looks right at the camera
-------------------------------------------
6 Mistakes I've Made On The Spiritual Path – Don't Make The Same - Duration: 5:58.
6 Mistakes I�ve Made On The Spiritual Path � Don�t Make The Same
By consciousreminder
Yes, I know, there are no mistakes on the spiritual journey.
There can�t be, if you think about it.
The spiritual journey is, to a certain extent, a process of learning.
And don�t we almost always learn best from what we often see as our mistakes?
But then, if we learn from them, if we grow from them, how could they really be mistakes?
As you venture down the spiritual path, you really start seeing your life as a long curriculum
in a giant classroom called Life.
No mistakes.
Just your individual assignments.
I have had my �lessons� to learn, my conditioning to undo.
That said, here are 6 things that I would have previously called mistakes.
For me, they weren�t.
But maybe you will see something in them that will help you as you journey down the path.
1.
You cannot choose love too often.
So many times along the path, I�ve been given the opportunity to choose love or fear.
Many, many times I chose fear.
I pushed people and things away to avoid loving them.
I suffered, to be sure, and Life graciously came back and offered the lesson again and
again.
I�m very glad it did.
Choose love.
2.
You can�t sit too much.
I loved meditating when I first started, but I loved reading about and talking about spirituality
more.
And reading and talking about spirituality, while they can be helpful, just doesn�t
cut the mustard.
Spirituality must be lived, it must be experienced.
Sitting with yourself, finding out what you really are is so incredibly important and
transformative.
3.
Not enough time spent in nature.
For centuries, spiritual masters have made references to nature, to time spent in nature,
as a part of their journey.
There is something about the trees, the rocks, the plants, the sky, the sun that calls to
us.
Being in nature is a powerful aid to our spiritual growth.
Taking a walk in the pines will do more for you than a library full of books.
4.
Being arrogant about my beliefs.
I was a jerk in the early days of my journey.
I was cocky, overly confident, and thought I knew it all.
What a joke!
The real truth of the matter is that I knew so little.
By being so cocky, I rejected a lot of interesting and potentially helpful spiritual teachings
along the way.
I had to learn humility, almost by force.
I�m truly grateful I did, because now I see so clearly how all the things I thought
I knew were an obstacle of sorts to knowing the only thing that mattered: who I truly
am.
5.
Believing that feelings are reliable guides to behavior and truth.
I�ve made lots of choices in life based upon how I feel, which is not a great idea,
I�ve come to see.
Feelings are just feelings.
They are simply sensations in our bodies in response to our thoughts.
They have something to teach us, for certain, but they aren�t the truth.
For instance, every time you�ve experienced anxiety, you are afraid of something that
is only in your mind.
But you aren�t in eminent danger, and you aren�t going to die.
Thus, anxiety is a poor guide for action.
The only thing to do with feelings is to experience them and then let them go.
Feelings want to be felt.
Let the energy flow.
As Hale Dwoskin of the Sedona Method likes to say: �Feelings are not true, they are
not you, and you can let them go.�
6.
Rejecting spiritual teachings before giving them a chance.
This goes along with number 4 above.
For instance, I hated The Secret when I first saw it.
I was very agitated after watching it because I had a strong reaction to some of the �personalities�
in it.
They seemed so arrogant and, well, like used car salesmen.
And so I rejected all the ideas in The Secret.
Of course, I was being as arrogant as they seemed to be.
There are good ideas in The Secret, and had I listened to some of them, I might have found
a way to learn some lessons that I took over a year to learn the hard way.
I�ve found over the years that one of the best ways to learn and grow is from hearing
other people�s stories, their successes and mistakes along the spiritual path.
I would love to
hear
of
your �mistakes� in the comments.
-------------------------------------------
פתיחת דאב - Duration: 1:36.
For more infomation >> פתיחת דאב - Duration: 1:36. -------------------------------------------
El color de las ferias rusas | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 4:40.
For more infomation >> El color de las ferias rusas | Un Nuevo Día | Telemundo - Duration: 4:40. -------------------------------------------
MCPE 1.1.1.1 beta build 2 download sem erro de analise 2.3+ - Duration: 0:21.
For more infomation >> MCPE 1.1.1.1 beta build 2 download sem erro de analise 2.3+ - Duration: 0:21. -------------------------------------------
Energy Update – The Key to Inner Freedom is in YOU - Duration: 7:48.
Energy Update � The Key to Inner Freedom is in YOU
The Key to Inner Freedom is in YOU.
TRUTH time, Balance of the Inner and Outer �you� is now required for yourself
Much energy is �floating� around, being released in Spirit, the astrals/multi-dimensions
and yet as it is of the �old� (previous BB post) if we �tune in�, in the human
we can feel these through us, yet they are to be felt and released.
As in, in the human those who have been going inwards and working on their emotions have
�upgraded� their vibration and so when this �old� energy that is being released
�attempts� to flow through the human, it has nothing to �stick to� now.
If one is coming from their head and not allowing themselves to feel deeply then this energy
can be �caught up� or �trapped� in that space/area.
Which can lead one to feeling they are �doing their head in�.
This is like a false �trick� or �trap� that the ego/head is �playing� as this
is really pushing those souls who are yet to feel deeply, to reach in and do so.
No more denying or not admitting to oneself or �falsities� to justify oneself as this
WILL NO LONGER WORK.
People have been �asking� for so long for guidance, yet where is that �asking�
coming from, the head or the heart?
As there is a difference, a very big difference.
Many �think� they are asking, when in fact they are doing just that �thinking�
and not FEELING inwards and asking.
There is a very very BIG difference.
TRUTH time, balance of the Inner and Outer you is now required for yourself.
No more hiding or fooling others and mainly yourself!
Many hide behind the �right words� yet what is underneath those words one is sharing?
Many �hide� behind the �right� Spiritual words and then Spiritual knowledge.
Reading and obtaining Spiritual information and insight is invaluable in our Ascension
and growth, yet there is more to it than this�then there is the FEELING DEEPLY within that is
the key.
I was let know by Spirit many years ago that I was here as a Traiblazer for and with humanity
in linking our Spirit to our Soul, through our emotions before this �came out� as
much as it has more so recently.
I needed to understand and �grow into� this very powerful message and resonation
from Spirit.
And to do so, I needed to work through years and years of coming from the head/ego/mind
as that was my justification to cope and manage from all I had endured in my life.
It is a slow �peeling� off of the masks and there are many that each of us have �put
on� over time, to cope and manage as �best we could� with where we were at, what we
were going through, in a time where there was �less awakening� energy as there is
now.
When we �come home to ourselves� we reach a �place� or �point� of then choosing
which �masks� we wear DELIBERATELY and by CHOICE, not by fear sub consciously, we
do this consciously.
By choosing I mean, we have many many sides to us and in the past we may have say played
the clown when we were nervous or detached, I mean, to deliberately be the clown by conscious
choice, while remaining and retaining our inner strength and core.
To not have a loss of control of the inner, yet allow our playfulness and silliness come
out.
We have many multi-facets that make us US.
And when we own all of our facets/sides, we then get to PLAY with this.
We get to play within ourselves and all we are experiencing.
We learnt to �lighten up� and have a laugh and play, and then feel what we need to as
we process and filter through the human what comes that needs to be released.
And then shift the energy once again and play and lighten up.
Not �allow� that energy to be �trapped� in a false positive ego, negative ego that
wants to �control�.
Flow and be free, like the wind through trees, feeling the leaves and branches as we go.
The Key to Inner Freedom is in YOU.
And all it takes is a conscious CHOICE to want to do so, feeling very very deeply within
and not �fooling oneself�.
As that will only �work so far� and then reality �hits� us.
We find our energy, our finances our health and other �things� start to deteriorate
or not flow.
When this happens, we need to ask ourselves AM I COMING FROM MY HEAD OR MY HEART.
This happens even with those who have been on their awake journey for some time as well,
trust me (what is the saying when someone says �trust me� ;-)�as I know, as I
talk to people all the time, who bare and share their hearts and souls to me.
Yet when they write, the layer above is very very different to what is underneath.
And this is by no means judging as I am way past that as I don�t judge myself as I also
don�t like to be �told what to do�, as we do not have the right to judge anyone!
You are not �perfect�, we are not �perfect� as we are �perfect in our imperfections�
and no truer words have been said in this, among many others.
Picture two golf balls�one has the divots and the other is completely smooth�which
one is stronger?
The one with the divots or the pits.
Own and accept all of ones divots, or pits, or ones Shadow sides as we have more than
one, yet usually one very main one.
Which can be very trying and difficult to own and admit, I know mine was.
And all my other �isms� and eccentricities that make me ME.
Unconditional Love, Truth and Honesty takes a very brave and strong soul to live by.
And there are many of us HERE and NOW.
That have been �waiting� to come out and to the forefront of ourselves.
As this takes �time� as �Ascension cannot be rushed, fooled or cheated�.
Yet the starting �place� begins with US and from WITHIN and that time is NOW.
And that is by coming home to oneself.
Much Divine Love in all you are and who you are right here and now and know that ALL you
have endured and experienced is helping the collective of the �greater good� of humanity.
And that I honor each and every one of you.
And yes, I am available for those who are �feeling� to reach out for assistance
and guidance with this for and with themselves.
As I help others to help themselves.
I don�t �tell� anyone �what to do� I am a direct link to the Divine/Source/Spirit
for you to receive guidance and information for yourself, to what
you resonate to within.
-------------------------------------------
All Eyez On Me, Rough Night, The Book Of Henry | Your Weekend Watch List - Duration: 3:41.
All Eyez On Me!
was originally in the hands of his Poetic Justice director John Singleton. Thing is, Singleton and the studio
couldn't seem to agree
And not so quietly. In an Instagram post, Singleton called out the filmmakers involved for not being "respectful" to
Tupac's legacy, stating that they had to go so far as to sue Tupac's own mom in order to get the rights to tell his
story. The movie comes out on June 16th, which would have been the rapper's 46th birthday.
Despite the controversies surrounding the film, or promises of new perspectives on the his life and music,
Tupac's story of what it means to be a black man in America, his rise as an artist and his revolutionary
beliefs are as relevant and as compelling now, as they were 20 years ago.
Next on the list? ROUGH NIGHT. Because we've all had them… although maybe not as rough as these gals...
Five best buds reunite in Miami Beach for the bachelorette weekend of a lifetime.
But it all goes dark when their hunky stripper for hire gets dad
On the surface, this film could be could be summed up
as a female version of The Hangover, or Very Bad Things… or Weekend at Bernie's - the list goes on…
But we suspect there will be more to this comedy than a simple gender flip.
But Rough Night brings with it something bigger than dildo deely-boppers and drunken babes acting a fool.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Culturally speaking, it's part of a larger conversation around female driven films.
In fact, in 2016 women made up 52% of the US moviegoing audience and last time I checked, that's a
majority stake. So it makes sense that studios are responding with more female friendly fare.
They're simply following the dollars!
Jurassic World director Colin Trevorrow is returning to his indie roots with The Book Of Henry, and we're pretty
excited about this one.
Part gritty family saga, part dramatic thriller, part adventure, part coming-of-age tale, The Book Of Henry
blends a variety of familiar genres to create something that feels fresh and new. What gets us most eager to
see this film, though, is Colin Trevorrow. A man who has been likened to the Evel Knievel of film directors
by Rodrigo Perez of Indiewire, Trevorrow is probably best known for making the leap from indie darling to mega
blockbuster hero in a single bound.
It will be interesting, then, to see how his experiences in big budget studio land
impacted the way in which he tells smaller stories like this one.
Seasoned author and comic book writer Gregg Hurwitz wrote this script, and given that it attracted talent like
Naomi Watts and Jaeden Lieberher, we're guessing the material is pretty top notch.
What's your favorite female driven comedy of all time?
Does Showgirls count?
Because if it does, then that's totally my pick!
Let us know in the comments below! For HitFix on Uproxx, I'm Miri Jedeikin.
-------------------------------------------
Baseball Joe of the Silver Stars | Chapter 27 - Duration: 7:10.
CHAPTER XXVII
BAD NEWS
Joe was plainly nervous.
Being called on so suddenly had its effect as did the unexpected action of Sam in resigning
because Joe had supplanted him.
But the young pitcher knew that he must pull himself together.
The game was slipping away from the Stars and the crowd of shouters that accompanied
the Blues would redouble their efforts to get Joe's "goat" as soon as he got in
the box.
He had a foretaste of what they would do when he got up to bat in Sam's place and struck
out.
It was no discredit to Joe, for the Blues had a fine pitcher, still it added to his
nervousness.
"If that's a sample of what your new pitcher can do we'll take a few more runs!" yelled
a Blue sympathizer.
"Oh, he only did that for fun!" yelled Rodney.
"Yes," added Tom Davis.
"He's saving his arm to strike you fellows out.
Go to it, Joe!
Don't let 'em rattle you."
[216]
The Stars took a brace, whether it was the knowledge that Joe was to pitch or not, but
they certainly braced, and in that inning got enough runs to make the score six to eight
in favor of the visiting team.
"Now, Joe, hold 'em down!"
pleaded Darrell, "and we can do the rest, I think."
"I'll try," answered our hero.
It would be too much to expect Joe to do wonders, but he did very well.
He only allowed two hits in the inning when he first pitched and only one run came in,
chiefly through an error on the part of the third baseman.
"I guess we've got their number now," exulted Darrell, when it came the turn of
the Stars to bat.
"Keep up the good work, boys.
We've got 'em going."
The Stars managed to knock out two runs in their half of the third inning and that made
the score eight to nine—one extra tally only against them.
And then began what was really a remarkable game for one played between amateur nines.
For the next four innings neither side got a run.
Talk of a "pitchers' battle" began to be whispered, and for the credit of the visitors
be it said that they no longer tried to get Joe's "goat."
[217]
Both pitchers were on their mettle.
Of course they were not perfect and probably some deliveries that the umpire called strikes
were balls, just as some that he designated as balls were good strikes.
But it was all in the game.
Joe was doing good work.
There were only a few scattered hits off him and these were easily taken care of by the
in or out fielders.
In this the Blues rather excelled, however, there being more errors charged up against
the home team than to them.
But the Stars had this in their favor; that, while there were a number of good stick men
among the visitors, they were not speedy base-runners and thus a number of men were nabbed on the
sacks, through playing off too far, or not connecting in time, who otherwise might have
brought in runs.
"Oh, fellows, we've got to do something!" cried the captain at the close of the usual
lucky seventh, when no runs had been registered for either side.
"Can't some of you pull off a run?"
But it was the Blue team who scored first, getting one run on a ball hit by the first
man up.
It was manifestly a foul, but the umpire called it fair and the man held his base.
Then Joe's arm gave him a twinge and he was hit for a three bagger by[218] the next
man up, scoring the player preceding him.
But that was all.
With grimly tightened lips Joe faced his next opponent and after that not a man got to first,
and the player on third dared not steal home, so keenly was he watched.
With the score eight to ten against them the Stars came in more confidently than might
have been expected.
And when they had hammered out two runs, tieing the score, there was wild enthusiasm.
"Here's where we walk away from them!"
yelled Rodney, as the second run came in, and with only one man out.
But there came a slump and the opposing pitcher braced up, striking out two men in succession.
The ninth inning saw a single run tallied up for the visitors, and in this connection
Joe did some great work, pulling down a fly that was well over his head and receiving
a round of applause for his pluck, for it was a "hot" one.
The unexpected happened in the ending of the ninth, when the visitors were one ahead.
Seth Potter, never reckoned as a heavy hitter brought in a home run, and the score was once
more a tie for no one else crossed home plate.
"Ten innings!" was the cry and the spectators[219] began "sitting up and taking notice" as
Rodney Burke said.
"Now, Joe, it's up to you to shut them out," advised the captain.
The young pitcher nodded and then he cut loose.
His arm was paining him very much for by a sudden twist he had wrenched the muscles injured
in saving the lad from the trolley car.
But Joe would not give up, and he struck out three men neatly, only one, the second up,
getting any kind of a hit, and that only good for the initial bag.
"A goose egg!" yelled Rodney Burke.
"Now one run will do the trick!"
"Snow 'em under!" cried Darrell.
And the Stars did, for they rapped out the necessary run amid a jubilant riot of cheers,
making the final score twelve to eleven.
"Oh, I knew you could do it!
I knew you could!" cried the captain, trying to embrace all his lads at once.
They had won handily though at one time it looked like defeat.
"Good work, Joe," complimented Darrell.
"You're the regular pitcher from now on."
"But if Sam reconsiders his resignation?"
"He can't," rejoined the manager.
"He's out for good."
Joe could hardly wait to get home and tell the[220] good news.
He fairly raced into the house, but he stopped short at the sight of his father and mother
in the dining room.
They were seated at the table and a look of anxiety was on their faces.
"What's the matter?"
gasped Joe, all his joy in the victory and his new position leaving him as he looked
at his parents.
On the table between them lay a number of papers.
"I've been served with a summons from the court," said Mr. Matson slowly.
"It's a move on the part of Benjamin and Holdney.
The court has taken my patent models and documents away from me, and I may lose everything.
It's hard, just as I was about to succeed—very hard."
"And you may lose everything, dad?" asked Joe huskily.
"Yes—everything son—I may have to start all over again.
I'm out of the harvester works now."
For a moment one disappointing thought came to Joe.
He would not be able to go to a boarding school as he had hoped.
Then the look of trouble on his father's face drove all other thoughts from his mind.
"Don't you care, dad!" he exclaimed stepping close to him.
"You can beat those fellows yet.
We whipped the Blues to-day, and I'm the regular pitcher for the Stars!"
-------------------------------------------
Sandy Hook rage over Megyn Kelly's Alex Jones interview - politics - Duration: 4:19.
Sandy Hook rage over Megyn Kelly's Alex Jones interview
An interview by NBC's anchor Megyn Kelly with InfoWars conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has
angered families of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting.
Finance giant JPMorgan Chase has pulled all of its adverts from NBC News until after the
pre-recorded interview is aired on 18 June.
And Sandy Hook Promise, an organisation formed to protect children from gun violence, announced
that Ms Kelly would no longer host their annual fundraising gala on Wednesday.
Some social media users have lambasted Ms Kelly for providing Jones with a national
platform "to discuss controversies and conspiracies".
Jones admits "some real kids" were killed at Sandy Hook but has helped push a theory
that the Sandy Hook massacre was "synthetic, completely fake with actors".
Twenty-six people, mostly young children, died in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School
shooting.
For years, families of the victims have been targeted by conspiracy theorists who falsely
claim that the tragedy was staged by the government in an attempt to tighten gun control laws.
Ms Kelly has defended the interview, saying US President Donald Trump gave "White House
press credential" to Jones by appearing on and praising his show.
But Jones has called for the interview's airing to be cancelled for "misrepresenting his views".
The mother of Ana Grace M�rquez-Greene - a six-year-old girl who was killed at Sandy
Hook - tweeted the NBC host an image of her daughter: "Here you go @megynkelly - her name
is Ana Grace M�rquez-Greene.
Say her name - stare at this & tell me it's worth it.
@nbc #SandyHook" She also told The Washington Post that giving
"Alex Jones a platform on Father's Day is especially cruel to me".
"This piece of actual garbage encourages people to call my mom's death a hoax and harass other
Sandy Hook families.
Shame on you @megynkelly," added Cristina Hassinger - whose mother and principal of
Sandy Hook, Dawn Hochsprung, was also killed.
More on Sandy Hook from BBC Trending: Sandy Hook to Trump: 'Help us stop conspiracy
theorists' The Sandy Hook Hoaxers
Others said the interview was akin to "defiling the memory" of the killed and would "help
legitimise" Alex Jones.
Chelsea Clinton said there was "no justification for amplifying lies" while actor Chris Evans
added that human decency was being "trampled by the quest for ratings".
New York mayor Bill Blasio also called on NBC to "pull the segment".
And tens of thousands also used the Twitter hashtag #ShameOnNBC, rallying people to call
the network and tell them not to air the interview.
Some, including political commentator Ana Navarro, said they would not be watching the
show in support of the victims.
One Twitter account added as an alternative it would air the video about the "26 Sandy
Hook Angels" who died.
Ms Kelly left Fox News earlier this year to anchor her NBC show "Sunday Night with Megyn
Kelly"
In a video posted to his website in November 2016, Alex Jones said in his "final statement"
on Sandy Hook: "There is some evidence that people died there...
I don't know what the truth is, all I know is the official story of Sandy Hook has more
holes in it than Swiss cheese."
Jones has also helped push forward the theory that 9/11 was a "fable" and an "inside job"
and other theories surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing as well as mass shootings in
Orlando and Aurora, Colorado.
However, he has retracted some of them when threatened with legal action, including his
defamatory remarks about yogurt company Chobani, and has apologised for promoting the false
Pizzagate theory.
-------------------------------------------
Chicken and Vegetable Crepe चिकन और सब्जी का क्रेप چکن اور سبزی کی کریپ Shaila's Dastarkhwan - Duration: 11:08.
Hello Friends Today I will make chicken and vegetable crepes.
Pancake and crepe are different.
Pancakes are thick and fluffy and it has raising agent.
Crepes are thin like dosa. No raising agent is used.
For Ingredients see in the description below.
Tip- Make thiin batter so that crepes turned out very thin.
First make a small crepe for testing.
If you liked my recipe do press LIKE button.
Please SUBSCRIBE and SHARE my channel.
THANKS for watching Shaila's Dastarkhwan.
-------------------------------------------
Breaking the Silence: Crash Course Film History #10 - Duration: 9:36.
Hey!
Hello.
Can anybody hear me?
You can?
Good!
That's because of something called synchronous sound.
It means that the words I'm saying right now are being recorded, then matched with
the video.
So when you watch this, the sound of my voice is in sync with the image of me talking.
Talking.
Talking.
We take that for granted today, but for the first few decades of film history, it wasn't
possible.
Theaters had to supply music, sound effects, and narration through phonographs or live
performances.
And when dialogue was absolutely necessary, filmmakers had actors mouth the words, and
then insert title cards – or inter-titles – in the middle of scene so the audience
could read the dialogue for themselves.
It took years of guess-work, tinkering, and experimentation to make cinema sound the way
it does today.
But when sound finally arrived, it changed the way movies were made and watched, forever.
WHAAAT?
You can hear me say WHAAAT now, thanks to that.
[Intro Music]
Nothing shook the foundations of the film industry like the coming of sound.
By the mid-1920s, the major studios were churning out movie after movie, the star system was
in full swing, and cinema had become an integral part of popular culture.
But in order to sync pre-recorded sound to moving pictures, artists and engineers had
to overcome a few major hurdles.
The first – and most important – was synchronization.
How do you get the image and sound to match up?
At the time, image and sound were recorded and played back using different devices, so
there was no easy way to link them.
Second, microphone technology was fairly primitive.
Sound quality wasn't good, and the mics themselves were too big to conceal.
Third, the process of recording and playing back sound typically required electricity.
That meant production companies would need more equipment, larger crews, and access to
power.
And finally, there was the problem of amplification.
Speaker technology at the time simply wasn't loud enough to fill a big theater.
And the search for solutions to these problems went as far back as the 1880s.
In 1889, Thomas Edison's assistant, W.K.L.
Dickson, achieved a kind of rough synchronization between the phonograph and the kinetoscope.
Eventually he came up with a device called the kinetophone that used a system of pulleys
to connect the two devices.
Thing is, it was buggy – everything had to be just right, or the whole system fell
apart.
Luckily, at the same time as Dickson, inventors across Europe and the United States were working
towards the goal of synchronous sound films.
In fact, three separate synchronizing devices were on display at the Paris World Exhibition
in 1900.
None of them solved the whole problem, though.
The common thread in all these early attempts was the phonograph.
That's what they used to play back the pre-recorded sound to accompany the film.
And the problem was, it was really hard to keep things in sync, you guys.
If the phonograph needle skipped, or the film jammed in the projector – which happened
all the time – it was nearly impossible to re-sync the two without starting all over
again.
More importantly, the phonograph relied on cylinders or discs that could only hold four
or five minutes worth of sound.
By 1905, virtually all films ran longer than five minutes.
Since the phonograph seemed like a dead end, engineers started to look for ways to record
sound photographically.
WHAAAT?
That's right!
They hoped to translate sound waves into patterns of light that could be recorded directly onto
a strip of film.
They called this technology sound-on-film.
Which is not creative naming, but it works.
The first experiments with sound-on-film began in 1910 when Eugène Augustin Lauste, who
worked for Dickson in Edison's lab, successfully recorded sound right next to the image track
on film.
In 1919, a trio of German inventors came up with something called the Tri-Ergon process.
They used a photoelectric cell to translate sound waves into electric impulses, which
were then converted into light waves and recorded photographically onto the film strip.
Most notably, they innovated a flywheel into the projector that would keep the film speed
consistent.
This mechanism was so superior to anything else at the time – and its patent so airtight
– that everyone had to pay royalties to the Tri-Ergon creators to use it.
At roughly the same time, an American inventor named Lee de Forest developed his own sound-on-film
system.
It was very similar to the Tri-Ergon process, but de Forest's version solved the problem
of amplification.
In 1907, while working on radio broadcast technology, de Forest patented the Audion
3-Electrode Amplifier Tube.
My nickname in high school.
This was a vacuum tube that amplified sound and sent it into a speaker, sort of like the
way a projector's lens takes an image and blows it up so you can see it on a large screen.
In 1919 de Forest realized his technology might help achieve synchronous sound, and
by 1922 he'd developed the process enough to test it commercially.
He formed the De Forest Phonofilm Company and set about making some of the very first
sync-sound films.
He called them phonofilms.
Most were just musical performances, vaudeville acts, and speeches simply meant to showcase
the technology, but a few were narrative films.
By the mid-1920s, a hundred exhibitors in the Eastern United States, Britain, and Canada
had wired their movie theaters for sound, specifically to screen de Forest's phonofilms.
But Hollywood wasn't ready for it yet because, the American studios were very good at producing
silent movies.
And they weren't convinced that it was worth the expense to change the way they made and
showed films just to accommodate sound.
Studio heads thought that "talking pictures," or talkies, were just a novelty that would
fade away.
That began to change in 1926, when a subsidiary of AT&T introduced the Vitaphone system.
Instead of sound-on-film, the Vitaphone was a sound-on-disc process that solved the duration
problem by recording the sound on multiple discs.
Genius.
At first, the studios all passed on the Vitaphone.
They said, "No way.
Punch."
Then along came Warner Brothers.
At the time, they were just a small studio looking to elbow their way into the big leagues.
And they decided to take a chance and be the first film studio to make and show sync-sound
films on a large scale.
They leased the rights to the Vitaphone system – as well as the right to sublease it to
other studios – and set about converting their theaters to handle sound films.
Now, originally, they didn't intend to incorporate dialogue into the sound.
Their idea was simply to use it for music and sound effects.
Their first effort was the 1926 film Don Juan, a sumptuous costume drama starring John Barrymore.
Before the film, they played an hour of sync-sound short films, including musical performances
and a brief spoken message from Will Hays, president of the Motion Pictures Producers
and Distributors of America, welcoming the world to the era of sound.
This is part of what he had to say:
"My friends, no story ever written for the screen is as dramatic as the story of the
screen itself."
People were blown away.
They were like, "Whaaat?
That guy's talking!"
Don Juan broke box office records in city after city.
Film critics lavished praise on the Vitaphone system.
And a Columbia University physicist said of the Hays speech: "No closer approach to
resurrection has ever been made by science."
Now, this doesn't mean that the coming of sound worked out for everybody.
Until now, screen actors up had been trained to act through gestures.
Suddenly, dialogue – not to mention your voice and your enunciation – had real consequences.
And not every silent film star was able to make the transition.
Buster Keaton, for instance, was known as the Great Stoneface for the stoic expression
he wore, no matter how things were falling apart around his character.
But then sound came along, and the charm of Keaton's deadpan silence was lost, when
he started to speak.
Kinda like when I start to speak.
Sound films also threatened the musicians that played live music at movie theaters.
And, of course, it was still going to cost a boatload of money to convert production
studios and movie theaters to sound.
Nevertheless, by 1927, the writing was on the wall.
Sound was coming, and the major studios couldn't stall any longer.
That year, the "big three" studios – MGM, Famous Players, and First National – adopted
the Vitaphone process and set about converting their theaters.
Meanwhile, Warner Brothers had already finished building a sound studio on their lot, and
producing their next film, The Jazz Singer.
The plan was to make a film with music, not dialogue; but when star Al Jolson improvised
a few lines, the studio agreed to leave them in.
Unlike most lines I improvise for this.
Jolson: Now, Mama. Mama, stop now. You're gettin' kittenish.
Jolson: Mama. Listen, now I'm gonna sing this like I will if I go on the stage.
Jolson: You know with the show. I'm gonna sing it Jazzy.
Jolson: Now, get this.
Jolson: [singing] Blue skies, smilin' at me. Me, me, me!
Jolson: [singing] Nothin' but, little blue skies, do I see. Doh, doh, doh doh doh!
And that – this incidental spoken dialogue – really sent audiences over the top.
Think about it – they'd always heard music in some form while watching a film, either
from live musicians or a phonograph.
And they'd been spoken to, in speeches and performances like the Hays speech or the de
Forest phonofilms.
But they'd never heard informal dialogue spoken to other characters within the world
of the film!
Suddenly, audiences were listening in on the story.
And overhearing the dialogue made the story seem more real.
In some ways, sync-sound completed the "illusion of reality" that began three decades earlier
with the very first motion pictures.
Soon, new genres emerged.
Musicals and dance movies were suddenly possible.
Disney led the way in feature film animation, incorporating dialogue and songs into their
shorts and features.
Gangster movies and monster films became more popular, as sound effects and music allowed
them to ratchet up tension.
Also, newspaper movies became fashionable, as films like The Front Page and Platinum
Blonde had reporters trading witty banter as they chased down stories.
These films eventually led to classics like Howard Hawks' His Girl Friday and even the
great Citizen Kane.
Never heard of it.
Old genres got a facelift too.
Comedies in particular found new ways to make us laugh through dialogue, instead of relying
on physical humor alone.
On the technical side, the arrival of sound changed career opportunities for women in
film as well.
And not for the better.
Prior to sound, women edited more Hollywood films than men did.
That's because, at the time, editing was thought of as menial labor, the grunt work
of painstakingly splicing together bits of film.
Then sound came along, and the technological requirements of the job multiplied.
And almost overnight, film editors were responsible for assembling not just images, but the sound
effects, music, and dialogue as well.
Just like that, the reign of women in the cutting room was over.
They saw themselves replaced by men, who were seen as more technically minded.
But women editors in Hollywood did make a comeback – from Thelma Schoonmaker, who
cut every Martin Scorsese film from Raging Bull to The Wolf of Wall Street, to Lisa Lassek,
who edited Joss Whedon's Avengers movies.
Today we talked about the engineering hurdles and breakthroughs that led to the arrival
of reliable synchronous sound to cinema.
We learned how the Hollywood studios resisted the arrival of sound films as long as they
could, until audience demand forced them to give in.
And we considered how sound film changed the studios, the films themselves, and the lives
of those who made them.
Which sets us up perfectly for what came next: the official Golden Age of Hollywood.
I'll see you then!
In the pictures!
Crash Course Film History is produced in association with PBS Digital Studios.
You can head over to their channel to check out a playlist of their latest amazing shows,
like Gross Science, Artrageous with Nate, and Full Time Kid.
This episode of Crash Course was filmed in the Doctor Cheryl C. Kinney Crash Course Studio
with the help of these nice flywheels, and our amazing graphics team is Thought Cafe.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét