a very high frequency, very high power
pulses and we can do quite a lot of damage at this low power.
We're running this at 250 millimetres a second, but the dots are showing that
because they are tending to run into each other, they're not very clear,
they're probably nearly 0.2 sausages by 0.10 ~ 0.15 maybe now the problem is if
I slow it down to make the sausages correct I shall probably start burning
a hole through the paper. Can I reduce the power a little bit more? Well we'll
try, I could probably take it down as low as maybe 9% for this machine.
Hardly any marks and this also demonstrates just how sensitive the
power setting is at this very low range. We've eventually got a perfect set of
dots; at 9.5% max and min power and 120 millimeters a second. So we've had to
slow it down to get the right amount of power to give us a good shaped dot.
What we've done, we've found the damage threshold, the perfect damage threshold
for this particular piece of material, a piece of finished paper. Around the
outside here, we're not producing burn marks we're actually producing white
marks and what we're really doing is pulling the dye out of the paper.
But when we look carefully under the microscope you'll see that we're
actually still burning holes through the paper. So what we've now got here is a
piece of white card, which has got quite a lot of china clay in it and we'll just
see what those same settings of 9.5% can do on this piece of paper and the answer
is not very much. Let's try 10%, now 10% is not bad....
Okay, so now here we have a piece of black perspex and I shall just have to just set the focus
up again and we're using black perspex because it will show up the
marks a little bit better. So we'll run the ten and a half percent at 120
millimeters a second and see what damage we can do. Yeah, we can do something, we
shall see that under the microscope so that's the same damage threshold as
white card two completely different materials with the same damage threshold.
Now would you have believed that, this rather stringent dot test that I use
will tell us the sort of speeds and feats (power) that we can use for doing dot
pictures. Now with some of those materials it may well be that we can run
at a slightly faster speed but the problem is we're running at a slow speed
to get perfect dots but we're not getting a very good colour, we're not
getting a very good burn. If we put the power up, we shall make the dots bigger
and what we should be doing if you remember back to our last session, the
brown halo around the hole is the thing that we shall be seeing as our dot. Not
the actual dot, the powerful dot itself. So that's why there isn't too much control
over the dot size as we increase the power. We've got to deal with another
problem of somehow decreasing the power so that we don't burn a hole, but we do
produce a brown mark. So it all comes back to this thing about energy density
and time that we talked about last time. Remember when we were burning the wood
in an unfocused beam, how it took a long time to burn, but we were able to put a
mark on the surface of the wood with very low unfocused power. But once we
took it to the other side of the lens all of a sudden that same power was able
to burst through. So you've got to keep those those facts in mind, power density
and the time that you allow the high density mark to sit in one
place or you decrease the density of that mark and that's something we shall
have to play with in a future session. The next thing that I want to look at, it's
the main part of today's session is anodised aluminium. I suspect that some
of you guys won't really understand what anodised aluminium is. You'll have heard
of it and you will recognize it when you see it because understanding about
anodised aluminium is going to help you understand how and why we damage it.
Okay, now what I've got here is a piece of ordinary aluminium, this is a piece of
aluminium extruded bar and as you can see the surface finish on it is not
particularly good. It's raw aluminium and on the other side I've polished it. Now
if I put that in front of the laser beam I should get about 98% of the beam
bouncing back at me it will act just like a mirror. Polishing the surface has
a small effect and it may well increase the reflectivity by 1% up to 99%. Now I
say that sounds a really strange property because aluminium is a very
good transmitter of heat what we've got to remember is and I keep reinforcing this,
the laser beam itself is not hot. It's only when the laser beam stimulates the
atoms in this surface that we get an energy transfer. If we get reflection off
the surface there is no heating effect. Well that's why you wouldn't want to use
naked aluminium for any of the parts inside this machine. My other machine
over there for example first came to me with an aluminium bed. The first thing I
did was to cover it with a piece of mild steel which has only got a 60%
reflectivity and as it reflects it causes the Rays to diverge and the
energy density gets dissipated. Anodising is a process that you can put onto this
material you dip this into a bath with some chemicals and some electrical
contacts and it will convert the surface of this material into a
nonmetallic oxide. If you could imagine sprinkling salt on the surface granular,
well that's what this surface gets converted into it's not loose salt that
you can shake off obviously but it's a granular surface that this metal gets
converted to by a chemical reaction. Bear in mind this granular structure that's
on the surface is non metallic it is no longer aluminium it's an aluminium oxide.
Now what is aluminium oxide? Well you can see aluminium oxide in sandpaper or
emery paper or things like that, it's a very very hard material it's used for
grinding wheels in industry. So the surface of this material has now been
converted into a very hard material, but it's got an open pore structure. They dip
this product into a sealant which seals up
all the pores and stops the outside atmosphere and anything else from going
through the pores and attacking the raw aluminium that's still underneath. Okay
now that's a two-stage anodising process, you can go for a three-stage anodising
process and that's what this piece of material has been through. After the
first stage of oxidation on the surface, instead of dipping it into a clear
sealant, what they've done is they're dropped this into a bath of dye. You can
get all sorts of colored anodized aluminium but it's only the dye that
they do for the second operation that's giving the anodised aluminium its colour
and then after the dye has gone into the surface and sat between all the granules
they then put the sealing coat on top so now we've got a colored anodized
aluminium product. We're not going to burn through the very hard oxide coating,
we're just going to put enough heat into it to evaporate the dye that's in the
product so this is yet another damage mechanism, we're not attempting to damage
the material. We want just enough energy to evaporate the dye so this might be
quite a delicate balancing operation to get the dye out without damaging the
material. Now until I had these little sample squares made, so that I could do
some demonstrations for you guys. The only product that I had that was
anodized was a piece of channel section and this has got gold anodise on it, but
this has been industrially produced in bulk and I suggest that probably this is
a very very thin anodizing process that's taking place in here. Whereas this
has been done by a small plating company where they specialize in high-quality
plating rather than let's call it high-volume industrial
plating. We will test this and see whether this performs differently to
this. Okay, so here we've got our piece of black acrylic, we were in the pre-
ionization region and we were able to damage this at 10.5% power .10.5% power
is down at probably something like about 3 or 4 watts
coming out onto the job. So it was a very small amount of power but running at
slow speed that we were able to damage this, so it's the
apportionment of power over time that gives us damage to a product and we're
gonna start off with those same numbers on this piece of gold anodizing and see
what sort of results we get. Well it's interesting we've got some damage.
I'm going to run the same test on this black anodize because I've got a half a
suspicion that I shall not be able to damage this at these settings.
Well my half a suspicion is wrong, it's actually done quite a nice job so that's
at 10.5% / 120 millimetres a second they are really very clean little dots in
fact I would say the gold anodizing needs more power to burn through. Okay so
now I'm going to run 120 millimetres a second at 13%. It's the upper of those
two sets they don't look any different just because we've increased the power,
we've more than doubled the power. We also run a test on the gold anodizing at 120
millimetres a second and 13% power. Well they're also now beginning to look very
nice between these two products there's something in common.... the white background.
We're just drawing the dye out of the material and we're leaving the white
oxidised surface behind, that's the key to this process so we're down at very
very low powers at the moment. I'm just going to carry on with the black one,
because it's the black one that I want to demonstrate. We'll just set this to
seven millimeters, eight, seven, click, done!
I'm sorry I don't use the autofocus on this machine because it is so much
quicker to set it by hand. Now I'm going to try something really silly and that
is we're going to double the speed so we've found the threshold where it
looked very very good and we found that at 13%.
And 13% is about as high as this machine works in its pre-ionisation mode,
its high-frequency pulsing and that's why we're getting I think quite good
resolution on these dots. Right we've now gone to 250 millimeters a second same power
13%
and I think you can see we're beginning to lose it a little bit, we've lost the
centre line of dots. The dots are actually still quite nice dots but
they're not as dark as they were in this one, because we're not allowing quite
enough time for the dots to form properly at 250 millimeters a
second. We've doubled the speed, we've basically allowed half the amount of
time. At 13% we're running at about 12 watts, so after we take let's just say we
take 20% off we're down to probably about 9 or 10 watts here. So let's double
that up to 18 or 20 watts which means we need maybe 30 watts coming out of the
tube. So we need to go up to about 22 or 23 percent power. In other words what
we're doing, we've halved the amount of time which means we halved the amount of
power that we're putting into every dot. So if we double the power we should be
back to where we were here. And there we go, we've gone from that to that
and now we've doubled the power but also doubled to speed we're back to this and
maybe a little bit better. Those blocked dots there look as though they may well
have merged, we've got a lovely row of dots along the centre and yes what we've
got here now we've got dots that are more or less touching. So they're
sausages, they're little oval shape pieces which are just about touching so
they're about 0.15 or 0.12 wide and almost maybe 0.19 long but we are
running at 250 millimeters a second. As well as trying to demonstrate what the
damage threshold for materials is, because this is a very special type of
engraving material. What the limits are that we can go to, we can certainly go to
250 millimeters a second and probably get a reasonable picture. This is a
resolution of 250 pixels per inch as well, 254 to be exact so we're already
able to go probably two times faster with twice the resolution than we could
do with wood or with card. I have heard that you can actually run at a thousand
pixels per inch and get good quality pictures, now that's quite a long way to
go at the moment. A thousand pixels per inch. I've developed a thousand pixels
per inch pattern here that we can run, to see whether we can
succeed in getting any sort of results for a thousand pixels per inch because
that would be some mighty resolution if we could, we'd be able to produce almost
perfect photographic representations on black anodized surfaces. Because the
surface is black and the background is white, whereas when we do it with paper
we've got brown, various types of brown whereas here we've only got two colours.
We know we've only got two colours to start with black and white. We're going
to run this thousand pixels per inch test at the ideal speed that we found
when we were running the 250 pixel test ie 13% power and a hundred twenty
millimetres a second. So we'll use it as our starting point.
I'm actually staggered to say that we do look as though we've got individual
pixels running along there, but whether there is I think it's a hundred pixels
that I had along there we'd have to count them underneath the microscope
because I certainly can't do it with my, with my little eye glass here. Let's
change the speed up to 240 and let's double the power up to 23%.
There's virtually nothing that I can pick out by way of an individual pixel,
that probably is because we are now running the power in solid beam mode ie
the beam is on all the time and it takes a finite amount of time for the beam to
die off and come back on again. Whereas when we were doing this, at 13% the
beam was switching on and off incredibly quickly and it was probably punching
these. If I got it synchronised correctly it would be punching these at the same
speed as the dots were passing by. What I'm going to do now is something which
would not normally be done for photo engraving. Now I'm going to go into
RDWorks which is connected up to the Machine and press the read button across
the bottom there and make sure that I'm reading into this table here what's
actually in the machine. So I've got the Machine settings here now available to
me on this screen. I'm now going to look down these settings and somewhere I
should find a scanning mode and there it is there, look, scan mode / common mode
and this strange word underneath Facula size 50 to 99 percent. Change from
common mode and I get a choice here I get this thing called special mode. I'm
going to set the Facula size to 50% and I'll explain what I'm doing
shortly, an engraving factor hundred. So now I've got to write that information
back to the machine, which I've now done. So now I've set the Machine up into
something called special mode and let's go and see what effect it has on my
results. Now I've not changed anything with the settings and previously we had
23 percent power 230 millimeters a second and we were producing a solid
block, let's see what happens now. We've got lots of individual dots there but
I'm not so sure we've got as many dots, so what we can do we can push the power
up a little bit. Let's go from 23% to 50% special mode.
Well I would say we have not got individual pixels anymore
we've got something which are sort of pixely you can see that there are blobs
that are joining together so you know it may well work. We're currently at 230
millilitres a second and 50% power
now that is quite phenomenal
let's be silly shall we and drive it up to 400 millimeters a second and see what we
get. Now we're being really silly, 400 millimeters a second and 70% power.
Now we're nearly back to seeing individual pixels there, not quite but
hey we've got the machine running flat out. Okay we're going to run that test
again and I want you to look what's happening to the ammeter,
now 70% power should be somewhere up here at about 22 milliamps. What on earth is
going on? Well remember that we got some half-decent results when we were running
down at 13% power, we got nice crisp dots provided we didn't run too fast, but
basically what happens is as the tube starts up it will go through this phase
of high-frequency impact Engraving pre ionization before it settles down to a
constant current. Now it will do this every time we start the tube up. So if if
we're running at 40%, 40% power will be this but for the first few milliseconds
or microseconds after we turn the tube on it will go through this phase of high
frequency before it settles down to a stable current. Now provided we use the
Machine at very very low currents we can keep it in this region and at 13% I was
running it like this so the current never managed to settle down throughout
my test it was continuously going up and down. So the dots didn't have a chance to
burn into each other because there was only little pulses of power there all
the time. The photograph that we're going to work with is going to be broken down
into black pixels on a white background and what happens is every pixel that
appears black and sometimes it's a group of pixels rather than a single pixel. The
beam will switch on and the current will flow and the beam will switch off when
it gets to the end of a pixel or a block of pixels and it will stop and then it
will switch back on again and the current will flow. There's no current
flowing when the beam is switched off so it's only when the beam is switched on
that the current flows and it flows continuously.
When we look at the blocks of pixels under the microscope
we'll find that the current has had a chance to build up and burn through
whereas when we get a single pixel its hardly had a chance to reach
maximum power before it switches off and that's the balance point that we had to
achieve when we were burning Brown pixels onto wood or paper. I've now set
the machine into a special mode and I've done a trace for you of power which is
the red line and the switching on and off which is the blue line. As you can see, there
is my pattern that top line are the continuous lines and they match up with
this pattern under normal circumstances what you'd see is you'd see the signal
switching on here, off because it's blank then back on off on off on off, but with
special mode it's broken up into 20,000 Hertz signals. I've set the Fukuda to 50%
so that means the signal is only on for 50% of the time so I've divided the
power effectively by 2 but in reality it's a lot less than that because I
don't think the actual physics of the machine through the power supply can
respond that quickly, but that's what the machine is trying to do. It's trying to
break these continuous signals into smaller pieces.
These are single dots, sometimes we've got signals which break up the dot is on
long enough to produce like 2 or 3 little signals and then at other times
there's not enough for it to only do 1 pulse 2 pulses one and a half one two
one three you know we're getting a strange pattern
along here an aliaising pattern basically where the pulsing does not
coincide with the pixels. We're likely to get varying colours on these pixels
because we haven't got exactly the same signal on each one now I haven't got the
single dots to match up because I've expanded the scale so that you can
basically see what's happening. Look we've got a dot a dot a dot a dot and a
bit, that dot is broken into two, that dot is broken into two, a dot, a dot, something
funny going on there you know we've got some randomness taking place along here.
So we've got again inconsistency in the power signal for single dots. Now if I
need more colour in my dots I can't increase the powe,r I've got to
decrease the speed to increase the time per dot by decreasing the speed we
shall allow more power per unit of time to burn our dots.
I hope I'm getting the message over to you about this relationship between
power and time instantaneous amount of energy in a spot to do damage. I've
already done quite a lot of experimental work on my other machine over there if
you want to go to my RDWorks Learning Lab YouTube channel you'll find
information, detailed information about the experimentation that I went through,
but I've had to go through a similar test procedure on this machine to make
sure that this machine is going to perform the same as my other machine
over there and it looks as though this machine may well perform better than the
other machine over there. That's 400 pixels per inch
240 speed 50/50 power this one is 600 pixels per inch 240 speed 50/50 power and
this one is a thousand pixels per inch it was still done at 240 millimeters a
second but it was 40% power. Now however you look at that that's pretty damned
amazing, so in the next session I plan to go through the preparation of a
photograph to produce a thousand PPI image. It's not this one
but it'll be a different image and we'll test out how well it works on this
machine now that we've got a set of test parameters which promised to give us a
thousand pixels per inch.....
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét