Thứ Hai, 29 tháng 10, 2018

Waching daily Oct 29 2018

Today's guests are a lady and two gentlemen who, for the past 3-4 years,

have done nothing other than making sure

that there's no reason to be ashamed of our country's pop music.

And therefore it is a special honor for me to give a warm welcome to these guys:

Kitschkrieg.

Hi

Hi

It's also a special premiere, because for the first time ever,

we have all members of Kitschkrieg together on one couch.

Applause for awhodat.

Chingching

And you are …

Fizzle

Fiji

Those are hopefully not the names your mothers gave you?

Hmm ( ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ) … not really, but they just stuck.

You don't choose your own nickname, and you never get rid of it either.

Tell me about it.

Anyway, you were all born in very different parts of this country,

but around the same time?

Yes, I'm all the way from the west,

originally from Krefeld by the Dutch border,

and I was born '79.

We should be sitting in a different order.

I'm from the zonal border, from Braunschweig,

and she was born all the way out east.

I'll take that as a yes.

Braunschweig ... I hope you're not into soccer.

So we can skip that whole topic, and finish half an hour early.

It's only going so-so at the moment, eh?

I barely remember anything about Braunschweig.

I found my microphone.

Oh, nice!

So "all the way out east", where would that be?

Uhm, really far out, by the Czech border.

So you're probably one of the very few people in this building

that have listened to things that were recorded in this exact location.

Yeah, probably. Born 1981.

Did the Funkhaus have any special meaning to you?

Is it like ZDF Lerchenberg, or something that you knew as a child?

Hmm, no, not for me.

I am asking because when I first heard the record that we just partially listened to

from Trettmann's #DIY album, which I believe you produced entirely ...

Yes, the whole thing.

... that, in a weird way, it reminded me of what

Günther Fischer and Manfred Krug used to do in the Amiga studios,

and then recorded it live in locations like this one right here.

In what sense? I can't really make anything of it, but I've been told that a few times.

I don't know the recordings. I've never listened to them.

I don't know what that means. Maybe you can explain what about our music reminds you of that.

Well, people from our generation,

as so often with music that is older than we are,

we got to know it through hip hop.

In this case it was Eins Zwo, who sampled "Baden gehen",

which was on one of Manfred Krug's records.

And for many of us, Manfred Krug was this strange TV lawyer,

or the grumpy trucker,

and then we were like "what do you mean he also sang?".

And of course these records were not available at an affordable price anywhere,

but then, oddly enough,

2-3 would become available in record stores not far away from here.

And there, in the late 60's/early 70's,

they would record jazz with huge big band orchestras,

and this dude from the Telekom commercial would sing just like he was from the Mississippi Delta.

He really had the blues in him, and he expressed it in words that were not at all embarrassing,

but he still spoke about very emotional things.

Got it. His own lyrics or did he translate English things?

No, he wrote in German.

And similar to Brazil at the time, he would wrap criticism about the regime in metaphors,

just like on "Baden gehen", or like "Billie Holiday".

Makes sense. Tretti definitely has blues in him,

and he's very gifted when it comes to writing in German,

making things sound non-cheesy,

and creating images and triggering emotions.

He has a massive talent, he can achieve all that with a great flow and without making it sound corny,

and his voice is just full of blues.

There's no better way to describe it.

The first time you were confronted with his work, that was probably not clear from the start?

Quite the opposite really.

He used to be Ronny Trettmann,

the funny reggae Saxon that would joyfully make fun of German reggae,

and things like "der Sommer, Sommer ist für alle da", that's the kinda stuff he did.

So the complete opposite of that.

But already then, in his previous discography, there would be single songs on his albums

between 14 slapstick tracks that had you going

"okay, wow. There's more to discover here."

For example, on his album "Tanz auf dem Vulkan"

there's a track called "Schwarzer Sonntag",

and on it you can hear his blues and how he tells this story.

So it was always there, but he didn't pursue it then,

or the producers led him in a different direction,

but we chose that particular side of him as an artist

and decided that's the one we want to work with.

You used to also play dancehall when you deejayed,

and he was the guy who, amongst all these summer hits,

had some legit dancehall tracks.

Definitely. Within his genre, he was the boss.

If you're talking about German dancehall and looking at this particular scene only,

he was by far the best and the only one,

and he won all the prizes he could possibly win.

But eventually he reached the limit,

because reggae and dancehall are part of a pretty small scene in Germany.

Small in a way that you guys also got to know each other through this scene?

Exactly.

So Braunschweig …

Formed from the sediments of the German dancehall scene,

that's basically how Kitschkrieg came to be.

But just like coffee grounds, it can be a great fertilizer.

Yeah.

Do you remember the first time you saw each other face to face?

I remember exactly the first time I met Fiji.

It was at "Brain Club" in Braunschweig, pretty legendary place.

If you deejay in Germany, you're going to end up in this club sooner or later,

and he was there and was playing his own productions over self-constructed controllers,

with his project at the time "Symbiz".

I thought that was really insane,

because normally people will deejay on turntables or CD players,

but he stood there with this handcrafted box,

pushing buttons and playing his own songs on it.

To this day, I've never seen anything like it.

So Krefeld didn't have that kind of stuff.

No.

Then he booked us a gig in Krefeld,

one of our first trans-regional bookings.

And how did it go?

There wasn't much going on there.

It was just on the rise.

I remember standing backstage and saying

"okay, nobody really showed up, so I'm going to go to the ATM to withdraw your fee,

because I don't see this happening today anymore."

So that's how we met. And awhodat ...

we spent a lot of time hanging out at dancehall parties in Cologne,

and checked out all German sound systems

like Pow Pow Movement, the Berliners Supersonic, and that whole era.

Concrete Jungle, Barney Miller, all these people.

It was the golden age of dancehall, when it was new in Germany,

people were really excited about it and the parties were full, it was a good time.

Did Gerd Gummersbach still have his location then?

Yes, he did. And if you didn't use the lift on the turntables you would die.

He would literally throw things at you and go

"use the lift!". "Okay, sorry."

We bought all our mixtapes from Gerd Gummersbach.

I know Kris since June 3rd, 2014.

It's always like this. She's our annalist.

How long since Kitschkrieg was founded?

We'll be like "something between 2 and 4 years",

but she'll be able to tell you exactly how many days.

So since when does Kitschkrieg exist?

4th anniversary coming up soon.

Better circle the date in your calendars, or you'll be in trouble.

Which exact day do you even go by? What's our founding date?

There are several dates. But really it's November 1st, 2014.

There you have it. Ok.

And what happened on that day?

I came to Berlin from Cologne with just a shoebox and a suitcase.

And then the three of us lived together in flat share.

Until recently.

We always said when things start going well, we will all get our own place.

And we just did, so things are going great! Yeah!

But aren't you afraid that you'll be missing something now?

That was everyone's reaction!

When Fizzle posted to Facebook that he was looking for a place,

my brother called to ask if everything's okay with us.

But we all still live really close to each other.

We hang out every day. Our studio is there,

and we have this small space that we're fixing up at the moment, but it's nice to go home in the eve

and not to have to see them anymore.

You probably had enough time in your joint flat to figure out who does dishes,

who takes down the trash, etc.

How do you divide it up with whatever it is that you are

- a production team, a label, or multimedia entity?

I don't even know what an entity is.

It definitely sounds very official.

I don't know. We stopped trying to define it.

We make music, we do photography,

create videos and clothes, and everything else we are interested in.

So in the end it's probably just a brand that delivers content of any sort.

We decided we're not going to try to be a band.

You have to ask yourself how you want to take it to the stage,

how much is it going to be about us as individuals.

We try to emphasize our work, our brand name and our logo,

and the people we work with,

rather than forming a band and trying to become the center of attention.

About the logo, are you, as a Krefeld native, responsible for the LA Kings reference?

No, that was him.

Against resistance from Nicole. I mean awhodat, sorry.

I was wondering since when everybody's into the NHL.

It's more of a cultural reference dedicated to gangster rap from LA, like N.W.A.

and the Raiders and Kings and that kind of stuff.

Ok. We just listened to Tretti, and I assume we're all fans here,

but maybe we can give a short insight into what you've been doing since November 1st, 2014.

Our first Kitschkrieg release was an EP with Noah Slee from New Zealand.

How do you find these people?

Soundcloud.

Classic Soundcloud scenario.

You upload your music and then you find a message in your inbox

from somebody saying "Hey, I'm coming to Berlin and I think your music is super interesting,

so let's get together".

So we met him and got to know him, and then we created the first Kitschkrieg release.

That was a rather slow beginning,

it took a full year to finish the EP,

but afterwards we moved on into the phase where we did the EPs with Tretti,

which were called Kitschkrieg EPs.

We made three of those, Kitschkrieg 1, 2, and 3.

And that was Trettmann's new beginning.

Together, Trettmann and Kitschkrieg then made an EP with Megaloh,

the "Herb & Mango" EP. So, Tretti, Kitschkrieg, Megaloh.

Then we did an EP for RAF and Bonez

as part of their "Palmen aus Plastik" box,

a dancehall EP with RAF, Bonez, and Tretti.

Then we worked with Haiyti for her "Toxic" EP,

and through working with her we got to know Joey Bargeld

and released another 3 EPs with him.

So we really like EPs in case you haven't noticed.

It's a nice short format.

And then we sat down and did the Trettmann #DIY album,

and that's basically it to this day.

You forgot the Haiyti album.

True, we also did the Haiyti album "Montenegro Zero".

That's the music we've created in the past 4 years.

We did a few singles for friends too,

but we try to do entire projects,

and not send out beats, trying to get them integrated into other projects.

Can we begin with "Raver", to give people a better impression?

Yes. Raver is off of KitschKrieg 2 from 2016.

How did Tretti's old dancehall friends react to this?

Pretty good. No complaints, they were excited for him.

To be honest, I was worried too. Often when an artist changes so significantly

it ends up being embarrassing and discredits everything they've done up until then.

Luckily that didn't happen here.

People acknowledged that it was real,

and that there was nothing really to hate about it.

We also really focused on what we think about it.

The whole EP phase was also our time of self-discovery.

We didn't call ourselves Kitschkrieg before that.

That was when we said "we're all in this together",

and we decided to name our EPs and ourselves Kitschkrieg for the sake of the team spirit.

We didn't really have anything but team spirit.

We didn't know that we could be making money with this.

Which one of you contributed the rave competence?

Tretti himself.

He's a proper raver.

He's really the only one of us.

None of us rave on the same level as Tretti.

(laughter in the room)

Sounds like there are secret agents amongst us.

Should we listen to another rave song? I have a nice rave track.

You wanna listen to another rave song?

Nice memories.

Now that we're listening to this ... Good thing you're asking.

This was a really interesting phase, during which we learned a lot about ourselves.

For example, we're shamelessly quoting The Streets' "Blinded by the Lights" on this track.

It's kind of a fuzzy line between stealing and quoting,

but we decided to worry less about what's allowed,

and to just do what feels right for the song.

And also, as part of Kitschkrieg's identification phase, it was a time when

just like with Tretti, we had discovered a new artist and noticed a facet.

There was something sad about her, which had sporadically shimmered through before,

but we wanted to emphasize it in full EP lengths.

We began implementing our own ideas into the work we did with these artists.

This song for example, they hadn't slept in ages and were totally out of it.

Fizzle had recorded them and sent me this acapella over some beat.

It was way too loud, with the hi-hats blasting through my headphones.

We remixed it, and it turned out to be the beautiful song that it is today.

It's def got a "Lila Wolken", commercial TV flair to it.

You think?

I think it's got a pretty commercial noughties feel to it.

The steps and the shameless quote are like "Attention! Afterhour".

The rave synths and so on are pretty borderline.

You think, do I really want to go there, but you also just really like it,

and that was when we said it doesn't matter: If we like it, we're doing it.

That takes courage.

It helps when Haiyti and Joey Bargeld come stumbling into the studio still completely tripping.

If you don't know the backstory and you listen to it, you wonder how old are these people?

All the Genglish (German-English-mix)

sounds a bit like some business dude is trying to talk 1994 teenie slang.

May we quote that?

I liked that one too.

It's just real. That's the state they were in.

I don't think any of us asked themselves how it will come across in the end.

It just needed to come out at that very moment and I held a microphone up to their heads while it happened.

I was also surprised by how pop-like the results were, because the moment itself wasn't pop at all.

It was funny, because you did the session with them, and you were super annoyed.

Bargeld is a sketchy dude, on a first impression,

so you catch yourself thinking "I hope he doesn't steal anything".

So yeah, you were pretty annoyed by it all.

But I remember, there was a second song that was created during this session.

and you sent it along just like "oh, and we have this too".

I don't even remember that.

Do you remember?

No, I don't. But I know I was not in Berlin, and Fizzle sent it to me

and I - no wait, that was a different song,

it was "Hero für Fuffi" -

I heard Joey, and I realized right away: We have to work with this guy.

It wasn't that obvious to us.

But that's how we started working in a ping-pong style.

Because I wasn't part of the session,

I wasn't annoyed, and I could judge it differently,

And we do that quite a lot actually,

where we don't all work together at the same time, but rather take turns.

That's quite an interesting approach for anyone working with beats.

Yeah, the interesting thing is: Beats are beats, songs are songs.

And how does A, or B, turn into S?

Via A-B-C

Wow

Algebra 1?

Just teamwork. Eisfeld once said:

"It's a nice beat, but good beats are just good beats. We need great songs", and that really stuck with me.

That's a good example, because even he and his crew had different phases,

and you could always tell that they were better

when they had somebody else to give another opinion.

Somebody that would say "Cool idea, but let's try this differently".

It's not the most comfortable position to be in,

when you're working with these frail, beaming, lighthouse-like artist personalities,

and you think

"okay, you're shining, but you could shine so much more if you did things like this."

But that's the exact moment when you have to be honest,

and usually the artist is very thankful for that,

because if you don't say it, the song will only turn out to be mediocre.

And then one day, he'll step onto the stage and he will only find out then that it's not that great,

and that's so much more brutal than finding out in the studio already.

Just say "I think you can do better.

Honesty in the studio, while recording and during songwriting, is extremely important.

I never once experienced an artist getting upset about it, no matter which artist it was.

We've even completely blown off songs, or entire verses.

Yeah, the worst scenarios, but never once did anyone get mad, on the contrary.

Because with growing success, you are surrounded by a crew that might be living off of and with you.

You don't need yes-sayers. That leads to nothing. It's goes back to what you said earlier.

We're really trying to cultivate that kind of honesty and friction.

It's normal to not always agree, and that's an advantage.

For example, two days ago we played new things to Eisfeld

and he listened to it, and said "Amazing!

The whole setup and how it builds up into the hook line, and then - nothing. Disappointing hook line."

"It's total BS. No it's not even crap. It's just absolutely nothing. That's how bad it is."

And we thought "okay, thanks".

But there are no hurt feelings. It's helpful.

You listen to the song again and try to understand why he said that.

We spent a lot of time working on that hook line and everything else,

and then you get that kind of feedback.

But it helped me be able to listen to the song again differently, and I understood what he meant.

How long did it take you to recover from the first punch in the stomach?

It's about the right attitude for that kind of conversation.

It's not really a punch in the stomach.

I think we just don't have any ego issues anymore. That's completely over and done with.

You have to be able to tell each other when something sucks. "Hey, that's a bad hook or a shitty photo"

We've done that so many times now, it didn't feel like a punch, to answer your question.

It was really just like "Okay, thanks"

I think we talked about artists' egos in our last lecture. How to deal with that.

And I realized as we were speaking, that we often focus on the bigger goals.

Like where we see this going in the long run, what the next small goal is and so on.

So the small disagreements lose their importance in the perspective of those bigger goals.

Little things like one hook being shitty, or Fizzle being right about something or not, don't matter.

It's more important to keep up the good flow.

Do you know roughly when you guys left your egos behind? Maybe the annalist?

I think after the first EP, which took a year.

Because all the EPs that followed happened a lot quicker and easier,

so it must have been sometime around then.

If you take one year for 4 songs,

you have to ask yourself what's going wrong.

That doesn't really help pay the bills.

Right. It didn't make much sense.

That's when we realized that it's a problem.

The ego goes hand in hand with personal taste, and you can't really fight about that.

So we became pragmatic about it and divided up our responsibilities,

so different people had the authority over different decisions.

Whether I look my best in a specific photo is not really the issue, and it's not my decision either.

If we start fighting about that, we're just wasting our time.

Which is what happens usually.

The photo discussion is a typical issue: Try and get 3-4 people to agree on a favorite.

Everybody looks at themselves, so it's much more efficient leaving it up to somebody

who knows a thing or two about photography.

It's an interesting example, because awhodat is often not in our photos,

because she's usually the one taking them.

So she's the best person to judge them, because all I look at is my own crooked nose.

What we really learned is that there's no point in getting caught up in discussions.

That way, things never get done.

You have to be able to look at the last 20% of it from a distance.

Use an objective perspective, because these two often lose themselves in the details.

They get all nerdy. But you need somebody to step in and say

"It's done. It's nice, it touches me". And then it's really done.

A common mistake is to add another layer, and another one, and another one,

without noticing that it's actually already complete. Send it off, next.

What Nicole said is a great example for the benefits of judging from an outside perspective.

When you're not yet blinded by the routine and unbiased.

We are different people and have different talents.

Women feel better. They are often more in tune with their emotions …

What he's trying to say is women cry a lot.

I thought he was trying to make me cry with his accusations.

It wasn't meant like that. What matters is:

Is it a good song? Does it deliver emotion?

Or is it just a great snare and otherwise crafted to death?

Maybe this is a good moment to show what you contribute to Kitschkrieg.

Let's watch the "Jamaika" video.

It's always pretty brutal having to watch your own work in front of other people.

Yes, but also nice. I haven't seen it in a while,

and it was nice to watch. How long has it been?

February 2018. (Fiji: I miss the fruit lady.)

It's nice to be able to travel around the world

and do our thing and then it gets captured so beautifully.

Why work in black and white?

There's a running gag that I'm color blind.

It remains unclear to this day.

So you don't have a boating license, I assume.

I have a drivers license, so I don't think I am colorblind.

I don't know. It was just a natural development.

I always had a thing for b/w, and I bought this camera ...

No, you bought it! On credit. It took us 5 years to pay off.

So we're talking something like a Leica camera.

No.

Because it took 5 years to pay off.

We were just that broke.

Really broke. It just happened naturally.

I always liked it that way.

We also thought that visually it fit in with what we do audibly.

A lot of reduction, a lot of black space, a lot of pauses.

Less is more.

Yeah. The look and feel is very similar to our music.

Especially when you look at Tretti, Haiyti, Joey Bargeld.

They're not going to say something they can't back up.

It's all real. And it's the same with the photos.

It's not about turning someone into something they're not.

The photo can have perfect lighting and detail,

but if you feel nothing, then it's not going to work. At least not for me.

And what's also similar with our photos and our music is the pauses, the reduction.

You have a photo with lots of black, smoke, and then you see Tretti, only this small,

but it still gets to you emotionally.

Or repetitions in the music, stylistic tools, they become reflections in the photos.

A raspy voice is represented by a crack in the floor, with nice lighting.

But you don't only use it online, but also for your live shows.

It's a pretty big part of your live shows actually.

Yeah, as of recently.

Like awhodat said, it really carries a certain feel.

When you look at Trettmann's Splash! show, we had a really nice scenery:

Everything was dark and in the background you had these nice b/w images and moving images.

That, carefully adjusted to a live setting with the appropriate lighting,

which for one short moment turned colorful,

but otherwise remained white the entire time, really playing with the b/w concept of the show.

It all connects and it emphasizes the mood of it all.

It feels like it's always belonged together, and it kind of has, so it makes perfect sense for us.

Tretti himself also performs more mono-chromatic than he did in the past.

Yeah. Exactly. That was a joint decision.

We're doing all of it together. Trettmann is really more like a band,

and we decided to implement that concept together,

and add our own style to it. And Tretti likes it.

He promoted it from the start

and was happy to do something else for a change,

and he was also the one who suggested calling the EPs Kitschkrieg.

So it all came together very naturally, and now it just belongs that way.

There are also moments in which we further develop that imagery.

I remember being on Böhmermann, he had invited Tretti,

and they performed "Grauer Beton" with an orchestra, and they turned it into a TV thing.

They took awhodat's video for "Grauer Beton" and adopted the b/w theme.

It was amazing. Beautiful.

I think we're going to get to that in a second.

Like in any great cooking show, we've prepared something.

But I find this very interesting.

Were you already on board for "Großvater"?

No, not in this constellation.

We were there in a way that we would occasionally produce something for him with our previous projects

or made a remix.

Since the first Trettmann songs, there's always been a remix by us for every song.

Looking back on it, it was a moment where people realized,

"Hang on, there's more to this guy,"

"And he wants to talk about other things too." Do more than songs like "Applaus".

Although that was a very entertaining metaphor ...

Totally

But that video was also b/w.

It was, but that was more of a coincidence. That was his 2nd or 3rd song.

And he would go back and forth between different styles. So that was just a coincidence, not our influence.

You we're just talking about Böhmermann and "Grauer Beton".

4 weeks ago the topic came full circle

when Tretti, who is from Karl Marx Stadt, performed at the concert.

You were so kind to prepare some pieces from that.

Let's watch half of that video, just to get back in.

I call this an all-round success.

Since Spliff's "Glaspalast", which was something like 35 years ago,

I don't think we've had something so contemporary that really gets to people,

is personal, and still done in a way that even a 13 year old can relate.

Thanks.

We also had the feeling it was something special, because it's a part of German history

that doesn't really get talked about much in pop music in such a straightforward way.

There was this Paul van Dyk piece that left you feeling weird,

but this track is, as he says himself, just to let people know where he's from.

Even just the chorus. How many months before the parliamentary elections was this track released?

3 or 4 months or so?

It was released on August 22nd.

Yeah I know that, because we finished it up the night before, on August 21st at 10pm,

and the night before that, a hotel room window fell onto my leg in Hamburg.

True story.

But I called them in Berlin and said "don't worry, I'll still have the video ready in time.

We can upload it at midnight".

Another part of it are the figures of speech,

but also repetitions like the ones young listeners are used to from artists like Yung Fuck and other Atlanta rappers.

But the lines about "Seelenfänger" (soul hunters) are no accusations.

Right, he's just describing what he saw.

He literally saw that. He lived there, and he's just sharing images of what he saw.

and we supported him and told him to go with it.

I personally didn't know the story,

because I come from the west, and it was unfathomable for me,

but with the way he described these images, it became possible for me to envision them too.

And when we drove out there to shoot the video, it all came together nicely.

We were able to understand what it was like back in the day, and also what the vibe is like nowadays.

It all got captured very well.

That song was also a special track on the album,

it underlines our transition from doing EPs to doing albums,

because we worked much more conceptually

and we had these songs ready before we had the music.

I remember you saying "Hey, we have Grauer Beton, it's about this topic,

and now we need music that can carry that message,

and also fits to the rest of the album, but not anything turn up style or too zeitgeisty."

And how does one do that?

With a TR-808 cowbell.

Do you know the TR-808?

It's a drum machine from the 80's.

I just secretly wikipedia-ed it again.

It's a Japanese drum machine from 1980 from the brand Roland,

and Tretti loved the cowbell sound.

It was like an insider gag,

and so it's pretty funny that the cowbell ended up being such a substantial element to the song.

The Zeit magazine falsely called it a Gameboy sound one time.

I would like to set that record straight right now.

I want to add one thing.

You said young people know this stuff from Yung Fuck and so on, and that's exactly what it is in its simplest form.

Of course it went through several stages lyrically,

but it was written to a Mike Will Made It beat. So it's definitely related.

Which one?

I don't know. Some random Mike Will Made It beat.

And that's another example of what writing can be like.

Somebody's digging a beat, and then you write a song to it, and then you have lyrics,

and then you take another look at it without the beat,

and then eventually the music just wraps itself around it, and that's basically how "Grauer Beton" came to be.

Before we get into detail about the rug that was woven around these lyrics:

When do you hold yourselves back?

There are some very personal songs on this album,

about break ups and one about suicide,

and sometimes it seems that with the lyrics being so detailed, some parts are unusually sloppy for him.

You get the feeling that it's so close and personal already,

that you don't want to push him over the edge by trying to dig even deeper,

and working on it even longer, because everything could fall apart then.

That's exactly it.

The suicide scenario is also based on a true experience he made,

and turning it into a song was already a tough decision to make.

Working on the track was difficult, the days after were difficult.

Everything about it felt as heavy, as the song itself.

And then it's not about singing it again and trying to get it perfectly.

It's allowed to be a bit sloppy, as long as the emotions are real, and they are.

So it's about understanding that there are more important things than recording take after take.

It was like fate, because it happened towards the end of the album production,

and we didn't make any more songs than the ones that ended up on the album,

so we had 9 songs and the 10th one was missing, and then that happened.

Tretti was completely out of it, and we thought

"oh God, how are we going to finish up this album? And how is he going to deal with this?"

Writing a song about it almost seemed like our only option.

It was tough.

We all sat in our kitchen with a lump in our throat.

The thing is, even when you play it to adults,

Like "here, this is what your kids listen to", especially compared to RAF camora,

they notice - and you we were just talking about blues -

that the really meaningful parts are not thoroughly designed and perfected,

and that's exactly what helps make it so authentic and honest.

That's exactly the trick.

You keep the mistakes and don't try to make it Hollywood style,

and record 5 voices and turn them into one, until it's so smooth and perfect,

that you can't differentiate one voice from another anymore.

We don't have much doubling, barely any ad libs,

one well recorded track, conveying all the emotions, has to be enough.

It was back in the day.

When you listen to old records, that can be enough.

When somebody has an important message, the song is simply good, and the feeling is real.

Most of the time when you try to make more of it,

it's really you trying to hide the fact that it wasn't enough to begin with.

You have to be honest with yourself and understand that you can't sugarcoat it,

because that doesn't make it any better.

Reverb is not the answer to all our questions.

No.

Something you probably learned from dub and dancehall

is the courage to add pauses, in your videos often shown as black slides.

You often include breaks in pace, and you allow echoes to unfold.

Why don't you show us the different components of the song?

We'll start with the cowbell:

This is the infamous 808 cowbell.

Initially I listened to it and discovered that it's really a dyad.

I'm not super familiar with music theory,

but it's a quint, meaning there are 5 halftones between it.

So I did this with it, to emphasize that.

It's a sound that consists of two notes.

Then I added the sound to a sampler and pitched it down.

One octave lower, and another octave lower.

And that's what stayed until the end,

because I love the transition between the original sound

and how it then develops into the foundation of what becomes the beat.

The great thing about an 808 is that, for the past 37 years,

it's had a great meaning to basically every music genre, but it's a super rare machine.

People think everything's been done with it already.

The great thing is the sounds are so modifiable.

You can do so much by changing pitch and duration,

and therefore super versatile in their applicability,

but they also remain recognizable throughout, just like the cowbell.

They're charged with associations,

like the 80's and Gameboy sounds,

which gives modern beats a retro touch,

because something is only retro, if it reminds you of something.

When the machine first entered the market it was a total flop,

and then it was re-discovered by some broke people,

because they could buy it for a few bucks in second hand shops.

Exactly. And nowadays nobody has the machine, but everybody has the sample set.

Right. Back in the day if you wanted to tune this machine, you'd have to completely take it apart,

solder the parts and build in a putty, remove cables.

I'm going to assume that 90% of the people, not just the ones in Atlanta,

that have worked with these sounds,

have never actually seen one of these machines.

I saw one once, but I never owned one. And then I -

Before we get there.

You're playing everything from your computer.

It doesn't look like you are a total tech equipment crack.

This is the studio.

And this is the second studio.

And then we have one more for photos and videos, and that's our setup. That's really all you need nowadays.

Very duster friendly.

If you're being honest with yourself, consider how much these machines can do.

If you have ideas, this is all you need.

Here for example, logic is running,

and here's a a mini jack,

and that's how we produced the Tretti album, even without a sound card.

None of these 96 kilohertz …

Vocals is a bit of a different story, but that's really the only thing that requires proper equipment,

like a good mic, a good compressor and good studio monitors for listening purposes,

and that's the entire setup.

Our studio is very minimalistic, there's not a lot of stuff standing around.

And we did everything with this laptop, even the final mixing.

And then I layered the cowbells with the keyboard.

And it becomes a melody, because there's two notes coming together.

You almost already have a chord sequence,

so all you need to do is add a third note,

and then you automatically have a bunch of minor chords.

I was really happy with how it turned out, because the cowbell chords basically ended up dictating the rest,

and it kind of just unfolded on its own.

Next we had to decide on a snare.

We chose the same cowbell, adding reverb this time.

And then ...

there's basically just another bass layer, also done with the 808,

and a piano on top of it, and that's it.

We decided not to add any hi-hats or a louder snare,

because we wanted everything on the frequency of his voice to remain free,

to achieve maximum emphasis on him.

You just said "charged".

How much, especially with a German topic like this,

how much do you worry about slipping into a sentimentality, that makes it difficult?

Or is that not an issue for you?

I think they were independent factors.

He wanted the cowbells,

because every beat involving cowbells is a good beat in Tretti's opinion,

so we took a closer look at that.

I remember coming into the studio and he showed it to me in a similar way as just now,

showing the individual steps, and taking it apart again,

and it wasn't in connection to a specific topic or a song.

The music was completely detached from what it turned into later.

Then how did the two parts come together and mold so perfectly?

That is the earlier described allocation of different responsibilities.

This is how you can imagine it:

We have this pool, which is our Dropbox, and it has a text document in it with the lyrics to "Grauer Beton",

so we all know there's a song, there might even be a demo of it somewhere,

or Tretti might have sung it to you on the phone before.

And then it happens - not always, but sometimes - that everything comes together neatly.

That was the moment in the studio, when I was presented the beat

and Tretti had just sung it to me two days earlier, and I thought "okay, I think we have lyrics for that".

I also think that just the piano makes it a very cheesy ballad, very over the top,

and producing is always about micro decisions,

what do we need more of, what do we need less of.

Finding that balance between 808, which is street and hip hop,

and putting it together with the piano in a way that you get away with it, that's the trick.

Are you fighting a war against kitsch, or are you using kitsch as a tool to fight?

We're against it. It's our enemy.

There's no clear line you can follow though.

Once you find your own style and learn to trust it, it becomes easy.

You really only have to listen to your inner voice and base your decisions on that.

It's a very easy thing, you just have to have confidence and trust yourself.

Dancehall is also a good basis for that, because here you also have the great big feelings.

Sure, but I don't know if that's just the case with dancehall.

If you listen to soul or any of the various sub-genres,

there's always going to be songs that are just too much

and then there's one that strikes a chord with you. I think that applies to all genres.

And everyone has to define those limits for themselves, because it's different for everyone.

Luckily, we all have a similar threshold for when thing's become too embarrassing,

and that's a major advantage for us.

Remember when we recorded the vocals?

That was also special, because his voice was so rugged,

which contributed to the realness of it all and makes it so much less cheesy,

but originally he was against us using that recording.

I think "Grauer Beton" is a really great example for,

I don't want to say magic,

but sometimes there are things in the process of a production that you can label,

one guy is working the cowbells like a pro and everybody just plays their part.

But if you pick it apart, you see there were the lyrics for one,

Fizzle created some images that were fitting, Kris made the beat.

I read the lyrics first, and only heard the beat when the first demo was ready.

For me, because it's also my story in a way, I kept asking myself

"How do we solve this? What kind of a beat is this? How does it all go together?"

And it fits perfectly.

It just became clear that we're going to add his broken voice,

even though it's not perfect, and Tretti would have preferred recording new vocals.

And then we were faced with the challenge of having to create a video for that.

About a topic that's ughh, but everything came together really perfectly in the end.

The recording is also the first demo.

He had just returned from touring and was totally hoarse. I'll play it for you quickly.

This is a great example for vocals that aren't perfect, but full of emotions.

And it makes you realize how invaluable it is when an artist trusts you,

because you can convince them that this is exactly how it needs to be for this track,

and talk them out of trying to do it again "properly" after a good night's rest,

because I'm convinced that would have ruined it.

That brings us back to the metaphor from earlier,

where you may not like the way you look in a photograph,

but we on the outside can see that it's still the better shot from an unbiased point of view.

And Tretti trusts us, and goes along with it all, just like it happened with the video:

I had a vision of it. I planned it.

And I tried to convey what we had planned for that day,

and only once the video was done Fizzle said

"Ahhh, now I get it!"

Both these guys and Tretti trusted me completely.

They just told me to do my thing, and that was that.

It's important for teams to let the other people do their own thing, because often you only understand their vision when it's done.

You have your own understanding of their idea,

and what you imagine may be shit,

but then it goes down a whole other alley and in the end you like it after all.

That's why you just gotta let people do their own thing sometimes.

I think you just summed up Kitschkrieg perfectly: Do your thing. Done.

Does that mean a decision like changing the lyrics, or switching octaves was there all along?

That's usually part of the recording process.

We make those micro decisions while we record and say

"Go higher a bit, do less of that".

During the entire time we recorded this album, there isn't one single recording that took several attempts to complete.

We worked on one song at a time, made all the decisions right then and there,

and then it would stay that way. Pretty intense.

If anything, we brainstormed first what kind of songs might still be missing on the album,

that's what I meant earlier about transitioning from EPs, which were about the moment and our crew,

to albums, saying

"We want 10 songs, what's still missing on the spectrum in terms of music and also lyrics?"

When you use a take that's not perfect, but perfectly captures a moment,

and you want to work it into a live set, performing it 30 nights in a row,

and audiences have high expectations,

how do you go about that? What needs to be adapted or presented differently live?

The songs are quite simple and without any crazy stunts or vocals edits.

We got one great standalone track, carrying all the emotions,

therefore I think it's quite easy for someone like Tretti to perform them live too,

because there are no artificial heights.

It's all on his spectrum and our music leaves enough room for his voice to unfold,

all of that makes it easy for him to sing to.

Were you also in Chemnitz the other week?

No, we were not in Germany.

We kept track of the events on the internet

and of course also had a personal exchange about him going there and what he'll be doing there.

It's a very important issue for him,

because this is his home town, and it's a topic that's accompanied him his whole life already.

We weren't there, but we watched it online.

Oddly enough, the online stream of his performance doesn't show this one song,

it begins right after his performance of "Grauer Beton".

Oh, great.

Yeah, really well done.

Before we get to questions from the audience,

let's talk about 1-2 other artists you've worked with.

Mr. Bargeld for example would turn 16 bars from Tretti into an entire album as far as lyrics go, huh?

Totally.

You could argue that's complete bullshit,

or you can accept the fact that it can deliver just as much emotion

as someone rapping 3 x 16 bars plus a hook and a bridge.

We believe Bargeld's music is enough.

I don't feel like there's anything missing in terms of lyrics or feeling. It's all there.

Should I show you a Bargeld track with really many lyrics?

And a lot of feeling. Bargeld feeling.

That's more of a Kanye West approach.

Yeah, maybe.

You have to be ballsy to do that, but once you get into it, you don't feel like anything's missing.

I'm happy with the outcome.

We definitely had this discussion internally.

Yeah, what the hell.

One day at the studio and this is what you got?

You get sent this vocal track ... Although this is one of the more productive outpourings by Mr. Bargeld.

Yeah, we have a song "Party Leben." "Party, Party, Party, Leben." Two words.

And I even had to loop those.

And then the reply to that is

"But listen to how intense this one word …"

And in the end you ask yourself, is this art or can it be tossed?

There is a level on which you can sit down with an artist for hours,

just to maybe end up with 3 words or one sentence or one hook.

You need a lot of patience for that, and I don't have that.

A track like "Party Leben" stems from an 8-9 hour long recording day.

We have tons of vocals, it's not like that's all we ended up with,

but for some reason that ended up being the thing we thought we should work with.

It's about reduction.

I always go on about how it's the same for beats and photos, but it really is.

Digitally, we have access to any sound in the world,

we could add woodwinds or anything we want,

but we're limited by what Kitschkrieg defines itself as.

What is the band, what's the orchestra, what vocabulary do we want to use?

And then it always ends up being the same 5 sounds, or always the same 16:9 b/w look.

More cowbell ...

What do 9 hours of working with Megaloh look like, versus 9 hours with Mr. Bargeld?

That's the complete opposite to Joey Bargeld.

He has every syllable rhyming with the next one, so even we lose track of it.

The raps and rhymes are fragmented into such tiny details, that it becomes a whole other discipline.

And then the 16 bars need to be built around it accordingly.

The funny thing is, that Megaloh and Joey Bargeld get along really well,

because they totally get that they are so far apart musically.

And then you have someone like Megaloh asking Bargeld how he writes his lyrics,

it's really very funny to watch him explain that.

"Uh, dunno, I just have these 3 uhhh … and yeah, that's it!" "Okay cool, thanks!"

Does that mean he just shuts down after half a beat or what?

Bargeld? No.

He just has a talent to distill it so much, that whatever he ends up with, is still enough to make it work.

For example, in the studio, when we turn on some music and tell him to write something to that,

he actually does. And then when he's done, he has to laugh about it himself.

And then he presents us one single sentence.

And like I said, I think that's a crazy talent, to reduce it to such little material, and still get away with it.

It might be the hardest thing to do really.

So he's the Johnny Lydon of German rap.

Probably, yes.

Okay, so you got punk. What's Megaloh - a sprinter? A decathlete?

He's just THE rapper.

If you do rap in that genre, you have to do it like he does.

He's a true MC in a classical sense.

You don't have to compare it, those are just two different sports.

And it can happen to be similar music, but they remain two different sports.

For the project "Herb & Mango" with him and Trettmann, we had to find a musical platform that makes all that audible.

We were able to level their two voices up against each other,

and I remember cutting the verses from 16 bars to 12,

so it became less about length and doing it just for the purpose of sporting,

and more about the awesomeness of the song.

Hang on, you cut 1/4 of a writer's content and took it away from them?

Sure, that's exactly our job.

It may sound funny, but that's what it comes down to.

You can't just press record and take what you get.

Your job is to cut things out, to tell them to do things differently, that's what producing is all about.

It's our job.

That sounds like we should give this a quick listen.

You guys can already think about your questions and we'll send someone around with a mic.

But first, we're going to listen to?

"Anorak" by Megaloh, Trettmann and us.

Alright, let's get down to business now:

How important is it for an artist's survival, also in times of Spotify and so on,

that your pieces are also suitable for gym playlists?

Gym playlists … okay

Sure, you could think it's important,

because we only earn money from streaming and things like that,

at least in our case, because we don't go on tour, we don't perform live,

so it's about how much music we sell or stream.

You could focus on being placed in these playlists.

And in order to do that it's probably easiest to just stick to the sound people are used to.

All 20 of those songs pretty much sound the same.

Same pattern, same construct.

That doesn't mean it's a bad thing, but it's all the same type of music.

You can play along,

or what worked in our case, was to produce the complete opposite of that and attract attention that way.

That also gets you into playlists.

And if you make music that reaches people emotionally, they add it to their own playlists too.

You don't want to just get into the editorial playlists.

If your listeners send it to all their friends and they add it to their playlists too.

then that also gets you plays and the money you need to get by.

That sounded like you have a secret agenda.

It's been a while since we last heard something new from you guys.

Suspicious.

Suspicious indeed.

Would you like to name a date?

Somebody else is responsible for dates.

Yeah …

Silence.

So maybe there are secrets to be uncovered soon.

Does somebody have the mic and a question?

A hand signal. Great.

Hi

First of all I wanted to say, 808 ftw, keep it up.

Then I wanted to ask all 3 of you:

I don't know how you see this, but we as people want to be liked and loved.

There are 2 groups of people for whom that's not very productive.

The first one being villains in wrestling,

and the second group being artists that play the role of outsiders.

And now you guys are rightfully receiving lots of love for your art

and from lots of people sitting here, myself included.

How does becoming less of an outsider, and gaining appreciation for what you do, have an influence on you?

That's a good point.

There's that phenomenon where you lose all drive as soon as your struggle ends, and things become boring.

But I don't think we're very susceptible to that, because this is what we've always done.

There's no other way.

We did it for 10 - 15 years without any success,

struggling to be able to pay our rent, over such a long amount of time,

and that shows that we were never able to do it any other way.

And now we're in a phase where everything becomes possible,

and we can work with all our heroes, and we're enjoying it, but also staying true to ourselves.

Our taste hasn't changed.

And I think we're pretty unsusceptible to that, because we were already of a certain age

when our success kicked in.

Maybe had this happened at 20 or 25, it might have been different.

But now we're just thankful to be able to go into the studio and work with people that we're fans of.

And being able to make music with them, so I think we're pretty safe.

A symptom of that and something that should calm you down is

that when we receive awards for what we do, we usually feel really awkward about it,

we just want to get back to the studio and be amongst ourselves again.

We're really doing it for the love of it all, it's fun creating music, and photos and videos.

That's why we do it.

Are there any other artists you'd like to work with.

Be it a German rapper or international artists,

and do you approach them, or do you wait to be approached by them?

We typically approach these people directly.

Of course we also have people approaching us, and we check them out to see if we want to work with them or not,

but we're definitely working our way down our wishlist at the moment, every chance we get.

That's true. Here's a secret:

We were joking about how our to-do-list is the same as our wishlist.

Any other questions?

I saw something in the back ...

Does everything have to involve all Kitschkrieg members,

or does she also go off and shoot videos for projects you guys are not interested in?

It has to be all of Kitschkrieg.

We tried it differently once, and it didn't make us happy.

I can take your picture without their approval.

I guess now the time has come for us to applaud and thank these people,

and let them know that we're excited for what is to come.

We started off with "Billie Holiday", so maybe we can end this session with that video.

Thank you, Kitschkrieg.

For more infomation >> KitschKrieg Lecture (Berlin 2018) | Red Bull Music Academy - Duration: 1:20:58.

-------------------------------------------

What is Electric Charge? (Electrodynamics) - Duration: 6:50.

This episode was made possible by generous supporters on Patreon.

Hey Crazies.

There's a question I get every once in a while that I think we're ready to answer:

What the heck is electric charge?

Let's just jump into it.

I don't even think we'll need quantum mechanics for this.

Just like objects can have mass or temperature or speed,

objects can also have charge.

It's just a property.

Things like balloons, hair, or pieces of plastic become charged by transferring electrons.

Super zoom!

Inside atoms, protons and neutrons are the heavier particles in the center.

Electrons are the lighter looser particles on the outside.

So they're what can be gained or lost when things rub against each other.

If we rub a balloon against someone's hair,

the balloon and the hair become attracted to each other.

Now that they're charged, they don't even need to touch to affect each other.

This is just like how masses attract in Newtonian gravity.

We even said in the previous video there were a lot of similarities,

so this shouldn't be a surprise if you're already subscribed.

Subscribe.

Unlike mass though, charge has two different types or flavors.

We call these two types: positive and negative,

but only for mathematical convenience.

They're just labels.

We could have just as easily called them: Up and Down

or Good and Evil, or Dingleberry and Snozberry.

The snozberries taste like snozberries.

The two types show opposite behaviors, so as long as the labels are opposites,

we're fine.

It doesn't even matter which one we label which.

The labels we use today were decided 270 years ago in 1748 by Ben Franklin.

It might have been better to label them the other way,

but now we're stuck with it.

Thanks Ben Franklin.

Hop on my filthy back!

Anyway, where was I?

Oh, oh right! Opposite behaviors!

Opposite charges attract and like charges repel,

which I think is pretty common knowledge at this point.

That's what makes atoms the way they are.

The protons are positive and the electrons are negative,

so they're attracted to each other.

Unfortunately, since the electrons are the things that move around and electrons are negative,

we kind of have to think backwards.

An electron gain makes an object negative and an electron loss makes an object positive.

The balloon from earlier gained electrons from the hair,

so it became negative and the hair became positive.

But that doesn't really explain what charge is.

As Cameron McHenry pointed out, sure objects become charged because their parts are charged.

But electrons are elementary particles.

They don't have parts and neither do any of these other charged particles.

So what the heck is charge?!

To answer that, we need to talk about the EM field.

Charge and the electromagnetic field are inextricably connected.

You can't really understand one without understanding the other.

What's a field again?

Yeah, OK, that's a fair question.

A field is a value or set of values assigned to every point in space.

But jumping right into the EM field can be a bit overwhelming.

Let's start with gravity.

It's a little easier to imagine and a lot easier to work with.

So, here's the Earth. Just chilling.

Around the Earth is a bunch of points in space and every single one of those points

has a vector arrow attached to it.

Since the Earth is pretty massive, it has a lot of control over those arrows.

The whole collection of arrows is called a gravitational field and it's always there.

Even if there isn't any mass around, the field is still there.

It's just zero.

It helps to think of mass as a property of objects and fields as a property of space.

The Earth and the space it occupies are real tangible things.

The mass and the field are just properties we measure

to help us explain what the tangible things are doing.

And a really convenient way to understand that connection is with Gauss's law.

In general, it's written like this.

Here's the field, a property of space,

and here's whatever property is affecting that field.

For gravity, it relates the gravitational field to mass.

It says the gravitation field across some closed area, also known as flux,

is proportional to the mass inside that closed area.

Ugh, can you do that with a picture please?

Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, sure thing.

Let's imagine that closed area is the surface of a sphere.

If that sphere doesn't enclose any mass, then there's no flux across its surface.

There is just as much field pointed in as there is pointed out.

If that sphere does enclose mass, then there's an overall inward flux.

There's more field pointed inward than outward, which is true no matter how big the sphere is

Even if you don't know where the mass is, the field's behavior tells you where the mass is

and how much there is.

It's actually a really useful connection.

Because electricity is so similar, we can do the same thing with the EM field and charge,

but the EM field is just a smidge more complicated.

We could look at it all together as an electromagnetic tensor,

one big set of numbers attached to each point in space.

But it's easier to think about it as two separate vectors instead,

one for the electric part and one for the magnetic part.

Vector fields are so much easier than tensor fields.

Trust me. You don't want to use the tensors unless you have to.

So we'll imagine each point in space has two vector arrows attached.

As a charge moves around inside the space, you can see how each of those vectors changes.

If the charge isn't moving, then all the magnetic arrows drop to zero,

leaving only the electric arrows.

We'll focus on that electric part now and save that magnetic part for a later video.

Back to Gauss's law!

For electric fields, it looks like this.

It relates the electric field to charge.

And just like with gravity, you can use a carefully chosen closed area

to figure out where the charge is and how much of it there is.

Just like mass tell us how much an object or particle will affect the gravitational field,

charge tells us how much an object or particle will affect the electromagnetic field.

It's coupling property.

It couples objects and particles to space.

So what's electric charge?

Electric charge is just a property of objects or particles

that inextricably connects them to the EM field and, therefore, to space.

There are two opposite types that display opposite behaviors.

It's conserved across time and everyone agrees on how much there is.

It's a really big deal!

So, was this deep enough for you or are you still craving the quantum mechanics?

Let us know in the comments.

Thanks for liking and sharing this video.

Don't forget to subscribe if you'd like to keep up with us.

And until next time, remember, it's OK to be a little crazy.

The featured comment comes from Zoltán Kürti who mentioned:

Gauss didn't use vector fields. He used quaternions.

Yes, I know, vectors weren't all that universal until Oliver Heaviside came along,

but quaternions are really confusing.

If you're interested though, 3blue1brown did a good video on them recently.

Link in the doobly-doo.

Anyway, thanks for watching!

For more infomation >> What is Electric Charge? (Electrodynamics) - Duration: 6:50.

-------------------------------------------

Have you drunk a non-alcoholic poire? - Duration: 1:28.

pears (any grade) / water / sugar (optional)

slice pears, remove the core

mince pear slices

separate the pulp using a sieve

cook on low heat for 20 minutes, removing the foam

Juice is ready! Cool, serve or preserve it for winter

For more infomation >> Have you drunk a non-alcoholic poire? - Duration: 1:28.

-------------------------------------------

ভারতে মুসলিমদের ইসলাম শিক্ষা কেন হারাম ছিল || শায়খ মতিউর রহমান মাদানী || Bangla Waz New Short Video - Duration: 5:34.

For more infomation >> ভারতে মুসলিমদের ইসলাম শিক্ষা কেন হারাম ছিল || শায়খ মতিউর রহমান মাদানী || Bangla Waz New Short Video - Duration: 5:34.

-------------------------------------------

Limiting Reactant, Excess Reactant, Theoretical Yield, Actual Yield, Percent Yield and Percent Error - Duration: 11:03.

Robin Reaction dot com. in this video I'm

going to go over how to find limiting

and excess reagents theoretical actual

and percent yields and percent error

this is kind of a big stoichiometric a

little bit of everything practice

problem and I have lots of other videos

that go over each of these concepts

individually so if you're confused or it

feels like I'm going over it too fast

check out those first but otherwise

let's get into this one so going ahead

and reading our question we have 18

point 1 grams methane and 46.4 grams

oxygen and that reacts to form 19 point

eight grams of carbon dioxide find the

limiting and excess reagent the

theoretical actual and percent yield and

the percent error so our instructions in

blue go ahead and tell us what order to

do these things and I can't emphasize

enough number one make sure your

equation is balanced I've seen so many

students do everything correct and get

the wrong answer and they wonder why and

it's because they skipped this very

first step

never assume your equations are balanced

so let's go ahead looking at this the

first thing I see is that I want to

increase my number of hydrogen's on the

right hand side I'm going to go ahead

and do this now I see that my number of

carbons are equal I have one my number

of hydrogen's are equal I have 4 on both

sides but my number of oxygens are not

equal I have two on the left side and

four on the right side so I'm going to

have to add this and now I'm completely

balanced and just reminder if you don't

write anything in it means there's

actually a 1 here all right so two we

need to convert from grams to moles so

usually in these problems you're given

your initial numbers and grams and

you're asked to find your answers and

grams but you can't solve these problems

without first converting to moles doing

your math there and then converting back

to grams so first just lining up how

much we have

and now going ahead and getting our

molar mass for both of these molecules

and now to convert to grams we just go

ahead and divide

all right so these are our number of

moles that we have of methane and oxygen

and now just to check our definition of

both limiting and excess reagent

the limiting reactant or reagent doesn't

matter is the reactant that limits how

much product you can make all of this is

used up in a reaction and the excess

reagent or reactant doesn't matter is

the reactant that's in excess it's not

used all the way up in a reaction

because it's not the limiting reagent so

the way that I like to do these problems

is I like to pick each reagent and say

okay how much of the other reagent would

I need to completely use up what I have

so let's just go ahead and pick methane

first and we can see that our mole ratio

between methane and oxygen is one to two

so if I have one mole of methane I'm

going to need two moles of o2 but I

don't have one mole of methane I have

one point one two eight moles so doing a

little bit of math

I can figure out that I would need to

point two five seven moles of o2 to

completely use up all of my methane so I

take a little look at how much o2 I

actually have and it's not enough right

I only have one point four five so we

already have one situation that's not

possible now let's do it in the reverse

direction looking at o2 and thinking to

ourselves okay how much methane would I

need to completely use up all my o2 so

again the ratio is one to two or in this

case we can think of it as two to one so

if I had two moles of oxygen I would

need one mole of methane but I don't

have two moles of oxygen I have one

point four five moles of oxygen so let's

divide by two

and so I would get

that I would need point seven to five

moles of ch4 or methane to completely

use up my one point four or five moles

of oxygens so if now I compare how much

I actually have one point one to eight

with the zero point seven to five this

is possible

so now let's relate that to limiting and

excess reagent so limiting reagent is

the one that gets completely used up and

we just did these two calculations to

prove to ourselves that oh two is the

one we can use up so oh two is a

limiting reagent and we can tell from

our math right here with the point seven

two five versus the one point one two

eight that we're going to have a

leftover ch4 we're not going to use that

all up and that means that ch4 is the

excess reagent alright so going through

our problem we now have the limiting and

we have the excess reagent now let's get

the theoretical actual and percent yield

so one of them we have right now and

that's the one that always just has to

be told to you that is the actual yield

so it just says in the problem hey we

made nineteen point eight grams carbon

dioxide that's just the actual yield so

there is no way you could have just

figured out the actual yield because

remember this isn't supposed to just be

a random practice problem this is

supposed to be mimicking what would

happen if you were really in the lab

doing this thing so if you think about

baking a cake you're never going to make

a hundred percent of the cake that you

could have right so let's just think

about all the steps first you put all

your ingredients in so as you're putting

your ingredients in maybe a little bit

of flour or sugar gets on your hands

maybe you crack an egg and a little bit

of the egg drips out of the bowl on the

wrong side maybe as you're stirring some

of the ingredients just kind of come out

of the bowl and land up and land on your

countertop that's just part of cooking

right you're never going to cook an

entire cake and have none of that happen

and even if you're completely careful

with that and you are as diligent as you

can you still can't get all the batter

out of the bowl into the pan right you

can't ever get a hundred percent so each

little step you do you're losing a tiny

little amount and lab is just the same

as that right we aren't magical

scientist we're still limited in what we

can do you're still going to leave your

product on the edge of glass where

you're still going to spill a little bit

you're gonna leave it at the scale

you're just never gonna get a hundred

percent so these problems are trying to

teach you to kind of think about that

and say hey we have to actually

acknowledge that sometimes we just have

an actual yield that's not our

theoretical yield and so there's no math

here we just know it it's 19.8 so we've

got that now let's get the theoretical

yield so looking again at the

definitions of these guys actual yield

how much you've actually made you have

to be told this number in real life in

the lab you always lose some of your

products you never achieve your

theoretical yield and theoretical yield

how much you would make if conditions

were perfect and this is usually your

first instinct for finding yield it's

usually what students think of as what

yield is it's like oh how much could you

make that's your yield so let's go ahead

and do that so we use our limiting

reagent and because we were given the

actual yield for carbon dioxide let's

just go ahead and calculate the

theoretical yield for carbon dioxide why

do you extra work for ourselves so the

ratio between the limiting reagent and

carbon dioxide is two to one

so now let's look at our actual number

of moles we actually have one point four

or five moles so once again dividing by

two we would get 0.72 five moles of

carbon dioxide in a perfect world

and since we're getting into the part of

the problem that has sigfigs

let's just go ahead and check that so

our sig figs are only going to come from

the things that were given to us in the

problem so that means we have one two

three one two three one two three

that's it so we've limitation of three

sig figs so our theoretical yield is 0.7

to 5 moles of carbon dioxide but your

teacher usually doesn't want you to give

it in moles usually they want you to

give it in grams so let's go ahead and

get the molar mass

forty-four 0.01 grams per mole

go ahead and multiply cancel out moles

using in three sigfigs we end up with 30

1.9 grams carbon dioxide so in a perfect

perfect perfect world we could possibly

make 31.9 grams of carbon dioxide and

now we have our theoretical yield so for

a percent yield and percent error these

are just math equations that we can look

up the definition tale so first our

percent yield is just going to be our

actual yield divided by our theoretical

yield times 100 so plugging in for that

remembering that our actual yield just

comes from our problem

using three sigfigs still we just get

that our percent yield is 62.1%

so not great not the worst in the world

and now let's go ahead and calculate our

percent error so these are absolute

value bars so we need to take our

theoretical yield subtract the actual

yield and then divide by the theoretical

yield and multiply all of that by a

hundred

and we calculate that our percent error

is 37.9 so we didn't have the best

results but again it's better to be

honest and know what our results

actually are than to just say oh it was

98% yield all right hope this problem

helped you figure out stoichiometry how

to find limiting excess reactants and

theoretical actual percent yield in

percent error by hey I hope you liked

that video please feel free to like

comment or subscribe and if you go to my

website I have a ton of free practice

problems you can check out if you need

even more help you can hire me for

one-on-one private tutoring sessions

that are online

alright thanks that's it happy studying

For more infomation >> Limiting Reactant, Excess Reactant, Theoretical Yield, Actual Yield, Percent Yield and Percent Error - Duration: 11:03.

-------------------------------------------

Learn Colors with Pig Family and Colorful Sunglasses for Kids - Duration: 3:58.

Hi! Let's learn colors with Pig Family and Colorful Sunglasses for Children!

For more infomation >> Learn Colors with Pig Family and Colorful Sunglasses for Kids - Duration: 3:58.

-------------------------------------------

Let Love Fuel Your Life Purpose - Duration: 7:56.

this little light of mine I'm gonna let it shine let it shine let it shine let it shine

you know, in my almost thirty years here on this planet this is the

first year where I'm actually understanding the true power of love and

I'm not talking about the kind of love that is between one person and another

person but a true all-around all-encompassing universal love a one

miss love this was me almost six or seven years ago when I joined the Navy

just before that time though I had started up my own business I can

remember the time where just before I had joined the Navy I had started that

business and I can't remember working a job that I was not happy with at all I

was at a gym I had no clients the gym was a very dead

space the owners were kind of rude and mean kind of and you know for me I spent

so much time building my website this is before and there was like Wix was like

common or popular like I learned how to really get into WordPress and do the

plugins and do all that stuff and try to make it all come together and I remember

that this was the first company that I had ever started this was the very first

time in my life where I called the shots where I said this is who I am this is

how I'm doing things this is how I'm creating value that time - oh it was

such a special time for me because it taught me the value and the importance

of being dedicated to something that you love when you wake up in the morning

and you feel that excitement like I'm talking about you can't even sleep at

night that's how excited you are when you have that feeling of pure bliss and

pure joy that's how you know you're fueled by something that you you can do

constantly the one thing that I did realize though is especially looking

back on it now since I'm almost 30 is my intention was way off right so this was

my very first group home promotion that I did for my fitness boot camp rugged

strength and that's my old number and these are all the client testimonials

that I had over that time wow this is so amazing and this was this was six years

ago six years ago and this was the little story that they wrote about me so

the reason why I'm showing you this is because of love it's because I know what

it's like to struggle I know what it's like to want to start your own business

fail over and over and over again have a little bit of success that fail go right

back down that mountain and it almost feels like you you have to climb up this

really high mountain and that all the work that you do has to be has to be

hard work it has to be hours and hours and hours and hours and that's only true

if you believe that story I remember that time I remember that time when I

received my first check my first check from Groupon and I think it was like for

like $8,000 or something which is at that time was the most amount of money

that I had ever seen in my life like I couldn't even comprehend seeing $8,000

in a check written to me and for months I was just working so hard trying to

make this work and I didn't realize this until now but I wasn't aligned

completely to my purpose part of my part of my intention

was not to be of service was not to necessarily give the highest value part

of my intention for running my own company or having my own business was to

have my own financial freedom and it wasn't until I started doing what I do

currently where I realized no it's the other way around it's gotta be that you

create and you do things that you love not necessarily an exchange for money

but in exchange for the gratitude and the feeling of that empowerment that

we're seeking I think we all want to have our own freedom in our own way we

all want to be our own bosses we all want to be the hero of our own story and

the only way that you can do that is if your intentions are set on love a few

months later of running the bootcamp business in my head I got very tired of

doing what I was doing and I quit and it just goes to show you that if you are

fueled by something that makes you happy makes you feel joy you're gonna always

keep doing it if you are not enjoying what you do if you don't love what you

do then you're going to ultimately just quit at it right anyway my whole point

to today's vlog is to let love fuel your life purpose is to do what you love is

to wake up every single morning and if you're not happy with what you're doing

in your life it's time to make a change you shouldn't be working for somebody if

you don't truly enjoy it if you are seeking more income if you're seeking

more freedom the online world is your place to be it learn start studying

start growing start start looking up entrepreneurship start watching more

videos on what people are doing and copy them I want to leave you with this entry

that I wrote in my journal on quitting we've been conditioned to believe that

those who quit should be less admired let's listen to less respected this has

been a strong belief system drilled into our Subhan

and dominated by a belief that those who work hard and endured are the heroes

those that stay around long enough receive the glory praise and riches

while those who quit are seen as weak and less than indeed this was a pretty

picture portrayed throughout time but why I have quit and many things at many

times and each time I quit it was because I remembered just a bit more of

my true heart's desires and not what the outer world told me I should go after

quitting is just as valuable as succeeding yet why do we shun it should

a person not quit something they have no love for just for the sake of enduring

to quit is to rediscover what's in your heart to quit is to acknowledge how you

feel and treat yourself to quit is to command something that's more aligned

with you if you feel it must be done do from a place of love I love you

For more infomation >> Let Love Fuel Your Life Purpose - Duration: 7:56.

-------------------------------------------

EN ZOR HAPİSTEN KAÇMA OYUNU !!! - Fleeing the Complex - Duration: 19:40.

For more infomation >> EN ZOR HAPİSTEN KAÇMA OYUNU !!! - Fleeing the Complex - Duration: 19:40.

-------------------------------------------

Mlg brand - Duration: 1:25.

Boreding AsF 0862516326 Have a space for park a submarine

President chair

*Prayut staring*

For more infomation >> Mlg brand - Duration: 1:25.

-------------------------------------------

3 Creative Ways to Style an Unused Fireplace - HGTV Happy - Duration: 1:26.

For more infomation >> 3 Creative Ways to Style an Unused Fireplace - HGTV Happy - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

We Want You Back (Animated) | DLC YouTube - Duration: 0:31.

We're here with Chuck, founder of Dollar Loan Center.

Hey, what about those that have applied for a loan with DLC in the past and been denied?

Great question!

Unlike banks, we try out best to approve everyone.

But the reality is that some people are going to be denied.

Over 2 Million people have applied with us for a loan.

If you were denied in the past, come on back in.

We'd love to give you another shot.

We've even loosened out lending criteria over the past year.

They could also bring in a co-borrower right?

Of course!

Another good idea.

Get up to $5,000 in just minutes at Dollar Loan Center.

For more infomation >> We Want You Back (Animated) | DLC YouTube - Duration: 0:31.

-------------------------------------------

How to download blob videos? - Mynet - Duration: 11:48.

For more infomation >> How to download blob videos? - Mynet - Duration: 11:48.

-------------------------------------------

Coco Inspired Pan de Muerto & Hot Chocolate | Disney Eats - Duration: 1:54.

[Music]

For more infomation >> Coco Inspired Pan de Muerto & Hot Chocolate | Disney Eats - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

Homekeepers - Dr. David Anderson and Herman Bailey - Duration: 28:32.

For more infomation >> Homekeepers - Dr. David Anderson and Herman Bailey - Duration: 28:32.

-------------------------------------------

Intro ▪ " ByLeGeNdZxD " ▪ ZYCHRON. - Duration: 0:28.

So I can fuck the world for seventy two hours

Goddamn I feel amazing, damn I'm in the matrix

My mind is living on cloud nine and this nine is never on vacation

Start up that Maserati and VROOM VROOM! I'm racing

Poppin' pills in the lobby and I pray they don't find her naked

And I pray you niggas is Satan, shooters go after Judas

Jesus Christ if I live life on my knees, ain't no need to do this

Park it in front of Lueders, next to that Church's Chicken

All you pussies is losers

For more infomation >> Intro ▪ " ByLeGeNdZxD " ▪ ZYCHRON. - Duration: 0:28.

-------------------------------------------

URGENT Whitening Facial Mask At Home/Skin Lightening Formula Treatment for Winter/Skin Care Tips - Duration: 3:55.

Subscribe to my Channel & be a part of Rani G Family

For more infomation >> URGENT Whitening Facial Mask At Home/Skin Lightening Formula Treatment for Winter/Skin Care Tips - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

The Debit Treadmill (Animated) | DLC YouTube - Duration: 0:31.

We're here with Chuck, founder of Dollar Loan Center.

What's this debit treadmill I hear about all the time?

It basically means you keep paying interest, over and over, and your principal never goes

down.

So my loan would never get paid off in that situation?

Exactly!

We make sure you pay a little principal with every payment you make at Dollar Loan Center.

It's called a fully amortized installment loan.

If you pay it off quick, great!

But if you need more time to pay it off, even a year or so, at least you're paid in full

at the end because you were chipping away at the principal on every payment.

Like it should be.

Thanks Chuck!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét