Waching daily Jul 24 2018

♩

Hey, Squeaks!

How about we have a little snack?

I've got something in mind that I think you'll really like!

This snack comes from a cow, but it's not milk!

Though it's actually something that's made from milk.

[Squeaks squeaks] That's true, we've made butter from milk before … but it's not that, either.

[Squeaks squeaks!]

Yep!

It's cheese!

This is Swiss cheese!

It's called that because it was originally made in Switzerland, which is a country in Europe.

But now Swiss cheese is made all over the world, including here in the United States.

You might notice something about this cheese that you don't normally see in other foods: it has all those holes!

Most other types of cheese don't have holes in them, so Swiss cheese is pretty special.

Cheese experts actually call these holes "eyes," which is kind of funny because they're totally different from our eyes.

So why does Swiss cheese have "eyes"?

Is it because Squeaks has been nibbling at it?

[Squeaks squeaks]

I'm just kidding, Squeaks!

The holes in Swiss cheese aren't made by animals!

Let's get to the HOLE story!

Get it, Squeaks?

Hole?

[Squeaks laughs]

The really cool thing about cheese is that it's actually made with germs!

Yeah, that's right: germs!

Another word that scientists use to talk about these germs is bacteria, and there are some kinds of bacteria that can make us sick.

But the bacteria in cheese is safe!

Cheesemakers add different types of bacteria to milk, along with some other stuff, to make different types of cheeses.

And there are so many!

Maybe you're a fan of mozzarella?

That's the kind you can usually find on pizza.

And I know we're big fans of pizza!

Or maybe you like cheddar cheese?

Cheddar makes an excellent grilled cheese sandwich!

And there are soooo many more!

Anyway, back to Swiss!

I know you've been waiting to find out the HOLE story about those holes!

[Squeaks squeaks]

I guess that was a CHEESY joke!

The bacteria that cheesemakers add to Swiss cheese eat some of the cheese, but that's not exactly what causes the holes.

When the bacteria eat the milk, they cause a reaction.

A reaction is when two things mix together, and sometimes they create a third thing!

In this case, when the bacteria eat the milk, they create … bubbles!

Those bubbles take up room in the cheese, and when they eventually pop, we're left with holes.

Totally weird, right?

But here's the thing: The Swiss cheese we eat today doesn't have as many holes in it as it used to, and sometimes it ends up not having any holes at all!

So what's different now about the way we make Swiss cheese now?

We're still using the same bacteria.

Scientists think there are less holes these days because the bacteria isn't doing ALL the work in making them.

Little bits of hay might be helping the process along!

So what's hay?

And why is it in cheese?

Hay is something you'll find on a lot of farms.

It's dried out grass that's used to feed animals, like cows and sheep and other animals that make milk!

So little tiny bits of hay might accidentally get into the buckets used for collecting milk.

Then, scientists think the bubbles from the bacteria form around those little bits of hay.

So the hay is important for creating the bubbles that make the holes when they pop.

Now that cheesemakers have more modern ways of making cheese, hay doesn't get in the buckets anymore.

So that might be why there aren't so many holes anymore, even though the bacteria is the same.

And there you have it! The mystery is solved: hay and bacteria work together as a team to make bubbles that leave holes when they pop!

So the holes definitely aren't made by mice or rats or robot rats eating the cheese!

Thanks for joining us!

If you want to keep learning and exploring with Squeaks and me, hit the subscribe button, and don't forget to check us out on the YouTube Kids app.

We'll see you next time, here at the Fort!

♩

For more infomation >> Why Does Some Cheese Have Holes? - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Zosia Fights MS - Duration: 2:01.

My first relapse happened in May.

Three months later, there was another one.

It was placed high up the neck

around segment C6

and paralised left half of my body.

In the middle of September

I cried from joy that I was able to move

my left index finger by a milimeter.

By the end of October

stood up for the first time.

A year later,

Medical Committee agreed to

perform a stem cell transplant.

A very malignant and fast progressing case.

Five months of my life wasted,

six chemos,

lots of hats, wigs, turbans.

The illness luckily slowed down.

Three years later,

and I am still learning to walk

To this day,

I have weak and shaking hands

which drop everything.

I need help

with most basic tasks.

I am not agile anymore.

I will need rehabilitation

for the rest of my life

because there is no cure.

But we're getting there

last stretch.

I only need funds.

Can you help me?

For more infomation >> Zosia Fights MS - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

Прогноз руны дня на сегодня 25 июля 2018 года от Наталии Рунной #рунныймаг - Duration: 2:19.

For more infomation >> Прогноз руны дня на сегодня 25 июля 2018 года от Наталии Рунной #рунныймаг - Duration: 2:19.

-------------------------------------------

Shortage of homes reported in Central Florida - Duration: 2:00.

For more infomation >> Shortage of homes reported in Central Florida - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

"Лесник. Своя земля". 24 серия - Duration: 48:05.

For more infomation >> "Лесник. Своя земля". 24 серия - Duration: 48:05.

-------------------------------------------

fun with greenscreens - Duration: 28:55.

For more infomation >> fun with greenscreens - Duration: 28:55.

-------------------------------------------

Does Having a Relapse Make You A Failure? - Duration: 4:55.

InstaAdvice with LikeKristen

Hi and welcome to InstaAdvice with Kristen. This is a new series I'm

starting in collaboration with my Instagram account. Basically, Instagram

has this new question "thing" where you can say "Ask me a question!" So I decided

to make a weekly series where I answer some of your guys's questions. Each video

will be very short. Just a little snippet and answering your guys's questions

because you have so many amazing questions that I just can't answer on

Instagram. So if you'd like to be part of this Instagram series go and follow me

on Instagram. Today's question is a pretty serious one. Does relapse mean you

failed? And by relapse, meaning doing a bad coping skill once you haven't been

doing that coping skill for a while. By coping skill I mean self-harm, eating

disorder, binge eating, smoking, drinking, anything that causes you to feel bad.

Basically. In my experience it is self-harm and I think a lot of you guys do

you suffer with self harm and that's why you're at my channel because I have that

experience as well. If you don't know me I have been suffering with self harm for

at least 10 years and am in self-harm recovery for a year almost a year and a half. High-five!

The last relapse that I had I did feel like I failed because it was six months

and I was like "I cannot believe I did that. I cannot believe I hurt myself. I

cannot believe I didn't use a different coping skill." You know, so much pity on

myself, so depressed that I did that, and just so negative on myself. Someone in my

life I was talking to and this is the perspective that they put in my head and

I really hope it helps you. Say you relapsed. It's been a week, two weeks, a

year, two years, 10 years, I don't know what your experience is but for me let's

say it was six months. I didn't do anything for six months. I was using

really healthy coping skills. I was doing great and then one day I just wasn't

doing great, I wasn't feeling good, and I relapsed. Should I feel like a failure?

In short, no. You're not a failure. Never call yourself a failure because then

it's over. The depression won, the eating disorder won, whatever won. You're never a

failure. I want you to think about all those times when you wanted to do that

behavior. You wanted to hit yourself, you wanted to hurt yourself, you wanted to

drink, you wanted to smoke, you want it to binge. Think about all those times when

you wanted to do that and think about the coping skills you used

to get yourself out of it. Maybe it was a day, that's still valid. Maybe it was a

week, that's still valid. Maybe it was a year and you had multiple times that

year when you wanted to do that but you didn't because you had your coping

skills and you got through it.Think about all those times. I want you to just

like sit here and think about that. That's a lot of times and those times

you learned that these coping skills do help. Now I want you to think about the

relapse that just happened. You've made it six months. You made it two days.

You've made it two years and you did not relapse. Good for you! Good for you for using

those coping skills. Good for you for talking to somebody. Good for you. I don't

care if it was a week. I don't care if it was a day. I don't care if it was two

years. You were strong enough to make it that far

and this relapse does not make you a failure. This relapse is to help you

visualize what the future is going to be like. Now, it's so easy to fall into the

hole of relapse. Of continuously doing whatever you're doing because "Hey, I

already relapsed. What's the point?" Hey, the point is you're gonna get into

recovery. You are going to fight this mental health problem that you are

facing because you're strong enough to do that. I want you to think about the

relapse. I want you to think about why did I relapse? Why didn't I go to my coping

skills? Be mindful about what happened. Did someone talk to you? Did something

happen? Did you have a stressful life event? What was the thing or what was the

trigger that triggered you into this relapse? Now, you know why you relapsed.

You know what coping skills that would have worked. You need to be mindful about

this trigger in the future. When this happens again you need to be mindful

about "Hey, last time I did relapse because this trigger in my life and I

need to be better. I need to work on it. I need to call that person. I need to call

the crisis line. I need to talk to my doctor. I need to talk to my friend. I

need to journal. I need to take a hot bath..." whatever helps you, you need to do

that. Relapse doesn't mean you failed. Relapse is all part of the recovery

process. When I was trying to recover from self-harm I would only go a week

and then I would go two weeks and then I'll go three weeks and then I would go

month and then I would go two months. The longer you are in recovery the easier

it's going to be to like cope with these triggers and to do that you need to get

into therapy, you need to get into a support system, you need to talk to

your doctor. I have videos down below to help you with that if you want. I really

hope this video helped you. I really hope I answered your question. If you any

other questions about relapse just put them down below and I could put them in

the next video. If you would like to be part of InstaAdvice with LikeKritsten

step 1) follow me on Instagram and every single

Sunday I'm going to be asking you guys for questions. Hope you guys enjoyed this

video. I love you guys, please stay safe, and I'll see you guys next time!

Bye guys!

For more infomation >> Does Having a Relapse Make You A Failure? - Duration: 4:55.

-------------------------------------------

How to Improve Listening Skills - Duration: 6:36.

In this video, we're going to go after listening skills.

So let's unpack the details.

I'd like to share a quote with you from the famous writer Ernest

Hemingway. He said, "When people talk. Listen

completely. Most people never listen. In this video, we're going to talk about

improving your listening skills. The benefits for improved listening are

almost endless. It helps you develop a greater appreciation for other people.

Helps you learn and understand more about the world. And it helps you

communicate more effectively overal.l Because, if you're listening more

effectively, when you speak your messages are much more likely to hit their target.

So in this video my overall point is that listening is the best way to

instantly improve your communication. And I'm going to share with you three tips

to help you improve your listening. The first tip is to show other people that

they matter with your listening. Now these tips are all mindset tips, mainly

but in your mind before you enter a conversation, if you can commit to

showing people that they matter, it's going to come across in the way you

behave. Now when you show them that they matter, what you're doing is you're

taking your mind off of yourself for a little while and you're focusing

entirely on them and what they are saying. And when you're showing people

that they matter, you know what this looks like because you have seen other

people listen to you very carefully. When people are listening to you carefully

they're giving you their undivided attention. They're literally leaning

forward in their chairs. They're making solid eye contact. they're caring about

what you're saying through their facial expressions. That's what showing people

that they matter looks like. Now we could break this down into lots of behavioral

steps and I'll probably at some point develop a whole entire course on just

listening but in my experience if you can change your mindset and think in

this conversation I'm going to show them that they matter.

Most of the nonverbal behaviors will come across that way. so that's the first

tip. Show them that they matter. Second tip is to listen to understand, not to

respond. You want to listen with an open mind, purely to absorb what the

other person is saying. It doesn't mean you're going to agree with everything

they say but you're listening just to understand, not to respond. See what

happens is is when we're listening to respond, we tend to cue up our next

comment in the back of our mind. And we're forming that thought and we're not

really paying attention to what the person is saying in the first place.

That's called a rebuttal [tendency] response and it leads to very poor listening. You're not

going to even comprehend very much if your thinking about what you'll say next.

You don't want to have this rebuttal tendency where you're going to argue

against it. Make your own point. Form your own thought. If you're thinking of that,

it's gonna throw you off track. Instead what you want to do is listen with an

open mind completely just to understand. Some people would say well what if

then they asked me what do you think you can always say something like well give

me a second let me think about that. And then form your thought and respond. It's

a classy move actually in a conversation to give something that they've said some

extra thought before you respond. That's the second tip listen to

understand not to respond. And the third tip is to show the speaker that you're

following along with them. And the two ways to do that are by asking follow-up

or clarifying questions and another way is just to respond in a short little

statement that indicates that you're following along with them. I was

practicing this style of listening to show my wife when we first got married

that I really was paying attention to what she was saying. During dinner

time I said okay during dinner today I am going to listen to whatever she

says I'm gonna really show her that I'm following along. And she happened to be

during that dinner talking about broccoli. And so I was doing my job as a

listener and I was asking follow-up questions. And I was

saying things like oh how do you like your broccoli cooked? And she was saying

well not really steamed or boiled but mostly I like it fried up really hot in

a pan so that the edges get a bit brown and crispy. And I would say okay that's

brown and crispy. I see that. Do you like the flowerettes about the size that are

on your plate right now or bigger or smaller? She said well really I like the

flowerettes of broccoli chopped up very small. That's the best way to eat a

little tiny bite-sized thing. And I kept listening and asking questions and

showing her that I was following along like this. And she got really excited all

of a sudden talking about broccoli. So that's what good listening will do to a

conversation. And at one point she even said like hold on a second. What are you

doing right now? Why are we so engaged and why do you like broccoli so much all

of a sudden in this conversation? And I said well I'm just working on my

listening. And as funny as it sounds, she really did appreciate the depth and

detail that I was caring about her thoughts right there. So you want to

listen and show them that you're following along and it'll lead to a

wonderful conversation. In summary, listening is the best way to instantly

improve your communication overall. Your homework assignment for this video is

really simple. The very next conversation you have, I

want you to listen completely to what the other person is saying using these

three tips that we talked about and watch what happens. I guarantee you it'll

be a very different kind of conversation that you're used to having. And I would

like to finish with a quotation from the book of James, "Be quick to listen and

slow to speak." See you in the next video.

I hope you found that video on listening

skills helpful. You may not realize it, but you are in the middle of a five-part

mini course on essential professional communication skills. I will put a link

to all five lessons in the description below this video as well as a link below

the video that links to the Quick Guide, essentially a PDF that summarizes all

the tips for all five videos and then gives links to each of the videos so you

can get directly to them there those are all free and I encourage you to check

them out so let's get into the next video about Building Positive Relationships.

For more infomation >> How to Improve Listening Skills - Duration: 6:36.

-------------------------------------------

COMIC CON 2018 *RECAP* - Duration: 19:08.

So Comic Con 2018 was back this year, surprise!

And this year to be perfectly honest wasn't as crazy as previous years, like there weren't

as many announcements or trailers.

The MCU sat this year out, there was no new X-Men stuff, no publicly released Sony stuff,

but hey there was certainly still enough stuff to make a video on.

Two things to note, one, there are links down below to every trailer I talk about, and two,

I almost definitely missed something.

Like 99%, cuz there is just so much going on at Comic Con that I'm sure something

slipped through the cracks.

So sorry about that, but I think I got most of it.

Alright, I've divided all these announcements and such into Marvel/DC/and other, and lets

start off as usual with the other, which I'm gonna speed round a little cuz some of these

as you'll see, I don't have a lot to say about.

First up the Predator had a new poster and some new footage shown, the movie's very

close so not much to say there.

I've heard a lot of mixed things on this movie, I think it looks pretty awesome, and

I have total confidence in Shane Black.

Then there was some behind the scenes footage shown for It Chapter 2 showing the Losers

Club kids reuniting at a Chinese Restaurant, there was more footage shown from the Nun

which by the way based on that first trailer looks just absolutely terrifying.

There was Halloween panel where the highlight was a fan telling Jamie Lee Curtis that Halloween

saved his life during a home invasion, which is a pretty sweet video if you haven't seen

it.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer is getting a reboot courtesy of Joss Whedon, sure, never watched

it.

There was first look at the new Doctor Who, and yes, I'm aware it's the Doctor, not

Doctor Who, please don't lose your mind at me in the comments.

Walking Dead season 9 trailer, Star Trek Discovery season 2 trailer, a Steven Universe movie

was announced, Voltron season 7 trailer, the thing that all these have in common unfortunately

is that I don't watch them.

But if you do, hey link down below to all of that stuff.

I hear Star Trek Discovery is great though.

Then there was a trailer for the new show Nightflyers, which is based on a book by George

R.R. Martin.

It looks pretty good, but I hate the fact that I was kind of put off by this because

of the Cloverfield Paradox.

It's frustrating because I know it'll most probably be better than the Cloverfield

Paradox, but because it looks quite similar I just instantly went, ugh I don't wanna

go through that again.

Kind of a similar situation with The Emoji Movie and Wreck It Ralph 2.

There was also a trailer for the Dragon Prince, which is the new thing from the people behind

Avatar the Last Airbender.

It's a very short teaser but didn't really impress me, gotta be honest.

Also there's a live action Kim Possible movie coming from Disney and we got our first

look at it today, great.

Didn't really watch Kim Possible that much as a kid, but I played that Gameboy or DS

or whatever system game for it, that was fun.

Now finally onto shows I do actually watch, there was a Breaking Bad reunion panel, which

was awesome to see everyone back together.

Also Walt and Jesse are apparently gonna show up not in this season but at some point in

Better Call Saul before it ends.

So hell yes to that, I need to catch up, I'm still in season 2.

There was a teaser for Stranger Things season 3, which was like an 80s mall advertisement

with probably my favorite Stranger Things character in it, great.

There was a panel for Archer, where they revealed the next season will be called Archer: 1999

and will be in space, because of course it will.

I'm watching season 9 now and I'm loving it so far.

There was also a Brooklyn Nine-Nine panel, which I'm almost done with season 3 and

it has quickly become one of my favorite shows, almost up there with the Office.

Then there was a little Star Wars news, there are going to be some new books focusing on

the prequel era and then the Clone Wars tv show was saved, which I've never watched

but everyone seemed overjoyed by, so that was really nice to see.

Then there was a little Bumblebee news, new footage and new poster and some reveals that

I guess could be considered a little spoilery, maybe not really.

If you don't want anything about this movie ruined for you, like some locations and a

possible cameo, just mute this video now and unmute it when this symbol disappears.

Five four three two one, alright, so apparently the movie is gonna have some scenes on Cybertron,

which is cool I guess, ties it more into the other Transformers movies, and also apparently

the footage they showed had a holographic Optimus Prime communicating with Bumblebee.

I said that might be a cameo, but maybe he plays a large-ish role, I don't know.

Alright, all done there.

They showed some Lego Movie 2 footage which had Lego Harley Quinn in it, cool cool.

And now we get to the actual big trailers from the "other section".

First up, Glass, the third film in the Unbreakable Split trilogy.

I haven't seen Unbreakable yet but I have actually seen Split, and I really liked it,

especially James McAvoy, so I was excited to see more of him here.

Overall I think I'll have more to say and be more excited once I've seen Unbreakable,

like to people who love that movie seeing those characters return now must be mind blowing,

but to a person like myself who's just seen Split, this still looks pretty cool.

Also the cinematography looks pretty amazing.

Then we got a trailer to the sequel to Godzilla, Godzilla: King of the Monsters, which looks….interesting?

I have some mixed feelings on it.

I like seeing Millie Bobby Brown in more stuff, apparently a lot of people hate her, I don't

really know why, I just know that she's great on Stranger Things so I'm happy to

see her in more big mainstream stuff.

The rest of the cast looks really great, they got Charles Dance to say a Game of Thrones-sounding

line, great.

Nearly all of these visuals look amazing, a lot of the action looks cool and I will

say, despite this also being a complaint of mine in a sec, I am intrigued by the idea

of there being like tons of monsters in this and all of them fighting or working together

or whatever, but at the same time I fear this might have jumped the shark a little?

Like the first Godzilla, people have complaints about it, I liked it and also liked the grounded

aspect of….most of it.

And this looks like it could be slipping a little more into Pacific Rim type territory,

which I know some people might like, but then It think why not watch Pacific Rim?

This could be more it's own thing.

I mean one or two new monsters sure but a whole big universe?

I don't know, I guess they wanna make this cinematic Godzilla Kong universe, and look

it could be very fun and interesting, it just has me a little cautious.

Also this shot in particular just so reminded me of like an Independence Day type disaster

movie, and as much as I like Independence Day I'm kind of over total disaster movies

at this point.

Like I know Godzilla is gonna knock down some buildings but like an apocalypse?

I don't know.

It looks cool, hoping for the best, not super insanely excited.

And then finally for the other, the newest trailer for Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of

Grindelwald.

I'm a huge Harry Potter fan, I feel like I don't get a chance to talk about that

that much on this channel.

But like, before the MCU this was my favorite franchise of all time, I've read all the

books multiple times I've seen all the movies multiple times, I grew up with it, I love

this world.

All that said, I've been a little eh on this movie.

The first few pieces of promo stuff haven't wowed me and I thought the first movie was

pretty good but wasn't amazing or anything.

But this….this trailer might've been my favorite thing from Comic Con this year.

I am well on board for this movie now.

Sure this did play on the nostalgia a bit, what with the Boggart scene and Nicolas Flamel

showing up at the end and I'm pretty sure I spotted the Mirror of Erised in there, but

hey that nostalgia worked on me, really made me smile.

And the rest of this just looks super fun and whimsical.

The first Fantastic Beasts, a problem I had with it was that besides the parts in the

briefcase where Newt was touring around the beasts, it was sort of dark and dull and I

guess not really that whimsical, but this looks like just all of that.

Plus making Newt's story maybe somewhat more secondary to a grander story more in

the forefront this time around with Dumbledore I think is a great idea.

Still loving Jude Law as Dumbledore, and they've surprisingly put quite a big focus on Johnny

Depp in this trailer, and also at Comic Con itself.

You'd think they'd try to play that down but nope, he's a very big part of this.

Look besides all the personal stuff around him, confirmed or alleged, just as an actor,

I haven't really loved anything he's done in a while, but hey maybe this can turn things

around.

If he isn't actually a terrible person in real life, which he very well might be.

But overall, it just looks like a very exciting fun time that expands on this universe that

I already really love.

That ending also gave me chills.

So yeah, count me in as very excited now.

Now moving on to Marvel, where again, the majority of the Marvel stuff didn't really

show this year.

But the little that we got was pretty good….I guess.

Cloak & Dagger got renewed for season 2, which is good I guess cuz people seem to like that

show.

Cloak & Dagger's actually the first MCU property that I haven't watched, cuz after

Runaways I was like, yeah that was good, but it's not something I really felt compelled

to go back to and this seemed a bit similar, but hey let me know down below if Cloak & Dagger

is amazing.

The Gifted got a trailer for season 2, I was not expecting that cuz the first season looked

very mediocre to me but apparently it was good enough to warrant a second season.

Deadpool 2 had an extreme supercut shown for all the fans with more violence and jokes

and some of those alternate end credits scenes, for example one involving Baby Hitler which

I won't spoil if you don't know what it is.

There was this awesome new Infinity War poster.

There was a new trailer for that PS4 Spider-Man game which looks awesome, and Iron Fist season

2 had a trailer, which I guess was the only MCU footage we saw this year.

It's impossible to say if this will be good based on this teaser, since it's less than

a minute, the main takeaway from this for me was the release date, September 7, which

I was very sure was going to go to Daredevil season 3, but nope, it's going to Iron Fist,

cuz Marvel Netflix just won't give me the one show I'm actually dying to see more

of.

Give us Daredevil season 3 already Marvel, please!

As far as this one, the Iron Fist episode was one of my favorite parts of Luke Cage

season 2 (review coming sometime), but I feel like he really works better as a supporting

character who sort've just pops up from time to time.

A whole other season, I don't know hopefully they've learned from season 1.

I'd really just rather see a Luke Cage Iron Fist team up show but whatever.

Also Misty Knight's gonna be in it, great, I loved her in Luke Cage season 2.

Then Sony had a bunch of stuff that the public didn't get to see any of, which I guess is

fair.

There was some new Into the Spider-Verse footage shown, apparently with new heroes in it.

As a lot of people predicted and hoped, this is just gonna go crazy and have tons of different

Spider-people in it, including Spider-Ham, which is amazing.

God I'm so excited for that movie, it looks incredible.

And then Venom had some more footage shown, which we'll probably be seeing within the

week?

We actually already have this leaked still from it, so enjoy that.

There were a few takeaways from this, one, Venom is gonna be huge in this, like maybe

a little under Colossus sized from Deadpool.

He also makes like giant axes out of his hands, which does sound pretty amazing.

Two, this is gonna be really violent, apparently.

And three, the villain is gonna be another symbiote, Riot, played by Riz Ahmed.

Which a, is sort've disappointing that it's not gonna be Carnage, and b, even if it was

Carnage, another symbiote is a risky way to go, cuz I don't want this to just turn into

Iron Man vs Iron Monger Hulk vs Abomination Black Panther vs Killmonger CGI two very similar

characters punching each other, oh and they're slimy and intertwining so it'll be even more

nonsensical.

Also Tom Hardy hinted that he'd like to work with Tom Holland in the future, and a

lot of people took that as Spidey's in this movie, but I seriously doubt that.

It'd be really awesome if he was, but Marvel Studios seems to be trying to distance themselves

from this.

Also if you've seen this pic going around and think it's real, yeah it's not.

It's very much not.

And now, finally, DC.

Who clearly won Comic Con, in the same way that a person would win a race if half of

the other runners didn't show up and the other half showed up with two broken legs.

First up, Teen Titans Go to the Movies had a screening and apparently it's good!

Yay.

And then speaking of Teen Titans, but on a much grittier and cooler and edgy note, there's

the Titans tv show for the new DC streaming service, starring the very….actor Brenton

Thwaites.

Now I'll be honest, I was kinda rooting for this show.

A DC streaming service sounds like a cool idea, and these are some good characters,

and DC's TV shows are generally quite good (at least the ones I watch), so I went into

this quite hopeful.

And I came out of it….less hopeful.

On a scale of superhero TV I'd say it looks better than Inhumans but worse than Iron Fist.

The one thing this has going for me is not really a good thing at all, but the unintentionally

funny, which sometimes can be even better than something actually funny.

The way this show seems to be trying to be so dark and edgy is kind of hilarious, it

seems like a 13 year olds idea of what a really edgy Titans show would be.

Brenton Thwaites beating up some guys and saying fuck Batman has not once failed to

make me burst out laughing every time I've watched this trailer.

Besides that aspect though, the rest of this just looks poorly made.

I mean it's just a trailer, but the effects and costumes don't look great to me (besides

Nightwing's, that costume actually looks decent), and the whole thing looks quite cliche

and boring.

The dialogue is also pretty bad from what we see here.

I'll probably skip this one unless everyone says it's actually really good or a huge trainwreck

that you just have to see.

Speaking of these characters….I think?

There was a trailer for the new season of Young Justice, called Outsiders.

Everyone loves that show, maybe I'll jump on board soon.

There was also a trailer for the Flash season 5, which I started watching and then stopped

because I realized I probably don't want all of season 4 spoiled for me.

Cuz yeah, I haven't caught up with The Flash season 4 yet, sue me.

I just finished the episode where they go to a strip club, that's where I'm at.

I'm working on it.

And a similar situation for Arrow season 7, there was a trailer and I didn't watch it

cuz I'm still in season 1.

Again...working on it.

Slowly.

Then there were also trailers for Legends of Tomorrow season 4, Supergirl season 4,

Black Lightning season 2, and Krypton season 2, where they use Tweets from fans instead

of critic reviews, which was a little hilarious sometimes.

Anyway, yeah, if you like DCTV, then this was a good day for you.

Then there was the announcement that we're getting a live action Star Girl series, who

I vaguely remember from that episode of Justice League where they go to the center of the

Earth, or something.

That was a bit of a weird one.

That's pretty much all I know about her, but hey could be fun.

Also isn't she friends with a guy in like an Iron Monger-esque suit?

Also Batwoman is coming to the Arrowverse, awesome!

Oh also DC changed it's cinematic universe's official name from DC Extended Universe to

Worlds Of DC, but come on!

I've finally gotten used to saying DCEU instead of DCCU and now you're changing

it to WODC?

Imma stick with DCEU until it becomes socially unacceptable, just putting that out there.

And now, the big DC stuff.

The movies.

Wonder Woman 84 had a quick trailer, which actually partially leaked online.

The most I saw of it was a gif on Twitter, which I won't include in this video cuz

I don't wanna risk this getting taken down, but I'll put a link to it in the description.

It's Wonder Woman in a mall lassoing a few guys, great.

I'm actually really optimistic about this movie, and hope I'll love it as much as

most people loved the first one, which I thought was pretty good but not amazing.

And then the two other big movies.

Firstly, Shazam.

We got some Entertainment Weekly covers and photos and then we actually got a trailer,

which I was hoping for but also really surprised me since this is so far away.

Then again they put out a Justice League trailer like well over a year before the movie so

I guess I should've seen that coming.

But anyway, the trailer.

When I watched it the first time, I was a little lukewarm on it, like yeah it looked

fun but not as good as I was hoping.

But the more times I watch it, the more I really enjoy it and start getting more excited

for this movie.

There's still some stuff I'm worried about, but overall, I'm actually quite pumped for

this.

Zach Levi looks like the absolute perfect choice for this.

He looks like he pulls off a kid being inside a grown man superhero body perfectly, I'm

really looking forward to that aspect.

And overall the movie looks like a lot of fun, especially the Shazam training aspect

and learning about his powers.

It looks really enjoyable and there were quite a few moments where I laughed or at least

smiled.

I had a smile on my face throughout most of this trailer.

My only gripe really is that the movie just looks and feels….cheap to me?

Like not just the costume, I know there's a huge debate over this costume and if it's

good or bad, personally it looks a little cheap to me but it's actually growing on em.

I mean the rest of the film just looks a bit like a lower budget kids movie, and this obviously

is more geared towards kids than some of the other DC movies, but I just wish it didn't

look this cheap.

Not all the time, sometimes it looks like a proper high budget cinema experience, but

occasionally it felt a little like a CW TV kinda thing.

Also not all the jokes and that kinda stuff landed, and the Billy Batson stuff looks a

lot more cliche and less interesting than the Shazam stuff to me.

Also question: so is this actually in the DCEU itself?

Like cuz we see Superman and Batman are in this world and he has like a proper Batfleck

Batarang so I guess it is.

That's pretty inconsequential, I just find it hilarious that the universe that started

like this *MoS clip* and then moved on to this *BvS clip* and was supposed to be the

super dark alternative to Marvel now is here *Shazam clip*.

But I don't have a problem with that, cuz unlike Justice League where it tried to take

characters who are dark and more importantly who in this universe have already been a certain

way and turn the tone basically on it's head, while this tone seems to fit this character

perfectly.

So hey, I'm not like beyond excited for this,--------but I'm genuinely looking forward

to it.

And finally, there was the Aquaman trailer, which I was expecting to blow my mind and

be like the crown jewel of this years Comic Con or something like that.

And for a lot of people apparently it was that.

For me, I found it actually a bit disappointing, and I know this video probably just got a

big uptick in dislikes.

There were also some posters and images and what not but the trailer, the trailer's

the big thing.

I didn't hate this or anything.

And overall I'm still excited for it because James Wan is such a good director and I have

confidence in him.

And there is stuff in here that I did like.

The city of Atlantis itself looks awesome.

That was a very Black Panther moment introducing it, but it looks really cool, and like something

I've never really seen before.

Some action also looks cool, Aquaman lifting a submarine was awesome, this shot is amazing,

--------and again, I have faith that this will actually be entertaining.

There are interesting ideas here and I think this could be really creative….possibly.

However, there's a lot of stuff that just left me a little disappointed.

For example that origin story looks like the most cliche thing in the world, like Harry

Potter or Spider-Man or any number of similar scenes where a hero discovers their powers.

And also that shark looks horrendous.

That is some terrible CGI.

Overall some of the CGI in this looks cool, and some looks really last act of Wonder Woman

last act of Justice League CGI.

Which I would've thought they would've gotten better at by now.

Also, as good of a choice as I think Jason Momoa is for this character, I gotta be honest,

I don't love this super bro version of Aquaman.

Like in Justice League, almost a little like that Titans trailer, I found it a little bit

unintentionally hilarious how cool they were trying to make Aquaman with the rock music

and the drinking and all that, like Jason Momoa is cool, you don't have to go super

over the top with it.

And now in here when he's like, I call it an ass whooping, I mean it's consistent with

the character they've set up so props for that, but I don't love that part of the

character at least.

The part where he drops down in the sub, that was genuinely cool, more stuff like that would

be great.

The story and villain look a little overdone too, like a hero comes back to earn their

right to the throne from their evil family member.

And I'm a little torn on that end final battle with this giant Lord of the Rings type

underwater battle.

Like it could devolve into just nonsense CGI battle that's not that interesting as these

superhero movies, even the great ones, sometimes do, but it could also be a really cool epic

final battle that actually feels fulfilling, which I feel like we don't get as often

as the first option and I'm really hoping we get here.

Overall, Aquaman, hoping for the best and some stuff looks cool here, but this trailer

did not blow me away like I was hoping it would.

So those were my thoughts on Comic Con this year.

What do you think of all of these announcements?

Let me know all of your thoughts down below in the comments.

While you're at it be sure to like this video, check out my Instagram and Twitter

@bhl_hudson, check out this podcast about movies and TV and whatnot I do every other

week with a friend of mine, it's called The Poorly Planned Podcast, and subscribe

for more videos like the one you just watched.

Thanks for watching and I'll see ya next time.

For more infomation >> COMIC CON 2018 *RECAP* - Duration: 19:08.

-------------------------------------------

When Fish Wore Armor - Duration: 10:19.

420 million years ago, life was definitely better down where it was wetter...under the

sea.

Dry land was still new and relatively empty.

But in the seas, life had reached a fever pitch of diversity, especially among fish.

The world's oceans teemed with sharks, primitive ray-finned fishes, hagfish, and even our very

early ancestors, the lobe-finned fish.

With such an abundance of life unfolding from 420 million to 360 million years ago, it's

no wonder that the Devonian Period is often called the Age of Fish.

But the fish that the Devonian is perhaps best known for were a little different than

the ones you and I know today.

Back then, some fish were more… medieval.

They wore armor, sometimes made of big plates, and sometimes made of interlocking scales.

And the evolution of armor may seem like an obvious adaptation for protection, especially

in the Devonian's crowded seas.

But that armor may actually have served a totally different purpose, one that many animals

still use today -- including you and me.

The earliest armored fish we have fossils of is called Sacabambaspis, a member of the

subclass known as Arandaspida.

This fish lived in the coastal waters of what's now Bolivia, during the Ordovician Period,

some 470 million years ago.

And really, it looked more like a watermelon with a tail than a fish.

It had no jaws, and no dorsal or side fins.

It was only marginally more fish-like than its earlier relatives, hagfish and conodonts,

with which it shared a common ancestor.

But what it lacked in fishiness in the front of its body it made up for with an extravagant

tail, complete with a shark-like fin and a long, scaled rod extending from the tip.

And the most distinctive feature of this fish was, of course, its armor -- a new adaptation

probably made of a primitive bone-like tissue called aspidin, as well as dentine and enameloid,

materials that are very similar to the ones that make up your teeth.

This armor covered the head in big plates, with smaller, joined chevrons running along

the rest of the body.

So Sacabambaspis was the first fish that we know of to acquire this kind of covering, but

it would soon have many imitators.

The period that came next, the Silurian, saw the evolution of armor in many groups of fish,

all around the same time.

One such group was the Heterostracans, whose name means "different scales."

They, too, looked like small, armored ovals with thick, fleshy tails.

Tolypelepis, for example, swam around Latvia 420 million years ago.

It was only about 8 centimeters long, but its armor was especially beautiful, made of

intricate, ridged, interlocking scales.

Other Heterostracans had fused plates on their heads, with diamond-shaped or elongated scales

covering their tails.

But head plates took on new forms in another group of jawless fish: the Osteostracans,

whose name means "bony shields."

The armor on these fish was typically just a large, one-piece shield that covered the

head, made of dentine and bone, with smaller linear scales along the body.

These head shields were wider than the rest of the body, and they sometimes tended toward

extravagance, as in the case of Boreaspis, a fish that sported a large spike sprouting

from its face.

Osteostracans also boasted a brand-new feature: fins -- namely, dorsal fins and small, paddle-like

side-fins that gave them greater mobility in the water.

And this is where armored fish start to take an especially interesting turn.

Because, osteostracans are among the few jawless fish to have a bony internal skeleton, or

endoskeleton.

They didn't have much of one -- their backbones, like those of heterostracans and earlier fish,

was made of cartilage.

But their fins and parts of their skulls were some of the first to be made of bone.

And this brings us to probably the best-known armored fish, the Placoderms.

Placoderm means "plate skin," and plated they indeed were, with big chunks of bone,

dentine and enameloid armor on their head and bodies.

In some placoderms, the covering got up to 5 centimeters thick.

But placoderms were also unique among armored fish in having a complete, mineralized internal

skeleton – meaning they had both an endoskeleton, like you do, as well as an exoskeleton.

And their endoskeleton and exoskeleton were completely separate!

For example, the skull of a placoderm had an internal braincase made of endoskeletal

bone.

Then, as an additional layer outside of that, unconnected, was a thick layer of exoskeletal

bone.

And one more big thing that set Placoderms apart from earlier fish was that they were

the first fish to have jaws, giving them the ability to bite, chew, and grind rather than

just scrape or filter feed.

Now, one of the most widespread placoderms was Bothriolepis, which was able to live in

oceanic environments, estuaries, and freshwater settings.

And while this fish had jaws, it didn't have true teeth.

Instead, it had bony plates that it used to grind up its food, like decomposing plant

and animal matter.

Much bigger than Bothriolepis -- and more carnivorous -- was Dunkleosteus, a giant,

predator that could reach up to 9 meters in length, with massive, shearing jaws.

It didn't have teeth, either, but the sharpened sections of bone it used instead could have

produced up to 7400 newtons of force, making it one of the strongest bites of any fish,

living or extinct, and certainly the strongest bite in the world at the time.

So armored fish came in a variety of shapes and sizes during the Silurian and Devonian,

from tiny Heterostracans to massive Placoderms.

But why did these fish evolve armor in the first place?

I mean, it's possible that armor evolved as armor: to protect them from other

fish and predators.

And indeed, bite marks on armored bone, and remnants of armored fish found in the feces

of other animals, are common in the fossil record.

There are even fossils of Dunkleosteus that bear the bite marks of other Dunkleosteus.

So, if armor evolved just for protection, it certainly wasn't 100% effective.

But that might not have been its only purpose.

Instead, the evolution of bony armor might have had a whole lot to do with storing vital

minerals.

See, bone and other bony tissues contain a lot of Calcium and Phosphorous.

You probably know that these minerals help keep bones strong, but they're also necessary

for a lot of chemical processes in your body, like muscle movement.

That's right, calcium's not just for bones!

You need a certain amount of calcium for your muscles to work, because it makes your muscle

fibers contract.

And Phosphorous is an important part of the little molecule your body uses to store and

transfer energy: Adenosine Triphosphate, or ATP.

So, without phosphorus and calcium, the internal workings of your body - or that of an armored

fish - basically just wouldn't run.

That's why modern animals -- including you -- use bone as a repository for calcium and

phosphorous.

We have special cells that quickly break down bone, sending calcium and phosphorous into

the bloodstream, in a process called bone reabsorption.

When bone tissue is broken down like this, it changes the microscopic structure of the

bone.

And scientists have seen signs of those changes in the armor of heterostracans, osteostracans

and placoderms.

So, it seems that these armored fish did use their bony armor for mineral storage.

And this ability may have been one of the key reasons that these fish were so successful,

allowing them to take over all kinds of watery habitats.

Both calcium and phosphorus are present in water, but they occur in much lower concentrations

in fresh water than they do in the ocean.

And heterostracans, osteostracans and placoderms have been found in both salty AND fresh water

environments.

So then having big bony shields may have acted like a camel's hump for calcium, an

important resource that kept their muscles working at top speed while they explored rivers

and lakes.

And of course, it's also possible armor evolved for both reasons -- as a convenient

storage for muscle-moving minerals, and a nice piece of protection to help keep you

from getting chomped on.

So you can credit these ancient fish for acquiring the evolutionary breakthrough that was the

mineralized suit of armor.

But, do we have them to thank for our bony skeletons?

Probably not.

Or at least not directly.

We might be able to trace them back to a common ancestor, though.

The problem is that, like so many things in paleontology, the relationship of armored

fish to other living things is … vague.

Most of today's bony fish are ray-finned fishes.

And land-dwelling vertebrates are descended from lobe-finned fishes.

But it's not clear how armored fish, especially placoderms, were related to either of these

groups.

Some scientists think that, while both ray-finned and lobe-finned fish shared common ancestors

with armored fish, they aren't their direct descendants.

Others think that most placoderms specifically share common ancestors with ray-finned and

lobe-finned fishes, but there are some placoderms

that are more closely related to lobe-finned fishes

than to other armored fish.

It's confusing, I am aware, but phylogenetics is hard.

And regardless of where they came from, the thick body armor of these fish didn't make

it through to the other side of the Devonian.

The late Devonian is characterized by one of Earth's "big 5" mass extinctions,

with a loss of 50 to 60% of marine genera, including all of the armored fish.

It's not really clear what caused the Devonian extinctions, which occurred in two main bursts.

The end of the Devonian shows signs of a rapid swing from greenhouse to a sudden glaciation

and then back again, a see-sawing of climate that could be responsible for many of the

extinctions.

But scientists aren't yet sure why this climate change occurred -- or whether the

cause was actually something else.

Whatever the cause, armor was no protection against the effects of it, and so the armored

fish disappeared.

In their wake, bony fish and cartilaginous fish like sharks and rays took over the oceans.

And the medieval age of fish came to a close.

Thanks for joining me today, and thanks to all of our patrons who help make these videos

possible.

And we want to thank our first two eontologists, Duncan Miller and David Rasmussen.

Thank you so much for your support!

If you'd like to join them, head on over to patreon.com/eons and pledge for some neat

and nerdy rewards.

And, if you're interested, like I am, in learning more about how our planet works,

then go on over to one of our newest sister channels, Hot Mess, which explores climate

science, the effects of climate change, and how we can create a better future for our

planet and ourselves.

Now, what do you want to know about the history of life on Earth?

Let me know in the comments!

And if you haven't already, be sure to go to youtube.com/eons and subscribe!

For more infomation >> When Fish Wore Armor - Duration: 10:19.

-------------------------------------------

Why Don't Humans Have a Mating Season? - Duration: 3:07.

[♪ INTRO ]

When you get "The Talk" as a kid and learn about the birds and the bees, the information

you get doesn't have a timestamp.

Unlike lots of other animals, there's no such thing as the "mating season" for

humans: People can get together and make babies at any time of year.

And cleary, they do.

From what we can tell, the reason humans don't have a mating season has to do with why other animals do.

And a lot of it might involve how we raise our young.

Plenty of animals — like horses, some types of birds, goats, sheep, and other critters

— have mating seasons.

Appropriately, they're called seasonal breeders.

The members of those species only go through certain hormonal cycles during a portion of the year.

They lead to females releasing eggs, often physical changes in males, and behavioral

changes that promote sexual activity.

This strategy evolved to make sure that, when offspring are born, they arrive during a time

of year when the environment is friendlier and there's food available.

For example, many birds in the Arctic Circle start laying their eggs in May, so that the

chicks are born in June and July, when prey is abundant.

The start and end of these seasons are triggered by changes in the environment.

For example, animals' biological clocks might note the days getting longer, which

is a sign of the arrival of spring.

And that might spur the physiological changes necessary for procreation.

The human reproductive cycle, on the other hand, isn't tied to a yearly clock.

Like many other primates, we're called continuous breeders, and we're capable of producing

offspring during any season.

Admittedly, people aren't equally fertile every day.

Roughly every month, there's a window where an egg is optimally positioned to be fertilized.

But that still happens on predictable, 28-day intervals throughout the whole year.

Regardless, the evolutionary reasons for this aren't quite clear.

It may just be that the environmental risks to our offspring aren't as significant.

Humans and other primates devote a lot of energy to caring for new babies, so those

babies aren't left to find their own food, or out vulnerable to the elements.

But it's hard to know for sure if this is the right explanation.

Of course, even without a mating season, there are still times during the year when people

are more likely to have kids.

Birth rates in the United States, at least, are highest in the summer and fall, suggesting

that people are having more sex and conceiving more babies during the winter.

That might be because, at least in many regions, the cold drives people indoors where there's

not as much to do.

It could also be because of sperm viability.

A 2013 study in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology found that, in more than 6000

samples, average sperm quality was highest during the winter, when the cells are less

likely to be damaged by heat.

But babies are still conceived during warmer months — and in warmer climates in general.

Still, if you live in the United States and your birthday is in August, you are definitely not alone.

It's just not because of a mating season.

Thanks for watching this episode of SciShow which is a Complexly production!

Even if humans don't have a mating season, there's still a lot to learn about sex in general.

And that's where one of our sister channels, Sexplanations, comes in!

You can check it out at youtube.com/sexplanations.

[♪ OUTRO ]

For more infomation >> Why Don't Humans Have a Mating Season? - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

ESTÁ TUDO BEM EM NÃO SER PASSAVEL I PRINCESS ONLINE - Duration: 13:29.

For more infomation >> ESTÁ TUDO BEM EM NÃO SER PASSAVEL I PRINCESS ONLINE - Duration: 13:29.

-------------------------------------------

Here & Now Tuesday July 24 2018 - Duration: 1:03:14.

For more infomation >> Here & Now Tuesday July 24 2018 - Duration: 1:03:14.

-------------------------------------------

Fiduciary Education - Duration: 2:06.

investments aren't the full picture

hey everyone Jason Kolinsky financial advisor at Kolinsky Wealth Management

and today I'm going to talk to you about fiduciary education so so many financial

advisors that guide 401k plan sponsors focus too much on investments they come

in for their annual review and they sit down and they're showing you all this

investment information performance statistics FI360 scores Morningstar

reports and they're just too focused on the investments and the performance now

I'm not saying that that's not important it is and participants need to make sure

that they are actively monitoring and watching their accounts and making

adjustments as needed however investments aren't the full

picture so as a fiduciary the Department of Labor expects that you are educated

on other topics besides the investment performance so you are required as an

example to know about the record-keeper you're using or you are required to

understand the plan design that's being used for the plan participant education

is another big one prohibited transactions there's all these other

topics that as a plan sponsor you need to know about so one of the things that

we do as a firm is we train our plan sponsors so we actually have 19

fiduciary education modules that we use throughout the relationship with our

clients so every time we come to see them we're going to be talking about a

new topic a specific topic and then we document it so we actually have written

formal documentation pieces that we have signed off on and put into the file to

show that the plan sponsor actually took the time to educate themselves on

whatever that specific topic is so if you are a plan sponsor right now and

your advisors not discussing anything other than the investments with you you

really need to start looking into fiduciary education