Thứ Ba, 23 tháng 1, 2018

Waching daily Jan 23 2018

[Announcer]: Welcome to The Painting Experience podcast for September 2015. On the

podcast founder, Stewart Cubley explores the potential of the emerging field of

process arts and shares inspiration from his ongoing workshops and retreats.

This month, Stewart takes a humorous look at why painting for process is important

even when you're not sure what the point is.

[Stewart]: It's often hard to justify the time

and the effort that we put into process painting because here you are painting

these paintings which really are not going to be used commercially. The point

is not to sell them, they're not going to be showing up in galleries, they're not

going to be making money, they're not even going to make you a name.

People aren't going to see them, mostly. On top of that they're not even

necessarily very pretty. I mean, sometimes, but a lot of the time the conventional

mind doesn't find the painting really attractive or pretty or or even pleasing

to hang in your room on your wall. Even meaning isn't something that can serve us;

there's often not even a story in the painting. Things appear and images show

up and one thing leads to another and it's a pretty long stretch to try to

string all this together with some coherent storyline. And I guess sometimes

we like to say well it's therapeutic, at least it's therapeutic. But this too

is a little bit of a stretch. There are times when you cannot find any kind of

insight or problem that's been solved or issue that you've been working on that's

been defined by the painting or that you can you actually say you're working on.

You're having feelings; the feelings guide you in the painting but you often

can't name them. You can't even say that you're dealing

with this feeling or that feeling so it's hard to explain to yourself and to

justify this bizarre activity of process painting. I think it's a very big

confrontation at times that this really rears its head and usually after a

certain period of time in which somebody has found the connection in themselves

with process painting. They're doing it, they're practicing it, and it's serving

them in some fashion and then all of a sudden this dragon raises its head. This

beast of justification: What's the point?

There's no product here. I hit this very

poignantly in my own development. I was in my 30s and we had been hosting The

Painting Experience and process painting for a number of years. And I was painting

regularly and I was also practicing Sand Play and Sand Play is a type of therapy

that was developed that uses figurines and objects and real-world items and

they're placed in the sand box. There's a sand box and we used to have four of

these in a room that was developed for this purpose. And we had shelves and

shelves and shelves of these figures and and there were dolls and there was

babies and there were spiders and there was red yarn that represented blood and

we had lightning and rain and I can't remember everything we could imagine we

actually had to make some of the things that were not so so readily available.

And we had these four sand trays in the room and we didn't use it therapeutically,

we used it from a process point of view. So, very often when someone was stuck or

at a dead end in their painting experience, we would bring them up and

have them do what we call the Sand Play. And it was often really powerful in

unlocking the creative flow again because, for one, the images and objects were

already created you didn't need to paint them so they were right there. And you

could just pick them up and put them in the in the sand and then you could act

really without thinking you would just see what you're attracted to and put it

there and into something else and put it there and this whole journey would

unfold. And we would not impose on it that there had to be any kind of

explanation of course or any kind of interpretation of what appeared in the

sand and it was really important to finish it and to go to the end of it and

usually at the end there was some sort of flow, the stream was opened again. And

it was possible to return to the painting and to continue so I would

often get up in the morning and do this the first thing. It was kind of a special

time because my thinking mind had not really awakened yet and kind of openness.

And I would go down to the Sand Play room and actually it was on the second

floor of this house in San Francisco. The first floor had the studio and it's next

to this window looking out over the street. It's early in the morning and I'm

still in my pajamas because I just gotten out of bed and and came into the

Sand Play room and I'm starting to build my Sand Play. And I pick up this sort of

doll it's kind of like a kewpie doll or I don't know what but it was a female

figure and I'm standing there and I see a movement outside the window and I look

out and here are these two young men, my age, in their 30s, dressed in their finest

with their suits and ties on heading for what I imagined to be the financial

district of San Francisco or some high paying job that they are pursuing and

making their way in the world. And they look at me through the window and here I

am in my pajamas standing with this doll in my hand playing in the sand.

I just wilted. I just got hit with incredible perspective of the friction of

these two worlds coming together. It was like what am I doing? Who have I become?

Playing with dolls? When I should be out in the world making my way and

developing a career and becoming important in some fashion. Or at least

creating a niche for myself. And here I am playing with dolls. This took me a

number of weeks to integrate. I had to really come back to the root and of

course I was supported by the early decision I had made to actually leave

more conventional activities and to not pursue my studies because I was called

by something that didn't quite fit and was not really so recognized and really

not so explainable. But at that moment it was a very challenging time for me to

justify what I was doing, because we live in a culture in which, if there's no

product, there's no point. It's drilled into us over and over again

from so many different angles and directions that that we have to have an

intention behind what we're doing, we have to know where we're going, we

have to know what our goal is, we have to know what it means to be doing what

we're doing and if you don't do that, you're lost. You're a loser. And I certainly

felt a loser at that moment I felt like a big loser. And on top of that, I didn't

even have a lineage to rely on. If I was meditating at least I could rely and

fall back upon the centuries of people who have been sitting in meditation and

the wise words of the Masters and the encouragement of the community. But here

in process painting and playing in the sand

there's no lineage. There's not much of a lineage; it's pretty "out there" and

it's not really recognized. And this is an incredibly poignant moment

for me. I think it was at this time that I came to realize that this practice was

something that was not going to be easily sanctioned by society at large.

And that it was forever going to have an outsider status, it was never gonna fit.

And I think this was the struggle that I was feeling at that time, was that I was

trying to make it fit. And there was something incredibly releasing about

realizing, wait a minute, it's not going to fit. It's never going to fit.

It shouldn't fit. It's not even meant to fit. That this practice of process arts is a

probing of the essential freedom in human nature that is not usurped by

definition and structure and interpretation and intention or

motivation. It's something incredibly wild.

So when I see people come up

against this crisis which often occurs after a certain period of time in which

they've given over to this creative force in themselves and felt the

nurturing aspect of it and felt how fulfilling it is and then get slammed by

this question of "What am I doing?" How do I justify spending my time accomplishing

nothing. I see this as a very fruitful confrontation because basically it can't

be justified. It stands on its own for what it is. It represents the mystery

within the human psyche and so the real question is: "Are you interested in

rubbing shoulders with the mystery?" I hope you are.

[Announcer]: You can learn more about The Painting Experience and find a list of upcoming

process painting workshops by visiting our website at www.processarts.com.

If you enjoyed what you heard today, please share it with a friend.

The theme music for this podcast comes from Stephan Jacob. We thank you for listening

and hope you'll join us again soon.

For more infomation >> Intuitive Painting Process Explained: No Product, No Problem - Duration: 11:23.

-------------------------------------------

SPREAD POSITIVITY TO YOUR COMMUNITY 💗 JUSTICE - Duration: 1:41.

Hi I'm a Girls With Heart Ambassador Khloe,

and I'm going to spread positivity with Bo

the Llamacorn.

Bo is going to come with me to do a care bag day.

A care bag day is when I gather up a whole

bunch of people

and we- me and my mom we make and fill the bags

and then we meet up in a certain spot

and we pass out the care bags.

I have my own non profit organization

called Khloe Kares, where I make

and design my bags.

And I fill them with important care necessities,

we would use on a daily basis.

Like deodorant, soap, toothbrushes,

toothpaste and anything else we may need.

And these bags are passed out to homeless women

who are sitting on the streets.

So this is my sewing machine

and this sewing machine is used to make all the care bags.

So the care bags are a little whiter

than what we usually use because

we are going to be drawing and decorating on them

so they can look pretty!

So this is where care bag day begins.

So we have our bags, and then we have some stuff

that we're going to be putting inside the bags.

But we are going to make giftbags

and we're going to stuff scarfs in them.

And we'll show you what we do.

So whenever we're done packing our bags,

I always take a picture in front of my care bags.

Bo's going to be joining me today.

Thank you for watching my video.

Now it's your turn to go spread some positivity!

For more infomation >> SPREAD POSITIVITY TO YOUR COMMUNITY 💗 JUSTICE - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

For The First Time Google's AI Makes Its Own Creepy AI Children - Duration: 2:48.

For The First Time Google's AI Makes Its Own Creepy AI Children

Google�s experimentations with artificial intelligence are going from strength to strength.

Hot on the heels of creating an expert chess master AI in a mere matter of hours, the company

has now created an AI which is capable of producing its artificial intelligent programs.

The creations of the so-called parent bot have shown an enormous capacity for improvement

in the analysis, going from analyzing simple words to showing comprehension of complex

images in only a few months.

New Google AI can create its super-advanced children

This particular AI project is known as the AutoML system (Automated Machine Learning).

It works by having a controller AI � referred to as the parent � which creates the designs

for the �child� AI.

The child is then given a task which it completes and then sends feedback back to its creator.

The creator then uses the information to create a second child with various improvements on

the first.

It is hoped that this process will allow the parent AI to produce specific programs which

will be far more sophisticated than anything that human engineers will be able to produce.

�Our approach can design models that achieve accuracies on par with state-of-art models

designed by machine learning experts (including some on our team!), � said a representative

from the company.

Google representatives have also said that the parent AI is coming up with completely

innovative design features that the researchers cannot explain.

The fact that the new child AIs are becoming increasingly better at dealing with images

may make a major difference in how human beings use the internet.

Many websites use captcha, a program which asks humans to decipher a simple image-based

problem to prove that they are not a robot since AIs have historically been unable to

deal with images.

However, now they are becoming better, this technology will have to evolve to catch up

with the rate of change means that a completely new solution to preventing spam bots from

running wild on the internet might be needed.

For more infomation >> For The First Time Google's AI Makes Its Own Creepy AI Children - Duration: 2:48.

-------------------------------------------

Weird News: Justin Bieber Gives His Mom a Foot Massage - Duration: 2:11.

Hit the subscribe button and press the bell icon to get more take videos

Justin Bieber gives his mama foot massage

weird or not

Justin Bieber was seen massaging his mom Pattie Mallette

Broken foot while on vacation with her in the Maldives and many fans seem grossed out by it

Justin Bieber may not be a doctor

But he sure was acting like one while on vacation in the Maldives with his mom Pattie Mallette on January

22nd as we previously told you Pattie has been stuck in a wheelchair the last couple of days as she unfortunately

Broke her foot during their mother-son vacation and now it looks like Justin has been trying to comfort her

Starting with a foot massage Pattie took to Instagram on January

22nd where she posted a story video of Justin giving her a massage

You're not a doctor. Don't touch it. She joked with a caption then she pretended

He responded back by saying I care out

And then she asked her followers if she should trust Justin or not, lol

It seems like a sweet thing for Justin to do but Twitter isn't a huge fan of this massage

Some fans have said it's pretty weird for a son to massage his mom's foot but will refrain from making a judgement

Instead we'll just show you what Justin's fans have been saying about the new video am I the only one who thinks

Justin Bieber and his mom are too touchy-feely with eco thir and too close is what one Twitter user

asked others asked similar questions

There were also a few people who said things like yikes. It's weird

Fortunately for Justin though a lot of people found the video to be cute

For instance take a look at the tweet below with the video and a caption saying this is not funny

But look at this laugh, um I can't laughing so much if Justin Bieber your laugh is everything and stop hurting your mom

For more infomation >> Weird News: Justin Bieber Gives His Mom a Foot Massage - Duration: 2:11.

-------------------------------------------

Homekeepers - Dr. David Clarke, Christian Counselor and Relationship Expert - Duration: 28:32.

For more infomation >> Homekeepers - Dr. David Clarke, Christian Counselor and Relationship Expert - Duration: 28:32.

-------------------------------------------

🙂 УЧИМ ЦВЕТА 🌈 Развивающее видео 😃 Для детей 😺 Тематические карточки по методике Домана 👍 - Duration: 1:25.

For more infomation >> 🙂 УЧИМ ЦВЕТА 🌈 Развивающее видео 😃 Для детей 😺 Тематические карточки по методике Домана 👍 - Duration: 1:25.

-------------------------------------------

Как заработать на перископе.В чём фишка перископа.Periscope для заработка.Перископ как заработок. - Duration: 2:36.

For more infomation >> Как заработать на перископе.В чём фишка перископа.Periscope для заработка.Перископ как заработок. - Duration: 2:36.

-------------------------------------------

Plot Twists That Basically Ruined the Movie - Duration: 6:40.

A well-crafted plot twist can take a movie from good to great—in fact, some movies

are regarded as classics specifically because of twists that completely recontextualize

the story.

But sending the narrative in an unexpected direction sometimes just ends up making a

film worse.

As great as it feels to be surprised by an excellent plot twist, these movies would have

been better off without them.

As always, beware the spoilers ahead.

Remember Me

There's nothing wrong with a simple romance movie, and as far as that element goes, Remember

Me isn't too bad.

Its leads, Robert Pattinson and Emilie de Ravin, are solid enough

in their roles and boast some nice chemistry.

And while it may veer into cliché, the film still certainly has its charms.

But all of that goes completely and inexplicably down the drain in the movie's final moments.

The film has become infamous for its final act, which reveals that the entire story has

been leading up to Robert Pattinson's character being in the World Trade Center on September

11th.

It's a subject matter that Remember Me bungles badly, taking a horrific tragedy and using

it as cheap emotional manipulation.

"I mean, why aren't you RIVETED?"

Aside from being deeply insensitive, it's also a case of blown potential, as the romantic

drama is just fine without resorting to the careless and contrived finale.

The Village

The biggest problem with The Village is that its twist turns it into a much worse movie.

Writer-director M. Night Shyamalan's last-act plot twists helped launch his career, but

they ended up becoming notorious to the point of parody after this one.

The horror film appears to center on a small 19th century village, which has been surrounded

by mysterious monsters, but it's actually revealed that the creatures don't exist.

They're just the town elders in costume, trying to scare people into staying put in their

safe community.

That's all well and good enough until the second twist arrives to reveal the film actually

takes place in the modern day, and the village elders created these monsters to keep their

people protected from the woes of the outside world.

With just the first twist in place, the movie might work as solid social commentary, but

the second rug pull makes the movie needlessly convoluted.

Spectre

Given the film's title, it's not surprising that Spectre centers on the villainous organization

headed up by Ernst Blofeld, one of 007's greatest villains, or that Christoph Waltz was brought

in to portray the criminal mastermind, despite some slack attempts at secrecy.

"So, thank you, cuckoo."

But instead of simply rebooting the iconic villain, Waltz's character is also eventually

revealed to be Bond's adoptive brother, making a surprise return after faking his own death.

The twist is completely superfluous: the original Blofeld is a force of pure evil, and he doesn't

need to be tied to Bond in any way to be effective.

The revelation that Bond has a secret brother who ended up orchestrating the events in the

previous Daniel Craig-led Bond films strains all credibility for his run in the franchise.

"It was me, James.

The author of all your pain."

Put simply, it's a twist that twists too hard.

Savages

Oliver Stone's film adaptation of Savages initially seems to end like the book— with

the demise of basically every character providing a sort of closure.

It also fits in well with the way the storytellers want viewers to see the three main characters—they're

too wild for this world, and it only makes sense for them to go out in a blaze of glory.

Unfortunately, Stone tacks on a twist wherein the ending is revealed to be an elaborate

fantasy playing out in the head of one character.

Instead, the bad guys get arrested and the good guys get out clean, riding off into the

sunset.

This disjointed happy ending isn't just a cheat—it feels like a painfully safe move.

High Tension

When crafting a good plot twist, it's incredibly important to consider whether it upends the

plausibility of the story.

Unfortunately for Alexandre Aja's High Tension, its Hail Mary of a twist ending—in which

the killer is revealed to be a dissociative identity of the protagonist—sends plausibility

down the drain.

The film, up until that point, is a pretty straightforward slasher that stands out for

its artful gore.

So why the needless twist?

Shots filmed from the villain's point of view make little sense after the twist, and the

film's opening is even more confusing when it's watched while knowing who the killer

turns out to be.

Secret Window

Speaking of misuse of dissociative identity disorder, Secret Window also stumbles in its

presentation of the illness.

It should be a slam dunk of a movie.

Based on a Stephen King short story, it's about a writer who retreats to a cabin in

the woods to craft his next book, only to be confronted by a deranged stranger named

Shooter who claims he has plagiarized one of his works.

"You stole my story."

Tensions between the two escalate and eventually turn to violence.

The twist is that Shooter doesn't exist and is instead a result of our lead's mental unwellness,

which—conveniently—has never manifested in the movie until this moment.

Sometimes this twist works, like with Fight Club and Primal Fear.

But in Secret Window, it comes off as uninspired, which is ironic considering how much we hear

about stories needing to stick the landing throughout.

"The only thing that matters is the ending."

Scream 3

The first film in the Scream franchise features a twist that is revelatory for the horror

genre: there are two culprits behind the film's slaughter spree, not just one.

"Surprise Sidney."

The twist is so good that it's repeated in the sequel, Scream 2, and still mostly works.

For the third film, though, the filmmakers go with a new twist, it ends up being just

plain dumb.

Part of the reason the first two films in the franchise enjoy such reverence is that

they function as critiques of the genre—they're self-aware, and skewer the typical tropes

that had started to bore audiences.

The problem with Scream 3's needlessly complicated reveal is that it resembles something from

the films the franchise itself satirizes.

The revelation that the baddie in this film is Scream protagonist Sidney's secret half-brother—and

that he has effectively orchestrated the events of the entire series—is completely unbelievable.

It's a jump-the-shark moment in a franchise that scoffs at cliche and closes out the original

series with a whimper instead of, well, a scream.

But, hey, credit to Stu for trying to tie everything together and save the story…

again.

"If you find yourself dealing with a backstory and a preponderance of exposition, then the

sequel rules do not apply."

Thanks for watching!

Click the Looper icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> Plot Twists That Basically Ruined the Movie - Duration: 6:40.

-------------------------------------------

YOUTUBE'DAN NASIL PARA KAZANILIR!? - YOUTUBE PARA KAZANMA - Duration: 2:08.

For more infomation >> YOUTUBE'DAN NASIL PARA KAZANILIR!? - YOUTUBE PARA KAZANMA - Duration: 2:08.

-------------------------------------------

Jim Acosta Tried Blaming GOP For Shutdown, Then Mick Mulvaney Re - Duration: 3:39.

Jim Acosta Tried Blaming GOP For Shutdown, Then Mick Mulvaney Reminded Him How Math Works

With the failure to pass a spending bill Friday night, America has seen its first government

shut down since 2013.

The process � which complicates the lives of federal workers, deployed military and

millions of Americans throughout the nation � has been named the �Shumer Shutdown�

due to a lack of votes from Senate Democrats, who demanded a resolution for DACA.

Yet, during a media briefing on Friday, CNN reporter Jim Acosta took it a step further

by inquiring why the shutdown was aptly named the �Schumer Shutdown� when Republicans

were the ones controlling the Senate.

Come on, you know the answer to that as well as anybody,� White House Budget Director

Mick Mulvaney answered, adding that he has to �laugh� when others try to bring up

this topic.

�You know as well as anybody that it takes 60 votes in the Senate to pass an appropriations

bill, right, you know that?� Mulvaney asked.

�I know that,� Acosta replied.

�Okay, so when you only have 51 votes in the Senate, then you have to have Democrat

support in order to fund the government,� Mulvaney said.

�So that�s the answer to your question.�

�This is purely an attempt by the Senate Democrats, led by Mr. Schumer, that�s why

we call it the �Schumer shutdown,� in order to try and get a shutdown that they

think this president gets blamed for,� he added.

Mulvaney went on to further explain that Democrats in the Senate demanded a solution for DREAMers,

though the issue was �non-fiscal.�

The budget director added that there was no reason the White House had to deal with DACA

until even mid-February, as it doesn�t expire until March 5.

�This is purely an attempt by Senate Democrats, led by Mr. Schumer � in order to try and

get a shutdown that they think this president gets blamed for,� Mulvaney added.

And it seems the ones that will be affected the most by the shutdown, may not be the ones

who voted � or didn�t vote � at all.

The last shutdown in 2013, according to ABC News, lasted 16 days, where nearly 800,000

federal employees were out of work without pay.

Additionally, the paychecks were delayed for nearly a million other working employees,

with them seeing the retroactive pay by day five of the shutdown.

However, according to reports, some members of Congress continued to collect their paychecks,

though some volunteered to give theirs up, as salaries for members of the House and Senate

are written into permanent law.

The last shutdown was estimated to cost America $1.5 billion per day, with a total of $24

billion spent.

What do you think?

Scroll down to comment below.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét