THE HEALTH CARE DEBATE AMONG SENATORS RAGES ON AND OF COURSE
REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO RUSH THROUGH ñ BEFORE THE PROCEDURAL
INSTRUCTIONS RUN OUT OF TIME.
THEN THEY WILL HAVE TO GET MORE TO GET A SIMPLE MAJORITY IN
THE SENATE IN ORDER TO PASS.
MIKE PENCE HAS CHIMED IN ON THIS DEBATE.
RECENTLY HE WAS ON FOX AND FRIENDS TALKING ABOUT SOME OF
THE POTENTIAL FLAWS IN THE PROPOSAL AND WHAT THEY MIGHT
DO TO FIX IT.
TAKE A LOOK.
WHAT YOU SAY WHEN GOVERNORS SAY I AM GETTING 4 BILLION LESS,
I AM NOT FOR THIS?
IT'S TRUE TO SAY THE GRAHAM CASSIDY BILL OVERTIME LEVELS
OUT ON A PER PERSON BASIS THE WAY WE DISTRIBUTE MONEY ON
HEALTHCARE, WHICH I THINK RESONATES WITH MOST AMERICANS.
THAT WE WILL ULTIMATELY GET TO A PLACE WHERE THE RESOURCES THAT
ARE AVAILABLE TO STATES ARE BASED ON A PER INDIVIDUAL BASIS.
WE WILL GET TO THAT, BUT THERE IS TIME IN THE DAYS AHEAD AND IN
FUTURE BUDGETS TO ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES AS THEY ARRIVE?
OKAY, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY.
THERE ARE SOME STATES UNDER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT THAT
RECEIVE MORE MONEY.
THE REASON WHY SOME RECEIVE MORE IS BECAUSE THEY AGREED TO PLAY
BALL WITH THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT MEANING THEY AGREED TO
EXPAND MEDICARE IN THEIR STATES.
THERE ARE OTHER STATES, RED STATES WHO DID NOT CARE ABOUT
THE BEST INTERESTS OF THEIR CONSTITUENTS, REFUSED TO TAKE
THAT MONEY BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE
POSITIVE COMPONENTS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.
I JUST WANT MAKE THAT CLEAR BECAUSE REPUBLICANS ARE SPINNING
THAT AND MAKING IT SEEM LIKE THE LIBERAL STATES ARE GETTING ALL
THIS MONEY WHILE THE RED STATES ARE GETTING SCREWED OVER.
THAT WAS THE DECISION BY THE LAWMAKERS IN THOSE STATES.
THEY COULD'VE GOTTEN THE MONEY AS WELL, ALL THEY HAD TO
DO WAS ASK SO THAT THEIR VOTERS, CONSTITUENTS CAN HAVE BETTER
HEALTHCARE.
EVEN THOUGH IT IS MONEY WE CAN TAKE WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE
IT AND WE WILL DENY OUR OWN CITIZENS.
I AM GREATLY AMUSED BY THE MIKE PENCE VIDEO.
HE SAID LOOK, THIS LEVELS OUT ON A PER PERSON BASIS.
IN OTHER WORDS YES, WE ARE CUTTING FUNDS.
IS A FUNNY POLITICALLY CORRECT WAY TO SAY WE ARE CUTTING
FUNDING.
BUT THE AMUSING PART WAS HE FOLLOWED IT UP BY SAYING IT
REALLY RESONATES WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
WHICH?
THE LEVELING OUT PER PERSON?
NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THAT MEANS.
IT DOESN'T RESONATE WITH ANYONE.
YOU ARE JUST SAYING YEAH, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO LOVE IT WHEN WE
CUT THEIR HEALTHCARE.
IF YOU SAY SO BIG GUY.
KEEP
IN MIND THEY TRIED TO DO THIS WITHOUT GETTING ANY ATTENTION.
THEY WANTED TO JAM IT THROUGH A VOTE, THEY DIDN'T WANT
AMERICANS TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REFLECT ON IT.
THEY DON'T EVEN WANT THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE TO
HAVE THE TIME TO ANALYZE AND SEE WHETHER OR NOT PEOPLE ARE GOING
TO LOSE HEALTH INSURANCE
COVERAGE THROUGH THIS PROPOSAL, WHICH BY THE WAY THEY WILL.
THEY DON'T CARE OR EVEN CONSIDER HOW AMERICANS FEEL ABOUT IT.
THEY DON'T EVEN WANT TO GIVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO THINK
ABOUT IT.
IF IT WAS POPULAR THEY WOULD BE PARADING IT UP AND DOWN THE
STREET.
THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO DO ANY OF THAT BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT IS
NOT POPULAR.
A SIMILAR VERSION OF THIS BILL, YOU KNOW WHAT POPULARITY IT HAD?
17%.
THAT IS DISASTROUSLY LOW.
THAT WILL LEAD TO A LEVELING OUT PER POLITICIAN ON THE
REPUBLICAN SIDE.
THE LYING ABOUT HOW IT RESONATES WITH AMERICANS IS HILARIOUS.
THERE IS ANOTHER PORTION OF AN INTERVIEW WITH FOX AND
FRIENDS THAT I LOVED.
SENATORS HAVE BEEN DODGING THE QUESTION IN REGARD TO WHETHER
OR NOT PEOPLE WILL GET COVERAGE IF THEY HAVE A PRE-EXISTING
CONDITION.
PENCE IS NO EXCEPTION WHEN IT COMES TO THE DODGING.
PEOPLE LIKE JIMMY KIMMEL, THEY ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION BECAUSE IT WILL BE UP TO THE GOVERNOR
TO DECIDE WHO GETS COVERAGE, HOW MANY JUST BURST THAT EVERY
STATE WILL DETERMINE WHAT IS BEST.
WITH THAT CAN YOU GUARANTEE THESE GOVERNORS WILL MAKE SURE
PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE COVERED?
THOMAS JEFFERSON SAID ñ WHO YOU THINK WILL BE MORE
RESPONSIVE TO THE HEALTH CARE
NEEDS IN YOUR COMMUNITY?
YOUR GOVERNOR AND YOUR STATE LEGISLATURE OR A CONGRESSMAN
IN A PRESIDENT IN A FAR-OFF NATION'S CAPITAL?
NO AND ASKED YOU A PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTION.
THAT MEANS NO, YOU WILL NOT BE COVERED IF YOU HAVE A
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION.
SHE HAS A VERY CLIQUISH AND ON FOX AND FRIENDS.
WE JUST WANT TO KNOW WHETHER OR NOT PEOPLE WITH PRE-EXISTING
CONDITIONS WILL GET COVERAGE.
LET'S BE CLEAR.
YOU GUYS ARE THAT FOR YOURSELVES.
IN OTHER WORDS YES YOUR STATE CAN DETERMINE ñ THAT IS CLEAR.
IT PROVES JIMMY KIMMEL'S POINT THAT THE LOUISIANA SENATOR WAS
IN FACT LYING.
THIS DOES NOT COVER PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS.
DONALD TRUMP WHEN HE SAYS IT DOES, OF COURSE IS TELLING HIS
BILLION FLY IN THE ROAD.
YOU CAN TELL BECAUSE THE VICE PRESIDENT JUST SAID IN A POINT
BLANK QUESTION, HE SAID PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS ARE
NOT GOING TO BE COVERED JUST LIKE JEFFERSON WOULD WANT.
IT'S CLEAR THEY ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING THAT IS GOING TO
BENEFIT US.
THERE IS A REASON WHY THEY DON'T WANT THE PUBLIC TO REFLECT ON
IT.
THERE IS A REASON WHY THEY ARE RUSHING THIS SO THEY CAN PASS
IT WITH A SIMPLE MAJORITY RATHER THAN HAVING A LARGER PORTION
OF THE SENATE AGREE ON IT.
IT IS JUST PATHETIC.
THE REASON WHY THIS STORY IS GETTING ATTENTION IS BECAUSE
PEOPLE ARE MORE AWARE OF WHAT IS GOING ON, AND BECAUSE PEOPLE
LIKE JIMMY KIMMEL CONTINUE TO HARP ON THIS ISSUE.
I AM AMUSED ON THE IDEA OF REPUBLICANS QUOTING GIANT
PROGRESSIVES IN HISTORY WHENEVER THEY THINK IT SERVES THEIR
PURPOSE.
JEFFERSON WAS A RADICAL LIBERAL.
HE WAS SO RADICAL HE DID A REVOLUTION AGAINST THE
ESTABLISHMENT.
YOU THINK JEFFERSON WOULD'VE BEEN LIKE DRACONIAN PLANS
THAT SCREW OVER THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, I KIND OF LOVE IT.
I'M NOT SURE YOU GOT THE RIGHT GUY THERE BUDDY.
For more infomation >> #ReaçãoChilena: Dublando Novelas Brasileiras | La Mirada Chilena - Duration: 21:31. 
For more infomation >> (Ep-1) Don't knock Twice Live gameplay with Trixz2007 - Duration: 3:23:56. 
For more infomation >> From foster care to fire cadet, man pursues dream - Duration: 1:47. 
For more infomation >> Геймплейный трейлер бесплатного DLC к Resident Evil 7 "Not a Hero". Русские субтитры. - Duration: 2:52. 
For more infomation >> 🚨 Tiger Stream TV Pricing 🚨 - Duration: 3:20. 
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét