THERE IS A SPECIAL ELECTION TAKING PLACE IN TEXAS, AND IT
TURNS OUT ESTABLISHMENT DEMOCRATS ARE AGGRESSIVELY
PURSUING AN OPPOSITION RESEARCH CAMPAIGN AGAINST A DEMOCRAT
RUNNING IN THE PRIMARY.
HER NAME IS LAURA MOSER, SHE'S A
PROGRESSIVE, AND THE DCCC ABSOLUTELY DESPISES HER. AND
NOTHING MADE THAT MORE CLEAR THAN A RECENT ATTACK THEY
LAUNCHED AGAINST HER WHICH READ AS FOLLOWS, THIS IS FROM
MEREDITH KELLY, DCCC COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR,
SHE SAYS --
>>LET'S STOP FOR A SECOND.
IN 2016 THIS DISTRICT DID VOTE FOR
HILLARY CLINTON, THAT'S WHAT SHE IS REFERRING TO THERE.
UNFORTUNATELY, SHE CONTINUES --
>>
>>LET'S STOP, THEY HAVE AN EVEN WORSE QUOTE THAT WE WILL GET TO
IN A SECOND, BUT THINK ABOUT HOW UNREAL THIS IS.
THIS IS THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY ATTACKING A DEMOCRAT IN THE PRIMARIES.
FIRST
OF ALL, WHAT HAPPENED TO PRETENDING TO BE NEUTRAL DURING
THE PRIMARIES?
I GUESS THAT'S GONE.
YOU WILL FIND OUT IN A
SECOND THEIR FINANCIAL MOTIVATION TO BE OPPOSED TO
LAURA MOSER AND WHY THEY AREN'T NEUTRAL.
SECONDLY, THEY DID AN
OPPOSITION RESEARCH MEMO ON HER.
WHY IS A DEMOCRAT THE
OPPOSITION?
SHOULDN'T YOU BE SPENDING YOUR TIME DOING
OPPOSITION RESEARCH ON THE REPUBLICANS?
THEY ARE SO SOFT IN
THE GENERAL ELECTION.
BUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS GATHERING
OPPOSITION RESEARCH ON FELLOW DEMOCRATS, BECAUSE THEY ARE
PROGRESSIVE.
THIS PROVES EVERYTHING WE WERE WORRIED ABOUT
ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT.
THEY SAID IT
PUBLICLY, WHICH LEADS TO POINT NUMBER THREE ABOUT THAT QUOTE,
YOU CAN'T TAKE IT BACK.
IF LAURA MOSER WINS THE PRIMARY, AND YOU
ARE DAMN RIGHT SHE WILL, WE WILL HAVE THE LINKS DOWN BELOW,
VOLUNTEER, GO TO HER WEBSITE, I COULDN'T OPPOSE THE DCCC MORE ON
THIS ISSUE, BUT IF SHE WINS THE PRIMARY REPUBLICANS WILL RUN ADS
SAYING HER OWN PARTY SAID SHE IS DISQUALIFIED BECAUSE OF HER
DISGUST FOR TEXAS.
YOU MONSTERS.
YOU CORRUPT IDIOTS.
>>CAN WE EMPHASIZE THE IDIOTS PART FOR A SECOND?
IN THEIR MIND
THEY THINK WE WANT TO TAKE BACK THIS DISTRICT, WE DON'T THINK
THIS IS THE MOST VIABLE CANDIDATE, AND WE WILL MAKE A
VERY RARE STEP OF BLASTING ONE OF OUR OWN CANDIDATES.
IF YOU
NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE CREDIBILITY OF THEIR POLITICAL
ANALYSIS, LOOK AT THEIR POLITICAL TACTIC HERE, WHERE THE
NET EFFECT OF THEM ATTACKING HER, JUST LIKE DEBBIE WASSERMAN
SCHULTZ DOING WHAT SHE DID TO BERNIE, HAS THE EFFECT OF
RALLYING TONS OF SUPPORT AROUND HER.
THERE WILL NOW BE LINKS IN
THIS VIDEO, OUR GROUP WILL SEND EMAILS FOR HER TOMORROW, MANY
OTHER GROUPS WERE ENDORSING HER TODAY, SO IF YOU WANT TO THINK
ABOUT THE POLITICAL STRATEGY OF THE DEMOCRATIC
ESTABLISHMENT, THIS IS REPRESENTATIVE OF IT.
SHOOTING OURSELVES IN THE FOOT.
THAT'S WHY WE SHOULDN'T BUY INTO SOME OF THE CONVENTIONAL
WISDOM OF HOW TO FIGHT VARIOUS FIGHTS, WE NEED TO SUPPORT
OUR OWN AND GET SOME REAL PROGRESSIVES ELECTED.
>>ADAM MAKES A GREAT POINT.
THE ONLY UPSIDE OF THIS IS THAT NOW
YOU HAVE ALMOST GUARANTEED HER A VICTORY IN THE PRIMARY.
YOU GUYS
ARE SO STUPID.
THEY THOUGHT IN THEIR BUBBLE, WE'LL SHOW HER.
WE
ALREADY PICKED OUR HAND-PICKED PEOPLE, AND ALL OF OUR RICH
FRIENDS IN WASHINGTON WILL BE SO AGHAST AT LAURA MOSER, THIS WILL
FINISH HER.
NO, WHAT YOU JUST TOLD EVERYONE IS SHE IS THE
ACTUAL PROGRESSIVE IN THE RACE AND DOESN'T REPRESENT THE
DONORS.
THANK YOU, YOU MORONS.
ONE OTHER THING, ADAM SAID WE --
THEY DON'T VIEW THEMSELVES AS PROGRESSIVE.
WE KEEP MAKING THAT
MISTAKE.
I MAKE IT AS WELL FROM TIME TO TIME.
THEY VIEW
THEMSELVES AS, HOW AM I GOING TO GET RICH?
THAT GOES TO THE
SECOND TERRIBLE THING THEY SAID ABOUT LAURA MOSER.
>>LET'S FAST-FORWARD TO GRAPHIC 23.
THE MORE SERIOUS CHARGE,
ACCORDING TO THE INTERCEPT --
>>THAT IS TRUE BUT THAT MONEY WENT INTO THE FIRM'S BANK
ACCOUNT AND IMMEDIATELY WENT OUT OF THE BANK ACCOUNT BECAUSE THAT
FIRM BOUGHT POLITICAL ADS FOR HER, WHICH IS WHAT POLITICAL
CONSULTANTS DO.
HERE IS WHERE THE DCCC FELT LIKE THERE WAS A
MISSTEP.
FIRST OF ALL LET ME BE CLEAR, THE DCCC DUST
SELF-DEALING ALL THE TIME, THEY HAVE THEIR LITTLE LIST OF
CONSULTANTS THAT THEY LITERALLY FORCED DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES TO
WORK WITH, AND THEY MAKE A TON OF MONEY OFF OF TAKING CAMPAIGN
MONEY FROM THESE CANDIDATES AND PADDING THEIR OWN POCKETS.
SO
THE ALLEGATION OF SELF-DEALING FROM PEOPLE WHO DO IT THEMSELVES
IS LAUGHABLE.
WHAT LAURA MOSER DID ISN'T ILLEGAL OR UNUSUAL,
THAT MONEY WENT TOWARD POLITICAL ADS WHICH IS WHAT IT WAS
SUPPOSED TO GO TOWARDS.
>>LET'S BE CLEAR ABOUT WHAT FIRM THIS IS, THIS IS BERNIE'S ONLINE
CONSULTING FIRM, THE ONE THAT HELPED HIM BUILD A GRASSROOTS
ARMY.
ESSENTIALLY WHAT SHE WAS DOING WAS INVESTING IN THE
GRASSROOTS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO BIG-MONEY POLITICS.
IN THIS
MOMENT AS SHE GETS ATTACKED BY THE ESTABLISHMENT IRONICALLY SHE
WILL BE MORE EMPOWERED TO PUT UP A BIG SAIL AND LET THE WIND BLOW
HER CAMPAIGN FORWARD BECAUSE SHE HAS A GRASSROOTS ARMY SHE WAS
INVESTING IN, WHICH IS WHAT WE WANT CANDIDATES TO DO.
I TALKED
TO SOMEONE A COUPLE YEARS AGO WHO WAS THE ONLINE DIRECTOR FOR
A MAJOR SENATOR NOW, AND WHAT THEY SAID WAS IF I MADE ONE
MISTAKE IN THE CAMPAIGN IT WASN'T GOING TO BED EARLY ENOUGH
FOR BIGGER INVESTMENT IN ONLINE BECAUSE THAT IS HOW YOU BUILD A
GRASSROOTS ARMY.
MAYBE 1/5 IS TOO LITTLE, MAYBE SHE SHOULD DO MORE, BUT
GOOD FOR HER FOR INVESTING IN THE GRASSROOTS.
>>THE COMPANY IS CALLED REVOLUTION MESSAGING, IT IS
BERNIE'S COMPANY AS IN NOT THAT HE OWNS IT, HE ALSO USED THEM
DURING THE 2016 CAMPAIGN AND TO GREAT EFFECT.
IF ANYTHING YOU
HAVE JUST DONE AN AD FOR REVOLUTION MESSAGING SO
CONGRATULATIONS.
THE LOSERS WHO WOUND UP LOSING TO DONALD TRUMP
USED OTHER COMPANIES THAT ARE CONNECTED TO THE DCCC AND THE
PEOPLE WHO WORK IN THERE, AND THEY ARE BRAZEN ABOUT THOSE
CONNECTIONS.
BEFORE WE GET INTO THOSE CONNECTIONS LET ME SAY, I
SAID ON THIS SHOW A LONG TIME AGO THAT WHAT DO THE CORRUPT DO?
YOU SEE IT ALL ACROSS THE WORLD, NOT JUST AMERICA, IN FACT THE
CROWN PRINCE IN SAUDI ARABIA IS DOING IT RIGHT NOW.
THE MOST
CORRUPT, THE FIRST THING THEY DO IS THEY SMEAR THE OPPOSITION
WITH CHARGES OF CORRUPTION.
SO WE SAY WAIT A MINUTE, YOU ARE
THE CORRUPT ONE, AND THEY SAY NOW YOU ARE JUST TRYING TO COPY
ME.
SOMETIMES THE SMEAR DOES WORK.
I TALKED TO A PERSON WHO
VOTED FOR BERNIE SANDERS TODAY WHO SAID I DIDN'T KNOW SHE SAID
THAT ABOUT TEXAS.
SO SOMETIMES THE SMEARS WORK.
I THINK IN THE
LONG RUN HERE IT WILL BACKFIRE BECAUSE OF ALL THE THINGS ADAM
HAS EXPLAINED, BUT IF YOU NEVER HEARD ABOUT IT YOU MIGHT THINK
ALL MY GOD, LAURA MOSER IS THE ONE WHO HAS ISSUES.
NO, IT'S THE
DCCC.
IN WASHINGTON, DC THEY ARE KNOWN INFORMALLY AS THE
CONSULTANT FACTORY.
THERE IS THE REVOLVING DOOR, PEOPLE WHO USED
TO WORK AT THE DCCC BECOME CONSULTANTS, AND THEN THEY'RE
GIVEN ALL THE CONTRACTS FROM THE DCCC.
>>THAT IS THE PART THAT INFURIATED ME, THIS IS ALL ABOUT
MAKING MONEY, AND IT'S ABOUT CRUSHING PEOPLE WHO HAVE A
PROGRESSIVE AGENDA THAT THEY CAN'T STAND.
TO GIVE YOU SOME
EXAMPLES OF ELECTED DEMOCRATS WHO HAVE SPOKEN OUT AGAINST THIS
WHOLE CONSULTANT SCAM, REPRESENTED TIM RYAN FROM OHIO
SAID AFTER THE 2016 ELECTIONS THAT THE DCCC --
>>BUT THERE IS MORE, I WANT TO GIVE YOU SPECIFICS --
>>SO THEY ARE JUST MAKING MONEY.
AND KEEP IN MIND, THE
DCCC PRESSURES CANDIDATES TO WORK WITH THEIR CONSULTANTS.
>>I WANT TO MAKE A QUICK POINT ABOUT THAT THEN I WILL LET ANA
CONTINUE, IF BERNIE SANDERS AND REAL PROGRESSIVES LIKE LAURA
MOSER, JAMES THOMPSON IN KANSAS, BRENT WELDER IN KANSAS, ALISON
HARTSON IN CALIFORNIA, THE LIST GOES ON, IF THOSE REAL
PROGRESSIVES WHEN THEY ARE FIGHTING TO GET MONEY OUT OF
POLITICS.
THAT WOULD TAKE MONEY FROM THESE CONSULTANTS, THAT
WOULD BE DEVASTATING TO THEM.
ON THE OTHER HAND WHEN OSSOFF
LOSES, WHO CARES, THEY GOT RICH?
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE IF
YOU WINDSOR LOSES, THEY GOT THE $3.9 MILLION ANYWAY.
THEY DON'T
SHARE YOUR PRIORITIES, THEIR PRIORITY IS HOW DO WE MAKE A
BUCK?
AND FOR THEM TO TURN AROUND AND SMEAR A PROGRESSIVE
LIKE MOSER, BEYOND THE PALE.
>>WHY DO THEY HATE MOSER SO MUCH?
YES IT HAS TO DO WITH HER
PROGRESSIVE VALUES, BUT MOSER ALSO CALLED OUT THE DCCC BACK IN
2017 IN AN ARTICLE SHE WROTE FOR VOGUE, AND IN THAT ARTICLE --
>>IN THAT PIECE SHE WROTE THE FOLLOWING --
>>THE DCCC DIDN'T LIKE THAT SO
THE OPPOSITION RESEARCH BEGAN
IMMEDIATELY.
AND JUST TO CLARIFY WHY SOME PEOPLE, WHY SHE IS
BEING SMEARED AS SOMEONE WHO HATES TEXAS, SHE HAD ONCE SAID
THAT SHE LIKES LIVING IN THE CITY MORE THAN A SMALL TOWN, SO
SHE GAVE THE EXAMPLE OF PARIS, TEXAS AS A PLACE SHE DIDN'T
ENJOY LIVING IN.
AND THE DCCC TOOK THAT OUT OF CONTEXT AND USE THAT TO
SMEAR HER AS SOMEONE WHO HATES TEXAS.
>>SHE WAS REFERRING TO PARIS, TEXAS, WHERE HER GRANDPARENTS
ARE FROM, WHICH IS HUNDREDS OF MILES AWAY FROM HER DISTRICT.
BUT THEY MADE IT SEEM LIKE SHE'S SAYING IT ABOUT HER OWN VOTERS
AND HER OWN DISTRICT.
A DISINGENUOUS LIVE FROM THE DCCC,
WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED?
I GUESS THIS IS A DECLARATION OF WAR
AGAINST ALL PROGRESSIVES.
MOSER IS ALSO A JUSTICE DEMOCRATS, AND
JUSTICE DEMOCRATS, THE ONE THING YOU SHOULD KNOW, YOU CAN LOOK AT
THEIR PROGRESSIVE PLATFORM, A LOT OF GROUPS ARE PROGRESSIVE,
BUT ALL OF THEM HAVE PLEDGED NOT TO TAKE CORPORATE PAC MONEY,
THE JUSTICE DEMOCRATS.
THAT IS WHAT MAKES THE CONSULTANTS IN DC
FURIOUS.
IN REALITY, THE NEW EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR THE DCCC
IS MARRIED TO A WOMAN WHO AFTER HE WAS SELECTED, HIS WIFE WOUND
UP BEING A PARTNER AT A CONSULTING FIRM AND THE DCCC
PAID THEM A LOT OF MONEY IN THE 2016 ELECTION, AND OF ALREADY
FUNNELED MONEY TO THEM IN THIS CYCLE.
THERE ARE MORE DETAILS,
WE WILL PUT THE ARTICLE FROM THE INTERCEPT IN THE DESCRIPTION BOX
AS WELL, WRITTEN BY EXCELLENT REPORTERS.
>>YOU MIGHT HAVE DONE THEM A FAVOR BY OUTING THEM IN THIS
SITUATION BECAUSE THIS IS THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG, THEY HAVE
MADE EXPLICIT WHAT THEY DO BEHIND THE SCENES EVERY DAY.
WE
TALKED TO SO MANY CANDIDATES WHO FEEL PRESSURED BY THEM, WHO ARE
ENCOURAGED TO GET OUT OF THE RACE BY THEM, EVEN THOSE WHO ARE
AHEAD IN FUNDRAISING, THIS SHOULD BE A RALLYING CRY FOR ALL
OF US IN A WAKE-UP CALL.
I KNOW MY GRANDMA IN THE PAST HAS TOLD
ME I WROTE A $10 CHECK TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, AND I'M LIKE,
GRANDMA, I LIKE WHERE YOU ARE GOING IN GENERAL, BUT LET ME
TALK ABOUT OTHER PLACES TO DONATE.
BUT PEOPLE JUST ASSUME
GOOD INTENTIONS, AND THEY ARE NOT ONLY UNDERMINING OUR AGENDA,
BUT I BELIEVE UNDERMINING OUR ABILITY TO WIN. AND I SAY WE IN
THE BROAD SENSE, THOSE WHO WANT A BIG RESISTANCE VICTORY IN
2018, OUR ABILITY TO WIN.
BECAUSE THEY ARE SABOTAGING US BY PUTTING LAME PEOPLE ON
THE BALLOT AND UNDERMINING PEOPLE WHO COULD WIN.
>>IT'S A STORY WE BROKE, MICHAEL TRACY BROKE IT, IT IS
REFERENCED IN THIS INTERCEPT STORY, THERE IS A MEMO THEY SENT
TO ALL THE CANDIDATES.
ONE OF THEM SAID DON'T ATTACK ONE
ANOTHER.
OOPS.
YOU JUST ATTACKED A CANDIDATE IN PRIMARY VIOLATING
YOUR OWN MEMO IN THE MOST BRAZEN WAY I'VE EVER SEEN, APPARENTLY
YOU DIDN'T MEAN IT.
WHAT YOU MEANT WAS PROGRESSIVES, UNILATERALLY SURRENDER TO
ESTABLISHMENT CANDIDATES.
>>DON'T ATTACK US, THAT IS WHAT THEY MEANT.
>>THEY ARE THE WORST HYPOCRITES.
BUT NUMBER TWO, THEY
TOLD THE CANDIDATES, THAT'S WHAT JAMES THOMPSON, A PROGRESSIVE
FROM KANSAS WHO ALMOST WON LAST TIME, THAT'S WHAT HE OBJECTED
TO, WHY DO I HAVE TO SPEND ALL THIS MONEY WITH ONLY THE
CONSULTANTS ON YOUR LIST?
WHAT IF I FOUND A GREAT PERSON
WORKING IN THE MIDDLE OF KANSAS?
YOU WON'T HELP ME UNLESS I SPEND
MOST OF MY MONEY WITH THOSE CONSULTANTS THAT YOU ARE IN BED
WITH?
HE SAID SORRY, I'M NOT DOING IT.
THAT'S WHAT ALL THESE
PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATES SHOULD SAY, AND TO ADAM'S POINT, ALL OF
YOU OUT THERE, IF YOU ARE GOING TO GIVE MONEY, THAT'S GREAT,
BECAUSE SMALL DONATIONS POOLED TOGETHER ARE MORE EFFECTIVE AND
POWERFUL AND WILL BEAT THESE CORPORATE PACS, BUT GIVE THEM TO
PROGRESSIVE GROUPS YOU TRUST, BECAUSE THOSE GROUPS HAVE EARNED
YOUR TRUST.
DON'T JUST HAND IT OVER TO PEOPLE WHO CALL THEMSELVES
DEMOCRATS.
>>CHECK OUT THE LINKS BELOW, WONDERFUL STORY BY THE
INTERCEPT, AND ALL THE CANDIDATES WE MENTIONED, WE WILL
PUT THEIR LINKS DOWN BELOW, GIVE THEM SMALL DOLLAR DONATIONS
DIRECTLY, DON'T RUN IT THROUGH
THE CONSULTANT FACTORY.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét