Thứ Ba, 30 tháng 1, 2018

Waching daily Jan 30 2018

Almost ripping the clothes

While I was making a pose

Under the light

I'm under the light

Girl got a pose

She's fin to pose

You're a delight

Give you a rose

Hit me up

Hit me up tonight

I'm asking you for the number

You're solving a problem

Call me tonight

Girl I am the night

Hit me up

Hit me up

Then I'll put on the clothes

Then I'll put on the clothes

I'm under the lights

I'm the night

Girl I'm the night

Girl I'm the night

I don't like problems

Cause it ain't my problem

So what's up Robynne

Girl I'll get you the racks

I came so direct

Cause I'm so direct

I'm asking for the number

There is no problem

Call me tonight

I got your back

Girl I'm the night

I'm asking you for the number

You're solving a problem

Call me tonight

Girl I am the night

Hit me up

Hit me up

Then I'll put on the clothes

Then I'll put on the clothes

I'm under the lights

I'm the night

Girl I'm the night

Girl I'm the night

Call me tonight

Call me tonight

(For the number)

You're solving a problem

Call me tonight

Stop you in a pose

Stop you in your tracks

Girl I'll get you

I'll give you a rose

Hey, you're a delight

Hit me up

Hit me up

Then I'll put on the clothes

Then I'll put on the clothes

I'm under the lights

I'm the night

Girl I'm the night

Girl I'm the night

For more infomation >> 🌜 Rogez - The Night (Official Music Video) | Electronic Dance Song 2018 - Duration: 3:13.

-------------------------------------------

ScienceCasts: America's Debut in Space: Explorer 1 - Duration: 4:09.

[ MUSIC ]

America's Debut in Space: Explorer 1 - presented by Science@NASA

Sixty years ago, on January 31, 1958, the United States joined the "space race"

with the successful launch of the Explorer 1 satellite. But the event was much more than a rocket launch.

Geopolitically, it leveled the Cold War playing field with the Soviet Union,

which had sent Sputnik into orbit four months earlier.

Scientifically, the launch of Explorer 1 represented the first time humans sent instruments into space,

including a modified Geiger counter for tracking radiation, to collect data and relay it back to Earth.

And historically, it led us into an infinite new frontier

that has yielded data, images, and wonders never before imagined.

University of Iowa physicist James Van Allen, who designed and ran the science experiment on Explorer 1

and experiments on myriad subsequent missions,

called the event "one of the landmarks in the technical and scientific history of the human race."

He continued: "Its instrumentation revealed the existence of radiation belts of the Earth

and opened up a massive new field of scientific exploration in space.

It inspired an entire generation of young men and women in the United States to higher achievement

and propelled the Western world into the space age."

Jim Green, NASA's Planetary Science Director, was among those who were inspired,

as a student and protégé of Van Allen's at Iowa.

"Dr. Van Allen was a pioneer of the space age, and the results from his Explorer 1 instrument

marked the birth of space science. The discovery of the radiation belts encircling the Earth

was a game changer for space exploration. Space was no longer thought to be empty,

and for that the man and the mission will long be remembered."

Spacecraft en route to Earth orbit or deep space must dash through the Van Allen belts,

donut-shaped regions of charged particles trapped by Earth's magnetic field.

The high-energy particles can batter spacecraft and even interfere with onboard instruments.

To ensure the safety and health of astronauts and space science missions,

scientists have been uncovering vital information about the radiation belts ever since Explorer 1 discovered them.

In a speech at Cornell University on March 3, 1965, then-NASA Administrator James Webb

explained the critical importance of success in the vast new horizon of space:

"...the mastery of a new environment, or of a major new technology,

or the combination of the two as we now see in space, has always in the past had

the most profound effects on all nations and on all the peoples of the Earth.

...In the modern world, basic knowledge, applied through technology, is a source of national power."

Former NASA Chief Historian Steven Dick summarized the impact of Explorer 1's launch:

"One could hardly have known what this singular event would set off during the next 60 years.

...Like the railroad and the airplane, spaceflight has impacted society in ways

even the visionaries could not have foreseen, and that we cannot fully fathom even today."

The drive for discovery that enabled the success of Explorer 1 endures today at NASA.

The Agency's innovative spacecraft continue to find new ways

to observe and understand the interconnected systems of our home planet

as well as help us see beyond our solar system into worlds we can explore as one.

For more on amazing advancements in space science, visit science.nasa.gov.

For more infomation >> ScienceCasts: America's Debut in Space: Explorer 1 - Duration: 4:09.

-------------------------------------------

Horrible Things Celebrity Chefs Have Said About Each Other - Duration: 5:15.

The celebrity chef world comes with big palettes - and even bigger mouths.

Some of our favorite celebrity chefs are known for being the meanest critics when it comes

to their peers.

Here's a look at some of the horrible things celeb chefs have said about each other.

Andrew Zimmern and Tyler Florence

In 2009, Bizarre Foods host Andrew Zimmern made zero attempts to hide his disdain for

Tyler Florence.

In a now-deleted blog post, Zimmern said,

"Monday's episode [of Momma's Boys] featured the world's least talented TV chef, Tyler

Florence, once again churning out the questionable cooking advice and leading the ladies through

a menu of the mom's fave recipes.

Watching Florence wolf down the food, stare and ogle every a** that strolled by his cutting

board and play the role of local TV stud was high comedy of the highest order."

In a quick response on Facebook, Florence threw it right back at Zimmern by saying,

"This guy Andrew Zimmern... has decided to diss my life's work because I did, my personal

friend, Ryan Seacrest, a favor and helped him out with his first big television production,

Momma's Boys…

It's bubble gum reality, who cares?

I guess it's hard to have a sense of humor when you're on your 10th take of eating Yak

testicles, smiling to the camera, wondering where your life went wrong.

Mmmmm, delicious!

Go get 'em guys."

Yikes!

Anthony Bourdain about Sandra Lee

According to Anthony Bourdain, Sandra Lee is

"...pure evil… this frightening Hell Spawn of Kathie Lee and Betty Crocker seems on a

mission to kill her fans, one meal at a time."

He's not a fan of her store-bought ingredients, which led to him calling her out during a

Food for Thought Forum in 2009 over her now-infamous Kwanzaa cake.

"Please go home, Google Sandra Lee and Kwanzaa cake.

Then, count how long it's gonna take for your head to explode!"

Several years later, he still wasn't over it.

In his second book, Medium Raw, Bourdain mentions a night at a party where Lee snuck up behind

him and slid her hands up his jacket in a way that even left his then-wife shocked.

She said he had been a "bad boy" and Bourdain says he felt like it was something out of

the movie Cape Fear.

We think it's safe to say he may avoid dissing her cooking style in the future.

Anthony Bourdain and Guy Fieri

It's no secret that Anthony Bourdain has no filter when it comes to speaking his mind

about his colleagues… especially Food Network star Guy Fieri.

Bourdain has made it very clear he's not into Fieri's style, even calling Fieri's Time Square

restaurant a "terror dome."

In 2011 when Fieri's Lamborghini was stolen, Bourdain tweeted that he borrowed it for a

drive and "it smells like Ed Hardy in here."

And in 2015, Bourdain told Atlanta Magazine,

"I sort of feel in a heartfelt way for Guy.

I wonder about him.

He's 52 years old and still rolling around in the flame outfit…What does he do?

How does Guy Fieri de-douche?"

For the record, Fieri was only 46 when Bourdain was ripping him.

Fieri definitely had words to say about Bourdain's behavior, telling GQ Magazine in 2015,

"I know he's definitely gotta have issues, 'cos the average person doesn't behave that

way.

… It's just, what are you doing?

What is your instigation?

You have nothing else to f---ing worry about than if I have bleached hair or not?

I mean, f---."

Martha Stewart and Rachael Ray

In a Nightline interview, Martha Stewart said she thought Rachael Ray was more of an entertainer

than an actual cook, saying,

"Well, to me, she professed that she cannot bake…

She just did a new cookbook which is just a re-edit of a lot of her old recipes.

And that's not good enough for me."

Ray took it in stride and actually agreed with the statements, telling Us Weekly,

"Why would it make me mad?

Her skill set is far beyond mine.

That's simply the reality of it."

Stewart eventually extended an olive branch, saying on her show,

"I truly believe that Rachael has done a terrific job bringing people, many people who would

have never even stepped into the kitchen or made a dish to cook…

I really had a great time being a guest on her show, and it was a lot of fun to have

her on this show making pie with me too.

Come on back, Rachael, anytime you want…"

Alton Brown and Anthony Bourdain

Finally someone challenges Anthony Bourdain.

After vocalizing to People that 252 episodes of his show Good Eats is plenty to make his

resume worthy, Alton Brown went on to question Bourdain's place in the kitchen, asking,

"When was the last time you saw Anthony Bourdain actually cook anything?

…I've spent 14 years cooking my own food on television and I've never seen him cook

a meal."

Brown tempered his remarks with some words of praise - for Bourdain's writing, though,

not his cooking.

"I think that [he] is probably the best writer about food.

I'm jealous of his work.

He pokes a lot of things and that's fine; you have to have critics, issue provocateurs,

so to speak…

I'm a fan, and the few times I've gotten to work with him I enjoyed it immensely."

Gotta love a little friendly competition and trash talk every once in awhile.

Gordon Ramsay and Jamie Oliver

These two have been feuding for what seems like decades.

Ramsay has been all over Oliver, nicknaming him "one-pot wonder" and throwing shade at

him for being too busy to attend his own restaurant opening.

But Oliver gives as good as he gets, telling The Mirror,

"Gordon [...] is deeply jealous and can't quite work out why I do what I do and why

he can't do that.

He is too busy shouting and screaming and making our industry look like a bunch of shouters

and screamers.

He's paid to rant.

He's paid to shower negativity."

The worst part?

Poor James Corden is caught in the middle.

"Where did you seriously learn to cook?"

"Um…

Jamie Oliver, really.

That's the truth" [Laughter]

Thanks for watching!

Click the Mashed icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> Horrible Things Celebrity Chefs Have Said About Each Other - Duration: 5:15.

-------------------------------------------

What Scalise wants to hear from Trump's State of the Union - Duration: 5:50.

For more infomation >> What Scalise wants to hear from Trump's State of the Union - Duration: 5:50.

-------------------------------------------

A TURMINHA DO SULCA VISITA: E.E.B Caetano Bez Batti - Duration: 4:11.

For more infomation >> A TURMINHA DO SULCA VISITA: E.E.B Caetano Bez Batti - Duration: 4:11.

-------------------------------------------

30 Second TV Spot | The Phantom of the Opera on Broadway - Duration: 0:31.

Christine...

Broadway's longest running musical invites you to celebrate 30 haunting years.

The Phantom of the Opera.

Visit phantombroadway.com

For more infomation >> 30 Second TV Spot | The Phantom of the Opera on Broadway - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

Triathlon Training with Sarah True and Matt Dixon's Purple Patch Fitness Pro Team - Duration: 5:51.

- [Man] We are headed to meet up with Sarah True,

current Half Ironman awesome athlete.

(light music)

No chance keeping up with Sarah

or the Purple Patch crew there.

(light music)

So I think that you all deserve a little bit of

housekeeping, I haven't really explained what was

going on, I was in...

(light music)

C'mon, trainiacs, gotta run, gotta run,

gotta run, gotta run!

(grunt)

Step over the invisible line.

We are headed to meet up with Sarah True,

current Half Ironman, awesome athlete.

Mel's driving, I'm terrified.

Sarah's down here in Scottsdale with her hubby, Ben,

and just go out for a swim today,

a little of strength work when we get together with her.

We're going to hopefully kick her ass in some board games

and bring you all along.

Right hand turn.

Right, the right.

[Woman] Oh, other right. (laughs)

- [Man] Yeah, the one that's not straight.

- [Woman] Good morning!

(laughs)

(light pop music)

- [Man] Yeah, I would very proudly say that I have no chance

keeping up with Sarah or the Purple Patch Crew there.

Well, I tell you Scottsdale, Arizona, Tempe,

whatever you want to call it, you are making a play

for me spending some time here.

I like it!

So, I think you all deserve a little bit of housekeeping.

I haven't really explained what was going on.

I was in Tempe for

the Triathlon Business International Conference.

That was Friday, Saturday, Sunday.

Yesterday, we left.

We're now in Scotsdale and yesterday I did a podcast

with Matt Dixon because I wanna start doing

more pro content.

Frankly, I'm tired of seeing myself train.

My form is ugly in the pool,

I'm chubby on the bike, and my run is like a wildebeest

just charging around, so, yeah.

So, what we're doing tomorrow is we're following around

the Purple Patch triathlon team.

That's Matt Dixon's triathlon team.

Got Sam Appleton, who was fourth at Half Ironman World.

He's got Laura Siddall, who was second, Ironman New Zealand.

Sarah Piampiano, who's just winning all over the place

and a whole bunch of elite age-groupers here.

So, we're gonna accompany them for their

four hour brick workout tomorrow

and our old pal, who you might remember from back in Austin,

Sarah True is around.

Actually swam next to her and I might as well

have been a pylon in the lane next to her,

she passed me so quickly.

We're gonna hook up with her while she does a

track workout tomorrow and I realize this is probably

a very short video today but that's because

we spent, after finishing up at the pool there

with Purple Patch and Sarah, doing my own workout,

we have been getting all the camera gear ready

for six, seven hours of shooting, interviewing,

and meeting.

Over the next few weeks, we're gonna have

some day in the life with Sarah, Laura,

Purple Patch Triathlon Team.

It's gonna be fun.

It's gonna be a lot of fun.

One of the reasons why I'm so jazzed up to be spending

some time with Matt Dixon and his team in because

Matt's methodology of training is very appealing.

It's science-based and it's a less is more,

and, specifically for busy amateurs, where essentially

our body can't distinguish between stress at work

or stress just from being a stressed out person

and physical stress caused by training

that he recommends that you have to keep all of that in mind

and that, if you're a very busy, time-crunched person,

you may actually be faster doing a 12 hour training week

as opposed to a 20 hour training week.

He has people in his squad that have qualified for

Kona, gone sub 10 hours on, I think,

a nine hour training week.

So, any time that I can learn fro a guy like that,

I am so it!

And thank you to Matt.

So, everyone, stay tuned.

We got really good stuff coming up.

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh!

And, last thing, I know that if you had subscribed

to the nutrition calculator,

right now the calculator's busted.

Seems like every now and again somebody goes in there,

changes the privacy settings,

and screws it up for everyone else.

So, I'm working on that.

I'm gonna fix it.

As soon as it's fixed, everyone that's into that will know.

Alright, now...

Ooh, hey, a dog!

Ooh, a dog with a bad leg.

For more infomation >> Triathlon Training with Sarah True and Matt Dixon's Purple Patch Fitness Pro Team - Duration: 5:51.

-------------------------------------------

Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL 847-427-6200 Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL - Duration: 1:16.

Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL. Are you in the market for replacement windows for your home?

Are air leaks and drafts from your windows adding unnecessary costs to

your heating and cooling bills?

Your windows are designed to not only improve your home's appearance,

but to also save money on your heating and cooling costs.

When shopping for replacement windows you have a lot of important

decisions to make..

Luckily, we're here to help!

We're certified local window contractors that can help guide you through

the window purchasing process according to your speci?c style and budget.

We also understand that installation, including anchoring, insulating and

sealing the window to the house to make it airtight and watertight, is as

important as the quality of the window itself.

If it's time to enhance the beauty and value of your home with new

replacement windows, give us a call today for a free, no-pressure in-home

consultation!

For more infomation >> Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL 847-427-6200 Custom Window Estimate Lincoln Park IL - Duration: 1:16.

-------------------------------------------

How to paint waves (easy) - Step by step - Beginner Painting Tutorial│♥Alexandra ♥ - Duration: 10:11.

For more infomation >> How to paint waves (easy) - Step by step - Beginner Painting Tutorial│♥Alexandra ♥ - Duration: 10:11.

-------------------------------------------

LEGO Jurassic World 2018 sets - They're going all out! - Duration: 1:57.

The first batch of LEGO Jurassic World The Fallen Kingdom sets

has been revealed today, and there will be seven System sets.

But, we're also getting three Juniors sets and three Duplo sets,

and the press release also say there will be a Brick Headz set,

books, clothing, and animated videos.

Like wow.

I knew the Jurassic World 2015 sets sold well,

but LEGO is going all out here.

I've never seen a movie get Juniors, Duplo,

and regular System sets at the same time.

Like, even Star Wars, which is LEGO's most popular licensed line,

has never gotten Juniors or Duplo sets.

Kids love dinos and LEGO knows this sells.

Many of the other sets have leaked,

but for the only three revealed today,

the regular system set is a decent $40 set for the value,

I won't get it though, since the Blue the Raptor and the Ken Wheatley and Owen minifigures

all come in the big Mansion set.

Can't wait for that one to be revealed sometime.

The press release actually mentions that more sets

will be shown at the New York Toy Fair.

The Juniors set is good for kids - the unknowing parents will overlook

its fifty price tag which is ridiculous for 150 pieces.

At most, I'd like the set to be 40 bucks,

considering the T-Rex is a big figure,

but it still doesn't look like enough play for a fifty dollar set.

It's a shame since I think the build here is really fun -

it reminds me of this Jurassic Park 3 set which I loved when I was younger,

and the baby dino is so cute.

The Duplo set is adorable, and a good deal for thirty bucks.

It's so weird to see Owen as a Duplo minifigure,

since he's more of an adult character.

I dunno.

Little things to note - I guess Mattel owns that cutesy Jurassic World kids logo,

because LEGO is still using the main logo that will probably scary away Duplo kids,

and my gosh, the packaging is beautiful for regular sets - the corner art is incredible.

Still, it's weird how the logo is just Jurassic World,

and not Jurassic World The Fallen Kingdom.

The back of the box shows how you can build hybrids,

and it also shows which dinos come in which sets -

which is useless in my opinion,

since it doesn't count the two store exclusive sets and the Juniors sets.

Anyways, what do you guys think?

Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

I'll see you guys later.

Peace out.

Bye.

For more infomation >> LEGO Jurassic World 2018 sets - They're going all out! - Duration: 1:57.

-------------------------------------------

Supergirl Season 3 "Hero's Journey" Trailer (HD) - Duration: 1:05.

Reporting from downtown National City,

it seems Supergirl is just about everywhere these days.

The thing that makes woman strong is that we have the guts to be vulnerable.

Oh my God.

We have the ability to feel the depths of our emotion

and we know that we will walk through it to the other side.

It's here.

The end of days.

This is your purpose.

To fight the devil.

Take your best shot.

I have been trying to get you to embrace your humanity.

But forget that.

Be Kryptonian.

You want justice in the world?

So do I.

But you don't have to be my enemy.

National City is my town.

Supergirl Mondays at 8/7c on The CW.

For more infomation >> Supergirl Season 3 "Hero's Journey" Trailer (HD) - Duration: 1:05.

-------------------------------------------

PULLING OUT OF THE KSI vs JOE WELLER FIGHT PRANK - Duration: 11:36.

For more infomation >> PULLING OUT OF THE KSI vs JOE WELLER FIGHT PRANK - Duration: 11:36.

-------------------------------------------

15 Second TV Spot | The Phantom of the Opera on Broadway - Duration: 0:16.

For 30 years one musical has haunted Broadway like no other.

Visit phantombroadway.com

For more infomation >> 15 Second TV Spot | The Phantom of the Opera on Broadway - Duration: 0:16.

-------------------------------------------

Rapper Insults Trump, The Don Hits Him Back With Historically Lo - Duration: 5:39.

Rapper Insults Trump, The Don Hits Him Back With Historically Low Black Unemployment

When rapper Jay-Z claimed during a CNN panel discussion on racism that President Donald

Trump is a white supremacist and bad for the black community, it wasn�t unusual.

After all, Jay-Z is a prominent Obama supporter and part of a hip-hop community not exactly

known for skewing Republican.

What was unusual was when the president decided to respond to the �4:44� rapper, noting

that African-American unemployment under his administration has �been reported to be

at the LOWEST RATE EVER RECORDED!�

Jay-Z (real name Shaun Carter, husband of Beyonc� for those of you who have been living

under rocks for the past few years) made the remarks on CNN when commentator Van Jones

asked him about the president�s alleged �s***hole countries� remark.

The rapper likened it to when then-Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling was embroiled

in controversy over disparaging remarks about blacks he was recorded making in a phone conversation

with his girlfriend in 2014.

�This is how people talk.

This is how they talk behind closed doors.

It was a moment when Donald Sterling had been exposed as this racist on a private phone

conversation that he was having,� the former Shaun Carter said, according to Breitbart.

Sterling ended up losing the team over the matter.

�It�s like, OK, that�s one way to do it,� Jay-Z continued.

�Another way would have been to have his team and let�s talk about it together and

let�s � maybe some penalties because once you do that, all of the other closet racists

just run back in the hole.

�You haven�t fixed anything.

You have sprayed perfume on the trash can.

What you do, when you do that is the bugs come and you spray something and you create

a superbug because you don�t take care of the problem.

You don�t take the trash out, you keep spraying whatever over it to make it acceptable.

As those things grow, you create a superbug.

And then now we have Donald Trump, the superbug.�

Jones, an Obama staffer who once called Trump�s victory a �whitelash,� did stick up for

the president in a devil�s advocate sort of way: �To give him a little bit of credit

too, he is somebody who is now saying, look, I�m growing � I�m dropping black unemployment.

Black people are doing well under my administration,� Jones said.

�Does he have a point that maybe the Democrats have been giving us good lip service, but

no jobs.

He may say terrible things, but putting money in our pockets.

Does that make him a good leader?�

The rapper was having none of it.

�No because it�s not about money at the end of the day.

Money is not � money doesn�t equate to happiness.

It doesn�t.

That�s missing the whole point.

You treat people like human beings, then � that�s the main point,� Mr. Z responded.

�You can�t treat someone like � it goes back to the whole thing, you going to treat

me really bad and pay me well.

It�s not going to lead to happiness.

It�s going to lead to, again, the same thing.�

That�s an interesting take from someone whose lead single off his last album bragged

�I bought some artwork for one million / Two years later, that s*** worth two million / Few

years later, that s*** worth eight million / I can�t wait to give this s*** to my children.�

A few bars earlier during that financial advice-obsessed song, �The Story of O.J.,� Jay-Z noted,

�You ever wonder why Jewish people own all the property in America?

This how they did it.� And while the rest of Mr. Z�s oeuvre isn�t that overtly anti-Semitic,

it is similarly money- and status-obsessed.

Trump took to his favorite medium, Twitter, to one-up the rapper in epic fashion.

Indeed, under that �super-bug,� the black unemployment rate fell to 6.8 percent in December,

the lowest number in the 45 years it�s been charted.

Yet, according to Jay-Z, this is all a sign of Trump�s emotional deficiencies.

�Somewhere along his lineage, something happened to him,� Jay-Z said.

�Something happened to him and he is in pain and he is expressing it this sort of

way.�

I�ll take Freudian projection for $200, Alex.

In the meantime, if Jay-Z is happy with the lip service paid to him by the Democrats,

he�s wealthy enough to take it.

I think most Americans, much like the president, would take the lower black unemployment index.

And lest Mr. Carter believe what he�s receiving isn�t lip service, I�d like to point out

that the aforementioned Donald Sterling � the racist former owner of the Los Angeles Clippers

� was a Democrat.

What are your thoughts on Jay-Z's remarks?

Scroll down to comment below!

For more infomation >> Rapper Insults Trump, The Don Hits Him Back With Historically Lo - Duration: 5:39.

-------------------------------------------

WATCH: Viral Video Surfaces of Anti-Trump Rapper Jay-Z PUNCHING 12-Yr-Old Girl. - Duration: 2:13.

WATCH: Viral Video Surfaces of Anti-Trump Rapper Jay-Z PUNCHING 12-Yr-Old Girl.

Rapper Jay-Z recently appeared on CNN recently, bashing President Donald Trump like it's

his job.

It goes without mention that Jay-Z is a buffoon, known adulterer and drug dealer.

Check this out…

From Fox News:

Jay-Z went home from the Grammys empty-handed, even though he was the most-nominated artist

of the night, capping off a bad weekend for the rapper that included a highly publicized

feud with President Trump.

[…]

Jay-Z began the music awards weekend with an interview on CNN, during which he criticized

Trump's alleged "s—hole countries" remark.

He also said lower unemployment for the country's African-American population is not enough,

when people in power are still mistreating minorities and others.

"It's not about money at the end of the day," he said on "The Van Jones Show."

"Money doesn't equate to happiness.

It doesn't.

That's missing the whole point.

You treat people like human beings.

That's the main point."

The comments sparked a response from Trump, who tweeted: "Somebody please inform Jay-Z

that because of my policies, Black Unemployment has just been reported to be at the LOWEST

RATE EVER RECORDED!"

Trump's response:

An old video has now emerged of Jay-Z punching a little girl.

From Hip Hop DX:

Apparently Jay-Z had a problem with a female in a shocking video that was pulled out of

the archives of the Backstage DVD by HipHopDX.

As of this time I have yet to hear from my numerous contacts at Roc-A-Fella in regards

to Jay-Z's side to this affair.

But, if pictures speak louder than words then Jigga-man has some explaining to do.

The assault looks unprovoked as HOVA walks into what looks like a backstage area of a

concert venue.

DAMN!

This is a big friggin' deal!

Will the mainstream media say anything?

Doubtful.

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> WATCH: Viral Video Surfaces of Anti-Trump Rapper Jay-Z PUNCHING 12-Yr-Old Girl. - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

Why You Need the Hard Times - Duration: 5:08.

JOYCE: SO I AM A VERY FOCUSED, A VERY DETERMINED

PERSON AND IT'S KIND OF A REQUIREMENT FOR WHAT I'M DOING.

BUT IT ALSO PRESENTS A CONSTANT CHALLENGE BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS

GETTING INTERRUPTED.

[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]

JOYCE: AND I JUST WANNA THINK.

WHEN I'VE GOT A PLAN OR A GOAL AND ANYONE OR ANYTHING

INTERRUPTS IT OR APPEARS TO BE THROWING IT OFF-COURSE,

I HAVE TO REALLY TRY

WITH A LOT OF PRAYER TO BE PATIENT AND...

SO I'M GONNA TELL YOU A FUNNY STORY.

I WAS ON MY WAY TO DO A CHURCH SERVICE AND IF THERE'S ANYTHING

I CAN'T STAND IT'S TO BE LATE FOR MY OWN STUFF.

[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]

JOYCE: I MEAN, WHEN IT STARTS, I WANT

TO BE RIGHT OVER THERE, PAYING ATTENTION TO WHAT'S GOING ON

BECAUSE I'M MISS RESPONSIBLE.

IT'S MY DEAL.

I WANNA MAKE SURE THAT IT ALL GOES RIGHT.

WE GOT LOTS OF GOOD PEOPLE BUT I STILL WANNA BE THERE.

AND OH, YOU SHOULD SEE IF I GET STUCK IN A TRAFFIC JAM.

IT'S JUST LIKE...

NOW, YOU KNOW, I'VE--I HAVE SOME SELF-CONTROL

BUT IT'S, LIKE, IT'S A CHALLENGE.

HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT?

THERE'S CERTAIN SITUATIONS THAT ARE JUST MORE CHALLENGING FOR

YOU THAN OTHERS.

WELL, SEE, THOSE ARE THE ONES WE WANT TO ATTACK WITH GOD

AND--'CAUSE YOU TAKE GROUND ONE STEP AT A TIME, OKAY?

I'M REALLY PRETTY PATIENT WITH GOD NOW.

I'M NOT, I MEAN, 'CAUSE I'VE KIND OF FIGURED OUT, I'M NOT

GONNA MAKE HIM HURRY.

SO I MEAN, I'M OKAY WITH THAT.

YOU KNOW, IF HE GIVES ME WHAT I WANT IN A WEEK, THAT'S FINE.

AND IF HE GIVES IT TO ME IN 25 YEARS, THAT HAS TO BE FINE

BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT GONNA MAKE GOD HURRY SO I'VE JUST--I'VE

KIND OF CHILLED OUT WITH THAT ONE.

BUT I STILL KINDA TRY TO CONTROL OTHER STUFF SOMETIMES.

SO WE'RE ON OUR WAY TO THIS CHURCH SERVICE.

WE'VE GOTTA PASS THESE TRAIN TRACKS.

WELL, THE TRAIN THINGY, BOARD THING, IS DOWN AND THE LIGHTS

ARE FLASHING AND NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN,

NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN, NO TRAIN.

AND THE TRAFFIC'S BACKING UP, BACKING UP, BACKING UP.

NOW PEOPLE START TURNING ROUND AND GOING THE OTHER DIRECTION,

TURNING--SO OBVIOUSLY, SOMETHING WAS WRONG AND THE THING WAS DOWN

AND THERE WAS NO TRAIN.

SO WE FINALLY DID A U-TURN AND SO NOW WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO TAKE

THIS DETOUR AND GO THROUGH ALL THESE STREETS WE'RE NOT EVEN

SURE ABOUT AND I'M, LIKE, I'M GONNA BE LATE.

I DON'T WANNA BE LATE.

AND SO DAVE IS VERY GENEROUS IN HIS DRIVING IN THAT HE USUALLY

LETS A LOT OF PEOPLE IN.

[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]

JOYCE: SO WE'RE DRIVING.

I'M, LIKE, WANTING TO GET THERE AND I SEE THIS CAR INCHING OUT

OF THIS SIDE STREET AND DAVE STARTED SLOWING DOWN.

AND OUT OF MY MOUTH COMES, "DAVE, THIS IS NO TIME TO BE

NICE."

[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]

JOYCE: HE SAID, "NO, WE DON'T WANNA BE NICE, WE'RE ON

OUR WAY TO CHURCH.

THAT WOULD NOT BE A GOOD THING TO BE NICE ON YOUR WAY

TO CHURCH."

[AUDIENCE LAUGHING]

JOYCE: AND IT WAS SO FUNNY, SO FUNNY.

SO I WANNA BE WHO I AM.

I LOVE MY PERSONALITY.

I LOVE WHAT I'M DOING.

I LOVE MY AGGRESSIVE NATURE.

SO THAT MEANS THAT I'M GONNA JUST--

[AUDIENCE APPLAUDING]

JOYCE: KEEP WORKING WITH GOD.

AND SEE, THE GOOD NEWS IS, IS I KNOW HE LOVES ME ANYWAY.

I'M NOT GONNA GO TO HEAVEN BECAUSE I'M PATIENT BUT I WANT

TO BE FULLY PATIENT BECAUSE HERE COMES THE PAYOFF.

ARE YOU READY FOR THIS?

AUDIENCE: YEAH!

JOYCE: YEAH, YOU'RE READY.

YOU WANT THIS, DON'T YOU?

AUDIENCE: YES!

JOYCE: OH MY GOSH.

JAMES 1:2 THROUGH 4, "CONSIDER IT WHOLLY JOYFUL,

MY BRETHREN, WHENEVER YOU'RE ENVELOPED IN OR

ENCOUNTER TRIALS OF ANY SORT OR FALL INTO VARIOUS TEMPTATIONS."

NOW, YOU KNOW, REALLY THAT'S A GREAT SCRIPTURE BUT NOBODY

REALLY DOES THAT.

I MEAN, IT'S LIKE DID YOU NOTICE HOW QUIET YOU WERE WHEN I

STARTED READING THAT?

NOBODY CHEERED.

NOBODY CLAPPED FOR THIS.

"CONSIDER IT JOYFUL WHEN YOU'RE IN ALL KINDS OF TESTS

AND TEMPTATIONS AND TRIALS."

WELL, YOU CAN'T BE JOYFUL ABOUT THE TRIAL BUT WHAT WE'RE

SUPPOSED TO BE ABLE TO DO IS TO LOOK BY FAITH BEYOND WHAT WE'RE

GOING THROUGH TO WHAT IT'S GOING TO DO FOR US SPIRITUALLY.

[AUDIENCE CHEERING]

JOYCE: 'CAUSE, SEE, YOU HAVE TO HAVE

THE HARD TIMES TO LEARN TO CONTROL THE SOUL.

[AUDIENCE APPLAUDING]

For more infomation >> Why You Need the Hard Times - Duration: 5:08.

-------------------------------------------

Honda Driver-Assistive Technologies: Blind Spot Information System - Duration: 0:14.

This is the Blind Spot Information System.

Now available or standard on most Honda vehicles.

For more infomation >> Honda Driver-Assistive Technologies: Blind Spot Information System - Duration: 0:14.

-------------------------------------------

WH hints at 'eye-opening' statement on North Korea in SOTU - Duration: 6:07.

For more infomation >> WH hints at 'eye-opening' statement on North Korea in SOTU - Duration: 6:07.

-------------------------------------------

SON DAKİKA | TRANSFER | Galatasaray Ninja Lakaplı Sol Bek Yuto Nagatomo'yu İnter'den Kiraladı - Duration: 14:10.

For more infomation >> SON DAKİKA | TRANSFER | Galatasaray Ninja Lakaplı Sol Bek Yuto Nagatomo'yu İnter'den Kiraladı - Duration: 14:10.

-------------------------------------------

How To Use A Laser Cutter - Lightblade Learning Lab 39 Photo Engraving on Anodised Aluminium Pt 1 - Duration: 31:04.

Well welcome to another Lightblade learning la.

Today we're going to carry on with the theme that we started last time and that

is, we're going to start off by looking at damage to materials and a quick

examination of this concept that I tried to explain to you last time, about damage

threshold. Now you may remember this very simple little test pattern, we used this when

we were developing speeds for engraving onto wood and card or

organic materials. Now we're going to use this same pattern again today because at

254 pixels per inch it gives us a point 1 dot and a point 1 space along the

bottom here and it gives us an opportunity to work out just what size

dots we're getting. Now with paper and card we found that we couldn't get much

better than about 0.15 dot size and the dot size was the thing that basically

limited us to the speed and the resolution of picture that we could work

with. I've got some red paper here, I'm going to use this as a starting point so

the first thing we need to do is to set the focus to the to the correct height, 5,

6, 7, there we go so we're going to run this at 13% Max and Min power because

13% is in that pre-ionization zone before the tube gets fully

powered-up. Now that gives us a very high frequency, very high power

pulses and we can do quite a lot of damage at this low power.

We're running this at 250 millimetres a second, but the dots are showing that

because they are tending to run into each other, they're not very clear,

they're probably nearly 0.2 sausages by 0.10 ~ 0.15 maybe now the problem is if

I slow it down to make the sausages correct I shall probably start burning

a hole through the paper. Can I reduce the power a little bit more? Well we'll

try, I could probably take it down as low as maybe 9% for this machine.

Hardly any marks and this also demonstrates just how sensitive the

power setting is at this very low range. We've eventually got a perfect set of

dots; at 9.5% max and min power and 120 millimeters a second. So we've had to

slow it down to get the right amount of power to give us a good shaped dot.

What we've done, we've found the damage threshold, the perfect damage threshold

for this particular piece of material, a piece of finished paper. Around the

outside here, we're not producing burn marks we're actually producing white

marks and what we're really doing is pulling the dye out of the paper.

But when we look carefully under the microscope you'll see that we're

actually still burning holes through the paper. So what we've now got here is a

piece of white card, which has got quite a lot of china clay in it and we'll just

see what those same settings of 9.5% can do on this piece of paper and the answer

is not very much. Let's try 10%, now 10% is not bad....

Okay, so now here we have a piece of black perspex and I shall just have to just set the focus

up again and we're using black perspex because it will show up the

marks a little bit better. So we'll run the ten and a half percent at 120

millimeters a second and see what damage we can do. Yeah, we can do something, we

shall see that under the microscope so that's the same damage threshold as

white card two completely different materials with the same damage threshold.

Now would you have believed that, this rather stringent dot test that I use

will tell us the sort of speeds and feats (power) that we can use for doing dot

pictures. Now with some of those materials it may well be that we can run

at a slightly faster speed but the problem is we're running at a slow speed

to get perfect dots but we're not getting a very good colour, we're not

getting a very good burn. If we put the power up, we shall make the dots bigger

and what we should be doing if you remember back to our last session, the

brown halo around the hole is the thing that we shall be seeing as our dot. Not

the actual dot, the powerful dot itself. So that's why there isn't too much control

over the dot size as we increase the power. We've got to deal with another

problem of somehow decreasing the power so that we don't burn a hole, but we do

produce a brown mark. So it all comes back to this thing about energy density

and time that we talked about last time. Remember when we were burning the wood

in an unfocused beam, how it took a long time to burn, but we were able to put a

mark on the surface of the wood with very low unfocused power. But once we

took it to the other side of the lens all of a sudden that same power was able

to burst through. So you've got to keep those those facts in mind, power density

and the time that you allow the high density mark to sit in one

place or you decrease the density of that mark and that's something we shall

have to play with in a future session. The next thing that I want to look at, it's

the main part of today's session is anodised aluminium. I suspect that some

of you guys won't really understand what anodised aluminium is. You'll have heard

of it and you will recognize it when you see it because understanding about

anodised aluminium is going to help you understand how and why we damage it.

Okay, now what I've got here is a piece of ordinary aluminium, this is a piece of

aluminium extruded bar and as you can see the surface finish on it is not

particularly good. It's raw aluminium and on the other side I've polished it. Now

if I put that in front of the laser beam I should get about 98% of the beam

bouncing back at me it will act just like a mirror. Polishing the surface has

a small effect and it may well increase the reflectivity by 1% up to 99%. Now I

say that sounds a really strange property because aluminium is a very

good transmitter of heat what we've got to remember is and I keep reinforcing this,

the laser beam itself is not hot. It's only when the laser beam stimulates the

atoms in this surface that we get an energy transfer. If we get reflection off

the surface there is no heating effect. Well that's why you wouldn't want to use

naked aluminium for any of the parts inside this machine. My other machine

over there for example first came to me with an aluminium bed. The first thing I

did was to cover it with a piece of mild steel which has only got a 60%

reflectivity and as it reflects it causes the Rays to diverge and the

energy density gets dissipated. Anodising is a process that you can put onto this

material you dip this into a bath with some chemicals and some electrical

contacts and it will convert the surface of this material into a

nonmetallic oxide. If you could imagine sprinkling salt on the surface granular,

well that's what this surface gets converted into it's not loose salt that

you can shake off obviously but it's a granular surface that this metal gets

converted to by a chemical reaction. Bear in mind this granular structure that's

on the surface is non metallic it is no longer aluminium it's an aluminium oxide.

Now what is aluminium oxide? Well you can see aluminium oxide in sandpaper or

emery paper or things like that, it's a very very hard material it's used for

grinding wheels in industry. So the surface of this material has now been

converted into a very hard material, but it's got an open pore structure. They dip

this product into a sealant which seals up

all the pores and stops the outside atmosphere and anything else from going

through the pores and attacking the raw aluminium that's still underneath. Okay

now that's a two-stage anodising process, you can go for a three-stage anodising

process and that's what this piece of material has been through. After the

first stage of oxidation on the surface, instead of dipping it into a clear

sealant, what they've done is they're dropped this into a bath of dye. You can

get all sorts of colored anodized aluminium but it's only the dye that

they do for the second operation that's giving the anodised aluminium its colour

and then after the dye has gone into the surface and sat between all the granules

they then put the sealing coat on top so now we've got a colored anodized

aluminium product. We're not going to burn through the very hard oxide coating,

we're just going to put enough heat into it to evaporate the dye that's in the

product so this is yet another damage mechanism, we're not attempting to damage

the material. We want just enough energy to evaporate the dye so this might be

quite a delicate balancing operation to get the dye out without damaging the

material. Now until I had these little sample squares made, so that I could do

some demonstrations for you guys. The only product that I had that was

anodized was a piece of channel section and this has got gold anodise on it, but

this has been industrially produced in bulk and I suggest that probably this is

a very very thin anodizing process that's taking place in here. Whereas this

has been done by a small plating company where they specialize in high-quality

plating rather than let's call it high-volume industrial

plating. We will test this and see whether this performs differently to

this. Okay, so here we've got our piece of black acrylic, we were in the pre-

ionization region and we were able to damage this at 10.5% power .10.5% power

is down at probably something like about 3 or 4 watts

coming out onto the job. So it was a very small amount of power but running at

slow speed that we were able to damage this, so it's the

apportionment of power over time that gives us damage to a product and we're

gonna start off with those same numbers on this piece of gold anodizing and see

what sort of results we get. Well it's interesting we've got some damage.

I'm going to run the same test on this black anodize because I've got a half a

suspicion that I shall not be able to damage this at these settings.

Well my half a suspicion is wrong, it's actually done quite a nice job so that's

at 10.5% / 120 millimetres a second they are really very clean little dots in

fact I would say the gold anodizing needs more power to burn through. Okay so

now I'm going to run 120 millimetres a second at 13%. It's the upper of those

two sets they don't look any different just because we've increased the power,

we've more than doubled the power. We also run a test on the gold anodizing at 120

millimetres a second and 13% power. Well they're also now beginning to look very

nice between these two products there's something in common.... the white background.

We're just drawing the dye out of the material and we're leaving the white

oxidised surface behind, that's the key to this process so we're down at very

very low powers at the moment. I'm just going to carry on with the black one,

because it's the black one that I want to demonstrate. We'll just set this to

seven millimeters, eight, seven, click, done!

I'm sorry I don't use the autofocus on this machine because it is so much

quicker to set it by hand. Now I'm going to try something really silly and that

is we're going to double the speed so we've found the threshold where it

looked very very good and we found that at 13%.

And 13% is about as high as this machine works in its pre-ionisation mode,

its high-frequency pulsing and that's why we're getting I think quite good

resolution on these dots. Right we've now gone to 250 millimeters a second same power

13%

and I think you can see we're beginning to lose it a little bit, we've lost the

centre line of dots. The dots are actually still quite nice dots but

they're not as dark as they were in this one, because we're not allowing quite

enough time for the dots to form properly at 250 millimeters a

second. We've doubled the speed, we've basically allowed half the amount of

time. At 13% we're running at about 12 watts, so after we take let's just say we

take 20% off we're down to probably about 9 or 10 watts here. So let's double

that up to 18 or 20 watts which means we need maybe 30 watts coming out of the

tube. So we need to go up to about 22 or 23 percent power. In other words what

we're doing, we've halved the amount of time which means we halved the amount of

power that we're putting into every dot. So if we double the power we should be

back to where we were here. And there we go, we've gone from that to that

and now we've doubled the power but also doubled to speed we're back to this and

maybe a little bit better. Those blocked dots there look as though they may well

have merged, we've got a lovely row of dots along the centre and yes what we've

got here now we've got dots that are more or less touching. So they're

sausages, they're little oval shape pieces which are just about touching so

they're about 0.15 or 0.12 wide and almost maybe 0.19 long but we are

running at 250 millimeters a second. As well as trying to demonstrate what the

damage threshold for materials is, because this is a very special type of

engraving material. What the limits are that we can go to, we can certainly go to

250 millimeters a second and probably get a reasonable picture. This is a

resolution of 250 pixels per inch as well, 254 to be exact so we're already

able to go probably two times faster with twice the resolution than we could

do with wood or with card. I have heard that you can actually run at a thousand

pixels per inch and get good quality pictures, now that's quite a long way to

go at the moment. A thousand pixels per inch. I've developed a thousand pixels

per inch pattern here that we can run, to see whether we can

succeed in getting any sort of results for a thousand pixels per inch because

that would be some mighty resolution if we could, we'd be able to produce almost

perfect photographic representations on black anodized surfaces. Because the

surface is black and the background is white, whereas when we do it with paper

we've got brown, various types of brown whereas here we've only got two colours.

We know we've only got two colours to start with black and white. We're going

to run this thousand pixels per inch test at the ideal speed that we found

when we were running the 250 pixel test ie 13% power and a hundred twenty

millimetres a second. So we'll use it as our starting point.

I'm actually staggered to say that we do look as though we've got individual

pixels running along there, but whether there is I think it's a hundred pixels

that I had along there we'd have to count them underneath the microscope

because I certainly can't do it with my, with my little eye glass here. Let's

change the speed up to 240 and let's double the power up to 23%.

There's virtually nothing that I can pick out by way of an individual pixel,

that probably is because we are now running the power in solid beam mode ie

the beam is on all the time and it takes a finite amount of time for the beam to

die off and come back on again. Whereas when we were doing this, at 13% the

beam was switching on and off incredibly quickly and it was probably punching

these. If I got it synchronised correctly it would be punching these at the same

speed as the dots were passing by. What I'm going to do now is something which

would not normally be done for photo engraving. Now I'm going to go into

RDWorks which is connected up to the Machine and press the read button across

the bottom there and make sure that I'm reading into this table here what's

actually in the machine. So I've got the Machine settings here now available to

me on this screen. I'm now going to look down these settings and somewhere I

should find a scanning mode and there it is there, look, scan mode / common mode

and this strange word underneath Facula size 50 to 99 percent. Change from

common mode and I get a choice here I get this thing called special mode. I'm

going to set the Facula size to 50% and I'll explain what I'm doing

shortly, an engraving factor hundred. So now I've got to write that information

back to the machine, which I've now done. So now I've set the Machine up into

something called special mode and let's go and see what effect it has on my

results. Now I've not changed anything with the settings and previously we had

23 percent power 230 millimeters a second and we were producing a solid

block, let's see what happens now. We've got lots of individual dots there but

I'm not so sure we've got as many dots, so what we can do we can push the power

up a little bit. Let's go from 23% to 50% special mode.

Well I would say we have not got individual pixels anymore

we've got something which are sort of pixely you can see that there are blobs

that are joining together so you know it may well work. We're currently at 230

millilitres a second and 50% power

now that is quite phenomenal

let's be silly shall we and drive it up to 400 millimeters a second and see what we

get. Now we're being really silly, 400 millimeters a second and 70% power.

Now we're nearly back to seeing individual pixels there, not quite but

hey we've got the machine running flat out. Okay we're going to run that test

again and I want you to look what's happening to the ammeter,

now 70% power should be somewhere up here at about 22 milliamps. What on earth is

going on? Well remember that we got some half-decent results when we were running

down at 13% power, we got nice crisp dots provided we didn't run too fast, but

basically what happens is as the tube starts up it will go through this phase

of high-frequency impact Engraving pre ionization before it settles down to a

constant current. Now it will do this every time we start the tube up. So if if

we're running at 40%, 40% power will be this but for the first few milliseconds

or microseconds after we turn the tube on it will go through this phase of high

frequency before it settles down to a stable current. Now provided we use the

Machine at very very low currents we can keep it in this region and at 13% I was

running it like this so the current never managed to settle down throughout

my test it was continuously going up and down. So the dots didn't have a chance to

burn into each other because there was only little pulses of power there all

the time. The photograph that we're going to work with is going to be broken down

into black pixels on a white background and what happens is every pixel that

appears black and sometimes it's a group of pixels rather than a single pixel. The

beam will switch on and the current will flow and the beam will switch off when

it gets to the end of a pixel or a block of pixels and it will stop and then it

will switch back on again and the current will flow. There's no current

flowing when the beam is switched off so it's only when the beam is switched on

that the current flows and it flows continuously.

When we look at the blocks of pixels under the microscope

we'll find that the current has had a chance to build up and burn through

whereas when we get a single pixel its hardly had a chance to reach

maximum power before it switches off and that's the balance point that we had to

achieve when we were burning Brown pixels onto wood or paper. I've now set

the machine into a special mode and I've done a trace for you of power which is

the red line and the switching on and off which is the blue line. As you can see, there

is my pattern that top line are the continuous lines and they match up with

this pattern under normal circumstances what you'd see is you'd see the signal

switching on here, off because it's blank then back on off on off on off, but with

special mode it's broken up into 20,000 Hertz signals. I've set the Fukuda to 50%

so that means the signal is only on for 50% of the time so I've divided the

power effectively by 2 but in reality it's a lot less than that because I

don't think the actual physics of the machine through the power supply can

respond that quickly, but that's what the machine is trying to do. It's trying to

break these continuous signals into smaller pieces.

These are single dots, sometimes we've got signals which break up the dot is on

long enough to produce like 2 or 3 little signals and then at other times

there's not enough for it to only do 1 pulse 2 pulses one and a half one two

one three you know we're getting a strange pattern

along here an aliaising pattern basically where the pulsing does not

coincide with the pixels. We're likely to get varying colours on these pixels

because we haven't got exactly the same signal on each one now I haven't got the

single dots to match up because I've expanded the scale so that you can

basically see what's happening. Look we've got a dot a dot a dot a dot and a

bit, that dot is broken into two, that dot is broken into two, a dot, a dot, something

funny going on there you know we've got some randomness taking place along here.

So we've got again inconsistency in the power signal for single dots. Now if I

need more colour in my dots I can't increase the powe,r I've got to

decrease the speed to increase the time per dot by decreasing the speed we

shall allow more power per unit of time to burn our dots.

I hope I'm getting the message over to you about this relationship between

power and time instantaneous amount of energy in a spot to do damage. I've

already done quite a lot of experimental work on my other machine over there if

you want to go to my RDWorks Learning Lab YouTube channel you'll find

information, detailed information about the experimentation that I went through,

but I've had to go through a similar test procedure on this machine to make

sure that this machine is going to perform the same as my other machine

over there and it looks as though this machine may well perform better than the

other machine over there. That's 400 pixels per inch

240 speed 50/50 power this one is 600 pixels per inch 240 speed 50/50 power and

this one is a thousand pixels per inch it was still done at 240 millimeters a

second but it was 40% power. Now however you look at that that's pretty damned

amazing, so in the next session I plan to go through the preparation of a

photograph to produce a thousand PPI image. It's not this one

but it'll be a different image and we'll test out how well it works on this

machine now that we've got a set of test parameters which promised to give us a

thousand pixels per inch.....

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét