DURING THE CAMPAIGN A NONPROFIT THAT WAS FEATURED
RATHER PROMINENTLY DURING DONALD TRUMP'S RALLIES AND
ESPECIALLY DURING THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION WAS A
HOUSTON-BASED NONPROFIT KNOWN AS THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT.
THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT ESSENTIALLY WANTED TO DO SOME
WORK RAISING AWARENESS OF FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE VICTIMIZED
AS A RESULT OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS IN THE COUNTRY.
FAMILIES WHO LOST A CHILD AS A RESULT OF AN UNDOCUMENTED
IMMIGRANTS, DRINKING AND DRIVING, STUFF LIKE THAT.
AND SO INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, THE FAMILIES THAT WERE
PROMINENTLY FEATURED DURING CHARLES CAMPAIGN ARE NOW
PUSHING BACK AGAINST THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT
CLAIMING THAT THEY WERE QUOTES USED, ABUSED, AND EXPLOITED
BY THE NONPROFIT AND TO A LESSER EXTENT, DONALD TRUMP.
MORE THAN A DOZEN FAMILIES INVOLVED IN THE
HOUSTON-BASED REMEMBRANCE PROJECT INCLUDING TWO WHO
SPOKE AT THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION AND SEVERAL MORE
SPOKE AT TRUMP'S RALLIES WERE FEATURED IN HIS CAMPAIGN
ADS HAVE PARTED WAYS WITH THE ORGANIZATION.
THE CHARITY HAS DONE NOTHING TO HELP THEM FINANCIALLY,
DESPITE SUGGESTING THAT THE MONEY IT RAISED, INCLUDING
$52,000 OR MORE RACE WHICH RUNS HELP WOULD BE USED TO
ASSIST FAMILY MEMBERS.
THEY HAVE RAISED WAY MORE THAN $52,000.
THERE WAS ONE EVENT WHERE THEY HAD DONALD TRUMP SPEAK AND
PEOPLE SPENT A LOT OF MONEY PER PLATE JUST TO ATTEND THAT AND
THAT WAS WHERE THEY RAISED $52,000 AND THEN THERE WERE
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS THAT DONATED MONEY TO THEM, INCLUDING US INC.
THEY VOTED DONATED $57,500.
ANYWAY, THERE RAISING OWES MONEY.
THEY ARE NONPROFIT THAT IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE INVOLVED IN
POLITICS BUT THEY WERE VERY MUCH INVOLVED IN POLITICS.
THESE FAMILIES WHO WERE PARADED AROUND DURING THE RALLIES
AND DURING THE CAMPAIGN RECEIVED ACTUAL ABSOLUTE NO HELP SO
NOW THEY ARE UPSET.
ONE PERSON SAYS, RESPECT, WE WERE USED, ABUSED AND
EXPLOITED AND WHAT'S WORSE IS THAT MY SON WAS USED, ABUSED
AND EXPLOITED AND IS STILL BEING USED, ABUSED AND EXPLOITED.
HER SON STORY IS STILL BEING UTILIZED BY THIS NONPROFIT
AND SHE AND OTHER FAMILIES ARE THINKING ABOUT SUING JUST
TO GET IT TO STOP.
ALSO, THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT PRESIDENT SAYS, NO, THIS IS
NOT THE PRESIDENT.
THIS IS THE WRONG CITATION BUT ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL SAYS I
SORT OF FELT LIKE WE WERE JUST A DOG AND PONY SHOW ON STAGE
FOR ALL OF THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE DONORS AND WHO WEREN'T VICTIMS.
SO ANGIE MARVIN VARGAS, SHE IS THE PARTICIPANTS AND SO SHE
WAS UPSET WITH THE WAY THAT SHE AND HER FAMILY WERE TREATED
AS A RESULT OF ALL THIS.
THIS STORY IS LITTLE NUANCED.
I THINK DONALD TRUMP USED ALL OF THESE GROUPS, OF COURSE,
FOR POLITICAL REASONS, BUT TO BE FAIR, POLITICIANS, THAT IS
WHAT THEY DO.
THEY USE GIRLS ARE POLITICAL REASONS THAT THEY AGREE WITH SO
THEY WANTED TO SHOWCASE PEOPLE WHO HAD BEEN HURT BY
UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS SO THAT THEY COULD USE THAT AS A WAY TO
STOP IMMIGRATION AND TARGET UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS BUT TO
BE FAIR, DONALD TRUMP CAN'T CONTROL WHAT THE ORGANIZERS OF
THIS GROUP, SO HE COULD MAYBE HOLD THEM MORE ACCOUNTABLE.
OR KNOW TO WHAT DEGREE HE KNOWS ABOUT THE LATEST HE TELLS
IN THIS CASE AND BEFORE YOU GET TO WE BE I FOR BRENDA SPARKS AND
THE OTHERS WHO ARE SAYING THEY WERE EXPLOITED, FIRST OF ALL,
LET'S BE CLEAR, THEIR SON DIED SO ON THAT, OF COURSE WE SUPPORT
THEM EMOTIONALLY AND WE FELT TERRIBLE FOR THEIR LOSS BUT
IN TERMS OF POLICY, THEY ARE ACTUALLY PASTE AT TRUMP FOR
NOT BEING DRACONIAN ENOUGH.
THEY WANT DONALD TRUMP TO GO AFTER PEOPLE WHO ARE
LABELED AS DREAMERS IN THE COUNTRY.
PEOPLE WHO ARE BROUGHT INTO THE UNITED STATES AS CHILDREN
AND STILL HAVE UNDOCUMENTED STATUS.
THEY WANT DONALD TRUMP TO DEPORT THOSE PEOPLE AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE AND THEY ARE UPSET THAT HE SEEMS TO HAVE RESERVED
HIS POSITION ON THAT SITUATION.
THE INTERESTING PART OF THE STORY IS TWOFOLD.
ONE IS THAT ONE OF THESE RIGHT-WING GROUPS POP UP,
THE WOMAN WHO RUNS THIS IS MARIA ESPINOZA AND SHE RAN ANOTHER
GROUP ABOUT SOME HEALTHCARE ISSUE, SPYING UP IF IT A.
BUTTON WORKS THERE LIKE LET'S LEAVE THAT ASIDE SO THEY GO
TO THIS DAUGHTER KNOW WHY THEY CARED ABOUT THESE TWO ISSUES.
THEY COULD THOUGH.
PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT ISSUES.
ALL OF A SUDDEN SHE STARTED GETTING PAID BY A LOT OF
THE RIGHT WING GROUPS BECAUSE SHE IS LIKE THIS IS USEFUL.
THE SPINA BIFIDA THING WE DON'T CARE ABOUT, BUT THIS IS USEFUL.
SISTER GIVING THEM CHECKS AND THERE LIKE GOOD.
SHE STARTS A LITTLE MORE FAMOUS AND THEN SHE DECIDE SHE IS GOING
TO RUN FOR CONGRESS IN 2018 AND I DON'T KNOW, AND IT MAY BE
TO BE SORTED OUT IN QUARTER SOMETHING DID SHE REALLY
PROMISED TO GIVE THESE FAMILIES MONEY AND STIFF THEM?
IF SHE DID, SHE WOULD BE THE 100TH RIGHT-WING GROUP IN A
ROW TO DO THAT.NET EVERY WHITE RIGHT-WING GROUPS DOES THAT
BUT A LOT OF THEM TO DOUBT THE SARAH PALIN TRICK.
TO GIVE ME MONEY AND I WILL GIVE IT TO REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES I
THINK SHE GIVES AROUND 3% OF ITS REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES AND SPENDS
A LOT MORE MONEY BUYING HER OWN BOOKS WITH THE MONEY YOU
VOTE DONATED TO HER POLITICAL CAUSE.
IT SEEMS LIKE A FUN REPUBLICAN HOBBY WHERE YOU
RUN A SO-CALLED CHARITY A FUNDRAISER AND CLAIM YOU
ARE GOING TO GIVE MONEY TO CERTAIN GROUPS OF PEOPLE AND
THEN YOU END UP NOT GIVING THAT MONEY CERTAIN GROUPS OF PEOPLEÖ
TRUMPETED THAT WITH CLAIMING HE WAS THE CLAIMING MONEY FOR
MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY NEEDED THE EXACT OPPOSITE.
I STILL DON'T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT HE GAVE ANY OF THAT
MONEY TO MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY BUT IN THIS CASE, WITH THE
COFOUNDER OF THE REMEMBRANCE PROJECT SHE CLAIMS I NEVER
PROMISED ANYONE MONEY.
WE JUST WANTED TO BE THERE FOR EMOTIONAL SUPPORT.
OKAY, WHY ARE YOU HAVING THESE DRAGON IT FUNDRAISERS THEN?
WHAT ARE THEY FOR?
EVER PRETTY GOOD IDEA.
ALSO, YOU ARE A NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION THAT IS
SUPPOSED TO ABIDE BY CERTAIN LAWS.
YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE IN TROUBLE WITH THE IRS IF YOU
ARE A NONPROFIT AND INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL WORLD.
SHE IS VERY MUCH INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL WORLD.
THEY WENT TO CAMPAIGN RALLIES WITH TRUMP.
THEY HAD MEMBERS OF THEIR ORGANIZATION SPEAK AT THESE
RALLIES.
THEY HAD FAMILY MEMBERS BEGET THESE RALLIES.
THIS IS VERY MUCH A POLITICAL GROUP.
THERE'S NO QUESTION ABOUT IT SO WHY DO THEY HAVE A
NONPROFIT STATUS?
IT IS RIDICULOUS.
ARE CAMPAIGN LAWS ARE BASICALLY CONSIDERED A JOKE AT THIS POINT.
KARL ROVE USES THE SAME LAWS.
HE'S DOING SOMETHING NONPOLITICAL?
IS ALWAYS HAPPENING.
EVERYTHING HE DOES IS FOR THE POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS THAT HE
WORKS ON BUT HE WILL SET UP A 501(C) 4.
THAT'S FINE AND THEN OR C THREES.
THAT'S A LOT OF NUMBERS.
BULGES SALE, IT IS A CHARITY.
OUR CHARITY IS REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS.
NOBODY IS MINDING THAT.
THEY ARE IN PURPOSE WITH THE VOTE SO THERE IS NO ENFORCEMENT.
SPLIT BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS.
REPUBLICANS REFUSE TO EVER INVESTIGATE ABUSE OF OTHER
REPUBLICANS AND RIGHT-WINGERS IN THE ESTABLISHMENT DEMOCRATS
WON'T INVESTIGATE THE ESTABLISHMENT DEMOCRATIC
POLITICS POLITICIANS SO THEY GET AWAY WITH IT I'VE YOU ARE
REAL PROGRESSIVE THAT WHEN YOU PUT A, IN THE WRONG PLACE
IT WILL BOTH AGREE TO COME DOWN ON YOU LIKE A TON OF BRICKS.
UNDERSTAND WHO HAS TO ABIDE BY THE ONE WHO DOESN'T ARE
I WANT TO LEAVE THE STORY WITH A QUOTE FROM A TEXAS
REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST BECAUSE I THINK IT IS TELLING.
IN TERMS OF HOW THIS ORGANIZATION RAISES MONEY
AND HOW MISLEADING THEY SEEM TO BE.
TEXAS REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST KATHLEEN LIEBERMANN WHO
ATTENDED THE LUNCHEON WITH 10 ASSOCIATES WHO PAID $125
EACH FOR TICKETS THAT WE BELIEVED THAT THE MONEY
AFTER THE DINNER WAS GOING TO HELP THE FAMILIES, AND I
WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED TO FIND OUT THAT IT DIDN'T.
SO
ARE THE FAMILIES.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét