hi my people
so i've been doing a lot of serious videos lately
thank you for all the really nice comments
however
i've realized something
i need to do a really stupid video
-------------------------------------------
¿ REALMENTE SE CONTIENE GOKU EN TODOS LOS COMBATES ? Explicación Definitiva - Duration: 18:43.
For more infomation >> ¿ REALMENTE SE CONTIENE GOKU EN TODOS LOS COMBATES ? Explicación Definitiva - Duration: 18:43. -------------------------------------------
Harvard Poll Shows USA is Woke Majority Say Mainstream Media Pub - Duration: 6:27.
Harvard Poll Shows USA is Woke: Majority Say Mainstream Media Publishes Fake News
�Fake News� has become the buzzword that the dying mainstream media has been using
to dismiss alternative viewpoints that may appear on the internet or in alternative media.
While it is true that there are a large number of satire sites and clear disinformation sites
on the web, mainstream media sources are focusing on alternative media websites who do not share
their views politically and attempting to associate these sites with the �fake news�
phenomenon.
Luckily, however, it seems that the public is not buying this recent propaganda campaign.
A poll conducted by the Harvard-Harris group found that 65 percent of voters believe that
the mainstream media is guilty of distributing false reports.
Harvard-Harris co-director Mark Penn believes that the extreme polarization on cable news
channels is playing a major role in this negative perception that has been developing.
�Much of the media is now just another part of the partisan divide in the country with
Republicans not trusting the �mainstream� media and Democrats seeing them as reflecting
their beliefs.
Every major institution from the presidency to the courts is now seen as operating in
a partisan fashion in one direction or the other,� Penn told The Hill.
The poll reportedly surveyed 2,006 registered voters from May 17 to May 20.
Although the mainstream media continuously pumps divide into the populace through the
use of the left/right paradigm, the survey shows this is simply not what the people want.
One of the questions asked is if people want to see the divide continue � the overwhelming
response was, �no.�
Trust in the mainstream media has been slowly declining after several decades of monopolization
and centralization.
Over the last century, many large companies have been attempting to consolidate the media
and have total control over what is said in the public arena.
These companies are almost always heavily involved in politics and international business
affairs, many times even depending on the government to regulate their competition.
The good news is, people aren�t buying it.
Despite the massive push by the media to assert some sort of connection between Russia and
Trump � without providing a single shred of concrete evidence � the majority of Americans
still don�t buy it.
While Donald Trump is most likely someone�s puppet, Putin is most assuredly not the master.
Through controlling the dialogue in the media they are able to portray their political allies
in a positive light, even if this is accomplished by telling blatant lies.
It is even a generally accepted fact that all of the corporate news outlets have their
own political agendas.
What is not realized is that even though they may have different party affiliations, the
major media sources are all on the same team and advertise the same general worldview.
This bias was clearly visible after Trump bombed Syria in April.
As the Free Thought Project pointed out, the day following Trump�s illegal act of war
against a sovereign nation was nothing but praise for him in the mainstream media � including
outlets like WaPo and the NY Times, who constantly attacked him prior to the strike.
In the early 1980s, there were over 50 corporations which controlled all of the news media in
America.
This is a small number considering that it accounted for television, movies, magazines,
books and music all combined.
Before the First World War, there were actually hundreds of corporations that made up the
US media.
This corporate monopolization is largely due to government regulation that prevents independent
journalists from reaching the masses.
This is done by limiting the number of broadcast spots available, issuing permits and licenses
for the ability to broadcast and, now, censoring alternative media.
In 1983 a man by the name of Ben Bagdikian published a book called �The Media Monopoly�
which pointed out the consolidation going on in the media at the time.
In his book, Bagdikian predicted that the meager number of 50 corporations would dwindle
very quickly to less than a dozen companies in coming decades.
His predictions were met with a great deal of criticism in the mainstream circuit, and
that was to be expected considering they were the target of his accusations.
Sure enough though, over the next 25 years, the media would be consolidated into fewer
and fewer hands.
In 2012 it was reported by Forbes that just 6 companies owned the entire mainstream media,
then they reported in 2016 that all media was owned by just 15 billionaires amongst
those companies.
-------------------------------------------
That Marilyn Monroe UFO Document – Again - Duration: 18:37.
That Marilyn Monroe UFO Document � Again
BY Nick Redfern
I was interested to see Paul Seaburn�s new article, �New Film Suggests Marilyn Monroe
Was About To Reveal Aliens.� It�s a saga that dates back to the mid-1990s and which
is clearly not going to go away anytime soon, as this latest development shows. The vast
majority of the story is reliant on a controversial document of questionable origins and of equally
questionable authenticity. Allegedly, it�s a CIA document dated August 3, 1962 and which
deals with Marilyn Monroe�s supposed knowledge of Roswell and UFO-themed conspiracies. You
can find the document here. What particularly interests me about the �Monroe
document� is not so much what it says, but what it specifically doesn�t say. Despite
what many researchers have said, there is not even a single reference in the document
to aliens, extraterrestrials, flying saucers, or UFOs. Not a single one. In fact, the wording
could actually push the whole thing down a very different path. I�ll explain what I
mean by that. But, first, let�s see how and under what circumstances the controversial
one-page document surfaced. It all began in 1995, at a Los Angeles-based
press conference. It was a press conference held by a man named Milo Speriglio. He was
a guy with a deep interest in the circumstances surrounding Marilyn�s death. Speriglio was
so interested in her final day that he wrote three books on the issues of her life and
still-controversial death. They were Crypt 33, The Marilyn Conspiracy, and Marilyn Monroe:
Murder Cover-Up. Until 1995, Speriglio had not made any kind of connection between the
Hollywood uber-babe and UFOs. So, what was it that prompted Speriglio to head off into
new and highly inflammatory territory? It was a revelation from a man named Timothy
Cooper. Today, many people within Ufology might not
recognize that name. But, from the early-to-late 1990s, Cooper � of Big Bear Lake, California
� was a well-known figure in Ufology. He was also a controversial figure, too. Most
of the controversy stemmed from the fact that Cooper claimed to have received a wealth of
old, sensational, leaked documents from retired figures in the intelligence community � almost
all of them on crashed UFOs, Roswell, dead aliens, and the notorious Majestic 12 group.
There�s no doubt that the documents existed (and still exist). You can find PDF versions
of most of them at Ryan Wood�s MajesticDocuments.com website. There are literally hundreds of pages.
The big question is: are they the real deal? When the papers were made available, there
were those researchers who believed that the documents were 100 percent real. Some considered
them to be government disinformation. And others were firmly of the opinion that Cooper
had created them himself. The controversy raged for a while, but finally imploded upon
itself with barely a sigh. The Marilyn document was one of those which Cooper claimed to have
received from one of his various sources, or as I call them �ufological Snowdens.�
I know quite a bit about the Cooper papers (including the Marilyn Monroe document), as
the following extract from my new book, The Roswell UFO Conspiracy, makes clear (QUOTE):
�It�s a little known fact that in late 2001 Tim Cooper sold all of his voluminous
UFO files to Dr. Robert M. Wood. Bob is the author of Alien Viruses and the father of
Ryan Wood, who has spent years researching alleged crashed UFO incidents � all detailed
in his book, Majic Eyes Only. It is even less well-known that in the early days of 2002,
Bob hired me to spend a week in an Orange County, California-based motel-room, surrounded
by all of the thousands upon thousands of pages of Cooper�s voluminous collection
of the cosmic sort. The plan was for me to catalog all of the material, to compile each
and every piece of it into chronological order, and to summarize the content of each document,
every letter, and every Freedom of Information request that Cooper had submitted to government
agencies � which is precisely what I did. It was a week in which I most definitely earned
my loot. It was also a week that paralleled the infamous story told by Hunter S. Thompson
in his classic gonzo saga, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Whereas Thompson was hunkered
down with his whisky, margaritas and shrimp cocktails, for me it was cases of cold beer
and club sandwiches�.
Contained within that huge amount of material at my disposal was the Monroe document � the
original one that Cooper is said to have received from one of his sources. There were also a
number of FOIA requests from Cooper that he had sent to various military and intelligence
agencies, in search of any and all files on Marilyn Monroe. Cooper was clearly seeking
out as much as he could find on Marilyn and UFOs � regardless of the actual origin of
the document. For around eight weeks, Speriglio did absolutely nothing with the document,
aside from sitting on it and pondering on what his next move should be. What Speriglio
finally did was to hold that aforementioned press-conference. And that�s how the story
began and how the document and its contents spilled over into the UFO research community.
One of the lesser known aspects of this story is that Speriglio made a very brief comment
to the effect that copies of the document were in the hands of what he described as
�two federal agencies.� At the press conference, Speriglio flatly refused to reveal the identities
of the two agencies. And he refused to reveal the names when questioned later, too. So far,
nothing of any substance has ever surfaced in relation to what, exactly, those two agencies
may have done with the document. If anything, at all, of course.
Now, let�s take a look at the contents of the document. Most of those contents are focused
on conversations between two people: Dorothy Kilgallen and a friend named Howard Rothberg.
The former was a well-known figure in the field of celebrity-journalism in the 1950s
and who was deeply interested in the JFK assassination (see this link for more information). As an
aside, when the Speriglio-Cooper document surfaced, I fired off FOIA requests to the
CIA and FBI and received copies of their files on Kilgallen. The CIA papers were few and
brief, to say the least. The FBI, however, mailed me close to 170 pages on Kilgallen,
demonstrating that she was someone watched closely by J. Edgar Hoover�s Special-Agents.
As for what the purported CIA document states, there is this: �Rothberg discussed the apparent
comeback of [Marilyn Monroe] with Kilgallen and the break up with the Kennedys. Rothberg
told Kilgallen that she was attending Hollywood parties hosted by the �inner circle� among
Hollywood�s elite and was becoming the talk of the town again. Rothberg indicated in so
many words, that she had secrets to tell, no doubt arising from her trists [sic] with
the President and the Attorney General.� Now, we get to the crux of the story. The
document states: �One such [illegible] mentions the visit by the President at a secret air
base for the purpose of inspecting things from outer space. Kilgallen replied that she
knew what might be the source of the visit. In the mid-fifties Kilgallen learned of secret
effort by US and UK governments to identify the origins of crashed spacecraft and dead
bodies, from a British government official. Kilgallen believed the story may have come
from the [illegible] in the late forties. Kilgallen said that if the story is true,
it could cause terrible embarrassment to Jack and his plans to have NASA put men on the
moon.� It is true that Dorothy Kilgallen wrote � briefly
� about UFOs back in 1955. While vacationing in the U.K. in that year, Kilgallen was on
the receiving end of a very odd story, as she noted: �I can report today on a story
which is positively spooky, not to mention chilling. British scientists and airmen, after
examining the wreckage of one mysterious flying ship, are convinced these strange aerial objects
are not optical illusions or Soviet inventions, but are flying saucers which originate on
another planet. The source of my information is a British official of cabinet rank who
prefers to remain unidentified.�
That same �British official of cabinet rank� reportedly advised Kilgallen of the following:
�We believe, on the basis of our inquiry thus far, that the saucers were staffed by
small men � probably under four feet tall. It�s frightening, but there�s no denying
the flying saucers come from another planet.� Kilgallen had more to say: �This official
quoted scientists as saying a flying ship of this type could not have possibly been
constructed on Earth. The British Government, I learned, is withholding an official report
on the �flying saucer� examination at this time, possibly because it does not wish
to frighten the public. When my husband and I arrived here from a brief vacation, I had
no premonition that I would be catapulting myself into the controversy over whether flying
saucers are real or imaginary.� The references in the document to Marilyn
having �secrets to tell� (secrets supposedly shared with her by JFK and RFK) have led a
number of UFO investigators to conclude that Marilyn was killed because of what she knew
about Roswell. The alleged CIA document goes on to refer to Monroe�s �diary of secrets,�
�what the newspapers would do with such disclosures,� and how she had �threatened
to hold a press conference and would tell all.� A countdown to death, all in the name
of maintaining UFO secrecy? Well, yes, that�s how it seems. But, in Ufology practically
nothing is as it seems. It�s important to note that at the top of
the document there is a reference to a Project Moon Dust. In a January 2017 article I wrote
for Mysterious Universe on Moon Dust I stated: �Over the years, ufologists have given a
great deal of attention to a certain U.S. military program called Project Moon Dust
(also referred to as Moondust). Its origins date back to the 1950s. The reason why so
much attention has been placed upon Project Moon Dust is because of its potential connection
to the issue of alleged crashed and recovered UFOs held by elements of the U.S. military
� crash-retrievals or C/Rs as they are generally known. But, was Moon Dust really the key operation
in secretly locating and recovering crashed ships from faraway worlds?�
No, it was not. A November 3, 1961 U.S. Air Force document states: ��In addition to
their staff duty assignments, intelligence team personnel have peacetime duty functions
in support of such Air Force projects as Moondust, Bluefly, and UFO, and other AFCIN directed
quick reaction projects which require intelligence team operational capabilities�Unidentified
Flying Objects (UFO): Headquarters USAF has established a program for investigation of
reliably reported unidentified flying objects within the United States. AFR 200-2 delineates
1127th collection responsibilities�� That all sounds very interesting�but�if
you take a careful look at all of the Moon Dust documents in the public domain (which
I have done), it becomes very clear that when the military was referring to �UFOs� in
their files they were not talking about alien spacecraft. Rather, they were referencing
probable space debris that originated with the former Soviet Union. Which brings me back
to the document that got Milo Speriglio fired up.
Keep Moon Dust in mind as you read the following. You�ll recall that earlier in this article
I stated the following: �Despite what many researchers have said, there is not even a
single reference in the document to dead aliens, extraterrestrials, flying saucers, or UFOs.
Not a single one.� That�s absolutely true. What it really says is that JFK allegedly
traveled to ��a secret air base for the purpose of inspecting things from outer space.�
No references to aliens or to extraterrestrial ships. The document also refers to �crashed
spacecraft and dead bodies.� But, again, no specific references to mangled E.T.s or
wrecked saucers.
Now, some might say that references to �dead bodies,� to �things from outer space,�
and to �crashed spacecraft� are references to Roswell and deceased aliens. On the other
hand, however, the very fact that the document references Project Moon Dust suggests another
possibility. Namely, that the subject-matter may have been a failed � and still unknown
� early Soviet manned-mission into space. One which predated Yuri Gagarin�s flight
into outer space on April 12, 1961. There is another bit of data that supports this
scenario. Recall that the document states: �Kilgallen said that if the story is true,
it could cause terrible embarrassment to Jack and his plans to have NASA put men on the
moon.� For ufologists this is � or should be � a problem.
Why on Earth would widespread knowledge of the existence of aliens �cause terrible
embarrassment to Jack and his plans to have NASA put me on the moon?� The answer is:
it wouldn�t. If such information on aliens reached the public it certainly would have
caused widespread fear, wonder and amazement among the public � and within government,
too. But, specifically provoking embarrassment in relation to plans to put a man on the Moon?
That doesn�t make any sense. If, however, those �dead bodies� were Soviet cosmonauts,
if the �crashed spacecraft� was a Russian rocket, and if the Soviets did have a number
of unsuccessful manned-missions that predated Gagarin � and that such information threatened
to surface during the time Kennedy was in office � then yes that would have caused
significant embarrassment for the JFK administration � and, possibly, for NASA.
So, where does all of this leave us? Admittedly, since the Marilyn document first surfaced
in 1995, my views and opinions have gone back and forth. I think it�s probably a hoax.
Probably. Mainly because it gives Ufology just about all the things it wants and yearns
for: the references to �dead bodies� and �crashed spacecraft� inevitably provoke
Roswell-like imagery. The mention of a �secret air base� effortlessly points us in the
direction of Area 51, thus adding another layer of sensational conspiracy to the story.
The JFK-UFO angle reinforces the belief in some quarters that Kennedy was whacked because
of what he knew about Roswell. The same with Marilyn, too. It�s The X-Files-meets-Dark
Skies-meets-Oliver Stone�s JFK. But, I have to admit, I do find it intriguing
that whoever really wrote the document, they were extremely vague in terms of what they
were talking about. I have seen more than a few questionable UFO documents in my time,
and the one thing that nearly all of them share is an explicit, collective reference
to ETs, aliens, flying saucers, and extraterrestrial craft. In other words, there is no doubt about
the subject-matter: creatures from other worlds. For me, though, the Marilyn document remains
interesting because of the undeniable haziness of what it says. Or of what it doesn�t say.
It doesn�t tell the reader that aliens crashed anywhere � despite the assumptions of Ufology.
So, maybe, with that in mind, there is something to the document, after all. That�s not a
case of me fence-sitting. As I said, I think it�s a hoax. But, if it is, then a great
deal of thought went into it. As did a great deal of restraint � in terms of the unclear
subject-matter. Maybe, there�s another answer: that we�re seeing a document crafted by
disinformation experts to confuse Ufology, and for reasons presently unknown.
In light of all the above, it�s not surprising the document is still �alive and kicking,�
close to a quarter of a century after it surfaced.
-------------------------------------------
Gaming PC Build for Under $1400! - Duration: 6:43.
For more infomation >> Gaming PC Build for Under $1400! - Duration: 6:43. -------------------------------------------
mis ataques son para defender - Duration: 1:38.
For more infomation >> mis ataques son para defender - Duration: 1:38. -------------------------------------------
See for breakfast in Europe of all nationalities - Duration: 3:56.
For more infomation >> See for breakfast in Europe of all nationalities - Duration: 3:56. -------------------------------------------
GLOBAL DRUG SURVEY MAGIC MUSHROOMS SAFEST - health - Duration: 4:28.
GLOBAL DRUG SURVEY: MAGIC MUSHROOMS SAFEST RECREATIONAL DRUG
Among all recreational substances, mushrooms appear to be the safest, a new survey released
Wednesday said.
The annual Global Drug Survey, conducted in 50 countries and involving around 120,000
participants, found that only 0.2 percent of nearly 10,000 people who reported taking
hallucinogenic mushrooms in 2016 needed emergency medical treatment.
Rates of emergency treatment for substances such as LSD, MDMA, alcohol and cocaine were
almost five times higher.
�Magic mushrooms,� as they are commonly called, can be one of several different types
of fungus.
Over 100 different species of mushroom contain psilocybin, psilocin and baeocystin, the compounds
responsible for the fungi�s hallucinogenic effects.
�Magic mushrooms are one of the safest drugs in the world,� Adam Winstock, a consultant
addiction psychiatrist and founder of the Global Drug Survey, told the Guardian.
Winstock said the bigger risk came from people eating the wrong kind of mushroom.
�Death from toxicity is almost unheard of with poisoning with more dangerous fungi being
a much greater risk in terms of serious harms,� Winstock said.
People in Colombia, New Zealand, Mexico and Norway are the most likely to pick natural
psychedelic mushrooms themselves, the survey found.
Twenty-eight thousand people overall said they had used mind-altering mushrooms at some
point in their lives, with nearly 82 percent seeking a �moderate psychedelic experience�
and the �enhancement of environment and social interactions.�
The survey found that for LSD, another hallucinogen, 1 percent of 10,000 people needed medical
treatment after use of the substance, five times higher than mushrooms users.
�LSD is such a potent drug,� Winstock said.
�It�s so difficult to dose accurately when tabs you buy vary so widely.
It�s easy to take too much and have an experience beyond the one you were expecting.�
But psychedelics such as mushrooms and LSD in general tend to be safer substances compared
to street drugs like heroin and cocaine.
�There is no known lethal dose for LSD or pure psilocybin,� said Brad Burge, a researcher
from the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS).
�People don�t tend to abuse psychedelics, they don�t get dependent, they don�t rot
every organ from head to toe, and many would cite their impact upon their life as profound
and positive,� Winstock said.
�But you need to know how to use them.� Winstock was quick to note that psilocybin
mushrooms aren�t entirely harmless, however.
�Combined use with alcohol and use within risky or unfamiliar settings increase the
risks of harm most commonly accidental injury, panic and short lived confusion, disorientation
and fears of losing one�s mind,� Winstock said.
To avoid a negative experience, Winstock suggested people plain their �trip carefully with
trusted company in a safe place and always know what mushrooms you are using.�
According to other research carried out by Roland Griffiths and Robert Jesse at Johns
Hopkins Medicine, even bad trips can have some positive outcomes.
The researchers surveyed around 2,000 people for a 2016 paper and found that 84 percent
of participants said they benefited from a bad trip.
Beyond recreational use, psilocybin mushrooms have been found to have positive results for
treating anxiety and severe depression.
According to the survey, synthetic cannabis ranks among the most dangerous drugs, with
one in 30 users seeking medical treatment, the highest of any drug studied with the exception
of crystal meth.
The Global Drug Survey is the world�s largest annual survey on drugs
and drug use.
-------------------------------------------
20170521-Doubts-youtube - Duration: 1:12.
This is important for me personally because sometimes
you know we get this impression that
Biblical hope is about having no doubts whatsoever sometimes that's how we "sell" it
and what you see here Rack, Shack, and Benny's declaration
reminds us Biblical hope isn't about not having doubts
Biblical hope is about putting our doubts in the Lord's hands
You can have doubts You're going to have doubts
But it's about putting them in the Lord's hands
The outcome was not certain for Rack, Shack, and Benny
It's easy to read the story knowing what happens They, in that moment, when they said those words
did not know -- they believed
but they did not know The outcome is not certain
it never is from our vantage point The Scriptures say we walk by faith, not by sight
There is nothing wrong with having doubts,
my friends Please hear that this morning
we all have doubts Me too
It's what you do with your doubts that counts If you let them overshadow your life
If you let your doubts define for your life rather than face them
and honestly bring them before the Lord That's when your doubts can get in the way
of you breaking through to where Jesus seeks to take you
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét