Speak music lover, how are you?
Today we are going to address the issue of mental health in society reflecting on the work of Raul
Seixas, Foucault and Machado de Assis.
For "normal" people, Raul Seixas, hippies and people of counter culture are crazy,
Zé drugs, sick, vagabonds.
Starting from this premise, let's take a look about how Raul criticizes the normal; as Foucault
criticizes the treatment of madness; and how Machado de Assis criticizes
between madness and lucidity in the Alienist tale.
Are you confused?
Calm down, after the vignette I explain this better. idea
[Vignette] [To be common is easy, Difficult is to be different!]
[Colab vignette]
While you strives to be
A normal guy And make everything the same
As you work, you work 12 hours a day. day for a boss, to have money and a lot
Sometimes survive a lifetime hanged in debts and appearances for society,
tries to be the "normal citizen" who faces hours in transportation, after hours
as an employee, to earn misery and still feel guilty
I by my side, learning to be crazy
A total madman In real madness
Modern psychology has realized that one of the factors which contributes to the occurrence of depression,
stresses and madness itself is linked the sameness, routine.
That guy who does the same things all the days, without any kind of novelty, a robot
system is much more likely to develop depression and anxiety.
In this verse Raul is probably expressing your way to finding an alternative
to the obvious.
This difference between what it is to be crazy and what is normal is a lot of conflict
of the Alienist's narrative where it is asked to the reader who really is the crazy story?
The people or Dr Bacamarte who thought lucid, and then goes alone with the
conclusion to be the only crazy?
For Foucault, what it's like to be crazy depends of each society.
Being crazy means not being normal, but each historical context has its own
ideals of normality; therefore, what is madness for a time can be considered
normal for another.
When Raul criticizes the person who struggles to be normal, he is criticizing the concept
normality of the society in which he lives.
I believe that Raul Seixas meant in this verse that he did not want to be the same people
normal, he wanted to be different, to answer the normal way.
He literally wanted answers, which the subject did not look for more - that's why he is
"Learning to be crazy".
Controlling the my crazy
Mixed with my lucidity
I believe that this control is a figure of language that despite being labeled crazy
he has lucidity in his thoughts, in the version live he speaks disguising in my lucidity
which makes the verse more meaningful, Foucault book history of madness makes a study since
the rebirth to modernity of the treatment of madmen.
Foucault criticizes the way that twentieth century treated the madness: the people who
did not conform to social norms were isolated from social life in nursing homes and asylums.
Raul, here, proposes just the opposite: Mix maluquez with lucidity, accept
differences that the escape from normality can to bring about without losing a sense of
to be lucid, to have the "foot on the floor".
This brings a reflection not only on the issue metaphor of poetry that Raul Seixas composed
next to the friend Claudio Roberto: we also see the extremely pertinent question that Foucault
points to A cyclic vision movement of "social cleansing" and excluding
more than turning away from the eyes that disturbs, disturbs or is in any way
incomprehensible.
More or less the same thing we see in users of drugs from Cracolândia that Doria expelled
the basis of demolition and homeless people to on the day of greatest cold recorded
in the city of São Paulo, that is, it does not solve The problem, just try to hide from the eyes.
of society.
I will stay To be sure
Crazy beauty And I'm going to stay
To be sure Crazy beauty
I believe that Raul wants to show in that refrain that he will certainly be different,
not following a standard imposed by society, and by doing so he is considered crazy.
But he accepts the label and exploits things good that this escape from normality brings,
so he's not just crazy, but crazy beauty.
And this path that I chose it myself
It's so easy to follow Having nowhere to go
The society in which Raul lived had correct way of living (studying, working,
marry, have children, retire and die).
To escape this unique model, Raul spoke to live one day at a time as if it were
the last, learn something new every day, or either, get out of the rut, be "light".
It suggests music to me, that people normal people strive to be the perfect standard
that society expects, but in fact, live of appearances, already the crazy, the crazy, for
lack of censorship is what really lives good.
Before continuing I want to invite you like it the channel to help him not
I invite you to take a look at the campaign's support, which starts at only 2 reais per month, you
help and even win incredible prizes!
I will stay I'll keep
all the certainty Crazy crazy
Beauty, Beauty
Machado taught us that no one is perfectly lucid.
Also taught to question classifications of who is crazy and who is normal.
Foucault helps us, even today, to understand that these classifications are not things
fixed, change from time to time.
The standard of normality of the whole society have defects, and it is precisely those who flee
that can best help us remedy these defects.
By alienating these people into asylums, they we are only condemning the person not to
to belong to society as well as to we are depriving society of the people who
has a different perception and that precisely so they can help society in a way
only.
And Raul reminded us that we can little of our madness, that is, of what we
society does not accept - and maybe even that, to be happier.
I hope you enjoyed it, if you liked it click on like, this project was made in
partnership with Canal Antidote, Mimimidias, channel review and podcast story box
I made a playlist with everyone.
Many thanks for your hearing, bye.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét