Stackz
This is Jay P Bangz Music
trac1.net
trac1.net
trac1.net
trac1.net
trac1.net
trac1.net
trac1.net
-------------------------------------------
컴퓨터 오류의 습격 [외전1] - Duration: 1:56. For more infomation >> 컴퓨터 오류의 습격 [외전1] - Duration: 1:56.-------------------------------------------
Kawad - Travel for Belief - Duration: 2:10.please take a picture of me with lord shiva
all devotees take beautiful kawads
I also felt like taking my own to the lord someday
all kinds of devotees come
mothers, brothers, sisters all come from far distances
Elders say, "all wishes come true, if you complete the journey
And its true, If you travel with a pure heart to haridwar or neeelkanth
All problems will fade away
You wont even get hurt, they say! no sore feet
Nor any kind of problem on route
When I reached Neelkanth, It really felt nice
I saw flowers and leaves... Mountains.
I could hold the clouds in my fist
Its like heaven!
You should also go on the journey. Take and bring back a kawar once.
Today, thousands of kawariyas with a majority of youth from the country follow the yatra blindly.
Most are unaware of it's origin or significance
Yet, They Travel
Some go barefeet
Some race on bikes/cars.
Some prefer to hitchhike
Some die/kill of drug overdose
Some get wasted
TRAVEL FOR BELIEF
-------------------------------------------
【Undertale】G!sans Killer 【中英字幕】 - Duration: 3:03.Stuck in a limbo(here we go) 陷入困境(開始了)
Me and my sins go (Go-oh-oh-oh-oh) 我和我的罪過去(Go-oh-oh-oh-oh)
I played a vicious part(woah) 我發揮了惡性的作用(woah)
I broke an unfair share of hearts 我打破了不公平的心
I`m about to blow 我要打了
so if you come around then you should know 所以如果你來的話你應該知道
I`ll tear you up in two go ahead walk it off if you know whats best for you. 我會把你撕成兩半 如果你知道什麼是最適合你,請繼續走下去。
oh-oh-oh-oh oh oh oh
I`m no good for you(No.) 我對你沒有好處(不)
This heart aint built for two so 這個心臟並不是為了這兩個而建的
Runaway Runaway 逃亡,逃亡
Cuz I`m no, I`m no, I`m no good for you 因為我不,我不,我對你沒有好處
Get in love and ill get you loose so, 愛上和生病讓你鬆了一口氣,
Runaway, Runaway 逃亡,逃亡
'Cause I'm no, I'm no, 我不是,我不,我不是
I`m a I`m a I`m a love killer 我是,我是,我是愛的殺手
I`m a I`m a I`m a killer 我是,我是,我是兇手
lower than real low(here we go.) 低於實際低點(開始了。)
Take your heart like a repo (no-no-no-oh-oh) 把你的心像一個回購 (no-no-no-oh-oh)
You dug yourself into (whoa) 你挖了自己 (whoa)
A pretty mess that I made for you 我為你做的漂亮的混亂
I'm about to show 我即將展示
For the time you're gonna lose 屆時你會輸
By the time I go-oh-oh 當我去的時候 oh-oh
I'll tear you up in two 我會把你撕成兩半
Go ahead, walk it off if you know what's best for you. 如果你知道什麼是最適合你,請繼續走下去。
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh oh oh
I'm no good for you (no) 我對你沒有好處(不)
This heart ain't built for two so 這個心臟並不是為了這兩個而建的
Run away, run away 逃跑,逃跑
'Cause I'm no, I'm no, I'm no good for you 因為我不,我不,我對你沒有好處
Get in love and I'll bet you lose so 愛上,我敢打賭你輸了
Run away, run away 逃跑,逃跑
'Cause I'm no, I'm no 因為我不,我不是
I'm a, I'm a, I'm a love killer 我是一個,我是一個,我是一個愛的殺手
I'm a, I'm a, I'm a killer 我是一個,我是一個,我是一個殺手
Bootleg emotions 私藏的情感
Bottled up explosions 裝起來爆炸
Intoxicating you 讓你感到毒害
Learning of the truth 學習真相
I'm your seventh sin 我是你的第七個罪
Exiting through your skin 退出你的皮膚
Intoxicating you 讓你感到毒害
Ninety-seven proof 九十七個證據
I'm no good for you 我對你沒有好處
This heart ain't built for two so 這個心臟並不是為了這兩個而建的
Run away, run away 逃跑,逃跑
'Cause I'm no, I'm no 因為我不,我不是
I'm no good for you (no) 我對你沒有好處(不)
Get in love and I'll bet you lose so 愛上,我敢打賭你輸了
Run away, run away 逃跑,逃跑
'Cause I'm no, I'm no 因為我不,我不是
I'm a, I'm a, I'm a love killer 我是一個,我是一個,我是一個愛的殺手
I'm a, I'm a, I'm a killer 我是一個,我是一個,我是一個殺手
-------------------------------------------
How to choose the right dog breed ? - Duration: 4:15.Hi guys, my name is Anil
and welcome to Hugiene.com
-------------------------------------------
Fog: Letters to July 1 #WithCaptions - Duration: 1:15.Dear July,
(intro)
You've arrived in the middle of my fog.
I wish I could greet you warmly and welcome you into my home, but the dementors are visiting
and I'm not sure if there is room for you.
I'm afraid that all of my warm greetings have all been used up on the patronuses I've attempted
to conjure.
I am hopeful that I'll have some happy thoughts soon though.
The fact that I have hope still is largely because of you - you may just be time passing
through my life, but you are always such an intense time.
For better or worse, I know I can count on you to be exciting.
With you comes graduation parties, birthdays, shows of love and friendship.
You are an intimidating comfort, an older sibling lurking over my soulder remidning
me that everything must get done and that depression always eventually ends.
Perhaps that can be my happy though.
Love, Katrina
Hey Guys, so I'm going to try to do Letters to July. It might work.
Click over here to subscribe so you don't miss any of those videos
Click over here to watch my last video
And right here you can support me on Patreon - So I can afford to do this.
I'll see you next time. And, hey, I love you.
-------------------------------------------
English for Chinese Speakers 36 - 'to watch a movie' or 'to look at a movie'? (with subtitles) - Duration: 2:47.Hi again everybody, and welcome back to
'One English Mistake in One Minute for
speakers of Chinese (and its many language
varieties)'. Each week in these videos I
discuss, in detail, one common English
mistake made by Chinese speakers, and
this is video number 36.
I said this in video 1, and I've said
it in every video since -- and I truly mean
it - I think it's a very cool, smart and of
course it's a practical thing to do in
today's world to try to improve your
English. Good work. Hopefully these
videos are helping you in your goal to
master English. Anyways, in these videos I
show you a slide, and on the slide there
are two sentences: One is the correct way,
one is the wrong way we say it in
English. Your task is to decide which
one is correct. Do that now. Read the
sentences, listen to me read the
sentences, pause the video, think about
your answer and I will discuss the
answer in the side that follows.
Yeah, hopefully you got it. Hopefully it wasn't
much of a struggle for you, and you know
why it's correct. If not, hopefully
now you know why you got it wrong. It
also means -- if you got it wrong or if you
took a wild guess and happened to get it
right -- that you have to start studying
more this structure. To start you on
that path -- it's a very simple beginning, I
know (but you can use the many resources
outside of this video) -- I've given you
three sentences to study from. Memorize
these sentences, drill them into your
brain through repetition and put into
practice what you've learned through
speaking or writing or both. Just
keep going through that cycle and
eventually you'll get it.
-------------------------------------------
KIC 8462852 Update for 07/01/2017 - Duration: 8:38.This is an update in my continuing coverage of KIC 8462852 or Boyajian's Star for July
1st, 2017.
For the extensive backstory on this star, see my other videos on this channel, or the
dedicated KIC 8462852 playlist specifically.
The star continues to act up, and while a preliminary paper is due out any time from
Dr. Boyajian and her team, a few interesting bits and pieces have been floating around
that are worth considering.
More, Dr. Boyajian has been posting frequent flux updates for the star, including one for
last night which shows ongoing minor dimming.
The star has been intermittently active since late May.
Most prominently was the "Elsie" dip, which Boyajian and her team collected significant
data on.
The one take away from that that's out there right now is that color data was taken of
the "Elsie" dip and posted by Boyajian on the official site of the star in the blog
section, link in the description below.
That data shows that the star dipped deeper in shorter wavelengths of light than in longer
ones.
This helps narrow things down significantly as to the nature of the material causing the
star to dim in the short term.
It would be consistent with dust as an origin and would generally, but not necessarily,
put checks in the boxes for hypotheses that the phenomenon is of natural origin and involves
dust in an elliptical orbit of the star.
That elliptical orbit would help explain the general lack of infrared in past observations,
as the dust moves away from the star it cools down.
As it moves closer, it would warm up leading to varying InfraRed emissions.
The color data might also seem to push away from the already remote possibility that KIC
8462852's behavior might be due to the activities of an alien civilization, but it actually
doesn't really change that, at least yet from what is out in public.
Now, I must caveat before I speculate in that I personally think the chances of this being
due to alien activity is marginally possible, but very remote.
Ever since Schaeffer discovered the long-term dimming trend, and the subsequent determination
that the trend seems to be speeding up, the alien megastructure hypothesis has been in
a modified state from where it was originally.
Originally it was just structures blocking the light from the star.
But with the long-term trend, it became structures under active construction.
Then it became structures being constructed so rapidly, and increasingly so, that it defies
any method of construction I can imagine, even nanotechnology.
This illustrates the big problem with alien origin hypotheses for this star or any other;
they can be retroactively form fit to just about any observation so long as your end
is to prove the existence of intelligent alien life.
I know some commenters take my viewpoints as painfully cautious, and even that I don't
want to find alien life.
This is not the case, though I do admit that I don't want to find hostile aliens bent
on converting earth into the alien equivalent of cheeseburgers.
It's merely that when discussing alien detections, I want truth, unequivocally.
When, and I stress when as I think it will happen sooner rather than later, we do discover
an alien civilization it needs to be flat out unambiguous.
We need to be able to say this is it, and that's that.
KIC 8462852 on the other hand is too ambiguous for anything close to that, and honestly it
looks like a dust cloud.
But, I am open minded, who knows what's out there.
And, in hopes of not being too much of a downer, I would point the viewers of the channel to
my video on Przybylski's Star, link below.
I think that star has a significantly higher likelihood of being a detection of alien activity
than KIC 8462852 due to the apparent presence of transuranic elements in the star's upper
atmosphere.
This very thing was advanced decades ago by Sagan and Shklovski as one way you might announce
your existence to the universe, you start dumping elements that as far as we know do
not appear in nature into your star.
This star apparently has just such elements in it, such as plutonium, and if proven so
would pose some serious challenges to nuclear physics and misty concepts such as the activities
of the island of stability in nature.
Think either rethink the upper reaches of the periodic table and what heavy elements
can exist in nature, or take a serious look at possible alien activity because you've
got nothing else left if you can't figure out a natural way to generate transuranic
elements outside of a laboratory.
I would also note that sometimes we might use the word unlikely too much regarding the
detection of an alien civilization.
There will come a time when it happens, whether sooner or later, and the words that it will
probably happen within the next 20 years are often muttered by prominent scientists.
And when we talk about likelihoods there are two ways to think about it.
It's valid to say that the chances of catching the existence of a civilization being active
and building things in geologic time scales is very low.
Fair enough, but why then why do we bother with radio SETI?
What are the chances of catching the existence of an alien transmitter in geologic time?
And there is of course Enrico Fermi, whose paradox states that if alien life exists,
we should see them everywhere.
That thinking would suggest that it should not be surprising to spot the occasional alien
civilization out there.
I would simply ask do we really know what the chances of spotting one are?
I'm skeptical that we do know, or can even guess with any authority.
I simply say it because I suspect intelligent life in the universe is exceedingly rare,
and I do have a basis for that, but that also, admittedly, is a bias.
If it turns out that it's not rare, then that equation changes and I'm all wet.
But back to KIC 8462852.
Dust clouds don't suffer from the problems of scale that technology and construction
would, natural dust can be produced or accumulated on these rapid time scales, through cascading
collisions and other ways, and can block the enormous amounts of light as seen at this
star.
Mega structures have a much harder time there.
But, there is a possibility and onto the speculation we go, dust clouds do not necessarily have
to be of natural origin in a star system and if they aren't, then unnatural ones would
have certain signatures that natural ones would not.
That brings us to a 2011 paper by Duncan Forgan and Martin Elvis, link in the description
below.
This paper details what you would look for as far as dust and waste debris if a civilization
were actively mining asteroids in a star system.
The paper goes on to suggest that this might be an inexpensive form of SETI, whenever someone
happens to be studying an old star system with a debris disk, it would be prudent to
check for markers of alien activity just in case.
I'm not sure how applicable that is to KIC 8462852, I simply don't know, in fact if
anyone has any ideas drop them in the comments below.
But the paper is an interesting take on a novel form of SETI and I toss it out there
for those interested.
I would also briefly mention in passing that there are murmurs of patterns in the Kepler
and other data for KIC 8462852.
I've mentioned these in earlier updates, but would caution that patterns are not always
really there even when they seem to be.
So for that aspect of the story much more study is needed, though it's very much worth
doing.
If the existence of any kind of pattern is established, this story will heat up in a
hurry.
So there you have it.
The star continues to dip, and the story continues to evolve.
I think the next milestone, barring a massive dip, is when Dr. Boyajian and her team release
their preliminary paper, which I would imagine will be a bit since the star continues to
act up.
And, of course, I will be back with another update as soon as something happens.
I've included other relevant links in the description below for those wishing to dig
deep, including the reddit thread on the subject which is full of knowledgeable people and
perspectives on the story and always a good read and a fine way of keeping up on the day
to day events surrounding this star.
Thanks for listening!
I am futurist and science fiction author John Michael Godier and be sure to check out my
books at your favorite online book retailer and subscribe to my channel for regular, in-depth
explorations into the interesting, weird and unknown aspects of this amazing universe in
which we live.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét