To
the People of the State of New-York.
There can be no free government where the people are not possessed of the power of making
the laws by which they are governed, either in their own persons, or by others substituted
in their stead.
Experience has taught mankind, that legislation by representatives is the most eligible, and
the only practicable mode in which the people of any country can exercise this right, either
prudently or beneficially.
But then, it is a matter of the highest importance, in forming this representation, that it be
so constituted as to be capable of understanding the true interests of the society for which
it acts, and so disposed as to pursue the good and happiness of the people as its ultimate
end.
The object of every free government is the public good, and all lesser interests yield
to it.
That of every tyrannical government, is the happiness and aggrandisement of one, or a
few, and to this the public felicity, and every other interest must submit.—The reason
of this difference in these governments is obvious.
The first is so constituted as to collect the views and wishes of the whole people in
that of their rulers, while the latter is so framed as to separate the interests of
the governors from that of the governed.
The principle of self love, therefore, that will nfluence the one to promote the good
of the whole, will prompt the other to follow its own private advantage.
The great art, therefore, in forming a good constitution, appears to be this, so to frame
it, as that those to whom the power is committed shall be subject to the same feelings, and
aim at the same objects as the people do, who transfer to them their authority.
There is no possible way to effect this but by an equal, full and fair representation;
this, therefore, is the great desideratum in politics.
However fair an appearance any government may make, though it may possess a thousand
plausible articles and be decorated with ever so many ornaments, yet if it is deficient
in this essential principle of a full and just representation of the people, it will
be only like a painted sepulcher—For, without this it cannot be a free government; let the
administration of it be good or ill, it still will be a government, not according to the
will of the people, but according to the will of a few.
To test this new constitution then, by this principle, is of the last importance—It
is to bring it to the touch-stone of national liberty, and I hope I shall be excused, if,
in this paper, I pursue the subject commenced in my last number, to wit, the necessity of
an equal and full representation in the legislature.—In that, I showed that it was not equal, because
the smallest states are to send the same number of members to the senate as the largest, and,
because the slaves, who afford neither aid or defence to the government, are to encrease
the proportion of members.
To prove that it was not a just or adequate representation, it was urged, that so small
a number could not resemble the people, or possess their sentiments and dispositions.
That the choice of members would commonly fall upon the rich and great, while the middling
class of the community would be excluded.
That in so small a representation there was no security against bribery and corruption.
The small number which is to compose this legislature, will not only expose it to the
danger of that kind of corruption, and undue influence.
which will arise from the gift of places of honor and emolument, or the more direct one
of bribery, but it will also subject it to another kind of influence no less fatal to
the liberties of the people, though it be not so flagrantly repugnant to the principles
of rectitude.
It is not to be expected that a legislature will be found in any country that will not
have some of its members, who will pursue their private ends. and for which they will
sacrifice the public good.
Men of this character are, generally, artful and designing, and frequently possess brilliant
talents and abilities; they commonly act in concert, and agree to share the spoils of
their country among them; they will keep their object ever in view, and follow it with constancy.
To effect their purpose, they will assume any shape, and, Proteus like, mould themselves
into any form— where they find members proof against direct bribery or gifts of offices,
they will endeavor to mislead their minds by specious and false reasoning, to impose
upon their unsuspecting honesty by an affectation of zeal for the public good; they will form
juntos, and hold out-door meetings; they will operate upon the good nature of their opponents,
by a thousand little attentions, and teize them into compliance by the earnestness of
solicitation.
Those who are acquainted with the manner of conducting business in public assemblies,
know how prevalent art and address are in carrying a measure, even over men of the best
intentions, and of good understanding.
The firmest security against this kind of improper and dangerous influence, as well
as all other, is a strong and numerous representation: in such a house of assembly, so great a number
must be gained over, before the private views of individuals could be gratified that there
could be scarce a hope of success.
But in the foederal assembly, seventeen men are all that is necessary to pass a law.
It is probable, it will seldom happen that more than twenty-five will be requisite to
form a majority, when it is considered what a number of places of honor and emolument
will be in the gift of the executive, the powerful influence that great and designing
men have over the honest and unsuspecting, by their art and address, their soothing manners
and civilities, and their cringing flattery, joined with their affected patriotism; when
these different species of influence are combined, it is scarcely to be hoped that a legislature,
composed of so small a number, as the one proposed by the new constitution, will long
resist their force.
A farther objection against the feebleness of the representation is, that it will not
possess the confidence of the people.
The execution of the laws in a free government must rest on this confidence, and this must
be founded on the good opinion they entertain of the framers of the laws.
Every government must be supported, either by the people having such an attachment to
it, as to be ready, when called upon, to support it, or by a force at the command of the government,
to compel obedience.
The latter mode destroys every idea of a free government; for the same force that may be
employed to compel obedience to good laws, might, and probably would be used to wrest
from the people their constitutional liberties.—Whether it is practicable to have a representation
for the whole union sufficiently numerous to obtain that confidence which is necessary
for the purpose of internal taxation, and other powers to which this proposed government
extends, is an important question.
I am clearly of opinion, it is not, and therefore I have stated this in my first number, as
one of the reasons against going into an entire consolidation of the states—one of the most
capital errors in the system, is that of extending the powers of the foederal government to objects
to which it is not adequate, which it cannot exercise without endangering public liberty,
and which it is not necessary they should possess, in order to preserve the union and
manage our national concerns; of this, however, I shall treat more fully in some future paper—But,
however this may be.
certain it is, that the representation in the legislature is not so formed as to give
reasonable ground for public trust.
In order for the people safely to repose themselves on their rulers, they should not only be of
their own choice.
But it is requisite they should be acquainted with their abilities to manage the public
concerns with wisdom.
They should be satisfied that those who represent them are men of integrity, who will pursue
the good of the community with fidelity; and will not be turned aside from their duty by
private interest, or corrupted by undue influence; and that they will have such a zeal for the
good of those whom they represent, as to excite them to be diligent in their service; but
it is impossible the people of the United States should have sufficient knowledge of
their representatives, when the numbers are so few, to acquire any rational satisfaction
on either of these points.
The people of this state will have very little acquaintance with those who may be chosen
to represent them; a great part of them will, probably, not know the characters of their
own members, much less that of a majority of those who will compose the foederal assembly;
they will consist of men, whose names they have never heard, and whose talents and regard
for the public good, they are total strangers to; and they will have no persons so immediately
of their choice so near them, of their neighbours and of their own rank in life, that they can
feel themselves secure in trusting their interests in their hands.
The representatives of the people cannot, as they now do, after they have passed laws,
mix with the people, and explain to them the motives which induced the adoption of any
measure, point out its utility, and remove objections or silence unreasonable clamours
against it.—The number will be so small that but a very few of the most sensible and
respectable yeomanry of the country can ever have any knowledge of them: being so far removed
from the people, their station will be elevated and important, and they will be considered
as ambitious and designing.
They will not be viewed by the people as part of themselves, but as a body distinct from
them, and having separate interests to pursue; the consequence will be, that a perpetual
jealousy will exist in the minds of the people against them; their conduct will be narrowly
watched; their measures scrutinized; and their laws opposed, evaded, or reluctantly obeyed.
This is natural, and exactly corresponds with the conduct of individuals towards those in
whose hands they intrust important concerns.
If the person confided in, be a neighbour with whom his employer is intimately acquainted,
whose talents, he knows, are sufficient to manage the business with which he is charged,
his honesty and fidelity unsuspected, and his friendship and zeal for the service of
this principal unquestionable, he will commit his affairs into his hands with unreserved
confidence, and feel himself secure; all the transactions of the agent will meet with the
most favorable construction, and the measures he takes will give satisfaction.
But, if the person employed be a stranger, whom he has never seen, and whose character
for ability or fidelity he cannot fully learn—If he is constrained to choose him, because it
was not in his power to procure one more agreeable to his wishes, he will trust him with caution,
and be suspicious of all his conduct.
If then this government should not derive support from the good will of the people,
it must be executed by force, or not executed at all; either case would lead to the total
destruction of liberty.—The convention seemed aware of this, and have therefore provided
for calling out the militia to execute the laws of the union.
If this system was so framed as to command that respect from the people, which every
good free government will obtain, this provision was unnecessary—the people would support
the civil magistrate.
This power is a novel one, in free governments—these have depended for the execution of the laws
on the Posse Comitatus, and never raised an idea, that the people would refuse to aid
the civil magistrate in executing those laws they themselves had made.
I shall now dismiss the subject of the incompetency of the representation, and proceed, as I promised,
to shew, that, impotent as it is, the people have no security that they will enjoy the
exercise of the right of electing this assembly, which, at best, can be considered but as the
shadow of representation.
By section 4, article I, the Congress are authorized, at any time, by law, to make,
or alter, regulations respecting the time, place, and manner of holding elections for
senators and representatives, except as to the places of choosing senators.
By this clause the right of election itself, is, in a great measure, transferred from the
people to their rulers.—One would think, that if any thing was necessary to be made
a fundamental article of the original compact, it would be, that of fixing the branches of
the legislature, so as to put it out of its power to alter itself by modifying the election
of its own members at will and pleasure.
When a people once resign the privilege of a fair election, they clearly have none left
worth contending for.
It is clear that, under this article, the foederal legislature may institute such rules
respecting elections as to lead to the choice of one description of men.
The weakness of the representation, tends but too certainly to confer on the rich and
well-born, all honours; but the power granted in this article, may be so exercised, as to
secure it almost beyond a possibility of controul.
The proposed Congress may make the whole state one district, and direct, that the capital
(the city of New-York, for instance) shall be the place for holding the election; the
consequence would be, that none but men of the most elevated rank in society would attend,
and they would as certainly choose men of their own class; as it is true what the Apostle
Paul saith, that "no man ever yet hated his own flesh, but nourisheth and cherisheth
it."—They may declare that those members who have the greatest number of votes, shall
be considered as duly elected; the consequence would be that the people, who are dispersed
in the interior parts of the state, would give their votes for a variety of candidates,
while any order, or profession, residing in populous places, by uniting their interests,
might procure whom they pleased to be chosen—and by this means the representatives of the state
may be elected by one tenth part of the people who actually vote.
This may be effected constitutionally, and by one of those silent operations which frequently
takes place without being noticed, but which often produces such changes as entirely to
alter a government, subvert a free constitution, and rivet the chains on a free people before
they perceive they are forged.
Had the power of regulating elections been left under the direction of the state legislatures,
where the people are not only nominally but substantially represented, it would have been
secure; but if it was taken outof their hands, it surely ought to have been fixed on such
a basis as to have put it out of the power of the foederal legislature to deprive the
people of it by law.
Provision should have been made for marking out the states into districts, and for choosing,
by a majority of votes, a person out of each of them of permanent property and residence
in the district which he was to represent.
If the people of America will submit to a constitution that will vest in the hands of
any body of men a right to deprive them by law of the privilege of a fair election, they
will submit to almost any thing.
Reasoning with them will be in vain, they must be left until they are brought to reflection
by feeling oppression—they will then have to wrest from their oppressors, by a strong
hand.
that which they now possess, and which they may retain if they will exercise but a moderate
share of prudence and firmness.
I know it is said that the dangers apprehended from this clause are merely imaginary, that
the proposed general legislature will be disposed to regulate elections upon proper principles,
and to use their power with discretion, and to promote the public good.
On this, I would observe, that constitutions are not so necessary to regulate the conduct
of good rulers as to restrain that of bad ones.—Wise and good men will exercise power
so as to promote the public happiness under any form of government.
If we are to take it for granted, that those who administer the government under this system,
will always pay proper attention to the rights and interests of the people, nothing more
was necessary than to say who should be invested with the powers of government, and leave them
to exercise it at will and pleasure.
Men are apt to be deceived both with respect to their own dispositions and those of others.
Though this truth is proved by almost every page of the history of nations, to wit, that
power, lodged in the hands of rulers to be used at discretion, is almost always exercised
to the oppression of the people, and the aggrandizement of themselves; yet most men think if it was
lodged in their hands they would not employ it in this manner.—Thus when the prophet
Elisha told Hazael, "I know the evil that thou wilt do unto the children of Israel;
their strong holds wilt thou set on fire, and their young men, wilt thou slay with the
sword, and wilt dash their children, and rip up their women with child."
Hazael had no idea that he ever should be guilty of such horrid cruelty, and said to
the prophet, "Is thy servant a dog that he should do this great thing."
Elisha answered, "The Lord hath shewed me that thou shalt be king of Syria."
The event proved, that Hazael only wanted an opportunity to perpetrate these enormities
without restraint, and he had a disposition to do them, though he himself knew it not.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét