Chủ Nhật, 4 tháng 2, 2018

Waching daily Feb 4 2018

laws of Newton, the theory of evolution, the hypothesis of multi-verses

after all what is the difference between a hypothesis, a law and a theory?

(Introduction)

Singularity '' Helping to disseminate science in Brazil ''

Are cosmologists all right? here who speaks is the Vini of the channel Singularity

And this one is another video clarifying how science works

today we will see the difference between a theory one, hypothesis and a law

which are basically scientific ideas with a somewhat different validity and function

First we will have to define what is a scientific fact

A scientific fact is an unquestionable thing that happens in nature

Every time I throw an object it will fall towards the ground

This is an unquestionable fact always happens, happened and will happen

No matter your belief or your faith, the flu virus always through natural selection

It will evolve with the virus stronger and so a new vaccine will have to be created

This is why vaccination against influenza

It has basically all year

Now the hypotheses, laws and theories

They are approaches that try to explain these scientific facts

These invariable phenomena occurring in the universe

Let's start with a hypothesis

One hypothesis would be with an idea only that a more scientifically based idea

A hypothesis must still be tested and falsified

or an idea that has not yet been proven

A good hypothesis proposes tests

to test its validity

For example, the superstring hypothesis

This is a hypothesis that says that everything in the universe

It is made of small strings, small filaments of energy

This idea makes predictions of certain events

She for example says that we collide particles

It is possible that we found particles with for example

The gravitations, then if we find the gravitations

means that the hypothesis is probably correct

A good hypothesis proposes tests to be made and is falsifiable

But as every hypothesis

the superstring hypothesis has not yet been proven

when a hypothesis is proved it becomes a theory

A scientific theory has a totally different meaning than the meaning of everyday life

On a daily basis when we talk about a theory

We have some idea about something.

An idea that may be totally unfounded

Like Flat Earth Theory

hollow earth theory

Theory of the hollow moon

Already in science the meaning of theory

It is a proven hypothesis, a well-founded idea

That through the scientific method, through several tests it proved correct

A theory is one of the greatest credibility of a scientific idea

Theories are tested over time

For example

The theory of general relativity was proposed in 1915

But it is tested until today

And has already been proven by numerous tests such as:

Gravitational waves

The Michelson-morley experiment, atomic clocks and planes at last

A theory in science is highly respected for example

The theory of evolution is equally valid

the theory of general relativity, Darwin's natural selection theory of evolution

It is basically a scientific fact, believing or not the influenza virus

I evolve year after year and so I need a basically annual vaccine

To combat this virus

theories are grounded by scientific facts

And even stricter tests such as

Alfred's continental drift theory, or better known as Pangeia

It is not just an idea without foundation

The idea of pangeia is that all the continents formed a great continent called Pangea

Wegner was intrigued by the fact that fossils of the same species

ferns that were extinct were found on both sides of the Atlantic

Even more curious were the fossil discoveries of the same dinosaurs in the

two continents and why the same unique pattern would be found in

layers of rock in brazil and south africa

and under what circumstances tropical plants could have

Wegener concluded that there was only

a logical solution to this puzzle is the existence of only a supercontinent

in the land he called him a pangea

When Galileo said that a hammer and a feather

would fall in the same vacuum

Physicists did not accept this as absolute and supreme truth

They developed

For example, the astronauts of the apollo 11 mission

They literally did this experiment

And I'll drop both at the same time expecting them to hit the ground at the same time

Amazing

Galileo's findings were correct

Then the astronauts on the moon threw a leg and a hammer and saw that the idea of Galileo was correct

The International Space Station

It was built to perform several experiments with low gravity

To prove several ideas, such as Galileo's ideas

So never confuse a scientific theory like an unfounded idea

If someone says that evolution is just a theory, tell it that it is right

but theory in science is totally different than the word theory we use every day

A theory is basically dictated as truth in science

But why are these theories not regarded as laws?

A theory and a law are equally valid

The difference is that a law describes a phenomenon such as the law of gravity

It says that there is a force of attraction between objects

It describes the existence of this phenomenon

For example, the first law of thermodynamics describes the existence of the energy phenomena always conserved

She does not describe why this happens.

The law of universal gravitation also does not describe why objects are attracted

So a law basically describes the existence of a phenomenon not exactly

Because it happens

For example, Einstein's theory of general relativity

It's a theory, it describes how gravity works

And already the law of the universal gravitation of Newton

Just say that gravity exists

He does not really know how it works, so a theory will never be a law

Evolution will never be a law

Because a theory and a law have different functions in the scientific environment

But they have basically the same validity

So that's it, a hypothesis is an idea

Which still needs to be confirmed, a theory is a hypothesis has already been confirmed

And who can describe a wide range of phenomena

Already a law also goes through the same rigors of scientific verification

That is, it is as valid as a theory but it describes the existence of an event

Not exactly why it occurs and how it works

So that's it folks, I hope you liked the video if you liked let your liked it

Comment us if you have any questions or suggestions

Follow the Singularity in social networks and subscribe to the channel so you do not lose any videos

And that's it guys until the next video and talked!

Subtitles: Vinícius Dutra

For more infomation >> Difference between theory, law and hypothesis | Singularity - Duration: 8:06.

-------------------------------------------

Seth Explains Teen Slang (Super Bowl Edition): Prom Brady, Fake Punt - Duration: 1:11.

For more infomation >> Seth Explains Teen Slang (Super Bowl Edition): Prom Brady, Fake Punt - Duration: 1:11.

-------------------------------------------

Hey! Super Bowl Edition - Duration: 0:51.

For more infomation >> Hey! Super Bowl Edition - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

ENIGMAS DE LA HISTORIA con Jesús Callejo - Duration: 44:54.

For more infomation >> ENIGMAS DE LA HISTORIA con Jesús Callejo - Duration: 44:54.

-------------------------------------------

Joyce, Help Me! Is God Even Real? - Duration: 3:47.

"JOYCE, I'VE NEVER BEEN MUCH INTO CHURCH, BUT LONG TO HAVE MY

OWN RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD.

I FEEL HE DOESN'T HEAR ME OR ISN'T LISTENING.

THERE ARE BILLIONS OF PEOPLE ON EARTH.

CAN HE HEAR ME, SEE MY PAIN AND SORROW AS I SEEK HIM,

OR DOES HE NOT EVEN EXIST?

I'M AT A CROSSROADS, BUT I DON'T WANT TO GIVE UP."

JOYCE: WELL, OBVIOUSLY GOD IS EVERYWHERE ALL THE TIME, AND HE

DEFINITELY HEARS US EVEN WHEN WE'RE NOT PRAYING ACCORDING TO

HIS WILL, HE STILL HEARS US.

BUT 1 JOHN 5 SAYS THAT WHEN WE ASK ACCORDING TO GOD'S WILL,

HE HEARS US, AND WE KNOW WITH ABSOLUTE AND SETTLED ASSURANCE

THAT WE HAVE GIVEN TO US THE THINGS THAT WE'VE ASKED FOR.

BUT THERE'S NOTHING IN THERE ABOUT WHEN THEY MANIFEST.

AND I LOVE THIS STATEMENT THAT A DELAY FROM GOD IS NOT A DENIAL.

ACTUALLY, WHEN WE'RE NOT GETTING WHAT WE WANT AS QUICK AS WE

THINK WE SHOULD HAVE IT, THAT'S WHEN REALLY OUR FAITH IS BEING

TESTED AND WHEN WE'RE GROWING.

NOW, I REALIZE THAT THIS IS SOMEBODY WHO'S LOOKING TO KNOW

THAT GOD IS REAL.

AND SO, THEY'RE WANTING GOD TO DO SOMETHING IN THEIR

CIRCUMSTANCES TO PROVE THAT HE'S THERE.

WELL, I CAN'T SAY THAT GOD NEVER DOES THAT, BUT HE CERTAINLY

DOESN'T ALWAYS DO IT BECAUSE FAITH IS THE SUBSTANCE OF THINGS

THAT WE HOPE FOR, THE EVIDENCE OF THINGS THAT WE DO NOT SEE.

SO, I WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE JESSE TO LOOK TO HIS HEART

INSTEAD OF HIS CIRCUMSTANCES.

AND I MEAN, REALLY HOW CAN YOU NOT BELIEVE THAT GOD IS REAL?

I MEAN, TO ME, IT WOULD TAKE MORE FAITH TO BELIEVE THAT GOD

IS NOT REAL THAN TO BELIEVE THAT HE IS.

HOW COULD WE POSSIBLY EVEN LOOK AT THE WAY OUR OWN BODIES

FUNCTION AND ARE PUT TOGETHER AND JUST HOW AMAZING THEY ARE,

AND THINK THAT ALL JUST KIND OF SORT OF HAPPENED ONE DAY?

AND SO, BELIEVING IN GOD IS THE BASIC FOUNDATION TO ANYONE

HAVING A GOOD LIFE.

YOU KNOW, NOW I DON'T BELIEVE THAT GOD IS GOING TO GIVE US

THINGS THAT ARE NOT ACCORDING TO HIS WILL.

SO, I DON'T KNOW WHAT JESSE'S ASKING FOR.

IF HE'S ASKING FOR SOMETHING THAT'S NOT RIGHT, THEN GOD'S NOT

GOING TO GIVE IT TO HIM.

AND I THINK WHEN YOU HAVE A DEEP ENOUGH RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD,

AND YOU KNOW, IT TOOK ME A FEW YEARS TO GET TO THIS,

BUT I'VE KIND OF COME TO THE POINT WHERE I BELIEVE

THAT IF GOD DOESN'T GIVE ME WHAT I'M ASKING FOR,

IT'S NOT BECAUSE HE'S HOLDING OUT ON ME AND WANTING TO MAKE ME

MISERABLE.

I BELIEVE IT'S BECAUSE HE HAS SOMETHING BETTER IN MIND,

AND I'M JUST NOT WISE ENOUGH TO KNOW HOW TO ASK FOR THAT

BETTER THING YET.

GINGER: YEAH, IT'S OFTEN MERCY, ISN'T IT?

JOYCE: SO, WHETHER GOD GIVES ME WHAT I WANT OR HE DOESN'T

GIVE ME WHAT I WANT, GOD IS STILL GOOD, AND HE HAS OUR BEST

INTEREST IN MIND, AND THINGS WILL COME OUT RIGHT IN THE END.

GINGER: AS I READ THIS QUESTION FROM JESSE, IT SAYS,

"I LONG TO HAVE MY OWN RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD."

SO, IT SEEMS LIKE THE HOLY SPIRIT

IS WILLING AND WORKING THERE, THAT THERE IS SOMETHING

THAT IS HAPPENING OR THAT STATEMENT WOULDN'T EVEN

MEAN ANYTHING.

JOYCE: WELL, AND TO BE HONEST, THE THING FOR HIM TO GO

AFTER IS NOT SO MUCH WHATEVER IT IS THAT HE WANTS TO SEE GOD DO,

BUT PURSUING THAT RELATIONSHIP.

BECAUSE WHEN YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM IS RIGHT, THEN YOU'RE

ABLE TO TRUST HIM TO DO WHAT'S RIGHT AT THE RIGHT TIME.

SO, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE SEEK GOD'S FACE AND NOT HIS

HAND, TO SEEK TO KNOW HIM AND NOT JUST WHAT HE CAN DO FOR US.

HE'LL GET THERE.

For more infomation >> Joyce, Help Me! Is God Even Real? - Duration: 3:47.

-------------------------------------------

O Ses Türkiye 2018 Şampiyonu Belli Oldu!!Şampion/Lütfiye - Duration: 1:14.

For more infomation >> O Ses Türkiye 2018 Şampiyonu Belli Oldu!!Şampion/Lütfiye - Duration: 1:14.

-------------------------------------------

Exercising with Tia Chabela - Duration: 3:02.

Sheila what are you doing??

MIja thats not exercising, that's called wasting time

I Could teach you better than that video

You think youre better thaan the video??

Is that a challenge, you dont believe me??you'll see and your gonna end up shookk

Bam Im ready and letss startt

Alright Tia, I believe you and will never doubt you again

For more infomation >> Exercising with Tia Chabela - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

Desmond Tutu Biography - Duration: 1:55.

On african icons today we have desmond tutu.

Desmond Mpilo Tutu was born on October 7, 1931 in Klerksdorp South Africa.

His father was an elementary school principal and his mother worked as a cook and cleaner

at a school for the blind.

The South Africa Tutu was born to a rigidly segregated society.

Although as a child Tutu understood that he was treated worse than white children based

on nothing other than the color of the skin.

He was resolved to make the best of the situation and he still managed to have a happy childhood.

His family moved to Johannesburg when he was 12 and it was around this time he contracted

tuberculosis and nearly died and because of this he was determined to get into medical

school.

Tutu was accepted into medical school but his family could not afford the fees.

In 1958 Tutu was enrolled at St. peter's Theological College and was ordained as an

Anglican deacon in 1960.

Tutu became popular when he became the first black person to be appointed the Anglican

Dean of Johannesburg in 1975.

It was this position that gave him prominence and eloquence in the anti-apartheid movement.

Tutu became a bishop in 1976 and in 1984 he received a Nobel peace prize and in 1985 was

made archbishop.

He was the first black person to hold the position in South Africa.

He has authored books such as 'God's Dream', 'The Rainbow People of God', 'No Future

Without Forgiveness', 'The Book of Forgiving'.

Desmond got married to Leah Nomalizo in 1955 and they have four child.

They remain married today.

For more infomation >> Desmond Tutu Biography - Duration: 1:55.

-------------------------------------------

İLGİNÇ ÜRÜNLERLE PARTİ MAKYAJI DENİYORUM ! - Duration: 4:30.

For more infomation >> İLGİNÇ ÜRÜNLERLE PARTİ MAKYAJI DENİYORUM ! - Duration: 4:30.

-------------------------------------------

5 Most Unusual Hotels In The World - Duration: 6:26.

For more infomation >> 5 Most Unusual Hotels In The World - Duration: 6:26.

-------------------------------------------

CLAUSTRO - Na Laziness o Mais Guru FULL EP (Legendado) - Duration: 18:37.

For more infomation >> CLAUSTRO - Na Laziness o Mais Guru FULL EP (Legendado) - Duration: 18:37.

-------------------------------------------

BTS - Cypher Part 1 [Bangtan Boys] | REACTION - Duration: 6:52.

OKAYtinashe: Yo what's up guys it's your boy OKAYtinashe!

JONNYp: and JONNYp!

Ot: JONNYp from the Z, and you know that it's me. OKAY

We are finally reacting to BTS - Cypher Part 1

What? Jp: One!

Ot: So before we get started please everyone comment down your bias

Second of all please send your reaction req-

OH MY GOSH WHAT IS THAT!?

Jp: Who is that!?

RMK: BTS Cypher 1 let's f%&^$ing go!!!!

Jp: and who is that!?

Official Trigga: Hey it's Seyii

Check me out on SoundCloud at Official Trigga. J-j-j-just check it out

Jp: I'll check it out right now

I like it. Ot: Let me hear it!

[HEHEHEHE]

[POTATO]

Yo what's up guys it's your boy OKAYtinashe and I'm here with the freakin' squad!!!

Squad: Ayyy!!!

You have been asking and requesting & requesting for us to react to Cypher 1

So guess what? We are reacting to the Cypher!

So today we are reacting to BTS - Cypher Part 1. Part 2 and 3 are coming

and we have already reacted to Cypher Part 4. Well with other people but we might react with the group

so we don't know yet stay tuned

Before we get started please comment down your bias and any other video requeeeee

For more infomation >> BTS - Cypher Part 1 [Bangtan Boys] | REACTION - Duration: 6:52.

-------------------------------------------

How To Fix BAD Undercut Hairline (UPDATE) - Duration: 7:14.

For more infomation >> How To Fix BAD Undercut Hairline (UPDATE) - Duration: 7:14.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 Human-Machine Hybrids - Duration: 7:30.

Hello and welcome back to Most Amazing Top 10.

I am Rebecca Felgate and today we are getting technological as we talk about the Top 10

Human machine Hybrids.

Many leading scientists think that humans must merge with machines if we want to survive,

and indeed, many Hollywood movies have depicted as much.

But….could it really happen?

Stay tuned as we have a look at 10 cyborgs making it happen.

10 - Project Cyborg Founder – Kevin Warwick.

Kevin Warwick was professor of Cybernetics at Reading University and now works as Deputy

Vice Chancellor of Coventry University.

Warwick has an implanted microchip in his nervous system.

He first had a chip inserted to his arm in 1998, a simple RFID transmitter that he used

to control lights, doors and other computer controlled devices….turning things in and

off with his arm.

Later, in 2002, he had the chip connected to his nervous system.

He also game the same inplant to his wife, which meant that when someone grasps her hand,

he can feel the same sensation.

9 - Stelarc I studied this guy as part of my drama degree

and from both a performance and science perspective, he is so interesting.

Stelarc is an artist who's focus is the enhancement robotics can have on the human

body.

Stelarc isn't a full time cyborg, but in one performance, called third hand, he used

a robotic third arm which picked up muscle signals and responded with movements accordingly.

In a recent performance, he attached his body to an industrial robotic arm, which choreographed

his body movements for a period of time.

The fact that he has a third ear on his arm is kind of irrelevant to this list… but

I thought I would quickly mention it.

8 - Hugh Herr In the 1980s, Hugh lost his legs in a climbing

accident, however he did not let that stop him.

Since then, he has been relying on prosthetics to climb again.

Herr has since gone on to be a leading man in the field of biomechanics and believes

he will be able to cure paralysis using high tech prosthetics one day.

He created a computerized artificial knee…and on top of that, he and his team were able

to get a paralyzed rat walking again by implanting a dissolvable scaffold seeded with neutral

stem cells.

Herr has never believed he is handicapped, just that technology is, and has worked on

several devices, including bionics that allow amputees to walk with the ease they used to.

At the end of his TED talk, he invited out a dancer, Adrianna Haset Davis who lost her

leg in the Boston Bomingsshe dances on one of his BIOM legs, and watching her move was

incredible!

7 - Nigel Ackland, the man with a Robot Arm.

British man, Nigel Ackland lost his arm in a work accident in the mid 2000s and was since

given a Bebionic arm, a high-tech bionic forearm and hand that can type and move like a real

hand.

The arm was hailed as the most advanced prosthetic hand in the world in 2012.

The arm is controlled by two muscles and allows him use of his hand again….

The sound of it when it moves, though!!!!!

It looks pretty awesome!

Oh my goodness… this looks insane… meet the guy with a hard drive for a finger, Jerry

Jalava at number 6 Imagine carrying all your documents with you

without evening needing to use a bag….

This is Jerry Jalava's life!

So, Finland national, Jalava lost his finger in a motorbike accident in 2009 when he was

in his early 20s.

As a computer programmer, he had the hair-brained idea to turn what was left of his finger into

a USB stick.

At the time, he had a laughable 2 gigs fitted into his USB finger, but these days, his hard

drive capabilities are more supreme.

Founder of the Cyborg Foundation - Neil Harbisson at number 5

Neil Haribisson is a cyborg artist who, with the help of machines, has learned to listen

in colour.

Harbisson is the worlds first legally recognized cyborg who has an inbuilt antenna in his skull.

He did a talk with TED which has had around half a million view on Youtube.

In it he explains how he was completely colourblind, with the ability to only see in greyscale.

Age 21, he had a device, he calls an electronic eye, installed that turns colour into audible

frequencies, allowing him to hear the colour of the world.

He said "when I started to dream in color, I felt the software and my brain had united."

He says his electronic eye is part of him and it even features in his passport photo.

The Cyborg Foundation's co-founder is up next at number 4 we have Moon Ribas

Ribas had a sensor permanently fitted into her elbow in 2013 as part of a project called

Seismic Sense.

This sensor allows her to feel any earthquake on the planet with varying intensity.

In 2008, she wore a speedometer glove that allowed her to determine the exact speed of

movement around her.

Rob Spence – the man with a bionic eye at number 3

Possibly the world's first eyeborg, Spence makes documentaries with his robot eye which

is fitted with a camera.

The Canadian filmmaker shot himself in the eye as a child and he was left blinded.

Eventually he decided that rather than having a regular prosthetic eye, he wanted one which

could function to his advantage.

Eventually he had a small camera eye fitted in 2008 from which he can record around 30

minutes of footage.

While the camera isn't connected to his brain so he can't actually see what he is

recording, research is taking place to see whether this would be a possibility in the

future, which would be a huge step for human machine hybrids.

Spence has worked with other Cyborg's too, making a documentary about them

Jens Naumann at number 2 Naumann lost his sight in two tragic turn

of events, and was unable to see for over 20 years.

However he was offered a chance at sight again in 2002 as part of the Dobelle Institute's

Artificial Vision Project.

Naumann received artificial vision with an electronic eye connected to his visual cortex

with implants in his brain.

The process worked by using a video camera in glasses attached to a computer, attached

to his brain.

His Neural implants came at a cost, and he had violent seizures following the surgery.

Now his is able to see outlines and shapes… which of course isn't perfect, but has opened

up a small fraction of a world he could previously not see.

As research develops, he may one day be able to see more.

Finally, at number one….

While this human machine hybrid may not yet be alive, we have half human, half electronic

cell tissue….

In 2012, Scientists at Harvard University unveiled cyborg tissue.

The synthetic skin is part living, part electronics….The scientists involved said they wanted to merge

natural and electronic in such a way that becomes difficult to determine where the tissue

ends and the electronics begin.

So…perhaos we are one step closer to truly conceiving a true cyborg.

Wow…so that was the top 10 human machine hybrids.

What a time to be alive!

Would you want to be part machine?

If so, what machine part would you go for?

OUT etc…

Thanks for watching to the end.

Why not check out our Top 10 Jobs that Robots Will Take Over…or our Top 10 future cities

being built right now.

For more infomation >> Top 10 Human-Machine Hybrids - Duration: 7:30.

-------------------------------------------

Amber Says What: Super Bowl Edition - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> Amber Says What: Super Bowl Edition - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

The Real Story Of The Civil Rights Movement | AJ+ - Duration: 9:45.

You've probably heard people make comparisons between the United States in

States in the 1960s... "Get out of that pool!"

and the U.S. today. "Don't shoot! Don't shoot!" "Black lives matter!

There've been street protests, a spotlight on policing and a national discussion about race, equality and equity.

Today, more than ever, we see pundits and politicians using the legacy of the civil rights movement and

and its icons as fodder to criticize social movements ... like Black Lives Matter. "That's

the whole message that I think Dr. King had to present, and I think he would be

appalled that we are elevating some lives above others."

Jeffrey Lord: "Think of President Trump as the Martin Luther King of healthcare."

Symone Sanders: "Oh, Jeffrey, Jeffrey." What happens when people neuter the

legacy of the civil rights movement and then use

that sanitized version to critique today's activism? . I'm Imaeyen. And today

AJ+ we're exploring the true history of the civil rights era, and how

the people we lionize – like MLK, Rosa Parks and Muhammad Ali –

were much bolder, riskier and threatening to the power dynamic

than we've been taught.

We've basically been getting a PG version of the civil rights movement. "The

men who organized the rally walked with springing steps toward the speaker stand."

"They moved with good humor, laughter and song." So much of the civil rights movement

looked more this: tense, violent and life-threatening.

And the go-to face when we talk about this time is Martin Luther King Jr.'s.

The reverend is arguably the movement's most well-known leader. But

But the truth is that he was just one person in a movement with differing ideologies for achieving

racial justice and equity – goals that relied heavily on the work and

and sacrifices of black women, whose contributions have been largely

overlooked. We'll talk more about that a little later. For now, you should know

that Martin Luther King Jr. was much more than a symbol for nonviolence.

And his efforts weren't warmly received or supported by the nation's majority, as

as Professor John Powell explains: "Dr. King, when he was alive, was extremely

unpopular. People were against most of his marches. Even the church was against

him. So he was going into very strong headwinds." While today the majority of

Americans say they believe the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a good thing, at

the time it didn't have much support from the masses. A 1963 Gallup Poll

found 60% of Americans had an unfavorable view of Martin Luther King Jr.'s

March on Washington. That's where he delivered his historic "I Have a Dream" speech.

You know, the one we so often honor today and use to emphasize the

the United States' ideals. King's speeches were way more radical than we choose to

remember. In fact, he was working on a sermon called

"Why America May Go to Hell" the day he died. And King's low approval rating was

not only because he was so critical of the way society functions, but also that

he was part of a larger movement, registering black voters and organizing

sit-ins at segregated restaurants. None of which were the "right" way to advocate

for these causes, according to critics. If that criticism sounds familiar to you,

it's because pundits have used the same critiques about the Black Lives

Matter movement. And sometimes they even invoke King's memory to do the work.

For example, Alex Jones' program posted a segment called "MLK Supports Trump from the Grave."

King's legacy is so closely tied with politics that an important point

often gets misplaced in our collective memory of him: his critique of capitalism.

In a letter to his wife, Coretta, he wrote,

This was not isolated to one letter, either. King often spoke about how alleviating poverty

was important to the fight for justice. For example, in 1965 at Ebenezer Baptist Church in

Atlanta he said,

But when we put his Washington "I Have a Dream" speech on repeat, it's easy to

forget all the ways he fought against injustices on multiple fronts.

He was also against the Vietnam War and U.S. imperialism. He once said that the U.S. government

was the "greatest purveyor of violence in the world today" and compared the war in

Vietnam to the German concentration camps. "The Reverend Martin Luther King was a social

justice religious worker, a warrior for radical justice and inclusion. When people

say this is an extreme position, he would say it's OK to be extreme if you're extreme in favor

favor of love." And let's not forget the end to this story.

Because Martin Luther King did actually die for what he believed in.

He threatened the status quo to the extent that he was assassinated.

Another important figure in the civil rights movement, and one of the few recognized women,

is Rosa Parks. She's widely described in the media like this: "Through her quiet elegance..."

"This quiet 42-year-old..." "Rosa Parks. An everyday American that changed the course of history."

The Rosa Parks story is often told as if it were an … accident. That a coincidental chain of events –

her being tired after a long day of work, her fatigue leading unexpectedly to her arrest –

led to the desegregation of the bus system. This was no accident. She was not just a woman who was

simply weary and on her way home from work. She was not just a seamstress.

"There's sort of a false image of a woman. She's quiet, diminutive, you know, she's a little

bit timid. That's not who she was. She was a fighter. She was fierce."And guess what?

That historic photo of her on the bus is staged.

Rumors were being spread of Parks being a Communist and a Mexican.

Depicting her as a fragile, everyday woman was a way for organizers to

get the public to sympathize with her experience, since an outspoken black

activist would have been a harder pill to swallow. That's all-star PR. Parks was an activist.

She worked for the NAACP for years and investigated

investigated sexual assaults of black people by white men. Her bus protest was deliberate.

It was part of an ongoing effort to desegregate the bus system. Not only was

Parks not the only person to refuse to move from her seat, it was also not the

the first time she had done so. The very same driver that had her arrested had kicked her off his bus before.

off his bus before. And after that famous bus protest, she continued her political activism for decades.

We've talked about faces synonymous with the civil rights movement.

But there's one man who some don't recognize for his

dedication to equality and equity. Muhammad Ali literally gave up the best

best boxing years of his career, and what the nation remembers is a whitewashed

version of the world's most influential athlete. "Muhammad Ali is remembered today,

I think, with his political teeth largely extracted. People speak about him in

terms of being this figure of reconciliation. Almost like a Buddha-type figure,

someone whose silent aura, people, particularly white people, feel

good about themselves. But the Ali that became revered in the latter years of his

life was a much different Ali than the one from his height.

The younger Ali spoke openly, boldly, loudly about the experience of being a

black man in a racist society, about being a Muslim and about his strong beliefs

on injustices throughout the country.

"Since we helped build America to be – 50 of the richest states in America,

fought all the American wars to help maintain and uphold the government, why not should

we have some of the land where we can build and construct?" Quite simply, he made

lots of people, especially white people, really uncomfortable.

He said he changed his name from Cassius Clay to Muhammad Ali to denounce

the oppression white Christian culture has had on black people. Like Martin Luther

King, he vehemently opposed the Vietnam War. He was sentenced to five years in

prison for saying no to the draft – a sentence that was later overturned. But he

lost his boxing license because of it. "My conscience don't let me go shoot my brother, or some

darker people, or some poor hungry people in the mud. Shoot them

them for what them for what? They never called me n*gger, they never lynched me, they never

robbed me of my nationality, raped, killed my mother and father." Ali retired in

in 1981, but he really wasn't embraced by mainstream America until he lit the torch

at the 1996 Atlanta Summer Olympic Games. At that point, he was an older man –

with Parkinson's disease and showing symptoms.

"The mainstream media and politicians like Bill Clinton and Orrin Hatch only embraced Muhammad Ali

lost the power of speech. And once he wasn't able to use the gift of gab to

decry U.S. empire, to speak out for Palestinian rights – which is something he

believed in very strongly – once he was unable to do that, then this incredibly

popular person was free for them to embrace. America found it easy to love Ali

once he was silenced. So what does that mean for the future of Colin Kaepernick?

So why is it important to remember King was critical of capitalism, Parks was no ordinary seamstress and Ali

wasn't beloved by the majority in his prime? Because by uplifting them as

sanitized icons, we're able to ignore the great racial disparities that continue

to exist today. Understanding what these icons stood for helps contextualize the

the commitment many of our generation's leaders and movements are making today.

"I think what the politicians and the elites actually figured out toward

the late '60s, early '70s, , is that we can coopt the civil rights movement. We can

embrace King but still maintain segregated schools, for example, segregated

neighborhoods. We can still maintain segregated boardrooms."

For more infomation >> The Real Story Of The Civil Rights Movement | AJ+ - Duration: 9:45.

-------------------------------------------

5 WWE Wrestlers Who Retired Too Early - Duration: 8:52.

For more infomation >> 5 WWE Wrestlers Who Retired Too Early - Duration: 8:52.

-------------------------------------------

John McCain Is Done – Just Got Exactly What He Deserves. - Duration: 1:53.

John McCain Is Done Just Got Exactly What He Deserves.

Arizona Senator John McCain has spent the past year betraying the Republican Party by

constantly attacking President Donald Trump.

McCain once gain tried to bash the president on Friday, but it didn't end well for him.

Mediaite reported that McCain just released a statement that effectively slams Trump for

the controversial Devin Nunes memo on alleged FISA investigative abuses.

The statement came out at virtually the same time as the release of the memo, which showed

that the FBI and Department of Justice engaged in serious misconduct against Trump.

Despite the horrifying revelations in the memo, McCain chose to take the liberal side

against Trump.

The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests no

party's, no president's, only Putin's, McCain said.

The American people deserve to know all of the facts surrounding Russia's ongoing efforts

to subvert our democracy, which is why Special Counsel Mueller's investigation must proceed

unimpeded.

Our nation's elected officials, including the president, must stop looking at this investigation

through the warped lens of politics and manufacturing partisan sideshows.

If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin's job for him.

Twitter users, however, immediately let McCain know that he had gone too far:

SHARE this story if you think John McCain should RESIGN!

What do you think about this?

Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> John McCain Is Done – Just Got Exactly What He Deserves. - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

The Nunes Memo vs. the Schiff Memo | NYT - Duration: 1:24.

It's a tale of two memos.

One from Republican Representative Devin Nunes.

And one from Democratic Representative Adam Schiff.

First, the Nunes memo.

In 2016, the F.B.I. and Justice Department

applied for a warrant to wiretap a former Trump campaign adviser.

The now declassified Nunes memo

asserts that officials relied on information

from former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele,

without adequately explaining to the judge

that Democrats had financed the research.

Trump's allies say the Nunes memo shows

that the F.B.I.'s Russia investigation

was politically biased in its early stages.

President Trump cleared the way for its release.

Democrats, including Adam Schiff,

have proposed their own currently classified memo

at the same time

so the public can judge both together.

It apparently explains why various points in the Nunes memo

are wrong or misleading.

For example, sources say the information from Steele

was only one thread in a tapestry of evidence

from various sources that the Nunes memo ignored,

exaggerating its relative importance.

But Republicans made the Nunes memo public

without simultaneously making the rebuttal Schiff memo public, too.

It seems to be an attempt to shift focus away

from the Russia investigation itself

and toward what they're trying to argue is the real scandal:

the investigators.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét