Thứ Hai, 27 tháng 8, 2018

Waching daily Aug 27 2018

What if work, were also your work out? That's one advantage of being

a Publix warehouse selector. Come with me.

When stores order items from the inventory in our warehouses, it's up to Publix Distribution

to get those items on to trucks and out to the stores, accurately and on time.

But who gets all that product from here...

... to here?

This is John. John is a Warehouse Selector with Publix Distribution.

He and some of the other selectors are starting their shift now. See his headset?

He needs it to hear prerecorded instructions and determine exactly what needs to be pulled...

and placed on a lift truck, wrapped up in a nice package, labeled and ready to load!

Sounds easy, right? Well, there's a little more to it.

Sounds easy, right? Well, there's a little more to it.

John walks a lot, lifts heavy objects, uses repetitive movements, and sometimes works in...

extreme temperatures. In fact, this job is such a work out that, for his safety,

he's required to stretch before he gets on the floor.

He also needs great listening skills.

Headset: [garbled] Aisle 346. 232 Green.

I mean, wow, he has to understand that. Quickly, and efficiently.

But it's all worth it, because John get a free hot meal with every shift, AND...

his wages are based on performance. That means as long as he stays safe and works accurately...

The more orders he completes, the more he earns.

He also enjoys health benefits, paid vacations, bonuses, and more!

Best of all, we promote from within here at Publix.

So if John wants to advance, he could potentially apply for a position as...

a truck driver, or in distribution management, or elsewhere within the company.

Could you see yourself doing what John does?

If so, then a job as a Publix Warehouse Selector may be for you.

For more infomation >> Publix Distribution Job—Warehouse Selector - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

Black Widow Interrogation Scene | The Avengers (2012) Movie Clip - Duration: 3:37.

This is not how I wanted this evening to go.

I know how you wanted this evening to go.

Believe me

this is better.

Who are you working for?

Lermentov, yes?

Does he think

we have to go through him

to move our cargo?

I thought General Solohob is in charge of the export business.

Solohob

a bagman, a front.

Your outdated information betrays you.

The famous Black Widow

and she turns out to be simply another pretty face.

You really think I'm pretty?

Tell Lermentov we don't need him

to move the tanks.

Tell him he is out.

Well...

...you may have to write it down.

It's for her.

You listen carefully

You're at 1- 14 Silensky Plaza, 3rd floor.

We have an F-22 exactly eight miles out.

Put the woman on the phone, or I will blow up the block

before you can make the lobby.

- We need you to come in. - Are you kidding? I'm working.

This takes precedence.

I'm in the middle of an interrogation.

This moron is giving me everything.

I don't give everything.

Look, you can't pull me out of this right now.

Natasha...

Barton's been compromised.

Let me put you on hold.

Where is Barton now?

- We don't know. - But he's alive?

We think so. I'll brief you on everything when you get back.

But first, we need you to talk to the big guy.

Coulson, you know that Stark trusts me about as far as he can throw me.

I've got Stark. You get the big guy.

Oh my gosh.

For more infomation >> Black Widow Interrogation Scene | The Avengers (2012) Movie Clip - Duration: 3:37.

-------------------------------------------

Dj Mask - California Beat - Duration: 3:44.

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

Sound of the beat

For more infomation >> Dj Mask - California Beat - Duration: 3:44.

-------------------------------------------

'Does Australia Have White Privilege?' | Stefan Molyneux Interviews Australians - Duration: 23:53.

We just wanted to get a sense of, what do you think the big issues are facing Australia

at the moment?

Um, definitely fracking, um, also the indigenous community, um, refugees.

Um, there's just a lot.

Um, yeah, definitely I guess, with just, um, rep- representation of indigenous people in

Australia, um- With regards to immigration, uh, do you feel

it's too low, too high, just about right?

Um, I feel like it's about right, but I feel like the representation isn't there.

Um, I don't feel like a lot of Australians are kind of, educated in what's happening

with refugees or immigration in general.

So, what would you like to say to Australians to educate them about those issues?

Um, just, I guess, it's a big one, just listening and showing empathy.

Um, definitely listening to other people's stories.

Um, uh, I don't know, I guess.

But the refugees are very expensive to the Australian taxpayer as a whole.

Like they tend to be a net consumer of government services compared to taxpayers.

What's the case that you would make for Australians as to why their taxes should go up, or their

debt should go up, and their consumption of public resources should go up, in return for

what?

Mmm.

That's a big, that's a big one.

I personally don't feel like it affects the tax ... refugees don't really effect tax in

general.

I feel like there's a lot of room for everyone and a lot of resources.

But, it's just not, um, what's the word, um ... shared evenly, I guess.

Do, do you think that the refugees don't cost money?

Um, I feel like every person costs money.

I just feel it's not this extreme situation.

Like this extreme perception that we have with letting people in to the country.

Well, but some people pay taxes and we would assume that the refugees would be paying less,

if anything, in taxes.

Yeah.

At least for the first little while.

Yeah, definitely.

But ... I don't, I don't know what the question is.

Well, the question is, when it comes to ... it is gonna cost more for Australians and so

on, and, uh, what do you think they would get in return?

Um, Australians would get in return?

Yeah, yeah, for the refugees.

From refugees.

Um, I don't, I don't think it's like, a physical thing.

Um, I guess it just ... I don't know.

Um, sorry, I'm so put off.

No, no.

That's fine.

Listen, I really, really appreciate your time.

Yeah, I'm just like, yeah.

Yeah.

No, thank you.

It's a good question though, right?

Yeah, yeah.

I mean ... it's tough to answer.

Yeah, yeah.

Definitely.

Thank you very much for your time.

Appreciate it.

Have a good day.

Hannah, I'm Stefan.

So, we are just in here and we just wanted to know what you think is the biggest issue

facing Australia at the moment, in terms of politics.

Well, I guess it always is equality.

Equality, how?

Uh, that you know, everybody has the same, um, sort of, standard of living and, and opportunities.

And do you think that there's a bigger gap between rich and poor at the moment?

Or is it getting better?

Uh, no.

I definitely think there's a bigger gap.

Do you think that bringing in a lot of immigrants who maybe don't have skills, don't speak English,

and so on, is that increasing, do you think, or decreasing the gap?

Um, I think that this country was founded on immigrants, so it's not really fair for

us to say that people from other countries can't come here, because, um, that's, that's

how we were founded, so, it's- Yeah.

... like, like me as a white woman, I'm like, we're quite privileged to be here, but my

ancestors obviously, came and stole this land in...

Ah, so the argument is that because white people stole the land from the indigenous

populations, that you can't ever say no to people who want to come to Australia?

Absolutely.

Absolutely.

How many people in the world do you think would like to come and live in Australia?

Like when you think of like, India and, and you know other places where they're really,

really poor, how many people in the world ... that's like six billion, seven billion

people in the world.

How many of them do you think would like to come live in Australia?

Well, I couldn't possibly put a number on it.

But it would be a lot, right?

A lot.

It would be billions and billions of people who'd want to come and live --

I think we're very lucky.

I think we're very lucky, and I think, um, we have a lot of opportunity, and we have

a lot of land, um, that is ... also a lot of land that isn't inhabited --

Yeah, yeah.

And it's not being used for anything, so- So, if you were in charge of government, let

me ask you this.

If you were in charge of government, what would be your upper limit for the number of

people who could move to Australia, from the world, in, in any year?

I couldn't give a number because I, I don't know how many people ... I don't know, I couldn't

give you a number.

Well, right now it's about 190,000 coming in a year in a population of what, 20, 25

million or so, 25 million I think.

So, would you increase that?

I think yeah, I think we should let more people in, definitely.

And- But I think that we need to treat them better

when they arrive.

How so?

I don't think that, um, I mean, I'm a primary school teacher, uh, by trade.

Um, I don't think that it's fair that children are separated from their parents, who are

refugees.

And I don't think that refugee camps have, um, the resources and what we don't provide

refugee camps with the resources to accommodate people properly.

So- Right.

And as a primary, sorry to interrupt, as a primary school teacher do you teach the children

that the land was stolen and it's not particularly legitimate for them to be here?

Well that's two different things.

So the land could have been stolen but it is still legitimate for them to be here.

Well, I mean, I think that, that from the ... in, in terms of indigenous Australians,

that that is something that, um, we definitely need to still work on.

Um, this is weird, um, but in the same, same sentence, there, there are, there is enough

space to have other people.

Yeah, I think the indigenous- I don't ... I'm sorry, I don't think-

The indigenous- But-

The indigenous thing that I'm talking about is taking their land from them, right?

And not giving them rights to, like, sacred places that, you know, was part of their original-

Well, they were hunter gathers though, they weren't particularly land owners in the way-

Yes, they were.

... that Europeans were, right?

Yes, they were.

Yes, they were.

Yeah.

Right, right.

Well I really thank you for your time, I appreciate that.

Sorry.

That's really helped me to understand.

Thank you.

So we're just trying to sort of understand a little bit more about Australia and Australians

and so on, do you think that Australia is a White Supremacist nation?

Do you think there's a lot of white privilege here, or do you think it's more egalitarian?

Uh, yeah, yeah.

Well, I come from Brazil so compared to Brazil, that it like, um, has more black people, I

would say there has white privilege for sure.

I already had a few cases that, um, well, I'm a black girl so.

Um, yeah, but it, yeah has a white supremacy.

Especially like, uh, when you come people from the towns, I would say.

Like, uh- You said something happened to you, like you've

had some incidents with it?

What happened?

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Like, um, I don't know, like, uh, do you know dreadlocks?

Oh, yeah, yeah.

Yeah, so I did dreadlocks and they fire me at work.

For the dreadlocks?

Yeah.

Is that legal?

And do you think that there's more white supremacy in Australia or in Brazil?

Uh, yeah, in Australia for sure.

Yeah, because like here, they comes, uh, I think from the UK generation, so, uh, and

then because of the aboriginals they of course would ... like if they don't have the culture

of the aboriginals for example.

And back home we have the aboriginals culture for sure.

Do you think ... So you say that the British people, would they be more racist as a whole?

Uh, no it's not that they're the British.

I'm saying that the culture comes from, from like, a British culture that comes to Australia,

so it's not like aboriginal culture so, uh, especially for what happened in Australia.

Uh, you guys don't have like, Australia doesn't have the, the culture of the aboriginals so

is, uh, less, less, um, I don't know, you guys don't understand what is your, like Australia

doesn't understand much, what exactly the culture it came from, from the aboriginals.

Do you admire the aboriginal culture?

Yeah, yeah.

I completely- And what do you like about it?

I don't know, the music, the food, the rituals, the religious-

You know that in a lot of aboriginal cultures one of the punishments for women who disobeyed

the laws was mass rape?

Yeah, yeah, I know, I know- I'm going to assume that's not one of the

things that you admire.

Yeah, yeah, of course.

Yeah, yeah, well it's like, uh, as any culture, we did some mistakes.

Australia killed the aboriginals, and, uh, not because of these Australians a bad country,

it's just like, uh, sometimes they can not understand

What draws you to Australia ... sorry to interrupt, if you s- for you, Australia has more white

supremacy than Brazil, what is it that draws you to a country where you feel that you may

be more oppressed?

Um, well, I don't understand your question, sorry.

I asked ... so you say that there is more white privilege or white supremacy in Australia

as opposed to Brazil, but you moved to Australia, it seems odd if there's more white supremacy

that you would move to Australia.

Oh, yeah, yeah of course.

But it's like, uh, I didn't move to Australia because those things, like and I didn't expect

to have those problems here, I thought that there was a really well culture that like

everyone is welcome, and like, to come here and see, for example the LGBT, uh, like, uh,

still having problems with things like not approved the gay marriage, or Australia, about

the aboriginals don't bridge the ... uh, for example I was living in, uh, Miller's Point

and, uh, over there they have, uh, the aboriginals houses, and now they took it off for all the

aboriginals and the poor people.

To, to put like new people there for a house.

So, uh, this is fair, you know, like, they live there their entire life and one day Australia

give to them this house and now they, they took it, took it back, so-

Do you think there's a- They're taking it all for the, the, the privileged,

from the aboriginals.

Do you think that there could be a time when the debt is paid?

No, no I don't think that they- Goes on forever?

No, yeah.

(laughs) It should never end, like it should never

end.

(laughs) yeah, yeah.

Our grandchildren's, grandchildren's, grandchildren should still be paying tens of billions of

dollars a year to the aboriginals?

Yeah, uh, no, like, uh, I don't know, like need to change the cultures, it's not about

paying, it's about accepting- No it is kinda, 'cause lots of money goes

from the whites to the aborigines right?

Uh, yeah, yeah, of course.

Should that have to go on forever?

Or should that ever end do you think?

Uh, uh, actually need to analyze the cases because like, uh, back home we have quotes,

but it's like, it's not fair as well, because like, you, you pay the University for the

aboriginals, and you pay for the black people.

And like sometimes they have money and they have everything they need, you know.

Like, so there's actually a case to analyze in each to see what is the gaps?

Mmm.

In, in the aboriginals if they have the support, where is missing the support, is money that

they're gonna help, do they need like a school for them?

Yeah, yeah.

Like, because is actually like, no money going to them because like, at home we have money

come to the aboriginals but it's not enough.

But I'm sure that here in Australia is not the case.

Like you have money to, to pay the aboriginal but they need like, uh, it's a random.

All right well thank you very much for your time, I really appreciate it, it's most enjoyable.

Thank you.

Uh, thank you so much for taking the time today, we just wanted to know what you think

the biggest issues are in Australia these days.

Oh, okay.

No pressure, just go.

I think one of the biggest problems is probably,

uh, racism, and the stereotypes that are associated with that.

I feel like a lot of people kind of just see from the outside, um, especially for me, like

I grew up in the west, and now moving into, um, I guess, into the city and into the inner

west, you can see a whole, uh, cultural difference.

Um, I guess because of the lack of multiculturalism in the city and I guess the high schools that

were around here.

Um, like going ... in the west we had ... it was obviously very multicultural and, um,

yeah it's just interesting to see people my own age especially, and just like the kind

of lack of, like, cultural sensitivity and awareness.

Right.

So, racism is one of these words I always have trouble understanding-

Right.

'cause a lot of people use it in a lot of different ways.

Right.

So what's your definition?

I think it's a contextual thing.

Um, I think it ... as long as someone is offended by the outcome of something you've said, it's

completely valid if they, kind of accuse you for being racist or making a racist comment.

Oh, okay so if I say, like if I'm offended by something like white privilege-

Yes.

Then whoever uses the phrase white privilege is racist?

I would say so, I mean like, uh, or even in the context say if someone of a particular

race isn't present, and there's no one, I guess, to out you, in that situation, that

it doesn't mean that it's not, like- But people can be offended unreasonably, right?

So how do you know if the offense is reasonable or not?

I mean, that's the problem then, it's always, um, like predisposed.

And also, I'm also concerned ... I'm sorry.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

I'm also concerned that if we say that to be offended is, is a big problem, that we're

kind of giving a big tool to people that pretend to be offended to then cause trouble, rather

than who are genuinely offended.

Oh yeah.

That's definitely right.

I feel like for me, I always would put priority to minority groups I guess.

Um, maybe that's my ... Oh like the whites in South Africa?

Yeah, I guess so.

'Cause they're the minority right?

They're the minority group, yeah.

Yeah.

Um- Do you think that, uh, being in the minority

gives you kind of a leg up in terms of cries of racism?

In other words, do you think that if you are the majority, you, uh, are always racist in

a disagreement with a minority?

Always racist?

Yeah.

I mean well, that just comes from you just not being able to understand where they're

coming from.

So then being the majority, you can't place yourself into, uh, what a minority has seen,

or what they've been through.

So that again, that would apply in any context as well.

Right, now with regards to immigration, would you say that immigration to Australia running

about just a little under about 200,000 a year, do you think that's too low?

Do you think that's about right?

Do you think that should be higher?

I think it should be higher.

Why's that?

Uh, well coming from a family, an immigrant family, and a family where, um, my parents

came here fleeing a war.

From where?

From Iraq.

Ah, yeah.

Okay.

Wait, the war?

The 2003 invasion?

Yeah.

My sympathies for that by the way.

Yeah, so that's what they were fleeing, and I can say that like, my family and extended

family, contributing to, um, the community here as much as anyone else is.

But then people wouldn't really know that.

Like when I talk or converse with my friends, they would be like, all taken back by that

'cause they think I might be like, loud and proud about it.

But like no, we're completely- But there are a lot of immigrants and refugees

who aren't contributing in a net sense- Yeah.

... to the Australian economy.

I mean well like that's, there'll be many factors to that, that apply to, um, you can

even say they're full of low ... like I came from black town, low socioeconomic area, you

could say that the white majority as well there, weren't contributing to economic status

there as well.

Yes, but white as a whole are net taxpayers, so ... in, in Australia.

You can always find pockets of differences.

Yeah.

Well let me ask you this, so about 190,000 at the moment, where do you think it should

be ideally.

Like if you were in charge of Australia- Yeah.

You got to set immigration policy, where would you put it?

Uh, I mean, we should be looking at different countries.

I think there should be a kind of standard uphold.

I'm not really sure about the statistics on that.

Just not, oh, do you think it should be double, triple, from where it is now?

Double.

So, close to 400,000?

Yeah, 300-400.

Do you think that 500,000 would be too high?

I don't think it would be too high, but- What number, I'm just curious.

What number would be too high?

Oh.

'Cause you know, there's only a certain amount of infrastructure and schools and healthcare

and dentistry.

Yeah, that's true.

Like, what is the number that's too high?

Well I'm just thinking about the context of, um, people fleeing like, war right now and

how I don't think we've done much to help them.

And even in, um, just our offshore, like we're ... stuff happening in Manus Island, like

they should be, I think they should be brought into-

I still need a number, if you don't mind.

What's your top number?

Oh, we'll go 400, double now.

So 400,000?

Yeah.

So, anything over 400,000 would be bad?

I don't think it would be bad, I just think, you know, I was giving a number. Yeah, yeah, that's fine.

Yeah.

So over 10 years, so that's 4,000,000 people, right?

Out of a population of 25,000,000 people.

Yeah.

So you know, you got like 20% over 10 years, and do you think that should grow with the

population?

Be 500,000, 600,000, year after year?

I think it should reflect what's happening in the world at the moment.

Yeah.

Do you think that other countries other than white countries, should be required to take

in refugees?

Because, you know, Saudi Arabia doesn't, Yemen- Yeah.

That's true.

Like other countries don't.

Why do you think it's only white countries that should take in the refugees?

Because we're coming from a place of privilege, um, we've kind of already set that up, I mean,

um, in terms of Saudi Arabia, uh, uh Saudi Arabia, um-

So if we were a dictatorship, we wouldn't have to take anyone in.

So being a democracy means we have to take everyone in.

Well people, people want to come here, is the thing.

Well of course they do.

I don't think people want to go to like a dictatorship.

Oh no, lots of people wanna get, no lot's of people wanna go to Saudi Arabia, there

are tons of guest workers in Saudi Arabia, they'd love to stay but they're not allowed.

So do you think that white countries are more free and desirable for people because of just

privilege, or do you think it was fought for and bled for and, an you know, we fought against

the kings, the aristocrats, the priests and someone, to try and make a free society, do

you think it's just random privilege or do you think historical will that made the white

countries more free and desirable?

I mean, I don't think I have a sense of, um- 'Cause if you'd of said privilege then-

Yeah.

All white countries have to take in everyone around the world forever.

Now when whites become a minority in their own country, do you think they'll be well

treated?

No, 'cause I don't think that would work anyway.

So why would whites wanna become a minority in their own country?

I don't think anyone wants to become a minority.

But that, the, the positions that you, I'm just giving you the larger-

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

The positions that you have would result in whites becoming a minority I their own country.

I mean like- Look how it's working in South Africa, right?

That'd be interesting because, um, coming from a minority myself-

You fled being a minority in Iraq, right?

Yeah, yeah.

So why would you want ... do you think there would be any sense or reason for whites wanting

to become a minority in their own countries?

No, but it would just be interesting for the fact that, um, I guess people who will never

understand or never will understand what it's like to be a minority, to come from an immigrant

family.

But it's bad, right?

It's bad.

I wouldn't wish that- So why would white's, why would white's want

to become- On anyone.

(laughs) But you are wishing it, you are wishing it

upon the white's in Australia by wanting these huge immigration policies, you are wishing

it for the white's in Australia and you're saying it's a terrible thing to happen.

Well, I just think right now in this political climate, uh, they should have more things,

um- Who?

We should have, as a white country with lots of privilege, and, and a democratic nation

with um- It's not privilege though, is it?

I mean white countries who've fought for ... just like all other countries.

Yeah.

It didn't just ... it's not like God's beam of light came down and just gave these wonderful

gifts to white countries.

I mean, we don't really wanna go into where how Australia was fought for, so, yeah.

You, you do don't you?

The aborigines- Well now, if you're talking about that, then

I don't think that's just at all.

So the aborigines who were a minority in their own country when the whites came, how did

that work out for them?

Yeah.

Well nowhere near, yeah.

Badly.

Yeah.

So if it was bad for the aborigines to be minorities in their own countries and to be

harmed, isn't it also bad then for whites to be minorities in their own countries and

be harmed?

Yeah, but, I don't ... it's just not how it's going to work, it just never-

That's not an answer, you know that.

... will work like that.

That's not an argument.

It's just, it's just how everything's ever worked out.

Okay, so let's say, let's say that Muslims become a majority.

Yes.

In, I mean, with Iraq right.

Let's say the Muslims become a majority in Australia.

Yeah.

How do you think that's going to work out for the Christians?

See, it's such a hot debate, they have to send the fire engines.

Okay, so, in that, I would say if you go to a nation where it's a Christian majority,

what are the implications of that?

You mean for Muslims?

Yeah.

Muslims are allowed to practice their religion in Christian majority countries.

Exactly.

Are Christians allowed to practice their religion in Muslim majority countries?

In other words, lots of mosques are being built in Europe, do you think a lot of Churches

are being built in Saudi Arabia?

No I don't think there's a Christian majority though.

I know, so what that means is that if you have a Christian majority, you can have a

mosque, but if you have a Muslim majority, often times you can't have a church.

So if Muslims become a majority in Australia what's going to happen to the Christians do

you think?

And why would they want that?

Well I honestly think nothing would change.

You think nothing would change?

Yeah.

So you don't think Muslims want to impose Sharia Law in countries where they become

majorities?

No, I don't think that, no.

Do you have any example of a history, a country in history where Muslims gained a majority

where they didn't impose Sharia Law.

I'm just going off my personal like, experiences and personal relationships with other Muslims.

Yes.

All right, well I really, really appreciate your time.

Thank you so much.

It was a great chat.

Thank you, no worries.

Thank you.

Well thanks so much for taking the time.

Hi.

So you were watching an interview I did earlier- Yes I was.

... and I think I may have gotten a little bit of dagger look.

What do you call it in Australia when you're like, looks could kill?

Um, the stare of a magpie.

The stare of a magpie, all right.

Do you wanna give me one, like what were you looking at me as?

Ohh okay, that's chilling.

All right, so what is it that you didn't like about what I was saying?

You were talking about white, like whites being a minority in Australia.

I mean like, it's obvious we're colonizers, like…

So does that mean numer...

Does that mean numerically you can't become a minority?

It's like, I just don't see the world that way, I don't know, like, I am, I see myself

as a minority because I'm not solely white, I'm a person.

And I have ... I come from the love tribe of the world.

You come from the love tribe of the world?

Yes.

Do you think that's a majority tribe or a minority tribe these days?

I don't see a distinction.

Right, so do you think that immigration should be as much as Australia could possibly handle?

Like there's billions of people who wanna live in Australia.

about immigration, it's like the most complex thing.

It is and it isn't.

There is plenty of land in Australia.

Yes, okay, but there's infrastructure too right?

'Cause most of the people that immigrate to Australia wanna live in the cities, right?

Which means less- Not necessarily.

I know the majority of them do wanna live in the cities.

Like, they don't come from, from India to go live in the Outback right?

There's enough people in the world needing a place to live for people to start to build

their own new towns again.

You know, everyone just wants the new town feeling don't they?

And we live in Newtown, they just want the new town.

Now, let me ask you this though.

So right now about 190,000 people coming into Australia every year.

Do you think that's too low?

Um, look you just like, you just asked me questions about immigration to do with like

... I guess your angle is that it is too ...

No, no, don't try to read my mind, just tell me what you think.

Should it be higher than two, a 190,000, should it be lower, is it about right?

Um, Australia should be wide open to, um, whoever needs to escape, uh, difficult conditions

that they're living in to come to a country that's kind of free.

All right, so, would, would you say a million, two million a year, if, if-

I'm not gonna give numbers, I'm just saying- But more.

I don't know.

Now what if those people came from Muslim countries?

What if they were majority Muslims, do you think that that would be any challenge for

you?

I, I'm not, like, there is no challenge, it's diversity, biodiversity.

Biodiversity?

Do you think that Islamic Law or Islamic practices would have any challenge for your lifestyle?

No.

You don't think that Muslims have any problem with your lifestyle?

Oh, fuck off, I'm done with it.

I guess not.

For more infomation >> 'Does Australia Have White Privilege?' | Stefan Molyneux Interviews Australians - Duration: 23:53.

-------------------------------------------

Louis The Child - Better Not ft. Wafia (Sad Wolves Remix) [Lyrics] - Duration: 3:18.

♪ ♪

♪ I KNOW ♪

♪ IT'S HARD TO ADMIT IT THAT YOU FOUND LOVE ♪

♪ IT'S HARD TO STAY IN IT ♪

♪ BUT HE'S BETTER ♪

♪ THAN ANYONE I'VE SEEN YOU WITH BEFORE ♪

♪ SO TALK TO ME ♪

♪ TELL ME 'BOUT ♪

♪ ALL YOUR INSECURITIES ♪

♪ AND I'M TRYING TO MAKE YOU SEE WHAT I SEE ♪

♪ YOU'RE HAPPIER THAN I'VE EVER SEEN YOU ♪

♪ ♪

♪ IT'S TRUE LOVE, DON'T FAKE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ IT'S RIGHT HERE, DON'T WASTE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ DON'T SAY YOU CAN'T FIGURE IT OUT, FIGURE IT OUT ♪

♪ I KNOW YOU CAN FIGURE IT OUT, FIGURE IT OUT ♪

♪ IT'S TRUE LOVE, DON'T WASTE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ ♪

♪ DON'T OVERTHINK IT ♪

♪ LET IT GO AND TRY TO TRUST THE FEELING ♪

♪ YOU KNOW IT IN YOUR GUT, YOU'RE HEALING ♪

♪ FROM EVERY TIME THAT YOU'VE BEEN HURT BEFORE ♪

♪ I SEE IT, I SEE IT ♪

♪ IT'S TRUE LOVE, DON'T FAKE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ IT'S RIGHT HERE, DON'T WASTE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ DON'T SAY YOU CAN'T FIGURE IT OUT, FIGURE IT OUT ♪

♪ I KNOW YOU CAN FIGURE IT OUT, FIGURE IT OUT ♪

♪ IT'S TRUE LOVE, DON'T WASTE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ I KNOW YOU CAN FIGURE IT OUT, FIGURE IT OUT ♪

♪ IT'S TRUE LOVE, DON'T WASTE IT ♪

♪ DON'T SAY YOU CAN'T FIGURE IT OUT, FIGURE IT OUT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ IT'S TRUE LOVE, DON'T FAKE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER NOT ♪

♪ IT'S RIGHT HERE ♪

♪ DON'T WASTE IT ♪

♪ YOU BETTER, YOU BETTER NOT ♪

For more infomation >> Louis The Child - Better Not ft. Wafia (Sad Wolves Remix) [Lyrics] - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

Bruit De La Nature & Cloches Tibétaines - Dormir - Sommeil - Relaxation - Duration: 3:00:19.

Nature Noise & Tibetan Bells - Sleep - Sleep - Relaxation

For more infomation >> Bruit De La Nature & Cloches Tibétaines - Dormir - Sommeil - Relaxation - Duration: 3:00:19.

-------------------------------------------

Trailer pra lanches - kiko trucks - Duration: 1:25.

For more infomation >> Trailer pra lanches - kiko trucks - Duration: 1:25.

-------------------------------------------

5 Unexpected Chilling Things Captured By Drone - Duration: 6:23.

5 Unexpected Chilling Things Captured By Drone

Unknown scary thing caught by drone in the cemetery

A vehicle escapes flash flood waters in Saudi Arabia

. Drone captured UFO flying at incredible speeds

Ghost caught by drone camera

Bigfoot caught on video by drone camera

For more infomation >> 5 Unexpected Chilling Things Captured By Drone - Duration: 6:23.

-------------------------------------------

#FISA: Obama Era Political Spying Tool Disclosed! - Duration: 7:09.

Hi, welcome to Declassified, I'm your host, Gina Shakespeare

On this episode, unlawful FISA spying was widespread under Obama administration

How the relaxation of privacy policies paved the way for FBI and NSA to spy on Americans

The story is from Epoch Times editor in chief of the U.S. editions Jasper Fakkert

The FBI and the National Security Agency (NSA), under the Obama administration,

committed numerous violations of procedures intended to safeguard Americans' personal data

and communications collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)

Under the section, which was part of amendments to FISA passed in 2008 under President George W. Bush,

the intelligence community has broad powers to collect internet and telephone data to spy on foreign nationals

Procedures to protect Americans' data collected under the program

were weakened under President Barack Obama in 2011,

allowing the NSA to search through Americans' data using their names

Previously, these types of searches, known as "queries using United States person identifiers," were prohibited

In its ruling in 2011, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) said

the "relaxation of the querying rules" would be limited to queries

"reasonably likely to yield foreign intelligence information."

The FISC at the time also approved the broader collection of so-called upstream data,

which is all internet data traveling through key internet backbone carriers

However, in subsequent years, policies intended to defend against the misuse of this power,

called minimization and targeting procedures,

were systematically broken, resulting in numerous violations

A declassified top-secret FISC report released in April 2017

revealed that the NSA had an 85 percent noncompliance rate

when it came to searches involving Americans

The 702 system, which was never designed to spy on Americans,

but rather to safeguard U.S. national security,

had become a powerful spying tool in the hands of the government

Problems with the FISA system received nationwide attention in February

after a declassified House committee memo

revealed that the FBI and the Department of Justice

had obtained a FISA warrant on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page,

using information paid for by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC)

The initial warrant, and its three subsequent renewals could have been used to spy on anyone

who was in contact with Page,

including members of the Trump campaign

The NSA is allowed to analyze communications "two hops" from its original target

Anyone in direct communication with Page is one hop away,

and anyone in communication with those talking to Page is two hops away

Last year, it was already revealed that top Obama officials, including national security adviser Susan Rice

and U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power,

used so-called unmasking requests to obtain communications

belonging to specific members of the Trump campaign and transition team

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said on March 7 that he has appointed a person outside of Washington

to look into the allegations of FISA abuse

Sessions's statement came in response to a letter signed by 13 members of Congress

calling for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate the alleged abuse

According to the declassified top-secret FISC report,

the FBI provided access to sensitive 702 data to employees

that were not authorized to have access to the data

In some cases, this data was then exported by the employees

and it is unclear how it was subsequently used

The agency also provided contractors with access to raw 702 data

The contractors maintained access to the data, even after their work for the FBI was finished

In one case, an unauthorized private entity was given access by the FBI to 702 data

The unnamed private entity is mostly staffed by private contractors

whose access to 702 data was not controlled or monitored

In its report, the FISC wrote "contractors had access to raw FISA information

that went well beyond what was necessary to respond to the FBI's requests,"

The FBI discontinued the private entity's access to raw FISA data in April 2016,

the same month in which the Clinton campaign and the DNC used law firm Perkins Coie

to retain Fusion GPS to produce the so-called Trump dossier

The dossier would eventually lead to the FBI obtaining the FISA warrant on Carter Page in October 2016

While the FISC did recertify the FBI's minimization procedures as b eing constitutional

it wrote that it was "nonetheless concerned about the FBI's apparent disregard of minimization rules

and whether the FBI may be engaging in similar disclosures of

raw Section 702 information that have not been reported."

The scope of the FBI's accessing of Americans' data is unclear,

as the government is not required to provide the FISC with numbers on violations

In the NSA's case, it told the court that it was unable to provide a number for how many times Americans' data

had been unlawfully accessed

The scope of the NSA's violations also remains unclear

In response to the problems, as well as an internal review by the agency,

the NSA stopped the collection of what are called multicommunication transactions (MCTs)

to minimize violations

The term MCTs refers to the NSA's mass collection of communications while targeting one communication

The FBI and CIA will no longer have access to upstream data collected by the NSA at key internet junctions

In January, President Donald Trump ordered his director of national intelligence

to develop procedures for law enforcement agencies to obtain the identities of Americans in intelligence reports

This practice of unmasking is what was used to spy on the Trump campaign during the elections

Trump did authorize Section 702 in January for another six years

stressing the importance of the program for national security

If you would like to look more deeply into how safeguard to protect Americans from

having their personal data accessed where repeatedly broken

Please refer to our comprehensive infographic

The link is in the description below

Once again, thank you for watching and be sure to subscribe, like and hit the notification's button

You can also hit to our social media,

we're on Twitter and Facebook, the links are in the description below

From all of us at Declassified, take care

For more infomation >> #FISA: Obama Era Political Spying Tool Disclosed! - Duration: 7:09.

-------------------------------------------

Kempetai | Man In The High Castle - Duration: 5:00.

Over the course of the Pacific War, the Empire of Japan and the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity

Sphere occupied territories across half the world.

The flag of the Rising Sun was flown across the northernmost reaches of Siberia all the

way to India, China, the Dutch East Indies, Australia, Chile, the Pacific States of America,

and everywhere in-between.

With the surrender of the allied nations, the last elements of resistance in these territories

were crushed by the Imperial Japanese Army, but to maintain control and consolidate their

conquered peoples under Imperial rule, the Empire turned to the Kempeitai.

Roughly analogous to the military police utilized by the former Western Powers, the Kempeitai

was first established in 1881.

While initially modeled on the National Gendarmerie of France, its military, executive, judicial,

and police functions were continually amended and broadened as the Empire pursued expansionist

policies.

It's role became clear in 1907 with the occupation and later annexation of Korea,

in which Kempeitai forces assisted in preserving the peace and suppressing anti-Japanese sentiment.

During the border skirmishes of the 1920s and 30s, in which many foreign territories

fell under Japanese military occupation, the Kempeitai began recruiting a large number

of locals to serve as auxiliaries.

By the height of the Second World War, it had expanded to tens of thousands of officers

stationed across the Empire.

Kempeitai agents formed valuable connections with the German Abwehr and Italian Servizio

Informazioni Militare.

Mutual points of contact such as the Penang Submarine base in former British Malaya allowed

for technological and information exchanges.

With the capitulation of the allies, the Kempeitai expanded or established headquarters and field

offices across the whole of the Prosperity Sphere.

Their officers and agents became responsible for issuing travel permits, recruiting members

of the local populace for labor or axillary duty, handling counter-intelligence services,

and anti-ideological work.

The Kempeitai have become especially critical in the Japanese Pacific States, where resentment

and resistance towards the Japanese backed government still lingers.

The Neutral Zone, separating the Pacific States from the Greater Germanic Reich, has become

a hotbed of criminal activity and the greatest criminal syndicates of the Yakuza have quickly

expanded their operations across the Americas.

Occasional crackdowns have led to gunfights in the streets of San Francisco and elsewhere

between the Kempeitai and various syndicates.

Organized armed resistance, while largely subdued since the end of the war, is not

unknown and occasional raids are made against those who would harbor enemies of the state

or suspected insurrectionists.

It is not uncommon for targeted individuals to be taken from their homes in the night.

Kempeitai methods, while brutal, are especially effective.

An assassination attempt on the life of the Crown Prince has proven the continued need

for vigilance while a recent bombing of the Kempeitai's headquarters in the Nippon Building

within San Francisco suggests that anti-Japanese elements are better equipped than previously

believed.

The Empire of Japan cannot afford any sign of weakness.

The death of Hitler has shattered any guarantees of peace and the Greater Germanic Reich cannot

be trusted to be content with only half the world.

Internal unrest can not be allowed to be persist, and the success of the Kempeitai might decide

the fate of the Empire.

Thanks to Lee Shorten for providing the narration for today's episode.

Lee plays Sergeant Yoshida of the Kempeitai on The Man In The High Castle, which will

be returning for its third season on October 5th.

You can also watch him play Rebel General Ikari on September 2nd when the fan film "Bucketheads

- A Star Wars Story" premieres at DragonCon in Atlanta.

A link to the trailer and his Twitter profile are in the description.

Speaking of DragonCon, both Marc and myself will be heading down to Atlanta to meet with

our friends Star Wars Explained and Spacedock, and we may be organizing a fan meetup while

we're there.

Follow us on Twitter or Facebook to keep up with the details.

For more infomation >> Kempetai | Man In The High Castle - Duration: 5:00.

-------------------------------------------

NutriBullet Pro 900 Series Blender Review - Duration: 1:41.

welcome to our Channel this week we are reviewing this nutribullet pro 900 this

series rivals traditional juicing and blending methods by breaking down stems

seeds and skins at an incredible speed the extractor blades and cyclonic action

generate the power to extract even more goodness from your ingredients and

contribute to a smoother drinking experience it comes with two cups one

lead one blade one handle and lead along with the heavy motor simply load the

torque up place on the high torque power base then twist and lock into place now

you're ready to go births open seeds cracks through stems

and shreds tough skins to help you consume the normal onions nutrients the

nutribullet pro extractor blade turns at an incredible twenty five thousand

rotation per minute to completely break down ingredients into delicious

spot-free nutriblast smoothie a quick rinse and you're good to go again

no fiddly parts to clean if you are planning to get one of these I have the

link in the description below that's all for today and see you next time with

another exciting video thank you

you

For more infomation >> NutriBullet Pro 900 Series Blender Review - Duration: 1:41.

-------------------------------------------

Marisol González 260818 - Duration: 2:31.

For more infomation >> Marisol González 260818 - Duration: 2:31.

-------------------------------------------

Paul Stanley y Santiago Ramundo quedan en peligro de eliminación | MQB - Duration: 2:15.

For more infomation >> Paul Stanley y Santiago Ramundo quedan en peligro de eliminación | MQB - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

Wes Films Animated - Duration: 1:21.

Yeah, my spaceship is so fun!

Oh look! A planet!

Wow, fow

What is this place?

I think its the thing Wes calls.........Outside!

Whoa, Jerald is that you?

Whoa, so fun! So what do you-

Jerald? Is everything ok?

Why are you frozen?

What?? The pen died!

*Sigh*

Ill save drawing for another time

For more infomation >> Wes Films Animated - Duration: 1:21.

-------------------------------------------

How to Make a World-Record-Breaking Paper Airplane - Duration: 3:20.

So you want to make the world's farthest-traveling paper airplane.

The technique you learned in school won't cut it.

When making a paper plane, there are four things to consider:

No. 1: The Paper

Paper is measured in the weight of a ream—500 pages.

The average copier paper in the U.S. is 20-24 pound stock.

Guinness World Record rules allow us to use paper that weighs up to 100 grams per square meter,

or about 26.4 pounds.

Paper that heavy usually comes in A4—an international paper size not commonly used in the U.S.

John Collins, the paper plane designer who currently holds the world-record,

says you want paper that's been photocopied on.

The heat process from the photocopy machine stiffens the paper.

And the ink is not actually ink, it's a microfine layer of plastic.

Those two things—the heat and the plastic—help the paper hold a crease.

Use something that's in the recycle bin, you know?

And don't use something that's been printed on.

That ink will hurt the fibers of the paper.

You want something that's been photocopied onto if you're using recycled papers.

No. 2: Forces and Center of Gravity

For any paper airplane, you'll have to deal with two major forces during your flight:

lift, or upward force, and drag, or backward force.

Your plane needs to generate more lift than drag to go up.

When more drag is generated than lift, the plane falls.

You have to engineer in a way for the plane to gain speed to counteract drag.

You put a small bend at the back of the plane, upward, so that when the plane has gained

sufficient speed, there's enough air bouncing off of that upward bend to deflect the tail

back down and that pulls the nose up and now it's level again.

When designing your aerial vehicle, you'll want to make sure the wings are bent upwards.

This is called a positive dihedral angle, and helps the plane to correct itself if it starts to sway.

When one wing dips too low, it produces extra lift and the plane will return to its center of gravity.

No. 3: Location! Location! Location!

It's not easy to find a space big enough to break this world record.

Collins' world-record breaking airplane was thrown by quarterback Joe Ayoob

at the McClellan Air Force Base in Sacramento, CA.

And Collins says you need the perfect weather conditions.

All of our best throwing days were 52 to 62 degrees, 25-30% humidity.

If the air thickness is wrong, or if the wings aren't stiff enough to take care of the

air quality, the plane tends to die in that last third.

You want perfectly stable.

No. 4: The Throw

The best form isn't like a pitcher in baseball, or even like an NFL quarterback.

It's like a javelin thrower.

The great thing about Joe is that he had a way, a knowledge, of changing his throw to

match the sport that really was invaluable in looking at

how to throw the paper airplane the best way.

We worked together for about 18 months and he was working on his throwing technique the whole time.

To summarize: Find 100 GSM A4 paper, design your plane with the proper center of gravity

and center of lift, and throw it the right way in the right place under the right conditions.

Congrats, you're now a world record holder.

For more infomation >> How to Make a World-Record-Breaking Paper Airplane - Duration: 3:20.

-------------------------------------------

9 aliments de votre cuisine qui aident à déboucher vos artères - Duration: 4:47.

For more infomation >> 9 aliments de votre cuisine qui aident à déboucher vos artères - Duration: 4:47.

-------------------------------------------

Schweinsteiger inducted to FC Bayern Hall of Fame - Rudy signs for Schalke - Duration: 3:21.

Of course, it's a great honour to enter the Hall of Fame at such a big club

along with all the other great personalities.

A great award for a truly great player in the history of FC Bayern:

Bastian Schweinsteiger was inducted, as the 18th member,

into the FC Bayern Hall of Fame on Monday afternoon.

It's a great moment for me, I'm very proud to be here

as I come from this area and it means an awful lot to me.

The outstanding significance of Bastian Schweinsteiger to the club and his special relationship

with Bayern were also highlighted by chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge and president Uli Hoeneß.

He was always Mister Bayern: He grew up in Kolbermoor,

matured through our youth teams and then had a great career at Bayern Munich.

Basti was always a rascal and always made the big and small mistakes

that make a rascal. As a club we had to rein him in at times,

and I think that did him good because he turned into a fantastic player.

On Monday morning Schweinsteiger accepted a great honour from Bavarian Minister-President

Markus Söder at his official residence.

The 34-year-old player, born in Upper Bavaria, was presented with the Bavarian Order of Merit

at Prinz-Carl-Palais in the state chancellery.

Yes, it was a special moment for me as a true Bavarian to receive an award like that.

That's very prestigious in my estimation and I'd really like to thank

the Minister- President for being able to take part in an event like this.

I'm really overwhelmed.

After the special award on Monday, Schweinsteiger could well be overwhelmed

by his farewell game on Tuesday.

I'm looking forward to the moment when I'm back at the Allianz Arena, seeing the fans

and also sharing it with my new team-mates

as well as meeting my former FC Bayern team-mates.

Sebastian Rudy will not feature in Schweinsteiger's farewell match

as the midfielder has signed for Schalke 04.

FC Bayern thank the 28-year-old for his service and wish him all the best for the future.

Rudy joined the record champions a year ago and won

the 2017/18 league title with Bayern.

For more infomation >> Schweinsteiger inducted to FC Bayern Hall of Fame - Rudy signs for Schalke - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

A Woman Couldn't Sleep For 9 Days. This Is What Happened To Her Colon. - Duration: 10:42.

A Woman Couldn't Sleep for 9 Days.

The medicine she used to help her sleep was less than optimal.

This Is What Happened To Her Colon.

JD is a 27 year old woman, presenting to the emergency room, unconscious.

Her boyfriend Jeff tells the admitting nurse at admission that she had been awake for the

last 48 hours before complaining of severe nausea.

You see, JD had been experiencing a strange insomnia over the past 7 months.

Some nights she would lay in bed, tossing and turning while hearing the morning traffic

build up in her window.

Some mornings, she would dreadfully watch the sun rise.

Without sleep, her quality of life began to rapidly deteriorate.

She was an attorney, and her job performance began to suffer, as she would have trouble

making court dates.

She began losing interest in her hobbies and her relationship began to suffer as she blamed

Jeff for the insomnia, but even after his absence, her sleep trouble worsened.

10 years ago, JD was diagnosed with a mild depression.

She was started on a low dose of quetiapine, with good results and never missed a dose

nor had any complaints about it.

About 3 months ago, JD began trying supplements to help her sleep.

Some nights, she'd sleep great, and others, she'd be wide awake for 2 consecutive nights,

exhausted by the third day.

Some supplements, became many supplements.

She'd mix and match, and take much more than she needed until finally, nothing worked.

She consulted a neurologist for her problems, who prescribed her cognitive behavioral therapy,

but in it, she found limited success.

She finally moved on to over the counter medication.

She started taking the PM branding of a drug named diphenhydramine, which helps with allergies

but also makes one drowsy.

It helped her sleep every night for a whole week, but she noticed that the medicine would

give her not only stomach pain, but also constipation.

Sometimes, she'd sit for 30 minutes, with limited movement, but finally being able to

sleep gave her new life.

Inevitably, the insomnia came back.

JD began to escalate the dose each night until she would take 4 to 5 times the recommended

dose each night to sleep just a few hours, before waking up unrefreshed and exhausted.

One evening, she was at dinner with Jeff.

She barely ate.

She told him that she hadn't had a bowel movement nor slept more than just a few hours for 9 days.

He stayed with her over night to make sure she'd be ok.

Her skin became pale as she started complaining of nausea and stomach pain.

Jeff fell asleep but as he woke up, he found her laying on her side, in a pool of cold

sweat, huddled up and unresponsive.

In a panic, he called 911 and she was brought to the emergency room where we are now.

Given this history of present illness, there are several clues as to what's happening.

At physical examination, JD was immediately identified to be in shock.

Her blood pressure was low and her heart, to compensate for this hypotension, was beating

at 150 beats per minute, 3 times that of average.

And she was completely unresponsive.

An abdominal CT scan finds that JD has Acute Megacolon.

Mega meaning enlargement and referring to the dilatation of the colon, or the large intestines

Acute meaning that there are no underlying pathophysiologic conditions that are leading

to this problem except for the massive doses of diphenhydramine JD consumed for her sleep,

which leads us to the first clue.

Diphenhydramine is an allergy medicine.

In most parts of the body, it blocks the chemical named histamine which is responsible for most

common allergic reactions, like itching from mosquito bites, and sneezing from pollen.

But in the brain, diphenhydramine blocks a different chemical that transmits signals.

This means that small amounts leads to mild sedation, helping with sleep, but by affecting

the brain and its nerves, diphenhydramine also slows down the digestive system, which

receives signals from the brain.

Large amounts of diphenhydramine can lead to an almost complete stoppage of the digestive

system which brings us back to the name of JD's condition Acute Megacolon.

If she had no bowel movements for 9 days, and CT scan did not reveal any mechanical

obstructions in her colon, then it means nothing was specifically blocking the way in her intestines.

But if that's the case, then why is her colon dilated?

Why is it megacolon?

Well, there's a few things to be known here.

First, the stomach and intestines form their own set of nerves called the enteric nervous

system, sometimes called the second brain.

This "second brain," controls the muscles of your bowel and cannot be actively controlled

by you, meaning you can't force your stomach to contract at will like you can your biceps.

But if the first brain in the head and the second brain in the gut both use the same

chemicals to transmit signals along the nerves, and JD's sleep medicine diphenhydramine

blocks the chemicals from transmitting signals in those nerves, then it means that high doses

of JD's sleep medicine were slowing down her gut to a high degree.

Inside the colon, because the digestive system is a giant tube from your mouth to the other

end, the pressure stays constant within, meaning that if one part is dilated, the pressure

has more or less, stayed the same and hasn't dropped.

This means that the tension at the wall of the dilated segment is elevated, and as the

colon keeps slowing down from high doses of diphenhydramine, and as tension keeps building

up, then blood can't flow through it, meaning those blood vessels will begin to crush up

against the sides of the wall, starving the tissue of oxygen as it slowly begins to necrose,

or quite literally die.

This necrotic tissue begins to lose it's muscular integrity, and as time continued

through JD's abdominal pain and distention starting from several days ago, the walls

of her colon began to weaken so much, that they finally perforated, spilling her intestinal

contents into her peritoneal cavity, causing bacteria from the gut to spill into her blood

stream, as they begin to flow freely, all throughout her body.

Just like how when you get an infection on your skin it becomes swollen, red and warm,

an infection that spreads into your blood causes your entire body to become "swollen,"

which translates to the body sending white blood cells systemically, promoting inflammation.

Because JD's situation isn't self-limiting, meaning it isn't containing itself, her

blood vessels have begun to vasodilate, causing her blood pressure to drop.

Her heart detects this and begins to beat faster in order to compensate for the loss

in pressure so that her organs can still receive blood, but as her brain starts to lose oxygen,

JD loses consciousness.

This dramatic escalation in signs and symptoms due to colonic perforation is known as septic shock

and means almost imminent death in JD's case, if treatment isn't initiated within

the next few minutes.

The notion of motor dysfunction in the gastrointestinal system is a persistent underlying theme that

has far reaching implications when it comes to seemingly unrelated causes of disease in

humans.

Opioids for pain control in the hospital can often cause gastric hypomotility.

This is a time when constipation becomes a common occurrence leading to fecal impaction.

If the patient is elderly and doesn't receive a stool softener, then it means they will

have to strain to pass a movement.

If they strain hard enough, their heart will temporarily stop and they can rupture blood

vessels in the brain causing a stroke, which leads to cerebral vasospasm days later, which can starve

the brain of oxygen leading to brain damage.

In the case of gastroesophageal reflux disease, stomach acid commonly splashes into the esophagus,

which isn't equipped to handle the low pH.

While laying down, this acid can enter the bronchioles of the lungs and trigger asthma

as well as damage the larynx and erode the enamel of the teeth.

The integrity of the esophageal mucus membrane is disrupted and the cells are damaged, leading

to Barrett's Esophagus which predisposes the patient to esophageal cancer, which can then undergo

a malignant transformation and then spread all throughout the body.

A common inflammatory bowel disease known as Crohn's Disease affects any part of the

digestive tract, at all layers of the bowel walls.

This is a state of mucosal inflammation that can seep into the smooth muscle of the colon,

paralyzing it, causing it to dilate.

The deep ulcerated parts of the intestines begin to degenerate and necrose as white blood

cells begin to swell into the tissue, causing it to rupture, giving way to toxic megacolon,

a more chronic condition with an underlying pathophysiology compared to JD's acute megacolon.

Her history of present illness all point to this.

The prior stomach pain.

The nausea.

The high doses of diphenhydramine in a desperate attempt to finally fall asleep.

Since the onset of shock appears to be relatively recent, it may not yet be too late for her,

she could still be resuscitated.

The first line of treatment is to remove the source of bacteria spreading into her blood.

She is admitted immediately to surgery and at laparotomy, or incision into the abdominal

cavity, massive colonic distention was found with evidence of perforation.

Her small intestines, and distal parts of her rectum were found to be viable and her

entire colon was removed.

Admission into the intensive care unit led to immediate initiation of antibiotics and

early goal-directed resuscitation as her condition began to stabilize over the following days.

The final thing to note here, is that JD's condition sould have been easily caught by

any health care provider, at any point.

Diphenhydramine as a medicine is a well known anti-cholinergic.

If a cholinergic does things like promote smooth muscle movement in the digestive system

and promote a "rest and digest" state of the body, then an anti-cholinergic prevents

digestive system movement.

Do you remember that quetiapine that JD was taking for her depression?

Well, quetiapine is also a well known anti-cholinergic, meaning the dangerous dual blockade of diphenhydramine

in large, prohibited doses in combination with quetiapine, which also exhibits anti-dopaminergic

and anti-serotonergic activity, both important neurotransmitters in "both" brains, virtually

stopped her digestive system from moving completely, and caused her colon to swell, crushing the

blood vessels, starving it of oxygen and causing the walls to perforate, leaking enteric contents

including gut bacteria into her blood.

JD's anticholinergic excess, produced from a drug interaction that should have been caught

by physicians, nurses and the pharmacist at the store where she bought the medicine, caused

this set of symptoms.

Luckily for her, it wasn't too late to begin early goal directed resuscitation in the intensive

care unit, and over a few weeks, her septic shock was resolved as she regained consciousness,

and her gut was surgically anastomosed, or rejoined together, without her colon.

And upon arriving home, a good nights sleep in her own bed, was waiting for her.

Thank you so much for watching.

Take care of yourself.

And Be well.

For more infomation >> A Woman Couldn't Sleep For 9 Days. This Is What Happened To Her Colon. - Duration: 10:42.

-------------------------------------------

How Does Reverse Psychology Work? - Duration: 5:02.

[♪ INTRO]

Hey, you know all those chores that you probably have to do?

Dishes, laundry, vacuuming?

Yeah, they're not important.

You should probably just forget about them.

I don't know if you actually feel any more motivated now... but reverse psychology is the idea

that you can persuade someone to do something by telling them not to do it.

It might seem like something that only works in cartoons, like a big red button that says

"DO NOT PUSH."

But researchers have studied reverse psychology and it does seem to have an effect on real people in certain situations.

When scientists talk about reverse psychology, they focus on something called reactance.

You know that "you can't tell me what to do!" feeling?

That's reactance.

This idea was first proposed in 1966, in a paper on psychological reactance theory that

synthesized a lot of thoughts and research about this internal process.

The author suggested that when we're given instructions to do a particular thing, we feel our freedom of choice becoming restricted.

For example, on your own, you can choose to do whatever you want — watch a movie, go to the park, eat a corndog...

But when you're told to do something specific, your freedom to choose other things feels like it's more limited.

Psychologically, that can be uncomfortable.

And that discomfort can motivate you to fight back to regain that freedom of choice.

So you might disobey.

Like, "No Mom, I'm not going to clean my room.

I'm going to, probably sort my Magic: The Gathering cards!"

If we are talking about me back in a high school.

Even if you didn't even want to sort your Magic: The Gathering cards, more options lead to less discomfort.

Of course, reverse psychology isn't just a thing for rebellious kids.

The research is mixed on whether younger or older people might be more susceptible to stronger reactance,

and it's tricky to compare ages because of other life factors.

But psychologists do know that people of all ages experience reactance, and in lots of situations

— from taking advice from a friend, to listening to a public health message.

For example, when the US drinking age was legally raised to 21 in the 1980s,

psychologists noted behavioral changes between college students of different ages.

One survey looked at 3,375 college students during the academic year between 1987 and 1988.

And they found that 81% of the students who were younger than 21 drank, versus 75% of students who were 21 and over.

Underage students also reportedly drank more heavily.

24% were considered more likely to make risky decisions or to be heavy drinkers — basically, having a lot of drinks fairly often.

Only 15% of legal drinkers were in this category.

You wouldn't expect such a drastic difference without some cause.

And sure, there are a lot of factors that go into the decision to drink.

But the researchers suggest that this trend was partially because students were reacting to limited freedom,

to re-establish a sense that they could choose whether to drink or not.

Another survey looked at 2,142 students from 10 schools in 1990.

And they saw significant differences in alcohol use if people were 21 or not, but not other drug use.

The researchers say that further supports the idea of reactance, because the changing drinking age was a big deal to behavioral freedom.

The kicker is, reactance can cause people to go against lots of best interests.

Even ignoring medical treatment plans from doctors.

A 2014 study that looked at depressed patients found a strong link between high levels of

reactance and refusal to take medications.

119 psychiatric outpatients being treated for depression were asked to fill out a number

of questionnaires, assessing their psychological reactance, how in control they felt, self-efficacy,

and how well they were adhering to the medications they'd been prescribed.

And their responses showed a distinct negative correlation between reactance and medication adherence.

In other words, stronger reactance meant they followed their treatment plan less.

The authors of the study concluded that it might be helpful for mental health professionals

to find ways to communicate with patients that avoid creating high levels of reactance.

One strategy could be giving patients more tools to make decisions,

instead of explicitly telling them to do or think something.

For example, Motivational Enhancement Therapy emphasizes patients' freedom of choice.

And these kinds of therapies are often used to treat cases of drug abuse or alcoholism.

Rather than a therapist pushing a particular choice, like, "stop taking all those drugs, dude,"

the therapist and patient work through the pros and cons of each approach to the issue.

This way, the patient hopefully feels less limited, and reactance is less likely.

Ideally, they're more likely to carefully weigh all the strategies and choose to take steps towards recovery.

We've all heard about this, you have to make people think it was their idea.

Reactance is just one of many factors that affects how likely someone is to take advice

— it's not a surefire way to persuade anyone.

But if you're feeling lucky with a stubborn nephew, who knows, maybe a little reverse psychology will do the trick.

Thank you for watching this episode of Scishow Psych!

If you enjoyed this video, definitely don't leave a comment, and don't you dare,

don't you dare subscribe!

[♪ OUTRO ]

For more infomation >> How Does Reverse Psychology Work? - Duration: 5:02.

-------------------------------------------

Overwatch MOST VIEWED Twitch Clips of The Week! #8 - Duration: 13:19.

intro

Overwatch twitch clips

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét