WARNING: This documentary contains graphic content that may be disturbing to some viewers. Viewer discretion is advised.
  In neuroscience and psychology, the concepts  of love and fear are more than just emotions.
  They relate to how the deepest unconscious  regions of our brain operate.
  How the reptilian brain only craves what it  lacks and is unaware of what it takes for granted.
  And how what we believe we lack ends up defining  what we love.
  And by gaining insight into the realms of  our unconscious mind and the reality that
  it emerges from, we are presented with a choice.
  "The most important decision that we make,
  is whether we believe we live in a friendly  or a hostile universe."
  While this quote from Albert Einstein sounds  relatable, one can wonder why a man of his
  profound intelligence would specifically claim  this is the most important decision we make.
  This documentary answers that question.
  Tens of thousands of papers are published  each year in the field of neuroscience alone.
  Our knowledge and understanding of the inner  workings of our mind
  and of our universe is  expanding at an astounding rate.
  If you seek rational answers to fundamental  questions about consciousness,
  this documentary  could change your life.
  The human brain is by far the most sophisticated  phenomenon
  that we have been able to observe  to date in our universe.
  And after decades of neuroscience, we still  have endless questions about this mysterious
  structure that holds as many neurons as there  may be stars in our galaxy.
  Yet we do not have to veer far into hypotheticals  or resort to superstition
  to answer some of  our deepest existential questions.
  One of the most baffling observations has  been that some experiments seem to reveal
  two distinct personalities or streams of consciousness  present in our brain,
  one in each hemisphere.
  And only one of these two can talk.
  Under the right conditions, neurologists have  even been able to ask questions to each hemisphere separately.
  Resulting in cases where a person would say  he is not religious when asked in conversation.
  While when this person sees the question in  writing, the mute hemisphere responds by writing
  down its own answer.
  In some cases disagreeing  with the other hemisphere.
  Many more experiments that reveal similar  results indicate that this is more
  than a random oddity or hallucination,
  but instead  some legitimate form of split
  or double consciousness  taking place in our brain.
  Fortunately, this strange disagreement between  both hemispheres
  only occurs when the connection  between them is broken.
  As long as they are connected
  they try to  cooperate and create the perception
  that we  are a singular individual.
  So where exactly are we located inside the  brain?
  If science can pinpoint those parts of the  brain that are largely responsible for language,
  mathematics, specific primal emotions and  so forth, what does it say about the parts
  of the brain that make up the core of what  we are?
  Not only have scientists, despite their best  efforts,
  not been able to locate such a region in the brain.
  But all evidence even points towards this  core not existing.
  It has become more and more clear that in  this miniature universe of the brain,
  roughly a 100 billion neurons all act by themselves
  and communicate with each other as if the brain is an astonishingly complex vehicle
  without a driver.
  A computer without a CPU.
  In our quest for finding some sort of core  of what we are, we could look even deeper
  and zoom in on the basic building blocks of  what our brain is made of.
  But if we peer into the individual molecules  that make up our neurons,
  our findings become  even more counter-intuitive.
  Not only will we not find any mysterious trace  of a soul,
  we will also not bump into any kind of marble-like structures
  that high school  physics taught us are the tiny particles that  everything else is made of.
  You might have heard that roughly 99.9% of  all solid matter is nothing but empty space.
  This is true.
  But zooming into the .1% that should consist  of the stuff everything is made of
  only results in showing us a different kind of emptiness.
  The electrons, the quarks, all the fundamental  particles are not solid objects.
  Thinking of them as somehow tiny spheres is  a convenient simplification,
  but this does not represent the fascinating reality of this  strange quantum void.
  The only things that exist here are waves.
  Waves that behave similar to vibrations of  sound or ripples in water.
  But rather than oscillations of matter, the  peaks and valleys of these quantum waves
  are not made of anything tangible,
  they are waves  of probabilities.
  Their peaks reveal the areas where there is  a high probability of detecting the energy
  of what we may call an electron.
  Their valleys indicate that the chances there  are much lower.
  As bizarre as it may sound that all the building  blocks of our universe seem to behave according
  to chance rather than being intuitively predictable,  this is not just a theory.
  It is a simple fact that can be tested and  observed with nothing more than a laser pointer
  and a comb to replicate part of the famous  double-slit experiment.
  The counter-intuitiveness of this discovery  has been the root of popular misinterpretations
  and metaphysical confusion
  where it's been  described as particles being aware and knowing
  that they're being observed
  or the universe  being influenced by the power of our thinking.
  The truth is at least equally fascinating.
  The real principle at work is that if we can  not know where a particle is, it exists only
  as a probability wave that tells us where  the particle is more or less likely to be found.
  And only when we take action to measure where  the particle could be, the wave will suddenly
  cease to exist and the particle reveals itself.
  The particle has no defined location until  we make the measurement.
  This is why we say that light, for example,  is both a wave and a particle.
  But this quantum weirdness does not just apply  to light,
  it applies to all the particles that everything is made of.
  It also applies to molecules.
  If we fire super-tiny rocks instead of photons,
  they will behave like waves when we're not measuring  them.
  We intuitively believe our universe consists  of solid stuff.
  But in reality, all of it, from the neurons  in our brain to the galaxy we are a part of,
  is the result of probability waves and particles  that pop in and out of existence.
  All this weirdness led Einstein to famously  say:
  "Do you really believe the moon is not  there when you are not looking at it?".
  But no matter how weird it is, quantum theory  and all experimental evidence reveals that
  our universe is inherently probabilistic
  and things within it can not be predicted with 100% certainty.
  This doesn't mean that science cannot make  accurate estimates as to what is more or less likely.
  The mathematics and statistics of quantum  physics reveal that the seemingly random oscillations
  that make up our reality are still profoundly  consistent patterns.
  Many of our modern technologies, such as solar  panels or microprocessors,
  would not have been possible if we had not deciphered
  much of the intricate and unique behavior of quantum mechanics.
  But if no specific region of the brain, nor  the neurons, nor the building blocks
  that our neurons consist of can account for the  phenomenon of our consciousness,
  what is the current scientific assessment as to what brings it about?
  Over the years, there have been many theories,  some of which have since been debunked with
  modern understandings of neuroscience, others  are considered too far-fetched and exotic
  to be of merit without hard evidence.
  But there is one general school of thought  that most scientists consider to be likely.
  An idea that is not only logically sound and  fits our observations,
  but that can transform how we think about life.
  Even though its implications  are thus far rarely discussed and explored.
  In fact, this documentary marks the first  time all these logical conclusions are brought
  together to bring into focus what science  can really tell us
  about some of our deepest existential questions.
  If we look at evolution, it's not so hard  to roughly imagine how life started here on earth.
  4 billion years ago, a unique series of coincidental  probabilities occurred that led to the existence
  of very simple biological cells that could  replicate.
  These were the first forms of life.
  And as they replicated, subtle differences  between the old cells and the new cells would crop up,
  mutations would take place.
  We see it in the genetics of offspring with  every lifeform known to us
  and we can trace it back in the remains and fossils not just of animals and plants,
  but sometimes even of bacteria of as far as 3.5 billion years ago.
  Microscopic crystals and fossils provide us a glimpse
  of life on earth before the first  plants or even algae emerged.
  Over billions of years of replicating and  mutating, these biological mechanisms found
  more and more sophisticated ways of growing  and spreading.
  The tiniest initial differences such as offspring  with a coincidental protein molecule
  that is sensitive to sunlight would end up with  eventually
  more beneficial mutations over many generations.
  4 billion years is a very long time.
  Enough for extremely sophisticated results  such as the human eye to emerge from origins
  as simplistic as a single light-sensitive  protein molecule.
  As a result, even our most advanced technologies  are often still no match for some of the mechanisms
  that have taken evolution aeons to engineer.
  But when we begin to contemplate early animal  life,
  and observe its beautiful legacy all around us,
  wherein we constantly recognize  parts of our primal selves,
  it is tempting to wonder why in the process of evolution  there emerged this phenomenon of consciousness
  that has bewildered and confounded philosophers  and mystics since the dawn of humanity's tribal structures.
  To approach this scientifically, we can not  allow consciousness' elusive nature
  to be a reason for giving up on trying to understand it.
  Because if consciousness is not a magical  exception and is rather a direct
  or indirect consequence of evolution,  just like every other
  the scientific conclusion is straight-forward:
  just like every other feature of the human brain and body,
  experience or consciousness is a tool that evolution has engineered for us
  through billions of years of mutations.
  Conscious forms of life showed a richer capacity  for learning and course-correcting.
  So evolution favored this development
  and nurtured it to a point where we became sentient,
  self-aware and capable of interpreting our  own evolutionary drives and our purpose in
  in ways that can even go against our own survival  if we so choose.
  So how would science then describe the mechanism  of consciousness?
  Surprisingly, most scientists do theorize  that consciousness is not simply inside our brain.
  Consciousness is generally considered to be  an emergent phenomenon of the brain.
  Meaning that consciousness happens when enough  activity takes place in the brain in a way
  in a way that can be compared to how music emerges  from a record player.
  The music is not anywhere to be found inside  the record player.
  Intuitively, we tend to say the music is on  the record,
  but even there we really only find a circular vinyl disk with peculiar grooves,
  it does not produce any sound or music at all.
  It is only when the mechanisms of the record  player are activated in a certain way that
  that all its activity produces an emergent phenomenon  that we call music.
  Consciousness is somewhat similar.
  We can't physically locate it at one point or in one area.
  And if we zoom in on the grey matter of our  brain,
  we find as much evidence for consciousness as we find tiny marbles inside a molecule.
  None at all.
  Yet when billions of neurons fire and communicate  with each other, the combination of this enormous
  amount of activity creates the phenomenon  of consciousness.
  But it would seem that this is far from a  complete summary of what brings it about.
  Because there is an inevitable consequence  that complicates things to an incredible degree.
  The more this emergent feature evolved in  ways that allow it to course-correct
  and significantly reprogram the brain,
  the more it became a  feedback loop of incredible complexity.
  When we point a webcam at a screen that displays  its input we see a seemingly infinite pattern,
  the brain does something similar with the  activity from its billions of firing neurons,
  resulting in an unimaginable depth of iterations and permutations
  that gives rise to what we  call consciousness or experience.
  This experience is not a goal,
  it is simply the ultimate tool that our brain has
  for finding its way and coming to grips with the consistent patterns of reality.
  We are the unfathomably intricate interplay  of what seems like infinite loops of neural processes.
  Our essence may have had humble beginnings,  but it exponentially grew on its voyage
  down the rabbit hole of boundlessly mirroring itself  and learning from each mirror image.
  Our brain waves ripple and reverberate, creating  constant feedback loops of wildly varying
  degrees of complexity before even a single  emotion, let alone a conscious thought can emerge,
  which then in itself inevitably brings  about feedback loops of higher levels of abstraction
  where it is no longer about the interaction  and cascade of neurochemical processes,
  but also of language, ideas and concepts that  then allow such magnitudes of recursive thinking
  that we become capable of observing and dissecting  the patterns of our own existence.
  We are incomparably more than the sum of our  parts.
  Which is why our evolution so greatly favored  this extraordinary capacity for reasoning
  and intuition and why it promoted us from  biological machines to sentient architects
  of our own future, tasked with making the  right decisions for ourselves and for our species.
  We are a feedback loop that is, depending  on how we choose to live,
  to greater or lesser  extent aware of its own mechanisms.
  We must also factor in the brain's remarkable  ability for changing itself.
  This is called neuroplasticity.
  Whatever it is that we are doing at any point  in time, we are training our brain to become
  better at performing those actions, for better  or for worse.
  While more pronounced at early age, neuroplasticity  and even neurogenesis, the creation of new
  brain cells, continues to take place throughout  our lives,
  shaping and reshaping the hardware of our consciousness every step of the way.
  And while human beings have a remarkable capacity  for rationality,
  enabling us to fly rockets to the moon
  and build incredible machinery  that allows us to dissect the fabric of the universe,
  we are also very emotional creatures.
  As we grow up, we for a big part learn and  shape our behavior
  through basic Pavlovian conditioning.
  In the famous psychological experiment by  Ivan Pavlov, a basic observation was that
  a dog tends to salivate as soon as he recognizes  learned indicators
  hinting that he may be rewarded with a treat.
  Same mechanisms are present in the reward  system of the human brain.
  As children, we innocently want to understand  the world.
  But if trying to understand things is not  rewarding enough, our brain adopts other strategies.
  An unfortunate phenomenon often observed in  psychology and also once famously described
  by Carl Sagan is that kindergartners or first-grade  kids tend to be sincere science enthusiasts
  with a genuine sense of wonder as they question  everything around them.
  But talk to children in the 12th grade and  much of this curiosity has become extinguished.
  If our natural tendency to logically question  things is discouraged
  and we are instead rewarded for actions that we often don't see the meaning of,
  the brain adapts to this and gradually gives up on independent logical inquiry.
  Instead, we become disproportionately dedicated  to seeking approval of others.
  Our opinions, our identity, our way of life  ends up depending on how we are judged
  by our social circle and by society at large.
  At the time of recording this documentary,
  fake news, post-truth and so-called 'alternative facts'  are much discussed topics.
  But these are mere symptoms of a much deeper  problem.
  One that goes beyond misinformation and imperfect  social media algorithms.
  And while we may not be aware of it, the Pavlovian  conditioning from our contemporary culture
  deeply defines how we look at life and by  extension how we intuitively perceive consciousness.
  To understand just how much culture constantly  evolves while it shapes our behaviors and beliefs,
  it can be helpful to look at how  much has changed even in recent history.
  Only around 15 years ago it was controversial  to ban smoking and cellphones were considered
  inappropriate for teenagers or for use on  public transport.
  Ten years ago we could barely imagine why  anyone would want to put random thoughts
  along with personal pictures on the Internet for  everyone to see.
  Now just about everyone including parents and grandparents have active Facebook  accounts.
  And in only a few years, taking selfies went  from a strange and narcissistic habit to a cultural norm.
  Keeping this in mind may then make it less  surprising when we consider that up until
  around 300 years back, people would brand  a great deal of our most commonplace routines
  as selfish, decadent and morally corrupt.
  As trivial and innocent of an act like buying  a box of our favorite cereals
  would fall into this category.
  While society gradually improves and evolves  over large periods of time,
  our culture takes many twists and turns along the way,
  some of which move us closer to valuing facts over fiction,
  some of which do not.
  Nevertheless, our conditioning lays much of  the groundwork for the operating system of our brain.
  In a constellation of brain regions known  as the Default Mode Network,
  information is constantly being processed even when we are seemingly at rest.
  This is partially why social conditioning  can have a profound impact on us
  while we are unaware of it.
  Our current mainstream culture is generally  defined as individualism,
  which finds its origins in the industrial revolution not long ago.
  And just as in previous eras, we go as far  as to sometimes rewrite history
  to fit our current narrative
  and we repurpose ancient  sayings such as "Carpe Diem" to support our beliefs.
  The complete sentence of the old latin poem  roughly translates to "do what you can today,
  to make tomorrow better"
  and it had no connection  with indulging in personal desires.
  While our scientific progress can tell us  a lot about the brain and even to significant
  extent about consciousness, our culture is  currently not so much geared towards trying
  to understand what we are.
  It is instead more focused on celebrating  the pursuit of fashionable personal interests.
  Ranging from material possessions to impressing our social circle,
  from momentary thrills to romantic adventures.
  The individual's desire and its freedom to  pursue it is currently our most cherished ideal.
  Many aspects of our society, most of all our economy, rely on our pursuit of these popularized objectives.
  Aside from rare exceptions like a futuristic  tv series about a unified humanity working
  to advance the species, culture has a way  of submerging us in signals that make us believe,
  without question, that the way we currently  perceive things is simply the way it has always been
  or at least the way it's meant to be.
  Not so long ago, we believed people of color were always inferior,
  the world was always flat
  and the gods always controlled the skies.
  In a cultural setting such as this, the brain's  reward system becomes,
  in a sense, disconnected from its purpose.
  Throughout evolution, the ways in which our  DNA has mutated and our brain has expanded
  have all been part of the same process:
  all these mechanisms simply try to overcome the obstacles in their path.
  Life fundamentally tries to align itself with  reality, genetically and biologically,
  instinctively  and intellectually.
  As children, the way we try to align ourselves  with reality is by imitating others,
  parents, friends, teachers and various cultural influences.
  The older and the more aware we become,
  the more capable our brain becomes at independently recognizing patterns
  and making abstractions.
  A duality arises.
  We possess the intelligence to grasp the consequences of our actions and of our inaction.
  Yet our Pavlovian reward-seeking urges pull  us in other directions,
  such as living up to the expectations of society and family.
  We feel fragile and dependent on the judgment  of others
  because our reward system values their approval more than logical deduction.
  We feel little satisfaction or even discouragement  when acting upon our own
  independent rational judgment.
  This confusing duality is a natural consequence  of a society wherein we never really grow up.
  We seek the approval of our guardians when  we are young.
  And we continue to seek approval of whichever  forces take over as we grow older.
  We become eternal validation-seekers.
  Neurons cluster together to create hierarchies  that end up determining the things we value most.
  In recent years, neuroscientists are even  beginning to come up with mathematical formulas
  that describe the exact way in which these  hierarchies are formed
  and how they process information.
  Different clusters of neurons talk to each  other in a beautifully organized fashion,
  to, among other things, figure out whether or not the reward system should be activated.
  A process that largely depends on our conditioning  and differs for each person.
  Learning what someone's reward system is primarily drawn to,
  often makes their behavior surprisingly  easy to map and understand.
  We can much better comprehend the cold-heartedness  of a career-fixated individual if success
  or social validation is what he or she craves  more than anything else.
  Or the sacrifice of someone who spends all  resources helping siblings or parents if family
  is this person's core drive.
  The blindness of a person who primarily chases  romantic adventures or the carelessness of
  a hedonistic thrill-seeker.
  We often create many additional rationales  around our actions
  to obscure our fundamental motivation.
  The collection of these rationalizations is  what constitutes our identity.
  Throughout our lives we may encounter milestones where our core value changes
  as a result of a paradigm shift or an identity crisis.
  Analyzing one's own actions over the years  through deep reflection or the practice of
  writing down an overview of one's key choices  in life
  can easily reveal what this core value  is for you.
  This can be an experience that is both enlightening  and sobering as it makes us see that our choices
  are rarely informed by the rationalizations  we afterwards come up with.
  They are mostly the result of a childish attachment that lurks in our subconscious.
  And the more self-aware we become, the more we feel a dissatisfaction
  with the pursuit of hollow goals.
  But this is not a deterministic trap that  we cannot escape from.
  We live in a probabilistic universe where  nothing is set in stone.
  Rather than vaguely philosophize about the  nature of free will, we can deduce that the
  that feedback loop of consciousness plays an active  role in processing information and making decisions.
  It has a say in what our most deeply rooted  core motivations are.
  Concepts and ideas only have power over us  when we emotionally invest and hold on to them.
  This brings up the question: in light of all  this knowledge, how do we correct our course?
  How do we truly find meaning in our lives  and experience the kind of fulfilment that
  most of us only catch glimpses of from time to time?
  It turns out that science has more answers  in these regards than is commonly assumed.
  It is widely understood that logic is our most  powerful ally in understanding and approaching reality.
  More than a cold and blunt instrument for  calculation,
  it is the closest thing to a force that holds our universe together.
  Our advances in physics continue to reveal  a mathematical framework
  underpinning anything and everything in our reality.
  Without these consistent patterns, nothing  would exist.
  Without its exquisite dance of aeons of genetic  iterations, we would not be able to think or feel.
  We often see logic as the opposite of emotion,  but instead it is the engine of our emotions
  and it provides reliable answers when we are  frustrated or confused.
  Logic is what creates rhythm or structure,
  it is fundamental in the melody of music
  and the colors and symmetry of flowers.
  It creates biological machinery so intricate  and rich that they can become self-aware,
  capable of love and selflessness
  and able to observe the majestic logical patterns that created them.
  We can trace our origins and the molecules  in our body back to the stars in which they
  were created and see that we are all connected.
  Over billions of years, these molecules configured themselves into complex units that we call human beings.
  These units are like cells in the body of  humanity,
  wired to evolve and move it forward.
  This is why we have a deep desire to find  meaning,
  to find an existential equilibrium:
  Evolution has fundamentally programmed us so that we want our beliefs to align with reality.
  Logic is, in a sense, the prime directive  of our consciousness.
  We must value it as such if we want to break  free from the clutches of hollow reward mechanisms.
  Evolution has put the feedback loop of experience in control of our brain.
  We make the calls.
  And while we intuitively navigate reality  with the compass of our reward system,
  we can change how this system operates.
  This is what happens in paradigm shifts or  identity crises.
  In religious transformations or in the minds  of many first-time parents.
  The reward system shifts its dominant focus.
  It's easy to think in absurd stereotypes when  we imagine a person primarily driven by logic.
  But for human beings, it would only be illogical to suppress emotions
  or disregard human needs.
  Instead, what is logical for humans is to  act in ways that are most efficient
  for the benefit of ourselves and of humanity.
  Part of the reasons why meditation and mindfulness  practices have scientifically measureable
  health and psychological benefits is precisely because they somewhat disconnect us from attachments
  that constantly take up mental energy and  generate dissonance.
  They also shift the brain's activity from  its Default Mode Network
  to what is called the Task-Positive Network and it allows us to more easily be selfless, clear-headed and focused.
  The simple act of intently putting focus on  our breathing throughout the day
  is enough to make this happen.
  It creates an awareness that is often described  as 'being in the present'
  or being in a state of flow,
  wherein rather than identifying with  our thoughts, we become an observer of them
  and are much more inclined to follow reason  over impulse.
  We become more capable of adjusting our beliefs and making conscious choices
  that rewire our brain's reward system.
  We can observe clear improvements in how, over the centuries, common subconscious core values
  have shifted away from things like  superstition.
  Perhaps at some point in our future, our cultures  will find common ground in simply valuing logic.
  As a society, we're currently still too obsessed with trivial differences and preferences to make such a drastic leap.
  But as individuals, we're fortunate to live  in a time where we have the freedom
  to question our cultural beliefs and choose our own path.
  Even our core values that hold tremendous  power over us and have been ingrained in our
  minds through decades of conditioning can be changed.
  While core values don't just change automatically, here is how one could adopt a more logic-oriented mindset.
  The first step would be to ensure one has  a genuine appreciation for logic,
  something that much of the audience watching this video may already have.
  It can be profoundly inspiring to learn about how logic underpins everything in the vast
  and intricate complexity of our universe
  and it can also be empowering to realize, as you learn,
  that even when we don't know them,  the logical answers to our questions exist.
  It also helps to be aware that science and  logic are not about certainties but about
  finding out what is most likely.
  Our universe is a probabilistic phenomenon.
  Even a hypothetically perfect simulation could not predict with complete certainty how events would unfold.
  There is a profound sense of acceptance in  acknowledging that nothing is ever truly certain,
  but with our brain's ability to reason, we  can come up with pretty good approximations
  of what the best course of action is at every  point in our lives.
  This first step can be achieved simply by  reflection or learning about logic and science
  from books and documentaries
  or rewatching this video.
  Step 2 is to identify your current core value.
  Find what emotionally drives you.
  In this step, you pinpoint what it is that  throughout your life your reward system has
  turned into its primary focus.
  It could simply be comfort, success or social validation.
  Making the conscious leap to adopt logic as a core value is step 3.
  This resolution is not about just implementing new habits but rather about fundamentally
  committing to doing the right thing at any  time, depending on your knowledge
  and the logical connections you make.
  Finding the courage and truly making this  click can be a euphoric or liberating experience.
  There is a wealth of knowledge and insight  available online on how this can be achieved
  for those who find it difficult.
  Although this difficulty is often an illusion  that simply takes some bravery to overcome.
  What has been observed thus far among people who go through this transformation is that
  is that those who ultimately make this leap with the intention of elevating their experience
  will eventually lose this newfound awareness.
  This is not due to a lack of discipline, but  rather due to a fundamental misunderstanding
  regarding consciousness that we are deeply conditioned with.
  It is a fallacy that most of us never verbalize or are even aware of
  and that sits at the heart of our misconceptions regarding our experience.
  You believe that there is a 'you' inside the  brain.
  Even as you watch this video, you've most  likely concluded at least subconsciously
  that there is still a 'you' in the ever-changing feedback loop of consciousness.
  That while we are an unfathomably complex and rich phenomenon of continuous information
  processing and near infinite iteration and  transmutation,
  that somehow at every instant and in every loop, a defining part of us survives.
  We believe this even though most cells in  our body die and are replaced over and over.
  The electrons that buzz through our neurons to generate our ongoing experience do not
  exist in any solid or intuitive sense of the  word
  and scientists find no trace of a self inside our brain.
  Each second, the consciousness that emerges from the grey matter mechanisms behind our
  eyes is different, sometimes unrecognizably  so, from what it was a second before.
  The truth is every moment we are a new entity  that existed only for that one single moment
  and will never manifest itself again.
  No experience can truly be replicated,
  no identity can ever reflect an ever-changing synergy
  and there is no self or I that can  persist in the endless stream of experience.
  Not even for an instant.
  The only place where there resides some notion of the imagined self,
  is in the proteins that were synthesized to store a memory of a moment that once occurred.
  As if the feedback loop of consciousness at that moment wrote in the machinery of our neurons:
  "I was here",
  so that the next iteration, the next loop that a new experience emerges from, might learn from it.
  But from fixating on faulty concepts of what we are,
  on stories of a phantom that we define as the self,
  we learn nothing of value.
  It is fascinating that sometimes science and ancient esoteric wisdoms seem to meet.
  The idea that there is no actual self is not  a new one.
  But it is one that is logical and has gained  more scientific support than other schools of thought.
  Life and death are concepts that do not seem  to apply in the ways that we think they do.
  Beyond outdated philosophical or religious  notions, we have no reasons at all
  to believe the human organism is inhabited by a spirit,
  but rather by a near-infinity of consciousnesses over time.
  And each manifestation is much more than a mere expression of our brain's neural activity.
  It is a culmination of all the interaction  that led to its emergence.
  Consciousness does not emerge from the brain like a genie from a bottle.
  In fact, without any influence from society,  in cases where children grow up in isolation,
  not raised by humans but among animals, the  brain does not adapt to the use of language
  and becomes forever incapable of speaking  or even conceptually thinking in the ways
  that we constantly do.
  So much of what we tend to label as intrinsic personality
  can not even exist on a basic level without sufficient interaction.
  Consciousness emerges from the vast interplay of stardust becoming aware,
  aeons of genetic mutation, thousands of generations laying the groundwork of language and culture
  necessary to form complex thoughts and finally, our  current society's conditioning, education,
  social influences and parental guidance.
  All elements combine to generate electrochemical fireworks inside our neurons
  to eventually create these instances of experience.
  All of it is interconnected.
  There are no limits or borders in what is  a part of our existence.
  Nothing is external.
  Even from a basic neurological perspective,  everything takes place within our consciousness.
  It comes as no surprise then that the most  intellectually and emotionally satisfying
  programming that our brain is capable of running is fundamentally selfless.
  The more we dismantle the hologram of our imaginary self,
  the more easily we accept our evolutionary drive to care for others
  and the more capable we are of understanding
  the sinister foundation of our individualist  conditioning.
  Our history is full of examples where mainstream narratives successfully hypnotize us into
  complacency and inaction as they attempt to blind or distract us from the damage we are doing.
  Some of the most iconic examples, the holocaust  and slavery, took place within the past few generations.
  Our inner selfish monster that we create as  a coping mechanism for our fears and uncertainties
  does not reflect what we really are.
  Even though its influence runs deep,
  since we begin the process of identifying and labeling  ourselves very early on in life.
  As children, we don't know any better
  and we often end up blaming ourselves for things that were either beyond our control
  or actions that we did not yet understand the consequences of.
  We gradually and subconsciously create flawed  beliefs that inhibit us.
  But beneath all of this remains what analytical  psychology calls the inner child.
  This is why many forms of therapy and meditation  focus on seeing our thoughts and emotions,
  even our mind, as separate from us.
  These practices have been well documented  to have profound effects on us.
  The more mindful we are, the more easily we  see our own values and beliefs as an observer,
  which allows us to change the ones that hold  us back.
  We are continuously flooded by subtle and  less subtle indicators that signal our subconsciousness
  and strengthen our belief that our experience is what matters most.
  We celebrate kindness and generosity strictly  within specific cultural confines,
  where the narrative is usually as follows:
  human beings might be inherently selfish, but since doing good feels good, we're not so bad after all.
  Simply hearing or saying this can summon positive  emotions.
  In fact, it's not uncommon to see this message applied in charity campaigns or for example during Christmas.
  It's been repeated to us in literal as well  as subliminal ways
  to the point that it became an omnipresent and oddly comforting belief
  that unfortunately has gaping inconsistencies
  and horrific implications.
  It's an unspoken slogan of the individualist  ideology that programs obedient consumers
  to only care when they stand to benefit themselves.
  It is perhaps the worst form of indoctrination when society makes us believe
  that the reason why we should primarily pursue selfish interests,
  is because we are not really capable of anything else.
  As we grow up, this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
  Because by valuing experience above all, we  legitimately turn into a population of selfish drones.
  And in the finest tradition of cultural obedience, many of us then defend ourselves
  when we hear of claims of selfless acts.
  These things do not really exist, many of  us say.
  Ignoring even the most obvious and common scenarios of parents who truly care for their children
  and gladly diminish the quality of  their own experience for them.
  This is where we awkwardly catch glimpses of the uneasy and unspoken agreement that binds us.
  We know that our ideology is a facade.
  A collection of excuses that we let ourselves and each other get away with.
  The 1% may benefit the most,
  but the greatest conspiracy of modern civilization does not come from the top.
  It is a collaboration that we all subconsciously agreed to and are sometimes uncomfortably aware of.
  In this ecosystem, the rare exceptions of  those who at some point truly value something more than experience
  easily end up conflicted.
  For a while, they may feel driven to fight  for a cause
  or sacrifice their luxuries for  a noble objective.
  But as soon as they somewhat ponder their  actions within a greater context,
  the compass of their intuition fails to come up with convincing answers as to whether they are truly doing
  what is right, making their endeavor unsustainable.
  We fall back on excuses that are so commonly accepted,
  we almost fully believe we should indeed trust and value our experience above all else.
  This makes us deeply vulnerable to all kinds of manipulation.
  Governments and corporations can dictate our behavior without advanced strategies or conspiracies.
  Politicians can scare us with insultingly  inaccurate claims and we will happily consume
  and we well happily consume poisonous substances if presented along with imagery of laughter and joy
  preferably from celebrities.
  Our indoctrination has made us pampered and passive.
  With this broken compass, we find ourselves somewhat puzzled when we reflect
  upon historical horrors like the holocaust:
  why did so few of the guards who witnessed the atrocities of concentration camps do something?
  How come they blindly obeyed orders and murdered  millions, either by pulling the trigger
  or simply assisting, making them guilty of the atrocities that were committed.
  Indoctrination can make us ignorant and the  sleep of reason can produce monsters.
  But we are not children any more.
  As adults, we are perfectly aware, sometimes  painfully so, that actions have consequences.
  Therefore, when we consider an individual who willingly keeps someone in a dungeon to die of starvation,
  we universally consider it wrong or evil.
  But when we become aware of the death and suffering that's been locked away in our own dungeon of ignorance,
  we ourselves become evil if we do not take action.
  In a world with a continuous stream of tragic events that we can easily influence,
  wherein we no longer need to risk our lives in order to make a difference,
  our inaction kills on a daily basis.
  While we mentally recite to ourselves the mantras we've been taught:
  "There's not much we can do."
  "We are not responsible."
  "They are far away."
  "Perhaps they even deserved it."
  For all our progress, we can sound eerily  similar to horrific echoes of the past:
  "We didn't know."
  "We were just following orders."
  Our culture has installed in our brains a  colossal switchboard of excuses.
  And there are many options for every occasion.
  It begins when we, as children, start to recognize the absurdity
  of many of the expectations placed upon us
  and innocently look for ways to dodge them.
  It becomes less innocent as we become more aware.
  Most of us grow older but don't grow up.
  Because it's not in our society's best interest to guide us into maturity.
  There is no profit to be made from it.
  So we band together in how we excuse our behavior and silently agree to conceal each other's hypocrisy.
  Confrontations that do take place are met  with empty defenses:
  "What about you?"
  "What about the government?"
  "I have to think about my future."
  "This offends me."
  "This is my belief."
  "This is my opinion."
  But whether arguing against global warming or vaccinations, for socialism or capitalism,
  for social justice or against political correctness, our opinions and beliefs do not dictate reality.
  Our identities and our rhetoric are meaningless  compared to the consequences of our inaction.
  And our innocent strategy of excuses that  once allowed us to skip our homework
  is no longer innocent among adults who are confronted with reality.
  That mechanism has run its course.
  The only teacher who now has authority to  assign our tasks and judge our excuses
  is our own inner voice of reason.
  When we selflessly resolve to adopt logic  as a core value,
  it sets us free from our fragile dependence of the judgment of others.
  Responsibility is simply a principle of acting in line with our ever-expanding knowledge and rationality.
  It does not depend on intersubjectivity.
  It is not dictated by our culture, our social  circle or politicians.
  Nor is it dependent on our fabricated freedom of choice.
  And many of the most historical acts of bravery came from those who took a stand for what is right,
  even in the face of adversity and cultural disparity.
  Such a profoundly selfless resolution can  seem scary, as it threatens all the conditioned
  attachments that emerge in a culture where  enjoyable feelings are considered the ultimate goal.
  But it leads to far more fulfilment than chasing our positive emotions like a carrot on a stick,
  as our ideology demands.
  In cases of drug addiction, usually only those who feel they have little else to live for
  become dependent on addictive substances.
  We've been led to believe the lie that the meaning of life is to chase the carrot of good emotions.
  But even with only our intuition, we feel  that this endless chase doesn't make much sense.
  The pay-off is never great enough.
  And those who choose to believe in a more  selfless and logical objective ironically
  tend to experience much more fulfilment in  their lives.
  It's a principle that has inspired ancient  spiritual concepts such as karma or heaven and hell:
  those who care most about their  own indulgences
  end up haunted or tormented by their own self-interest.
  But in modern cognitive psychology, it is  not just an esoteric idea.
  There is a huge range of academic research and literature on the subject, usually described
  in terms of the scarcity mindset and its opposite,  the abundance mindset.
  The brain operates in a mode of scarcity when we feel that there are things we lack.
  This is perhaps one of our brain's most ancient survival mechanisms
  and it's been well established that, while this can sharpen our focus,
  it also tends to take up enormous amounts of what is called 'mental bandwidth'.
  It hijacks our brain.
  It literally makes us less intelligent, more  self-centered and even drops our IQ.
  And every day, we are exposed to a near infinite array of societal impulses that are designed
  to lock us into this mental state.
  From a very young age onwards, we are deeply programmed with a set of requirements
  that must be fulfilled in order for us to experience abundance.
  Requirements that are often so elusive, that we become mostly entrapped in the scarcity mindset.
  But as soon as we see through this, which  can be achieved in many ways,
  we are able to distinguish truth from indoctrination, to dispel our confusion and dissolve our apathy.
  This presents us with a choice on how we lead our lives.
  If we make life about ourselves, we choose  to see everything
  through a lens of what we  can take rather than give back.
  But we intuitively sense that we're not doing  what is right and feel unworthy of being truly loved.
  And we either attempt to make peace with this
  or we succumb to insecurity and prefer to obfuscate the truth.
  But if love is defined as unconditional giving then love is all around us.
  It is in the structures left behind by our  ancestors
  and the heritage of our grandparents.
  It is in the care our parents have given us
  and the cells that make up what we are.
  It is in the social structures and the safety  nets that are forged into laws to protect us.
  It's in the sun that shines and the infinite  beauty that includes us.
  If we choose to be what we are and see our  life for what it truly is,
  then we realize it's about much more than just us.
  It is about caring and doing what is right.
  About giving back and using our understanding to combat ignorance.
  It is about trusting in our ability to do  so, trusting in our true selves.
  And letting ourselves be guided by our intuition, which knows right from wrong.
  No matter what challenges we face, when our heart guides us with reason on its side,
  our imagined problems fade away.
  Behind everything there is a logical reason  we can find
  when we choose to follow curiosity rather than fear.
  We don't have to feel regret or guilt when  we know our intentions are pure
  and we did the best we could at the time with the knowledge that we had.
  But it begins with a choice.
  A choice between pretense or honesty.
  Between fabricated scarcity or the abundance  of reality.
  Making life about ourselves or seeing that  it is not about you.
  A choice that is yours to make.
  The world can seem like a cold and dark place
  when this knowledge leads us to recognize  the selfish motives behind people's actions
  and how it causes idealistic movements to  scatter and fall apart.
  But with these insights, those who choose  to not make life about themselves
  can seek out and trust each other.
  This documentary illustrates how everyone  has this choice.
  But it will require a global movement where  those who truly care take action,
  organize and unite to bring about real change.
  
        
      
 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét