Thứ Ba, 30 tháng 5, 2017

Waching daily May 30 2017

5 Spiritual Boundaries To Push Every Day

BY GOSTICA

1 � How Efficiently You Work

Joyful.

Excited.

Motivated.

What do you think about when you hear the words �work efficiently�?

The path of your dreams?

Another day of drudgery?

You decide which is true.

I choose the path of my dreams.

You have 15 to 17 waking hours per day.

Fill them with as much excitement and motivation as you possibly can.

You do this with the help of 3 rules:

Make It a Learning Experience All work experiences can be learning experiences.

You can learn to master skills.

You can learn to master yourself.

Learn to master both.

Align with Your Dreams Align your learning goals with your biggest

dream.

Find what skills you can learn, and what you can learn about yourself, that will help you

the most in reaching your dreams.

Make It a Flow Experience

Time disappears.

Your hands and your mind move faster than what is reasonably possible.

You feel both inner peace and excitement.

There is just you and the task.

You have felt this way many times before.

You can feel this way while doing anything.

The gateway to flow is intense focus: Goal-directed focus on the edge of your current skill level

2 � How Much Gratitude You Feel

Gratitude is happiness.

Gratitude is a habit.

Happiness is a habit.

If you throw a rock into the air, it falls down again.

If I jump into the air, I fall down again.

I am a rock.

Who cares about logic?

Happiness is at least 50% habit.

That is why it is so important to push your boundaries for gratitude every day.

3 � How Good You Make Others Feel

�Man is by nature a social animal.� � Aristotle

Are you waiting for others to make you happy?

You fool!

Make other�s happy and you will see your own happiness shine back at you.

4 � Your Level of Unconditional Self-Love

When do you allow yourself to be happy?

How high have you set the bar?

Fuck the bar!

You are always worthy of self-love.

Your love for yourself should be like a large sun.

Shining brightly for billions of years and ending in a supernova.

Your conditions for self-love is messing you up.

You deny parts of yourself.

You distort reality.

Unconditional self-love is a decision you make in every moment.

Choose to love yourself now.

There is no later.

5 � Your Presence in This Everlasting Moment

Presence is everything.

Presence is now.

You are flowing at work.

You feel gratitude.

You see other people and satisfy their needs.

You love yourself with burning intensity.

For more infomation >> 5 Spiritual Boundaries To Push Every Day - Duration: 4:39.

-------------------------------------------

Tử vi ngày 31 tháng 5 năm 2017 của 12 con giáp: Con giáp nào có sự nghiệp hanh thông nhất - Duration: 10:59.

For more infomation >> Tử vi ngày 31 tháng 5 năm 2017 của 12 con giáp: Con giáp nào có sự nghiệp hanh thông nhất - Duration: 10:59.

-------------------------------------------

Family Fun Vacation! Mouse Poppy And Branch Vacation vs Hand Burned New Episode Nursery Rhymes - Duration: 2:09.

Thank you for watching

Please help me !!! Subscribe + 20.000 ►►► Mouse Family

For more infomation >> Family Fun Vacation! Mouse Poppy And Branch Vacation vs Hand Burned New Episode Nursery Rhymes - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

ANATOMY OF A FALSE FLAG ATTACK IN THE DIGITAL AGE - Duration: 6:29.

ANATOMY OF A FALSE FLAG ATTACK IN THE DIGITAL AGE

False Flag attacks are SO confusing!

Are they real, are they FAKE? Were there any victims? And why are television and media

reports SO coordinated, ubiquitous and unanimous as to the culprits.

Is what I saw on TV real or was it computer graphics? Were those real victims being run

over by the madman in the car, or were they stunt men performing their craft? Why are

the outcomes so predictable?

More draconian laws, more police and surveillance, bigger budgets for law enforcement and intelligence

operations � all to keep us safer, even though all the existing precautions didn�t

seem to help. How come our Intelligence guys seem to have nearly always have the perpetrator

in their clutches � but �let him go�? Hmm.

And why is there so much evidence of FILM CREWS recording CRISIS ACTORS being attended

to by emergency personnel at �terrorist events� in the weeks and months leading

up to what we are told are bona fide terrorist attacks?

Are these events PRE-RECORDED for public consumption, to push political and/or military objectives?

Like going to war in the Middle East.

Many online citizen journalists are already calling the recent Manchester Arena Bombing

a False Flag hoax. Who�s right? The trusted government or the skeptical citizens? It�s

really hard to tell, but we can have our suspicions.

Staged in May of 2016, a year earlier, shows a mock terrorist attack in Manchester, England.

And the purpose of this digital recording is�. ??

No, I couldn�t think of any logical reason either!

Anyway, the British Prime Minister, Therese May has already put 5,000 combat troops on

the streets of the UK, to keep the public safe!! That didn�t take long, did it.

These are difficult issues to grasp for We the People. Surely this must be just another

Conspiracy Theory, right?

Wrong! Here�s a list of recent False Flag attacks ADMITTED TO by various governments

around the world. Fascinating and ILLUMINATING.

But what exactly is a False Flag Attack?

From Wikipedia:

�The contemporary term false flag describes covert operations that are designed to deceive

in such a way that activities appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups,

or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.�

Well I guess if there is an actual definition for False Flags, one should at least consider

the proposition that they exist.

Who would have the motive, means and ability to conduct such nefarious activities? Probably

someone with unlimited resources and nothing better to do with their time. That would leave

only a State Actor, also known as �Your Friendly Government�.

Malcolm Fraser (remember him) seemed to have strong opinions on exactly what governments

will do when push comes to shove and their �political interests� are threatened.

An interview with Mr.Fraser, recorded in October, 2014, courtesy our illustrious editor, Dee

McLachlan, tells us everything we need to know on the topic of False Flags.

�it demonstrates that a major power,(like Australia), when it believes its� vital

interests are involved, will sacrifice any number of its� own people�

An ex-Prime Minister telling us that our government can�t be trusted NOT to sacrifice us if

they need to???

OUCH!!!

Unfortunately, Mr. Fraser passed away suddenly in March, 2016.

This brings me back to last August, 2016 and the �Disaster Drill� conducted in Sydney,

near Darling Harbour.

What happened to all the film footage recorded by the Channel 7 Chopper, which hovered over

the Disaster Drill for ages. There were plenty of iconic shots of the Sydney Harbour Bridge

and the Opera House � for product location and recognition. No doubt camera crews were

on the ground filming the total chaos unfolding, while hundreds of volunteers were being attended

to by emergency personnel. Blood-soaked victims were ferried away by fleets of ambulances,

crying relatives gave heartfelt interviews to waiting journos and camera crews, and there

were machine-gun toting SWAT teams with black masks looking fierce and menacing� you get

the drill.

They MAY already have all the footage needed to stage a False Flag attack in Sydney.

But surely they wouldn�t dare, would they??

If they try to pull off another False Flag in Sydney, PLEASE DON�T BUY INTO IT!!

Tell them to �FALSE FLAG OFF!!�

SEE SHORT VIDEO CLIP. THE LINK IS BELOW

IN OUR DESCRIPTION.

For more infomation >> ANATOMY OF A FALSE FLAG ATTACK IN THE DIGITAL AGE - Duration: 6:29.

-------------------------------------------

Accounting For Beginners #24 / Does The Transaction Increase Assets / Accounting Basics - Duration: 10:02.

yo yo yo what's good CPA strength

stronger CPA in the state of Florida

look at the boy go I'm jumping out the

roof frame alright enough of this I kind

of for beginners the classic series the

classic series of the classic series

accounting for beginners 24 does the

transaction increase assets I don't know

does the transaction increase the assets

let's figure this out

together there's this was a viewer

question there's three or four parts to

it we're just going to take every part

so let's just go through and get her

then look at the end it's gonna be got

her done you know what I feel in his hat

ripping up Florida doe Florida one of

the craziest mugs live I think might be

the Sun or the transient nature I don't

know

I'm forty I've lived in South Florida

for 2509 four years you know I'm just a

mess just a mess I'm the strongest CPA

in Florida also the messiest the hot and

I'm a hot mess - boy mmm long hair don't

care well so would i Dan cuz I got

shredded AF alright let's get on to this

now junk up ye so DC a blur would be

your first thing to know you put on your

paper I would write out

I'll write out in full I would at first

just put I put dc8 learn okay that's the

first step then the next step is

remembering what the heck they stand for

so once you have this you're going to be

good this might take you a minute your

first day and you might not remember

what all these are for what all these

letters even mean so then you look at

your review and trust me if you write

this down every morning for a month

straight

you will have it in your head forever

it'll be burning your head forever

that's what I want you to do on your

scratch piece paper on your test while

you're doing your homework your test

whatever now I'll show you what I will

do okay I'm going to read does the

transaction increase assets okay so okay

it's a question give me the transaction

boy borrowed cash on a note payable

50,000 all right so that's a transaction

we're going to have a journal entry and

this goes kind of perfectly into

yesterday's video about cash we have

cash here we have a question about the

journal entry there's two separate parts

to the journal entry so I'm going to

show you how I would do it meaning like

I want to do a journal entry I don't

know would you know how to do a journal

entry at this point I hope so because

every transaction it has a journal entry

and then we can figure out if this

journal entry those transaction

increases assets or not I just put a

line through that's for me I know debits

over here

I know credits over here let's see what

we got first things first is the Izzard

is there any cash in here borrowed cash

okay okay okay

borrowed cash I see cash ding ding ding

ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding

ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding

ding ding cash cash cash cash cash cash

cash cash cash are we getting more cash

first of all we have cash Bing Bing Bing

Bing Bing we have some cash boy yeah

that's what's up we know cash is an

asset we know these are in positive

forms here we borrowed cash so I

borrowed another thing with accounting

there's no feelings

oh you borrowed money and you have you

owe them a lot of money and you're going

to pay interest on feel good about no

one gives us don't cares ok we didn't

ask that that's how the question we're

is that's not a journal entries there's

no feelings in journal entry was it a

good move was it a bad mood I feel good

about it do I not figure out I got

hoodwink don't matter leave your

feelings out of this borrowed money

borrowed so here's what I do I borrowed

now I know this thinks is fifty thousand

dollars on a note payable whatever I'd

like to say I borrowed five dollars from

my best friend do I have to have more

money or less money borrowing I have

more money okay I have more money we

have cash going up we borrowed cash cash

is going up we see we know cash is an

asset

DCL or these are in positive side so if

it's going up cash is going up it's a

debit so we have cash going up so we're

going to put cash in a debit here see

this is why this is my line this is my

debit and credit line my debit card so

we got cash over here

how much cash should I give boy 50k 50k

how much I got 50,000 cash cash is an

asset on a note payable or note payable

all right I don't know anything I don't

know what to know payable is I don't

know anything okay wholly lost well you

know from other other videos you've

watched of mine I know you've watched a

bunch of mine thank you well you're

welcome

I don't even know anyways you know these

always have to equal every time every

time every time every time every time

Baga cash 50,000 borrowed cash unknown

payable so here's the here's one half of

the transaction here's the other half

you're just beginning you don't really

know anything there's the cash it has to

equal equal equal so I'm just going to

even put in 50,000

here on the credit side we've got our

category its cash we've got the amount

$50,000 we've already got our credit we

got the route $50,000 now the only thing

we need is to figure out what box that

our credit is in all right note payable

I don't know what to pay I don't know

what I know payable is I've said before

that liability is payables note payable

note payable look I don't know anything

but I know that the liabilities are

payable so I'm just going to put note

payable over here so that is the journal

entry note here is your note here so you

got to think of what's actually going on

I'm I'm getting this is the 50k oh thank

you now you gotta remember you know

nothing's free in this world absolutely

nothing is free you just gave me 50k

what am I giving you a note payable

let's write this down a note payable so

no here's my note here so obviously I'm

getting fronted some money I owe you the

money you know I'm getting fronted I owe

you a note here I will pay CPA strength

we'll pay you when you need to spy okay

here you go so that's a liability no

payables liability let's answer it

let's and so now let me jump cut boy

backing it e does the transaction

increase assets what transaction

I borrowed cash on a note payable for

$50,000 let's make a journal entry

borrowed cash that means I'm getting my

chippers look I'm getting money that's

going to be the debit debit cash $50,000

now I need a credit how did I get this

money I know payable that means like a

Friday that means I owe you money

I owe you is liability I liable for it

on my note payable so no payable

$50,000 is the credit of the journal

entry okay

now I have a journal entry so now we can

answer this little question here does

the transaction increase assets started

with zero assets how many assets do we

have now what is cash

we know cash whose nose is that what's

note payable

note payable payable liability because I

owe I'm liable for it I signed a note

with my CPA strength so the liability an

asset going out fifty thousand we have a

liability going on 50 thousand drive it

credit d.c aid Oh were anyways so this

transaction increase assets yes it does

by fifty thousand P

For more infomation >> Accounting For Beginners #24 / Does The Transaction Increase Assets / Accounting Basics - Duration: 10:02.

-------------------------------------------

ALL FOUND MURDERED DOCTORS WHO DISCOVERED CANCER ENZYMES IN VACCINE - health - Duration: 3:19.

ALL FOUND MURDERED!

DOCTORS WHO DISCOVERED CANCER ENZYMES IN VACCINES

A number of holistic doctors in Florida, over 60 of them within one year, who have been

found, killed or dead all have one common denominator.

They had all found out that an enzyme protein was cancer causing and the protein with the

name of Nagalese had been added to vaccines that had been given to humans and this is

something that has been happening on a global scale.

DOCTORS WERE SAID TO BE GETTING READY TO REVEAL FINDINGS

Nagalese is said to be an enzyme that stops vitamin D from being produced in the body

and so stops the natural ability of the body to kill off any cancer cells.

It is also a protein that is created by cancer cells and can be found in high concentrations

in children with autism.

It was revealed that it has been put into vaccines.

Nagalese affects the immune system as it disables it and it has also been known to be the cause

behind Type 2 diabetes.

It was said that the doctors who discovered this were not being killed because they had

found a cancer cure or were treating autism successfully, but they were killed because

they had researched and found evidence that vaccines that had been injected into children

had been causing cancer and autism crisis.

The doctors who had researched and who had been collaborating in Florida were said to

have been getting ready to reveal their findings to the public.

VIDEO CLIP EMERGED FOLLOWING SHOW BEING TAKEN DOWN A 19-minute video clip has been put online

with a lot of important information being said during the first 10 minutes of the video.

The speaker in the video is Dr Ted Broer and he breaks the information about Nagalese in

the video and he goes on to explain the findings of the doctors.

Broer had broken into The Hagmann & Hagmann Report and it took an hour to get him on air

as the show, which typically lasts three hours, had been taken down and all the lines they

had tried to use kept on being disconnected, then servers were brought down.

An hour later they connected with Dr. Broer and one of the first things he was heard saying

was that he was not suicidal.

It was said that he had been frightened that he would be taken out Hastings style before

getting the opportunity to say what he had to say publicly.

The short clip is him telling the story.

It was alleged that on three different dates in one month two doctors died on the very

same day, which means six doctors in total who died in pairs over three different days.

Many skeptics rolled their eyes at the first few deaths believing it to be no more than

coincidence that they had all been doctors.

There were many deaths that were unsolved murders, more were alleged to be suicides

and many of the deaths are under investigation.

The majority of the doctors had been holistic and all them were said to have cared very

passionately and deeply about health.

SEE SHORT VIDEO CLIP.

THE LINK IS BELOW IN OUR DESCRIPTION

For more infomation >> ALL FOUND MURDERED DOCTORS WHO DISCOVERED CANCER ENZYMES IN VACCINE - health - Duration: 3:19.

-------------------------------------------

HD Футаж С праздником Днем защиты детей - Duration: 0:31.

For more infomation >> HD Футаж С праздником Днем защиты детей - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

PPAP PARODİSİ YAPAMAYAN VELED - Duration: 0:22.

For more infomation >> PPAP PARODİSİ YAPAMAYAN VELED - Duration: 0:22.

-------------------------------------------

Learning Zoo Animals 🐅 Toy Collection 🎁 Box of Toys 🐆 Animals for Kids 🐘 Easter Eggs 🎈 Kids Fun - Duration: 6:09.

Learning Zoo Animals

For more infomation >> Learning Zoo Animals 🐅 Toy Collection 🎁 Box of Toys 🐆 Animals for Kids 🐘 Easter Eggs 🎈 Kids Fun - Duration: 6:09.

-------------------------------------------

Похудение. Мудра энергии. - Duration: 1:17.

For more infomation >> Похудение. Мудра энергии. - Duration: 1:17.

-------------------------------------------

Tin Tặc Bắc Hàn Tấn Công Trung Quốc? | Trung Quốc Không Kiểm Duyệt - Duration: 7:04.

On this episode of China Uncensored,

turns out, nuclear weapons might not be

North Korea's most dangerous weapon.

Actually, they probably are,

but this is also concerning.

Hi, welcome to China Uncensored,

I'm your host Chris Chappell.

So you know how everyone's been freaking out

that North Korea might develop

and launch a nuclear weapon?

Well, it turns out

you don't need to worry about that.

You need to worry that about North Korea launching a nuke

and

possibly launching global cyber attacks.

Since you're currently on the internet,

you've probably heard of the massive cyber attack

that began on May 11.

The magnitude of the attack here is tremendous.

We're talking 200,000 computers

across 150 different countries

so this is really the biggest cyber shakedown in history.

The attack is called WannaCry,

which is how I feel every time

I look at the news these days.

Around the world,

university, business, and local government computers

were greeted with this:

Oops!

Your files have been encrypted!

Sorry, it was an honest mistake

the hackers made.

They'll gladly fix it for you,

if you just pay them $300 in bitcoins.

However if you don't,

three days later,

the price gets doubled to $600,

and after seven days,

the files are deleted.

It's a type of attack called ransomware.

Like software, but with ransom.

I'm sure you understand.

Who's to blame for this outrage?

Well, it might be North Korea.

Cybersecurity firm Symantec and Kaspersky Lab

have identified code in a version of the WannaCry virus

that is linked to the Lazarus Group.

That's the same group that was behind the Sony Pictures hack in 2014.

They're also known for stealing 81 million dollars

from Bangladesh's central bank.

And they work for North Korea.

That isn't enough to say this attack was definitely done by North Korea.

For example,

some experts say this ransomware attack

isn't how North Korean hackers usually operate.

Or that it's possible that other hackers

just borrowed the code from Lazarus.

Which makes the dark web

sound kind of like friendly neighborhood

where your next-door hacker can ring your computer

and ask to borrow a cup of code.

The point is,

we don't know for certain that North Korea is behind WannaCry.

But one good thing that's come out of this

is now people are paying way more attention

to the danger of North Korean cyber attacks,

thanks to the sudden media focus.

Unless you're talking about the focus of Chinese state-run media.

Which are blaming another country for the cyber attacks.

Guess which one?

China Daily says,

"the US National Security Agency

must shoulder some of the blame."

Oh great,

it involves the NSA.

That's so embarrassing.

My favorite state-run media,

the Global Times, said,

"Many criticized the U.S. government,

saying that it was responsible

for this spread of ransomware.

Obviously this accusation is reasonable."

Obviously.

Just as reasonable as the People's Daily

comparing it to the hacking scene in Die Hard 4.

Yes, they did.

How, you ask,

is the NSA responsible

for this cyber attack?

Apparently, the NSA has been exploiting

a flaw in Microsoft Windows for years,

with a hacking tool known as EternalBlue,

which is also how I feel every time

I look at the news.

Apparently, a hacking group called The Shadow Brokers

got their hands on it

and made it public last month.

And that's how the alleged North Korean hackers

were able to pull this off.

Allegedly.

So, the NSA messed up.

But that's not the whole story.

Let's back up for a moment

and talk about North Korean hackers.

The reason that hackers like the Lazarus Group

are able to pull off massive cyber attacks

is thanks to decades of training,

Internet access,

and office space

that was given to North Korea by—

you guessed it—

China.

Oops.

Yes, according to North Korean defectors,

China is largely responsible

for the growth of North Korea's cyber espionage abilities.

And they learned well.

According to the Korea Institute of Liberal Democracy in Seoul,

"Today, an elite squad of 6,800 North Korean state hackers

are engaged in fraud, blackmail and online gambling

that together generate annual revenue of $860 million."

It's the only way the poor, starving leaders of North Korea

can fund themselves

with those mean old sanctions the UN put on them.

That, plus gunrunning,

jewel smuggling, illegal gambling,

counterfeiting, and drug deal out of its embassies worldwide.

And again, North Korea's hacking skills

are thanks largely to decades of support

from the Chinese Communist Party.

So it's ironic that the country

hardest hit by WannaCry—

which, even if not done by North Korea,

definitely used North Korean code—

was China!

I bet he does wanna cry.

The Global Times says

"about 40,000 [Chinese] institutions

have been affected;

of those, 4,000 were academic,

including Tsinghua University

and Peking University."

So if the Chinese regime

gave so much support and training

to North Korean hackers in the past,

why would North Korea want to cyber attack

the hand that feeds it?

Isn't that sort of evidence it might not be North Korea behind the attack?

Well, not necessarily.

Relations between China and North Korea

are increasingly bitter.

Former Chinese leader and Super Ghouls and Ghosts wannabe, Jiang Zemin

was awkwardly close

with Kim Jong-Un's daddy,

but current leaders Xi Jinping and Kim Jong-Un

are not even friends.

They haven't even had a state visit/slumber party

And now Xi Jinping is apparently working with President Trump,

so I wouldn't be too surprised if Kim is a bit jealous.

But there could be other explanations, too:

It could have been a cyber attack

that unexpectedly hit computers in China

in a way that North Korea hackers didn't intend.

Or it could possibly not have been North Korea at all.

Either way,

it probably wasn't a good long-term strategy for China

to be training North Korean hackers.

What do you think about North Korea's new weapon,

and the attack on China?

Leave your comments below.

Thanks for watching this episode of China Uncensored.

Once again I'm your host, Chris Chappell,

see you next time.

For more infomation >> Tin Tặc Bắc Hàn Tấn Công Trung Quốc? | Trung Quốc Không Kiểm Duyệt - Duration: 7:04.

-------------------------------------------

Charlartscript Calligraphy Compilation - Duration: 10:41.

Calligraphy Masters

x CHARLARTSCRIPT

Charlartscript Calligraphy Compilation

ENJOY!! :)

If you still watching, PLEASE HIT the LIKE button!! :)

Trust the process, hold the vision!!!

Thanks for watching, Follow Charllote on:

#CalligraphyMasters #KeepWriting

For more infomation >> Charlartscript Calligraphy Compilation - Duration: 10:41.

-------------------------------------------

TOP 10 Skrytých funkcí YouTube - Duration: 10:03.

For more infomation >> TOP 10 Skrytých funkcí YouTube - Duration: 10:03.

-------------------------------------------

Boss Baby Tayo the little bus Finger Family Song Nursery rhymes Playdoh - Duration: 0:51.

Daddy finger, Daddy finger, where are you?

Here I am, here I am. How do you do?

Mommy finger, Mommy finger, where are you?

Here I am, here I am. How do you do?

Brother finger, Brother finger, where are you?

Here I am, here I am. How do you do?

Sister finger, Sister finger, where are you?

Here I am, here I am. How do you do?

Baby finger, Baby finger, where are you?

Here I am, here I am. How do you do?

For more infomation >> Boss Baby Tayo the little bus Finger Family Song Nursery rhymes Playdoh - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

Eine lange Wohnungssuche geht zu Ende - Duration: 3:31.

For more infomation >> Eine lange Wohnungssuche geht zu Ende - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

What Game To Play | Peter Knetter Animation - Duration: 0:29.

Today, we're playing Sonic Flash Games On Newgrounds.com

Such Games To Be Played Will Be Ultimate Flash Sonic Maybe Final Fantasy Sonic X

Episode 5 Or Maybe Will Just Go To Episode 1 Because That Would Make A Lot More Sense

Sonic Oh, We Already Did Characters Sonic The Perv- mmM

No, Not Playing That One. Let's Try Sonic Boom Cannon And Here All This Time

I Thought Sonic Boom WASN'T Canon!

(Smack) Come On Peter Shape Up

For more infomation >> What Game To Play | Peter Knetter Animation - Duration: 0:29.

-------------------------------------------

Bernd Herkenrat, der Schuh-Retter - Duration: 4:31.

For more infomation >> Bernd Herkenrat, der Schuh-Retter - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

Liberty Chronicles, Ep. 5: Revisiting "The Conspiracy Theory of History Revisited" - Duration: 19:19.

Anthony Comegna: History is the grand catalog of human action in the past.

At its broadest, it encompasses everything that everyone everywhere has ever done.

No doubt, this makes for a large subject.

Few historians however practice the biggest history there is.

Rather, we tunnel down, often as far as we can go.

We follow the lives of individuals and groups, in usually very specific time periods.

[00:00:30] At the root of it all, whatever the subject matter, there is human action.

The constant stream of choices made by historical actors are the fundamental building blocks

of larger narratives.

This is Liberty Chronicles, a project of Libertarianism.org.

I'm Anthony Comegna.

Too often, however, historians forget that only individuals act, and they fail to assign

agency to particular people.

"France, China, or America does X, Y, or Z.

The Church launches crusades.

The Nation charges forward to war."

I'm not on some semantic crusade of my own here.

There is room for these terms, but we have to pair our use of collectives with a more

fundamental practice of methodological individualism.

Only individuals have ever acted, and for every action, [00:01:30] there was someone

or several someones responsible.

If all history is about individual actions, and all individual actions are based on some

sort of perceived self-interest on the part of the actor, one may conclude that chronicles

of an historical actor's life would reveal patterns about how they expected to fulfill

those interests.

Over days and weeks, we make perhaps millions of economizing decisions, many of which are

social in nature, and include [00:02:00] one or more other individuals.

Each person who willingly associates with the group does so because they prefer participation

to nonparticipation.

Individual interests are served by creating and supporting some sort of group interest,

through which each person involved can benefit from the coordination.

Those individuals or groups with benevolent or even neutral ends pose no threats to peaceful

libertarian folks, but almost inevitably, there seem to emerge social groupings whose

individual and by extension group motivations appear to be positively malevolent.

The classic example is Spectre, from the James Bond series, but real-world examples abound.

Social groups serving the interests of individual members take on enumerable different forms

of appearance, serving a variety of purposes, and they are by no means equal in their abilities

to unjustly wield [00:03:00] accumulated power.

Whatever the case may be, whatever the situation you're investigating though, there is a certain

important sense in which all history is conspiracy.

It is the story of individuals and groups operating solely for the advancement of individual

ends.

I first encountered this idea as a tool for historical interpretation in an article by

Murray Rothbard from Reason Magazine, April 1977.

Speaker 2:The Conspiracy Theory of History Revisited, by Murray N. Rothbard.

Anytime that a hard-nosed analysis is put forth of who our rulers are, or of how their

political and economic interests interlock, it is invariably denounced by establishment

liberals and conservatives, and even by many libertarians, as a conspiracy theory of history,

paranoid, economic-determinist, and even Marxist.

These smear labels are applied across the board, even though such realistic [00:04:00]

analysis can be and have been made from any and all parts of the economic spectrum, from

the John Birch Society to the Communist Party.

The most common label is conspiracy theorist, almost always leveled as a hostile epithet

rather than adopted by the conspiracy theorist himself.

It is no wonder that usually, these realistic analyses are spelled out by various extremists

who are outside the establishment consensus, for it is vital to the continued rule of [00:04:30]

the state apparatus that it have legitimacy and even sanctity in the eyes of the public,

and it is vital to that sanctity that our politicians and bureaucrats be deemed to be

disembodied spirits solely devoted to the public good.

Once let the cat out of the bag that these spirits are all-too-often grounded in the

solid earth of advancing a set of economic interests through use of the state and the

basic mystique of government begins to collapse.

Let us take an easy example.

Suppose [00:05:00] we find that Congress has passed a law raising the steel tariff, or

imposing import quotas on steel.

Surely, only a moron would fail to realize that the tariff or quota was passed at the

behest of lobbyists from the domestic steel industry anxious to keep out efficient foreign

competitors.

No one would level a charge of conspiracy theorist against such a conclusion, but what

the conspiracy theorist is doing is simply to extend his analysis to more complex measures

of government, [00:05:30] say, to public works projects, the establishment of the ICC, the

creation of the Federal Reserve System, or the entry of the United States into a war.

In each of these cases, the conspiracy theorist asks himself the question, "Cui bono?

Who benefits from this measure?"

If he finds that measure A benefits X and Y, his step is to investigate the hypotheses,

"Did X and Y in fact lobby or exert pressure for the passage of measure A?"

In short, [00:06:00] did X and Y realize that they would benefit and act accordingly?

Far from being a paranoid or a determinist, the conspiracy analyst is a praxeologist,

that is, he believes that people act purposively, that they make conscious choices to employ

means in order to arrive at goals.

It is the opponents of conspiracy analysis who profess to believe that all events, at

least in government, are random and unplanned, and that therefore, people do not engage in

purposive [00:06:30] choice and planning.

There are of course good conspiracy analysts and bad analysts, just as there are good and

bad historians or practitioners of any discipline.

The bad conspiracy analyst tends to make two kinds of mistakes which indeed leave him open

to the establishment charge of paranoia.

First he stops with the cui bono.

If measure A benefits X and Y, he simply concludes that, "Therefore, X and Y were responsible."

He fails to realize that this [00:07:00] is just a hypothesis, and must be verified by

finding out whether or not X and Y really did so.

Secondly, the bad conspiracy analyst seems to have a compulsion to wrap up all the conspiracies,

all the bad guy power blocks, into one giant conspiracy, instead of seeing that there are

several power blocks trying to gain control of government, sometimes in conflict and sometimes

in alliance.

He has to assume, again, without evidence, that a small group of men controls them all,

and only [00:07:30] seems to send them into conflict.

These reflections are prompted by the almost blatant fact, so blatant as to be remarked

on by the major news weekly, that virtually the entire top leadership of the new Carter

administration, from Carter and Mondale on down, are members of the small semi-secret

Trilateral Commission, founded by David Rockefeller in 1973 to propose policies for the United

States, Western Europe, and Japan, and/or members of the board of the Rockefeller Foundation.

[00:08:00] The rest are tied in with Atlanta corporate interests, and especially, the Coca

Cola Company, Georgia's major corporation.

How do we look at all this?

Do we say that David Rockefeller's prodigious efforts on behalf of a certain statists public

policies are merely a reflection of unfocused altruism, or is there pursuit of economic

interest involved?

Was Jimmy Carter named a member of the Trilateral Commission as soon as it was founded because

Rockefeller and the others wanted to hear the wisdom of an obscure Georgia governor,

or was [00:08:30] he plucked out of obscurity and made president by their support?

Was J. Paul Austin, head of Coca Cola, an early support of Jimmy Carter merely out of

concern for the common good?

Were all of the Trilateralists, and Rockefeller Foundation, and Coca Cola people chosen by

Carter simply because he felt that they were the ablest people for the job?

If so, it's a coincidence that boggles the mind, or, are there more sinister political/economic

interests involved?

I submit that the knaves [00:09:00] who stubbornly refuse to examine the interplay of political

and economic interest in government are tossing away an essential tool for analyzing the world

in which we live.

Anthony Comegna: Though it is today derided, history as conspiracy has a long and respected

pedigree.

With Rothbard, we can add most of the progressive historians, many of their New Left descendants,

and a great number even of today's historians from below.

Richard Hofstadter famously [00:09:30] wrote about the paranoid style in American politics.

From the Puritans, who saw Satan's minion behind every tree, to the revolutionaries,

who blamed the king for everything, to the Jacksonians, who elevated paranoia and conspiracy

theory to a way of life and even a national mythos, for many generations of Americans,

the Conspiracy Theory of History was part of a larger world view, according to which

some elite few have always exploited the great [00:10:00] masses.

Despite the colonists attempts to escape Old World power, the beast sprouted New World

heads to torment the people still.

The Progressive generation's interpretation of the so-called Founding Fathers is perhaps

best represented by Charles Beard's An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution, 1913.

Beard built upon Carl Becker's argument that the American Revolution was really two struggles.

It was the contest over whether [00:10:30] there would be home rule in the Americas,

and a fight over who should rule at home once the trans-Atlantic dust settled.

While the 1783 Treaty of Paris resolved the question of home rule, who shall rule at home

remained an open and explosive subject.

According to Beard, colonial elites circled their collective wagons and orchestrated the

coup we lovingly call the Constitutional Convention.

There, they constructed a document which protects a variety of interests, [00:11:00] landed,

moneyed, planter, manufacturing, and on and on, while denying the states or the people

any real ability to constrain Leviathan.

If the Constitutional Convention was a coup, its participants were all conspirators of

one stripe or another.

Beard diligently detailed the personal interests of each delegate, and either uncovered or

inferred direct causal links to the document produced.

Cold War-era historians were right to note that not all decisions are made on the basis

[00:11:30] of mere economic self-interest, but even conspiracies between ideologues are

conspiracies.

There they were, in Philadelphia, plotting to replace the government with one of their

own creation.

Once put to popular votes, the Constitution received the suffrages of only about 6% to

8% of the population.

Whose law is it then?

Should every single one of us be forced to live under this particular Constitutional

regime [00:12:00] because a small cabal of merchants, bankers, slave holders, slave traders,

speculators, and otherwise unscrupulous figures duped 6% to 8% of the people into being accomplices?

America did nothing to produce the Constitution.

It was the product of particular men and their particular interests.

I asked the Cato Institute's other resident historian, Jason Kuznicki, "Is history really

all about conspiracy?"

Jason Kuznicki: Conspiracy [00:12:30] theory, it's sort of a motte-and-bailey domain in

history.

There's a famous way to characterize arguments as having a motte-and-bailey approach.

The motte is the defended position.

It's the castle in the middle of the town, where nobody can assail it.

This is the argument at its very strongest form.

The bailey is where there are no defenders around, there are no opponents around, and

you can run around, unsecured, [00:13:00] and make wild accusations.

Conspiracy theory I think has a motte-and-bailey character to it.

In a sense, there have been very real conspiracies in history.

There have been.

Lincoln's assassination was a conspiracy.

It actually was a group of people meeting together in secret with a plan that involved

killing the president, and they did it.

That was a conspiracy.

September 11th was a conspiracy.

A group of people got together to commit [00:13:30] acts of terrorism.

They all agreed that it would happen in a certain way, and for the most part, they executed

their plan.

These are real conspiracies.

Now, there are other conspiracies that are much less real, that the CIA is using mind

control by way of cellphone towers, or fluoride in the drinking water, or whatever.

This is the bailey of conspiracy theories.

You can begin with the observation that conspiracies [00:14:00] have happened, which is true and

unassailable, and then you can progress from there to increasingly wild and unsupported

conspiracies that are less and less and less credible.

It's not necessarily clear, by the way, where the motte ends and the bailey begins, if you

will, because there are some conspiracy theories that have varying degrees of plausibility

to them.

Is Vladimir Putin assassinating his political rivals?

[00:14:30] Well, yeah.

It really, really looks that way, even if, in every single case, we don't necessarily

have all of the evidence that we might need to convict him in an American court.

It still looks like he's doing it.

That's relatively plausible, but it's not as well-evidenced as, say, the Lincoln assassination.

Anthony Comegna: Have you encountered in your personal research any conspiracy theories

that were the real, classic, smoke-filled room, or scheming court aristocrat-style conspiracy?

Jason Kuznicki: Well, [00:15:00] one of my favorites is an old classic, which is that

Thomas Jefferson and his Freemason associates planned the French Revolution and caused it

to happen.

What makes this one very interesting is that there is a kernel of truth to it no matter

how much you want to deny it.

There were, in fact, Freemasons who were very active in the French Revolution, and they

were some of the key players [00:15:30] in the revolution.

Lafayette was a Freemason.

Jefferson himself was a Freemason.

Can you say that they planned the French Revolution?

Well, Lafayette was one of the key players in the French Revolution.

In a sense, yes, but were they really pulling all the strings?

Were they the ones who made it happen in all of its particulars?

That's impossible to say.

You cannot say that.

That's completely unfounded.

If it were not for the ordinary people of Paris, if it were not [00:16:00] for the ordinary

people of the countryside, the French Revolution would not have happened.

It would have been crushed, and it would have been remembered as a momentary incident.

It would not have been remembered as this great, world-changing event, which it actually

was.

Yes, there was a Masonic element to the French Revolution.

That's well-evidenced.

That's undeniable.

Did the Freemasons get together and say, "Hey, we're going to have a revolution.

It's going to be in France.

This is what's going to happen."

No. [00:16:30] That is not supportable.

Anthony Comegna: What I hear you saying is that tens of thousands of average French men

and women were also devil-worshiping, Luciferian communists.

Is that correct?

Jason Kuznicki: No.

They were hungry.

They were scared.

They were tired of being oppressed.

They had political ideas, which historians still debate the degree to which the Enlightenment

had percolated down to the ordinary people, but they had political ideas that were in

many senses new, [00:17:00] and they wanted to act on them.

It was a big, messy, complicated thing.

As I often say about history, there are few truly world-changing events like the French

Revolution that don't arise from multiple causes.

The French Revolution certainly did.

It had lots of different causes.

Anthony Comegna: Catherine Williams was one of many women historians writing for a popular

audience in the Jacksonian era.

Among her many volumes [00:17:30] with an historical cast is the Neutral French, or,

the Exiles of Nova Scotia, 1841.

As was the style at the time, Williams blamed Great Britain and diplomatic court intrigue

for the French Revolution, and an unknowable number of other historical events.

She writes, "When the secrets of all men shall be disclosed at the Great Day, it is presumable

that the expos� of court diplomacy will reveal the greatest mystery of iniquity [00:18:00]

the whole assembled universe can produce.

If the real origin of many of the disturbances that have deluged Europe in blood, divided

the councils, and destroyed the resources of nations could be known, in 19 cases out

of 20, the intriguers of foreign courts would be found at the bottom of them, and in 9 cases

out of 10, during the last 500 years, England has been the intriguer."

Okay, maybe Catherine Williams was one of those over-eager [00:18:30] amateurish historians

Rothbard was talking about when he said, "The conspiracy theorist's big mistake is lumping

everything into the same conspiracy."

The British monster wasn't the only creature stretching its tentacles across the globe,

after all.

Nonetheless, you have to admit, she has a point.

Even the history of great national events comes down to the decisions made by particular

people.

Liberty Chronicles is a project of Libertarianism.org. [00:19:00] It is produced by Tess Terrible.

To learn more about Liberty Chronicles, visit Libertarianism.org.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét