When great and extraordinary powers are vested in any man, or body of men, which in their
exercise, may operate to the oppression of the people, it is of high importance that
powerful checks should be formed to prevent the abuse of it.
Perhaps no restraints are more forcible, than such as arise from responsibility to some
superior power.
— Hence it is that the true policy of a republican government is, to frame it in such
manner, that all persons who are concerned in the government, are made accountable to
some superior for their conduct in office.
— This responsibility should ultimately rest with the People.
To have a government well administered in all its parts, it is requisite the different
departments of it should be separated and lodged as much as may be in different hands.
The legislative power should be in one body, the executive in another, and the judicial
in one different from either — But still each of these bodies should be accountable
for their conduct.
Hence it is impracticable, perhaps, to maintain a perfect distinction between these several
departments — For it is difficult, if not impossible, to call to account the several
officers in government, without in some degree mixing the legislative and judicial.
The legislature in a free republic are chosen by the people at stated periods, and their
responsibility consists, in their being amenable to the people.
When the term, for which they are chosen, shall expire, who will then have opportunity
to displace them if they disapprove of their conduct — but it would be improper that
the judicial should be elective, because their business requires that they should possess
a degree of law knowledge, which is acquired only by a regular education, and besides it
is fit that they should be placed, in a certain degree in an independent situation, that they
may maintain firmness and steadiness in their decisions.
As the people therefore ought not to elect the judges, they cannot be amenable to them
immediately, some other mode of amenability must therefore be devised for these, as well
as for all other officers which do not spring from the immediate choice of the people: this
is to be effected by making one court subordinate to another, and by giving them cognizance
of the behaviour of all officers; but on this plan we at last arrive at some supreme, over
whom there is no power to controul but the people themselves.
This supreme controling power should be in the choice of the people, or else you establish
an authority independent, and not amenable at all, which is repugnant to the principles
of a free government.
Agreeable to these principles I suppose the supreme judicial ought to be liable to be
called to account, for any misconduct, by some body of men, who depend upon the people
for their places; and so also should all other great officers in the State, who are not made
amenable to some superior officers.
This policy seems in some measure to have been in view of the framers of the new system,
and to have given rise to the institution of a court of impeachments — How far this
Court will be properly qualified to execute the trust which will be reposed in them, will
be the business of a future paper to investigate.
To prepare the way to do this, it shall be the business of this, to make some remarks
upon the constitution and powers of the Senate, with whom the power of trying impeachments
is lodged.
The following things may be observed with respect to the constitution of the Senate.
1st.
They are to be elected by the legislatures of the States and not by the people, and each
State is to be represented by an equal number.
2d.
They are to serve for six years, except that one third of those first chosen are to go
out of office at the expiration of two years, one third at the expiration of four years,
and one third at the expiration of six years, after which this rotation is to be preserved,
but still every member will serve for the term of six years.
3d.
If vacancies happen by resignation or otherwise, during the recess of the legislature of any
State, the executive is authorised to make temporary appointments until the next meeting
of the legislature.
4.
No person can be a senator who has not arrived to the age of thirty years, been nine years
a citizen of the United States, and who is not at the time he is elected an inhabitant
of the State for which he is elected.
The apportionment of members of Senate among the States is not according to numbers, or
the importance of the States; but is equal.
This, on the plan of a consolidated government, is unequal and improper; but is proper on
the system of confederation — on this principle I approve of it.
It is indeed the only feature of any importance in the constitution of a confederated government.
It was obtained after a vigorous struggle of that part of the Convention who were in
favor of preserving the state governments.
It is to be regretted, that they were not able to have infused other principles into
the plan, to have secured the government of the respective states, and to have marked
with sufficient precision the line between them and the general government.
The term for which the senate are to be chosen, is in my judgment too long, and no provision
being made for a rotation will, I conceive, be of dangerous consequence.
It is difficult to fix the precise period for which the senate should be chosen.
It is a matter of opinion, and our sentiments on the matter must be formed, by attending
to certain principles.
Some of the duties which are to be performed by the senate, seem evidently to point out
the propriety of their term of service being extended beyond the period of that of the
assembly.
Besides as they are designed to represent the aristocracy of the country, it seems fit
they should possess more stability, and so continue a longer period than that branch
who represent the democracy.
The business of making treaties and some other which it will be proper to commit to the senate,
requires that they should have experience, and therefore that they should remain some
time in office to acquire it.
— But still it is of equal importance that they should not be so long in office as to
be likely to forget the hand that formed them, or be insensible of their interests.
Men long in office are very apt to feel themselves independent [and] to form and pursue interests
separate from those who appointed them.
And this is more likely to be the case with the senate, as they will for the most part
of the time be absent from the state they represent, and associate with such company
as will possess very little of the feelings of the middling class of people.
For it is to be remembered that there is to be a federal city, and the inhabitants of
it will be the great and the mighty of the earth.
For these reasons I would shorten the term of their service to four years.
Six years is a long period for a man to be absent from his home, it would have a tendency
to wean him from his constituents.
A rotation in the senate, would also in my opinion be of great use.
It is probable that senators once chosen for a state will, as the system now stands, continue
in office for life.
The office will be honorable if not lucrative.
The persons who occupy it will probably wish to continue in it, and therefore use all their
influence and that of their friends to continue in office.
— Their friends will be numerous and powerful, for they will have it in their power to confer
great favors; besides it will before long be considered as disgraceful not to be re–elected.
It will therefore be considered as a matter of delicacy to the character of the senator
not to return him again.
— Every body acquainted with public affairs knows how difficult it is to remove from office
a person who is [has?] long been in it.
It is seldom done except in cases of gross misconduct.
It is rare that want of competent ability procures it.
To prevent this inconvenience I conceive it would be wise to determine, that a senator
should not be eligible after he had served for the period assigned by the constitution
for a certain number of years; perhaps three would be sufficient.
A farther benefit would be derived from such an arrangement; it would give opportunity
to bring forward a greater number of men to serve their country, and would return those,
who had served, to their state, and afford them the advantage of becoming better acquainted
with the condition and politics of their constituents.
It farther appears to me proper, that the legislatures should retain the right which
they now hold under the confederation, of recalling their members.
It seems an evident dictate of reason, that when a person authorises another to do a piece
of business for him, he should retain the power to displace him, when he does not conduct
according to his pleasure.
This power in the state legislatures, under confederation, has not been exercised to the
injury of the government, nor do I see any danger of its being so exercised under the
new system.
It may operate much to the public benefit.
These brief remarks are all I shall make on the organization of the senate.
The powers with which they are invested will require a more minute investigation.
This body will possess a strange mixture of legislative, executive and judicial powers,
which in my opinion will in some cases clash with each other.
1.
They are one branch of the legislature, and in this respect will possess equal powers
in all cases with the house of representatives; for I consider the clause which gives the
house of representatives the right of originating bills for raising a revenue as merely nominal,
seeing the senate be authorised to propose or concur with amendments.
2.
They are a branch of the executive in the appointment of ambassadors and public ministers,
and in the appointment of all other officers, not otherwise provided for; whether the forming
of treaties, in which they are joined with the president, appertains to the legislative
or the executive part of the government, or to neither, is not material.
3.
They are part of the judicial, for they form the court of impeachments.
It has been a long established maxim, that the legislative, executive and judicial departments
in government should be kept distinct.
It is said, I know, that this cannot be done.
And therefore that this maxim is not just, or at least that it should only extend to
certain leading features in a government.
I admit that this distinction cannot be perfectly preserved.
In a due ballanced government, it is perhaps absolutely necessary to give the executive
qualified legislative powers, and the legislative or a branch of them judicial powers in the
last resort.
It may possibly also, in some special cases, be adviseable to associate the legislature,
or a branch of it, with the executive, in the exercise of acts of great national importance.
But still the maxim is a good one, and a separation of these powers should be sought as far as
is practicable.
I can scarcely imagine that any of the advocates of the system will pretend, that it was necessary
to accumulate all these powers in the senate.
There is a propriety in the senate's possessing legislative powers; this is the principal
end which should be held in view in their appointment.
I need not here repeat what has so often and ably been advanced on the subject of a division
of the legislative power into two branches — The arguments in favor of it I think conclusive.
But I think it equally evident, that a branch of the legislature should not be invested
with the power of appointing officers.
This power in the senate is very improperly lodged for a number of reasons — These shall
be detailed in a future number.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét