NASA Document Exposes Geoengineering As Tool For Climate Change
1966 NASA Document Reveals Future Goal of Engineered �Climate Modification� 31
Climate Change Through Climate Engineering Header
Two Primary Documents Featured in this Story
�Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification�
This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of government agencies in perpetual
and secret collaboration and the military to Modify the Global climate. Created by the
elitist National Academy of Sciences � decades of an inter-agency culture of secrecy explains
why the issue of covert aerosol Geoengineering (chemtrails) is a taboo topic to be degraded
to the status of �conspiracy theory� by a matrix of complicit bureaucrats at every
opportunity. This is why the FAA, NOAA, NASA and your local TV �meteorologist� refuse
to employ scientific observation when asked to comment on an unusual sky filled with bizarre
aircraft spraying.
�The gradually accumulating evidence of positive results from efforts at weather modification
led the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences, in November
1963, to appoint a Panel on Weather and Climate Modification �to undertake a deliberate
and thoughtful review of the present status and activities in this field and of its potential
and limitations for the future.� � Page 6.
�The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System�
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAThis Federation of American Scientists document is a 1986 Critique of
the 1966 NASA initiative where the author (Leitenburg?) characterizes NASA�s Weather
Mod Program as hijacked into a military weapons system. This document is one of several found
in: Studies of Military R&D and Weapons Development by Milton Leitenberg, Senior Research Scholar
� Center for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland, College Park.
Leitenburg is author of several books. (Amazon Books)
A 2014 Book of important, relative interest: �The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science�
by Tim Ball, PhD
Men in Black Neuralyzer Chemtrails SRM sm
It�s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue to push CO2 as the cause for climate change
but refuse to acknowledge the military has been actively engaged in Climate Warming Weapons
Technologies for decades.
Jules Verne wrote about geoengineering the earth�s climate in 1889 in a sequel to �From
the Earth to the Moon� called �The Purchase Of The North Pole�. Verne writes that the
Baltimore Gun Club purchased large tracts of the Arctic then used the famous canon from
the earth-to-the-moon to tilt the Earth�s axis. The goal was to establish a tropical
paradise as a profitable tourist attraction at the North Pole while �improving� the
entire global climate.
If Verne correctly predicted that man would travel from the earth to the moon, it should
be no surprise that he also predicted that a small group of influential men would consider
warming the climate for profit.
Verne could have been inspired by Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler who proposed diverting
warm Atlantic water into the Arctic back in 1877 � a dozen years before Verne�s �fantastic�story
was published.
Warming the Arctic with large-scale Geoengineering projects has been the vision of industrialists
for 100 years � and still is
Arctic detonation of 88 atmospheric, 29 underground, and 3 underwater nuclear devices from 1955
to 1990
Uploaded on Friday 17 Feb 2012 by GRID-Arendal � Nuclear activities in the Arctic over
the last 50 years
From collection: Vital Arctic Graphics (2004 edition)
Author: Philippe Rekacewicz, UNEP/GRID-Arendal
Numerous nuclear explosions have taken place in the Arctic. One of the largest military
nuclear testing facilities is on the island of Novaya Zemlya, where from 1955 through
to 1990 the Soviet Union detonated 88 atmospheric, 29 underground, and 3 underwater nuclear devices.
Dozens of civilian �peaceful nuclear explosions� have also occured in the Russian Arctic, where
nuclear bombs were used into the late 1980�s for seismic studies, mining, and in attempts
to extinguish oil-field fires.
nuclear-activities-in-the-arctic-over-the-last-50-years_12df
In 2008 � a year before low solar activity began to threaten 40 to 60 years of global
cooling, the covert aerosol climate engineers were confident they could achieve a big arctic
thaw for BIG OIL, a carbon tax and the politics of a United Nations led New World Order Bankster
economy.
World Watch Institute: March, 2008: Arctic Melting May Lead To Expanded Oil Drilling
More than half of the Arctic Ocean was covered in year-round ice in the mid-1980s. Today,
the ice cap is much smaller. Alarming evidence of this warming trend was released last week
when the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) released satellite evidence
that perennial Arctic ice cover, as of February, rests on less than 30 percent of the ocean.
�The rate of sea-ice loss we�re observing is much worse than even the most pessimistic
projections led us to believe,� says Carroll Muffett, deputy campaigns director with Greenpeace
USA. For the first time in recorded history, this past summer the entire Northwest Passage
between the Pacific and Atlantic oceans was ice-free, according to scientists. (Source)
Remember when People Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
VILLAGE VOICE: � Hey, remember when climate change was a swell idea? Coconuts were in
the offing.�
�Imaginations ran wild, and The Washington Post envisioned Manhattan becoming a tropical
paradise� � �People would be gathering oranges off the trees in Central Park, or
picking cocoanuts from palms along the Battery, [and] hunting crocodiles off the Statue of
Liberty.�
The prospect sounded so splendid to New Yorkers that Senator William Calder (1917-1923) tried
to get $100,000 appropriated for a study of the idea. Village Voice
Remember when Scientists Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
1962 Harry Wexler (March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT graduate and PhD in meteorology. Wexler
had been researching the link connecting chlorine and bromine compounds to the destruction of
the stratospheric ozone layers, but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods
Hole, Mass. Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled �The
Climate of Earth and Its Modifications� at the University of Maryland Space Research
and Technology Institute.
Wexler�s was last in a long line of ambitious proposals to warm the Arctic. Coincidently,
his proposals were made at the same time the National Academy of Sciences was working to
create a national weather modification program � a direction in which the military had
already embarked in 1958.
�Global Warming� initiatives proposed by Wexler:
To increase the global temperature of the Earth by 1.7�C, �by injecting a cloud
of ice crystals into the polar atmosphere by detonating 10 H-bombs in the Arctic Ocean
� the subject of his 1958 article in Science magazine� (Wexler H., 1958, �Modifying
Weather on a Large Scale,� Science, n.s. 128 (Oct. 31, 1958): 1059-1063).
To diminish the global temperature by 1.2�C could be doable, �by launching a ring of
dust particles into equatorial orbit, a modification of an earlier Russian proposal to warm the
Arctic�. To destroy the ozone layer and hence increase
abruptly the surface temperature of the Earth, by spraying �several hundred thousand tons
of chlorine or bromine� with a stratospheric airplane. Fleming, 2007(a), pp. 56-57; Fleming,
2007(b), �note n� viii� p. 9 & p. 5 (source)
The decision to reverse direction from warming the arctic to cooling the arctic was announced
in 1963 � the year following Wexler�s death when the National Academy of Sciences
Committee on Atmospheric Sciences recommended appointment of a Panel on Weather & Climate
Modification. pg 2
Prevailing Circumstances following WWII:
Operation Paperclip (Also called Operation Overcast) succeeded in recruiting scientists
from Nazi Germany for employment in the US after WW II and led to the formation of NASA
and the ICBM program. The National Security Act passed in 1947 made
possible the rise of the military industrial complex and creation of the Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA ) to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted without
public knowledge or Congressional oversight. Post-war advances in science and advanced
physics opened up opportunities to develop concepts of advanced thinkers like Nikola
Tesla that had been waiting on the shelf for over 50 years.
In 1958, military application of Tesla�s little known methods of electromagnetic manipulation
of earth�s atmosphere was already underway. White House advisor on weather modification
to President Eisenhower reported the DoD was studying ways to manipulate electrical charges
of the earth and sky in order to manipulate the weather for purposes of national defense.
The rise of an informed and educated middle class looked down on proposals that employed
nuclear detonations that became regarded as dangerous and arrogant. This is not to say
that proposals to mediate the arctic climate were totally abandoned.
If warming the arctic was regarded as good for commerce for 100 years why would a discovery
that found carbon dioxide was already performing the task for free, suddenly be regarded as
a climate catastrophe to be prevented at all costs (to carbon taxpayers)?
The BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico demonstrates how Big Oil exists in a world of opportunistic
pragmatism, no matter the risk to the environment. With an established record of corporate sociopathy,
Big Oil would have little interest in what event would cause arctic ice to retreat as
long as their long-held dream of new arctic navigation routes and access to previously
ice-locked oil and gas reserves was realized. It could make marginal difference if the arctic
temperatures rise due to (1) rising CO2 levels or (2) covert arctic climate manipulation.
This timeline of determined Geoengineering projects suggests the goal of mediating arctic
climate remains a favorite goal of the fossil fuel industry.
1877 Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler proposed channeling more of the warm Kuroshio Current
through the Bering Strait to raise temperatures in the Polar region by 30 degrees.
1912, New York Engineer and Industrialist, Carroll Livingston Riker proposed building
a 200 mile jetty off Newfoundland to increase the Gulf Stream�s flow into to the Arctic
Basin with the added benefit that it would �shift� the axis of planet earth. The
New York Times characterized the proposal as �amazing�� but not insane.
1929: Hermann Oberth, German-Hungarian physicist and engineer; Proposed building giant mirrors
on a space station to focus the Sun�s radiation on Earth�s surface, making the far North
habitable and freeing sea lanes to Siberian harbors.
1945; Julian Huxley, biologist and Secretary-General of UNESCO 1946-48; Proposed exploding atomic
bombs at an appropriate height above the polar regions to raise the temperature of the Arctic
Ocean and warm the entire climate of the northern temperate zone.
1946 Village Voice article from 2005 reporting on theMay, 1946 issue of Mechanix Illustrated
that featured several arctic-warming geoengineering proposals. One �brave new idea� was proposed
by Julian Huxley, then the Secretary-General of UNESCO, and brother of Aldous Huxley, that
would detonate atomic bombs to warm the Arctic.
1958; M. Gorodsky, Soviet engineer and mathematician, and Valentin Cherenkov, Soviet meteorologist;
Proposed placing a ring of metallic potassium particles into Earth�s polar orbit to diffuse
light reaching Earth and increase solar radiation to thaw the permanently frozen soil of Russia,
Canada, and Alaska and melt polar ice.
1958; Arkady Markin, Soviet engineer; Proposed that the United States and Soviet Union build
a gigantic dam across the Bering Strait and use nuclear power�driven propeller pumps
to push the warm Pacific current into the Atlantic by way of the Arctic Sea. Arctic
ice would melt, and the Siberian and North American frozen areas would become temperate
and productive.
1958 Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov�s proposed melting the Arctic and Greenland
icecaps by spreading black coal dust on the ice, creating cloud-cover across the poles
to trap heat and to divert warm Atlantic waters into the polar regions. This scheme was taken
seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held in Leningrad in the early 1960's
following an initial meeting in Moscow by the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences
in 1959.
1958 Atlantic Richfield geologist L.M. Natland, proposed exploding up to 100 underground nuclear
bombs to mine the Alberta Oil Sands. Heat from the detonations was expected to boil
the bitumen deposits, reducing their viscosity to the point that standard drilling operations
could be used. The plan was encouraged by US efforts to find �peaceful uses� for
atomic energy. The project was approved in 1959 but the Canadian government reversed
their decision in 1962 and declared that Canada was opposed to all forms of nuclear testing.
In 2012 the Canadian Tar Sands are, again an issue of international concern.
1962 Harry Wexler (March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT graduate and PhD in meteorology. Wexler
had been researching the link connecting chlorine and bromine compounds to the destruction of
the stratospheric ozone layers, but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods
Hole, Mass. Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled �The
Climate of Earth and Its Modifications� at the University of Maryland Space Research
and Technology Institute.
It remains largely unexplained why decades of optimism for warming the arctic was suddenly
replaced with a campaign of fear and doom for the consequences of warming the arctic
under the name of �Global Warming�, then �climate change�, as the efforts to engineer
warming failed.
In the 1960�s Geoengineering proposals to warm the Arctic took a largely unexplained
U-turn when oceanographer, Roger Revelle�s research concluded that carbon dioxide was
already warming the climate for free and without the need for expensive and risky geoengineering
projects.
This U-Turn of direction appeared to be a setback with the exception of those stakeholders
in the energy sector who had been invested in arctic warming projects for decades. Did
the CO2 story finally promise to give Exxon, BP and Shell what they wanted?
If the science of Roger Revelle�s forecast for global warming turned out to be wrong
or too slow, the DoD could step in � for reasons of national security � to assist
arctic warming as secret component of the military�s classified weather modification
and weapons program.
The 1996 Air Force document that forecasts �Owning the Weather in 2025� would not
rule out using Tesla and plasma technologies to increase arctic temperatures in order to
disadvantage a perceived enemy. A decision not to intervene might betray the military�s
primary objective of �Full Spectrum Dominance�. After all, access to Oil and Gas has been
a national security priority for decades.
In 1966, Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald was Chairman of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate
Modification and wrote:
�Carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the start of the industrial revolution
has produced an increase in the average temperature of the lower atmosphere of a few tenths of
a degree Fahrenheit.� Gordon MacDonald �Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck the Environment.
Source
MacDonald was referring to Roger Revelle and Hans Suess paper that reversed the debate
from how to warm the arctic to how to avoid warming the arctic. Revelle�s ocean research
reported a rise in carbon dioxide in earth�s atmosphere was allegedly a result of industrial
age manufacturing and coal-burning.Source
Revelle had worked with the Navy in the late 1940�s to determine which projects gained
funding and successfully promoted the idea that the Navy should invest more in �basic
research�. Revelle was deeply involved in the global growth of oceanography. He was
also one of the committee chairmen in the influential National Academy of Sciences studies
of the �Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation� (BEAR), 1954-1964. Revelle�s world influence
was significant as president of the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, an international
group of scientists devoted to advising on international projects. Revelle and other
scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography helped the U.S. government to plan nuclear
weapons tests so that oceanographers might make use of the data. Source
The conclusions of the BEAR report were understandably significant for demonstrating the harmful
biological and environmental damage of atomic radiation and could easily suffice to thwart
geoengineering projects that recommended detonating H-bombs. But the evidence is weak that all
intentions to mediate arctic climate was totally abandoned.
If the fundamental goal to warm the arctic remains an unspoken priority of national security
in the energy sector, the project could be taken out of public view and committee oversight
to become a classified operation in the development of the military�s weather warfare program
� an initiative that was acknowledged by civilian weather modification programs formalized
by the 1966 NASA and ICAS charter.
Since 1958 Congress and the military had already been working on exotic weather warfare systems
that involved electromagnetic manipulation of the ionosphere.
US Congress, Senate, Committee on Inter-State and Foreign Commerce, Weather Modification
Research, Hearing, Washington D.C. US Govt. Printing Offlce, March 18-19, 1958; Lowell
Ponte quotes Capt. Orville as reporting �that the Dept. of Defense was studying ways to
manipulate the charges of earth and sky and so affect the weather by means of an electronic
beams to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area� �. Capt. Orville also
discussed ongoing US Air Force experiments with �sodium vapor, ejected from jet planes
to intercept solar radiation � over enemy countries and rain their weather. (The Cooling,
op. cit. pp. 168-169 Source P. 42
The flip-flop from finding ways to warm the arctic to suddenly finding ways to keep the
arctic from warming was announced in 1963 � the year following the sudden death of
Meteorologist, Harry Wexler. Having total awareness of the military�s 1958 weather
weapons program, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommended the appointment of a �Panel
on Weather and Climate Modification�. source This event could serve to consolidate military
and civilian weather modification programs for peaceful purposes or � if necessary
� as covert weather modification and even climate warming operations secretly carried
out by the military under the catch-all justification of �national security�.
FOLLOW THE MONEY: Lobbyists for Big Oil publicly claim Global Warming is a hoax while quietly
investing billions in new drilling opportunities due to the reality of receding arctic ice.
The energy sector has made huge investments in ice-breakers and drilling equipment to
profit from the very global warming they are reluctant to acknowledge. The position of
having your cake while eating it is essential. When arctic climate warming is revealed as
a military climate modification operation, big oil can fall back on �we told you so�.
Since governments may come and go over the next 100 years, they calculate the demand
for oil � and the companies who drill for it � will remain intact.
�As the polar ice cap retreats, energy companies are looking north for a potentially huge new
source of crude� Source �Shell is one of six companies planning
to extract oil, gas and minerals in the Arctic as global warming melts ice and opens new
sea lanes to commerce.� Source �Remote and dangerous sources of arctic
oil are becoming increasingly attractive as the global need for oil grows and the existing
reserves dry up.�
Documents from 1966 reveal how the military and federal agencies are modifying the global
climate.
TITLE: �Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification�
This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of government agencies in perpetual
and secret collaboration , working with the military to Geoengineer the climate. Created
as an agenda of the elitist National Academy of Sciences � decades of an inter-agency
culture of secrecy explains why the issue of covert aerosol Geoengineering is a taboo
topic to be degraded to the status of �conspiracy theory� by every government agency in this
web of complicit bureaucrats at every opportunity. This is why your local TV �meteorologist�
will rarely make a helpful comment about an unusual sky filled with persistent jet trails.
1966, JUN: �Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification�
Prepared by the ICAS select Panel on Weather Modification
1966: NOV: A Recommended National Program in Weather Modification � A Report to the
Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E. Newell � Associate
Administrator for Space Science and Applications, NASA, Washington, D.C.
1966: APPENDIX I � Panel on Weather and Climate Modification to Committee on Atmospheric
Sciences NAS-NRC � Membership Recommendations 1966: APPENDIX II � Special Commission on
Weather Modification � National Science Foundation Membership Recommendations.
1966: APPENDIX III Report prepared by the ICAS Select Panel on Weather Modification;
�Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification,� dated
June 20, 1966 1966: APPENDIX IV Memorandum for Dr. Homer
E. Newel1 from J. Herbert Hollomon, Chairman, ICAS, Subject: National Weather Modification
Program, dated June 21, 1966 1966: APPENDIX V NASA Panel to Study Weather
Modification Activities; Membership, Chronology of Meetings, and a Compilation of Supporting
Material used by the Panel 1966: APPENDIX VI Budget Recommendations and
Trends for a National Weather Modification Program
1966 � NASA: A Recommended National Program in Weather Modification � A report to the
Independent Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E. Newell � Associate administrator
for Space Science and Applications, NASA, Washington, DC.
In 1966, a report from NASA to ICAS (Independent Committee for Atmospheric Sciences of the
National Academy of Sciences, NAS) was the first step in establishing a national Weather
modification program that would ultimately involve multiple federal agencies. The report
focused on four initial agencies: ESSA, NSF, NASA, and the Dept. of Interior�s Bureau
of Reclamation.
Under Recommended Principals it was noted that (a) each agency would be independently
funded while stressing inter-agency cooperation in research. Independent funding of agencies
could make the program less conspicuous and more difficult for Congress to defund. Also,
new agencies could be brought on board without high profile budget hearings. (b) A designated
�central� agency � while having responsibility for focusing the national program � would
not have any real authority to implement programs, leaving those decisions to probable unidentified
civilian lobbyists and DoD �stakeholders�.
Although the theme of the ICAS report is in the context of protecting water, agriculture,
forests, lands and natural resources, the knowledge gained from climate manipulation
was of more immediate interest to the military and their industrial complex.
Thirty years following the creation of the Nation Program in Weather Modification, the
US Air Force published a document (�Owning The Weather in 2025� ) establishing that
federal agencies involved in the National Weather Modification program are under tacit
authority of the Department of Defense.
Owning the Weather in 2025 � Opening Statement: Current technologies that will mature over
the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify
weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic,
economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary
for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.
In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security
policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such
a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral
actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international
organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our
national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy
will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide,
another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.
In this paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace
dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such operations will enhance
air and space superiority and provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace
awareness.1 �The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;�2 in 2025
we can �Own the Weather
Case Study 2
A 1986 Critique of the 1966 National Weather Modification Initiative
The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System
CASE STUDY Document located on the website of the Federation of American Scientists
�The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System�
This Federation of American Scientists document appears as a draft intended as a critique
of the US Weather Modification Program that the authors characterizes as hijacked into
a military weapons system.
For over 100 years, experts and authors were advocating geoengineering projects warm the
arctic. The public, at large, was entertained by these concepts even when suggestions to
detonate hydrogen bombs over the north pole were advocated by a nationally recognized
weather expert in 1962.
It�s revealing that initial proposals to solve the newly discovered CO2 �warming�
problem had less to do with cutting back on carbon emissions and more to do with a rush
to release toxic atmospheric aerosols without first, researching the hazards. The specter
of polluting the atmosphere, blocking sunlight and causing the release of huge volumes of
CO2 from the jet aircraft aerosol sorties is an obvious public health and strategic
concern that requires years of research that the government was unwilling to legislate
and fund. Therefore, the impatience with which these chemical aerosol schemes were promoted
suggests that emergency steps to cool the planet with aerosols was never the primary
mission.
In 1962, Geoenginnering efforts to warm the arctic were widely entertained but in 1966
it was top priority to prevent the arctic from warming by even one degree.
Trojan Horse?: Under the military�s vision to Own the Weather Weather in 2025 atmospheric
warming with ionospheric and plasma weapons is an established capability. The numerous
agencies inside the National Weather and Climate Modification program are actively guarding
the military�s aerosol and energy weapons program with stiff denials to the public and
media whenever the issue of �chemtrails� is a story on local radio or TV stations.
It�s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue to push CO2 as the cause for climate change
but refuse to acknowledge the military has been actively engaged in climate modification
since the mid 1990�s?
An abrupt reversal of policy from promoting arctic climate mediation to preventing Global
Warming resulted in ideas that both polluted the atmosphere AND became a source of Global
Warming.
Just as the ICAS/NASA National Weather Modification program is being formalized the record shows
most ideas to cool the planet suddenly involve bazaar schemes to spray or disburse particles,
biology and dust into the atmosphere and oceans. These are the same people who � just a few
months earlier, were eagerly lining up to hear Wexler talk about ways to warm the planet
with hydrogen bombs, destruction of the OZONE and orbital particles.
While most of us realize that many of these proposals from respected experts would be
catastrophic to the environment, not all of these draconian ideas have been rejected,
even as increasing evidence determines that deploying chemicals into the atmosphere does
more harm than good.
Deployment of geoengineering aerosols as observed in practice for two decades is now regarded
as a source of global warming � not a fix.:
Geoengineering Aerosols Are Warming the Atmosphere and Are a Source of Global Warming
Dr Joyce E Penner MugIn 1999, Climate Scientist, Joyce Penner published a study that determined
Jet Aircraft Contrails and high Cirrus clouds produce a net warming of surface temperatures.
Dr. Penner�s status as a climate scientist on the UN International Panel on Climate Change
implies a consensus on the issue of contrails and high thin couds warming the atmosphere
to affect climate change. (Article)
In 2007, investigator, Cliff Carnicom calculated the impact of the current unacknowledged aerosol
deployment into the atmosphere and concludes:
�It can be seen from this model that the results of artificial aerosol introduction
into the lower atmosphere can be of a magnitude quite on par with the extraordinary impacts
projected by even modest and conservative global warming models upon humans in the near
future. As the model presented herein is intended to be reasonably conservative, the impact
of the aerosol operations could be much greater than these results show. It is advised that
the citizens consider the viability and merit of this model in the examination of the global
warming issue, and that they openly take aggressive action to halt the intentional aerosol operations.
This paper is late in its offering, as my availability for continued research at this
level is limited. I am nevertheless hopeful that the information can be evaluated and
assimilated into the many rationales and arguments that have developed over the last decade to
cease the intentional alteration of the atmosphere of our planet.� � Cliff Carnicom Complete
study
Geoengineering Proposals to Warm the Arctic Are Replaced by Fear of Global Warming
1965; President�s Science Advisory Committee, United States; Proposal: Investigated injecting
condensation or freezing nuclei into the atmosphere to counteract the effects of increasing carbon
dioxide. 1977; Cesare Marchetti, Italian industrial
physicist; Coined the term �geoengineering� and proposed sequestering CO2 in the deep
ocean. 1983; Stanford Penner, A. M. Schneider, and
E. M. Kennedy, American physicists; Suggested introducing small particles into the atmosphere
to reflect more sunlight back into space. 1988; John H. Martin, American oceanographer;
Proposed dispersing a relatively small amount of iron into appropriate areas of the ocean
to create large algae blooms that could take in enough atmospheric carbon to reverse the
greenhouse effect and cool Earth. 1989; James T. Early, American climatologist
suggested deflecting sunlight by 2 percent with a $1 trillion to $10 trillion �space
shade� placed in Earth orbit. 1990; John Latham, British cloud physicist;
Proposed seeding marine stratocumulus clouds with seawater droplets to increase their reflectivity
and longevity. 1992; NAS Committee on Science, Engineering,
and Public Policy proposed adding more dust to naturally occurring stratospheric dust
to increase the net reflection of sunlight. 1998: International Space Station (ISS): The
first modular component of the International Space Station (ISS) was launched and is the
current (in 2012) habitable artificial satellite in low Earth orbit following the Salyut, Almaz,
Skylab and Mir. (1998 ISS mission consistent with same year increase in jet aerosol public
observations and complaints) The stated function of the SSI is to provide an international
space platform for research and experimentation in the fields of biology, human biology, physics,
astronomy, meteorology (weather) and other fields.
2010: Geoengineer, David Keith (AAAS Meeting) proposal to use jet aircraft to spray Sulfur
dioxide and aluminum nano-particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space.
In 1968, Gordon J. F. MacDonald authored a chapter in �Unless Peace Comes� where
he correctly predicted that future means of obtaining national objectives by force hinges
on man�s ability to control and manipulate the environment of planet Earth.
�When achieved, this power over his environment will provide man with a new force capable
of doing great and indiscriminate damage. Our present primitive understanding of deliberate
environmental change makes it difficult to imagine a world in which geophysical warfare
is practised. Such a world might be one in which nuclear weapons were effectively banned
and the weapons of mass destruction were those of environmental catastrophe. As I will argue,
these weapons are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars.�
�To consider the consequences of environmental modification in struggles among nations, we
need to consider the present state of the subject and how postulated developments in
the field could lead, ten to fifty years from now, to weapons systems that would use nature
in new and perhaps unexpected ways. �
More Than Owning the Weather in 2025
The confidence and enthusiasm expressed in the USAF 1996 document: Owning the Weather
in 2025 was supported by the advent of scalar weapons technologies during the Reagan Star
War years. The document promises: �weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree
never before imagined. The �never before imagined� comment speaks directly to the
HAARP ionospheric heater facility, the Bernard Eastlund patents and military strategies for
global military dominance. This scenario of weather control harkens to the predictive
warning from Gordon MacDonald in chapter in the book: Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck
the Environment. Source
Timeline for Owning the Weather: From 1987-1992 ATPI scientists build on Bernard Eastlund�s
patents for development of new weapon capabilities
In 1994 ATPI is bought by E-Systems with a contract to build the biggest ionospheric
heater in the world (HAARP). � In 1995, Raytheon bought E-Systems and old APTI patents.
� In 1996 the Air Force publishes: Owning The Weather in 2025
In his 2011 book, Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet, scientist and author,
Tim Flannery reminds us that proposals to melt the Icecaps were advanced after World
War II by reputable figures including the first director-general of UNESCO (Julian Huxley-1946),
by a top official at the U.S. Weather Bureau, and by a Russian oil engineer Petr Mikhailovich
Borisov. Scientific conferences debated the merits, while mining and energy corporations
contemplated the use of nuclear detonations in the extraction of coal and oil.
Reputable figures in the international community saw an opportunity to detonate nuclear weapons
as a novel and constructive way to geoengineer the Arctic. The prevailing rationale to justify
method included: (1) The arctic is nearly too cold to be habitable by humans (2) The
polar ice cap blocks valuable shipping lanes. (3) The expanses of frigid water up North
contributes to uncomfortably cold winters in many countries. (4) difficulty of drilling
for oil through ice.
The idea was publicly floated as a �peaceful use� of atomic weapons.
Flannery offers this example as evidence of humanity�s seeming propensity for hastening
its own extinction.
Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet � By Tim Flannery. Book Reviewby Mark Engler
Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov�s Proposed Method of Melting the Arctic Icecap
Borisov�s idea: If the Arctic ice is once melted much less of the sun�s radiation
will be reflected out into space and therefore the arctic ice cap will not re-form. An ice-free
Arctic Ocean would be a great boon to oceanic shipping, especially between Europe and East
Asia. Much land in northern Canada and Siberia would be freed of permafrost and made suitable
for agriculture. Borisov believed that an ice-free Arctic Ocean would lead to increased
evaporation of water and hence increased rainfall worldwide, including the region of Sahara
Desert leading to grass growing there. Borisov considers all of the impacts of the melting
of the Arctic ice cap to be beneficial. He asserts that the melting of the Greenland
ice cap would raise sea levels at a rate of only 1.5 to 2 mm per year.
This scheme was taken seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held
in Leningrad in the early 1960's following an initial meeting in Moscow by the Presidium
of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959. Borisov�s suggestions to warm the arctic included:
Covering great areas of the Arctic with black powders such as coal dust (G. Veksler, 1959)
(Carbon Black?) Dispersing the cloud cover over the central
Arctic Basin (D. Fletcher, 1958) (Geoengineering Aerosols?)
Deepening of the Thomson Sill (V.N. Stepanov, 1963)
Covering the water surface with a monomolecular film (M. Budyko, 1962)
Installations to direct warmer Atlantic water into the Kara Sea (V.P. P�yankov, 1965)
Pumping cold Arctic water into the Pacific to draw warm Atlantic water into the Arctic
Basin (P.M. Borisov, c. 1968) This concept also required construction of
a dam across the Bering Strait. Source: P.M. Borisov, �Can we Control the Arctic Climate?�,
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March, 1969, pp. 43-48.
In a related scheme, a proposal was floated to store nuclear waste in the Antarctic. The
plan would allow specially designed canisters of hot radioactive waste to melt down through
the ice until it reached the �ice-rock interface� where it would supposedly remain in cold storage
for 250,000 years.
The following Timeline is from the book, �Angels Don�t Play This HAARP� Advances in Tesla
Technology by Jeanne Manning and Dr. Nick Begich and contains disturbing facts about
the little known history of our Government�s use of scalar technologies to modify the weather.
Additional events and links were inserted in 2012 to update the list.
Timeline of public and covert testing and development of energy weapons
1886-8: Nikola Tesla invents system of Alternating Current power source and transmission system.
As 60-pulse-per-second (hertz) AC power grids spread over the land, Earth�s resonance
frequency will eventually dance to a different beat than her usual 7-8 hertz .
1900: Tesla applies for patent for a device to transmit Electrical Energy �Through the
Natural Mediums�. U.S. Patent #787,412 issued in 1905
1924: Confirmation that radio waves bounce off ionosphere (electrically-charged layer
starting at altitude of 50 kilometers). 1938: Scientist proposes to light up night
sky by electron gyrotron heating from a powerful transmitter.
1940: Tesla announces �death ray� invention. 1945: Atomic bomb tests begin 40,000 electromagnetic
pulses to follow. 1952: W.O. Schumann identifies 7.83 hertz
resonant frequency of the earth. 1958: Van Allen radiation belts discovered
(zones of charged particles trapped in earth�s magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. VA Belt violently
disrupted with nuclear detonations 1958: Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes 3
nuclear bombs in Van Allen belt. 1958: As far back as 1958, the chief White
House adviser on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the DoD was studying
�ways to manipulate the charges of the Earth and sky and so affect the weather by using
an electronic beam to ionise or de-ionise the atmosphere over a given area.
1960: Series of weather disasters begin. 1961 � Project Skywater � Bureau of Reclamation
(water) cloud seeding project funded by Congress. 1961: Copper needles dumped into ionosphere
as �telecommunications shield�. 1961: Scientists propose artificial ion cloud
experiments. In 1960's the dumping of chemicals (barium powder etc.) from satellites/rockets
began. 1961-62: Soviets and USA blast many EMPs in
atmosphere, 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer estimated at 4%.
1962: Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma resonances by antennas
within the space plasma. 1966, June, Report to ICAS by ICAS Select
Panel � Chair, Gordon JF MacDonald. �Future plans of Federal Agencies in Weather and Climate
Modification.� 1966, Nov, report from NASA to ICAS (Independent
Comm. for Atmospheric Sciences of the Nat. Academy of Sciences, NAS) was first step in
establishing a National Weather Modification program
1966: Gordon J. F. MacDonald publishes military ideas on environmental engineering. MacDonald
was Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification.
1960's: In Wisconsin, US Navy Project Sanguine lays ELF antennae.
1968: Moscow scientists tell the West that Soviets pinpointed which pulsed magnetic field
frequencies help mental and physiological functions and which do harm.
1968: Gordon JF MacDonald authors chapter in book: �Unless peace Comes � a scientific
forecast of new weapons� MacDonald was Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate
Modification. 1969: Hail Suppression Data from Western North
Dakota, 1969�1972 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City.
1972: First reports on �ionospheric heater� experiments with high frequency radio waves,
at Arecibo. 100-megawatt heater in Norway built later in decade; can change conductivity
of auroral ionosphere. 1972: Potential Value of Satellite Cloud Pictures
in Weather Mod. Projects � Report prepared for NASA by Institute of Atmospheric Sciences
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Rapid City.
1973: Documentation that launch of Skylab and associated rocket exhaust gases `�halved
the total electron content of the ionosphere for three hours.
1973: Recommendations for study of Project Sanguine�s biological effects denied by
Navy. 1974: United Nations General Assembly bans
environmental warfare. ENMOD 1974: High-frequency experiments at Plattesville,
Colorado; Arecibo, Puerto Rico; and, Armidale, New South Wales heat �bottom side of ionosphere�.
1974: Experiments airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in ionosphere with accelerated
electrons. 1975: Evaluation of Monte Carlo Tests of Effectiveness
of Cloud Seeding on Growing Season Rainfall in North Dakota.
1975: Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that VLF from power lines is altering
the ionosphere. 1975: U. S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces
Navy to release research showing that ELF transmissions can alter human blood chemistry.
1975: Pell Senate Subcommittee urges that weather and climate modification work be overseen
by civilian agency answerable to U.S. Congress. No action taken.
1975: Soviets begin pulsing �Woodpecker� ELF waves, at key brainwave rhythms. Eugene,
Oregon, one of locations where people were particularly affected.
1976: Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show nerve cells affected by ELF fields.
1977: Environmental Impacts of Precipitation Management � Inferences to Project Skywater
1979: Launch of NASA�s third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory causes large-scale,
artificially-induced depletion in the ionosphere. Plasma hole caused by �rapid chemical processes�
between rocket exhaust and ozone layer.� ��ionosphere was significantly depleted
over a horizontal distance of 300 km for some hours.�
1979: Annotated Bibliography of Predictor Variables for Weather Modification Applications
� Funded by NSF Grant ATM 79-05007 pub., Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana.
1985: Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent �Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region
in the Earth�s Atmosphere, ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere,� (First of 3 Eastlund patents
assigned to ARCO Power Technologies Inc.) 1986: US Navy Project Henhouse duplicates
Delgado (Madrid) experiment � very low-level, very-low-frequency pulsed magnetic fields
harm chick embryos. 20 1987: In the later part of the decade the
U.S. begins network of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to generate Very
Low Frequency (VLF) waves for defense purposes .
1987-92: Other APTI scientists build on Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities.
1994: Military contractor E-Systems buys APTI, holder of Eastlund patents and contract to
build biggest ionospheric heater in world (HAARP).
1994: Congress freezes funding on HAARP until planners increase emphasis on earth-penetrating
tomography uses, for nuclear counter proliferation efforts. (Oil and gas exploration)
1995-1997: Public complaints accumulate across the US regarding unusual cloud formations
and sudden increase in observable persistent jet contrails that appear unnaturally under
dry atmospheric conditions. These observations are accompanied by complaints of biological
specimens and web formations that appear to fall from the sky. Many instances of qualified
lab analysis reveal high concentration of aluminum, barium and other elements that are
consistent with DoD electromagnetic experiments 1995: Raytheon buys E-Systems and old APTI
patents. The technology is now hidden among thousands of patents within one of the largest
defense contractor portfolios. 1995: Congress budgets $10 million for 1996
under �nuclear counterproliferation� efforts for HAARP project.
1995: Test of patent number 5,041,834 to generate an Artificial Ionospheric Mirror (AIM), or
a plasma layer in the atmosphere. The AIM is used like the ionosphere to reflect RF
energy over great distances. 1994-6: Testing of first-stage HAARP (euphemistically
named High frequency Active Auroral Research Program) equipment continues, although funding
was frozen. 1996: HAARP scientists test the earth-penetrating
tomography applications by modulating the electroject at Extremely Low Frequencies (ELF)
1998: Projected date for fully-operating HAARP system.
2009: Operation HAMP � Department of Homeland Security operation to Modify and Steer Hurricanes
with Geoengineering Aerosols 2012: Celebrating 50 years of Success. A Compilation
of highlights from the Institute of Atmospheric Sciences at South Dakota School of Mines & Technology
Rapid City.
The World is Waking Up to State Crimes of Climate Warming and Violent Weather by Combinations
of Powerful Electromagnetic Energy Weapons and Aerosol Climate Change Engineering
It was in the mid- 1990�s when the US public a were suddenly confronted with unexplained
changes in the sky that included bazaar new cloud formations and new types of jet contrails
that persisted in the skies for hou
For more infomation >> Lộ kết quả Quỳnh Như , Nghi Đình " TRƯỢT " Quán Quân thần tượng tương lai - Duration: 10:39. 
For more infomation >> New eye makeup 2017 I part 1 I Eye Makeup Tutorial Compilation june 2017 - Duration: 3:54. 
For more infomation >> 6 Reasons why your Hair is Breaking | Relaxed Hair - Duration: 6:44. 
For more infomation >> Here's My Canada: Canada is an Amazing Country - Duration: 0:37. 
For more infomation >> Grings - INEQUAÇÕES - Sistema de Inequação do Primeiro(1°) e Segundo(2°) grau - ( Aula 3 ) - Duration: 13:59. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét