Thứ Hai, 27 tháng 11, 2017

Waching daily Nov 27 2017

Captions are on! Click CC at bottom right to turn off.

Hear updates by following us on Twitter (@AmoebaSisters) or Facebook!

I really did not like sandboxes as a kid.

It's not that I have a problem with sand or sand on the beach for sand castles.

Just sand boxes.

See, as a little kid, I'd play with something, then I'd kind of forget about it--- and

then rediscover it and it'd be all new again.

This is what happened with my sandbox.

Except when I rediscovered my sandbox, the sand had all these tiny holes.

My dad was with me and exclaimed, "Why look at that, your sandbox is full of antlions!"

Perhaps my dad should not have assumed that I knew what antlions were.

I eventually figured out what they were, later on, and it makes sense now because my father

really loves insects.

Antlions are insects.

In their adult form they sort of look—in my personal opinion---like a less cool version

of a dragonfly- they are not a dragonfly.

But in their larvae stage- they look---well like not many things I can compare it to.

They have these mandibles and they make these sand pit traps.

And then they wait with their mandibles just showing above the surface.

When an ant or other small insect walks over their sand pit, they drag it in.

They pull the ant underground, biting it and injecting it with enzymes to digest it, in

order to consume the ant's juices.

I also have learned, by watching them, that they toss sand at their ant victim too if

they need help subduing it before they drag them under.

Thankfully, antlions are small.

In fact, 'doodlebug' is evidently another name for these things---I'm not exactly

sure how you go from antlion to doodlebug---but okay.

It's all relative; they're bad news for an ant.

Because the antlion is a predator of the ant.

The ant is their prey.

That's an ecological relationship right there.

And that's what we're going to talk about---ecological relationships.

Typically if we were to graph the predator and prey populations in our example---when

the population of ants in this confined area increase, it is likely that the antlions---which

are the predators---also will increase over time because they have more food to eat.

However, if the antlions increase too much, there won't be enough ants---which are the

prey----to feed on.

So the antlions will decrease.

You can see that relationship in this predator and prey graph.

In most ecosystems, predator and prey graphs go up and down frequently---it cycles.

Also, just because this antlion is a predator doesn't mean that this is the only role

it plays.

An antlion can get eaten by a bird.

Now the antlion has just become the bird's prey.

Competition is also another relationship to consider.

Antlions are consumers which means that they have to eat other things- they can't make

their own food.

They have to compete with other antlions for this food too, this food being their prey:

the ants.

This example shows competition for a limiting biotic factor.

And they're not just competing with other antlions for this biotic factor--- they may

have to compete with completely different species in the area that are also predators

of ants too.

For example, jumping spiders like ants.

You know…it's not just consumers that compete!

Producers, like this plant, make their own food---but that does not mean they don't

have to deal with competition.

For example, this plant here is competing for this limiting abiotic factor: light.

Symbiotic relationships are specific types of relationships where different species live

together.

Parasitism is an example of a symbiotic relationship where one organism benefits and the other

is harmed.

An example?

Well, you know, I love dogs- Petunia is the cat person.

When my family took in our rescue dog---she was 4 months old at the time--- we learned

from the vet that she would need to be treated for fleas and hookworms.

We were able to give her medicine to treat these parasites---a good thing---because these

parasites can hurt the dog by feeding on their blood.

A parasite is an organism that gets its nutrients from another organism and causes harm to its

host.

They can live inside or on their host.

Mutualism is an example of a symbiotic relationship where both organisms involved benefit.

You really need to look up a video about acacia ants and acacia trees because this is a fascinating

example.

See, some species of acacia trees form these hollow thorns which provide housing to acacia

ants.

Some species even provide a nectar for food for these ants.

So with a great home and potentially free food, what does the tree get in return?

Protection.

I'd hate to be a type of consumer that eats acacia trees because if it has acacia ants,

the ants will come out of the thorns and attack the consumer.

They'll even destroy plants that try to try to grow close to the acacia tree so the

ants can eliminate the tree's competition.

Nice mutual relationship between the acacia tree and the ant.

The last symbiotic relationship we'll mention is commensalism.

This one is interesting, because in this relationship, one organism benefits and the other is neither

helped nor harmed: it has a neutral effect.

Some species of barnacles and whales are a great example.

Many barnacle species can attach themselves to moving things, like a boat…or a whale.

On a free whale ride, the barnacles get a lot of access to food since they are filter

feeders, and the whale may travel to nutrient rich waters.

In this particular example, the barnacles benefit but neither help nor harm the whale

so this would be commensalism.

But I do like to remind my students that sometimes there is more to the story with a relationship

labeled as commensalism and sometimes what we thought was a completely neutral effect-

may not always be in every case.

So why do all these relationships matter anyway?

Well, ONE reason is that these interactions can make significant impacts on populations

of different species living together.

That means if the population of a certain species is threatened by human activity for

example, it can affect more than just that one species.

Scientists continue to learn about new ecological relationships all the time.

Well that's it for the Amoeba Sisters and we remind you to stay curious.

For more infomation >> Ecological Relationships - Duration: 6:50.

-------------------------------------------

Jiló ft. Nego Max - Forjado no Deserto [Clipe Oficial] - Duration: 2:32.

For more infomation >> Jiló ft. Nego Max - Forjado no Deserto [Clipe Oficial] - Duration: 2:32.

-------------------------------------------

Winx Club 5 Alyssa Harmonix! - Duration: 0:39.

Alyssa, Fairy of the Space Lights!

For more infomation >> Winx Club 5 Alyssa Harmonix! - Duration: 0:39.

-------------------------------------------

DOCE ILUSÃO [ANIME ZUEIRA] - (k) - Duration: 3:03.

For more infomation >> DOCE ILUSÃO [ANIME ZUEIRA] - (k) - Duration: 3:03.

-------------------------------------------

DELICIOUS 96oz STEAK CHALLENGE!! - Duration: 7:44.

Hey everybody this is Randy Santel "Atlas" with Atlas & Zeus Promotions and

proud owner of foodchallenges.com! Very very excited tonight I have not had a

massive steak in forever! It's day three of our tour still in the Chicago metro

area well tonight I'm in Valparaiso, Indiana on the Kelsey's Steakhouse I'm

taking on their six pound steak challenge! now going for win number three

of the trip and overall win number 484 but I've got one full hour to finish

this six pound or 96 ounce steak, along with I had a choice of potatoes just to

be unique I went with some red potatoes which has some healthy green peppers

then we've got this awesome healthy salad there with croutons on top

and then I think I only have to finish like one thing of bread but if we're

feeling good we'll probably just finish it all, get some more carbs along with

all this protein but one hour if I win I'm gonna get the $70 meal for free a

sweet t-shirt and I'll be one of the very very few people up on the wall of

fame let's get this challenge started!

A little bit worried about this one because that burger I did yesterday was

way easier than I was expecting which didn't really get my stomach ready for

this, but I think I'll be able to get it down it looks awesome looks like a very

nice cut of meat so thanks to Kelsey's for the awesome looking steak challenge

let's get it started one, two, three!

Oh yeah!

6 minutes 40 seconds hen I still over all these years have not gotten any

better with a knife before but it's going down it's nice and juicy awesome

steak!

17 minutes 40 seconds in getting almost two-thirds of the way through I'm saving

the last ones they're keeping it kind of warm,

hopefully juicy I'll eat that last after finishing these bikes but let's get this

victory!

Thirty minutes and ten seconds just over halfway through the time limit still

have plenty of time and I'm way more than halfway through the show I think

we'll get the win!

35 minutes and 15 seconds that was a lot of mastication all that shooting really

has my jar hurting, but we're gonna move on to the potatoes because I'm sure they're

cold we'll get those down then the salad and then we'll do the bread

wondering what that was - it was is tomato!

I'm getting full and there's no need to be cocky, I didn't do that good, so 41

minutes and 40 seconds in so I'm gonna have the largest slice there is with

some butter who's the only have to do one and then we'll have to win

we'll have one more just to leave no doubt

Forty-two minutes and 58 seconds they don't really know what the record is but

they know not many people have won this thing I think they said only like

three or four and it's been going on for like thirty years now but awesome

awesome state love the first two thirds of that thing and the last third was

good too but I don't want anymore stick for at least three days but 42 minutes

58 seconds I'm going to get the $70 steak for free the steak meal I'll get a

sweet t-shirt which is actually right here they'll be taking it out of the

case for me the Kelsey's Steak and Seafood here in

Valparaiso, Indiana but thank you - Kelsey's for the awesome meal it was so

so good it was my first steak went in a long time and then it was number three

of the trip and overall win number 484 but thank you to Cal C's thank you guys

all for coming to watch and thank you for watching!

For more infomation >> DELICIOUS 96oz STEAK CHALLENGE!! - Duration: 7:44.

-------------------------------------------

XBOX ONLY!! | FREE Xp And Camo LOBBIES!! || Gta cash drops||#RoadTo 2k #SilcaArmy - Duration: 50:05.

For more infomation >> XBOX ONLY!! | FREE Xp And Camo LOBBIES!! || Gta cash drops||#RoadTo 2k #SilcaArmy - Duration: 50:05.

-------------------------------------------

Top 10 music of 2017 reached over 10 million views - Duration: 29:51.

Top 10 music of 2017 reached over 10 million views

For more infomation >> Top 10 music of 2017 reached over 10 million views - Duration: 29:51.

-------------------------------------------

10 - Uma Ópera em Estocolmo - As Viagens do Gerson - Duration: 3:58.

For more infomation >> 10 - Uma Ópera em Estocolmo - As Viagens do Gerson - Duration: 3:58.

-------------------------------------------

Pare de fumar com remédios naturais - Duration: 8:43.

For more infomation >> Pare de fumar com remédios naturais - Duration: 8:43.

-------------------------------------------

Alan Walker - Fade [NPC Nguồn Phát] - Duration: 4:21.

For more infomation >> Alan Walker - Fade [NPC Nguồn Phát] - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

The Anti-Federalist Papers | Centinel I - Duration: 27:37.

To

the Freemen of Pennsylvania

Friends, Countrymen and Fellow Citizens, Permit one of yourselves to put you in mind of certain

liberties and privileges secured to you by the constitution of this commonwealth, and

to beg your serious attention to his uninterested opinion upon the plan of federal government

submitted to your consideration, before you surrender these great and valuable privileges

up forever.

Your present frame of government, secures to you a right to hold yourselves, houses,

papers and possessions free from search and seizure, and therefore warrants granted without

oaths or affirmations first made, affording sufficient foundation for them, whereby any

officer or messenger may be commanded or required to search your houses or seize your persons

or property, not particularly described in such warrant, shall not be granted.

Your constitution further provides "that in controversies respecting property, and

in suits between man and man, the parties have a right to trial by jury, which ought

to be held sacred."

It also provides and declares "that the people have a right of FREEDOM OF SPEECH,

and of WRITING and PUBLISHING their sentiments, therefore THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS OUGHT NOT

TO BE RESTRAINED."

The constitution of Pennsylvania is yet in existence, as yet you have the right to freedom

of speech, and of publishing your sentiments.

How long those rights will appertain to you, you yourselves are called upon to say, whether

your houses shall continue to be your castles; whether your papers, your persons and your

property, are to be held sacred and free from general warrants, you are now to determine.

Whether the trial by jury is to continue as your birth-right, the freemen of Pennsylvania,

nay, of all America, are now called upon to declare.

Without presuming upon my own judgement, I cannot think it an unwarrantable presumption

to offer my private opinion, and call upon others for their's; and if I use my pen

with the boldness of a freeman, it is because I know that the liberty of the press yet remains

unviolated, and juries yet are judges.

The late Convention have submitted to your consideration a plan of a new federal government–The

subject is highly interesting to your future welfare–Whether it be calculated to promote

the great ends of civil society, viz. the happiness and prosperity of the community;

it behoves you well to consider, uninfluenced by the authority of names.

Instead of that frenzy of enthusiasm, that has actuated the citizens of Philadelphia,

in their approbation of the proposed plan, before it was possible that it could be the

result of a rational investigation into its principles; it ought to be dispassionately

and deliberately examined, and its own intrinsic merit the only criterion of your patronage.

If ever free and unbiased discussion was proper or necessary, it is on such an occasion.–All

the blessings of liberty and the dearest privileges of freemen, are now at stake and dependent

on your present conduct.

Those who are competent to the task of developing the principles of government, ought to be

encouraged to come forward, and thereby the better enable the people to make a proper

judgment; for the science of government is so abstruse, that few are able to judge for

themselves; without such assistance the people are too apt to yield an implicit assent to

the opinions of those characters, whose abilities are held in the highest esteem, and to those

in whose integrity and patriotism they can confide; not considering that the love of

domination is generally in proportion to talents, abilities, and superior acquirements; and

that the men of the greatest purity of intention may be made instruments of despotism in the

hands of the artful and designing.

If it were not for the stability and attachment which time and habit gives to forms of government

it would be in the power of the enlightened and aspiring few, if they should combine,

at any time to destroy the best establishments, and even make the people the instruments of

their own subjugation.

The late revolution having effaced in a great measure all former habits, and the present

institutions are so recent, that there exists not that great reluctance to innovation, so

remarkable in old communities, and which accords with reason, for the most comprehensive mind

cannot foresee the full operation of material changes on civil polity; it is the genius

of the common law to resist innovation.

The wealthy and ambitious, who in every community think they have a right to lord it over their

fellow creatures, have availed themselves, very successfully, of this favorable disposition;

for the people thus unsettled in their sentiments, have been prepared to accede to any extreme

of government; all the distresses and difficulties they experience, proceeding from various causes,

have been ascribed to the impotency of the present confederation, and thence they have

been led to expect full relief from the adoption of the proposed system of government, and

in the other event, immediately ruin and annihilation as a nation.

These characters flatter themselves that they have lulled all distrust and jealousy of their

new plan, by gaining the concurrence of the two men in whom America has the highest confidence,

and now triumphantly exult in the completion of their long meditated schemes of power and

aggrandisement.

I would be very far from insinuating that the two illustrious personages alluded to,

have not the welfare of their country at heart, but that the unsuspecting goodness and zeal

of the one, has been imposed on, in a subject of which he must be necessarily inexperienced,

from his other arduous engagements; and that the weakness and indecision attendant on old

age, has been practiced on in the other.

I am fearful that the principles of government inculcated in Mr. [John] Adams's treatise,

and enforced in the numerous essays and paragraphs in the newspapers, have misled some well designing

members of the late Convention.–But it will appear in the sequel, that the construction

of the proposed plan of government is infinitely more extravagant.

I have been anxiously expecting that some enlightened patriot would, ere this, have

taken up the pen to expose the futility, and counteract the baneful tendency of such principles.

Mr. Adams's sine qua non of a good government is three balancing powers, whose repelling

qualities are to produce an equilibrium of interests, and thereby promote the happiness

of the whole community.

He asserts that the administrators of every government, will ever be actuated by views

of private interest and ambition, to the prejudice of the public good; that therefore the only

effectual method to secure the rights of the people and promote their welfare, is to create

an opposition of interests between the members of two distinct bodies, in the exercise of

the powers of government, and balanced by those of a third.

This hypothesis supposes human wisdom competent to the task of instituting three co-equal

orders in government, and a corresponding weight in the community to enable them respectively

to exercise their several parts, and whose views and interests should be so distinct

as to prevent a coalition of any two of them for the destruction of the third.

Mr. Adams, although he has traced the constitution of every form of government that ever existed,

as far as history affords materials, has not been able to adduce a single instance of such

a government; he indeed says that the British constitution is such in theory, but this is

rather a confirmation that his principles are chimerical and not to be reduced to practice.

If such an organization of power were practicable, how long would it continue?

not a day–for there is so great a disparity in the talents, wisdom and industry of mankind,

that the scale would presently preponderate to one or the other body, and with every accession

of power the means of further increase would be greatly extended.

The state of society in England is much more favorable to such a scheme of government than

that of America.

There they have a powerful hereditary nobility, and real distinctions of rank and interests;

but even there, for want of that perfect equallity of power and distinction of interests, in

the three orders of government, they exist but in name; the only operative and efficient

check, upon the conduct of administration, is the sense of the people at large.

Suppose a government could be formed and supported on such principles, would it answer the great

purposes of civil society; If the administrators of every government are actuated by views

of private interest and ambition, how is the welfare and happiness of the community to

be the result of such jarring adverse interests?

Therefore, as different orders in government will not produce the good of the whole, we

must recur to other principles.

I believe it will be found that the form of government, which holds those entrusted with

power, in the greatest responsibility to their constituents, the best calculated for freemen.

A republican, or free government, can only exist where the body of the people are virtuous,

and where property is pretty equally divided; in such a government the people are the sovereign

and their sense or opinion is the criterion of every public measure; for when this ceases

to be the case, the nature of the government is changed, and an aristocracy, monarchy or

despotism will rise on its ruin.

The highest responsibility is to be attained, in a simple structure of government, for the

great body of the people never steadily attend to the operations of government, and for want

of due information are liable to be imposed on–If you complicate the plan by various

orders, the people will be perplexed and divided in their sentiments about the source of abuses

or misconduct, some will impute it to the senate, others to the house of representatives,

and so on, that the interposition of the people may be rendered imperfect or perhaps wholly

abortive.

But if, imitating the constitution of Pennsylvania, you vest all the legislative power in one

body of men (separating the executive and judicial) elected for a short period, and

necessarily excluded by rotation from permanency, and guarded from precipitancy and surprise

by delays imposed on its proceedings, you will create the most perfect responsibility

for then, whenever the people feel a grievance they cannot mistake the authors, and will

apply the remedy with certainty and effect, discarding them at the next election.

This tie of responsibility will obviate all the dangers apprehended from a single legislature,

and will the best secure the rights of the people.

Having premised this much, I shall now proceed to the examination of the proposed plan of

government, and I trust, shall make it appear to the meanest capacity, that it has none

of the essential requisites of a free government; that it is neither founded on those balancing

restraining powers, recommended by Mr. Adams and attempted in the British constitution,

or possessed of that responsibility to its constituents, which, in my opinion, is the

only effectual security for the liberties and happiness of the people; but on the contrary,

that it is a most daring attempt to establish a despotic aristocracy among freemen, that

the world has ever witnessed.

I shall previously consider the extent of the powers intended to be vested in Congress,

before I examine the construction of the general government.

It will not be controverted that the legislative is the highest delegated power in government,

and that all others are subordinate to it.

The celebrated Montesquieu establishes it as a maxim, that legislation necessarily follows

the power of taxation.

By sect.

8, of the first article of the proposed plan of government, "the Congress are to have

power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide

for the common defence and general welfare of the United States, but all duties, imposts

and excises, shall be uniform throughout the United States."

Now what can be more comprehensive than these words; not content by other sections of this

plan, to grant all the great executive powers of a confederation, and a STANDING ARMY IN

TIME OF PEACE, that grand engine of oppression, and moreover the absolute control over the

commerce of the United States and all external objects of revenue, such as unlimited imposts

upon imports, etc.–they are to be vested with every species of internal taxation–whatever

taxes, duties and excises that they may deem requisite for the general welfare, may be

imposed on the citizens of these states, levied by the officers of Congress, distributed through

every district in America; and the collection would be enforced by the standing army, however

grievous or improper they may be.

The Congress may construe every purpose for which the state legislatures now lay taxes,

to be for the general welfare, and thereby seize upon every object of revenue.

The judicial power by 1st sect. of article 3 "shall extend to all cases, in law and

equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made

or which shall be made under their authority; to all cases affecting ambassadors, other

public ministers and consuls; to all cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction, to

controversies to which the United States shall be a party, to controversies between two or

more states, between a state and citizens of another state, between citizens of different

states, between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states,

and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects."

The judicial power to be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such Inferior Courts as the

Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.

The objects of jurisdiction recited above, are so numerous, and the shades of distinction

between civil causes are oftentimes so slight, that it is more than probable that the state

judicatories would be wholly superceded; for in contests about jurisdiction, the federal

court, as the most powerful, would ever prevail.

Every person acquainted with The history of the courts in England, knows by what ingenious

sophisms they have, at different periods, extended the sphere of Their jurisdiction

over objects out of the line of their institution, and contrary to their very nature; courts

of a criminal jurisdiction obtaining cognizance in civil causes.

To put the omnipotency of Congress over the state government and judicatories out of all

doubt, the 6th article ordains that "this constitution and the laws of the United States

which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made

under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land, and

the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of any

state to the contrary notwithstanding."

By these sections the all-prevailing power of taxation, and such extensive legislative

and judicial powers are vested in the general government, as must in their operation, necessarily

absorb the state legislatures and judicatories; and that such was in the contemplation of

the framers of it, will appear from the provision made for such event, in another part of it;

(but that, fearful of alarming the people by so great an innovation, they have suffered

the forms of the separate governments to remain, as a blind.)

By sect. 4th of the 1st article, "the times, places and manner of holding elections for

senators and representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof;

but the Congress may at any time, by law, make or alter such regulations, except as

to the place of chusing senators."

The plain construction of which is, that when the state legislatures drop out of sight,

from the necessary operation this government, then Congress are to provide for the election

and appointment of representatives and senators.

If the foregoing be a just comment–if the united states are to be melted down into one

empire, it becomes you to consider, whether such a government, however constructed, would

be eligible in so extended a territory; and whether it would be practicable, consistent

with freedom?

It is the opinion of the greatest writers, that a very extensive country cannot be governed

on democratical principles, on any other plan, than a confederation of a number of small

republics, possessing all the powers of internal government, but united in the management of

their foreign and general concerns.

It would not be difficult to prove, that any thing short of despotism, could not bind so

great a country under one government; and that whatever plan you might, at the first

setting out, establish, it would issue in a despotism.

If one general government could be instituted and maintained on principles of freedom, it

would not be so competent to attend to the various local concerns and wants, of every

particular district, as well as the peculiar governments, who are nearer the scene, and

possessed of superior means of information, besides, if the business of the whole union

is to be managed by one government, there would not be time.

Do we not already see, that the inhabitants in a number of larger states, who are remote

from the seat of government, are loudly complaining of the inconveniencies and disadvantages they

are subjected to on this account, and that, to enjoy the comforts of local government,

they are separating into smaller divisions.

Having taken a review of the powers, I shall now examine the construction of the proposed

general government.

Art.

1.

Sect.

1.

"All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States,

which shall consist of a senate and house of representatives."

By another section? the president (the principal executive officer) has a conditional control

over their proceedings.

Sect.

2.

"The house of representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year, by the

people of the several states.

The number of representatives shall not exceed one for every 30,000 inhabitants."

The senate, the other constituent branch of the legislature, is formed by the legislature

of each state appointing two senators, for the term of six years.

The executive power by Art.

2, Sect.

1. is to be vested in a president of the United States of America, elected for four years:

Sect.

2.

gives him "power, by and with the consent of the senate to make treaties, provided two

thirds of the senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice

and consent of the senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges

of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are

not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law," etc.

And by another section he has the absolute power of granting reprieves and pardons for

treason and all other high crimes and misdemeanors, except in case of impeachment.

The foregoing are the outlines of the plan.

Thus we see, the house of representatives, are on the part of the people to balance the

senate, who I suppose will be composed of the better sort, the well born, etc.

The number of the representatives (being only one for every 30,000 inhabitants) appears

to be too few, either to communicate the requisite information, of the wants, local circumstances

and sentiments of so extensive an empire, or to prevent corruption and undue influence,

in the exercise of such great powers; the term for which they are to be chosen, too

long to preserve a due dependence and accountability to their constituents; and the mode and places

of their election not sufficiently ascertained, for as Congress have the control over both,

they may govern the choice, by ordering the representatives of a whole state, to be elected

in one place, and that too may be the most inconvenient.

The senate, the great efficient body in this plan of government, is constituted on the

most unequal principles.

The smallest state in the union has equal weight with the great states of Virginia Massachusetts,

or Pennsylvania–The Senate, besides its legislative functions, has a very considerable

share in the Executive; none of the principal appointments to office can be made without

its advice and consent.

The term and mode of its appointment, will lead to permanency; the members are chosen

for six years, the mode is under the control of Congress, and as there is no exclusion

by rotation, they may be continued for life, which, from their extensive means of influence,

would follow of course.

The President, who would be a mere pageant of state, unless he coincides with the views

of the Senate, would either become the head of the aristocratic junto in that body, or

its minion, besides, their influence being the most predominant, could the best secure

his re-election to office.

And from his power of granting pardons, he might skreen from punishment the most treasonable

attempts on liberties of the people, when instigated by the Senate.

From this investigation into the organization of this government, it appears that it is

devoid of all responsibility or accountability to the great body of the people, and that

so far from being a regular balanced government, it would be in practice a permanent ARISTOCRACY.

The framers of it, actuated by the true spirit of such a government, which ever abominates

and suppresses all free enquiry and discussion, have made no provision for the liberty of

the press that grand palladium of freedom, and scourge of tyrants, but observed a total

silence on that head.

It is the opinion of some great writers, that if the liberty of the press, by an institution

of religion, or otherwise, could be rendered sacred, even in Turkey, that despotism would

fly before it.

And it is worthy of remark, that there is no declaration of personal rights, premised

in most free constitutions; and that trial by jury in civil cases is taken away; for

what other construction can be put on the following, viz.

Article m.

Sect. 2d.

"In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in

which a State shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction.

In all the other cases above mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction,

both as to law and fact?"

It would be a novelty in jurisprudence, as well as evidently improper to allow an appeal

from the verdict of a jury, on the matter of fact; therefore, it implies and allows

of a dismission of the jury in civil cases, and especially when it is considered, that

jury trial in criminal cases is expresly stipulated for, but not in civil cases.

But our situation is represented to be so critically dreadful that, however reprehensible

and exceptionable the proposed plan of government may be, there is no alternative, between the

adoption of it and absolute ruin.–My fellow citizens, things are not at that crisis, it

is the argument of tyrants; the present distracted state of Europe secures us from injury on

that quarter, and as to domestic dissensions, we have not so much to fear from them, as

to precipitate us into this form of government, without it is a safe and a proper one.

For remember, of all possible evils that of despotism is the worst and the most to be

dreaded.

Besides, it cannot be supposed, that the first essay on so difficult a subject, is so well

digested, as it ought to be,–if the proposed plan, after a mature deliberation, should

meet the approbation of the respective States, the matter will end, but if it should be found

to be fraught with dangers and inconveniencies, a future general Convention being in possession

of the objections, will be the better enabled to plan a suitable government.

Who's here so base, that would a bondsman be?

If any, speak; for him have I offended.

Who's here so vile, that will not love his country?

If any, speak; for him have I offended.

—Julius Caesar, Act 3, Scene 2

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét