Thứ Hai, 22 tháng 1, 2018

Waching daily Jan 22 2018

Atomic bombs are some of the most dangerous weapons humans have ever made.

They can destroy whole cities and kill tens of thousands of people in seconds, leaving

countless more with radiation-related illnesses for the rest of their lives.

But humanity didn't stop with atomic bombs.

After those came fusion bombs, which use the energy from a regular atom bomb to trigger

an even bigger explosion.

And those still aren't the worst types of nukes people have ever imagined.

That award might go to salted nuclear weapons, which would intentionally spray extra radiation

out into the world.

They've never been tested or built, as far as anyone knows -- or admits.

But if you want to wipe out humanity, they're probably your best shot.

Salted nukes are named that way because they're like a typical fusion bomb, except with extra

stuff added -- sort of like adding salt to a pretty weird meal.

They were first described back in 1950 by

physicist Leo Szilard, who worked on the first nukes just a few years earlier.

Szilard wanted to convince people that nukes should be destroyed instead of stockpiled,

and to drive the point home, he imagined a worst-case scenario: A nuke that could seriously

threaten all life on Earth.

They would work by utilizing the leftover neutrons from a regular fusion bomb to create

extra radiation.

See, the fusion bombs being developed at the time -- also known as hydrogen or thermonuclear

bombs -- would use the energy from an atomic bomb to fuse types of hydrogen into helium

and create huge explosions.

Those explosions also released lots of extra neutrons, which weren't used up in the reactions

that caused the explosion.

Fusion bombs were the biggest bombs ever made, but even before the first one blew up, Szilard

knew there'd be a way of making them even more dangerous.

If certain kinds of extra atoms were put into a fusion bomb, some of those unused neutrons

would crash into them during the explosion.

That would add an extra neutron to those atoms and make them radioactive.

Then, the explosion would send the radioactive atoms into the environment or up into the

atmosphere, where they'd send out radiation as they decayed.

Those extra atoms are the so-called "salt" of a salted nuke.

Most nukes release some radioactive atoms in the explosion, but they're usually necessary

byproducts of the explosion itself.

For example, a kind of cesium is released because it comes from unstable versions of

atoms like uranium, which are used to build the bomb.

The salt would be different.

It wouldn't do anything in the explosion itself.

Its whole purpose would be to spread extra radiation and make the effects of the bomb

deadlier, longer-lasting, and wider-spread.

So… not great.

Now, some radioactive atoms decay pretty quickly.

So if they were the salt, they wouldn't spread too far before just about all of them

decayed and released their radiation.

After that, they wouldn't really be dangerous anymore.

Other types of "salt" could have much wider effects.

Salted nukes are sometimes known as "cobalt bombs", because nukes salted with cobalt

were Szilard's original worst-case scenario.

The isotope cobalt-60 -- which is a version of cobalt with an extra neutron -- has a half-life

of a little more than five years.

So half a sample of cobalt-60 will decay and release its radiation every five years or so.

Enough cobalt could take so long to fully decay that the area around the explosion would

be uninhabitable for almost a century.

But, that's not the only problem.

Since it takes so long to break down, Szilard pointed out that there's plenty of time

for radioactive cobalt-60 from a salted nuke to get swept by air currents and spread around the world.

Small amounts of it would also stay in the atmosphere worldwide for decades — because

once it's out there, there's no real way of getting it back.

Szilard originally estimated that it wouldn't take many cobalt bombs for their cumulative

radiation to seriously threaten all life on Earth.

Now, today's experts think that's a little extreme.

Modern nukes are generally smaller than the ones imagined in the 50s, and it would take

a lot of cobalt to spread around the entire planet.

Plus, like, deep-sea bacteria are probably going to be just fine.

But a volley of cobalt bombs would definitely be incredibly dangerous, whether or not you're

near the explosions and whether they happened yesterday or ten years ago.

If all this sounds a little familiar, it might be because salted nukes are the doomsday device

in the 1960s movie Dr. Strangeglove.

But unlike the movie, no country on Earth has ever officially built or tested a salted

nuke -- at least, as far as anyone can tell.

And as we've seen in the last couple years, it's kinda hard to test a nuke without someone noticing.

They wouldn't be impossible for a nuclear-armed country to build, but publicly, everyone pretty

much agrees that these things are horrible.

And that there are more efficient ways of blowing stuff up.

Still, there were headlines a few years ago after what seemed like an accidental leak

of Russian plans involving one.

The plans were for a gigantic salted nuke that would release huge waves of radioactive

water toward the United States.

But experts have dismissed the leak as propaganda.

It required exploding a bomb underwater -- one twice as large as the largest bomb ever exploded

-- to create a completely uncontrollable tsunami.

Which seemed impractical.

And everyone else in the world super promises they don't have any salted nukes, either.

Which feels like a relief.

Because, let's be real: Regular ol' nukes are bad enough.

Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow!

If you'd like to learn more about nuclear weapons -- like how you'd stop one -- you

can watch one of our other episodes and keep getting smarter with us.

For more infomation >> Salted Nukes: An Even More Dangerous Bomb - Duration: 4:59.

-------------------------------------------

How To Draw And Color Fish for Kids Colors Picture Fish Coloring Page - Duration: 12:04.

How To Draw And Color Fish for Kids Colors Picture Fish Coloring Page

For more infomation >> How To Draw And Color Fish for Kids Colors Picture Fish Coloring Page - Duration: 12:04.

-------------------------------------------

the most unfair things in kpop [eng/pl] - Duration: 10:48.

Hey, you, get off my cloud

You don't know me, and you don't know my style...

I should take it off, to be cultural

Welcome to my channel. I invite you to watch the video about

the most unfair things in kpop.

Line distribution in AOA is a joke. Even it's my second ultimate band, on the one hand I'm happy that Choa left the band. Maybe now, Chanmi will have one syllable in each song.

The amount of Jin's lines in BTS songs.

Poland has more expensive tickets for kpop concerts than other countries.

Daesung and SeungRi have fewest lines to sing in BIGBANG's songs.

I'm angry about GD's lines, because Daesung doesn't get practically anything.

One of the most unfair thing is that users of Android cannot buy streaming passes on Melon.

Line distribution of Yuta and Win Win in NCT is kinda joke.

Not funnyyy~~~~

Unfair is the ignorance of music label. It is common knowledge, that fans in Korea can do everything for kpop bands.

That Seungyoon writes songs for four of them, but the half of lyric is for him and the other half is for three of members. Plus, when they performance the sons of five of them Taehyun's parts are not divide evenly for everyone. He takes a huge majority.

Jiso and her unappreciated voice. In my mind she sings better than Rose or Jennie.

The way Pledis treats their bands.

That Pentagon doesn't add English subtitles on vlive.

They doesn't!

Hyunseung is a one big injustice, that I could write a story about him, damn.

That Pledis doesn't give a shit about After School.

CUBE.

What the Nine muses, Stellar, Fiestar, Rania and other nugu bands go through even they have a longer internship than Twice, Red Velvet, BlackPink that have milion views on their yt channel.

That Starships promotes mostly (only) Monsta X. They don't give a chance for anyone and fag out Monsta X.

Suho has got fewer lines than Sehun. Maknae bumped the lider.

That idols from different bands can be friends with each other and fandoms cannot.

It depends.

Because if...

fans of different bands don't badmouth

then they can get along.

For example - VIPs think about it...

How do we see a VIP? In my option...

I'm also like this, a bit...

VIP is too lazy

Too much like...

What are they arguing about?

Ah... I'd better go to admire oppa...

VIPs are too lazy to argue, because sometimes...

fans of BTS or EXO

that bicker with each other

have got such a temperaments and tells that

their oppa is the best and that is all.

And VIPs are like...

Everyone knows that BIGBANG is the best, fight is not needed anymore.

JJCC situation is a big injustice.

Listen, I know maybe only two songs, but...

they are as long as BTS in music industry and

they deserve some attention too.

It's good band, worth of attention.

The main problem of not popular bands, that have got great songs is the way that their label promotes them.

Because if kpopers, that are not long enough in this genre

hear the name of label like.. SM,

they won't think about another bands. They will think about SHINee or EXO.

Because label promotes them a lot.

Same situation as YG.

When someone say YG then everyone thinks about BIGBANG sometimes 2NE1, BP, even Ikon!

But when someone say AKMU

It's like...

Who are you talking about? From which label are they?

AKMU is a great band too. It's a band that contain a girl and boy, what is unheard in kpop.

I want to greet SM and the "freedom" of promotion ex members in Korea.

That's what makes me angry these times.

Of course except F(x) and Irene's comfort in those "long" dresses.

That was long time go, but still it was.

When BIGBANG were trainee

(explain how to write this word in eng)

Papa YG treated them as worst as he could

They had mouses at dorm

*come on~~~

*come here, baby...

Meet Logan.

Good rat

They hadn't any food in fridge, they couldn't take a break while training. They just lived in the worst conditions.

Comparing to 2NE1

Which had an apartment building overlooking the seoul.

So there is a big difference.

And he appreciated GD after he wrote lyric to Lies even if he is writing songs from 11 y o.

Papa YG is just a bastard. Thats all.

That VIXX skips Poland

Hyuk's lines in first songs.

That people treat boysbands more indulgently than girlsbands.

If member from boysband did something wrong they are like

He could be tired.

It's not his fault.

Music label told him to do that.

It's because he is mentally ill.

But when the girls group member did the same then she is lynched and became a nolife.

Unfair was the situation when Jackson was hated because he had a dreads in Pepsi advertisement and Kai from EXO...

...

He got beaten up too.

Kfans that bust balls.

"I still can't understand why Papa YG promotes Black Pink this much and Lee Hi or AKMU (which voices are better) are left out."

Maybe not that bad, but line distribution in Sistar songs.

Only one word. Hunus.

When Oppa takes off his t shirt and rapes the floor it's ok...

But when girl has got crop top and dances by her hips then she is a slut, kick her off from the band!

Why people don't understand, I mean it's not to you actually...

but it's to those, who hates girls group

Why people can't understand that they don't do that because they want to....

They do this because they must.

And this is...

another type of promotion

that music label uses on their bands.

A sexy feminine concept is hated

SM hides people in "basement" Comeback SNSD after 2 years.

Disband 2NE1

Girls Generation and Jessica. I don't know what she did, but girls annoyed her, ignored her, didn't let her practice and performance. I don't know what it's about but I think that Jess doesn't deserve for that. No one do, everyone makes mistakes.

Promotion of Topp Dogg.

I don't know how this happened, because

When Topp Dogg debuted it was really popular band.

I saw them everywhere.

On Twitter, Facebook, Instagram. Just everywhere.

And now they disappeared, what is kinda weird because it's ass backwards.

Moreover Topp Dogg

have been known before the debut.

Because they revealed every member before.

The way of YG treats iKON.

Whole situation about 2NE1.

For me, personally, this topic is very hard, because 2NE1 is my ulti band

I have their CD

By the way i dropped this and broke.

And in my mind...

as a blackjack I can say that I'm sad too, because of disband.

And I don't know if this subject will not be taboo, and if I'll be able to talk about this.

It's same situation like...

the Jonghyun's death.

Primarily, Papa YG

I don't want to insult him, but, for God's sake, he is going over the top.

Disband 2NE1, for example.

He commend the band only once

and that was probably iKON.

Blamed Bom for 2NE1s situation.

(there was an article, that you could deduce it)

Truly, He is trying to save his own ass.

I'm angry when someone doesn't know a band that good, knows something about a label and tells shit.

There was rumor about Jisoo from Lovelyz, that she is an lesbian and she is sexually bullying her girlfriend.

She got lynched, went to the hospital and she couldn't debut with other members.

At least, it turned out that it's only rumor, that said middle aged guy.

It's still with her.

The sun comes out, so that's all for now.

There is my twitter, instagram, facebook and snapchat.

My next question is...

the most heard stereotype or stereotype that you suggest the most or any stereotype that you know about the kpop!

Thanks for watching

and... see you soon.

For more infomation >> the most unfair things in kpop [eng/pl] - Duration: 10:48.

-------------------------------------------

3 Reasons to Get Pre-Qualified - Duration: 1:44.

Hi! I'm Catrina Langley.

Welcome to Mortgage Mondays, your resource for

getting answers to commonly asked

mortgage and home buying questions.

Today, we're gonna address pre-qualifications.

What's that?

When you wanna purchase a home,

it's important to know how much you can afford for a home.

As well as ensure you're eligible for a mortgage.

To do this, you'll contact a mortgage lender

to schedule a private consultation and discuss

your housing interest and your financial situation.

This will include your debt, income, and assets.

All of this can be done over the phone or online!

After evaluating the information, the lender

can give you an idea of the size of the

mortgage you may qualify for.

But why is this important? Here are three reasons why.

One: It prepares you for out-of-pocket costs

and signals that you are a serious buyer.

You seeking out information to determine exactly what

program and mortgage is the best fit for

you puts you ahead of the rest when purchasing a home.

Two: It streamlines the loan process.

It's a free and simple, yet very important step.

If you're serious, getting pre-qualified sooner

rather than later will help you and your

mortgage lender keep the ball rolling

once it's time to move forward.

Three: It establishes eligibility and affordability.

Knowing what you can afford and what program is

best for you gives you the knowledge to

make an informed decision when planning

the next steps towards purchasing your

dream home.

Thanks for watching this episode everyone!

If you have any more mortgage

related questions or comments, feel free to put them

in the comments section below or give us a call here at

our GVC office. Also, don't forget to like

our page for more home tips and mortgage information.

I'll see you next Monday!

For more infomation >> 3 Reasons to Get Pre-Qualified - Duration: 1:44.

-------------------------------------------

BRATZ DOLL MAKEUP TUTORIAL | KOSMIC KRISTEN - Duration: 7:07.

Hey everyone! It's Kristen and today we're going to be doing this Bratz dolls

inspired makeup look and to start out we're gonna block out the eyebrows and

start using the modern renaissance Anastasia Beverly Hills palette for the

color "Love Letter" and we're going to putting this over where the eyebrows are

supposed to be and we're gonna create kind of a upper eyelid shape so we want

to be kind of round

next we're using the Bare Minerals Pro Foundation and the color cashmere 06

and I'm using this to cut the crease

and after using this we'll be using a translucent powder to set

next I'm using the Wolfe FX white face paint and I'm going to be using

this to create the large eye these dolls have very big exaggerated eyes and I'm

using a reference photo to try to match my eyes there's once you get the shape

you like you're going to fill it in with the white face paint

here I'm using a brown face paint also from Wolfe FX and I'm using this to

create a round section of my eye you're gonna kind of want to end and begin

where your eye actually ends and begins and not go out any further and you're

gonna fill this in with whatever color that you're going to using if you're

using contacts then match it with that color I'm gonna be using Brown next I

sketched out some eyebrows with a brown pencil and now I'm going to be filling

in with a black face piece I sketched it out in order to make sure that they were

at least somewhat symmetrical and now I'm just going to be filling them in

here I'm going in and sort of smoking out the pink color a little bit more to

go up towards the eyebrows and now with a black eyeliner I am underlining at

these creases and I'm going to be doing an outline around the white of my eye as

well here I made a mistake but we go and back in fix that later

and now I'm adding a little bit of black in the middle of the eye to create sort

of like a pupil with the same elf liquid liner I'm gonna be lining the top of my

lashes and I'm going to be making sort of a wing to connect with the rest of

the eye for the top of the eye I'm going to be kind of rounding out the eyeliner

on top of the eye to make it look like when my eye is closed that that actually

is my pupil it's kind of an illusion to make it look

like it is your eye here I'm adding a few lashes to the bottom and I will also

mean by adding lashes to the top as well

next for the face I'm going to be cleaning up any mistakes and then adding

a little bit of contour i'm using the Anastasia Beverly Hills palette and i'm

kind of trying to go underneath the cheeks to make them stand out more and

also be a little bit more rounded

next using the Sigma Aura blush I'm gonna be putting a lot of blush on the

apples of my cheeks and using the Naked illuminated in luminous I'm gonna be

adding a highlight on top of that Here I am dramatically over lining my lips to

make them look more like a Bratz doll and I'm using sort of a plum red color

once I have the shape I want I'm gonna be filling in the lips with the liner

and then I will top that with the NARS Scarlet Empress lipstick

and I topped it with this huge wig that I have for a cosplaying and this kind of

reminds me of gothic type bratz that they used to have and I really think it

goes well with this look and I can decide which week to use so I ended up

doing it two looks this one is with a long blonde wig I think they both look

really good with this makeup let me know which one you guys prefer I always loved

Bratz dolls growing up so it's really cool now to turn myself into one let me

know what you guys think of this look down on the comments below thank you

guys so much for watching and I hope to see you again next time

For more infomation >> BRATZ DOLL MAKEUP TUTORIAL | KOSMIC KRISTEN - Duration: 7:07.

-------------------------------------------

Dan Roam | Innovative Design Using Visual Thinking | Singularity University - Duration: 11:48.

(music)

- Dan Roam draws for a living.

He's not an artist.

He's a management consultant who uses visual thinking

to make complicated ideas simple.

And that simplicity facilitates effective communication,

problem solving and innovation.

His books such as Back of the Napkin

and Draw to Win explain how anyone can use visual thinking.

(funky music)

- When we talk about visual thinking,

I mean something very specific.

I mean intentionally taking advantage of our visual system,

so our eyes, our optic nerve,

our mind's eye, our visual neocortex.

This incredible mechanism that we have in our heads

to help us visually see the world,

intentionally taking advantage of that

in order to see things in the world

that would've been invisible if we were just talking.

And then by virtually being able to see them,

taking kind of the underlying shapes of these ideas

and just drawing out simple little pictures

that clarify what's already in our own mind.

And then the beauty of it is,

I've created this picture of my idea

and now I have a picture that I can show you,

effectively guaranteeing that you're going

to see the same thing as I am

because we're looking at the same picture.

It's powerful, it's miraculous.

It's really cool.

- So in your first book, The Back of the Napkin

you talk about how simple pictures

can help us solve complex problems.

How does visual thinking help problem solving?

- Well, Lisa, if you think about problems.

You know, life is complicated.

Especially if you're in the business world.

Every time we look at a new challenge,

it looks very, very complex.

It's like this kind of conceptual plate of spaghetti.

So what visual thinking helps us do

is break down what appears to be

an overwhelmingly complex initial situation

and then tear it down into its underlying visual elements.

What are the pieces that actually make up this problem?

And since we're using our visual mind

and we're trying to break this complexity

down into these pictures, we can actually see it.

And you know, people often talk about

the simplicity that's on the other side of complexity.

I have found no better way to get to that simplicity

than simply to draw things out.

So let's say that this circle represents

our brain, our visual engine.

And we're going to divide it up into six slices

because it turns out that the way

vision actually works is dividing the world up

into six different types of information.

And one of those is going to be, who and what.

Another one of those is going to be, how much.

Another one of those is going to be, where.

Another one is going to be, when does it happen.

Does this not sound familiar?

This is kind of the six W's all over again.

Another one is how.

And then we'll end up with why

and what our visual engine does

is it looks at something.

You know we look at it.

And then it says okay, I'm looking for

the people and the things.

And then I'm going to look for how many of them there are.

And then I'm going to look for their location

and then their sequence and then

the flow of how they work

and then I'm going to come up with a solution at the end.

So all we do to be good visual thinkers

is just to draw our pictures around this circle.

So we talk about who we're going to draw,

some little stick figures.

We talk about what we're going to draw,

like some little icons or something.

And then we go into how much, okay?

So now we're going to draw ourselves a little chart

that quantifies our numbers.

Then we're going to say okay so where are they?

And we're going to draw a little map right here

that says, well some of the characters are over here

and some are over here and there's

a great distance between them.

And that might be a problem.

And then we'll say okay, when do they work?

What's the sequence in which they're taking place?

Well, we have our first thing here

and our next thing here and our next thing over here.

And then we're going to say okay, well how

does this all work?

Well, these things interact like this

which causes this to happen.

Maybe they go over here, maybe they come back here.

And then our last picture is what's the big a-ha?

What do I now know that's going to make me really happy?

When I talk about drawing,

when I talk about visual thinking,

I'm not talking about this as an artistic process.

We're talking about this as a thinking process.

So here's what happens, often when

we're talking about a problem.

We use our words actually, unintentionally

in many cases, to actually sort of obfuscate

what the real problem is.

You can't do that with pictures anymore.

When you draw out, and it doesn't matter

how artistically beautiful they are.

In fact often, the uglier, the simpler, the goofier

your pictures are, the more power they convey

because they get to the essence of the idea.

And when you draw those things out,

everybody looks at it and says,

I'm seeing the same thing.

You can't really lie anymore,

you can't hide the truth anymore.

It comes out.

And that's what is so powerful about this.

- Can you give us an example of a particularly

complex problem that you helped clarify in pictures?

- I have a story that is just one of my favorites.

So, you will remember not so many years ago

we started to talk about healthcare reform.

We just started.

And this is a conversation that obviously

is going to go on for a long, long time.

But what I found really kind of upsetting

about the whole conversation

about healthcare reform years ago,

was depending on which news service you listened to,

some people were saying, oh this is horrible,

this is terrible.

And other people were saying,

oh healthcare reform is the greatest thing.

And I thought, well wait a minute.

If they're both reading from the same law,

how is it possible that you get such

wildly, different interpretations?

And I thought, well let's put these pictures to work.

So myself and some colleagues, who actually

do know about the healthcare system

in the United States and about the law,

we locked ourselves in a room for 3 days

and we drew a series of 46 little pictures

trying to explain the Affordable Care Act.

Its underlying idea, its genesis,

what did it actually mean,

what was the outcome etcetera.

And we were successful.

And it took us this series of pictures

which we could then look at

and say, oh now I get it.

So I took those pictures

and I put them in a PowerPoint

and I uploaded it to LinkedIn.

This is a few years ago now.

Slideshare.

And an amazing thing happened

because within a couple of weeks,

hundreds of thousands of people had downloaded this.

And then the Huffington Post picked up on it

and they said, oh look someone's trying to explain

healthcare with these drawings on the back of a napkin.

What's very funny, is that the Huffington Post

actually put it in their comedy section

which I found kind of ironic

because I actually meant it seriously.

But then it goes crazy because now we're getting

millions of views and downloads and comments.

So I'm sitting in my office in San Francisco

thinking I'm so cool, I drew pictures

that help explain healthcare and then I got

a call from a producer in Fox News in New York

who said to me, hey Dan, since you're clearly

one of America's leading thinkers on healthcare reform

would you come on air on Fox News

and explain to our viewers with your pictures

what healthcare reform is all about?

And I'm thinking, Fox News, you bet, I'm there!

Because who needs to know better

than some of your viewers.

So they put me on, they flew me out to New York

and it was incredible.

So 5:30 pm Eastern Standard time,

we got on the Fox business channel

and they gave me, it was crazy.

7 minutes of live time on television

to go through the first set of pictures.

And it was really cool.

And as I was flying home, I was thinking

look at the power of pictures.

Look at me, this is so awesome.

The guy who drew the pictures gets on television

and all of this and then I go back to my office

and the next day I get another call.

And this time the voice on the phone says,

Dan, this is the White House Office of Communications.

We would like to invite you in to show us

how did you do that?

And so I, twice had an opportunity to go to the White House

Office of Communications and give the folks there

some examples and tools that they might use

to be able to more visually explain

some complex issues around economics,

or healthcare reform etcetera.

And it was so cool.

And I think, to this day, it's really

one of my favorite stories because

to be fair, am I really one of America's

leading experts on healthcare reform?

Not so much, I mean, I've learnt a lot along the way.

But who's the guy who's being asked to go on television?

Who's the guy who's being asked to come

to the White House and explain this?

The person who drew the picture

and I think there's no better example than that.

- So if I hear you right, if you're able to draw

the picture that other people can understand,

it will allow you to have a lot more influence.

- The battle today is the battle for attention.

We're all so overwhelmed.

Whether it's online or whether we're in the meeting room,

or whether we're making a pitch.

The battle is for attention.

There are few things you can do

in a meeting room environment,

that give you more authority today

than being the person who goes up to the whiteboard

or the flip chart.

To be the person who takes the pen in hand

and says, wait a minute.

We know we've got this challenge,

let me draw out what the elements of it are.

Magic is going to happen.

You will find that the people in the room,

you've got their attention now.

And you talk about influence.

Not to overstate it, but there's actually almost this

kind of, I guess you could call it cognitive ownership.

If I am the person who has the pen in my hand

and I'm drawing, I own your attention.

Pretty much until the moment that I stop.

So if, subtext here, I've rehearsed my drawing

in anticipation of likely questions

and I can keep that drawing going for a while

and actually get to a point,

I really own the room.

Okay, so two guys are sitting at a bar in Texas

back in 1967, Herb and Rollin

and they're got this little cocktail napkin.

And the two of them are talking about

the realities of Texas.

It's a big state and they're business guys.

And you want to travel from Dallas

over here to Houston, over here to San Antonio

and they draw this triangle just connecting

those three major cities of Texas.

And guess what?

That's the original business plan

of Southwest Airlines run by Rollin King

and Herb Kelleher on the back

of the cocktail napkin, 1967.

And the worlds most successful airline is born

off of that little picture.

And I come from a consulting background,

professional services.

And we used to have this little axiom

that seemed to hold, that myself

or someone on my team would go to every

business pitch that we did and our goal

would be, at some point during the meeting

go up to the front of the room,

take the pen and say if I understand correctly

what this project is really about,

it looks something like this and we would do this.

Every time we did that, we would win the engagement.

We were captivating people's visual mind

and they would say, well if they can do that in the room,

imagine what they can do when we actually start

to solve the problem. It's cool.

- So it sounds like this is also

a really important leadership skill.

I went to business school many years ago.

I spent a lot of time studying numbers, spreadsheets.

I did not spend any time learning

how to draw out my ideas.

Why do you think this is not being taught more?

- When we were children, we drew all of the time.

We pretty much had that beaten out of us

by the time we were in second grade

because someone said, that's a terrible drawing.

Dogs don't look anything like that, I hate that.

That's ugly, you're a terrible drawer,

at which point we never drew again.

Or someone would say, you're so good at that.

You should go into art.

No one ever says you're so good at that drawing,

you should go into business.

So, we get off path.

So if you think about people like Steve Jobs,

if you think about people like Charles Schwab,

if you think about people like Mark Benioff of Salesforce.

Or Angela Ahrendts of Burberry, or

all of these people who are great business leaders.

If you just look below what they did they drew all the time.

Now that's not made public.

So, then on the other side.

If you think about authors,

the best-selling authors of all time.

J.K Rowling, drew everything but somehow

we get to this idea that the visual side

isn't serious and so we kind of purge

it out of our thinking and it's an enormous mistake.

(swoosh noise)

For more infomation >> Dan Roam | Innovative Design Using Visual Thinking | Singularity University - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

Consistent and accurate half lap joints - Duration: 7:06.

Hi there! My name is Marie and today I'm going to show you how to make the

perfect half lap joint, whether it's on an end like this or in the middle.

Until recently I've used different methods to make half lap joints.

I've tried using my table saw with my miter gauge I've used my bandsaw. I've

even used chisels and done them by hand and what I found is every single time the results

have been very inconsistent never getting that perfect accurate joint like

on these. You want to get them nice and flush nice and perfect. I'm never getting

accurate results when I use these different methods and it becomes really

frustrating when you need to make repeated half lap joints. So what I did is I

did a little research and I came up with a method that you can use to get

accurate and perfect results every single time you make a half lap joint.

Now all you'll need for this is a crosscut sled for your table saw, a

combination Square, and you'll need the secret ingredient which is this little

piece, and I'll show you how to make one. So let's get started. The key to this

method is to make a custom spacer the exact same thickness as your saw blade.

Start by squaring up your piece of wood using your crosscut sled then cut a thin

strip about an eighth of an inch thick.

remove the crosscut sled and then find two scrap pieces of plywood that you'll

sandwich the blade in. the goal is to try to fit the spacer in between the

sandwich. it likely won't fit so just use some sandpaper on a flat surface to sand

it down until it fits between the plywood. the goal is to have a

perfect fit the first step to cutting a perfect half lap joint is finding the

exact midpoint between the top and bottom of your board while you can

certainly measure the thickness and divide by half this can sometimes be

impractical and lead to slight error an easier method is using a combination

square. set it to roughly half the thickness of the board then trace a line

starting from the top of the board flip it over and do the same from the bottom

the goal is that the lines should be perfectly one on top of each other if

not adjust the combination square until they are perfectly aligned and now you

found dead center next it's time to adjust the blade

height with your crosscut sled in place slowly raise the blade until it creeps

up close to the line but is still beneath it it's better to slowly adjust

upwards than to cut too deep on the first pass using a scrap piece of wood

with the same dimensions as your workpiece shave off one end then flip

over the piece and repeat on the other side. You should be left with a thin

shaving in between the two cuts so gently raise the blade and repeat once

again notice after one pass I'm left with the thin razor thin piece here

that's exactly what you want on the second pass it completely disappears

this is the perfect height of the blade

the method is similar whether you're cutting half flaps on the end of a board

or in the middle I'll start by showing you how to cut them on the end you'll

need both work pieces start by setting your second one the one that we're not

cutting into up against the blade and then but a stop block up against it and

clamp it to your crosscut sled then you can remove that second workpiece and

place your spacer up against the stop block next but your workpiece the one

that you want to cut into up against your spacer and make the cut

then you can remove the spacer and make repeated cuts between the initial cut

that we made up until the end of the workpiece take your time with this the

goal is to make the cuts as close together as possible while watching your

fingers and it's a good idea to keep the stop lock in place because you'll likely

be able to use it in the same position for the second workpiece in theory they

should be the same dimension it's also a good idea to mark your spacer to make

sure you don't throw it out or you don't lose it because I'll want to use it

again and again after repeating the cut for the second piece you may find that

the fit isn't exactly perfect pretty close but not perfect you'll need to

smooth out the bumps left by the blade just by lightly sanding each of the work

pieces and then dry fit again and you should find the fit to be absolutely

perfect let me tell you I am so happy with this I can't tell you how many lap

joints I've made and been frustrated with the results so I am so pleased with

this method every single time you get perfect accuracy alright so that was for

making half lap joints on the end of a board now I want to show you how to make

them in the middle so essentially the steps are the same to start off you have

to find the midpoint of your board but then you want to mark where you want to

have your joint so I'm gonna have them about two inches in from each of the

board's so I made that mark and then I'm gonna use that as a reference you want

to line it up with the right side of your crosscut sled kerf then you'll

want to butt up the second workpiece perpendicular to that

and then squeeze in your stop block which you will clamp to your fence once

you're all set up and ready go ahead and make the first cut once you've made the

cut you can go ahead and take the second workpiece out of the way and replace it

with your custom spacer and then you'll want to butt the workpiece up against

the spacer and hold that down tightly and then make your second cut

you now have both outside cuts for your half lap joint all you need to do now is

remove the material that's left in between those two lines so I hope you've

enjoyed this video and you found it useful I know I sure learned a lot

making it myself and if you did like this video please hit that thumbs up

button and subscribe to my channel for more DIY videos to come just as before

when we were doing the half laps on the end of the boards you'll find out the

fit isn't exactly perfect right off the table saw this is an easy fix though

with some sandpaper you can smooth out those bumps left behind by the saw and

just lightly smooth the inside of each of the cuts and then you'll find that

the fit is absolutely perfect

For more infomation >> Consistent and accurate half lap joints - Duration: 7:06.

-------------------------------------------

Rep Adam 'Shifty' Schiff Freaks Out On Capitol Hill As Trump Says 'Time To Lock Him Up' - Duration: 29:12.

Rep. Adam 'Shifty' Schiff Freaks Out On Capitol Hill As Trump Says 'Time To Lock

Him Up'

Rep. Adam "Shifty" Schiff is under intense scrutiny after shocking revelations about

his alleged criminal activities started to surface.

As President Donald Trump gets ready to close the book on the bogus Robert Mueller investigation,

stunning new evidence has come to light, and it's not looking good for "Shifty" Schiff.

In fact, the California Congressman was spotted freaking out on Capitol Hill as Trump warns

it's time to "lock him up."

Rep. Adam Schiff (left), President Donald Trump (right) (Photo Credit: Win McNamee/Getty

Images, YouTube/Screengrab) Back in December, Mad World News reported

on Rep. Adam Schiff's leaking problem after Schiff was caught red-handed by President

Trump's sting operation, which was meant to catch elected officials who leak closed-door

testimony to the press.

It all started on December 6th, 2017.

Donald Trump Jr. was testifying behind closed doors to the House Intel Committee.

Trump Jr. and his attorneys were told to hand over their cell phones.

During the 8-10 hour hearing, people started to wonder what the heck Shifty Schiff was

doing because he kept "excusing himself," reported Fox News' Ed Henry.

Well, Schiff was talking to CNN, and he was reporting the big "smoking gun," finally

tying Trump to Russia, or so he thought.

The Daily Caller explains, "CNN misreported key details of an offer made to Donald Trump

Jr. last year of a batch of stolen WikiLeaks documents.

The story, which CNN published on Friday and covered extensively on TV, was touted as the

first evidence that the Trump campaign was given a heads-up about documents stolen from

Democrats."

However, the CNN story appears to have been riddled with errors, while also lacking key

context, and it was just given a "Fake News Award" by the president last night, appearing

as #3 on his hit list.

Perhaps the most jarring error in the CNN report is the date which members of the Trump

Organization, including Donald Trump and Trump Jr., were sent the email.

The network reported that a person named Mike Erickson sent the email on September 4, 2016,

with a link to WikiLeaks documents as well as a decryption key to access them.

Here's how Shifty Schiff was set-up: The date he saw was September 4th, but the real

date on the email sent to Don Jr. was September 14th.

This was easily done by covering up the "1" in 14, but it makes a huge difference.

On September 13th, WikiLeaks made those emails available to the public.

Thus, Trump Jr. had no "advanced" notice or collusion with anyone.

Yet, CNN reports the fake news while Don Jr. is still testifying behind closed doors.

So, the president waited.

Anyone in that closed door meeting who "leaked" that bogus date was a goner.

Later, various news outlets picked up and confirmed that Adam "Shifty" Schiff was

the leaker, and now, he is busted.

It has just been confirmed by multiple sources that the only person who had the motive, the

means, and the opportunity to commit a felony and leak classified information was none other

than Rep. Adam Schiff.

The Washington Times reports, "Donald Trump Jr.'s attorney, Alan S. Futerfas, was told

by the Intel Committee he was no longer bound by a confidentiality agreement and could defend

his client," since Schiff was highly suspected as the leaker.

How did Mr. Futerfas suggest that whoever leaked the story knew it was erroneous?

The Washington Times adds, "He did it in this sentence.

'From the moment the Erickson email story broke at 8 a.m. on Dec. 7 until the moment

[CNN] issued [its] retraction at about 4 p.m. that same day, the individuals responsible

for disseminating this inaccurate information to the press stood by and did nothing, all

the while knowing that the story they had leaked was inaccurate and that the implications

thereby suggested were grossly misleading.'"

Mr. Futerfas's implication is that the leaker (Adam Schiff) let the story catch fire on

social media and other venues before correcting it.

Now, Schiff is feeling the heat from President Donald Trump, who said, "From intelligence,

papers are being leaked, things are being leaked.

It's criminal action.

Criminal act."

Trump's made it clear to the DOJ that he expects them to do their job and prosecute

these leakers.

So, it's no surprise that Schiff was caught freaking out on Capitol Hill, trying to throw

the blame on Steve Bannon of all people.

Insiders say "Shifty" Schiff is a hot mess, knowing Trump's on his tail, with

indictments ready to be handed down.

It's prison time, and Schiff knows it.

Here's what the California Congressman is allegedly guilty of: "Under 18 U.S.C. § 1001,

it is a felony offense to 'knowingly and willfully . . . make a materially false'

statement in the course of an investigation by any branch of the federal government,"

reports Lawfare.

It comes with a sentence of 5-20 years in prison.

So, if you lie about a material fact in the course of an investigation leak, you've

committed another substantive felony, and it's one that is very frequently prosecuted,

adds Lawfare.

If that's not bad enough, then, there's Rep. Trey Gowdy, who threw "Shifty" Schiff

under the bus today, exposing him as a dirty rat politician.

"Some of my colleagues have already made up their minds, namely Adam Schiff.

He found collusion before we even started.

I'm not sure how you do that, but he did it," said Gowdy, who's chairman of the

House Oversight Committee, speaking about Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the House

Intelligence Committee.

The writing is on the wall.

Adam "Shifty" Schiff is burning up his phone, calling his attorneys as President

Donald Trump closes in on the deep state rats.

Schiff knew all along that Trump had not colluded with the Russians, but he carried on, lying

and leaking intel, hoping to get him impeached.

Now, he finds himself at Trump's mercy, and the only thing the president will give

"Shifty" Schiff is what he deserves — real American justice, where no man is above

the law.

For more infomation >> Rep Adam 'Shifty' Schiff Freaks Out On Capitol Hill As Trump Says 'Time To Lock Him Up' - Duration: 29:12.

-------------------------------------------

How to Draw Rainbow for Kids | Rainbow and more Coloring Pages for Kids | 1 Hour Compilation - Duration: 1:03:23.

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]

Magic

Coloring Pages

For more infomation >> How to Draw Rainbow for Kids | Rainbow and more Coloring Pages for Kids | 1 Hour Compilation - Duration: 1:03:23.

-------------------------------------------

TRICOT • Comment rentrer les fils (finitions) - Duration: 3:48.

For more infomation >> TRICOT • Comment rentrer les fils (finitions) - Duration: 3:48.

-------------------------------------------

Dan Roam | Drawing the Birth of an Airline | Singularity University - Duration: 1:18.

- So, we're going to talk here for a moment

about an airline.

So, two guys are sitting in a bar

in Texas back in 1967,

Herb and Rollin,

and they've got this little cocktail napkin,

and the two of them are talking about

the realities of Texas.

You know, it's a big state, and they're business guys,

and you want to travel from Dallas

over here to Houston

over here to San Antonio

and they draw this triangle just connecting

those three major cities of Texas,

and guess what?

That's the original business plan of Southwest Airlines,

drawn by Rollin King and Herb Kelleher,

on the back of the cocktail napkin, 1967,

and the world's most successful airline

is born off of that little picture.

- So, by drawing out this triangle,

of these three cities,

how did that clarify, for them,

what kind of airline they wanted to create?

- At that time,

imagine the whole United States is around here.

And at that time, airlines had these hub and spoke systems

that obligated them to make these very crazy routes

to try to get from some place to another

and so what they said is,

"These three cities are the three major parts of Texas.

"Wouldn't it be awesome if we created an airline

"that bypassed all of this chaos,

"and just connected those three cities?"

And it was the simplicity of that thinking,

that was the breakthrough,

redefining how the airline industry worked.

For more infomation >> Dan Roam | Drawing the Birth of an Airline | Singularity University - Duration: 1:18.

-------------------------------------------

MELANKOLİK BEAT I SAD RAP BEAT I Aşk Delikanlıyı Bozar - Duration: 3:13.

For more infomation >> MELANKOLİK BEAT I SAD RAP BEAT I Aşk Delikanlıyı Bozar - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

#EasyWins Episode 7: Avoid Photos - Duration: 0:34.

For more infomation >> #EasyWins Episode 7: Avoid Photos - Duration: 0:34.

-------------------------------------------

Makijaż Halloweenowy - Duration: 1:33.

I put Kryolan wax on my clear face. I'm forming the shape of scars. I apply foundation.

Anastasia Beverly Hills Modern Renaissance Warm Taupe

I apply a shadow to the entire upper and lower eyelids, blending its outer edges.

Huda Beauty Rose Gold Palette Black Truffle

I darken the eyelash line with black eyeshadow.

Anastasia Beverly Hills Modern Renaissance Vemer

I light up inner corner.

I apply false lashes.

I apply black shadow to the scars and blending them with a burgundy color.

I put F/x blood on the scars.

I apply Mac Cosmetics Self Aware lipstick and cover it with a clear lip gloss.

... more blood

For more infomation >> Makijaż Halloweenowy - Duration: 1:33.

-------------------------------------------

Schools & Social Inequality: Crash Course Sociology #41 - Duration: 11:27.

We've all complained about having to go to school at some point, right?

I mean, who decided that teenagers need to get to school at the ungodly hour of 7 am?

That right there seems like a big drawback that we didn't consider when we talked about the positive functions of schools.

Last week, we discussed all the good things about schooling –

how it helps people learn about the world, how it helps kids meet other kids their own age,

and how there are countless other ways it helps society function better.

But there are many not-so-good components of our educational system – and I'm not just talking about having to get up at dawn.

Social-conflict theory can help us understand how the US educational system can disadvantage some people,

while giving advantages to others, so that schools ultimately play a role in reinforcing inequalities.

[Theme Music]

Education is supposed to be the great equalizer, right?

We're all told that if you work hard and do well in school, you can be whatever you want to be when you grow up.

In this understanding of school, society creates a meritocracy, or a system in which hard work and talent is recognized and rewarded.

In a pure meritocracy, two kids who work equally hard and have the same raw talent should do equally well –

no matter what neighborhood they grew up in, no matter their race or gender, and no matter their class standing.

On the surface, it might seem like the US has a meritocratic school system.

But educational measures of merit, like grades or SAT scores, don't always measure everyone's talents consistently.

Grades don't just measure an individual student's effort or ability –

they're also influenced by many factors outside of the student's control, like the quality of their school or their access to resources like books or computers.

This is where social-conflict theory comes into the story.

Social-conflict theory helps explain how our educational system can both cause and perpetuate class differences.

In the United States, there are large class gaps in educational attainment.

While 83% of students from high income families enroll in college after high school, only 63% of low income students do.

So, why the disparity?

One reason is that wealthier kids tend to live in higher income neighborhoods, which in turn fund better quality schools.

This makes it easier to get into college.

In the US, school funding is determined at the local level – and when I say local, I mean very local.

The city or town that a person lives in determines the funding of their school system.

While federal and state governments provide some support to school districts, most of the money comes from local property taxes –

meaning that schools in towns with more expensive houses and higher earning residents have more resources.

For example, Fairfax County, Virginia, one of the richest counties in the US, spent $13,700 per student in 2016.

Compare that to what some of the poorest counties in the country spend –

for example, Scott County in Mississippi spends a little more than half that amount, at $7,900 per student.

Unsurprisingly, schools in more affluent communities on average provide a better education than schools in poorer communities.

Having more funding for a school allows schools to hire better teachers, buy more and better supplies, offer a wider variety of classes, and provide extracurricular activities.

And these differences in school quality translate to differences in outcomes for students.

We know this because of research like a recent study done by American economists

Kirabo Jackson, Rucker Johnson, and Claudia Persico which used a natural experiment – court mandated school finance reform – to show this.

They found that increasing school funding levels by 10% was associated with students earning 7% higher incomes as adults.

And this is only one of many studies that show that access to better quality, better funded schools makes kids more likely to go to college.

So is money the answer?

If we just give schools more money, will that be enough to fix the class differences in educational attainment?

Well, yes and no.

School funding – or the lack of it – is part of the social inequality we see in the US education system.

But there are plenty of school districts that are already spending a lot of money per student and still struggle to improve their student's outcomes.

So why is that?

You might remember French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu's work on cultural capital from our episode a few months ago on socialization.

Cultural capital is valuable cultural knowledge and experience that can be translated to forms of economic and social capital.

Even if school funding was the same everywhere, students whose parents have the time, money, and knowledge

to support education in the home will have a step up on students whose parents don't have the time or resources to pass on cultural capital.

For example, higher income parents are more likely to read to their kids and spend more time interacting with their children, even at very young ages –

which leads to kids entering school with a more robust vocabulary and better literacy skills than their less affluent peers.

By the age of three, children of professionals have vocabularies that are 50% larger than those of children from working-class families.

Children from different class backgrounds are also exposed to different expectations about the path that their lives will take.

If you grow up in an upper middle class neighborhood where your parents and all your friends' parents have college degrees,

you're much more likely to expect that you'll go to college, too – and you'll prepare accordingly.

Recall the self-fulfilling prophecy from last episode?

This is one way that works.

But for people whose parents didn't go to college, expectations for attending college may be lower.

It may also be much harder to navigate applications for college, understand how the financial aid system works,

or register for courses, all distinct barriers to attending college.

This specialized knowledge is a form of cultural capital.

So, schools and families unfortunately often work together to reproduce social inequality

– kids with parents who have more time or money to devote to education in the home are also the kids most likely to be in well funded, high quality schools.

And the US education system doesn't just contribute to class gaps in educational achievement.

We also see persistent achievement gaps by race in the US, and they're made worse by elements of our education system that advantage white students.

We've talked before about the role that historical patterns of segregation have played in shaping the neighborhoods that minority kids grow up in.

For example, Black children are more likely to be living in lower income neighborhoods,

which tend to have worse schools because of how schools are supported by local tax dollars.

That's a real structural disadvantage.

But social-conflict theorists point out other, lesser known ways that our education system privileges White students over minority students, particularly Black and Hispanic students.

First, most teachers and school administrators are white –

which has important implications both for the curriculum that students are taught in schools and how students are evaluated.

A recent study of a nationally representative sample of American students

found that black students with the same standardized test scores as their white classmates were less likely to be nominated for gifted programs if they had a non-black teacher.

But this bias didn't exist for students who had a Black teacher.

This is an example of tracking, in which schools assign students to different types of educational programs.

While tracking is supposed to help teachers meet different students' needs, it often ends up enhancing existing inequalities.

White and Asian students are more likely to chosen to be in honors or AP classes than Black and Hispanic students –

which then contributes to racial gaps in college attendance.

Who gets chosen for college prep classes and who's put in vocational classes

often has to do with not just academic ability, but teacher's perception of a student's behavior.

Let's go to the Thought Bubble to talk about how classroom discipline has especially negative implications for minority students.

In the classroom, certain behaviors are expected of students.

Sit at your desk. Raise your hand.

Finish your assignments quickly and quietly.

While these may seem simple once you're an adult, these tasks are often difficult for young kids, but breaking these rules can have huge consequences.

Minority students, particularly Black and Latino boys, are much more likely to be disciplined for minor classroom infractions like these,

often resulting in suspension of expulsion from school.

Black students are suspended at rates three times higher than their white classmates.

And if you're suspended or expelled, you're not in the classroom learning.

Higher risk of suspension and expulsion also puts minority students at a higher risk of doing poorly in school and contributes to higher dropout rates.

This ultimately affects their job prospects, and therefore their class standing.

But being in school also keeps kids off the street.

Kids who are suspended or expelled are more likely to engage in risky behaviors like drug use or other criminal behavior.

This contributes to what's known as the school to prison pipeline.

This is an informal 'tracking' for students that criminalizes deviant behavior in schools,

even minor disciplinary issues, like talking back to teachers.

For minority students, schools are more likely to escalate disciplinary issues to the juvenile justice system,

putting students in contact with the criminal justice system at an early age.

Thanks Thought Bubble.

Another way that minority students end up being sorted into lower academic tracks are through standardized test scores.

Standardized tests are a topic of great contention, due to concerns about teachers 'teaching to the test' and not teaching a full, broad curriculum.

And most standardized tests are made and tested on the dominant group in society – the white middle class.

Critics of standardized testing often cite cultural bias as part of the reason that we see gaps in test scores across race and class lines.

The federal school funding requirements put in place by the No Child Left Behind act in 2001

also can create some perverse incentives for how schools classify their students.

To keep getting federal funding, schools have to have a certain percentage of their students pass the national assessments.

But students can be made exempt from these tests if they're classified as disabled

– which can lead to schools labeling marginal students as learning disabled to maintain the pass rate that they need to get funding.

This is important, because, as we discussed last week, the labels that schools give students often turn into self-fulfilling prophecies.

A marginal student who's kept in the regular testing pool may be more likely to have teacher time and resources devoted to their improvement than one who's labelled as learning disabled.

And, this type of tracking is more common for minority students, which can contribute to racial gaps in educational achievement.

More broadly, tracking can have long term consequences for what kinds of opportunities are available to students or the choices that they make later in life.

For example, boys are more likely to be tracked in higher level math classes than girls are.

This contributes to fewer women pursuing math-heavy careers, like economics or engineering –

which happen to be some of the more highly paid careers, meaning that tracking is one contributor to the gender pay gap.

Ultimately, educational systems are grounded in the biases of the society that they're built within –

and while our schooling system does a lot of good, social conflict theorists point out that its structural features –

everything from taxes, to cultural capital, to standardized testing –

can disadvantage minorities in ways that can perpetuate patterns of social inequality.

Today, we discussed a few of those social inequalities in the US education system,

using social conflict theory to explore how our system deviates from a meritocracy.

We discussed how school funding and school quality varies by income.

Then, we looked at how cultural capital and the family you grow up in impacts your educational experiences.

Finally, we used racial conflict theory to understand how the American school system disadvantages minority students

through practices such as tracking, disciplinary biases, and standardized testing.

Crash Course Sociology is filmed in the Dr. Cheryl C. Kinney Studio in Missoula, MT, and it's made with the help of all of these nice people.

Our animation team is Thought Cafe and Crash Course is made with Adobe Creative Cloud.

If you'd like to keep Crash Course free for everyone, forever, you can support the series at Patreon, a crowdfunding platform that allows you to support the content you love.

Thank you to all of our patrons for making Crash Course possible with their continued support.

For more infomation >> Schools & Social Inequality: Crash Course Sociology #41 - Duration: 11:27.

-------------------------------------------

Is It Safe To Kiss Fish? | Bass Fishing - Duration: 2:01.

Glenn: Hey folks, Glenn May here with BassResource.com, and welcome to another addition of Hank Parker's

Fishing Tips.

Hank, this week's question, it comes from Gary Kilmartin from Illinois.

And he wants to know is it safe from a health standpoint to kiss a fish like I often see

anglers do before releasing them?

Hank: Well I'd say it's safe, but it can give you bad breath.

I don't know if you've ever been around Jimmy Houston but kisses all those fish, and

I can tell you when the bite's on for Jimmy, because he's got the worse breath.

I don't know if he French kisses those bass or not, but I've got some pretty strong

suspicions that Jimmy's a little wild kissing those fish.

But no, I think it's fine.

Most of time, if you watch me kiss them, I'm faking it anyway.

I don't really make contact.

Now Jimmy, that's a whole different story.

But I think he's alright.

He's 72 years old, but the way.

Jimmy Houston.

Still has bangs, so what can you say about that.

72 year old man with bangs.

But I will say this, Jimmy Houston is one of the coolest, neatest, friends that I have.

And that rascal's 72 years old, and he acts like he's 50 years old.

He's wide open.

So I think kissing bass may be healthy.

Glenn: It works for him, doesn't it?

Hank: It's the secret for life, I don't know.

It's working for Jimmy

Glenn: Well there you go Gary, pucker up and kiss those fish.

For more tips and tricks like this, go check out hankparker.com and all the information

that's on there.

It's loaded full of pages and pages of information and videos that you can look at to your heart's

delight.

And if you wanna be notified of more videos like this, just check out our YouTube channel,

subscribe to it.

Thanks for watching and have a great day.

For more infomation >> Is It Safe To Kiss Fish? | Bass Fishing - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

foxyLV - Louis Vuitton Speedy Golden Arrow REVIEW - Duration: 13:43.

(Shameless selfie shots)

Okay, I give up.

Hi everyone, it's Angel. So, today I got a new bag! Super excited!

It's one off of my wishlist, which is my New Year's resolution, by the way,

to start crackin' down on my wishlist 'cause I have like, four pages worth of stuff that I want to get that is all

from past collections that I missed out on.

So, this is one of the items, super super excited. Oh! The best part is I got it for a steal!

I LOVE when I get items for like, way more than half off the price of retail. Makes me so happy.

Woohoo! Here is my brand new beauty, eek!

Ugh, com'on dust bag. There we go!

It is the Louis Vuitton Speedy Golden Arrow in bordeaux!

So this bag came out in 2012 as part of the fall/winter campaign, it's one of the bags Marc Jacobs designed.

I love it. Love it to death. This bag came in three different colors: Bordeaux (this one),

it came in black, which is gorgeous, which is originally the one I wanted, but I ended up going with this color.

And then there was this beige color. Didn't like it very much. That was never going to be on my list,

to be honest. But if it's your type, then, good for you! I just can't rock beige, really, it's too neutral for me.

So I have the PERFECT description for this bag, one second!

"The Speedy Golden Arrow collection draws it's inspiration from the 1920's luxury boat/train,

reimagined for today's chic traveller."

I love that description of this bag.

So, super excited that I got this marked off of my wishlist, we are now going to go in for a close-up

and I'm going to give you a lovely review on this bag: What I think, what are the pros and cons,

oh my God I'm not a normal person and I can't speak.

Let's go into the review.

That was horrible, wasn't it? (You've done worse -JRT).

So, when you first see this bag, it's a real eye-catcher because of this big brass buckle right here,

which is the "Golden Arrow" part. It is solid brass, it's beautiful, with gold overlay.

I like it, it's really pretty. So, the bordeaux color is this like, burgundy-red.

It's actually really stunning in person, and it'll go with a lot of outfits, which is why I really like it.

Now, this is a structured speedy, so it does retrain it's shape, and it's not going to slouch on you

when you put stuff in it, like the regular mono speedy, which is really good.

Now, one of the downsides to it, is actually this big brass buckle. Every time that you wanna open it,

you have to take the buckle and flip it back, like that. And another con is the...

Okay, see there we go, that's a problem right there. The zippers! It's a very structured purse,

so the zipper's are, they get stuck right here and you really have to apply pressure to get them down,

so the one thing that I like to do when I hold the purse is I have the buckle down like that

and I just keep the zippers open so I can just sliiide my hand in here and get my phone

or whatever I'm trying to reach.

Another awesome part is this was made in 2012, so, the monogram canvas,

it's much THICKER than the canvas we have today, which is nicer. This is an all-weather speedy,

so you can take it out in the rain and you DO NOT have to worry. When I originally got it,

there was some scuffs on it. I was able to clean those bad boys off with a, uh...

What are those things called? We use 'em every day.

A BABYWIPE! Haha! And if you are going to use a babywipe to clean up your mono canvas or the leather,

ALWAYS use non-alcohol, non-scented, and it works perfectly.

So. It has brass right here, on the sides, each of these little things say "Louis Vuitton."

The leather goes on the back, no brass. On the side, it's monogram with the piping and the bordeaux.

And, of course, the zippers are brass also, but they're a little hard to open, like I said.

Ooooon the inside, you have this beautiful bordeaux-burgundy lining, I like it, it's very smooth to the touch,

it makes it easier to get access to. You have one big pocket right here, kind of a plus, kind of a not,

I mean, it's easy-access, but it kinda stays open, like... Big open,

so it can get in the way when you are trying to get things, so that kinda gets annoying.

It does say "Louis Vuitton Autumn Hiver 2012-2013, Made in Paris," or "Made in France,"

the date code on this is really-really hard to read, it's "AR3012," I believe,

and I really had to dig in there to find it.

(It's actually AR3102 -JRT)

But it does have a lot of space, it is a size 30.

It's absolutely stunning.

I really love that it's structured, 'cause I don't have a lot of my speedys, just, aren't structured,

so, it makes it really nice to hold. Another downside to this bag is it's weight.

It's heavier than a normal speedy, so please be aware of that, and the more you fill it, the more it's gonna weigh.

On the bottom, it has four feet, and that is another plus to this bag, right here.

And then there's a piece of leather, so this helps it keep it's structure, so you don't really have to worry about it.

When I'm not using it, I am going to fill it with airbags and some other stuff to help it keep it nice...

Oh, there's something that got on the bag, I'm going to have to clean it after this, okay. That's okay!

So, what I really like about this bag is it's easy to clean, all-around, it's structured,

the only problem and con about it is it weighs a lot, and it also is a little harder to access, but,

this isn't an everyday speedy, so, that's a plus.

If you are thinking about getting this as an everyday bag, I would discourage you from doing that.

I would say get this as an extra bag that you can carry around.

I mean it would be great to go into meetings and whatever else.

So.

On the plus side: it's gorgeous, it's all-weather.

I love that I can take this speedy out into the rain and not have to worry about it.

Actually, it was raining today and I was, a little bit, but I was like, "Nope!"

It's grained leather, we are ALL good.

The color, great thing, it goes with a lot of your outfits, you can mix-and-match and faaabulous.

The inside: It's great.

I think this is going to be one of my favorite speedys and you're probably gonna see this a lot on Instagram,

and I am super happy with this purchase.

ALSO, guys, so, this bag retailed originally for $3000! Woo! Oh my God, pricey!

That was the original reason why I didn't buy it,

because it was too much and I just didn't want to spend that much on a speedy, at that time.

But, I got it on Poshmark.

I wine-well, I didn't wine-and-dine, but, I negotiated, a lot, to get this bag, and I got it for $945.

Whaaat! Oh my God, a STEAL!

So, yeah.

If you're thinking about getting this bag, I say "Do."

Don't use it as an everyday bag, but it is an overall great and beauuuutiful bag to have and add to your collection.

So, up next, I'm going to show you detailed shots of the bag, and I hope you enjoy.

So I hope you guys enjoyed my review of the Speedy Golden Arrow

in bordeaux. I love this purse, it's so gorgeous.

Not an everyday purse, but, it's okay, it's one for the collection.

And I'm happy that I'm actually following through on my New Year's resolution this year, whoop-whoop!

So in upcoming videos, I want to do more reviews for you of the bags that I own.

I have close to 50 now, I think I'm on number-this is number 47 or 46?

Oh my God, I have way too many bags.

I also am going to be doing my complete luggage tag collection, showing you

all the different tags, hot stamps from around the world,

I am waiting, though, for six more tags to come in from various places and once I get those I'm going to shoot it.

AND with that video Im going to be doing a GIVEWAY!

And I really think you guys are gonna like the giveaway items.

They're super fun and different and I haven't seen anyone do this type of a giveaway yet.

I also really want to do a Q&A with my hubby and he's giving me a dirty look right now.

(NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO -JRT)

Well you're gonna do it babe, thanks.

So you guys can ask me questions and him questions, you can get his perspective

on what he thinks of my mental disorder on collecting Louis Vuitton.

I really do have problem. I know that. (So do I -JRT).

Yeah, so, really hope you liked this review.

If there's something different or something you wanna change let me know.

If there's any certain bags you guys want me to do a review on IMMEDIATELY,

comment or message me or comment on Instagram and lemme know. I will be happy to.

So, make sure to like this video, subscribe to my channel.

You can also check me out at FoxyLV on Instagram, and I really hope you enjoyed this review.

Bye everyone.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét