Thứ Ba, 1 tháng 5, 2018

Waching daily May 1 2018

Sunny Lenarduzzi: You want to get 39,000 comments on your next YouTube video?

Keep watching.

Welcome to the Sunny Show.

Did I hook you?

Hey, boss.

It's Sunny Lenarduzzi, and now, this is step one to writing a script that gets high engagement.

When you get high engagement on YouTube, you get more retention, which means you're going

to get higher rankings and more views to suggested and through search.

How do you write a whole script that's going to give you massive amounts of engagement?

We're going to talk about that today.

I'm going to take you step-by-step through it.

Step number one is the hot intro, so hook, outcome, testimonial.

That's what the hot intro stands for.

Hook is obviously getting the viewers' attention right off the bat to make them want to stay

tuned in.

Outcome is telling them exactly what they're going to get out of your video by the end

of watching it, again, making them want to stay tuned in to the whole thing, and testimonial

is if you are an entrepreneur or you are some sort of expert of any kind, giving people

a reason to believe you and trust you, i.e., I've worked with thousands of people in the

fitness space or in the YouTube space, something like that, some sort of testimonial.

That's hook, outcome, testimonial, the whole hot intro, but if you were just starting,

and you don't want to deal with the outcome and testimonial pieces, just make sure you

don't miss the hook because the hook is what's going to get your viewers' attention immediately

and make them want to watch your entire video.

The hook is vital.

Let's say I'm doing a vlog on traveling around Canada.

I'm going to hook my viewers by doing something like this.

Video: Oh, my God.

Did you just see that whale?

SunnyLenarduzzi: Really, the easiest way to do this is either by starting off with something

that's going to make them go, "Oh, my gosh, I have to watch this," kind of what I did

at the beginning of this video or starting with the most exciting piece of footage and

working backwards to tell the story of how you got to that moment because then, people

know something really exciting is coming and you're going to lead them all the way back

there by the end of the video.

Makes sense?

Cool.

Step number two of writing a high engagement script for YouTube is asking for what you

want.

You want people to subscribe, and you also want people to hit the little bell to be notified

when you go live when you post new videos, whatever else it might be.

You want to build your tribe.

The only way to do that is to remember that not everybody uses YouTube on a daily basis

so you got to tell them what to do, so at the beginning of your video after you've hooked

people, ask them to subscribe to your channel.

Step number three is the meat.

Think of it as a sandwich.

If a sandwich was just two pieces of bread, it's pretty boring, so the meat is really

important, and you want to get into it as quickly as possible.

Whether it's a blog and you get into the storytelling piece of it or it's a tutorial and you get

into the sequential steps, the meat matters, and the sooner that you can get into the meat

of your video, the more people are going to be engaged in your content and wanting to

watch all the way through.

Step number four is middle engagement, so keep your questions simple because again,

not everybody uses YouTube every single day.

You need to warm people up.

You get them over that hump of actually leaving a comment on YouTube.

What I like to do and how I rack up thousands of comments on my videos, I ask something

really simple.

For example, in this video I'm going to ask you right now, is the scripting process making

sense?

If it is, write boss in the comments below.

I know a few of you are going to go do that, which thank you for doing it, and if you've

written boss, then it makes me more comfortable to write more comments throughout the entire

video.

You've asked them to subscribe at the beginning, that's one piece of engagement.

Then, you're asking them a question in the middle to keep them drawn into you and keep

them engaged in your content.

Plus, up your engagement by getting more comments on your videos, so if you're craving comments,

this is a simple thing to do in your scripts to make sure that people are actually going

to comment on your content.

Step five is your outro engagement.

You want to make sure that before people leave their video, they are engaging with you.

There's a couple of things that you can do.

One, you want to ask them to like it if they liked it, dislike it if they didn't because

a dislike is still a piece of engagement, and it gets people interacting with your content

and probably coming back for more.

Ask them to subscribe once more if they enjoyed the content, and tell them there's a new content

coming up so they have something to look forward to.

Ask them to share it with someone that you know it would be beneficial to.

Another way to increase your engagement through your script is to ask a question, and then

include that question in the cards in your video.

Right now, we're going to add a card that says, "Are you going to use the scripting

formula?

Yes or no?"

Again, this isn't a monologue.

Boring YouTube videos are people talking at you.

Great YouTube videos with super high engagement have scripts that engage you and make you

feel like you're having a conversation and a dialogue.

Step number six, ask your viewers out.

Might sound a little forward, but it works.

You want to ask your viewers to join you somewhere else because what happens is someone finds

your video on YouTube, they think it's really entertaining, they think it's really great

obviously because you're great, but then, they forget about you.

There's too much content online, so what you need to do is make sure that you're sending

them somewhere where you can further build a relationship.

Of course, you're going to chat back with them in the comments, but also send them to

a Facebook group, to your email list, to your website, to your other social platforms, and

build those using YouTube.

Please just don't forget to send them somewhere because your viewers want to follow you and

build a relationship with you.

Step one is you need to take the first step, and ask them out.

If you're serious about killing it on YouTube, don't forget to grab my zero to a hundred

thousand subscribers guide.

I walk you through and reverse-engineer how one of my clients went from zero to … She's

actually now at 200,000 subscribers in less than 10 months.

Everything you need to know is in there.

You can grab it at the link below this video, and I know it's going to help you so much.

Did this video help you?

Are you going to use the scripting process?

Let me know in the comments below.

I can't wait to chat with you there after the video, and I will see you in the next

one.

If you liked this video, hit the like button below.

Share it with your fellow bosses, and be sure to subscribe.

Bye, boss.

For more infomation >> How to Script YouTube Videos (for HIGH ENGAGEMENT) - Duration: 6:25.

-------------------------------------------

「Nightcore」→ Havana ✗ New Rules ✗ Wolves ✗ How Long (Switching Vocals / 1 Hour) - Duration: 1:00:08.

Nightcore - Havana X New Rules X Wolves X How Long (subtitles in video)

For more infomation >> 「Nightcore」→ Havana ✗ New Rules ✗ Wolves ✗ How Long (Switching Vocals / 1 Hour) - Duration: 1:00:08.

-------------------------------------------

Hydroponic Ficus Bonsai Collection - Subtitles Available - Duration: 7:29.

Let me show you my kitchen balcony.

That is the washing machine & these are the plants kept here.

So this looks like a miniature glasshouse.

I have covered the grills with plastic sheet.

So, very little wind circulation happens.

There is some gap over there & over there.

So, it is kind of protected from the hot winds of the summer and when I spray water also,

it stays humid, compared to the main balcony which is exposed to the sun.

So here, by afternoon the sunlight is over and you have indirect lighting only.

All my cuttings and repotted plants come here, they recover here and most of these are growing

in water.

So you can call it a hydroponic garden.

Almost all of them are in water, except for this but he is again sitting in a pool of water.

I will now show you a very unique specimen in my collection.

This is Ficus Religiosa.

It is quite big, the trunk is quite thick and this is the pot.

Let me reveal to you what is the condition of the pot.

So there is no soil, it is growing purely in water and this was a tiny cutting.

I will tell you the story of this in a separate video.

This is just a general update video.

So I'll show you how I clean this and I will replace the water.

This paper is for covering the top.

I don't want light to go inside the water tank and this is just a plastic lid, with

a cut here so it accommodates the trunk.

And this is not very strong on its own because this keeps swaying in the wind.

So I usually rest the trunk against the wall or something else.

And this is how it looks - this is just a plastic tray where i think I got cookies in

this, biscuits.

The newspaper protects light from entering the sides.

So this way I am able to keep the water inside clean, there is no algae growth at all.

So the light is blocked from top as well as the sides.

Now I will show you the weekly cleaning of this.

I have kept a flat stone and another piece of a tile so that when this is kept, the main

trunk area is above the water line.

So this is not submerged, else the wood starts getting a decaying smell, and all kinds of

problems start.

So I always make sure that this was above water with the rocks and this is how the roots

are looking now.

Before moving into this, it was in a smaller container but filled with water

and now the main trunk is quite thick, it was probably as thin as this when I started.

This is liquid NPK, which I made from powder, by dissolving powder in water.

I have a separate video where I show how it is made.

You can find the link in the description below and this here is half litre of plain tap water.

I have taken one cap full of this liquid.

Then I mix into this and this will serve as my water reservoir.

I don't fill up the tank completely, I just fill it to the half level.

I want some roots to stick out of the water.

So here goes my plant back into the tank.

I am just making sure that any stray roots are completely submerged in water.

Now, just put the lid back.

It is not an airtight setup, just a lose thing.

So there is air circulation happening and notice that the roots are not fully submerged.

This much water in this glasshouse setup is enough for the whole day.

By tomorrow morning I will have to refill this again and this also happening because

of so many large leaves.

So if the water consumption is high, I sometimes prune this, reduce the leaves from the bottom

side and keep only few at the top, so that way I can control how much water is consumed.

And now for the lid.

This is covered from top and the sides.

There is no algae formation in the water and the trunk is resting against this.

And this area is kind of protected.

so there's not much wind, just a gentle breeze which leaks through.

That is good enough for what we are doing here.

For more infomation >> Hydroponic Ficus Bonsai Collection - Subtitles Available - Duration: 7:29.

-------------------------------------------

The Truth of Who You Really Are - Duration: 10:49.

The Truth of Who You Really Are

by Cristina Valenzuela

I Am, Therefore I Think: The Truth of Who You Really Are

I think, therefore I am. ~ Ren� Descartes

What goes through your mind when you read the famous statement above written by the

great philosopher Descartes? You might feel curious, thoughtful, reverent. You might be

in absolute agreement, or you might be completely confused!

If you�re like me, you might somehow feel that there is much more to this statement

than reducing all human existence and our individual sense of �self� to our ability

of forming thoughts. In my understanding, this declaration by Descartes is only one

half of the equation, for the next logical step would be to inquire: Who is using the

mind to create these thoughts and then shape them into ideas and judgments? Who is the

�self� experiencing these thoughts? And if thoughts were to cease momentarily, would

�I� stop existing?

In our journey of Self-Exploration the very first step in the understanding of our �selves�

is the process of self-inquiry. To be authentic and to be true to ourselves, first we must

find out which �self� we are referring to. For example, is your true self the one

that gets angry at your boss? Is it the impatient one in the traffic? Perhaps your true self

is the one that is loving and kind with your family? Or the one that gets depressed at

the state of the world?

Are you all of these parts of your �self� combined? Are you none of them? Who are �you�?

The concept of the �self� might turn out to be a bit more elusive than we initially

presumed. In this article, we will attempt to explore a variety of different angles that

reveal who we believe our �selves� to be, and reflect back only that which remains.

WHO ARE YOU?

This is a simple question, and yet it is at the very core of all self-understanding. This

question turns your attention from the external world to the internal world. For example:

Who is the one who hears what you hear? Who is the one who experiences your thoughts?

Your emotions? Your senses?

If I were to ask you �Who are you?�, you might reply: �I am Mary Jones.� However,

if I was to write down the words �Mary Jones� on a piece of paper and present them to you,

would you agree with me that you are those words? Of course not! Why? Because you use

those words to represent your collection of life experiences. You might say instead: �I�m

the daughter of Frederic Jones�. However, now you�re representing yourself in relation

to another person, but if that person were to die, would you vanish from existence also?

You might then proceed to tell me you were born in 1988 in England, your parent�s names,

your religious beliefs, the names of your childhood friends, first boyfriend, and so

forth. And yet these are only a series of facts � a story if you will � but they

don�t really tell me who you are, only how you came to be here and all of your past experiences.

Eventually, it becomes very clear that we have all grown up believing that we are the

objective manifestations of our true selves, rather than being the subjective manifestations

of them. This might sound confusing, so let me better illustrate it:

Imagine that I was to put you into a completely empty cinema the moment you were born and

constantly projected a film onto the movie screen. In the cinema it�s completely dark

and you can�t see your body at all. There is no one else in the cinema to acknowledges

your existence. However in the movie, the characters begin talking to the camera, so

it appears they are talking to you. Not only that, but in this cinema you can also experience

the senses of �sight�, �touch�, �smell� and �sound� so that you are completely

absorbed inside the movie.

There�s also a voice in the background that is narrating what is occurring in the film

and you have complete control over that voice.

For us in our own lives it is so easy for us to momentarily forget who we are when we

watch movies � imagine the above example! It�s very easy to see how we can absorb

ourselves so much into the movie of our lives using all of our five senses, and an inner

narrator that we can control. This forces us to believe that we are the movie being

projected onto the screen of the world, rather than being the person sitting in the chair

watching it.

It is this narrator who is responsible for so much of our loss of self.

THE ETERNAL ECHO WITHIN There�s a simple experiment I like to try

with people. Look at a clock for a whole minute and try not think at all.

Mostly likely you�ll find this extremely difficult. At some point during this brief

experiment, a thought in the form of a voice will pop into your head � this is your narrator

who will most likely say something along the lines of: �This is stupid. Has a minute

passed yet?� �Oh no, stop thinking! Ahh!� The narrator in your head might even think:

�You�re wrong, I have no voice in my head�.

The daily reality of our lives is that this voice � our narrator � never seems to

shut up. It even answers itself: �Should I check my email now? No, it�s only been

half an hour since the last time I checked�. But have you ever questioned why this narrator

is constantly present in your life? Who decides what it is going to say? And how truthful

is it in its judgments of the external world?

It is quite a startling realization for many of us to become aware of this voice. It�s

almost like encountering a mentally ill person who asks a question out loud and then answers

it by himself.

Of course, we do have conscious control over what this voice is saying when we choose to

be aware of it for practical reasons like recalling information, for example: �What

time did I have the doctor appointment? Oh that�s right, at 3pm�. However most of

the time, this voice, this narrator, is a nagging echo in the back of our minds. Most

of the time we aren�t aware that it is filling our life experiences with useless judgments,

for instance: �Look at the flower in that garden, it�s so beautiful.� But who made

that assessment? You. And who is listening to that assessment? You as well. You already

know that the flower is beautiful, but by verbalizing your judgement of it in your mind,

you remove your attention from the real flower and on to the thoughts you create about that

flower.

We waste very large parts of our existences experiencing life through our thoughts, instead

of directly experiencing life. This is important to remember, as an essential part of our journey

of self-growth is to realize we aren�t the voice that we identify with, but the experiencer

of that voice. And while this inner voice, or narrator, does have a survival purpose

in that it provides us with a sense of control and comfort, in doing so, it also creates

many of our problems.

The truth is that what we perceive as problematic in life has nothing to do with life, and everything

to do with our minds. Our minds, in order to feel safe in this world, use the voice

in our heads, our narrators, as a way to feel in control. We walk down the street, and our

voices continue to narrate the world around us: �Look at that black kitten, it�s so

cute. There�s a sketchy looking guy coming towards me, I better cross the street. I wonder

how old that house is?� Everything around us is now known and safe.

In this very way of trying to control the reality around us, our inner voices go on

creating future expectations and desires from the world that are not always met, as well

as fears and worries about the present moment that are entirely based on assumptions, and

attachments to past traumas that don�t exist anymore.

Soon we don�t live and flow with present moment existence anymore, but instead live

in an internal world re-created by the mind. Eventually we discover that reality doesn�t

abide by the laws of our perception, and the moment our perceptions from our �dream worlds�

and reality overlap, we begin to suffer.

GROWING BEYOND THE ECHO

To truly grow out of our need to control and resist the world depends on the strength of

that voice within us. The more aware we are of this voice � this inner narrator and

its affect on life � the more we progress in soulful maturity, experiencing true self-growth.

I want you to stop and ask yourself a question for a few moments: When was the last time

you were entirely happy with your life, and how long did it last? Often we find that once

a problem in our lives is solved, another one lies just over the horizon, so we never

truly feel as though we�ve arrived at our final destination of happiness, and therefore

we never really feel at home or feel whole.

So how can you practically apply what you have read in this article? Well, the moment

you experience what you perceive as a problem don�t immediately try to find a way to fix

it. Instead, use the problem as an opportunity for self-exploration and inquire: �What

aspect within me is disturbed and resisting this, and why?� You could also ask: �What

part of me is angry about this? Why am I jealous and insecure? Why do I dislike this person

so much?� Once you�ve identified the part within you that is resisting the situation,

inquire further:

�Who is the one that is angry/jealous/disdainful?� Obviously if you are experiencing the feeling,

then you must be separate from that feeling and it cannot be �you�.

Creating this distancing between who you think you are and who you really are is essential

in order to experience true freedom.

The truth is that you have no control over the external world but you do have control

over your internal world that perceives the external world. Remember that �you� are

not your thoughts, judgements or feelings. What �you� are is limitless. �You�

are the experiencer experiencing.

Victory of the Light!

For more infomation >> The Truth of Who You Really Are - Duration: 10:49.

-------------------------------------------

5 Bad Habits That Make Your Hair Thinner - Duration: 3:00.

For more infomation >> 5 Bad Habits That Make Your Hair Thinner - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

No Sleep | Gansta Rap Instrumental | Hard Hip-Hop Beat - Duration: 3:41.

aggressive beats, aggressive beat drop, aggressive beat 2018, aggressive beats to rap to, aggressive beats free, aggressive beat music, aggressive beat mix, aggressive beat trap,

aggressive beat instrumental, aggressive beat hip hop, aggressive beat with hook, aggressive beat tutorial, aggressive beat free, aggressive rap beat arabic, agressive bell beat, aggressive boom bap beat, aggressive battle rap beat,

agressive bell beat banger, best aggressive beat, aggressive bass beat, aggressive rap beat bass, aggressive rap beat trap beat instrumental, beat brothers hard aggressive, aggressive battle beat, aggressive beat choir,

chuki aggressive beat, crazy aggressive beat, aggressive west coast beat, aggressive cypher beat, aggressive rap beat no copyright, aggressive club beat, aggressive choir type beat, aggressive chill rap beat, aggressive beat circle, aggressive dirty south beat, aggressive diss beat, how to beat aggressive defenders, aggressive drum beat, aggressive drill beat, aggressive drake type beat, aggressive diss rap beat,

dark aggressive beat, aggressive dark rap beat, aggressive emotional rap beat, aggressive eminem type beat, aggressive epic rap beat, epic aggressive beat, aggressive emotional beat, aggressive freestyle beat, aggressive rap beat free, aggressive freestyle rap beat, aggressive fast rap beat, aggressive trap beat free, fl studio aggressive beat, aggressive rap beat fl studio, aggressive type beat free, aggressive future type beat, aggressive gangsta rap beat, aggressive grime beat, aggressive guitar rap beat, gucci mane aggressive beat, aggressive gangster beat, aggressive guitar beat, hard aggressive beat, aggressive rap beat with hook, aggressive hip hop beat rap instrumental, hard aggressive beat instrumental, how to beat aggressive nightmare mode, hip hop beat aggressive instrumental, aggressive hard trap beat, aggressive beat inazuma,

aggressive rap beat instrumental, aggressive trap beat instrumental, aggressive rap beat instrumental 2016, aggressive rap beat instrumental 2014, aggressive type beat instrumental, aggressive jazz beat, j cole type beat aggressive, j cole aggressive type beat, aggressive kendrick type beat, killer aggressive beat, aggressive kurdish rap beat, aggressive love rap beat, aggressive love beat, aggressive rap beat mix, aggressive motivational rap beat,

aggressive motivational beat, aggressive super mario beat, aggressive dirty south beat whatarwoll music, aggressive mario beat, aggressive rap beat old school, old school aggressive beat, aggressive oriental beat, aggressive piano rap beat, aggressive piano beat,

aggressive rap beat playlist, aggressive piano type beat, aggressive motivational rap beat power, aggressive pop beat, aggressive psycho rap beat, aggressive beat rap, aggressive rap beat 2016, aggressive underground rap beat, aggressive beats 2018, aggressive beats instrumental, aggressive beats instrumental rap,

aggressive beats with hooks, aggressive beats 2017, aggressive beats download, aggressive beats instrumental mp3, aggressive type beat, aggressive trap beat 2016, aggressive turkish rap beat, beat underground aggressive, beat aggressive free use, aggressive violin rap beat, aggressive violin beat, aggressive hip hop beat with hook, aggressive rap beat workout, aggressive rap beat 1 hour, aggressive beat 2016, hard aggressive beat 2016, aggressive type beat 2016, aggressive rap beat 2015, aggressive rap beat 2012, aggressive hip hop beat 2016, aggressive 808 beat

For more infomation >> No Sleep | Gansta Rap Instrumental | Hard Hip-Hop Beat - Duration: 3:41.

-------------------------------------------

Если нужно порвать всех в клочья и победить вопреки всему – Как быстро настроить себя на победу - Duration: 3:57.

For more infomation >> Если нужно порвать всех в клочья и победить вопреки всему – Как быстро настроить себя на победу - Duration: 3:57.

-------------------------------------------

NAVI vs VP. Group battles for top CIS - Duration: 10:58.

I'm ready.

I am ready.

It's vibrating.

Hello, guys.

You might ask why am I doing on NAVI channel?

Because today we have the most important game, NAVI vs Virtus.Pro,

and Yana and I are going to find out who can support their team tag better.

We're gonna do it in an unusual way for girls.

It's not gonna be a mud wrestle.

Why? I thought we would fight in the mud...

We'll just fight, let's go.

What's going on? What the f***?

Oh god.

What an intense battle.

It's the deciding game, the final.

Masha, I don't know any combos.

Me neither!

At least you performed something.

Okay, guys, my teammates are too bad, you know?

Yeah, I can relate.

Why do you have ultimate in this game and I don't?

Because it probably refills easier for me.

I see, I probably waste charges.

No, no, no!

So we played two bo3 series, I won as Triborg, Yana won as Tremor, now we'll have the decider with other heroes.

Maybe we shouldn't? Let's call it a tie and let the guys decide the winner, and we, the girls, will be equal?

Yes, we are equal, we understand that.

Masha is a great host, by the way.

Yana is also doing great, we're both awesome.

The most important game of the group for us is starting right now - NAVI vs Virtus.Pro, we'll do our best.

Ilya...

Content?

Content. The most important game is going to start, everyone was waiting for it.

Really? Is it going to happen now?

Yes, it is.

Jokes aside, are you preparing yourself and the team somehow for the game against VP? Maybe some insides...

There is nothing special, just like a game against any other team.

Probably we have an advantage, because I'd seen all of VP's games over the last three years,

because I happened to have played for that team for three years.

So I do know some stuff, I can suggest something in the game,

but the main idea is we shouldn't be afraid, like against any other tier 1 team.

When you're playing against Secret, VP or Liquid, you start doing less actions unconsciously,

because you are afraid, you expect them to be better and have the upper hand, but it is far from being always the case.

The game is starting, we're heading into the Twitch lounge to cheer for the guys.

We need to win, we need it.

Right, Igor?

Yay, it's 1:1 in the series!

The third deciding games starts very soon.

Let's go to the players.

Guys, we're taking the series 2:1!

It's a group stage, but still awesome!

Winning Virtus.pro...

NAVI have won!

It's great.

LeBron's carrying.

Didn't show Slark.

Secret strategies.

We thought we'd keep it for TI.

But we had to reveal it.

Ilya, just like you've said.

What?

A regular team.

You didn't overemphasize things.

Sure we didn't.

We didn't get excited,

we had no emotions after the victory.

Really?

Of course not.

What were you screaming?

We were screaming like crazy.

Some signatures ones, like "S**c it!"

Was there something like, "Choke 'em down?"

No, that's just some Twitter banter for fans.

We picked Axe and Jakiro for the very first time.

And Slark, too.

Why did you suddenly change everything?

We decided to fool around.

We grabbed Slark as the 4th pick not knowing two of their remaining picks.

Then we picked Zeus to cast some Lightning Bolts.

I played Zeus in pubs yesterday, and today I played WR.

Jakiro was a surprising pick.

So were Slark and Zeus.

Zeus was picked a while ago.

We expected the win, but the draft was really surprising.

It's already close to midnight, time to go to sleep.

Tomorrow we're playing against NewBee.

Here's your MVP of the evening.

That's a wrap for today, see you.

Thanks for watching and supporting us.

Thank you to everyone.

For more infomation >> NAVI vs VP. Group battles for top CIS - Duration: 10:58.

-------------------------------------------

CZUUX ft. SKINNY - Prawda (Official Video) - Duration: 2:36.

For more infomation >> CZUUX ft. SKINNY - Prawda (Official Video) - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

不爭,才是人生至境(說的真好) - Duration: 3:05.

For more infomation >> 不爭,才是人生至境(說的真好) - Duration: 3:05.

-------------------------------------------

SÙI MÀO GÀ LÀ GÌ? Nguyên Nhân chủ yếu Gây bệnh Sùi Mào Gà - Duration: 6:51.

For more infomation >> SÙI MÀO GÀ LÀ GÌ? Nguyên Nhân chủ yếu Gây bệnh Sùi Mào Gà - Duration: 6:51.

-------------------------------------------

NOW CHANGE YOUR MINDSET to Fulfilling Expectations - Sadhguru Meditation - Duration: 1:04:41.

good evening everyone any kind of ISM consumerism or whatever kind any kind of

isn't will lead to a certain mindlessness so mindless consumerism is

definitely not towards human wellbeing there 2000 industry focus on creating

conscious consumer rather than mindless consumerism because consumption used to

be a disease you know it's taxable so even now it's a kind of an ailment that

is we will not do in our lives we will not do what's needed we will do what is

expected from somebody this means your life completely derails

people who expect whatever they expect out of you they themselves do not know a

damn thing about their lives to fulfill their expectations if you live obviously

you will completely go off the track so I feel the industry should focus on

creating a more conscious consumer and a more conscious every kind ISM means a

certain mindlessness simply doing something once this sets in to a society

a mindless society will go in cycles not really getting anywhere nothing profound

will live in that society everything becomes profane right now we are rapidly

trying to go there this is a nation this is a culture where every aspect of life

simple or otherwise everything had a deeper rooting everything had always a

deeper meaning simple things how to sit how to stand how to eat everything

always had a deeper connotation because of this

no matter what kind of Riker's outside situation offered us in in the form of

innovations in the form of exterminations of certain kind famines

whatever king the spirit of India lived on undisturbed because of a very deep

rooting if you take away this deeper rooting in a human being and make him

very you know somebody who who lives out of a mall these people will get

shattered very easily you must understand this till recently till last

2025 years 20 years I would say the number of people who are psychologically

deranged in this country is extremely low I know there are a whole lot of

argument and debates or that is because it's not recorded that is because it is

not documented that is also a fact undeniable it is there but still for 1

billion people how many people are psychologically deranged is extremely

small simply because of this deeper rooting into every simple thing has a

deeper meaning and the deeper possibility today because he brought up

the issue of women and children and whatever the statistics say that 42

percent of women in United States of America or 45 years of age are all on

antidepressants if you take away a few medical formulations from the market

half the population will go crazy that's what it means that's not a healthy

society in many ways that is a product of mindless consumerism that is after

having seen that happening to one society if we do not learn from that we

for sure mindless whatever kind of ism you follow ISM means mindlessness

it's very important that human societies function out of their intelligence not

just out of external tendencies that are going on right now they will come and go

home there will be a certain segment of society which does that but pushing the

larger segment of society into that kind of a more clearly shows we are not

interested in the well-being of human beings we just want to sell something at

any cost and above all if you go by consumerism the only way you can sustain

this is you're determined to keep 1/2 of the population in abject poverty because

if 7.2 billion people who live on this planet have to have a life in terms of

consumerism an average American citizen has the living at statistic says that we

need four and a half planets to sustain this we only have half a planet left one

half is already taken with half a planet you are marketing for four and a half

planets this is a dangerous process the only way you can do this is one half of

the population should be kept in abject poverty so that others can go in

consumerism binge I think a more sensible way of living is possible this

does not mean you do not enjoy your life this does not mean you have don't have

things everybody can have what they need everybody can have what they can use but

just for the sake of satisfying somebody else's opinion who himself is mindless

if you go about digging up the planet because whether you take a phone or a

car or a spacecraft you can only dig it out of this planet we're going to dig

the Mars that's different but right now whether you make a safety pin or the

biggest machine on the planet you have to dig dirt I'm not trying to

render a an ecological message I'm talking about human beings this is like

the proverbial a punch it into the story where a man is sitting on the wrong side

of the branch and cutting it if he succeeds he will fail that's not good

if you succeed if you're going to fail this is happening successful people on

the planet not so much in India at it will come in

the Western world the most successful people do not carry the most joyful

faces okay they carry really tense and agitated faces so now we are sending out

a message to the younger generation success is suffering this is a very

wrong message if you do this what happened in the 60s in America will

happen everywhere the message was so clear that success is not worthwhile so

the younger generation chose they thought it's better to street sit on the

street side and smoke pot definitely it's at least we're happy that's the

philosophy of the youth that will come everywhere if you send out this message

that success is suffering success is the sweetest thing in human life it doesn't

matter whether we do small things or big things success is the most important

thing if success becomes suffering if a society gets this message that society

is for sure down the drain Society so consumerism creating a conscious

consumer who can pick and choose what he wants is different but mindless

consumerism is definitely pushing us in that direction I would I know all the

advertising Giants are here I would please request you in the

interest of your children and the future of the nation and the world it's very

important how we promote this

spiritualism also has an ism against if it's an ism that is also mindless where

do you see the balance see when the bar is set rolling today I'm sure that if I

was to replace some of the mothers out here that refrain from pushing your

child into this that the other I'm sure all of you'll throw me out of the house

because the ball has got rolling there are other students in the class they

want their child to be better than the others so the question then is no only

till they're 12 years of age after that they're doing their own thing

true but I'm saying that if in a society which around the world is moving in that

direction what are the few suggestions that you would give to people to try and

bring that sense of balance that you're talking about India still largely the

parents are still pushing their children towards a certain educational

qualification because survival is still a strong force accepting as a thin

veneer of society which has gone beyond survival the larger part of India is

still striving for survival in most families still somehow get to the

engineer and get to the medicine get to a something because survival survival

mode is still strong that should not last forever but when a conscious mode

comes when survival is not the big issue when conscious mode comes at least now

there are no compulsions when survival mode was on there is a certain

compulsion everybody became doctors whether they liked it or not everybody

becomes IT engineer whether they like it or not because survival but once the

survival mode is over the the blessing of being beyond survival can

sans is that you can choose you want to create another level of compulsiveness

this is madness this is sheer madness when survival is in question everything

is by compulsion the dictates of survival will determine what you should

do and what you should not do or what you can do or what you cannot do where

if you will escape that but once the dictates of survival are gone you're off

the survival mode this is the time when you should consciously choose this is

not a time to imitate other people this is not a time to take mass decisions

this is a time individual people can flower because their sense of human life

is that individual human beings can grow to their full potential if that doesn't

happen you have degraded the humanity you have taken away the possibility of

what those individual human beings could be our education systems are still in

that mode these education systems were created so that you could be a cog in

the larger machinery of Industry or business or whatever they have created

reducing a human being into your cog who serves a certain machine is once again

only significant as long as survival is in question once that's taken care of in

a society it should not exist but unfortunately we try to fix them into a

different machine when you have children you must understand first of all you

must understand children don't belong to you

they don't come from you they only come through you you must understand the

privilege that another life passes through you and becomes real you must be

always grateful and see it as a privilege this is not a time to exercise

your right of property he's not your property an individual human being

cannot be your property it is not for you to fulfill all your unfulfilled

dreams through your children yes it is not for you to drive them in any

particular harness them in any particular way no

does it mean to say you just leave them so the question is if I don't influence

them somebody else on the street will influence him somebody else in the

school will influence him so better I influence him in terms of the best thing

you could do with your children is it's okay we're going off the advertising

track we'll come back to that when you when you have children one thing is the

moment a child arrives a whole lot of parents think it's time to teach I want

to ask you a simple question between you and your child if the child is below ten

years of age between you and your child who is more joyful you or the child the

child then you please tell me who should be a consultant for life the miserable

one or the joyful one so in the process of so-called growing up people have

become so rigid they smile once in five days

laughter happens when they get drunk only only drunken laughter you hear you

don't hear simple joyful laughter in many places so they have become like

this when a child comes unknowingly without knowing why you laugh you crawl

under the sofa you do this and that you learn to throw a ball properly you do

things things which concern life which would have never done by yourself simply

because this bundle of joy is arrived in your family and it's a privilege it's

not for you to shape it and twist it and make it like you or not make it like you

your business is only to protect it from every influence this is the best thing

you can do people keep asking me said guru how is it that a whole range of

things you can do and you know how is it so the thing is I remain uneducated it's

not an easy task I want you to understand because from the first moment

you are born your parents teachers adults just about everybody in the world

is trying to teach you a whole lot of things that never worked in their lives

yes they're even telling you where God lives his address his children

children's names his birth today everything they know but they don't know

a damn thing about themselves so a whole lot of things if you can keep your child

just the way he was born and active intelligence no conclusions you would do

the best thing for him believe me but you won't agree because he would like to

influence him with is advertisement a difficult thing where do you draw the

line between survival and Judaism like for instance in our country

there's a whole lot of emerging rule middle class where do did or denied

they're looking at you they're looking at your cards

so how do you where do you draw the line what is survival I think it was survival

when a man lived in a cave then he wanted some more air so he made a window

then slowly made a garden then he made bedrooms and bathrooms where does it end

now do you call it consumerism or do you call it

betterment of lifestyle or where is it stop I don't know

see right now our standards have become like this everybody wants to do what

America does if all the Americans put carbon dioxide in their water and drink

it everybody drinks it and say so this is the real thing

even a kindergarten child knows this body does well with oxygen not with

carbon dioxide if all the Americans wear only blue trousers everybody in the

world across the world in blue trousers if all if all if all the Americans tear

their pants in their knees everybody tears their pants in their knees and

walks around so knowingly or unknowingly we have promoted America to a leadership

position so because we're just imitating that we need to understand America

evolved as a nation in a completely different kind of geography in a

different kind of atmosphere the people who went as the first today they called

us of what the fathers of founding fathers or whatever these were not the

elite of United Kingdom these were not the most educated people who were

treated very badly segregated in many ways who could not have a good life here

risked their lives to go across the oceans it's not like today of few

hundred years ago going at across Atlantic is as good as leaving the world

people took that risk because the life here was so bad and so without

possibility so when these people went the first thing is they saw a lush

limitless land for somebody who lived on a small island America and North America

is a limitless amount of land so they went and the only way was to splurge

everything from water to land agriculture everything that they built

they built supersize because they were just working out their poverty states

that they had there this happens in every society but unfortunately that

culture grew in the same way and the whole world is taking to it is it right

or wrong I am NOT questioning the morality of it I am only questioning the

practicality of it I am NOT saying which is right which is wrong

but I can leave whichever way they want so if all of us want to live whichever

way we want at least we must have this much in the beginning of 20th century

we were only 1.6 billion people today we have 7.2 billion people the United

Nations predicts that by 2050 we'll be nine point six billion people if we

really want to splurge and do whatever we want at least we must reduce our

population as a generation if you do not produce children at least that way you

can do your consumerism whatever you want you want billions of people to grow

and then consume this is suicide this is nothing else but suicide so

instead of leaving it to the predictions and saying by 2050 we'll be close to 10

billion people if we consciously aim by 2050 we'll be 3.5 billion people not by

killing anybody just by postponing the reproduction process if you do that you

know you don't have to express so much concern about what individual people are

doing and another thing is if people are little there is more space in the world

the need to imitate somebody will be much less this is happening because we

are all cramped up in one place what somebody does immediately affects us and

suddenly we look higher low so we have to upgrade our stuff to immediately if

there was little more space you will see the whole consumerism process will come

down there is all packed up in cities like this in one apartment houses there

are 500 people living if one kid carries this one everybody wants to carry that

one little more space would do that but that space is only possible if you work

in the population right now this whole discussion we are trying to work on

human aspirations we will never succeed these only I'm talking but we will never

succeed you cannot control human aspirations but you can control human

population for sure now I think a lot of us are

confronted with this kind of question very often by more evolved people that

advertising actually promotes considerable consumerism what is your

take on that because I personally believe if somebody is making something

and somebody is willing to buy something then we are doing a fairly good job I I

don't believe advertising is the basis of consumerism probably sensible

advertising definitely creates a conscious consumer maybe I don't know

much about this looking at the I only look at the news channels so looking at

the retiring process in the news channels I would say only about 15 to 20

percent is kind of mindlessly pushing people towards something others are more

trying to create a choice that one can choose 15% is not going to be so

corrupting it used to be commissioned earlier not coming to advertising you

are a master communicator yourself and I think it's our opportunity for you for

us to hear your views because you actually don't even have a physical

product and yet there are millions over running after you to get don't know

you're a master communicator or at least can say hello would you like

my specs see nice pecs better than that ones so I've got something to sell you

have nothing tangible physical not not tangible physical

I appreciate the correction so brilliantly now where I am relating this

question to our part of the world is that there is I have going to be on that

how you say it is as important as what you say whereas in our business there

are many people particularly clients please listen carefully who are only

interested in the what and they sell quick why don't you reduce this scenario

this is not selling the product whereas some of us believe out here that the how

is more as important if not more important than the word now you have

said so many things and said them so beautifully you are a master storyteller

so can we hear your views on the what and the how

can I tell you a story Shankaran Pillai

Shankaran Pillai was a compulsive bridge player every day in the evening he and

four of his friends gathered and every day they played bridge and they played

for money some stakes and that day the stakes went up one of the friends in a

single hand Lao lost $1,000 and in two minutes he clutched his heart had a

heart attack fell there right there and died so all

the remaining four friends $2 they played the game standing out of respect

for the departed friend

then after the game was over now somebody has to convey this news to his

wife so nobody wanted to do this so they picked Lots and then Shankaran Pillai

got the thing they picked the cards and he got it so he had to go they said see

you have to do this well you have to do this really discreetly this is not like

you just go and say you your husband is dead you cannot say that you have to say

properly Shankaran Pillai said don't worry I am

really discretion itself I'm the embodiment of discretion you don't worry

about me so he went went home and not on the door

the wife came and she opened the door with the security chain and asked what

aggressive he said you know I am a friend of your husband all the more what

so he said your husband lost $1,000 in a single hand today she screamed at him

ask him to drop dead I will convey the message to him fantastic so now how you

say it is most important it's more important than what you say many times

because what you say even if it's the most profound thing can be misunderstood

and distorted in no time in other people's minds great things have caused

enormous damage to people and the larger humanity simply because of the way it's

been set the religions of the world have caused much damage to humanity much

bloodshed and much pain more pain than anything else on the planet probably

simply because of the way it's been said what has been said is not really the

problem the way it's been said has caused all this pain and suffering so

how you say it is extremely important first of all we need to understand when

we say something if you speak whether you're in the advertising business or

otherwise if you speak you must if you make it this way that your speech is

about the people or the person that you're talking to right now

it's not about you if you are a compulsive speaker that you must speak

then it's a different kind of ailment but if you are if you say I am

communicating what does it mean it's about the person the way they get it

not about the way I say it the way they want to get it is most important so if

you understand this one thing whenever you speak it is always about the person

who is sitting in front of you it's not about you

then you will say it well I wanted to hear it from you but they

don't listen to me that brings me to on the how in our business how is actually

the area of emotions and the product is the area of practical I actually read

something if tears of love joy and ecstasy have not washed your cheeks you

are yet to taste life I want you to elaborate on that the role of emotion

the how in communication if you right now if you're walking out the hall and

if you see somebody standing there tears coming the normal conclusion in a

society like this would be maybe they're suffering something some pain some

suffering tears and pain have gotten too linked up in most societies tears have

nothing to do with pain if any experience of life becomes truly intense

tears will come but for most human beings the deepest experience that they

have is pain so they have linked pain and tears together

if you become very joyful tears will come if you become very loving tears

will come ecstasy will bring tears even anger brings tears shame brings tears if

anything crosses a certain level of intensity of experience if you just look

at something if a visual image without any emotion is very intense tears will

come it is not necessary there must be an emotion behind it it is the intensity

which brings tears if you are not known life in its as much intensity as

possible if life has not overwhelmed you who what the hell what are you doing

here if life and the process of life does not overwhelm you why are we alive

really if aliveness has touched you you will

see if you if you sit in a certain state of meditativeness just the peacefulness

if you sit for two hours two hours it will be just going it is not because of

any emotion just the intensity of peacefulness but for most people they

love their joy the peacefulness is never so intense but their pain is intense if

you just prick yourself with a pin it goes to the core but the joy and other

things never touch like that because that is how people have structured

themselves this is what needs to change are you here to experience life or are

you here to avoid life this is a question with the there are two

fundamental forces that are constantly working within a human being one is the

instinct of self-preservation which is always telling you to put a strong

boundary around yourself that nobody can hurt you in harm you and whatever else

another is constantly wanting to expand every human being wants to expand

limitlessly they may not admit it right now they said just one more thing if it

happens everything will be fine if that one thing happens there will always be

one more thing and one more thing they believe in going towards the infinite in

installments approaching the infinite in installments is a hopeless method it is

never going to happen you cannot count one two three four five and one day say

it's in finite such a possibility does not arise if you want to approach the

infinite you must give up the one two three four five but the security of one

two three four five keeps people like this this is a mode where you have

gotten into your mode as to how to avoid life we

cause some experience of life your own or somebody else's has brought pain so

the best thing is to insulate yourself from life itself because life is the

source of pain you will notice this if at any time I have seen people I never

had a first-hand experience of these things fortunately because this has

always been my problem my parents my father always worried he

would say what will happen to this boy he has no fear in his heart

I never thought fear was a virtue why is fear a virtue

fear is the most debilitating emotion that a human being can go through but

that is considered a virtue even if you say divine even if you say

God you become god-fearing isn't it because somebody is out there to do

something to you all the time so we have thought fear will make life safe no the

only thing that makes your life safe is your sense not fear not fear will avoid

life if you become fearful the first thing that happens to you is you become

reckless because the boundary that you have established he is so effective now

even to breathe it becomes difficult you are in a cubicle where you cannot

breathe by yourself the first sign of paranoia is always breathlessness

because if you have to live you have to transact what the tree exhales you must

inhale what you exhale the tree must inhale the person may be your

mother-in-law is sitting next to you you hate her but what she exhales you must

inhale otherwise it's not going to work these boundaries are there only in your

psychological space the life space is not like that today modern physics is

telling you as you sit here every subatomic particle in this body is

reverberating with everything else in the cosmos it is no more a philosophy it

is an established science and this is something that we have

always known when we utter the word yoga because most of the yoga that you're

seeing today in India is rebound from the American coast so yoga means

contorting your body in some a impossible physical posture no the word

yoga means Union you experience lean oh that this existence is happening as one

whole enormous process so there's one dimension of you which is instinct of

self-preservation which wants to draw boundaries another dimension wants to

limitlessly expand are these two things against each other

contradict each other no one is concerned with the physicality the other

is concerned with the remaining part of who you are

whatever that is only the physical needs a boundary in fact the fundamentals of

physicality is a defined boundary you can call this a physical body only

because it has a boundary if I remove the boundaries of this body you cannot

call it physical anymore because the fundamental and the basis of physicality

is a defined boundary but there is something within you which is always

longing to be little more than who you are right now yes or no whoever you may

be how much ever you might have achieved you want to be little more than who you

are right now your currencies may be different one

person may be looking for fame another person may be looking for money another

person for wealth love knowledge whatever but everybody wants to be

something more if that's something won't happen something more I'm asking how

much more would settle you for good if you understand that the only way you can

settle this is this does not want something more it wants it all if you

won't have all it can't be physical in nature so if you realize this and if

your experience of life transcends the limitations of the physical now suddenly

all is yours because it is the boundary which made

you feel that you have to conquer that either you can conquer that or you can

dissolve into it conquering the cosmos is a stupid idea

isn't it dissolving into the cosmos is a

practical idea so this is what Yoga meant if this happens in the inner

experience of the human being that you feel limitless within yourself then you

don't have to worry about what is that what I think message consumerism know

everybody will do what they think is needed nothing more nothing less

every human being should do what is needed for his individual life nothing

more nothing less if you do less that means you will be inefficient if you do

more the excess is also leading to inefficiency you will not realize the

full potential of who you are so the intensity of experience comes within you

only when you address the longing to expand if you address the

self-preservation mode it will shut off everything the only tears you will know

is of pain suffering fear agitation frustration but if you empower the other

dimension of nature within you one dimension of nature is trying to put a

wall around yourself another wants to go limitless only when you touch that only

when your life is carried by that dimension of nature within you you will

see every leaf every flower an ant can bring tears to you I must tell you this

look I had a great grandmother who who people

in those days had she's a devil of a woman not because she did any evil to

anybody it's just that if she laughed the whole street would shake like that

she laughed in those days women were not supposed to laugh loudly like that I

don't know how people managed to live without women who cannot laugh it should

be tough but she is a woman who when he when she laughed everything around her

shook she lived up to 1 1 3 113 years of age when I met her she was over 100 so

at the age of 68 she moved out of the family structure by then she had buried

her husband she'd buried her many of her children a few grandchildren a few

great-grandchildren also she had buried she got married at the age of 14 and

over 100 years of age she had seen everybody through so at the age of 68 or

70 she moved out of the family she built a small place for herself and she grew

her own food and she lived by herself when we went there to the ancestral home

in the summer vacation she always came and I kind of hit it off with her in a

certain way because she was special I did not know what was special about her

I was just four or five years of age but with her you could do anything you

wanted so I liked it there were no rules with her I would see her somebody would

bring breakfast for her then she would go about giving this breakfast to the

ants to the sparrows all the sparrows are dead now - the sparrows and to the

squirrels most of her breakfast will be gone like this and people around her

self-appointed advisors would say you give away all your food to these

creatures and you will die like this all these advisors died

but she lived on many times have seen her she would just put this food to all

these ants and ants will be all eating she would be just sitting there with

tears streaking down her cheeks and if

somebody comes and reminds her why don't you eat she would say I'm full I thought

she's really emotional about these ends it took me another 25 years or 20 years

to come to this experience where how if you're truly connected you could be just

nourished by anything and everything around you it's not necessarily by

consumption so consumerism is not the way you connect with the existence

consumerism is not the way you experience life in its full depth and

dimension it is by inclusion that you know this so right now the the most what

to say rule him into the form of inclusion is to shop shopping is the

most of what is not yours you make it yours this seems to fulfill something

for a moment after some time it's once again the same thing it is not a

question of morality at all this is a question of am I here to somehow avoid

life or am I here to experience in no life in its fullest depth and dimension

when I say life at least this piece of life if you cannot know the whole cosmos

it doesn't matter before you fall dead at least this piece

of life you must know in its entirety otherwise you're a wasted life isn't it

I am I think you might have questions on consumerism but you can wait a little

bit I will not miss this opportunity or some other aspects of our business which

are not disabled business there's issues on life which I want you to that's one

of the things that I keep hearing from very young people 25 20 30 year old I'm

too stressed out even the 12 year olds insane 12 year olds are senior and here

also a bottle guru fuels you for it second one stress is not in your job

stress is your inability to manage your mind emotions and life energies please

tell me some nice way of communicating this to lots of young people in a

business I think lots of us would like to take that lesson and take it to the

kids say what one person feels as a great stress another person breezes

through the same situation isn't it true today in the country you look at the

Chopra see he stressed because there is no promotion in the job he wants to move

from Bandra to Malabar Hill promotion sleeping a different Street he's very

stressed to sweep his patch of the street not even the whole street we can

go like this right the top job the prime minister in between between the chapati

and the prime minister just about everybody including a school going child

is experiencing stress or in other words what they are saying is the statement is

life is stress when I first were the United States a few years ago wherever I

went people were talking about stress management I could not understand

because in my perception we will manage things which are precious to us

our family our business our wealth our money whatever else whatever is precious

to us why would anybody want to manage stress this is something I couldn't

figure it took me some time it took me some time to understand that these

people have made a conclusion that stress is a part of their life this is

not a part of your life as the quote you read out said if you knew how to keep

your mind for example if your mind took instructions from if your mind just does

whatever you want would you keep it stressful or blissful it's a question

for all of if your mind took instructions from you would you keep it

stressful or blissful that's your choice you must you must make the choice I'm

going to bless you right now it's very important you make the choice the

problem is most people have not made the choice they have not made a clear choice

so if the mind was taking instructions you would keep it blissful well you have

the answer your mind is not taking instructions from you

then who is it taking instructions from maybe your company's influencing them

maybe somebody else somebody else just about anybody just about anybody can

mess up your mind it doesn't take instructions from you it

is in a compulsive state of reaction it is not in a conscious state of action it

is in a compulsive state of reaction because your mind doesn't take

instructions from you it feels like such a great threat even to have a mind that

people are talking you must become a no mind or / yourself with some chemical

and be out for some time all these things is simply because mind is mind is

not working for you it's working against you any kind of suffering stressful Ness

anxiety anger it doesn't matter what you call it these are all different states

of unpleasantness in your mind any kind of unpleasantness in your mind means

your own intelligence is working against you there is an evolutionary reason for

this you know Charles Darwin told you you are a monkey at one time it's not my

statement no I I did not say that

Darwin told you you were a monkey and then you became a man and all this stuff

we know evolutionary process has happened on this planet for a goat to

become a giraffe it took so many million years for a pig to become an elephant it

took many many million years but for a monkey to become a human being it

happened too quickly yes to a point

whenever he doesn't like something he laughs it out it's better it's better to

a point where the anthropologist of the day are saying there is a missing link

somewhere because there are some jumps which are not logical

they have happened too rapidly there many reasons I will not go into the

scientific reasons why it happened so rapidly there are good scientific

reasons as to why it it just kind of picked up so much momentum the

evolutionary process but now what's happened is we have an intelligence for

which we don't have an appropriate platform unless you create a proper

platform your intelligence will torment you right now human beings are suffering

their own intelligence when you have a mind of this kind of breadth and

capability every human being has they kind of restricted

because the fear of suffering they think if their mind functions freely so much

suffering it will bring stress anxiety fear all kinds of things a stable base

is what is missing the spiritual processes particularly the yogic

practices when you when I say yoga do not think of impossible postures there

are various things to create a stable base a kind of base which can hold this

intelligence with ease if you do not do that in the evolution of intelligence

from monkey to man and in evolution of the body from monkey to man there is

there happen at different speeds the evolution of the mind and consciousness

has gone too rapidly the body has not gone so rapidly so because of this there

is a little bit of thing you have to do something with this you have to bring a

certain balance and stability into your system for you to enjoy this

intelligence otherwise this intelligence will turn against you and torment you in

a million different ways and that's what is happening which we are today calling

a stress people are saying my job is stress okay I'll have you fired will you

walk happily on the beach no you will be depressed if I give you a job you'll be

manic if you lose a job you'll be depressed people are trying to bring

stability into that life by making conclusions on everything you have to

become something you have to become an optimist you have to become a pessimist

you have to become a theist or an atheist or you become a Hindu or a

Muslim or whatever you have to become something to become stable because this

is identity based stability the moment you identify yourself with something

whatever it may be the moment you identify yourself with something your

mind will function only around that whatever you're identified with once

mind is functioning only around that it becomes like a whirlpool of its own if

you washed in a river the river is moving rapidly towards the ocean

there will be a whirlpool here this whirlpool goes nowhere it is always in

the same place this is the nature of the whirlpool so the moment you identify

yourself with something that you are not when I say something that you are not

the very physical body that you carry is an accumulated body isn't it it is it is

a piece of the planet that you gathered slowly or a period of time you must get

this now if you don't get this now from me one day you'll get it from the

maggots and that's not of much use right now you know that this is just a piece

of the planet that you picked up if you get identified with this your mind

functions only around this this body is everything because this body is

everything whatever concerns this body all those bodies become something this

is the bane of our country right now this is a death rush to syndrome you

remember so basically what you're saying is that it is you have to take things as

they exist but you have to use your imagination this is what I am saying

don't draw a conclusion conclusion is depth isn't it awareness is life I am an

optimist means tomorrow is going to be a great day pessimist means tomorrow there

may be a lot of trouble tomorrow this may happen that may happen but the

reality is tomorrow has not come so you don't know what the hell it's going to

be we will plan for tomorrow but you really don't know what it is isn't it

yes or no it doesn't matter how many predictions you have how much guesswork

you have still you do not know what tomorrow is you actually you do not know

what next five minutes is isn't it so reality of life is just this we have

a whole lot of ideas based on the past experience of life they may go well in a

few times but there's always a possibility something else could happen

always that is the reality of life if you make a conclusion that this is

the way it's going to be you miss the experience of life because you concluded

all these conclusions are because one way or other we want to take away the

uncertainty of life we want to conclude people want to conclude there is God

there is no God there is like this like that 80s and these are just people who

need that have the courage now the commitment to seek what is true so this

is why you must understand in this land the fundamental ethos of this culture

has been that this is a land of seekers never a land of believers in the same

family fire people can worship fire different gods because we have

understood the technology of God making yes yes we know how to create forms

which will work for us and we know very well we created it and there is a

certain process called Ishta devatha that means you can choose your god of

your liking there are 33 million gods and goddesses you have a choice but if

you don't like any of them you can make your own really if you worship the tree

in your garden nobody in india things you gone crazy okay

somewhere else they'll report you yes it is it is so you worship a small rock on

the street side nobody thinks you're crazy okay you relate to that it's fine

with me you worship the clouds in the sky perfectly fine because whatever you

relate to you make it your God because anyway we know you made it up we are

conscious that we made it up some people have lost that awareness that they made

it up yes and this is very important does it mean to say there is nothing

beyond us well before we came here the planet was here the cosmos was here

after we are dead it'll be here so obviously we didn't make it nor are we

running it definite there is something bigger than us but

not the way we imagine because this imagination is coming from a certain

obnoxiousness that the cosmos is human centric the cosmos is not human centric

we are just a small happening in this creation we also have a place but the

the world and the existence is not centered around us this is a very

obnoxious conclusion we have made because of these kind of conclusions we

become this or that why is it so necessary to make a conclusion because

our well-being is not coming from our awareness our well-being is coming from

conclusions that we have made it gives us a certain sense of certainty that I

belong to this party or that party I am willing to look every moment and see

which is the best thing to do right now no no no that seems too uncertain but

whatever you do whatever Arrangements you make whatever conclusions you make

the reality will get you the way it gets you all right yes or no in any way get

you one way or the other if you are in touch with reality if you are in tune

with reality you can handle these things gracefully life and death you can handle

gracefully otherwise if you are an optimist you will go towards still as

long as a few things are working you're okay after that you will be frustrated

if you're a pessimist we don't have to tell you you've already given up on

everything is it true that your body when you were born it was only this much

and slowly you gathered it is it true why is it so difficult to say yes

yeah so you gathered this body what you call as your mind is this is an

accumulation of the food that you've eaten what you call as your mind is an

accumulation of the impressions that you have taken in from whatever exposures

you have in the world so your body's an accumulation your mind is an

accumulation whatever you accumulate at the most you can claim it is mine if you

say it is me it amounts to insanity suppose I suddenly pick up this vessel

and say this is my wrestle they will think oh he said guru's got

some problem with the vessel but everybody says is wise let's listen some

more after some time I say this is me then you will say let's go this

unfortunately you're doing everyday the food that you eat appears on your plate

you said this is my food you eat it and said this is me this is a socially

accepted level of insanity okay yes it's socially accepted but if you

believe something that is not you as yourself it amounts to insanity is it

even medically you will call a father now consumerism or becoming a

consumerist there is no such thing you must only consume what you can digest

not only physically in every other way if you consume more than what you can

handle it will only lead to destruction this you know very well with your body

but that is the same thing with true with everything

so this consumerism means instead of human consciousness directing the human

commerce activity right now we are letting commerce direct

human consciousness this is a dangerous way to live and it is definitely not a

sustainable way to live I'm not only saying ecologically even as human beings

we will not be able to sustain our basic human nature if we go this way for too

long right now a few people are trying to push but you must understand a whole

lot of people I'm sure it is true in this hall and everywhere the moment

their retirements come they switch it off and go and attend to their this and

that yes a few things they may watch rest of it people will try to avoid

because it is it has become a certain onslaught of you must do this you must

do that it is only initially it is working after

that people will only see what they want to see what they need they're not going

to watch everything and get excited about it

that's not true that is only true with a certain juvenile mind everybody else

will see only what they want to see your advertising Rolls Royce a whole lot of

people may see ok it's a beautiful car but they never think I must get a Rolls

Royce a whole lot of people will not think there are very few people a

certain segment of people who will drool oh I wish I had it not everybody else a

whole lot of people think it's an impractical car to buy there buy

something else what is suitable for their life and their lifestyle and

everything else so what I'm saying is this thing about somebody is a

consumerist somebody is a spiritual person there is no such thing what you

have right now as a body and mind both accumulated if you accumulated all

this what you accumulate cannot be you isn't it by any standards what you

accumulate at the most can be yours it cannot be you so if you accumulate this

much body and this much mind there must be something more fundamental about you

which is beyond this body in this mind if you touch that we say your spiritual

once your spiritual your consumption becomes

conscious

For more infomation >> NOW CHANGE YOUR MINDSET to Fulfilling Expectations - Sadhguru Meditation - Duration: 1:04:41.

-------------------------------------------

Beautiful Tawang City Walk | Arunachal Pradesh India HD - Duration: 5:50.

Tawang is one of the main city of Arunachal Pradesh State of India

you can get private vehicle from Tezpur and Guwahti for Tawang

Tawang population is about 10000

It is situated on hills

Its 10000 feet from sea leval

October to March is good time to Visit Tawang

you can also get snow fall in Dec-January

local transport is costly and there are many things nearby Tawang

Madhuri lake, Tawang monastery, Bumla etc

Tawang is surrounded by China and Tibet border

Many tourist visit here in winter as well as summer for holidays

This is area of old market in Tawang Arunachal pradesh

All the main things like hotel, travel booking, food, grocery you can get here

Old market and nehru market, both are close to each other

For more infomation >> Beautiful Tawang City Walk | Arunachal Pradesh India HD - Duration: 5:50.

-------------------------------------------

Top 20 Bản Nhạc EDM Max Hay | Nhạc Điện Tử Gây Nghiện Cho Game Thủ | ZIN - Duration: 1:14:54.

For more infomation >> Top 20 Bản Nhạc EDM Max Hay | Nhạc Điện Tử Gây Nghiện Cho Game Thủ | ZIN - Duration: 1:14:54.

-------------------------------------------

Kuinka vaihtaa takapyörän laakerit MERCEDES-BENZ B W245 -merkkiseen autoon [OHJEVIDEO AUTODOC] - Duration: 7:05.

Use a combination spanner №16

Use a torx №T30

Use a socket №E14

Lubricate the brake disc seat with copper spray

For more infomation >> Kuinka vaihtaa takapyörän laakerit MERCEDES-BENZ B W245 -merkkiseen autoon [OHJEVIDEO AUTODOC] - Duration: 7:05.

-------------------------------------------

Liberty Chronicles, Ep. 52: The Dismal Science (with Steve Horwitz) - Duration: 36:09.

Steve Horowitz is the distinguished professor of free enterprise at Ball

State University's Economics Department he has a PhD in economics from George

Mason and his most recent book is Hayek's modern family classical

liberalism and the evolution of social institutions in the interest of more

clearly identifying the relationship between his highly theoretical

discipline and our evolving set of humane histories here on Liberty

chronicles professor Horowitz joins us now

welcome to Liberty chronicles a project of libertarianism.org I'm Anthony come

agna so Steve Horowitz you're an economist what use have you found for

reading history oh I think there's there's so many and I think one of the

great things one of the great flaws in graduate education and economics these

days is that that that young economists don't read enough history for me when I

think about what two things I think one of the things economics does is to help

us explain history right that it becomes a theoretical framework that we can use

to understand the world as it has been in the world has been both in the

distant past but recently as well I think in some sense one of the whole

purposes of economics is to be able to tell those historical stories but I also

think when we I mean you know good economics or economics rightly done

recognizes that there's a small core of things that are sort of universally true

that economists talk about but we want to apply those to the world we need to

know what the institutional framework is like what the actors were thinking at

the time right all of those things economics by itself economic theory by

itself can't explain much of anything and what what what economists need

history historians in history for is to sort of fill in those details and help

us figure out how our theory applies and why the story that we want to tell in

the historians want to tell might have relevance so it's both the the purpose

of economics but in some sense you can't even you can't even tell a full economic

story without all of that institutional detail with all of that sense of what

people were thinking why they acted the way they did and so on mm-hm

even a you know simple example like how much do you like chocolate ice cream

versus vanilla ice cream is full of all sorts of historical baggage and details

that go into decision making sure right and and again if we want to understand

you know the economists question might be wide wide has you know one flavor of

ice cream cost more than the other right knowing that sort of thing right and

sort of understanding all of that history and institutional detail is what

we have to bring to the party to be able to have those economic

explanations now I'm curious about some of the economist culture here ya know no

one should be furious well in morbidly curious in economics departments how do

they talk about historians how do they think about that discipline in relation

to their own I think that's that's a really interesting question I think you

know part of the problem of having been a sort of George Mason graduate and sort

of in the world of kind of Austrian Virginia political economies I think we

tend to be much more respectful about history and historians than many of our

colleagues do I think then I think the real answer isn't kind of your economist

off the street doesn't pay that much attention to history at all they're busy

model building and and sort of trying to you know come up with an answer to a

puzzle that often abstracts away from the questions that historians finding

I'll just give you one example I had this exchange in a economic journal

watch with gaudiya Gerson who's a big macro economist over the Great

Depression and one of the things that was driving me bonkers in this exchange

was that he had this interesting model and sort of was trying to explain why

you know by the depression linger and and all this and and yet he was either

ignorant of or ignoring important historical details that I think made

that model not nearly as applicable or at least suggested that it was

problematic in some significant ways that he just didn't see but I think that

so many economists got so fascinated by the model and the the sort of aesthetics

of that mathematical model on one end that they don't pay attention the

history on the other end you know you start playing with data and you start

running regressions and you're you know the danger there of course is always

you're just whatever comes up with the strongest correlation the biggest

r-squared whatever you're looking for becomes the thing right and and you're

not actually paying any attention to the to the sort of primary sources right and

to sort of digging into it what do people think what do people say what did

how did they perceive this particular you know set of set of issues at

economics conferences did they have some choice words for historians in the you

know the open bar setting nah you know it's interesting I not it's not him it's

not historians that tenant you know it's like sociologists who tend to be this

the target group I think I think I think historians are sort of neutral it's you

know it's there I don't think they're seen often as a positive nuisance but

but the problem is that they're not they're not seen as a as a benefit right

as some as a group that we should be talking to and engaging with and again

some of the best work in economics I think has been you know they're really

really good economic historians who are willing to dig into that whatever one

thinks or the particulars I mean you know

McClosky Joanne will cure I'm gonna keep going even even the minute Barry

Eichengreen even working the depression I mean all of these folks have done this

kind of really good work and I think among the sort of you know friends of

mine you know Bob Higgs has worked for examples here's this here's someone who

who is not afraid to go digging into history and really in the ways that

historians do and to just not doesn't think that the traditional economic

variable sort of speak for themselves and I think that's the important thing

to me is really going to get in my firm a colleague of mine has a new book out

on has been writing on unsorted the economic effects of race and and he has

just deep into he's an economist right but he's dug deep into these primary

sources you know things like wills and and legal documents and so on to sort of

get at this stuff and it's to me that's amazing work and and I think that's what

we need more of - telling telling historical stories when the for people

who are sort of sympathetic to markets and classical liberalism

I think one of the reasons that our ideas have struggled is that we have not

been able to tell good historical stories we've lost the battle over

interpretations of history and the best example of this is the Great Recession

up comes a Great Recession and everyone reaches into their pocket and pulls out

their old high school history Great Depression narrative which we know from

historians and economists others is problematic but there it was right all

of a sudden we're back to this sort of you know Hoover stood by and did nothing

FDR did you know did all these wonderful things that we're all motivated by sort

of you know modern deficit I mean no no we the story is much more interesting

and complicated than that and the bad guys are are more evenly distributed

right but but everyone's you know everyone reached right into their pocket

for that narrative and I think that's that's a problem and I think telling

better historical stories which is why McCluskey's work you know maybe it

didn't take three volumes but but I'm glad she did cuz

it's a it's a glorious story whatever it's whatever its flaws in its details I

have to say it sounds it sounds like economists feel better about historians

than historians do about a concept that's probably you know I notice I

didn't ask what you guys say say the bar but but I suspect it's probably a fair

coatings are fair criticisms right I think it's the same kinds of criticisms

that you and Austrian would have for mainstream economics right it's all top

down with you know like you said model making and basically imposing behavior

right past as opposed to you know investigating from the bottom up and

building narratives of stories that way right and and I think for me you know

those of us who were friends with my good friend Pete Becky sometimes

referred to the good Pete and the bad Pete and and what we mean by that is

that that I think those of us who are who are Austrians and who are deep into

economics at one level we really like those sort of rational choices stories

right and think about Pete Leeson's work here for example right where we want to

say you know there's a peromyscus yes we can reinterpret all these historical

things as people just you know maximizing subject to constraint and I

don't think that's a I don't think there's that's automatically wrong I

think it's useful to start thinking that way but then I think one has to say okay

is this just a sort of just so story right dude let's really go in and look

at the primary sources and see is it really was it really this way and I

think if you can back it up those ways and you've got a really interesting

story and if you don't right then you got something interesting as well but

that's gonna be more complicated now since you brought up Pete listen let me

say he was on the show some while ago a couple dozen episodes ago now and we

talked about pirates of course and I I'm not totally sold on this point of his

and maybe you can sell me on it people are so incredibly bizarre and the

more you the more you look into them and study them at an intense like for you

know eight hours a day sort of level for years on end you just are swept away in

their bizarreness they're so weird they have strange ideas strange notions about

causality and you know the nature of the universe

strange ideas about forces that transcend what we can measure and

observe directly and things like that and it just seems so bizarre the way

people behave sometimes what their motivations are they're totally foreign

to us especially the further in the past you go and you know it strikes me that

we might not be able to call these people rational utility maximizers in

all these cases some pirates had totally joined up because they had a death wish

they were driven to this point of you know I don't know

not quite insanity with something very close they're right there on the border

being pushed and pushed and pushed and pushed by the world constantly maybe

they're not trying to maximize utility and yeah I saw so here's my view of

these things I think I think when you see a practice surviving for some

significant period of time I think it's not a bad sort of first cut to say there

there must be something to this there must be some you know sort function

elapsed Tory that you can tell that this process this institution this behavior

has survived you think about some of the stuff in police ins new book right and

so as a first cut saying you know what let's try to understand this as rational

behavior and maybe maybe we can understand it that is survive that way I

think even if you can construct a good explanation there that doesn't

necessarily mean every actor involved with it is therefore behaving the

rationality is sort of built into the process into the system into the

institution that it's solving some social problem even if the actors

themselves might be in it for the wrong reason I mean the wrong you know sort of

right that the non-rational in the way that you're you're talking reason so I

think that's the really tricky part for for good subtle economists is to kind of

navigate that that distinction and say you know this is sort of Vernon Smith's

kind of ecological rationality story right that these that these practices

and things sort of have survival value to them and that it's not so much that

we are rational but that we be cut we we engage in what amounts to rational

problem-solving because we operate within institutional frameworks that

give us the the information and the incentives we need to solve whatever

that problem is and so sort of moving back and forth between the

the perspective of the actor and that systemic perspective which is I think

what good historians do to write it sort of becomes a way to not have to commit

to all everybody's a calculating machine sort of story

but in any case whatever people are doing their experiences come from you

know a long string and it's basically built from the bottom up again right

right and as if you do enough digging you you know come to understand pretty

clearly why people are doing the things they're doing

I do think it's I think one of the things that you know when you understand

economics and a little bit of cognitive psych and these sorts of things you kind

of recognize it look at some level human beings share some stuff right I mean

we're products of that same evolutionary process we've got sort of you know the

sort of if you want to use these metaphors the hardware of our brains

right share a lot of things but we also all go through unique life experiences

and we know from how the brain operates the brain has plasticity and people

change and they think differently as they as they move along and I think

again finding out where those universals are and where those you know called

human nature if you want but whatever want to call it right where those

universals are and then where the unique pieces of human beings are and sort of

using that as our way to look at the world I think is is the way to go here

and I think a good subtle economics can handle that I'm not sure mainstream

economics has the subtlety the subtlety of a sledgehammer right to not to do

that well so then what do you think really is the relationship between our

two disciplines here I think they inform each other I I don't

think it's interesting that you're asked this question by the way having I'm in

the process of rereading Mises as human actions cover-to-cover for the first

time since maybe graduate school so I've been thinking a lot about these

questions so so I think you know in amis se in vein economics you you can't I

don't think you can do good history without some understanding of economics

on the other hand I don't think you can economics become sterile if it doesn't

have history and forming it and and and history as the sort of thing it wants to

explain right and and by history here I include the you know the the very recent

past we call policy applications and things like that right so I think there

is the relationship and I think you know

there's a the division of labor here is is is a economists have to learn from

historians and read history I mean if you know I look at getting graduate

students I want to say you want to do a dissertation go first thing you should

do is go read a bunch of history about this thing right figure out how whatever

this event or this thing how it came to be how it works then as you read think

about how might the tools of economics help you tell a story about this event

or this period or whatever this thing is that others haven't told or that adds

something to it that others haven't told and so I think you can't do that without

the history on the other hand you can't do without the economics either so I

think in a healthy if it were a healthy relationship right each side would

recognize you know that that aspect of the other but again I you know I speak

here as someone who does unorthodox economics and I think you know if you

sort of grabbed a random economist off the street I think the answer is more

you know yeah I read some history on the side but I'm not I'm not sure what it

does you know or to them history is simply econometrics right

and all we do with history is we go out and we look you know we find this

statistical data and we look for we look for correlations and we hope we have a

theory to explain them and I think that's you know again that that's not

valueless but it's certainly not it doesn't allow us to get inside and sort

of understand the actors point of view to engage in that kind of hermeneutic

that that sort of interpreting and explaining behavior and its consequences

intended and unintended can the facts of history overturn the laws of economics

oh that's the big question isn't it and here here's where I you know I become a

kind of hardcore Austrian and say not the that's sort of core of propositions

and I think it's a fairly small number I I wrote about this for Cato unbound back

in 2012 and a whole thing on proxy ology in history that several us are part of

and I think there's a small core of ideas that that are really truths about

how humans that are sort of either hardwired into us or truths about how

humans behave in the world that history and other sort of things can't overturn

we can't even sort of make sense of the role without them but once you get

outside that however everything becomes in some sense

institutionally contingent right and and so there you know we learn things from

history we can learn things from cognitive psych we can I think the

behavioral economics revolution has made us think about some things right so we

can learn from other disciplines about where about you know sort of where that

line is I do think you know it's an interesting counterfactual I think Mises

for example and other perhaps you know economists who liked his work 75 years

ago 100 years ago would have had a broader scope of things that they

thought and certainly even today there are sort of I would you know more

rothbard II and Austrians who would put a lot of things into that a priori you

know box I think a careful reading of Mesa suggests is not as many as that but

it's not zero right and I think I think you know we can't we would it's a this

is what when Mises and others talk about that AA priori it's that organizing

framework we can't even begin to understand the world not just as

economists or historians but as actors we can't even understand the world until

we have until we recognize that there's those those universals that are just

truisms about how humans perceive and organize the world so then if you think

that you see somebody in the historical record pursuing their less valued once

first does that mean the economics is wrong or if we severely misinterpreted

the record right I think it's the latter I think you know the economists first

instinct is to say okay something more complicated is happening there we're

missing some piece of a historical puzzle or some piece of historical

information that would help us make sense of this right again I think you

know all the the stuff that that Leeson's doing in the in the new book is

sort of this you know looking at these things that seems so irrational on first

glance right but in fact we can explain rationally that's it's fun and it's

counterintuitive and all that but but but I think it's important too that we

at least you know interrogate those things that seem to not follow what we

imagine what economists imagine how people behave and ask ourselves is this

really the case and that gets us into I think looking closely at the details to

see whether or not it is I just you know I think there's a sense in which when we

understand both the economics here but some of the cognitive stuff and and you

know I think reading things like Hayek sensory order and so

we think about how brains work and how Minds work I've been reading Daniel

Dennett these days to this notion that we we have these principles that

organize the world for us right and that sort of things that are that are in that

core of economic theory are might be part of that that simply can't be

overturned because they're they're just built into how we perceive the world so

his historian should read at least let's say Austrian economics well not everyone

should well sure I think that would be an interesting it would be an

interesting exercise for me to sort of look I mean two things I think one for

historians to read through Austrian economics but also to look at the kind

of applied and historical work that Austrians have been doing for the last

thirty years does you know I mean I think one of the may rest in peace down

the boys one of his great contributions was to encourage us we were there at

George Mason in the mid late 80s to do this kind of work say you know what you

got to do history you got to go out and get your fingers dirty in the archives

or in this Center than that right and tell better stories and you look at the

dissertations that were produced under Don they were for the most part these

kind of applied historical we want to overturn a tale type story type you know

bits of economic history and I think that was really really valuable you can

you know it led it to all kinds of debates about the nature of economics

it's one but you strip away those debates some of which were I think a

folly of youth the core point of what economics is forced to go out and

explain the world outside the window and to tell better historical narratives

right yes and at the same time that McCluskey was working on the rhetoric of

economics and this whole argument that would in fact it is all about better and

worse storytelling and you can kind of see how all that stuff was coming

together mouths you know 30 plus years ago yeah I mean if you go to you know

IHS events or libertarian conference or whatever you can barely tell the

difference between a professional economist and a professional historian

they they do the same thing right basically right right and and you know I

just finished this book a couple years ago on the on the family and there was I

mean the fun part for me was was reading all the history right I mean there was I

can wasn't always fun I can think of a couple days where I spent reading these

you know histories of 18th century families and and and how you know the

sort of lives of children and how dealt with their kids or families I was

like okay enough now right right but but sort of that to me was the really

interesting part and and and the intellectual excitement of that whole

project working on family stuff for me came from that ability say look here's

people telling stories that I think are good stories but I can add to those

stories because I have this understanding of these economic ideas or

these broader things that that can come to it that the historian is doing this

work didn't have right and so you're building off that story but you're

adding to it and really well for me we're intellectually exciting ways no I

I have to sort of propositions that I want you to evaluate something I've

gotten from studying Austrian economics is the idea of marginal value and

utility here all value is established on the margins or in the marginal units of

something and I think that in a way all historical change happens on the margins

on the margins of society you know marginal considerations that people make

during their day every time they're choosing to change their condition

they're doing so based on margin marginal valuations marginal populations

usually end up making the biggest difference is the most profound

revolutionary changes or what have you what do you think about that yeah I

think that I think that's right it seems to me right that you know I think this

is so so this is argue perhaps one reason why you know Tyler Cowen and Alex

Tabb rock named their blog marginal revolution my friend Tom Bell has been

known to say that he's in favor of revolution and then pause at the margin

right and I think it and I think there's a profoundly important point there that

you cannot engage in wholesales social change you just you can't swap out one

set of institutions for another a very Austrian point right that that

institutions evolve and that any social change that we want to push for is going

to be I think you know evolutionary not revolutionary it's true I think that

there are sometimes crisis points you know where where we we reach a turning

point and we find ideas on the shelves to use Friedman's in a sort of image

that come in and and and and can have a kind of turning point but

even there you're never gonna replace I mean we've saw in the 20th century what

happens when you try to replace institutions wholesale and I do think

equally going the other way right I mean if we think about moving towards a freer

Society it's not as though we can just you know kind of rip out all the wires

at once we have to think carefully about how to get from here to there and and

and you're not going to change people's ideas all at once right it's it's you

know persuading people of the value of markets and and and limited government

and so on itself happens on the margin by multiple exposure you know two good

stories and good ideas so so yeah I think that's right I think one of the

again sort of follies of youth is that you're impatient and you think you can

make change happen quickly and I think the older I get the more patient I am

and part of me is somewhat sad about that because I'd like to see change a

bit more quickly but at the same time I think it's just the reality of existing

in a world of human beings that you can't you can't change things overnight

yeah it's something I've been struck by in my personal research is how many

revolutionaries who wanted to be were actually really regretted what they did

and the costs that it that had put on people around them now what about the

idea that all of history is really a mass of individual conspiracies oh so

all right so I have I have a really fascinating relationship with conspiracy

theories in general part of sort of indirectly why I'm a libertarian has to

do with conspiracy theories when I was a kid in my mid-teens I was reading kind

of anyone who had a theory a weird wacky theory of the world so so by Bible

prophecy and Erich von Daniken cherry to the gods right I mean I was just

fascinated by all that stuff and then I got fascinated by the Kennedy

assassination and there was a period I came oh how old I was and would before I

can tell you this it was before I was 16 because I can remember clear as day

coming home from school when Reagan was shot right in 1980 and and coming home

and hearing the news and like yelling at my mom who was said so don't tell me you

put the VCR on a tape this we need we need to have visual evidence right right

you know I'm thinking about suddenly I'm Zapruder like no one else has a VCR I

mean it was early in VCR years right but I was but I was that

was so I was in the middle of it right then and so I think all of that stuff it

so happened that the when I began to read sort of libertarian stuff when the

folks first books I read was a book called restoring the American Dream by

Robert Jay ringer which kind of I was working at the library at a time and it

came across the desk and I look at this thing I said oh here's another guy with

a wacky theory right and it turns out it was a good one right and so that got me

interested and it was because of that sort of fascination by all this weird

stuff so so I love conspiracy theories fascinate me and and I think so here's

here's why I think libertarians are attracted to conspiracy theories because

it for some of us for many of us the world

is such a messed up place and it's so obvious to us how messed up it is and

how much better it could be if we only did these other things of course someone

is messing it up on purpose you know some evil actors must be frustrating the

good right I mean if you have any belief in the sort of good of ideas and human

beings why are we so why are things so messed up and I think by the way the ant

the antidote to that is sort of like public choice theory and these sorts of

things would help us understand how we can get in such a bad place

even if people's aren't evil right that institutional structures guide people's

behavior in those ways but so I think at one level right it's some libertarians

are attracted to it because it helped it it sort of helps explain why we haven't

won there's these evil forces and we're not even poor not powerful enough all

right these are still good and we've expressed them well just these guys

they're out they have all these magical on the other hand libertarians should be

the last people to believe in conspiracy theories because at some level it

suggests that there's people have the ability to manipulate social outcomes

according to their intentions I mean I wrote a piece for few years and years

ago called conspiracy theory socialism right which is sort of making this point

that if you really take that version of conspiracy theory why don't you know you

should socialism should work right the difference is you just have the bad guys

with conspiracy theory socialism just a good guy conspiracy theory right if you

really believe that people can manage outcomes and manipulate us like puppets

that way so so I think there's you know I think that's all in there I also think

we're forced as libertarians that confront

she theories because there are people attracted on the fringes who for whom

right and this has become certainly a bigger problem with the alt-right and

all this sort of stuff so so we can't we can't ever avoid it and I find them

endlessly fascinating I also find the sort of you know their their their

resistance to falsifiability to be one of the most intellectually amusing

things to watch right the lanes people will go to say well the evidence you

think undermines it actually shows that it's right you know you can think of the

way people create this epistemic bubble around conspiracy theories I think

that's really important for the returns to understand and think about right and

sort of realize that hey wait a second we don't want to do that around our own

ideas right we want to make sure that we're making claims that are you know in

that broad sense of the term falsifiable that that we're backing with evidence

that we don't just automatically reinterpret every piece of evidence

right and go back to our earlier conversation it's a problem mainstream

economists have is reinterpreting every piece of history to automatically fit

the neoclassical model right and I think we just have to be we have to be able to

step back and look at our own biases that way no I mean on the one hand we

know that and actors designs are never the same as the outcome of a situation

or at least you can't count on right and that's and that's the important insight

from the people sometimes forget about public choice theory right public choice

theory is an unintended consequences story about how bad things happen that

are not the intention of the actors right and that's different cuz people

would say to me well wait isn't public choice just a version of conspiracy no

it's it's not conspiracy theory seems to me to neglect unintended consequences in

a way that public choice doesn't well maybe it's more correct to say public

choice is a story about why conspiracies go wrong that's not that would be

another way to put it right because I mean part of the Austrian credo here is

that individuals act always to satisfy their own interests you know and and to

change their condition to one more satisfactory so and it's in some sense

at least everything is a conspiracy to improve yourself you're you know people

you value their condition or whatever but things definitely don't always work

out that way and the notion you know the other problem is I call it the sort of

the Rodney problem right is is it is it our people

incompetent you know what you can't think people are both incompetent and

brilliant enough to hide their incompetence at the same time right and

so you know conspiracy theories face that too for people who are skeptical of

the of this you know who don't even think that the government can deliver

the mail that it could hide a multiyear you know a generational conspiracy of

powerful people to do what's right you know you can't even deliver the mail but

you somehow you kept all this in secret space / right yeah so so to me that's

another you know another problem here so let's run down then a couple conspiracy

theories that you think are true oh okay so I mean I the the one I mean I'm um

you know it'll take a lot of work to convince me Oswald acted alone I still I

still I can't you know I think I stopped reading that stuff sometime in college

and so I'm gonna you know people are gonna hear this and start sending me

emails saying well you haven't read this book a nice book yeah I haven't all

right but but but sort of the you know the to a young to a fourteen or fifteen

year old right there were all kinds of things that just pushed all the buttons

there right and so even even today you know part of me would I don't I'm not

sure I really believe that he didn't act alone but but it's like a hurdle that

has to be overcome right I'm not sure there's I mean that's the one is sort of

convene if you want to think about second traditional conspiracy theories

that's the one and it's only because I think that I've been so probably so

primed at just the right age to think to think critically about it I should I

suppose since I've written a lot about I should say a word about the Fed here

right because we do there's plenty of people right who want to you know make

that point to that this was some again some kind of conspiracy theory okay but

it's a really nice example of what we were just talking about which is it's

true there was some bad actors and and and who thought that they could get

control of the monetary system and sort of do bad things with it but they

couldn't their intentions didn't play out the way they thought because the

creation of that beast happened through the democratic political process and and

the real problem with the Fed is not that it's the creation of four guys or

six guys at Jekyll Island who dreamed it up but that was a political compromise

right that was this thing that's you know is a decentralized

central bank and all the problems that come with it right so here's an

interesting case where we where we want you know there's some evidence it makes

it look like the conspiracy theory story is true yet when you dig deep enough

into it you realize now it's actually just really just the same old public

choice in the same old public joy story right that about how the ultimate result

doesn't bear out the intentions of those within the political process and

compromise is necessary and you get these weird things that that that you

know that that that don't work very well right and that and and the and did you

know the Fed does real damage but that's not because the Rothschilds are behind

it or or apparently now the Rothschilds controlled the weather as we've learned

hahaha couple weeks nope speaking of that story by the way what do you think

are some of the more important conspiracy theories that we should

whether true or not that we should take seriously because enough people find

importance there sadly all the ones that you might just call the sort of tropes

of anti-semitism I mean I you know for this is personal for me at one level but

I do think it's it's not just personal it and it's been it's getting worse

again over the last really I think decade this sort of you know whether

it's just people thinking it's funny to troll with this stuff I don't think it's

just that I think we really are seeing a return of this belief that that that

that Jews have not just and what's interesting this time not just

manipulated like the world of finance in the ways that historically been the case

but the new one is that Jewish ideas are responsible right that that Jew that

that Marxism is a Jewish thing socialism a Jewish thing though the the you know

sort of the the Frankfurt School is a Jewish thing right Google is immobilized

I'm I'm happy to call myself a globalist in a cosmopolitan be anti-semitic we

should we should we should not let those words go but anyway yeah so I think

these this kind of stuff again a they're there they are conspiracy theories

because the the form that anti-semitism frequently takes

is-is-is this kind of thing right where Jews secretly manipulate in control not

just again the material world but now the world the world of ideas you know I

mean there's the versions other anti-semitic stuff like you know blood

libel and all that which isn't quite conspiracy theory it's nasty in its own

right but but I do think that's that's the one that I'm seeing these days and

and frankly you know that's gonna lay all the blame on the right I think our

friends on the Left have to be careful here too in their stories they tell

about AI you know a pact and and the Jewish lobby and all this kind of stuff

the sort of whole influence of Israel thing verges into conspiracy theory of

time from people who ought to know better right and and and again it's just

more complicated than that and one of the things I tend to say to people who

on the Left who sort of bring that stuff up is have ya have you actually gone to

a temple or synagogue recently and asked the people there what they think of

those issues cuz ask forty people you'll get 50 different opinions right it's not

like there's this sort of you know monolithic Jewish view of Israel and of

the Middle East and that whole conflict it's very--it's and for American Jews

it's really difficult and troubling and this haven't reduced down to this sort

of story about money and AIPAC and whatever is is you know it's not as

nasty as the other stuff but it's in the ballpark

if you've liked what you've heard today from Professor Horowitz then keep a

close watch on libertarianism.org we will very soon be launching our latest

guide series none other than Steve Horowitz on Austrian economics

liberty chronicles is a project of libertarianism.org is produced by test

terrible if you've enjoyed this episode of Liberty Chronicles please rate review

and subscribe to us on iTunes for more information on liberty Chronicles visit

libertarianism.org

For more infomation >> Liberty Chronicles, Ep. 52: The Dismal Science (with Steve Horwitz) - Duration: 36:09.

-------------------------------------------

中國人為何喜歡死記硬背?淵源很深! - Duration: 7:11.

For more infomation >> 中國人為何喜歡死記硬背?淵源很深! - Duration: 7:11.

-------------------------------------------

Adpocalypse 2018 | Why Can't YouTube Fix It? - Duration: 7:55.

I posted an article on my tumblr last week from CNN Tech about how YouTube may

be facing the adpocalypse part 2? 3? Eleventy? because it's still running ads against

extremist videos "ads from over 300 companies and organizations including

tech giants major retailers newspapers and government agencies ran on YouTube

channels promoting white nationalists Nazis pedophilia conspiracy theories and

North Korean propaganda" so how did this happen? again? and why can't youtube stop

it? well let's look at some of the things they've done since last time one of

YouTube's previous responses through the whole adpocalypse mess was to restrict

channels with fewer than 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 hours of watch

time from being able to monetize and also requiring that you keep your watch

time above a certain level to stay monetized to say that this was not a

popular move among small creators would be something of an understatement

but it does at least partially solve the problem of people starting up YouTube

channels immediately monetizing them and then proceeding to post videos about how Hitler

is a really nice person who likes dogs or how Daesh is awesome. one of the

other methods that YouTube has brought in to make sure that all of the videos

it runs ads against are brand safe is its Demonetization algorithm the

algorithm scans videos as they're uploaded to the site for potentially

inappropriate content and may demonetize them on that basis. and YouTube brought

this feature in without really announcing or explaining it but

YouTube's failures of communication are not the topic of this video. Now it's

true that if your video is Demonetized by this algorithm you can appeal it but

it may or may not work the odds that you'll actually get your video seen by a

human are relatively low unless you're already a large channel and if your

video is demonetized it's almost certainly going to be during your first

day or two which is when you'd expect the highest number of views and thus the

highest ad revenue because all of your subscribers are coming to check it out

so for creators not helpful however the advantage of the algorithm is that it

learns so the more we submit appeals the more it can learn whether or not that's

actually unsafe content or inappropriate content or whether it's actually okay

and hopefully that means there will be fewer false positives in future which

may not be good news for you of everything you do is deemed brand

unsafe by YouTube but does at least that the more obvious bad actors are

probably going to get caught. so there is some utility to it but why do you need

an algorithm at all is it just that youtube are unwilling to put in the money

to hand check every dodgy video well I don't know if they're unwilling to spend

money but given the demands of the platform they would be physically unable

to keep up with all of the videos on here because so much content is uploaded

to YouTube every day I looked up some estimates which run from 300 to 500

hours of content being uploaded to YouTube every minute even if only a

fraction of a fraction of those videos were going to cause problems that is a

higher workload than any human moderation team can handle so you need

the algorithm but by the same token you can't rely solely on the algorithm

humanity is a creative species if we perceive an obstacle we are ingenious at

figuring out ways around it and people are willing to put in a whole lot of

work to do so I mean those Nigerian prince scams don't write themselves now

do they? so say you want to start a channel which you know that YouTube

would immediately want to crack down on you know neo-nazis

pedophilia North Korean propaganda I mean you could just put up your videos

which are obviously about neo-nazis or Daesh or whatever and you could tag them

with neo-nazi or Daesh or whatever but YouTube reads your title and your

description and your tags it looks at your thumbnail for inappropriate content

like gore or weapons and it listens to your audio so it can generate automatic

captions what I'm saying is if your video is obviously about a topic that

YouTube has deemed unsafe or inappropriate it's not gonna happen

they might not ban you and delete your account but they won't monetize you but

if you had time and you were willing to play the long game and as we have seen

from the Russian tumblr bots thing governments are, then you can make a lot

of videos most of which are fairly innocuous and then when you want to

sneak your not so innocuous videos past YouTube you have this whole backlog

of appropriate content plus you can scrupulously avoid using any of the

words which might ping the algorithm in the video itself. There was a good

example of this from Facebook actually. there was a group on Facebook called

Britain first which got banned after coming to global attention having been

shared by Donald Trump the reason that Facebook ban

is for inciting hatred by posting videos like "Muslim migrant (who wasn't actually

a Muslim migrant at all) beats up Dutch boy on crutches!" at the time that they

were banned though Britain first had more than 2 million likes on Facebook

how does a page which posts videos comparing Muslims to animals get more

than 2 million likes well because Facebook doesn't show you

everything a page does right and while Britain first posted the occasional

video which should have gotten them an insta ban mostly they posted really

innocuous stuff we love this british sports star like if you do too! share if

you love your military family! give this post a thumbs up if you're proud of our

veterans! look at this cute picture of a dog! okay I'm not sure about that last

one but and then every so often they'd put up something like Muslim migrant who

isn't actually a Muslim migrant beats up Dutch boy on crutches but Facebook being

Facebook only shows a fraction of the people who follow a page each post that

the page puts up it would be entirely possible to be a follower of Britain

first for years particularly if you don't use Facebook all that often and to

have seen nothing from them but cute pictures of dogs and poppy wreaths

Facebook knows what you like remember

so to bring this back to youtube they can crack down but it's really hard. when

something comes to mass media attention obviously they'll remove it but there

are thousands and thousands of channels which are basically akin to the Britain

first Facebook page and they're not being taken down because they're just not

getting flagged that often keeping bad actors off your platform when you're the

size of YouTube is not hard it's pretty much impossible but you can cut down on

the numbers of bad actors. and so you have the algorithms because you can't

possibly manage the quantity of content on YouTube without them and on top of

that you have your moderation team because people are smart and will figure

out ways around your algorithm.s but the moderation team needs someone to tell

them about the bad actors they need people to report the animal abuse and

the pornography and the beheadings unfortunately that's a difficult thing

to incentivize well because what you actually want is for good people with

good intentions to flag videos which are actually inappropriate while

discouraging bad people with bad intentions from flagging things because

they don't like it YouTube Heroes which you might remember as one of YouTube's

2016 controversies was supposed to be YouTube's way of getting the people who

use the site to provide them with free labor ie we will gamify the system by

giving you points for doing this grunt work and as you get higher up the ranks

we will give you things like a small amount of power over others mwahaha

which was possibly not the best idea in the world given that it actively

incentivized flagging videos I mean if YouTube agrees with your flag and takes

a video down you get a point but if YouTube disagrees then nothing happens

so why not try it? so this is the problem why can't youtube just find all of the

bad actor channels and delete them? because people are smart even bad people

and so it's basically an arms race. but what do you think? how do you reckon that

YouTube should solve its problems? the ad problem or the terrorist content problem

or any of its many other problems leave a comment let me know and I'll see you

next time!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét