Trump Warns There Is A Chance Of A Major, Major Conflict With North Korea
by Tyler Durden
While emoting sympathy for Kim Jong Un's situation, President Trump told Reuters, during a lengthy
interview ahead of his 100th day in office, that he'd "love to solve things diplomatically,"
but warned that "there is a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict
with North Korea."
Putting a somewhat human face on the North Korean leader, President Trump had an interesting
response when asked by Reuters if he considered North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to be rational...
"He's 27 years old.
His father dies, took over a regime.
So say what you want but that is not easy, especially at that age.
"I'm not giving him credit or not giving him credit, I'm just saying that's a very hard
thing to do.
As to whether or not he's rational, I have no opinion on it.
I hope he's rational."
And that is perhaps why he stil holds out hope for a path that avoids the military option...
"We'd love to solve things diplomatically but it's very difficult,"
Emphasizing the possibility of new sanctions, and in particular leverage from China..
"I have established a very good personal relationship with President Xi"
"I believe he is trying very hard.
He certainly doesn�t want to see turmoil and death.
He doesn�t want to see it.
He is a good man.
He is a very good man and I got to know him very well."
Still, as Reuters notes, just a day after he and his top national security advisers
briefed U.S. lawmakers declaring North Korea "an urgent national security threat and top
foreign policy priority;" and one day before Secretary of State Rex Tillerson will press
the United Nations Security Council on sanctions to further isolate Pyongyang over its nuclear
and missile programs, it's clear where this could lead...
"There is a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict with North Korea.
Absolutely."
U.S. officials said military strikes remained an option but played down the prospect, though
the administration has sent an aircraft carrier and a nuclear-powered submarine to the region
in a show of force.
For more infomation >> Trump Warns There Is A Chance Of A Major, Major Conflict With North Korea - Duration: 2:37.-------------------------------------------
Giant Gummy Brain! | 6 Hilarious Vat19 Products! - Duration: 36:59.
For more infomation >> Giant Gummy Brain! | 6 Hilarious Vat19 Products! - Duration: 36:59. -------------------------------------------
Cool Websites to go on When You Are Bored - Duration: 6:10.
For more infomation >> Cool Websites to go on When You Are Bored - Duration: 6:10. -------------------------------------------
1000PS review - Harley Davidson Road King vs Indian Springfield 2017 - Duration: 26:43.
Welcome to 1000PS TV, to the comparison Harley Davidson Road King 2017
against Indian Springfield 2017.
I really look forward to this because despite me loving a fast ride
I'm totally into these choppers, into cruising. And both bikes are actually
the stuff of my dreams, exactly what I want.
Still, there was a winner and there are some big differences.
It's like if somebody never heard Heavy Metal, he'd say it's all the same.
It's the same with choppers, somebody who never road one will say it's all the same.
But no, there are big differences.
And well, in the end there is a winner.
What's very important on cruisers, is the engine.
All of these engines have a huge displacement.
Of course they have low power, because as we know, power is torque times speed.
And because they don't rev high - I guess 6000 rpm, that's about the limit -
they don't have astonishing horse power. I guess it's about 90 hp on both.
Nevertheless there's a significant difference in torque.
On the Indian we have 135 Nm at 2100 rpm, that's massive!
And the Road King
with the new Milwaukee 8 engine
delivers 150 Nm at, I think, 3250 rpm.
The astonishing thing, which really surprised me, is -
let's talk about the Harley engine. It's, like mentioned, the Milwaukee 8 with 107 cubic inch,
which are 1745 cc.
And it has - this completely new from Harley - a 4-valve head.
These big tourers never had a 4-valve head. Just now, I think because EURO 4,
they switched to it. And they did a sensational job.
I'm deeply impressed, staggering how well it works.
And what surprised me: I thought the max torque comes a little later, at 3200 rpm,
not from the start. But it pushes out of low speed - insane!
While easily cruising it even made me think "Holy shit! There is some big torque-wave coming!", almost
overwhelming me.
But you'll get used to it quite fast and you really love the punch.
What else can we say of the engine?
As said, 1745 cc serial - 107 ci, 4-valve cylinder head
and, what's also new, the head is being - at least the outlet valves are being oil cooled.
What I didn't notice, although I usually do, was the fact the back
cylinder creates tremendous heat.
Today it's relatively cool so I didn't notice.
However if they did this with the oilcooled valves than it's great.
Because in summer it always was - I like to ride in shorts btw -
you ride and radiates so much heat you'd have to speed up.
So much for the engine. In my opinion the Milwaukee 8 is very well-made.
I have to doff my hat. It's great.
And lively, no doubt. He still rumbles and lives but has so much more
power than the 2016 version.
That's a dramatic difference and I love it!
It pushes heavily and also
does it from the bottom on.
If you twist the throttle you're really in for some power and this might make
you go wide in corners.
The suspension I'll mention later.
Now the Indian engine, the Thunderstroke 111.
To me
this has to be the neatest cruiser engine I know.
Just unbelievable how nice it looks. They did a tremendous job.
And since Indian -
the original Indians are 1 or 2 years older than HD. I think Indian
started 1901 and HD did 1903. Whereby Harley Davidson continued production till today
and Indian went bankrupt after WW2. They always sompeted with HD before
and it always was a big battle.
They broke speed records and always were in front in races, which of course is long gone.
And after the war they went broke, it was over after WW2.
In the 80s and 90s they tried to revive them,
however it was a flop.
This always bothered me because if you have a great name you need a great company
to built something sweet again.
Polaris now has done it.
They developed, I don't know,
the Thunderstroke 111 engine 5 or 6 years ago and -
Right, that was what i wanted to say -
took a good look at the classic models.
They saw they the distinct characteristics of the engines and made the
new ones just alike.
Now this has 1811 cc,
2 valves per head. not 4 like the Milwaukee 8.
A classic 2-valve
with a monstrous displacement
and 135 Nm. In America it has 160 Nm.
The european 135 Nm are a little hurtful I think. But the major market is America so they...
I'm sure the dealer could up you to 160 Nm by clipping the airbox and updating the software.
And since this is my endurance tester I will go for that.
However, it's not just great optically but as a cruiser engine as well.
Absolutely great!
Yet, it doesn't have the low speed punch of the Milwaukee 8.
What a great engine they built!
- but it has a very linear output over the entire rev range and is great
to use. And while cruising - I hardly ride these bikes very fast.
If I... how do you say? If I feel my oats!
Well, if I loose it I'll have to rip it shortly.
But normally I take a seat on something like this to completely relax and enjoy.
No stressing at all.
And with the linear output of the Thunderstroke 111 it's easier to do.
What's also important on a cruiser is the suspension.
But it's often disregarded because one might think it's all just cruising.
That's wrong however. Since you also ride - at least I am -
with passenger or on rough roads, because it doesn matter, there isn't much leaning anyways.
Then it certainly is important to have a capable suspension and spring range.
This was lacking on Harleys of the past.
Especially in the back it had very low spring range.
Indian did a tremendous job there.
A premium suspension right from the start.
In front there is 46mm cartridge fork
and in the back an air pressurised, adjustable monoshock.
This creates fantastic comfort while still being resilient.
You don't have to fear braking to late in corners and dropping the bike.
It stays stable.
The Harley suspension is way better than 2016.
They also have a cartridge fork,
with even 49mm stanchion tubes.
And in the back it has oil dashpots, 2 shock absorbers.
I personally think the spring range still isn't topnotch.
Generally it's tuned quite firmly.
Strangely this complements the 2017 Road King, as you can really ride it fast.
Regarding comfort the Indian wins it, but when it gets sporty
it was staggering how transparent it was because with most of these bikes
you don't have much feel for the front tyre.
But the Road King actually
delivers really well when you ride faster.
The Indian is a bit more diffuse. However, since I only cruise on such a thing
the suspension is - I'd probably chose this one as well, funnily enough.
Now, the brakes. It's always said Harley don't brake.
But the Road King with it's new brakes...
Unbelievable! Killer braking.
Due to the fork you can really bite the front wheel
and you basically are in a sporty league.
The brakes of the Indian are very good, well made for a chopper.
But this one is sharper. Has more bite.
I wouldn't have believed it either. But it is.
And, well - how shall I put it? - the better the brakes the more I like it.
Brakes are definately the Road Kings score. Though this one isn't bad either, it's great.
NOW!
The crazy thing.
The Road King already is a humdinger, a huge block.
But the Indian is bigger.
The Indian has a bigger wheelbase, 1701 mm opposed to 1645mm, I think.
It's not much, but still it's more "mass".
The weight is similar. Here we have 300...
Both are about 380 kg, I don't know exactly, maybe one 379
and the other 388 kg, but whatever.
Both are heavy pieces.
But you only feel it when maneuvering, not much while riding.
But there is a big disparity and you distinctly notice it in the ride.
The Indian Springfield has a quite steep steering angle of 25 degrees
and additionaly a 16 inch front wheel plus 133mm castor.
The Road King's fork isn't too flat either, but it has a 26 degree angle, 1° more,
a 17 inch wheel and 170mm castor.
You clearly feel this when steering.
The Indian Springfield
I have never ridden a chopper that steers so easily.
It's completely neutral,
more or less like mind controlled. You usually get this only on supersports.
It enters corners so easily, you only need 2 fingers
and the thought: "Now I enter the corner"
and the Indian Springfield enters.
The Road King fights a bit. You need a little pressure.
If you directly switch it feels almost unwieldy. But after a few
miles it's gone and you're fine.
If you pay attention you'll notice in slow corners it needs a bit
counter pressure or the cornering isn't neutral, it starts pulling towards the corner.
So you need to counterpress a bit, but you get use to it.
I also think that getting wide - on the Road King it happen 2 or 3 times
that I thought "Oops, if I continue this line, I'll get very wide!"
And becoming wide is a no-go. You can't ride into the oncoming traffic.
I managed by closing the throttle
then the radius becomes narrower.
I believe this happens first because it's not "mind-controlled" like this one is.
And second because of the engine having more punch.
It just pushes you. With a little twist of throttle you'll get a torque wave.
And this makes the bike go wide.
This means you need to work. Not on that bike however.
You sit on it dreamy and relaxed and it just rides how it shoud ride.
Without much effort needed.
Apropos cornering.
Of course there are always not-so-smart folks wo say:
"Come on, you can't corner a chopper!"...
Oh my!
Could be a face planter ahead.
Shit!
Apropos cornering. There are some ignorant people who say:
"Come on, you can't ride that, everything is dragging so quickly!"
Of course there are choppers who start dragging very quickly.
But the Road King, it always was a representative of these
heavy "iron chunks" as you might also call them, which indeed
have a respectable clearance.
Well, of course 32 degrees aren't the world. No doubt.
But
you have to strive to let it drag. "The Kukinger" did it once.
But when I ride normally I have got a comfortable lean angle ratio.
For most riders this is enough.
Most riders don't lean much further than 32°. It's good.
The Indian is also good, it has 31° lean angle clearance. I never dragged it.
I ride it very smooth, with much joy.
And don't have to think, like on the Fatboy -
on the Fatboy you have to tilt it upright a bit because it really drags fast.
But this one will never drag because it's absolutely species-appropriate.
Perfect!
Now we're talking a very important topic, the looks.
I think the optics on a cruiser are even more important than the technology.
Because it must really appeal to me, it has to touch my heart!
I've got to be able to sit in my garden and think: "Wow, it's so beautiful!"
Well,
the fact is Harley has always obliged me insanely.
And still does, I love it!
But the Indian
is on par with Harley.
In the book of optics it's just an insanely pretty bike. Unbelievable!
The engine,
I think it's the prettiest that exists, except for sportbike engines.
But they have different criteria.
It's insane, the cylinder heads! Than the rods!
And there the Indian logos! I have always been an Amerindian freak,
in the western movies I always voted for them.
This just makes me...
really happy when I look at it.
I love the Indian logo.
The oldschool fender is great. The front mask is amazing, sweeping..
And the saddle itself is an artwork.
A real leather saddle
which is finely shaped. Also is very comfortable
and just looks superb.
The suitcases also. They are plastic though, but the rest is metal.
And there, let me show you,
is the only unworthy plastic part, this here.
This sadly is such a plastic application.
Everything else you see, f.E. these chrome-plated fittings which are nice,
is metal.
And
they really did a great job.
They didn't miss out on anything, they knew their competition -
namely Harley Davidson - and knew they can't show weakness.
And they succeeded.
You get the chrome-plated fittings at Harley as well, but I believe
only on the CVU models, the "Screaming Eagle" range.
And those are much more expensive.
While we're at it
let us talk prices.
The Indian is more expensive than the Road King.
I'll have to check my notes quickly.
Because I can - I don't need to buy, just ride them thankfully.
The Indians costs 31495 € in Austria, in Germany 26995, because they
are bonkers with their taxes here.
It's insane, they collect 4500 € on taxes here!
Compared to Germany. A tremendous insolence I have to say!
And 29600 CHF. That's the Indian.
And now the cheaper bike, which is crazy.
But then again, you don't get chrome-plated fittings.
And what else?
There isn't much else.
I can't see much what might be better there than here.
Except the cables maybe.
Fact is, if you take a look,
the electronic cable are inside the handlebar, sweet.
And in comparison it almost looks cheap on the Harley.
The cables are everywhere here, and there - well, that's how it is.
I personally don't understand how on such an expensive bike
you can mount such cable joints, which seem to be open even.
I'm a russian tinkerer myself.
I'm crazy when I craft. But I would cover this up.
Sadly on the Indian I found this as well.
Where was it? Right there in the front, look!
That is something... I would... I don't understand that.
Now the Harley price tag.
The Road King in dual tone lacqer, like this one, costs 29700 in Austria.
In Germany, insane, 25065 €. That's 4700 cheaper! Insolence!
And in Switzerland it costs 25900 CHF.
Now
the price difference is about the same in all countries.
Still, it's significant, 1500-2000€, that's not few.
Especially since - the Indian has a strong name, but the Harley world is
legendary. The dealers are like temples.
Insofar it's a bold statement from Indian.
However I believe this is smart. They think: "We build a great bike
why should we offer it below value? Just because we don't have such a large buyer's base?"
Now the assessment.
The evaluation is purely subjective of course. I can only state what I myself -
I don't have to buy it, I get them provided.
If you'd tell me, I can ride to the Neusiedler lake this afternoon.
What would I take?
Funnily enough it definately is
the Indian Springfield.
Because it just incredibly pleases me.
I love it that it's something new.
An addition to the cruiser market.
The riding position is comfy. I'm a big fan of the cornering.
Motorcycles that seem to ride by themselves are my favourites. Always great.
Yet I have to add I would love it to ride the Road King as well.
The decision is clear yet close.
No matter which bike I would own, I'd be immensely proud and have huge joy.
But if I could chose I'd say my heart beats for the Springfield.
That's how it is!
I have a short addendum!
This time we have windhields mounted on both bikes.
Normally I took them off,
but it was relatively cold in spring.
So I really enjoyed it because it takes cold away quite well.
It is however - I usually only ride with windshields when I'm ripping it.
And you can't really rip them.
Although, I think
both are licensed with 180 kph, or 175 kph.
However I don't want to achieve it on these bikes, I don't think that's pleasant.
Also it's not species-appropriate and I don't do it.
I never ride such bikes that fast, maybe 120, 130 or briefly 140 kph.
It's no fun. But back to the windshield.
I always thought -
in the past I had a one on a Road King and I rode down to Mugello.
And I thought this is strange, you get so much turbulences.
Still do on both windshields.
But then I noticed, this was made for the US market and they don't ride
faster than 110 kph. Up to that the windshield
has very few turbulences, offers real protection and seats
you very relaxed.
Otherwise you also could ride 110 kph without windshield.
Now I kept it on because - how shall I put it? It's a bit warmer.
Or it's not as cold.
Many thanks for listening!
I hope the review was insightful.
I for sure had much joy riding both. And I hope the Road King isn't
mad at me for slightly preferring the Indian Springfield.
-------------------------------------------
ADVANCED CIVILIZATION MAY HAVE LIVED IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM BEFORE US, SCIENTIST SAYS - Duration: 4:52.
ADVANCED
CIVILIZATION MAY HAVE LIVED IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM BEFORE US, SCIENTIST SAYS
BY DANIEL LANG
You probably aren�t familiar with the name Jason T. Wright, but you�re probably familiar
with his work.
He�s the Penn State astronomer who put out the theory that there may be an alien megastructure
being built around a star that is 1,500 light years away.
That strange star must have given him a few ideas, because Wright has just published a
paper that suggests there could have been an advanced civilization in our solar system
before humans emerged.
He believes that �A prior indigenous technological species might have arisen on ancient Earth
or another body, such as a pre-greenhouse Venus or a wet Mars.� However, the real
crux of his paper is not just if there was an advanced race here before humans emerged,
but how we would go about finding evidence of this hypothetical species.
That�s because in all likelihood, any trace of an advanced civilization from millions,
or even billions of years ago, would be long gone.
If there were a civilization on Venus; a planet that used to be far more habitable than it
is now, a resurfacing event that occurred between 300-500 million years ago would have
utterly destroyed all evidence of that civilization.
On Earth, the gradual shift of our planet�s tectonic plates would have also destroyed
any evidence.
So where would we find any of what Wright calls �technosignatures� from millions
of years ago?
He argues that there may be some underground structures in certain locations that would
be protected from periodic asteroid strikes.
�Remaining indigenous technosignatures might be expected to be extremely old, limiting
the places they might still be found to beneath the surfaces of Mars and the moon, or in the
outer solar system.�
He added that �Such structures would be expected to fall into disrepair, especially
if its creators are absent,� but their technological nature would still be recognizable.
He also believes that we should be looking into the asteroid belt, where we might find
space probes, mining facilities, or even ancient settlements.
Though most scientists probably don�t think that an advanced species existed in this solar
system before we emerged here, Wright makes a pretty good case for looking in our own
backyard.
After all, if one advanced species evolved here, then it�s much more likely that other
advanced species lived here
in
the past.
-------------------------------------------
Agua com peixes vermelhos - Duration: 0:06.
For more infomation >> Agua com peixes vermelhos - Duration: 0:06. -------------------------------------------
라이즈 오브 더 툼레이더 #END(리부트된 라라가 다시 돌아왔다!)[Rise Of The Tomb Raider][도살장] - Duration: 29:19.
For more infomation >> 라이즈 오브 더 툼레이더 #END(리부트된 라라가 다시 돌아왔다!)[Rise Of The Tomb Raider][도살장] - Duration: 29:19. -------------------------------------------
3 men arrested in brutal murder of Guthrie man make first court appearance - Duration: 1:29.
JONATHAN: THOSE TWO MEN DID NOT
SAY MUCH DURING THEIR
ARRAIGNMENT THIS AFTERNOON.
BUT THEY ARE ARGUING NEW
INFORMATION THIS CASE IN
THESE NEWLY RELEASED COURT
DOCUMENTS.
ACCUSE MURDERERS DERRICK SMITH
AND REGGIE SMITH IN COURT VIA
VIDEOCONFERENCE IN LOGAN COUNTY.
DURING THEIR SEPARATE, SHORT
ARRAIGNMENTS, THE COURT READ
THEIR STATEMENTS AND SAID THEIR
BONDS WERE DENIED.
THE COUSINS ARE CHARGED WIT
SHOOTING JOSEPH ANGELO 36 TIMES
ON A PORCH IN GUTHRIE.
IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE FOR
SOMEONE TO WANT TO SHOOT
SOMEBODY 36 TIMES.
JONATHAN: JUST A COUPLE HOURS
BEFORE THE MURDER, A WOMAN HAD
TAKEN THREE PEOPLE TO ROB REGGIE
SMITH OF MARIJUANA.
A WITNESS WITH SMITH AFTER THE
ROBBERY SAID SMITH WAS ANGRY
ABOUT IT.
AND HE LEFT TO "GO FIND T
GANGBANGERS."
THE WITNESS IDENTIFIED DERRICK
AS ONE OF THE MEN THAT LEFT WITH
REGGIE.
WHEN ASKED IF HE TOOK CARE OF
IT, REGGIE REPLIED "YES, DO NOT
WORRY ABOUT IT."
AS MENTIONED AT THE TOP, A THIRD
SUSPECT HAS NOW BEEN ARRESTED.
FREDERIC VEASL JUNIOR TURNED
-------------------------------------------
Video: Why Do You Support President Donald Trump? - Duration: 2:33.
Hi my name is Catherine Perry I'm from
Jim Thorpe in Pennsylvania and I'm here
to support president jump on 100 day
mark today just so proud of what he's
doing and hoping that he can go forward
and keep the rhythm I supported them
from the beginning just because he is
not part of the establishment that is a
guy who's trying to do something better
for America I support president Trump
because he's putting America first
because I support America and I support
our Constitution and he's a breath of
fresh air in this day in time after
eight years of Obama and just the way
this country has gone for decades now I
love the message of making America first
closing up our borders bringing jobs
back to this country instead of shipping
them overseas and supporting our country
and our economy and that's just to begin
with that I could go on and on and on
and I support president stomp because I
think it's time we take our country back
it's time we start protecting our
borders it's time that we take our
economy back but more spending power and
and to the people instead of sending it
to Washington
I'm Gavin and I support Donald Trump
because he takes military action he
knows when to take action he he doesn't
do it anything himself he has he knows
of a knows a bunch of people that have
that know how to do things and he
doesn't really rely on himself he's
willing to cooperate with other people
and he doesn't go into a fight alone
without knowing that he's got backup and
the big thing for the hundred day for me
is that we've elected a man who's
finally going to stand up against the
leftist liberals the right leaning sick
of fans that don't want anything to do
with his agenda they need to get in line
they need to do what he needs done what
the American people need done we need to
make sure that this president is
supported that's why I'm here today
and I support him because he is all the
same values I do and I hope he gets him
done so basically that's it yeah and I
definitely
as far as his hundred day mark I feel
just done a lot I feel that we need to
give him more time
and above all more appreciation
-------------------------------------------
Superhero Hulk Superman Batman with mms icecream surprise toys Nursery Rhymes for Kids Children - Duration: 13:37.
For more infomation >> Superhero Hulk Superman Batman with mms icecream surprise toys Nursery Rhymes for Kids Children - Duration: 13:37. -------------------------------------------
Jugando Shadown Figth 2¡¡ - Duration: 4:11.
For more infomation >> Jugando Shadown Figth 2¡¡ - Duration: 4:11. -------------------------------------------
Jay Manuel Beauty Brush Set w/Makeup Artist Roll Case - Duration: 3:36.
For more infomation >> Jay Manuel Beauty Brush Set w/Makeup Artist Roll Case - Duration: 3:36. -------------------------------------------
Jay Manuel Beauty The Ultimate Lip Gloss Guilt - Duration: 5:27.
For more infomation >> Jay Manuel Beauty The Ultimate Lip Gloss Guilt - Duration: 5:27. -------------------------------------------
Dibujos Animados para Niños - Tanques divertido Videos infantiles -1 horas Vehículos para Niños - Duration: 57:20.
For more infomation >> Dibujos Animados para Niños - Tanques divertido Videos infantiles -1 horas Vehículos para Niños - Duration: 57:20. -------------------------------------------
NEW Young Thug x Travis Scott Type Beat 2017 "C.L.D.A." | Rap instrumental | Prod. By DigitalBeatz - Duration: 3:49.
New Young Thug
Travis Scott Type Beat
2017 Rap Instrumental
C.L.D.A.
Produced By DigitalBeatz.net
thanks for viewing, please subscribe!
-------------------------------------------
Tanks - Cars FULL EPISODE ᴴᴰ About 1 hour ★★★ Best Funny Cartoon for kid ► SPECIAL COLLECTION 2017 - Duration: 59:16.
Tanks - Cars FULL EPISODE ᴴᴰ About 1 hour ★★★ Best Funny Cartoon for kid ► SPECIAL COLLECTION 2017
-------------------------------------------
Funny Tanks - Cars Cool Episode - Tom and Tanks & Babies Show | Funny Cartoons For Kids - Duration: 39:59.
Funny Tanks - Cars Cool Episode - Tom and Tanks & Babies Show | Funny Cartoons For Kids
-------------------------------------------
O crima extrem de înceată cu o armă extrem de ineficientă (comedie) - Duration: 10:17.
For more infomation >> O crima extrem de înceată cu o armă extrem de ineficientă (comedie) - Duration: 10:17. -------------------------------------------
Responding to Jesse Wellens: What Actually Makes YouTube Great - Duration: 7:58.
Hello YouTube. It's Chase here
Today I wanted to do a video response to Jesse's newest video on PrankvsPrank.
Hi guys.
Sitting here in my car, in a parking lot over at Menchie's, the frozen yogurt chain, here in town.
Going there with some of my friends
They followed me here, but they're dropping someone off at their house who lives really close by.
So, they're going to be back here in a few minutes. But, I'm here just waiting for them. Chilling in my car.
I had planned to film parts of today's video at the college. I was going to have some people help me
But, I'm just going to be doing it on my own this weekend. I'll probably have to have some of them help me with future videos
But for this video, just gonna be a one man team again. So
Just waitin for my friends and then we'll get frozen yogurt.
Hello YouTube. It's Chase here. Today I wanted to do a video response to Jesse's newest video on PrankvsPrank.
I was one of the first people to watch his new video on YouTube as soon as it was uploaded.
I got the notification on my desktop and I immediately clicked on it.
And of course, he used a clickbait title called "Quitting YouTube."
Now, even before I clicked on the video, I knew that he probably wouldn't actually quit YouTube and there'd be some reason he uploaded this video.
So, I clicked on it. And, of course, after a few minutes of watching, he is pretty serious about wanting to quit YouTube
if his views on his channel don't improve.
So, I mean, you can go watch his video if you haven't watched it already.
But basically, he says that like the views on his channel are down, you know, and why spend so much time
making these great videos? He's such a talented creator. Why make these huge videos on YouTube when people who used to watch his videos aren't watching them?
because it's not being pushed out to people through YouTube.
That's what many large YouTubers have been saying lately. Is that, their videos are not getting viewed by their existing audience.
because of the changes in the YouTube algorithm.
I also feel like it's possible that these big YouTubers have lost touch with their fans. They've lost touch with how they actually became popular.
and, they need to, kind of, remember why they became famous on YouTube. Why people started watching them.
After two years of wanting to make videos on YouTube, I decided to invest in my passion for creating.
I've come to realize and understand that it doesn't matter how many people are watching my videos.
What matters is that I'm experiencing, I'm learning, and I'm always creating,
isn't that what YouTube's really about? Creating content that you're proud of in that very moment?
I've really come to love and appreciate Jesse's videos. I've been watching his channel for a long time.
I've been watching his channel longer than I've been watching any other channel on YouTube.
I wouldn't say that he inspired me through BFvsGF and PrankvsPrank, when those two channels were very popular.
I'm not saying that he inspired me to do YouTube, but he definitely gave me that final nudge
during the year that I started uploading videos
His editing style, his filmmaking style is so unique. It's so different. it's such a breath of fresh air.
If you watched like his Burning Man video, there's something so unique and so cool about them, especially now that he's kind of been losing
that Casey Neistat influence now that he stopped vlogging. He's been making these big production things in his goal to become a filmmaker.
And it's really great stuff. However, Jesse's complaining in his newest video about not getting very many views and potentially leaving YouTube shows that
he has forgotten the essence of what actually made YouTube great. It's about the product, not the views. There's so many videos that
we would call "trash content" get millions of views. And, I'm guilty of watching them. I love watching videos like that.
However, there's so many of them out there and quality videos are no longer being made. The essence of YouTube is making videos that you're proud of
Views shouldn't affect that. I'm not slamming Jesse. I still look up to him as a creator. I still think he's one of the greatest YouTubers.
I will follow him whether he stays on YouTube or not. I will always follow whatever he makes.
And I'm not saying that I have all of the answers. I'm not saying that I'm great at making YouTube videos. However, I'm driven to make better content.
Every time I make a video, I try to make it the best that I can in that particular moment.
Yeah, you'll hear me admit that it wasn't that good or I might've done this differently or that differently, but in the end
I made the best video that I could in that moment in time when I hit the upload button.
Trying to always make my best video yet is what keeps me going on YouTube. Not the views. Not the subscribers. And not the money.
I've spent more money on camera equipment for this channel than I'll ever get back from it.
And that's because I love what I do
I'm doing this because I want to be a good filmmaker. I want to make the best content that I can
So the number of views, the number of subscribers is great. I celebrate that when I reach these milestones.
it really makes my work feel recognized and appreciated and it does give me a boost to keep going
However, the main reason that I upload videos is to always make better content. I am continuously trying to improve the videos that I make
and I will not stop making videos until I am satisfied with where I'm at. I know where I want to be, but I don't know how to get there.
and the only way I can think of getting there is to continue making videos and continue practicing what I'm doing.
So, putting your YouTube career in the balance because you're not getting enough views and claiming that you want YouTube to be great again
it just doesn't add up. Views is not what made YouTube great.
It's the creators who put their soul into their work and don't expect anything in return.
Thanks for watching. I hope you all have a fantastic day or night, whenever you are watching this
As always, continue to follow your dreams and don't let anyone stop you
As always, I'm Chase Charaba and I'm exploring life through moving pictures.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét