Songs praise the lord
For more infomation >> 明天!6/15乙女遊戲 夢100小說正式開賣!原創劇情+遊戲序號! - Duration: 2:02. 
For more infomation >> Продюсер обругал семью Жанны Фриске (14.06.2017) - Duration: 2:30. 
For more infomation >> Vải có ngon đến mấy khi ăn phải biết điều này không rước họa vào thân - Duration: 3:29. 
For more infomation >> TRAILER Nóng Quá !!! | Phim Ngắn Minecraft - Duration: 0:36. 
For more infomation >> MEXICAN PARTY + THANK YOU FOR 10.000 SUBSCRIBERS!| #ITSDEELIFE | VLOG - Duration: 12:03. 
For more infomation >> 1700訂閱回饋-日本台灣手信抽獎送禮Q&A你問我答大行動|質問コーナー|Questions and Answers - Duration: 8:10. 
For more infomation >> Histoire d'un croissant suite 4 et fin avec Anthony Daumont - Duration: 7:16. 
For more infomation >> Yoshi 2018 E3 2017 trailer CZ - Duration: 1:29. 
For more infomation >> ДАТА РОЖДЕНИЯ 30 ИЮЛЯ🍭СУДЬБА, ХАРАКТЕР и ЗДОРОВЬЕ ТАЙНА ДНЯ РОЖДЕНИЯ - Duration: 6:32. 
For more infomation >> Chelsea begin defence of title at home to Burnley - Duration: 1:28. 
5 FACTS ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE SHARED BY AN ACTUAL CLIMATE SCIENTIST
We at Collective Evolution are by no means �climate change deniers.� The climate
has always changed, and will continue to change over time due to multiple factors and natural
processes.
But there is something fishy going on, and the undeniable fact still remains that most
mainstream science is plagued with economic and political agendas, and is used to push
policy and global elitist agendas.
We must stop destroying our environment, polluting and not taking care of it.
The problem is people have made exposing globalist agendas synonymous with denying climate change,
and this can�t be further from the truth.
It�s similar to the current vaccine controversy, in the sense that scientists who question
the science put out by computer models, which is used to justify various policy decisions,
are ridiculed by the mainstream.
It�s claimed that �97 percent of scientists� agree on the current climate change narrative,
but there seems to be no hard evidence to back up that statement, and with so many of
the world�s top scientists in the field speaking up against �climate alarmism,�
sometimes it seems to be the other way around.
Ivar Giaever, a Norwegian-American physicist who shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1973,
compares current climate science to pseudoscience.
The �97 percent� tagline is often used to demonize those who question anthropogenic
induced climate change, and the mainstream media will do their best to make those who
question it, no matter their background, credentials, or credibility, look foolish.
Hundreds of the world�s most reputable scientists are and have been speaking out about this
politicization of climate science for many years, and a similar trend has emerged across
the sciences, particularly in medicine.
�Peer-reviewed� science was monopolized long ago, and is now plagued with falsities.
�The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps
half, may simply be untrue.
. . . Science has taken a turn towards darkness.�
Dr. Richard Horton
These �skeptical scientists,� as they are commonly referred to, are often made to
look like complete quacks by mainstream media, all for the purpose of making it seem ridiculous,
stupid, and downright outrageous to question the mainstream narrative of climate change.
Dr Richard Lindzen, among many others, refers to this type of narrative as hysteria, and
argues that climate scientists raising this issue have been demonized.
He�s one of the world�s top experts in the field and lead author of �Physical Climate
Processes and Feedbacks,� Chapter 7 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change�s
Third Assessment Report on climate change.
He is a dynamical meteorologist with interests in the broad topics of climate, planetary
waves, monsoon meteorology, planetary atmospheres, and hydrodynamic instability.
His research involves studies of the role of the tropics in mid-latitude weather and
global heat transport, the moisture budget and its role in global change, the origins
of ice ages, seasonal effects in atmospheric transport, stratospheric waves, and the observational
determination of climate sensitivity.
He has made major contributions to the development of the current theory for the Hadley Circulation,
and pioneered the study of how ozone photochemistry, radiative transfer, and dynamics interact
with each other.
He is also the Emeritus Sloan Professor of Meteorology at Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
In many of his lectures, he has pointed out how policymakers were heavily involved with
the IPCC and their publications.
He is one of many to do so.
You can learn more about him and view his publications
and CV
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét