Title: Hip Hop Jazz & Hip Hop Jazz Instrumental: 10 Hours of Hip Hop Jazz Playlist Mix Video
For more infomation >> Oh No! South Park Map || Part 6 - Duration: 0:08. 
For more infomation >> حلقه 10 قسم1 من مسلسل( سر جميل | Beautiful Secret ) مترجمه - Duration: 5:01. 
Here's Why There's No More Free Passes For The Clinton Foundation
by Tyler Durden
A new Department of Justice probe of the email and charity fraud scandals won't end well
for Bill or Hillary...
Until recently, the Clinton Foundation has been monitored by the IRS, the Department
of Justice, and the FBI, and multiple state government authorities that are seeded with
persons loyal to either the Clintons or the Obamas
But now it appears key authorities may finally be turning strict attention toward answering
tough questions about public filings of Clinton �charities� inside and outside the United
States.
When these powerful organizations engage motivated minds, they will wish to concentrate on a
few areas that have long gone begging for attention.
The first time the Clinton Foundation was investigated, between 2001 and 2005, then-FBI
Director Robert Mueller, then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey, and others could not
seem to find obvious and escalating frauds as a supposed presidential library complex
in Little Rock, Arkansas, also �fought HIV/AIDS internationally� from unregistered offices
in New York and Massachusetts without ever obtaining required audits of worldwide activities.
Strangely, as the first investigation wound down, evidence in the public domain suggests
that the Clinton Foundation also defrauded the National Archivist by making demonstrably
false representations in a binding legal agreement.
For example, there is no evidence the IRS provided final approval to the Clinton Foundation
to �fight HIV/AIDS internationally� as a tax-exempt purpose by Nov. 18, 2004, the
date the presidential archive was officially donated.
That Nov. 18, 2004, agreement is nowhere to be found today on the Clinton Foundation website
and in public filings despite the charity�s more than 13 years of widespread solicitation
across state and national boundaries using telephones, mail, and the internet.
The next major investigation started in December 2009 when the French government launched a
detailed look into UNITAID, a multilateral international organization � primarily funded
by France � that has sent more than $650 million to arms of the Clinton Foundation
engaged, at least in theory, in fighting HIV and AIDS.
Reports concerning this investigation, written in French and published in 2010 and 2011,
show that French government authorities, like their U.S. counterparts, missed the heart
of the problem posed by the Clinton Foundation.
The foundation, by its own description, started soliciting funding for its fight against HIV
and AIDS early in 2002, though its authorized charitable status didn�t change until March
2004, after the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative Inc. was officially recognized
on March 24, 2004, in Arkansas.
Applications made to the IRS, to various states and to foreign governments for tax exemption
and solicitation rights to pursue this radically different mission, are not available on the
central portal operated by the Clinton Foundation, nor forthcoming, yet, from the governments
concerned.
Federal tax filings for this entity for the partial year in 2004 and for 2005 aren�t
available on the Clinton Foundation website, perhaps because they show substantial activities
that seem to fall far outside tax-exempt purposes approved by the IRS.
In addition, these and other tax filings fail to explain payments to members of the Clinton
family for services received and for reimbursement of expenses by donors to the Clinton Foundation.
Even though there is no public record that the Clinton Foundation ever was authorized
to control a supposed charity �fighting HIV/AIDS internationally,� the Clinton Foundation
HIV/AIDS Initiative Inc. was supposedly liquidated as of Dec. 31, 2005, with all of its worldwide
activities and obligations supposedly taken over by the parent foundation.
There is no evidence in the public domain that the merger was lawfully completed in
each U.S. state and foreign country in which either entity operated.
From 2006 through 2009, the Clinton Foundation solicited funds and received a majority of
its growing revenues, in theory, to fight HIV and AIDS internationally.
Required audits were not prepared to strict U.S. requirements.
Moreover, versions of these audits on the Clinton Foundation website exclude key �combining�
statements that show for 2007 through 2009 just how substantial HIV- and AIDS-specific
financial amounts are compared to the combined total.
The Clinton Foundation attempted to reorganize in 2009, but available public filings could
place multiple individuals in significant jeopardy.
For example, claims made to the IRS in applications for federal tax exemption on Form 1023, under
penalties of perjury, are false and materially misleading concerning numerous entities created
after Sept. 4, 2009, to carry on unauthorized activities in which the Clinton Foundation
had been engaged starting in 2002.
To get to the heart of the vexing problems that allowed the largest unprosecuted charity
frauds ever attempted to flourish from January 2001 forward, one must ask many questions
of central figures in federal, state and foreign governments.
How did Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, while U.S. attorney in Maryland, miss the
fact that the Clinton Foundation was promoting use of potentially adulterated HIV and AIDS
drugs from October 2003 forward, even as he took until May 2013 to help win a $500 million
set of penalties against the Indian manufacturer of the generic drugs?
Why was an African-American selected for prosecution during her re-election campaign in 2016 when
Hillary Clinton was left unscathed despite the many years of questionable charitable
activities by the Clinton Foundation?
How did Rosenstein miss obvious errors in the Clinton Foundation tax filings for 2010
(originally submitted in 2011 with amended versions submitted in 2015) concerning a $37.1
million donation to the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund at a P.O.
Box address in Baltimore, Maryland, that was never declared, as required, in key states
like New York?
Why did Rosenstein (and many other officials, including New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman),
fail to require Laureate Education and the Clinton Foundation to explain how they organized
the �Clinton Global Initiative University� and why the Clinton Foundation tax filings
for 2010 through 2016 don�t explain what Bill Clinton did for the $17.6 million he
was paid as part-time chancellor while he held key roles at the Clinton Foundation?
Former Congresswoman Corrine Brown, a Florida Democrat, reports to jail for a five-year
term in federal prison following her conviction of being part of an $800,000 charity fraud.
Why was this African-American selected for prosecution during her re-election campaign
in 2016 when Hillary Clinton was left unscathed despite the many years of questionable charitable
activities by the Clinton Foundation?
Former presidents in either the Democratic or Republican parties are not above the law.
Now it�s up to President Donald Trump to make this fact abundantly clear.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét