Thứ Sáu, 30 tháng 6, 2017

Waching daily Jul 1 2017

when in the year, 1159 AD

Bhaskara the learner who is a mathematician?

Sketched a picture of a wheel that had curved reservoir of mercury.

He said that when the wheel spun the mercury would come to the bottom of the each reservoir

Leaving one side of the wheel perpetually heavier than the other side .Which would make the winds spin forever

Bhaskara's Design the first ever perpetual motion machine

Perpetual motion machine are those device that do work indefinitely without any external source.

This has made scientists and invertors to make perpetual motion devices

But by far the most persistent dream of inventors has been to get something for nothing

That is to create a machine that will start itself

Overcome all Friction and still have enough power left to do useful work in short

Like Zimara's, windmill self-propelling windmill The capillary bowl where the capillary action

Forces water upwards The Oxford Electric Bell which sticks back and Forth due to charge repulsion

But , why don't we see any perpetual motion machines? This is because they do not work at all

May be it looks functional on paper but practically .they do not follow the laws of thermodynamics

Which is a branch of physics that deals with the relation of different forms of energy the first law of thermodynamics?

The first law of thermodynamics tell that energy can't be created

nor be destroyed .So you can't get more energy than you put in. Then this rules out the ideal of perpetual motion

Devices because it can power itself not anything else . You may tell why not run the device alone

But the Bhaskara's wheel don't work due to the shift of the center of mass

All right to make it simple

I will leave a link below so you can see that experiment which was done by physics girl

even a perpetual motion machine was made to follow the first law it wouldn't work because of the second law as

It says that energy tends to spread out through process like friction

So everyone mechine would have moving parts and these moving parts would stop working after a long time due to friction and this two laws

Do not allow to make a perpetual motion machine

But scientists are still trying to make this device because we still didn't understand the law of universe . Hoping for the best

This is pavana signing off for now do subscribe for more videos and

Please don't forget to comment down there. Thank you for watching the video. Bye. Bye

For more infomation >> Perpetual Motion - Pavana - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

84 - O Projeto Aurora - Duration: 11:52.

For more infomation >> 84 - O Projeto Aurora - Duration: 11:52.

-------------------------------------------

البصمة الثابتة | 06 - Duration: 2:49.

For more infomation >> البصمة الثابتة | 06 - Duration: 2:49.

-------------------------------------------

THE NEW UPDATE ON BEDWARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Minecraft Bedwars) w/Sofaplayz 123 & Wonderlusts - Duration: 2:02:25.

For more infomation >> THE NEW UPDATE ON BEDWARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Minecraft Bedwars) w/Sofaplayz 123 & Wonderlusts - Duration: 2:02:25.

-------------------------------------------

이달의소녀탐구 #147 (LOOΠΔ TV #147) - Duration: 0:51.

JinSoul: We finished the photo shooting portion at first site!

JinSoul: I'm representing the color blue

JinSoul: and it's completely opposite to Kim Lip's

JinSoul: And you can see the word 'blue' in my song's lyrics

JinSoul: That is the point

JinSoul: I recorded it so well

JinSoul: Blue~

JinSoul: Red~ Blue!

Kim Lip: What's the next?

JinSoul: I'm also curious about next member's representing color

JinSoul: Please look fowrard to it!

(Now the three girls are heading over to the next shooting site!)

Kim Lip: Bye!

For more infomation >> 이달의소녀탐구 #147 (LOOΠΔ TV #147) - Duration: 0:51.

-------------------------------------------

Los 5 Speedruns más Legendarios en Videojuegos - Duration: 10:06.

For more infomation >> Los 5 Speedruns más Legendarios en Videojuegos - Duration: 10:06.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Allegedly Tried To Blackmail Mika And Joe - Duration: 15:26.

THE PLOT THICKENS IN THE STORY INVOLVING DONALD

TRUMP'S ATTACK ON MIKA BRZEZINSKI HIS ACCUSATIONS

THAT SHE HAD A FACELIFT AND WAS BLEEDNG AS A RESULT OF THAT.

OF COURSE PEOPLE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE HAVE

CRITICIZED HIM BECAUSE OF HIS CHILDISH TWEETS BUT NOW WE FIND

OUT THAT DONALD TRUMP ALLEGEDLY THREATENED TO PUBLISH OR HAVE

THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER PUBLISH A SCANDALOUS STORY ABOUT MIKA

BREZINSKI AND JOE SCARBOROUGH'S RELATIONSHIP AND APPARENTLY HAD

HIS PEOPLE CALLED JOE AND MIKA AND LET THEM KNOW IF YOU

APOLOGIZE TO THE PRESIDENT, MAYBE WE COULD DO SOMETHING TO

PREVENT THE PUBLICATION OF THIS RIDICULOUS STORY.

WE ARE

CHILDREN.

THIS IS A COUNTRY FULL OF CHILDREN.

TOP WHITE HOUSE

AIDES HAD CONTACTED HIM TO SAY THAT THEY COULD PREVENT THE

NATIONAL INQUIRER FROM PUBLISHING A NEGATIVE ARE GOOD

ARTICLE ABOUT THAT THEY CALL THE PRESIDENT, APOLOGIZE FOR

CRITICIZING HIM ON THERE SO AND ASKED FOR HIS FORGIVENESS.

JOB

COMPLETELY DENIES THAT.

HE SAYS, THAT IS NOT THE CASE.

IN

FACT, IT IS THE REVERSE.

JOE CONTACTED HIM AND URGED HIM TO

DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS.

OF COURSE, THERE IS ONE PERSON WHO CONSISTENTLY LIES NOT JUST

ABOUT THIS BUT ABOUT EVERYTHING, SO I AM PERSONALLY MORE INCLINED

TO JUST BELIEVE NIKA AND JOE BUT LET'S HEAR FROM THEM.

HERE THEY ARE RESPONDING TO THIS WHOLE CONTROVERSY ON MSNBC.

THE CALLS KEPT COMING AND KEPT COMING AND THEY WERE LIKE,

CALL.

YOU NEED TO CALL.

PLEASE CALL.

COME ON JOE, JUST PICK UP THE PHONE AND CALL HIM.

IT'S QUITE MELT THE.

LET ME FLING WITH A WERE THREATENING.

THEY WERE CALLING MY CHILDREN.

THEY WERE CALLING).

YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

THEY WERE PENDING THE STORY ON MY EX-HUSBAND WHO ABSOLUTELY

NEVER DO THAT SO I KNEW IMMEDIATELY IT WAS A LIE AND

THAT THEY HAD NOTHING.

THESE CALLS PERSISTED FOR QUITE SOME

TIME AND THEN JOE HAD THE CONVERSATIONS HE HAD WITH

THE WHITE HOUSE WITH A SET OH, THIS COULD GO AWAY.

I AM TELLING CENK UYGUR, DON'T JUMP IN JUST GET.

HAVE

ONE MORE THING I WANT TO READ TO GUESS BEFORE YOU COMMENT THAT

DONALD TRUMP TWEETED IN RESPONSE TO THAT AND SAID, WATCHED LOW

RATED MORNING JOE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN A LONG TIMEÖ FAKE NEWS.

HE CALLED ME TO STOP AND NATIONAL ENQUIRER ARTICLE.

I

SAID NO.

BAD SHOW.

HIS TWEETS AND ALWAYS NOW THAT HE IS PUNISHING A JOB ñ A

DOG.

WHICH IS NEVER HAD ONE.

BAD TEETH, CENK UYGUR.

BAT SEGMENT ARE.

GEE, I WONDER WHO IS ON THE TRUTH I CAN'T QUITE TELL.

I

THINK THERE IS QUESTION TO ONE SIDE OF THE STORY.

I DONíT THINK THERE'S

A QUESTION ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE.

TO ME THE?

IS, AND I'M NOT SURE IT IS

THAT IMPORTANT BUT MAYBE IT IS BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW BUT NOW ALL

THE SUDDEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BLACKMAIL LEGAL CHARGES AND ALL

OF THAT, NATIONAL ENQUIRER IS COMING AFTER MIKA AND JOE

TO PUSH THE STORY.

WHY ARE THEY DOING THAT?

THEY ARE TRYING TO HELP TRUMP.

TRUMP HAS PLANTED 1000

STORIES AT NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

IT IS HAPPENED THROUGHOUT HIS CAREER.

THEYíRE CLEAR ALLIES.

I WONDER WHO PLANTED THAT STORY ABOUT TED CRUZ SLEEPING WITH

FIVE DIFFERENT WOMEN WHILE THEY WERE HAVING A PRIMARY FIGHT.

I CAN'T QUITE FIGURE IT OUT THE.

WITH ANYONE EVEN BELIEVE THAT STORY?

FIVE DIFFERENT WOMEN ARE SLEEPING WITH HIM?

REALLY?

ANYWAY.

WITH POLITICIANS YOU DON'T KNOW.

MAYBE TWO SLEPT WITH TED CRUZ AND TWO SLEPT WITH DAVE

RICKETTS, THE OWNER OF THE CUBS.

TOM.

LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE TED CRUZ.

THEY WERE JUST CONFUSED ABOUT

IT.

IT'S OBVIOUS THAT TRUMP NOW WAS VERY PISSED AND BY THE WAY,

APPARENTLY FEELS PERSONALLY BETRAYED BY JOE SCARBOROUGH AND

MIKA BREZINSKI BECAUSE THEY USED TO BE SO TIGHT.

NOW THEY KIND

OF TURNED ON THEM IN THE STATES OF THE WAY BACK TO MARCH

COMMENTS ON MARCH, THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER ALL OF A SUDDEN STARTED

TO TALK ABOUT THE RUMORS OF THOSE TWO HAD CHEATED ON THEIR

SPOUSES TOGETHER AND NOW OBVIOUSLY THEY'RE GETTING

MARRIED, SO WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENED, RIGHT?

I DON'T KNOW IF AT THAT POINT JOE SCARBOROUGH REACHES OUT

TO SOMEBODY AT THE WHITE HOUSE AND GOES COME ON GUYS, WHAT

IS GOING ON HERE?

CUT IT OUT, THAT IS RIDICULOUS.

OR IF THE WHITE HOUSE REACHED OUT TO HIM HE GOES KNOW,

JOE, WE COULD MAKE THIS GO AWAY IF YOU GET BACK IN LINE.

I DON'T KNOW WHICH ONE IT IS.

BOTH THINGS COULD'VE HAPPENED THAT JOE COULD'VE REACH OUT

AND THEY COULD'VE COME BACK AND SAID IF YOU APOLOGIZE, WE

WILL DO WITH THE.

KNOW, THAT PART I AM SURE ABOUT.

THE WHOLE IDEA THAT THEY DIDN'T ASK HIM TO APOLOGIZE TO THE

PRESIDENT PERSONALLY AND CHANGE WHAT HE SAID, I AM NOT

HAVING THAT CONVERSATION.

WHOEVER STARTED IT, THE WHITE HOUSE ASKED FOR THAT.

OF COURSE THEY DID.

EVER ASKED FOR IT, IT'S A LITTLE IRRELEVANT.

TO ME ANYWAY.

I DON'T THINK IT REALLY MATTERS.

I THINK IT DOES AND IíLL TELL YOU WHY.

IF THE WHITE HOUSE

WAS GOING TO PLANT THE STORY WITH THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER AND

THEN GOES TO TELL THOSE GUYS, WE COULD MAKE IT GO AWAY THEN IT

GOES A LITTLE MORE LIKE BLACKMAIL.

IF THE INQUIRER IS

GOING TO DO THE STORY JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE ATTACKING THE

PEOPLE THE PRESIDENT DOESN'T LIKE AND THEN JOE ASKS CAN

YOU MAKE THAT GO AWAY, THAT IS NOT BLACKMAIL.

YOU SEE WHAT I'M SAYING?

YES, BUT I ONLY THINK IT'S MARGINALLY, SMALL DEGREE OF

DIFFERENCE BECAUSE THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER IS DOING THE STORY AND

THEY ARE DOING AS YOU SUGGEST BECAUSE IT IS GOOD FOR TRUMP

BECAUSE JOE AND ME GET TURNED ON HIM.

THEY SHOULD'VE TURNED ON

HIM IN THE BEGINNING BUT WHATEVER, THEY HAVE TURNED ON

THEM, GOD BLESS THEM NOW.

THEY KNOW HE WILL REACH OUT.

THEN

THEY JUST PLAYED THE GAME SLIGHTLY MORE SKILLFULLY DINED

AGAIN, THE MOMENT THEY SAY IF YOU APOLOGIZE WE CAN MAKE THIS

GO AWAY THEN IT IS HIDEOUS.

IT IS ALREADY HIDEOUS, IT BECAME

HIDEOUS WHEN WE ELECTED A PRESIDENT WHO IS CLOSE TO AND

CONNECTED TO DAVID PECKER, THE PUBLISHER OF THE NATIONAL

ENQUIRER.

THAT IS AN OUTRAGE.

IT IS NO DIFFERENT THAN BEING IN CAHOOTS AND CLOSE TO AN

HAVING A PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WHERE YOU PLANT STORIES IN

THE WORLD WEEKLY NEWS WHICH RUN STORIES ABOUT HEADLESS

ALIENS TAKING OVER TOLEDO.

BUT THAT'S WHAT WE ARE, BEN, BECAUSE HE ALSO HAS A GOOD

RELATIONSHIP WITH ALEX JONES WHO BELIEVES THAT ALIENS HAVE

TAKEN OVER AND ROLL THE WORLD.

THAT IS WHERE WE ARE AS A COUNTRY.

OUR PRESIDENT IS A MANIAC WHO BELIEVES THOSE THINGS AND

WORKS FOR PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE THOSE THINGS.

DAVID PACKARD ALEX JONES, I HOPE, WITH THE WE THAT YOU

PULL THAT UNRAVELS HIM POLITICALLY, THIS IS THE

NUMBER SO LOW THAT ENOUGH REPUBLICANS ABANDON SHIP?

THESE ARE SOME OLD STATS.

TRUST ME, CHARLES GRASSLEY FROM IOWA,

RIGHT?

HE DOESN'T THINK THE PRESIDENT SHOULD BE TALKING

TO THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER.

CHARLES GRASSLEY BILLS ABOUT THE

NATIONAL ENQUIRER THE SAME WAY WE DO MAYBE ONE OF THE

THREE THINGS HE AND AS AGREE ON.

IN REGARD TO THE QUESTION YOU JUST ASKED, I DON'T KNOW WHAT

KIND OF WEED THEY NEED TO PULL DOWN UNRAVELS THE PRESIDENT MAKE

REPUBLICANS, AND SPECIFICALLY THINKING OF THE ELECTORATE,

ABANDON HIM.

IT IS NOTHING LIKE THIS.

I'M GOING TO BE HONEST

WITH YOU GUYS, THIS IS CONSIDERED A BIG STORY RIGHT

NOW.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IT, AFTER THIS VIDEO WILL GET A LOT

OF CLICKS.

IT'S NONSENSE.

OKAY ABOUT THEIR AFFAIR, THEIR

MARRIAGE, THEIR IMPENDING MARRIAGE, THE ONLY THING THAT IS

IMPORTANT TO ME IS THE FACT THAT THERE IS THE POTENTIAL OF OUR

PRESIDENT BLACKMAILING PEOPLE FOR COVERING HIM IN A NEGATIVE

WAY.

THAT IS THE ONLY PART OF THE STORY THAT I THINK IS

RELEVANT, BUT ALL THE OTHER STUFF, HIS ELECTORATE OR HIS

VOTERS DON'T CARE ABOUT THAT.

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT THE FACT

THAT HE INSULTS WOMEN.

HE'S BEEN DOING IT SINCE DAY ONE AND

HE HAS BEEN TRANSPARENT ABOUT IT THAT IN FACT I THINK SOME OF

THEM HAVE VOTED FOR HIM AS A RESULT AS OF THE WAY HE TREATS

WOMEN.

I THINK THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD CONVINCE SOME OF HIS

VOTERS AT LEAST TO ABANDON HIM IS IF YOU FOCUS ON THE ACTUAL

POLICIES AND HOW MUCH IT HURTS THEM.

HOW MUCH THE REPLACEMENT

PLAN BOTH IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE FOR THE AFFORDABLE CARE

ACT WITH ACTUALLY HURT THOSE WORLD AMERICANS IN THE MIDDLE OF

THE COUNTRY WHO ENDED UP VOTING FOR HIM.

HE REALLY DOESN'T HAVE

A JOBS PLAN.

HOW HE HIMSELF IS VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF

OUTSOURCING AND USING FOREIGN LABOR.

HOW HE HAS ACTUALLY WENT

OUT AND TRIED TO GET VISAS FOR FOREIGN WORKERS TO COME INTO

THIS COUNTRY AND WORK FOR HIS COMPANIES.

THOSE OF THE THINGS I THINK DEMOCRATS SPECIFICALLY NEED

TO FOCUS ON, IF THEY GENUINELY CARE ABOUT DEBATING HIM.

ALL THIS NONSENSE, IT IS GOSSIP.

IT'S CHEESY, IT'S TRASHY.

IT'S SUPER FRUSTRATING.

I COULDN'T HAVE SAID THAT ANY BETTER.

I COULDN'T AGREE MORE.

THE ONLY THING THAT I WILL ADD TO IT IS JUST TO ENHANCE THE

POINT THAT THE IDEA OF THE PRESIDENT BLACKMAILING, I DON'T

KNOW IF IT MEETS THE LEGAL TERMS OF HER BLACKMAILING, BUT THAT

TYPE OF BLACKMAILING TO COERCE REPORTERS TO RUNNING STORIES OR

TO CEASE CRITICIZING HIM AND THEN DAMAGING THEM PUBLICLY, I

GUESS THAT IS JUST BLACKMAIL.

THAT IS THE ONLY THING IN THIS

THAT MAKES A WERE TALKING ABOUT.

I THINK IT IS A BIG DEAL IN

PART OF A PATTERN OF HIS ATTACKS ON THE PRESS BUT THE REST OF IT,

TOTALLY.

WE HAVE A DUAL RESPONSIBILITY, I AM CURIOUS

ABOUT WHAT CENK UYGUR THINKS BECAUSE WE HAVE A

RESPONSIBILITY, THIS IS A NONSENSE STORY YOU COULD ARGUE

WE SHOULDN'T COVER BUT THERE IS TRUTH IN IT.

THE TRUTH IS THIS

IS WHAT THE PRESIDENT DID.

THIS IS WHAT HE THINKS IS IMPORTANT.

THIS IS THE THING, THE NONSENSICAL THING HE SAID ABOUT

MIKA.

WE ALSO HAVE THAT SECONDARY RESPONSIBILITY WHICH

IS DO WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO COVER STORIES THAT WILL MAKE

A DIFFERENCE?

THAT WILL MAYBE INFLUENCE THAT 3% OF

TRUMPETERS THAT WILL TURN INTO 5

MILLION?

I THINK WE HAVE TO WAIT THAT ON A DAILY BASIS.

TO BE HONEST WITH YOU GUYS, WE DO WAY DOWN A DAILY BASIS AND

THAT IS WHY THE SHOW IS HEAVY ON POLICY AND I DON'T COVER THOSE

STORIES SIMPLY TO CONVINCE HIS VOTERS TO SWITCH OVER.

WE COVER

THEM BECAUSE THEY IMPACT EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN REGARDLESS OF YOUR

ECONOMIC BACKGROUND THIS OR REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOUR

IDEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND IS AND SO, HE IS PATHETIC.

ANY NEWS

ORGANIZATION THAT CRITICIZES HIM HIS IMMEDIATELY FAKE NEWS THAT

DOESN'T EVERYONE THINK IT STRANGE THAT HE DOESN'T

CALL MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS THAT LOVE HIM FAKE NEWS?

THOUGH.

THAT'S ANOTHER IS WHY THE STORY IS RELEVANT.

OF

COURSE NO ONE SHOULD CARE WHAT MIKA AND JOE ARE DOING IN THEIR

PERSONAL LIVES.

THAT GOES WITHOUT SAYING.

BUT THE

PRESIDENT DOES, AND HE USES IT AS A POLITICAL TACTIC.

I THINK

AGAIN GOING BACK TO WHO CALLED WHO, I DO THINK IT'S RELEVANT

BECAUSE I THINK IT IS SLEAZY, HARDBALL POLITICS AND THE OTHER

IS BLACKMAIL.

THERE'S A SUPER IMPORTANT DISTINCTION BETWEEN

THE 2.

HE IS PLAYING DIRTY POOL.

I'M NOT SURPRISED BY THAT

AND I'M NOT ONE OF THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE LIKE IT SHOCKS MY

CONSCIOUS.

I GET IT.

WHAT I AM MOST CONCERNED ABOUT IS HIS

MENTAL INSTABILITY AND HE IS, SO THESE GUYS, JOE SCARBOROUGH AND

MIKA PRESENT SKI ACTUALLY KNOW A LOT BETTER THAN WE DO.

ONE OF

THE DISPUTES IN THE STORY IS DID HE INVITE THEM TOMORROW LAGO OR

DID THEY INVITE THEMSELVES QUESTO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE

DETAILS TRUMP IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

THEIR SIDE OF THE STORY,

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

IF YOU WATCH THE YOUNG TURK'S, YOU KNOW

HOW MUCH DISDAIN I HAVE FOR JOE SCARBOROUGH.

I DON'T HAVE A DOG

IN THIS FIGHT THAT I DON'T CARE.

I DISLIKE THEM BOTH A LOT.

BUT

EVERY ONE OF THOSE DIFFERENT DETAILS, SCARBOROUGH AND

BREZINSKI SEEM TO HAVE A MORE CREDIBLE STORY.

IS MUCH MORE LIKELY TO.

THAN DONALD TRUMP SIDE OF THE STORY, RIGHT?

THEY EXPLAIN

IN GREAT DETAIL.

NOW THEY ARE SAYING WHAT, WE'RE WORRIED ABOUT

HIS MENTAL CONDITION.

REMEMBER ROGER STONE WAS THE FIRST GUY

WHO TO DRAW THE THING ABOUT ALZHEIMER'S AND IT SEEMED LIKE A

WEIRD THING TO KIND OF THROW OUT OF NOWHERE.

NOW, IN MANY

DIFFERENT WAYS THEY SAID HE HAS A FRAGILE CHILDLIKE EGO AND IT

IS INTERESTING WHEN PEOPLE'S MENTAL CONDITIONS ARE SOMETIMES

DETERIORATING, THEY BECOME MORE CHILDLIKE.

THEY SAY HE IS NOT

MENTALLY CLIPPED TO WATCH THE SHOW WILL RUN THE COUNTRY.

THOSE ARE INSULTS BACK AT THEM, RIGHT?

BUT AT THE VERY END

OF THEIR WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL, THEY SAID WE ARE

WORRIED ABOUT HOW HE HAS CHANGED IN THE LAST VIEW YEARS.

SOME

ARE SAYING WAIT A MINUTE, HE WAS ALWAYS A DOUCHE.

HE DID THE

CENTRAL PART FIVE WHICH IS SO INEXCUSABLE LET ALONE BIRTHER IS

HIM.

HE WAS ALWAYS A MEAN-SPIRITED REALLY BAD GUY,

WHEN YOU, JOE, LOVED HIM AND YOU WERE GREAT BUDDIES WITH HIM.

I

HAVE NO LOVE FOR JOE SCARBOROUGH.

BUT WHEN

THEY SAY LOOK, HE'S CHANGED, I THINK THERE IS SOME CREDIBILITY

TO THAT I DO WANT TO PLAY POP PSYCHOLOGY TOO MUCH BUT NO

MATTER WHAT, EITHER HE WAS ALWAYS LIKE THIS OR HE

DETERIORATED OF THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS.

HE IS LITERALLY NOT

MIDDLE MENTALLY STABLE ENOUGH TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED

STATES.

IF YOU PICK A FIGHT LIKE THIS ANY SENSIBLE PERSON WOULD

BLOW UP ON YOU POLITICALLY, WHO CARES ABOUT MORNING JOE AND

BEGOT?

YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

BY WOULD YOU PICK A FIGHT WITH A COUPLE OF PEOPLE LIKE THAT

QUESTO BUT WHAT IF HE DOES THAT WITH KIM JONG-IL AND?

AND THEN MILLIONS OF LIVES ON THE LINE.

I THINK WE RUN THE RISK OF MINIMIZING, WE ARE EASILY

MINIMIZED IF WE START SPECULATING ABOUT WHAT MENTAL

ILLNESS WE THINK HE HAS HER DIAGNOSIS, BECAUSE WE DON'T

KNOW.

I NOW AM VERY CLOSE, MY MOM HAS ALZHEIMER'S.

WE DON'T

KNOW.

THE POINT ABSTRACTLY IS THIS GUY BY ANY REASONABLE

STANDARDS DOES NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE MENTAL CAPACITY, THE

EMOTIONAL CAPACITY TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

THAT IS DIFFERENTÖ OBSERVATION ANYBODY CAN MAKE THAT WE'RE NOT

SAYING IT'S A DISEASE, A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T HAVE THAT.

MOST OF

THE COUNTRY DOESN'T HAVE THAT.

I DON'T KNOW.

WHATEVER IT IS.

MILLIONS OF AMERICANS ARE NOT CLOSE TO BEING FIT TO BEING

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

THE DECISION-MAKING IS TO TYPICAL AND COMPLEX AND

THEY SHOULDN'T DO IT.

HE IS AN ACCURATE.

I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU.

I DON'T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT HE

HAS A MENTAL ILLNESS AND I AM NONEXPERT TO BE ABLE TO COMMENT

ON THAT BUT I DO KNOW THAT HE IS UNABLE TO HANDLE EVEN THE

SMALLEST CRITICISM AND IF HE REACTS THIS WAY, AND THAT'S THE

BEST POINT.

IF YOU REACT THIS WAY THE PEOPLE IN THE MEDIA, HOW IS HE GOING

TO REACT TO WORLD LEADERS WHO HE MIGHT FIND INSULTS HIM OR HURT

HIS FEELINGS?

YOU ARE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

YOU HAVE TO HAVE THICKER SKIN THAN THAT.

IF SOMEONE CRITICIZES THE SIZE OF YOUR HANDS AND THIS

LEADS TO THIS RIDICULOUS WAR THAT IT TELLS ME SOMETHING

ABOUT HOW YOU ARE GOING TO REACT ON A LARGER SCALE AND THAT

IS WHAT CONCERNS ME.

SO WE WILL SEE.

WE HAVE JOFFREY AS PRESIDENT.

WE DO.

For more infomation >> Trump Allegedly Tried To Blackmail Mika And Joe - Duration: 15:26.

-------------------------------------------

Fat-Shaming - Beauty Comes in All Shapes - Duration: 3:21.

Hello, everyone!

I'm Cath!

Let me ask you something.

Who is not satisfied with their weight?

And who wishes to be thinner?

In our society,

People love taunting and shaming people,

Who are quite heavy.

They're usually called "fat" or "chubby".

But have you ever thought that such shaming,

Is a form of "bullying"?

Bully is when you use physical or verbal power,

To force someone into doing something,

Or hurt them emotionally.

People who shame others,

Would say, "It's just a joke.

"What's the harm in doing that?"

But such "joke" affects others' feelings.

Have you ever thought about,

How they'd feel after you shame them like that?

Not only does shaming affect their feelings,

It also affects their physical and emotional well-being.

Some would say they're only doing it,

To remind them.

But a research has found that,

When people are fat-shamed,

They are more likely to avoid exercising,

And turn to food for comfort.

Some people are not well,

So they eat to relieve stress,

Or to make themselves feel better.

There are many cases like this,

Especially with people who are heavier.

This means that,

Not only does shaming not bring any benefits,

It actually brings the person down.

On top of that,

People who are fat-shamed are under pressure,

Which may lead them to develop eating disorders.

Eating disorders are when,

A person is obsessed with their weight.

They avoid eating, eat too much,

Or force themselves to vomit,

When they think of the food they just ate.

Besides,

Diet pills can lead to many health complications,

Even death.

And in most cases, they don't work.

You'd have to eat healthy and exercise.

Exercise is great,

But you should exercise for your health,

Not to conform to the beauty standard.

I'm not encouraging everyone to be "fat".

Over 10% of the world's population is obese.

But obese and fat are two different things.

Our bodies are different.

Our genes are different.

And our metabolisms are different, too.

Some people eat a lot,

But they are still skinny.

While some still weigh more,

Regardless of what they eat.

BMI charts that shows,

How a person with a certain height,

Should be at a certain weight,

Have been debunked a long time ago.

Everyone has a different weight,

That is considered as healthy for them.

What feeds fat-shaming,

Is because of the beauty standard,

Which dictates what constitutes as beautiful.

But just because society says so,

Does mean we have to follow,

Or that it's true.

A few centuries ago,

Heavier people were considered as beautiful.

That means what society considers to be beautiful,

Changes from one generation to another.

But it's time that we realize that,

Everyone is beautiful in their own way.

Beauty is not determined by a chart.

And we have no business shaming people,

Because of their weight.

What's important is that they're healthy,

And happy.

For those who are heavy,

You have to remember to take care of your health,

And love yourself.

Thank you for watching.

Don't forget to like and comment below.

I'll see you next Friday!

Bye!

For more infomation >> Fat-Shaming - Beauty Comes in All Shapes - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

How Many LGBT+ People Are There in the United States? #WithCaptions - Duration: 3:33.

How many LGBT+ people are there in the United States?

Well, the current consensus indicates that somewhere between 1.7 and 7.5% of American

adults identify as either lesbian, gay, or bisexual.

The Williams Institute reports that.6% of U.S. adults identify as Trans.

To be clear though, we don't actually know.

(intro)

There are a lot of reasons we don't know the answer to the question I'm asking - we 've

guesses, scientific estimates, but we should talk about why we don't know.

We don't have accurate data on the subject.

One of the reasons for that is that the US Census Bureau does not ask about sexual orientation

in the questionnaire sent to every American household every 10 years.

That is where we get most data about the population.

In the 2010 census, the bureau did record data on same-sex couples who live together

and identified the relationship between residents qualified as being "unmarried partners" or

"husband and wife".

The data in these instances is accurate, but it isn't the best way to collect this data.

One issue is that this method of collecting data on LGBT+ people by using the census is

that the census isn't asking the right questions.

It is limited in that it can only collect data on same-sex couples who live together

and are willing to self-report their relationship.

It does not account for LGBT+ people who are in a relationship but don't live together,

or single LGBT+ people, or Bisexual people who aren't in a same-sex relationship. Like me! Let's make this about me!

This line of questioning inherently leaves people out and pushes members of the LGBT+

population into the margin.

The second problem with this line of questioning is that you can't be husband & wife and in

be in a same-sex couple.

I understand that this is a clerical issue, but could we update the census in 2020 to

just say spouse or something?

And finally, this method of data collection on the LGBT+ community relies on self-reporting.

And as writer and activist Camille Beredjck has pointed out "it doesn't take social science

to figure out that LGBT people are likely to lie on official surveys...in fear of retaliation,

losing their job or home, or any other number of consequences that could come from being

out.

Too many LGBT folks the risk of checking that box far outweigh the contribution to accurate

population estimates."

There are other groups outside of the U.S.

Government who have been collecting and compiling data on the LGBT+ community and that is helpful.

But it isn't the most precise when the answer to "How many people are there in this group"

is somewhere between 1.7-7.5% of the overall population - that's a difference of millions of people.

And that's an estimate only for gay, lesbian, or bisexual people.

Trans people weren't even a part of that study.

We literally don't know how many people are in our community, but we should know.

We can't expect our representatives to craft policy or programs designed to help the community

if we don't know how many of our citizens belong to that community.

Having accurate and quantified data would mean being better able to serve the community,

but there are some serious barriers in this.

We need to start asking the right questions when we collect data, we need to instate proper

non-discrimination laws so that people don't have to worry about losing their jobs or homes

because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, we need to stop assuming that everyone

is cis & straight unless they tell us otherwise because those aren't the default options even

if they're the identities the majority of the population holds.

We have work to do.

Thanks everyone who stuck it out while I answered, but didn't really answer, the question

posed by the title of the video.

Please subscribe to see my next video, watch an old video of mine, or support me on patreon!

I'll see you next time, and hey,I love you.

For more infomation >> How Many LGBT+ People Are There in the United States? #WithCaptions - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Happy Planner Plan With Me | July Monthly Spread - Duration: 2:32.

(upbeat music)

Hi, everyone, it's Melissa!

Welcome back to Quiet Little Crush.

In today's video. I'm going to be personalizing the monthly spread for July in my Happy Planner.

I'm going to start by cutting out a patriotic ow.

If you've been following me for a while, you've seen me

use this before and I thought I would use it again,

kind of as an ode to my previous videos.

I'm just going to glue this down

and then I'm going to remove the pages

and add some washi tape.

I have this red Washi tape with polka dots on it

and I'm going to use it to cover up the word July

on the left-hand side

In order to replace July I'm going to use some stickers

out of this sticker pack that I got at the Target One Spot.

Next I'm going to take some additional stickers

and start randomly placing them thrilled the spread.

I have a second sticker pack with these large us a letters

and I was going to put them down the left-hand side

But I decided that the right hand side looks too plain,

so I added them to the top.

Next I'm going to add a few flags to mark a few items

That will be taking place this month,

and then add some more washi to the bottom Right-hand side of the page.

Finally, I'm just going to write in a few things

and that will finish off my spread

If you enjoyed this video,

please give it a thumbs up and subscribe

and I will talk to you in the next one.

Thanks for watching.

Bye!

(upbeat music)

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét