Chủ Nhật, 11 tháng 2, 2018

Waching daily Feb 11 2018

(TV broadcast playing off mic)

- Curling, sport of kings.

Mornin', Trainiacs.

As I start watching the Olympics

through all of my waking hours

over the next couple of weeks,

I have been thinking about the differences

in triathlon between ITU Olympic track

pro triathletes and Ironman pro triathletes,

and over the last two, three, four, five months,

as I've started getting to know

a lot of these pro triathletes,

I've heard a lot of the differences

between the two different tracks in prize money,

approach, training, enjoyment,

the business side of it, all that stuff.

Let's discuss that today, shall we?

Now, there are a quite a number of differences

between ITU sprint and Olympic distance racing,

and Ironman racing, obviously, totally different sport.

Now for starters, obviously, the distances are different

in ITU/WTS racing, you're racing sprints

and Olympics distance races.

In world Triathlon corporation, the Ironman brand races

or the Ironman distance races, you're racing half Ironman,

full Ironman, and occasionally ITU long course.

And what this results in, as athletes tend to move

from short course when they're young

and they're twitchy-fast, and they haven't yet peaked

for that endurance age of like early to mid '30s,

they start switching from a race

that is speed and twitchy-fast focused

to more of a strength focused race.

They have to start worrying about how strong their body is

because it needs to hold up for hours and hours of pounding

and it's less of that absolute top-end speed.

The short course races are draft legal as well,

whereas the long course, non-drafting,

so what this results in is the short course races

tend to be more focused on having a good swim

so you can get out of the swim in the front pack

and you don't have to use the bike to bridge up

to the front pack, burning a lot of matches,

and you hopefully come out in that front pack

off the bike, and then it's essentially a run race.

In the short course distance racing,

if you have the fastest run,

odds are good you're going to be close to winning,

whereas with long course racing, its much more focused

on the bike and the run and not necessarily the swim.

Nutrition really not at all a focus

for short course athletes.

Sarah True says that she basically might take one gel

coming into the run, and a little bit of electrolytes,

but barely even thinks about it to the point

that when she started doing long course distance racing,

she had to remind herself to actually eat.

Now with regards to funding,

this a really really big difference.

In ITU short course racing, you're on an Olympic track.

You are going towards racing on the blue carpets

and bringing home Olympic gold for your country,

so this means that you're often getting

government funding when you're a short course athlete

whereas with Ironman, you're essentially on your own.

You are like a sole proprietor or a one person corporation

of your own little business.

That, for income, has some benefits

that we'll talk about later.

Now as far as race choices are concerned,

the short course distance races, it's a series.

You're limited to a series of races

and if you don't go to those races,

you ain't racing ITU or TWS series races.

You out, son.

But with long course, you've got Ironman,

you've got Challenge, you've got multiple Ironman options

every single week, so what this results in is,

you don't have the same athletes competing

week after week after week

against each other with the same tactics,

knowing essentially what the outcome is going to be.

In long course distance racing, you have different fields

every single week, and apparently this leads to

a little bit less camaraderie amongst the pros

because your competitors are constantly changing.

Now let's talk prize money.

At the tippy-top of the prize winnings

in short course racing, the dollar figures are higher.

However, with long course racing,

the prize money for winning tends to be lower,

but the prize money per athlete goes a lot further

down the list, so there are more people

that are cashing checks.

By looking at the pro prize money earnings every single year

we see that it's essentially a wash,

that there is no clear delineation

between short course athletes or long course athletes

making more than one or the other, but I believe

that for the top athletes out there, and I'll say

that if you are an elite ITU short course athlete,

odds are really good that when you step into

long course racing, you're gonna be

one of the top long course racers around.

Think Daniela Ryf, think Javier Gomez,

think Alaister Brownlee, think Sarah True.

In short course distance racing,

you're limited because of government arrangements,

because of sponsorship rights to who you can take on

as a sponsor, appearances that you can make,

whereas with long course racing,

you're on your own, you can do whatever you want,

and I think that for those elite athletes

that can garner sponsorship dollars,

that because you have more options in long course racing

with what you can and can't do,

you're essentially your own business

and from what I've kind of gathered,

that provides a lot more financial benefit

when you start looking at the overall

where athletes are getting their income at the pro levels.

And essentially, that's the gist of it,

that with short course racing,

you are not just racing for yourself,

you're racing for your country,

and it's more of a community

because it's this small, little, isolated, ecosystem

of development, whereas with long course racing,

you're your own brand, son.

Take it or leave it, do what you want, have at it.

Thank you for watching.

If you aren't yet subscribed,

hit that subscribe button below,

and if you don't want to miss

any of the daily triathlon videos that we put out,

hit the notification bell.

If you are already subscribed, hit up in the comments below

with your favorite ITU turned long course athlete.

Now, Olympics for two weeks.

Later, Trainiacs.

For more infomation >> ITU PRO TRIATHLETES VS Ironman Pro Triathlon: PRIZE MONEY, Training, Sponsorship - Duration: 6:37.

-------------------------------------------

[Português \ Español] What The Duck - The Series - Episódio 12 - Duration: 38:56.

For more infomation >> [Português \ Español] What The Duck - The Series - Episódio 12 - Duration: 38:56.

-------------------------------------------

The Multidimensional Self The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond - Duration: 23:47.

The Multidimensional Self The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond

by Jeff Street,

Whether you know it or not, you are a multidimensional being of staggering proportions. You are more

than meets the eye, much more � more than your body, more than your soul, in fact, you

are an integral part of the Universe. You are part of the composite consciousness that

is the Universe and beyond! You are present on many levels of reality simultaneously and

more powerful than you have ever imagined. Are you ready to expand your concept of selfhood

to include higher selves, other/parallel selves, and probable selves? If so then, let�s dive

in!

Most of us are familiar with the idea of the soul � the conception that our bodies are

transient physical vessels for an eternal energetic aspect of our consciousness, which

is our true essence. Conventional science dismisses this idea, and so do many people.

Yet, there are plenty of people that feel the presence of something greater within themselves

and you are probably one of them since you were attracted to this material. And as the

great shift in the consciousness of humanity accelerates, more and more people are feeling

this presence and connecting with it.

If we take the existence of some sort of higher aspect of self as a given, the next question

becomes; is our current idea of the soul accurate and complete? There are a growing number of

sources that are saying that it is not, that it is overly simplistic, in fact, almost one-dimensional

when compared to the new higher fidelity models being suggested.

Some schools of thought subscribe to the very simple model shown below.

The Multidimensional Self: The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond

This model portrays just two entities; Source/God and Souls (potentially connected to bodies).

Its most notable element is that the soul is seen as created by, but separate from the

creator. This representation is very simple and easy to understand but it is a gross oversimplification,

and the idea that we are separate from Source/God is, well, just plain wrong. Luckily, fewer

and fewer people are subscribing to this particular model.

Another school of thought offers a somewhat more sophisticated model as shown below.

The Multidimensional Self: The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond

It considers the Soul a PART OF a wider/higher entity referred to as the Over-Soul, which

in turn, is part of the all-encompassing Source/God entity. This model is on the right track and

hits upon a couple of key elements; we are multi-layered beings, and every layer is PART

OF (and within) each successive layer and all are part of, and within, the one all-encompassing

being that we call Source/God. Yet even this model is an oversimplification.

A word of warning here; when you see the term �being�, think �sentient energetic entity�

not �physical being�. Most of us have a tendency to personify the concept of �beingness�,

but this is a mistake. The essence of all beingness is something non-physical and that�s

why I will often use the term �entity� instead, because it avoids this trap.

While the models presented certainly do reflect some aspects of the deeper reality, it is

my contention that they are just gross approximations. In the remainder of this article, I will present

a more sophisticated model that is a synthesis of ideas from a number of different sources

and expands greatly beyond the models mentioned above. It suggests that we are multidimensional

entities present on many levels of �reality� simultaneously and more powerful than we have

been led to believe or have ever imagined. Only a small portion of your total beingness

is present in the physical body that you may have erroneously assumed was all of you. The

you that you identify as you is a part of a much bigger entity, which is ultimately

also just a small part of the ultimate entity that is �all that is� � referred to

through the ages by many names; Source, Infinite Creator, God, etc.

You are a multidimensional being of staggering proportions and in your quest to know yourself,

and the nature of your existence, you have employed massive parallelism.

Higher Selves So what exactly is a soul and what is its

relationship to what some call �God� and others call �Source Consciousness�?

If you haven�t heard the term �source consciousness� before then this may come

as a shock � the universe is conscious in its very fabric. The Universe is not at all

what it appears from our very limited perspective. We exist inside of something resembling a

great cosmic mind, often referred to as �cosmic/universal consciousness�.

As the term �source consciousness� suggests, all consciousness is derived from the universal

field of consciousness. The consciousness of each and every one of us is an individualized

thread of the universal consciousness. This is what your �soul� is � it is a thread

of universal consciousness with an associated repository of experiential information (local

memory), and derivative ideas, all somehow encoded as a pattern of energy. Our soul is

sentient energy as is the entire universe.

This idea is echoed by the modern day mystic and spiritual teacher Story Waters in his

statement below that he made in his One Self Teachings.

There is only One Consciousness in all existence. The consciousness that I know myself as is

the same consciousness you know yourself as.

Source consciousness is the intelligence that is/created our Universe, and it INDIRECTLY

created all our souls. One of the fundamental capabilities of consciousness is the ability

to subdivide itself � to create smaller individualized copies of itself within itself.

Source used this mechanism to create the first level of sub-threads of its consciousness,

what in effect could be thought of as sub-selves. It did this to explore and experience many-ness,

rather than oneness, but more importantly, as a strategy to accelerate the exploration

of itself and existence � to accelerate its evolution.

The mechanism that Source used to accomplish subdivision and individuation of its consciousness

was primarily that of lowering the frequency of portions of its energies, stepping them

down into the lower frequency bands of the energetic field. This is part of the reason

why subdivisions of consciousness operate somewhat independently of, yet are inherently

part of and connected to, the �higher� consciousness that spawned them � they are

simply portions of the parent sentient energies at a significantly lower frequential level.

The subdivisions of consciousness that Source created within itself, in a very real sense,

can be considered its sub-selves. And here is the really cool part, anything that a sub-self

experiences is also experienced by its parent/higher-self and thus forms the basis for an evolutionary

strategy � massively parallel experiences!

The process of subdivision of consciousness is a general capability and can and has been

repeated by the sub-selves at each level of consciousness, and for the same reasons � to

accelerate their evolution, and thereby contributing to Sources evolution.

Consciousness is like a multi-level branching structure. If we use a tree analogy, then

source consciousness would be the tree trunk. The tree trunk then divides into many large

branches, which keep dividing into smaller and smaller branches until we get to twigs

with a leaf attached to the end of each.

The Multidimensional Self: The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond

In this model we could think of the �leaves� as physical bodies and then as you move from

the leaf towards the trunk we�d encounter the soul level, and then the over-soul level,

and then a number of additional levels till we reached the tree trunk coming out of the

ground, the Source level. Note that even though the diagram above shows seven levels it�s

unclear how many levels there really are, or whether all branches have to have the same

number of divisions/levels. The only thing that�s for sure is that there are more than

three levels, probably many more. A number of sources indicate that there is a level

above the Over-Soul that has been referred to as �Soul Group�. Below is a diagram

illustrating the divisional structure of universal consciousness.

The Multidimensional Self: The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond

According to some sources there are 2,135 Soul Groups participating in the Earth experience

right now (who knows how many exist within Source in total, probably many more). Each

Soul Group entity is able to subdivide itself into (create) up to 144,000 over-souls, and

each over-soul is able to create up to 12 souls, and each soul up to 12 soul-extensions.

A Soul-Extension is just another subdivision of consciousness which allows connection to

physical vehicles (bodies) in the very lowest frequency bands. The consciousness that connects

to a body to �drive� it has to be within a certain �distance� frequentailly to

achieve the connection. If you do the math this leads to potentially 44 billion incarnate

entities on Earth.

An over-soul creates one or more souls for the purpose of connecting to physical bodies

in the physical planes of existence � the lower frequency bands of the Universe. A physical

body is simply a vehicle that the soul uses to have physical experiences. Physical life

provides unique and highly formative experiences that are much sought after by a wide variety

of non-physical beings. Physical experience, while challenging, is a spiritual evolution

fast track and therefore highly coveted.

The 12�12 subdivisional structure of the Over-Soul allows each over-soul to have up

to 144 sub-selves that each can bind to physical bodies for 144 parallel physical lives. And

of course, one of these 144 sub-selves and its body is YOU!

The Higher Self, The True Self Amongst those that embrace that they have

a soul, many are still overly identified with their body as their identity. Even those that

embrace the soul as their true identity may be missing a deeper appreciation of the true

scope of their wider/higher self. Despite the fact that some use the term �Higher-Self�

as a synonym for the �Over-Soul� I think it�s better used to refer to all the levels

of self all the way up to, and including, Source. The figure below illustrates this

idea.

The Multidimensional Self: The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond

As the figure illustrates, the chain of consciousness that spawned your soul � your over-soul,

soul-group, and every level all the way to source � all could be considered your higher-self.

But your over-soul is the level of your composite self that has direct responsibility for your

soul�s existence and interest in the quality of your experiences, that�s why the over-soul

is often thought of as your higher-self. But you truly are a part of every level in the

chain of your composite consciousness and can potentially communicate with and draw

information, knowledge, and guidance from any level of your multidimensional/composite

self.

Your body, and in a sense, even your soul, where created as a transient sentient entity

to serve as an experiential and evolutionary vehicle for your over-soul. So in a very real

sense, you could consider the over-soul that spawned your soul as your TRUE SELF!

And your Over-Soul is an immensely wise and powerful being that is always trying to encourage

you to create the best experiences for yourself and to become the highest vision of yourself.

Why? because you are part of it, and it is experiencing through you!

At this point you might be wondering, �If this is true, why don�t I know it and feel

it?� This is a very good question.

When your soul incarnates (connects to a physical vehicle) it loses its memory of its greater

existence. The �veil of forgetting� is intentional, it makes the earth game a fully

immersive and truly formative experience. The game of life would not be the same if

you knew it was just a game.

We also lose a lot of the fidelity of our connection to our higher-self (over-soul and

source). This is an unavoidable consequence of incarnating into the lower frequency planes

of existence � the physical planes. Our earthly level of consciousness is at a frequency

so much lower than that of our higher-self that any stream of information coming down

is subject to a large reduction of fidelity due to the frequency step down required. Yet

we could still have a very good connection with our higher-self if it wasn�t for one

thing � our out-of-control ego.

The constant chatter of the ego and analytical mind creates so much mental noise that we

can�t hear the inner guiding voice of our higher-self. Essentially the signal to noise

ratio is so low that the information coming from our higher-self gets drowned out. Hence,

most people on Earth have almost totally lost connection with their higher-self and have

completely forgotten what they really are.

What does it take to reestablish a clear connection to your higher-self? For one thing, it takes

a clear and quiet mind. One must quell the constant chatter of the analytical and egoic

mind and the fear and worry that dominates it. Another thing that helps is to reduce

our busyness � the constant distractions of our hectic daily lives don�t leave much

space for the presence of the higher-self. Making more time for solitude and meditation

is a good start.

As poor as most people�s connection to their higher self is, you�ve never really completely

lost your connection to the other parts of your multidimensional self. Without realizing

it, you�ve had communications between the different layers of your multidimensional

self, as well as �other� higher dimensional beings, particularly in childhood when you

were much more open and receptive. Since then you�ve rejected, ignored, and forgotten

most of these �Interdimensional� experiences, simply because you didn�t understand what

they were and dismissed them as dreams, over-active imagination, hallucinations, etc.

If you�d like to explore the topic of improving your connection to higher levels of you then

check out my blog article Improving Your Connection To The Divine.

Even thou the loss of connection with our higher-self could be seen as �bad� it

actually serves one of the reasons why we devised the earth game in the first place

� to experience separation and to see what it could teach us � separation from the

source of our beingness, separation from the knowing that we are all parts of one great

being and interconnected and interdependent.

With training, you can learn how to move your locus of consciousness to any level of your

wider/higher-self � your soul, over-soul, even Source, and perceive from that higher

perspective. In fact, you can move your locus of consciousness to anywhere in the infinite

matrix that is the conceptual/information space of the universal field of consciousness.

More on this in future articles, follow the blog to stay tuned!

Other Selves, Parallel Selves, and Many Lives The Multidimensional Self: The Soul, OverSoul,

And Beyond

From the perspective of your Over-Soul (the higher/wider you), all the souls that it created,

and their extensions that are connected to physical bodies, could be considered your

�other selves�.

By some accounts, this can be up to 144 PARALLEL incarnations, and regardless of whether that

exact number is correct, we can safely say that the higher you is experiencing MANY LIVES

in parallel. And since at the end of a life the sentient energy that was connected to

a body can be reused with another body, your Over-Soul has experienced far more incarnations

than this, perhaps thousands! This is why your Over-Soul is so wise, it�s the sum

of all the wisdom gleaned from a vast amount of experiences.

Your many incarnations can be anywhere in the physical Universe � any planet; any

galaxy; any time period � past, present, or future (our conception of time is wrong,

time is an illusion); and in any one of the planes of physical reality.

But since you�re here having an Earth experience it is very likely that many of the other lives

the higher you is having are also here on Earth, probably in other time periods. The

Earth reality system provides challenging yet highly formative experiences that are

appropriate for fairly advanced beings, so if you are currently engaged here, then it

is likely that most of your other selves are here as well because anything less would be

boring.

The diagram below visually illustrates all the parallel incarnations associated with

a given over-soul.

The Multidimensional Self: The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond

Past and Future Lives Using a technique known as �Past Life Regression�

you can actually visit or �see� your other lives � by �see� I mean �have and

inner experience of�. This is done by going into a trance state (via hypnosis or deep

relaxation) and then being guided, by suggestion or your own intent, to visit the experiences

of your �other selves�, your �other lives�. In the trance state, the earthly

mind is quieted, and one can perceive from the vantage point of any level of ones higher-self

and sense the experiences of any of their parallel lives. All these experiences are

recorded in the energy/information field of your higher-self and are accessible if you

center the focus of your consciousness in one of the levels of your higher-self. Depending

on the level you may �see� the lives experienced by your soul, or your over-soul, or perhaps

even higher levels of yourself.

The term �Past Life Regression� is a bit of a misnomer since your other lives are all

happening simultaneously and can be in any time period; past or future. If visiting a

future life seems illogical or impossible to you then you might want to check out my

article on The Illusion of Time. In the many thousands of regressions that have been done

many have reported �seeing� portions of lives that were clearly in the future rather

than in the past. Most people focus on exploring their �past lives� because, with our erroneous

conception of linear time, we think that the past is �recorded� (and therefore potentially

can be explored) but the future hasn�t happened yet (so isn�t recorded and can�t be visited).

There are also many people who have reported experiences from what could be called the

�inter-life� period, the time between physical earth lives. A common report from

these experiences is that our many lives are all, somehow, happening at once. Yet other

people have reported an apparent sequential process of coming out of one life, reviewing

it, planning, and then starting the next � which seems to contradict �all at once�. This

is likely due to the fact that non-linear concepts are very hard for our earthly minds

to understand and express so we will often express them linearly.

To dive deeper into the topic of past life regression I recommend the following books;

Past Life Regression: Discover Your Hidden Past Life Memories and Past Lives, Future

Lives Revealed.

Probable Selves, Parallel Selves, and Many Life Paths

Another way that your higher-self accelerates its evolution through the use of parallelism

is to experience all possible/probable life paths!

Have you ever wondered what would have happened if you had made a different choice at a critical

juncture in your life? Well, so did your soul, but instead of just wondering it divides its

consciousness yet again, creating a sub-thread of its consciousness to follow and experience

each alternate life path. At every decision point of any significance, one portion of

your souls sentience follows branch A, and another follows branch B. Your soul is experiencing

all possible/probable life paths in parallel! The YOU that you think of as you is simply

a sub-thread of your soul that is experiencing one particular branch of the life path decision

tree. Your soul (and over-soul) are then integrating all those threads of experience and getting

wiser very rapidly because of it.

At every significant decision point on a life path the path branches. A decision tree represents

all possible paths. All of these are experienced by your soul. This mechanism creates a massively

parallel experience which maximizes the evolutionary potential for the soul, for the over-soul,

and for Source � since all experiences are experienced by your higher consciousness,

they trickle up.

The soul threads that follow each of the possible paths of experience could in a sense, be called

�Probable Selves�. Because there is one for each possible/probable life path. These

probable selves are all very real and so are all the alternate experiences they are having

� and it is all being accumulated by your higher levels of self! Imagine how much one

could learn by experiencing every possible alternative life path, and all their outcomes!

You would learn and grow very fast! That�s the reason why we designed the process this

way!

The Highest Self, The One Self Life has everything to do with you. But with

Big You, not with Little You; with Universal You, not with Local You. There is only One

of us. � Neale Donald Walsch, Conversations with

God, Book 1

Once you understand and embrace the multidimensional nature of your beingness, your perspective

will broaden greatly. You may begin to see yourself not as the body and the ego that�s

running around here on Earth but as your true essence � your eternal higher-self. You

might even embrace, that in a very real sense, your �highest self� is source consciousness!

I am the eternal state of being within each and every one of you.

� Source Consciousness

And an even greater realization may come over you. The realization that since the consciousness

of all entities/beings are ultimately threads of source consciousness, and hence we are

all parts of the one universal consciousness, that in a very real sense, there is only �One

Self�.

All levels of consciousness and all focal points of consciousness/beingness are ultimately

within, and integral parts of, source consciousness � the one being. And this one being is your

highest self, so in a sense, all beings could be considered �yourself�. This is why

it makes sense to treat all beings with the utmost respect, care, encouragement, etc � because

it�s all you!

Here�s a message from our Source that reinforces what I�ve been saying here � �I am the

eternal state of being within each and every one of you. I am you, you are me, we are one.�

For more infomation >> The Multidimensional Self The Soul, OverSoul, And Beyond - Duration: 23:47.

-------------------------------------------

Street Photography - Why do some photos get so excited? [sub EN] - Duration: 7:35.

Did you get a lot of money for a TV interview?

Yes...

Hostility

Hostility

Strong Hostility

shame....shame...and shame

disdain

These are universal expressions

People express expressions in the same way that they are housewives....

...or terrorists

The truth is written on our face

Hi friends, welcome to this new appointment with Street Photography Scool

Today we opened the video with a clip taken from the television series Lie To Me

because today we want to talk about emotions

I was particularly struck by the last sentence of the clip in which the protagonist says:

"The truth is written on our face"

This, if you think about it, is what happens in street photography

when we freeze the emotions written on the faces of the subjects with a photo

That phrase in the clip made me think a lot about the importance of street photography, as it is made up of authentic emotions

Emotions can not be replicated in a photographic studio

If you think about it, a kiss caught in the metro

has an emotional charge characterized by the environment, the circumstances, the authenticity of the emotions of the subjects

Furthermore, knowing that the situation has really happened makes it even more exciting

So, is it enough just to photograph people on the street to make an exciting photo, full of meaning and feeling?

The answer is "no", because it is not enough to take a picture of strangers

but there are some photos that excite in particular

they touch something inside of us and even looking at them 100 times they always thrill us

So why do we particularly love some photos?

Why do they trigger certain emotions within us?

I tried to analyze a photo that struck me a lot and generated great emotions inside me

I tried to understand why this photo and not another, aroused certain feelings in me

Obviously it is said that a photo is exciting regardless

a picture is exciting for those who look at it

so this picture, for me, means a lot, just like someone else does not mean anything ... and vice versa

For educational purposes I tried to understand what are the three elements that make an exciting photo

The photo of which I spoke to you is this of Alex Muller

the first reason that makes an exciting photo is to see the subject experiencing an authentic feeling

the same feeling is also felt by us

it is clear to see this gentleman being happy in a certain situation and at a certain moment

as a result we experience happiness for that person we are observing

maybe we feel tenderness for his age

or for the expressions of his face

This may already be a first reason why a photo can excite us

The other reason is that we identify with the subject and think about our life

For example: if you are a parent who has sons who live far away and you see very little

whenever they call you, you experience great happiness, a great emotion

you are happy that they are well, that they love you, that they have thought of you

So only those who are in a similar situation can identify with the subject of the photo

and try a strong emotion looking at the picture

Third reason: it is the situation on the whole that can generate a great emotion

because it makes us think of a similar situation that we have already experienced

For example in this case the general situation is the phone call

so if we recently received a phone call that gave us good news, like the news of a new job, or positive news from our friends

the phone call of the picture makes us unconsciously happy for what we have received

Finally, think again about the initial clip. There, much importance is given to the signs of the body

We understand that in street photos they are very present and are authentic gestures generated by a particular situation

For example, returning to the picture of the gentleman on the phone

we see that there are many elements that further load the image, exalting more the emotion that the subject is feeling

look at your hand

look at the folds of the eyes

look at the smile, the mouth ...

they are all elements that amplify the emotion of the subject

So, we analyzed what can characterize the emotion in a photo

Before concluding the video, I would like to thank you for continuing to follow this channel which has now surpassed 4000 followers

It means there is a lot of interest in Street Level Photography photos

but also perhaps for these tutorials

Let me know if these videos interest you and if you want them to continue producing them

write in the comments what you think about the emotions in the photos, which are in your opinion the most important elements that we have not analyzed in this video

For now it's all, I wait for you at the next video. Good light and good street. Bye

For more infomation >> Street Photography - Why do some photos get so excited? [sub EN] - Duration: 7:35.

-------------------------------------------

Avengers [Comic Dub] - The Great Debate - Duration: 0:16.

Like I always say: Five. Guys. Best burgers in New York.

Until they build an In and Out.

Hawkeye, do not blaspheme my cheeseburger church.

Say what you want, but nothing compares to the Whataburger Patty Melt.

[Together] SHUT UP, DEADPOOL!

-or Shake Shack, just sayin'!

For more infomation >> Avengers [Comic Dub] - The Great Debate - Duration: 0:16.

-------------------------------------------

Oscars' Shots - "Call Me by Your Name" - Duration: 3:17.

The last year's Oscars was an expression of a certain trend.

The best example was "Moonlight" (2017, dir. Barry Jenkins),

the movie that uses simple schemes that are uplifted in an exaggerated artistic form,

but at the same time creating an ambiguous, very complex portrait of an African-American, homosexual,

but also - above all - a torn, lost man.

Cinema about minorities finally ceases to emphasize the singularity of groups,

and starts to tell stories through universal experiences.

In this way it humanizes this gay guy or black person, treating them as full-fledged people.

In "Call Me by Your Name" (2017) Luca Guadagnino managed to capture the volatility of adolescence

and the sensuality of the first love elation, in the story of Elio (Timothée Chalamet),

who is just getting to know his own sexuality.

The director takes us back to 1980s Italy.

The boy spends his holidays with his parents in a beautiful, 17th-century villa surrounded by nature.

He spends his days on reading, playing piano and having fun with collegues,

during which he makes a brief flirtation with his friend, Marzia.

This peaceful rest for Elio interrupts appearance in the homestead of an American scholarship holder

Oliver (Armie Hammer), who came to work on his PhD degree with boy's father.

The presence of young, beautiful, intelligent young man initially iritates Elio,

but with a time, it starts to evolve into fascination, and finally in the first real youthful love.

Guadagnino managed to describe this elusive ephemeral nature of very intense feelings,

which find their highlight in a wonderfully filmed, full of vivid colors

surrounding nature, culture and nostalgic soundtrack.

Somewhere above all this is the spirit of unforgettable movies of Luchino Visconti.

Not only due to modernist narration, not only because of literature fascination.

But also through the huge nostalgia for losing something very important.

Elio and Oliver cannot be completely honest with each other.

Of course, the social norms of the time, which don't give them a chance for a common future, also play their role.

More important, however, is the fact of the universal ephemerality of feelings,

which is simply difficult to precisely describe.

The characters try to find a different way of expressing them, they try to show them between words.

This is also reflected in the practice of calling themselves by the name of the lover,

so wonderfully summarized in the title of the film.

Thanks to all that "Call Me by Your Name" creates a coherent, subtle image of youthful elations.

Elations, which nostalgia in some way somehow affects us all.

- Muscles are firm. Not a straight body in these stautes. They're all curved.

Sometimes impossibly curved, and so nonchalant.

Hence their ageless ambiguity, as if they're daring you to desire.

For more infomation >> Oscars' Shots - "Call Me by Your Name" - Duration: 3:17.

-------------------------------------------

Alanyaspor 1 2 Konyaspor geniş maç özeti 11.02.2018 - Duration: 1:38.

For more infomation >> Alanyaspor 1 2 Konyaspor geniş maç özeti 11.02.2018 - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

Could Mount Everest Be Destroyed? - Duration: 3:38.

Hello and welcome back to Life's Biggest Questions, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey.

Ever since Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay scaled the great mountain in 1953,

Mount Everest has been the great white whale of mountaineering.

Its beauty eclipsed only by its danger, it would be a terribly pity if it no longer existed.

Certain conditions are casting some doubt on the future of the mountain, but could it

ever be destroyed?

Let's explore.

If you want more What If videos, check out our "Biggest What Ifs" playlist on the

channel.

Now get ready, it's time to ask the question: Could Mt. Everest be Destroyed?

It should be pointed out that Mt. Everest is not a lone mountain, but is just one particularly

impressive peak that's part of the Himalayan mountain range.

For what it's worth, this video will be discussing the destruction of the Everest

peak, and not the rest of the range.

However, as you'll later see, this is something of a moot point.

One potential source of its destruction is an Earthquake.

Some posit that an earthquake of sufficient magnitude could cause the peak to collapse.

It was recently discovered that an important part of the mountain, known as the Hillary

Step, named after Sir Edmund Hillary, had collapsed.

This was largely viewed as the final obstacle on the Mount Everest climb, and its destruction

was very disappointing to mountaineers around the world.

It's believed that this may have occurred during the 2015 Earthquake in Nepal.

However, does the loss of this 12 metre high outcrop spell the end of the 9000 metre tall

mountain?

Not necessarily.

There's little evidence that an earthquake could cause a mountain to be destroyed; on

the contrary, earthquakes are what brought about many mountains in the first place.

It's true that they can cause small portions to come apart, and create landslides, but

even if this process COULD destroy the mountain, it would take a very, very long time to do

so.

But that isn't the only natural event that could negatively affect the mountain; many

scientists believe that climate change could have some serious effects.

As temperatures increase, Mount Everest is becoming increasingly dangerous to climb.

Rising temperatures could cause the glacial lakes of Everest to burst, which would flood

the surrounding area, endangering the 40 thousand Sherpas that live at the bottom of the mountain.

Climate scientists estimate that 80% of the glaciers covering the Himalayas could be gone

within 30 years, something that could greatly increase the danger to those attempting to

scale the mountain.

So while it may not be physically destroyed, it may be metaphorically destroyed if it can

no longer be accessed in the future due to dangerous conditions.

However, let's imagine that, for some reason, we INTENDED to destroy the mountain.

I can't imagine why this would occur, but let's set the reasoning aside for now.

Would it be possible to destroy it on purpose?

The answer is a resounding yes.

While the amount of explosives is difficult to determine, having a large number of explosions,

or a number of nuclear detonations, could be enough to wipe the mountain off the earth.

You likely wouldn't even need to blow up the whole thing; enough explosions at the

base could cause the rest of the mountain to collapse under its own weight.

However, there doesn't seem to be a good reason to do so.

One possibility is if the melting glaciers began to endanger the nearby people, but an

exploding mountain wouldn't exactly be a preferable danger.

And now we return to our question: Could Mount Everest be Destroyed?

Well, while climate change does seem to have detrimental effects on the mountain, these

effects are more likely to harm those climbing it or those nearby, rather than endangering

the mountain itself.

If it will be destroyed, it likely won't happen by natural means.

If we WANTED to destroy it for whatever reason, we likely could do it with enough explosives.

However, there's no real reason to do this, and it would put the lives of those in the

surrounding area at risk.

Thank you for watching Life's Biggest Questions, I hope this was interesting and informative,

and maybe even inspired you to look into it further on your own.

If you liked this video, please thumbs up and subscribe to the channel down below.

While you're down there, let me know your favourite hobby.

And if it's mountaineering, let me know your thoughts on the Everest situation!

Until next time, I'm Ron McKenzie-Lefurgey with Life's Biggest Questions, wishing you

the best of luck, on your quest for answers.

For more infomation >> Could Mount Everest Be Destroyed? - Duration: 3:38.

-------------------------------------------

Valentine Halal or Haram in Islam Nauman Ali khan 2018 - Duration: 11:34.

Valentine Halal or Haram in Islam Nauman Ali khan 2018 Nauman Ali Khan discussion about Haya and valentine day Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcudzsYK8CSZNVw06s9BDEQ?sub_confirmation=1 Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/DEEN-LIFE-700798213337429/ Google+: https://plus.google.com/115096648832473252773 YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcudzsYK8CSZNVw06s9BDEQ #Subscribe4

Valentine Halal or Haram in Islam Nauman Ali khan 2018

Valentine Halal or Haram in Islam Nauman Ali khan 2018

For more infomation >> Valentine Halal or Haram in Islam Nauman Ali khan 2018 - Duration: 11:34.

-------------------------------------------

REPORT President Trump Proposing 'Biggest Civil Service Change' - Duration: 2:53.

REPORT President Trump Proposing �Biggest Civil Service Change� In A Generation

For decades, Donald Trump has said the U.S. government should be operated like a business.

Now President Trump is seeking to implement the �biggest civil service change,� in

a generation.

USA Today reports:

President Trump will seek to �hire the best and fire the worst� federal government employees

under the most ambitious proposal to overhaul the civil service in 40 years, officials said.

[�]

Trump is using the VA Accountability Act, which gave the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

greater authority to fire and discipline workers, as a model.

The White House says that law has resulted in the dismissal of 1,470 employees, the suspension

of 443, demotions for 83 others last year.

Under the current system, federal employees get a review every one to three years.

Employees whose performance is �fully successful� � as 99.7% are � get a within-grade �step�

increase in addition to annual cost-of-living increases.

Trump�s plan would stretch out the amount of time it takes to go from step 1 to step

10 from 18 years to 27 years, saving $10 billion over the next decade, officials said.

That money would then go to high-performing employees either as merit raises or one-time

bonuses.

During his State of the Union address last week, President Trump teased plans for an

overhaul, stating, �Tonight, I call on Congress to empower every Cabinet Secretary with the

authority to reward good workers and to remove federal employees who undermine the public

trust or fail the American people.�

Rumblings about a shakeup began before President Trump�s address.

Last month, Robert Shea, a former White House Office of Management and Budget official hinted

to Bloomberg Law that, �A pretty substantial reorganization�, may occur in the near future.

Another source told the publication that, �OPM may be ready for a big shakeup.�

For more infomation >> REPORT President Trump Proposing 'Biggest Civil Service Change' - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

Bridgetown - The Story and Legacy of Portland's Bridges - Duration: 23:41.

BRIDGETOWN

INTRO There are 12 bridges that cross the Willamette

(yes, it's "will-AEM-it")-- St. Johns, Fremont, Broadway, Steel, Burnside, Morrison,

Hawthorne, Marquam, Tilikum Crossing, Ross Island, and Sellwood-- which is ten more than

connect us to Washington.

In fact, Bridgetown is widely known as one of Portland's nicknames, because of how

interconnected the city is.

Without its iconic bridges, Portland wouldn't really be Portland anymore, the city would

probably also come to a quick shutdown.

Portland's bridges, however, don't just contribute to the city culture of Portland,

each and every one of them can tell us a unique story of Portland's 20th century, as well

as that of the entire country.

Here on Bridgetown, we will explore each of Portland's most famous bridges, going north

to south, showing off how they've been built, what they offer, what they mean to Portland,

and what story they have to tell, just through how they were designed.

Welcome to Bridgetown.

[Intro sequence]

ST.

JOHNS BRIDGE

The St. Johns Bridge, connecting North Portland to upper Northwest Portland (remember, Portland

has five quadrants, not four), is the only suspension bridge in the Willamette Valley,

and is not a historic city monument, but even a national historic monument.

Built in 1931 with Gothic-inspired towers, which are the actual namesake for the nearby

Cathedral Park, as it isn't anywhere near a Cathedral.

At the time of its construction, six years before the Golden Gate Bridge, it was actually

the longest suspension bridge west of the Mississippi River.

Interestingly, though, the St. Johns Bridge, by being so far away from Portland's other

bridges, shows just how clustered most of them are downtown.

Now, back 100 years ago, neighborhoods like St. Johns were actually their own towns, founded

in the middle of the 19th century, long before Portland expanded to what it became 100 years

later.

What we now think of as downtown Portland was actually what Portland once was, the eastside

was even a separate city for a while.

In 1902, the Oregon Railway and Navigation Company (OR&N) eyed the strategically placed

St. Johns, and its ports and river access, and thus connected it with a major rail line

to the rest of the Portland area.

As the lines became electrified, they were soon also followed by streetcar systems, there

was even a line connecting Oregon and Washington.

However, the history of St. Johns' independent streak ended in 1915, when it was annexed

by the city of Portland.

It's actually because of all this that the original proposal for such an idea was met

with quite a bit of skepticism.

By then, it wasn't like the neighborhoods of St. Johns and Linnton would have had the

most political influence in Multnomah County, anymore.

At the time, the two communities were served by a ferry service carrying 1,000 cars a day.

Imagine that, a ferry service in Portland?

Construction of the bridge did finally start about a month before the Great Depression

started in 1929, but this actually meant that it provided some good work for people in the

area.

After it was completed, its dedication was also intentionally postponed so it could officially

be dedicated during the 23rd annual Rose Festival, and today, it carries a branch of US Route

30 across the river, as it finishes its westward journey toward Astoria, all the way from Philadelphia.

FREMONT BRIDGE Our next bridge is the Fremont Bridge, which

carries I-405 back across the river to catch up with I-5, and should not be confused with

the one in Seattle.

It is a tiered-arch bridge, which means that its main deck is supported by a single, giant

arch; at 382 meters, it has the longest main span of any bridge in Oregon, and at a total

length of 656 meters, is also the second-longest tiered-arch bridge in the world, behind the

800-meter Caiyuanba Bridge over the Yangtze River in Chongqing-- which is either very

impressive, or unremarkably specific, depending on how you think about it.

Its design was inspired off of the original Port Mann Bridge in Vancouver, BC, and interestingly

enough, it was also officially designated as a nesting spot for the Peregrine Falcon

in 1995.

The bridge was built in 1973, to connect the then newly built I-405 to I-5 in the north,

completing an addition to a project from Dwight Eisenhower's project to build a national

system of interstate highways, inspired partially from his service in post-WWII Germany.

Confusingly, though, it also carries a branch of US Route 30.

Unfortunately, though these highways were designed to bring the nation together-- especially

in a time of crisis--, city planning wasn't really a profession at the time, and that's

not a sarcastic remark, it literally wasn't, which is why we have interstate highways going

straight through city centers, and why many attribute Vancouver as being the only major

city in North America without a city-center highway.

Back in the 50's and 60's, the car was asserting itself as the dominant method of

transport in the US.

Why take a streetcar, when you have the bonds and cheap gas to drive freely in your own

car on fresh, new roads, connecting suburbs to the city center?

However, interstate highways take up a lot of space, and give off a lot of pollution,

and these city-center highways also separated neighborhoods, and sliced cities apart.

It also made it easier to commute between the city center and the far-off suburbs, and

city sprawl isn't particularly good for the environment.

Those who live in far off suburbs often have bigger houses, and more and bigger cars, and

have not much more of a choice than to drive them further and more often.

Oh well, all in the sake of personal freedom, I guess.

BROADWAY BRIDGE Next we have the Broadway Bridge, not to be

confused with the Broadway Bridge in Little Rock; Manhattan; Daytona Beach; Saskatoon;

Greenville, OH; St. Peter, MN; Little Falls, MN; or in Kansas City.

It is the first bridge we've so far covered that is a draw bridge-- which is interesting,

because Portland has a lot of those--, and this bridge is the sole reason why NW/SW 7th

Avenue is actually called NW/SW Broadway, since it was now connected with NE Broadway.

Because that's how street names apparently work.

The Broadway Bridge gives us a good insight into the history of the North American streetcar.

While today, there are two sets of tracks for the Portland Streetcar, those have only

existed since 2010, when they were rebuilt after 66 years of non-existence.

In 1913, when the bridge was first built, it was built with streetcar tracks, as the

streetcar was very popular in the turn of the 20th century.

This was especially before the rise of the American middle-class in the 40's and 50's,

when American manufacturing was the most competitive in the world, since it wasn't completely

destroyed in WWII.

Little competition from German, Japanese, French, Chinese or British industries, alongside

affordable mortgages for returning veterans, contributed to what many call "America's

golden age".

Oh, and car and road-related companies won contracts to pave roads, sell cars, and sell

cheap gas, and tear up many streetcar tracks nationwide.

We didn't need those old things, the age of the car was starting!

Of course, as many an Angelino, or a resident of both Washingtons, has found out, the car

has a whole host of problems, notably traffic and pollution, and streetcars have been making

a controversial, yet nationwide comeback.

Actually, more of a continental comeback, because, Toronto, in part from the revenue

they bring to developments in the area.

Ever notice how all the streetcar stations are sponsored?

STEEL BRIDGE The Steel Bridge, opened in 1912 (replacing

an earlier bridge built in 1888), is a mixed-traffic railway/road bridge, operated by Union Pacific

Railroad.

It largely connects Lloyd District almost to the city center, as well as being a common

point of travel for 4 MAX lines.

It also carries Union Pacific and Amtrak trains, and a walkway on the lower deck.

The name of the bridge does stem back to its construction, since steel wasn't exactly

the most popular bridge-building material at the time.

When it originally opened, much like the Broadway Bridge, it was originally built with streetcar

tracks, until they were abandoned in the 40's.

In the 50's, it served as a vital connection to 99W through Harbor Drive.

No, I don't mean Harbor Blvd., Harbor Drive.

If you've never heard of it, that's because it doesn't exist anymore.

Just as its construction required the tearing down of tens of houses and buildings along

the riverfront, it too was paved over and forgotten.

It was replaced by Tom McCall Waterfront Park, now connected by a walkway through the Steel

Bridge's lower deck to the Vera Katz Eastbank Esplanade.

This is actually widely cited as one of the first instances of highway removal projects

in the US.

In the 80's, the bridge was closed for two years, while it went through a much needed,

$10 million rehabilitation to catch it up with the times, at least enough to carry a

new light rail line, connecting the city center, the burgeoning Lloyd District, NE Portland

and Gresham-- later making up half of the blue line-- opening in 1986.

Another interesting thing about the Steel Bridge is how it deals with being a double-decker

bridge, with that middle deck being so low.

The lower deck, once again, was built for national and international trains to pass

along the rail lines into NW Portland, but the middle of the lower deck, because it's

so low, can actually raise up into the air for smaller river crafts.

One unfortunate consequence of the low clearance is making the Steel Bridge vulnerable to unforeseeable

immense floods.

This happened in 1948, and again in 1964, and yet again in 1996.

Because severe rains and excess mountain runoff couldn't have ever happened to the Willamette

Valley before, and it's really important for the bridge to at least provide clearance to

Dragon Boat teams.

Though, I suppose the walkway is good if you're really scared of heights.

BURNSIDE BRIDGE The Burnside Bridge was also an early 20th

century replacement for a late 19th century bridge.

The Burnside Bridge was built in the roaring 20's to replace a swing-span truss bridge,

a type of bridge where the middle turns 90 degrees whenever a tall boat wanted to come

through.

This turned out to be very slow, so the new designers opted for a double-leaf bascule

bridge, a type of drawbridge.

The bridge was rebuilt through a $4.5 million bond that also funded the Ross Island and

Sellwood Bridges.

However, the original engineers were soon recalled, after it had been revealed they

had received $500,000 more than the lowest bid, inviting a new company to finish the

job.

The Burnside Bridge was also directly influenced by the City Beautiful Movement of the early

20th century.

This is evident in the bridge's two Italian Renaissance style towers and fences in between

the towers.

The western one actually houses the controls for the bridge.

The Burnside Bridge, only having to open around 40 times a month, does so with the help of

two counterweights, each weighing 1,900 tons, in order to raise the two huge sections of

bridge.

The bridge used to carry three lanes of traffic going each way, but was later upgraded to

add bike lanes in each direction, and now carries only two westbound traffic lanes.

The bridge is now even a designated emergency route, as it has been reinforced in case of

a strong earthquake.

The Burnside Bridge's west side is also home to famous local landmarks, like the White

Stag Sign, the Portland Saturday Market, and Skidmore Fountain and its MAX station.

It's also not too far from the Shanghai Tunnels, showing a glimpse into some of Portland's

less savory past.

Oh, and there's also that place with the donuts with Lucky Charms on them, and that

stuff.

MORRISON BRIDGE The Morrison Bridge goes between SE Morrison

St. to, strangely, not SW Morrison St. Its eastern ends are on SE Morrison and Belmont

streets, while its western ends are on SW Alder and Washington Streets, the latter being

a block north of the MAX tracks on SW Morrison.

I think we can establish that many streets on the eastside don't always line up perfectly

with their westside counterparts.

The Morrison Bridge is described as a "Chicago-style, double leaf bascule" bridge, which does

not mean it's a deep-dish bridge.

The Morrison Bridge, because of its size and location, leading to downtown Portland and

I-5, is perfect for commuters to and from the city center and everywhere to the north.

It epitomizes highways inside of Portland, carrying 50,000 cars a day.

That's almost as many as there are daily maintenance projects, from the view of many

of said commuters.

The original Morrison Bridge, built in 1887, was a wooden, swing-span bridge.

As the first bridge to cross the Willamette River, it was also the longest bridge west

of the Mississippi River at the time.

It was originally a toll bridge, and carried horsecars, which were replaced by electrified

streetcars.

It became free in 1895, and was then replaced by a new one in 1905.

The 1905 bridge, however, was not the one we know today, which was not built until 1958.

Unfortunately, as car ownership skyrocketed, it became obvious that this bridge, not actually

designed for cars, needed to be replaced.

Finally, the current Morrison Bridge was opened in 1958, with a marching band performance

from Wilson and Benson High Schools, organized by Portland Mayor Terry Schrunk, and even

fighter jets flying overhead.

HAWTHORNE BRIDGE The Hawthorne Bridge is a vertical lift bridge,

similar to the Steel Bridge.

In fact, it is the oldest one in the United States that is still running to this day,

having opened in 1910.

The Hawthorne Bridge is a big deal in SE and SW Portland, carrying 30,000 motor vehicles

every day, as well as hundreds of TriMet buses.

Additionally, it carries thousands of bicycles and pedestrians on a nine meter wide, shared

sidewalk on either side.

It has also become a citywide hub for biking and transit, the two ways of commuting Portland

always brags about.

One major downside of its low clearance, though, is that it has to be raised 200 times every

month.

This is of course very inconvenient for one of Portland's busiest bridges.

Good thing there's an app for that (Bridge Alerts).

The bridge was named for Hawthorne Boulevard, which itself was named after the late J.C.

Hawthorne.

Hawthorne was a politician in both Oregon and California in the 1850's, and is also

known for having established the infamous Oregon Hospital for the Insane, on the street

that now bears his name, back when East Portland was its own city.

It was quickly closed, and replaced by the Oregon State Hospital in Salem.

The latter hospital served as the primary filming location for the One Flew Over the

Cuckoo's Nest movie.

The Bridge itself, though, was involved in the 2003 movie The Hunted, featuring a scene

taking place on the MAX on the Hawthorne Bridge.

The only problem was that the MAX only crosses the river on the Steel Bridge and Tilikum

Crossing, so they made two articulating buses that looked like MAX cars, and even installed

fake overhead power lines, proving that it can take serious dedication to intentionally

do something the hard way.

MARQUAM BRIDGE The Marquam Bridge is well known around the

city for being rather ugly, and was built to connect I-5 on the east and west sides

of the Willamette-- remember, the Fremont Bridge wouldn't be built until 1973, so

this was a major piece of infrastructure-- unfortunately for those who have to live here,

that's all it was built for, literally just that.

It's essentially just there.

In function, it's really kind of like a southern Fremont Bridge, but really only in

function.

Perhaps its opening day celebrations wouldn't be too surprising; on the 28th of February,

1966, in place of an all-out celebration with fanfare and parades and the like, the Marquam

Bridge's barriers were simply, quietly removed, with vehicle traffic being opened soon after.

In obvious stark contrast to what the Morrison Bridge got.

The Marquam Bridge carries traffic on two decks, westbound on the bottom, and eastbound

on top, reverse of the Fremont.

It has a beautiful view at night, but only really for passengers, as the person driving

has to navigate all the turns and curves, and all the traffic.

Think of a heavily congested roller coaster.

Additionally, there are no sidewalks, no bike lanes, no rails, no bus lines.

It is just designed for cars.

Unfortunately for those who really, undeniably hate it, tearing it down would actually be

a terrible idea, as this is the single busiest bridge in the entire state of Oregon, and

one of the busiest in the Pacific Northwest.

Carrying Interstate 5, one of the west coast's major lifelines, means it supports nearly

136,000 cars and trucks a day, as of 2008 statistics.

This is nearly twice the daily usage of the Lions Gate Bridge in Vancouver, and can even

rival that of the Golden Gate Bridge.

While this is obviously nowhere near the busiest bridge in the country, it is pretty clear

that the Marquam Bridge can't really be replaced that easily.

TILIKUM CROSSING Tilikum Crossing is Portland's newest bridge,

having opened in September 2015 with the MAX Orange Line, and finally connecting the Streetcar

A/B Loops into actual loops around the city center.

Tilikum Crossing serves the distance between the new South Waterfront district, and OMSI,

providing both areas with a MAX station, and extending the MAX to inner SE Portland.

Tilikum Crossing has also been nicknamed "the bridge of the people", as it doesn't allow

cars across.

The word Tilikum was also chosen for the name of the bridge, as it comes from the indigenous

Chinook Wawa language, and means 'people', or 'tribe'.

Also hence, 'bridge of the people'.

Tilikum Crossing is the only bridge on this list where cars are banned, only allowing

pedestrians, cyclists, the MAX, the Streetcar, and buses, also known as 'everyone else'.

It's essentially the exact opposite of the Marquam Bridge, with beautiful night lights

to go along.

Tilikum Crossing carries the MAX and the streetcar across the river, which is no small thing,

as it allows crucial rail access across the river, south of the city center.

This was the infrastructure that finally made direct, high speed access from the city center

to SE Portland and Milwaukie possible.

The inner southeast of Portland has recently seen a large wave of development projects

and businesses popping up, with the advent of the Orange Line (technically the Yellow

Line, but still).

On the west side, though, is the burgeoning new South Waterfront District, the Dubai of

Portland, since it all sprang up in the last 15 years.

Not very long ago, the whole area was barely more than an empty plot strangely close to

the city center, and right at the foothills of the Marquam Hill, where the Oregon Health

and Science University (OHSU) is.

This meant that they could easily expand, especially with their own Aerial Tram downhill

access, across I-5.

In 2015, Tilikum Crossing and the MAX Orange Line were arguably the last steps in putting

this area truly on the map, as well as finally closing the streetcar loop.

ROSS ISLAND BRIDGE The Ross Island Bridge, named after the nearby,

uninhabited Ross Island, has the task of carrying US Highway 26, known on the eastside as SE

Powell Blvd., and to me as, "wait, I thought this was SE Division?".

US Highway 26 goes all across the state of Oregon, from the Idaho state line, just south

of where I-84 crosses the border, over to Seaside, where it intersects with US Route

101, serving as a common route between Portland and the Oregon coast.

There entire route, though, goes all the way east to Ogallala, in western Nebraska.

The Ross Island Bridge, while passing directly through and over South Waterfront, actually

serves more inland neighborhoods, connecting with 99-W (or SW Naito) in a bit of a weird

configuration, before continuing off west to the coast.

Built in 1922 with cars in mind, it only has one narrow sidewalk, situated on the northern

side.

It was paid for with the same $4.5 million bond that helped build the Burnside Bridge.

Currently, though, the bridge is undergoing a three-year, $30 million repainting that

started back in 2014.

So, any moment now…

Despite the name, the Ross Island Bridge does not actually stop off in Ross Island, it passes

just north of it.

This means that Ross Island, named after Oregon pioneer Sherry Ross, and actually part of

a small archipelago, can only be reached by a boat.

However, those living on Ross Island can simply leave and come back by flapping their wings.

That's because Ross Island serves as a wildlife reserve, ever since Ross Island Sand & Gravel

Co. (RISG) donated use of the archipelago to the city of Portland in the 2000's.

Before this, the archipelago was a big hotspot for underwater dredging, especially after

the US Army Corps of Engineers built an artificial levee, connecting the once separate Ross and

Hardtack Islands.

This made an artificial lagoon that made dredging considerably easier.

Of course, though the company still lives on, the dredging in the area is no more, since

birds and otters don't really spend their time dredging for concrete.

SELLWOOD BRIDGE Our last bridge on our list is the Sellwood

Bridge, located at SW is-this-really-still-Portland?

St., and which recently underwent a huge rebuilding project.

The original Sellwood Bridge was built in 1925 by Gustav Lindenthal, and replaced a

much-complained-about ferry service, kind of like what happened up north.

(Hence Taylor's Ferry Road that starts nearby.)

The bridge was a truss bridge, and was open for 91 years.

However, as time wore on, several problems were noticed with the bridge, mainly the huge

cracks forming at either end.

With the bridge's condition having been deteriorating since the 1960's, the weight

capacity of trucks was lowered from 32 tons to just 10 tons in 2004.

It was also very narrow, even for the 20's, with incredibly narrow sidewalks, one lane

of traffic, and not much thought for bikes.

Additionally, it was not built for huge weights, and was therefore not quite as sturdy.

In 2005, Multnomah County and civil engineering company Bechtel decided enough was enough,

and agreed to partner up to replace the ailing bridge.

After years of construction, the new bridge, built right next to the old one, opened on

the 29th of February, 2016, the old bridge having been closed for only four days.

In the mid-20th century, especially the 50's and 60's, America was building itself up.

Having won WWII without suffering any direct losses, or having any international competition

in the markets, caused American infrastructure to boom.

Interstate highways, suburbs, dams, bridges, airports, and everything other than reliable

railways were built in this massive national building spree.

Of course, any structure that is built will have to be repaired if it doesn't want to

end up like the old Sellwood Bridge.

The problem with that, of course, is the new trend in US politics of thinking of infrastructure

as being somehow 'boring', instead of the life or death issue it really is.

Replacing the Sellwood Bridge, instead of repairing the old one, though, actually turned

out a great idea, as it allowed the bridge to be upgraded for better, higher volume traffic.

Including bikes!

At least we didn't end up like Pittsburgh, with their Greenfield Bridge over I-376, which

has been in such deterioration, that another smaller bridge was built underneath to catch

falling debris.

CONCLUSION All these bridges, regardless of their type,

the type of vehicles they carry, their river clearance, or their location, are absolutely

crucial to our city's economy and development, but also to our city's culture.

From the old to the new, the bustling highways to the suburban roads, the beautiful to the

not-so-much, they are effectively the staples that bind our city together, both literally

and metaphorically, and while there are a lot of cities with a notable amount of bridges

crossing a central river, the bridges of Portland are arguably just as important as arm tattoos

and double-decker bikes in making Portland, the city it is.

For more infomation >> Bridgetown - The Story and Legacy of Portland's Bridges - Duration: 23:41.

-------------------------------------------

Trouble Maker - Now (CZECH/ENG sub) - Duration: 3:43.

Tell me now now now

Tell me now now now

Before today ends

Tell me now now now now now now

Just like before you

Made me hesitate again

The you who says nothing

Is just like yesterday

Try saying it straightforwardly

Try looking in my eyes

Before this night is over

Before the starlight disappears

Let's not leave it like this

I said while we hesitate

Time is passing

I don't wanna go

This is the end, right now

I said this is the end

Come to me now, talk to me

We don't have a tomorrow

Don't hesitate

Before it's too late now

Don't push me

Further and further away

Us two, right here, right now

Before it disappears

Tell me now now now

Tell me now now now

Before today ends

Tell me now now now now now now

There isn't any more for us

Tomorrow, tomorrow

So call out, oh

Call my name, my name

Right now you're blowing

It all out of your mouth

On this road

I just want to lean on you

To lean on you

Let's not leave it like this

I said while we hesitate

Time is passing

I don't wanna go

This is the end, right now

I said this is the end

Come to me now, talk to me

We don't have a tomorrow

Don't hesitate

Before it's too late now

Don't push me

Further and further away

Us two, right here, right now

Before it disappears

Us together inside this maze

The only thing I can count on is you

Close your eyes, hold me, because

We have no tomorrow

Come to me now, talk to me

We don't have a tomorrow

Don't hesitate

Before it's too late now

Don't push me

Further and further away

Us two, right here, right now

Before it disappears

Tell me now now now

Tell me now now now

Before today ends

Tell me now now now now now now

Translated: MStoryline

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét